19.09.2015 Views

TABLE CONTENTS

How different or similar are nematode communities - International ...

How different or similar are nematode communities - International ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Effect of Biofumigation on Population Dynamics of Pratylenchus spp.<br />

Daub, M. (1), M. Schlathölter (2), W. Schütze (3), R. Grosch (4) & J. Hallmann (5)<br />

(1) Julius Kuehn-Institut (JKI), Institut for Plant Protection in Field Crops und Grassland, Dürener Straße 71, D-<br />

50189 Elsdorf; (2) P. H. Petersen Saatzucht Lundsgaard GmbH & Co. KG, Streichmühler Str. 8a, D-24977<br />

Grundhof; (3) JKI, Institute for Ecological Chemistry, Plant Analysis and Stored Products Protection, Erwin-<br />

Baur-Str. 27, D-06484 Quedlinburg; (4) Institiute of Vegetable and Ornamental Crops, Theodor Echtermeyer<br />

Weg 1, D-14979 Großbeeren; (5) JKI, Institute for Epidemiology and Pathogen Diagnostics, Toppheideweg 88,<br />

D-48161 Münster<br />

The lesion nematode (Pratylenchus spp.) is a major constraint to agricultural and horticultural<br />

crops, causing severe yield losses in conventional as well as organic farming systems. Due to<br />

the wide host range of Pratylenchus crop rotation for nematode control is difficult. A<br />

relatively new and promising control measure is biofumigation. The method makes use of<br />

crucifer species and varieties with high concentration of glucosinolates. The crop is mulched<br />

into the soil at flowering when glucosinolate concentration reaches its peak. Due to<br />

enzymatic hydrolysis of the glucosinolates nematicidal isothiocynates are released into the<br />

soil. The efficacy of biofumigation to control Pratylenchus spp. in temperate regions was<br />

tested in 2006 and 2007 at two field sites on a commercial farm in Northern Germany. The<br />

two field sites differed in Pratylenchus species compostion; field site A was primarily<br />

infested with P. crenatus, field site B with P. penetrans and P. neglectus. The biofumigation<br />

crops were planted after harvest of the previous crop in late July and incorporated mid<br />

September. On field site A the biofumigation treatment Terraprotect (Brassica juncea cv<br />

Energy x Raphanus sativus cv Defender) reduced P. crenatus population density by 50%,<br />

while R. sativus cv Defender caused 30% decrease. On field site B all 10 biofumiagtion<br />

treatments reduced the population density of Pratylenchus spp.: reproduction rates ranged<br />

between 0.2 (Raphanus sativus cv Colonel) and 0.85 (Brassica juncea cv Terrafit).<br />

Bionematicide Effects of Canola Extracts on Heterodera schachtii in vitro<br />

Fatemy, S.<br />

Nematology Department, Plant Protection Research Institute, P. O. Box 1454-19395, Tehran, Iran<br />

Tissues of several species of Brassica family produce compounds such as glucosinolates<br />

which have nematicidal effects. A study was carried out in vitro conditions to assess the<br />

potential of canola extracts on percentage hatch of eggs and mobility of juveniles of sugar<br />

beet cyst nematode. Two commercial Canola cultivars were grown until flowering onset, tops<br />

were cut, frizzed at −20 ○ C; leaves were chopped in a blender, passed through filter papers<br />

and 3 concentrations of stock, 50 and 10% were made. One ml of each concentration was<br />

placed in each well of tissue culture plates to which 50 cysts and/or J2 of Heterodera<br />

schachtii were added and treatments with 10 replicates were kept at 20 and 15 ○ C<br />

respectively. After 72 h, about 100, 80% and less than 1% of juveniles were immobile in<br />

concentrations of stock, 50 and 10% of both cultivars respectively; all juveniles in water<br />

control were alive by the end of the experiment. After 21 days, average 8% of eggs within<br />

cysts were hatched in stock solution of both cvs compared with 50% of those in water<br />

control.<br />

5 th International Congress of Nematology, 2008 278

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!