a-collection-of-research-articles-on-the-medical-potential-of-cow-urine

ISSN NO 2320-5407 International Journal <strong>of</strong> Advanced Research (2013), Volume 1, Issue 5, 71-78
TEC was 6.31±0.37 x 10 6 /cumm. The TEC decreased
to 7.32±0.58 x 10 6 /cumm at 180 day <strong>of</strong> experiment.
In group CUD+A the total erythrocyte count, at zero
day was 6.31±0.97 x 10 6 /cumm which was increased
to 8.90±0.47 x 10 6 /cumm at the end <strong>of</strong> experiment.
Group CUD+B had 6.37±0.53 x 10 6 /cumm TEC at
zero day and 8.59±0.62 x 10 6 /cumm at the end <strong>of</strong>
experiment, respectively. In CUD+G and CUD+H
groups the TEC at zero day were 6.42±0.59 x
10 6 /cumm and 6.35±0.61 x 10 6 /cumm, respectively
and were 8.51±0.42 x 10 6 /cumm and 8.48±0.43 x
10 6 /cumm at the end <strong>of</strong> the experiment. In group B, G
and H, the TEC at zero day was found 6.33±0.61 x
10 6 /cumm, 6.39±0.41 x 10 6 /cumm and 6.37±0.52 x
10 6 /cumm, respectively and at the end <strong>of</strong> experiment
increased to 7.29±0.57 x 10 6 /cumm, 7.20±0.37 x
10 6 /cumm and 7.18±0.41 x 10 6 /cumm.
Data <strong>of</strong> TLC is expressed in no. <strong>of</strong> cells x 10 3 /cumm
and is presented in Table-3.Initially the TLC count <strong>of</strong>
control group was 8.91±0.30 x 10 3 /cumm and after 6
month the TLC was 12.11±0.04 x 10 3 /cumm. In DEN
(negative control) group the initial TLC at zero day
<strong>of</strong> experiments was 9.12±3.20 x 10 3 /cumm which
was decreased to 3.02±1.45 x 10 3 /cumm. But in CUD
treated group, the TLC at zero day was 8.65±4.31 x
10 3 /cumm and 9.53±4.67 x 10 3 /cumm at the end <strong>of</strong>
experiment. In CUD treated group, the initial
TLC at zero day was 9.02±5.31 x 10 3 /cumm which
decreased to 7.81±3.11 x 10 3 /cumm. In test group
like A, the zero day TLC was 9.08±5.68 x 10 3 /cumm
which was decreased to 8.64±3.08 x
10 3 /cumm.CUD+A had the zero day mean TLC
count as 8.97±4.02 x 10 3 /cumm which was increased
to 12.61±2.17 x 10 3 /cumm, at the end <strong>of</strong> experiment.
Group CUD+B has 8.89±6.31 x 10 3 /cumm at zero
day and was 10.55±3.18 x 10 3 /cumm at the end <strong>of</strong>
experiment.In group B, G and H, the TLC at zero day
was observed as 9.01±6.81 x 10 3 /cumm, 9.10±6.07 x
10 3 /cumm and 9.07±7.03 x 10 3 /cumm, respectively
and at the end <strong>of</strong> experiment 8.59±3.19 x 10 3 /cumm,
8.33±3.61 x 10 3 /cumm and 8.30±4.1 x 10 3 /cumm
respectively. In groups CUD+G and CUD+H the
TLC at zero day was 9.11±5.98 x 10 3 /cumm,
9.03±6.19 x 10 3 /cumm and was 10.21±3.81 x
10 3 /cumm and 10.05±3.14 x 10 3 /cumm at the end <strong>of</strong>
the experiment, respectively.
