16.09.2015 Views

According

August 2009 - Advaita Ashrama

August 2009 - Advaita Ashrama

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PB August 2009<br />

Spiritual Substance and Perfection in Indian Thought 41<br />

Equally remarkable is the concept of liberation<br />

in Vedanta. In Vedanta, moksha is not a negative<br />

concept, but a positive state. It is true that liberation<br />

from samsara is the end of all earthly pain,<br />

but the end coincides with the emergence of unobstructed<br />

bliss. This bliss is different from earthly<br />

happiness. It is a transcendental bliss beyond all<br />

difference and duality. Worldly happiness is fraught<br />

with such dualities as pleasure and pain, but pure<br />

transcendental bliss is unalloyed.<br />

More important, this condition of bliss can be<br />

achieved by the aspirant here and now, while still<br />

living in this world. When the realization that this<br />

world is maya—and therefore mithyā, devoid of<br />

an ultimate meaning—and that Brahman alone<br />

is real is fully integrated with one’s practical conduct,<br />

then the person achieves liberation here and<br />

now. This is jīvanmukti, freedom while living. A<br />

jīvanmukta continues to live till the momentum of<br />

his past actions remains in operation, performing<br />

actions without any sense of obligation, dedicating<br />

one’s actions and their fruits either to God or to<br />

the welfare of society. Being selfless, the jīvanmukta<br />

has no desires to be fulfilled. The process of liberation<br />

culminates in the death of the body, and the<br />

liberated soul does not come back to this world in<br />

any bodily form, as the association of the self with<br />

the body and mind is permanently severed. This is<br />

videhamukti.<br />

This brief account underscores the importance<br />

accorded to the conception of spiritual substance<br />

and liberation in each of the orthodox Indian<br />

philosophical systems. Even though some of these<br />

systems may not have been able to elucidate a<br />

very satisfactory view of the self and its liberation,<br />

due to difficulties inherent in their basic tenets,<br />

they have nevertheless grappled hard with these<br />

formulations.<br />

Of the heterodox systems, it is perhaps the<br />

Charvakas—the school of materialists—alone,<br />

that neither accepts Vedic authority nor the reality<br />

of God, of the self as an entity separate from the<br />

body, or of liberation. It accords reality only to<br />

matter. Also, it believes that our present life is the<br />

only life we have. There is no hereafter, and death<br />

involves total annihilation of the human personality.<br />

The other heterodox schools—that of Jainism<br />

and Buddhism—also do not accept the concept of<br />

God or the authority of the Vedas. But they view<br />

the yogic path of spiritual discipline as one that<br />

leads to liberation.<br />

P<br />

(Continued from page 460)<br />

Again, it cannot be said that, inasmuch as it<br />

has parts, consciousness is a compound and must<br />

share the fate of all compound entities: destruction.<br />

That holds good in the case of material things only.<br />

It cannot be predicated of consciousness. Do we<br />

not see every moment of our lives that the many<br />

thoughts, feelings, and urges bobbing up and down<br />

in our mind are nothing but consciousness? But<br />

do any of them die, or get destroyed? They abide<br />

even when all discrete material things vanish into<br />

their source—the so-called ultimate homogeneous<br />

force or energy. We have used the word ‘part’ in<br />

the context of consciousness, but the connotation<br />

is not the same as in relation to a material thing.<br />

Matter can be cut or torn, not so consciousness.<br />

Leaving aside the basic consciousness, the active or<br />

willing-consciousness remains the same unruffled<br />

unmoving consciousness, in spite of its innumerable<br />

modes and manners; it neither increases nor<br />

decreases, and yet produces a bewildering multitude<br />

of ideas and emotions, all the while retaining<br />

its command over them—even as the earth remains<br />

but earth though the shapes and sizes of earthenware<br />

appear, change, and vanish.<br />

To kill or destroy requires two. Consciousness<br />

is singular, infinite in all respects, within and<br />

beyond time and space. Who can destroy it or<br />

make it change in a manner other than its own?<br />

Abiding peace is attained only when this thoroughly<br />

reasoned posture of the identity of ‘feelingconsciousness’<br />

and ‘willing-consciousness’ has<br />

become a permanent experience in life under all<br />

circumstances. And this is the goal of life as well as<br />

the paramarthika satya, ultimate Truth. P<br />

481

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!