Data <strong>of</strong> ALC is expressed in no. <strong>of</strong> cells x
10 3 /cumm and is presented in Table-4.Initially the
ALC count <strong>of</strong> control group was 4.30±0.69 x
10 3 /cumm and after 6 month the ALC was 5.92±0.98
x 10 3 /cumm. In DEN (negative control) group the
initial ALC at zero day <strong>of</strong> experiments was 4.41±0.81
x 10 3 /cumm which was decreased to 1.36±0.47 x
10 3 /cumm. But in CUD treated group, the ALC at
zero day was 4.13±0.70 x 10 3 /cumm and 4.63±0.43 x
10 3 /cumm at the end <strong>of</strong> experiment.In CUD treated
group, the initial ALC at zero day was 4.43±0.84 x
10 3 /cumm which decreased to 3.76±0.53 x
10 3 /cumm. In test group like A, the zero day ALC
was 4.42±0.91 x 10 3 /cumm which was decreased to
4.19±0.27 x 10 3 /cumm.CUD+A had the zero day
mean ALC count as 4.39±0.87 x 10 3 /cumm which
was increased to 6.16±0.42 x 10 3 /cumm, at the end <strong>of</strong>
experiment. Group CUD+B has 4.36±0.89 x
10 3 /cumm at zero day and was 5.16±0.80 x
10 3 /cumm at the end <strong>of</strong> experiment.In group B, G and
H, the ALC at zero day was observed as 4.40±0.94 x
10 3 /cumm, 4.48±0.73 x 10 3 /cumm and 4.44±0.84 x
10 3 /cumm, respectively and at the end <strong>of</strong> experiment
4.18±0.94 x 10 3 /cumm, 4.01±0.37 x 10 3 /cumm and
3.98±0.77 x 10 3 /cumm respectively. In groups
CUD+G and CUD+H the ALC at zero day was
4.41±0.80 x 10 3 /cumm, 4.42±0.79 x 10 3 /cumm and
was 4.90±0.28 x 10 3 /cumm and 4.89±0.11 x
10 3 /cumm at the end <strong>of</strong> the experiment, respectively.
Data <strong>of</strong> ANC is expressed in no. <strong>of</strong> cells x
10 3 /cumm and is presented in Table-5.Initially the
ANC count <strong>of</strong> control group was 4.57±0.72 x
10 3 /cumm and after 6 month the ANC was 6.00±0.99
x 10 3 /cumm. In DEN (negative control) group the
initial ANC at zero day <strong>of</strong> experiments was
4.69±0.83 x 10 3 /cumm which was decreased to
1.49±0.52 x 10 3 /cumm. But in CUD treated group,
the ANC at zero day was 4.38±0.78 x 10 3 /cumm and
4.71±0.47 x 10 3 /cumm at the end <strong>of</strong> experiment.
In CUD treated group, the initial ANC at
zero day was 4.51±0.97 x 10 3 /cumm which decreased
to 3.88±0.56 x 10 3 /cumm. In test group like A, the
zero day ANC was 4.60±0.97 x 10 3 /cumm which was
decreased to 4.30±0.31 x 10 3 /cumm.CUD+A had the
zero day mean ANC count as 4.46±0.89 x 10 3 /cumm
which was increased to 6.25±0.45 x 10 3 /cumm, at the
end <strong>of</strong> experiment. Group CUD+B has 4.41±0.92 x
10 3 /cumm at zero day and was 5.24±0.82 x
10 3 /cumm at the end <strong>of</strong> experiment.In group B, G and
H, the ANC at zero day was observed as 4.58±0.99 x
10 3 /cumm, 4.56±0.75 x 10 3 /cumm and 4.51±0.87 x
10 3 /cumm, respectively and at the end <strong>of</strong> experiment
4.26±0.96 x 10 3 /cumm, 4.11±0.38 x 10 3 /cumm and
4.09±0.79 x 10 3 /cumm respectively. In groups
CUD+G and CUD+H the ANC at zero day was
4.52±0.84 x 10 3 /cumm, 4.50±0.85 x 10 3 /cumm and
was 5.01±0.29 x 10 3 /cumm and 4.96±0.12 x
10 3 /cumm at the end <strong>of</strong> the experiment, respectively.
74