Status of Coral Reefs of the World 2000
Status of Coral Reefs of the World 2000.pdf
Status of Coral Reefs of the World 2000.pdf
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Coral</strong> <strong>Reefs</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>World</strong>: <strong>2000</strong><br />
CASE STUDY 1: CHAGOS ARCHIPELAGO, CENTRAL INDIAN OCEAN<br />
An error was made in <strong>the</strong> 1998 report with no bleaching reported on Chagos. In fact<br />
<strong>the</strong>se remote reefs were severely damaged like o<strong>the</strong>rs in <strong>the</strong> Indian Ocean. The 1998 El<br />
Niño resulted in a major losses in coral cover and abundance across <strong>the</strong> Archipelago.<br />
The El Niño came at <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> a chain <strong>of</strong> events that had caused hard coral cover to<br />
decline from 50-75% (plus 10-20% s<strong>of</strong>t coral) to only 12% live cover over <strong>the</strong> last<br />
20 years. These are very remote reefs with high biodiversity (220 and 770 fish<br />
species) which experience virtually no human impacts. The 1998 ‘Hotspot’ sat over<br />
Chagos for 2 months, so that in early 1999 seaward reefs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 6 Chagos atolls had<br />
40% cover <strong>of</strong> recently dead coral and 40% bare rock. The 50% <strong>of</strong> corals lost in <strong>the</strong><br />
lagoon has turned into loose rubble. It is probable that earlier El Niño events (1982-<br />
83 and 1987-88) resulted in conversion <strong>of</strong> much live coral to rock and rubble, but <strong>the</strong><br />
1998 event caused a major sudden loss <strong>of</strong> corals. Meteorological records show a 1-2 o C<br />
rise in mean air temperature, lower annual atmospheric pressure, reduced cloud cover,<br />
and more variable winds during <strong>the</strong> last 25 years; strong evidence for global climate change.<br />
In <strong>the</strong> 1970s, seaward and lagoonal reefs had high coral cover and diversity, with many<br />
large table Acropora spp. in 5–15m depth, and A. palifera in <strong>the</strong> turbulent shallows. By<br />
February 1999, most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se corals and s<strong>of</strong>t corals were dead with only a few large<br />
Porites heads having more living than dead tissue. There were also losses <strong>of</strong> calcareous<br />
red algae, Millepora, and blue Heliopora corals from shallow areas. S<strong>of</strong>t corals were<br />
almost totally eliminated from seaward slopes after 1998, resulting in large areas <strong>of</strong><br />
bare substrate. There was much lower coral mortality on lagoon reefs, probably<br />
because <strong>the</strong>se experience large normal fluctuations in temperature and <strong>the</strong> corals<br />
presumably have adapted to higher temperatures. The massive Porites in lagoons<br />
survived better than those on ocean facing reefs.<br />
The effects on Chagos have been catastrophic, particularly for <strong>the</strong> dominant genus<br />
Acropora. In early 1999, it was possible to snorkel for 15 minutes in areas <strong>of</strong> northwestern<br />
Salomon and western Blenheim and not see any live coral amongst <strong>the</strong> stillstanding<br />
coral skeletons. Whereas before <strong>the</strong>n, <strong>the</strong>re was 50-75% cover. There were<br />
only occasional sites with more than 10% <strong>of</strong> colonies were alive, with Porites lutea and<br />
o<strong>the</strong>r similar large massive Porites species being <strong>the</strong> best survivors (average cover <strong>of</strong><br />
8% on all reefs). The immediate consequences will be a reduction in reef growth to at<br />
least 20m depth, and delayed recovery <strong>of</strong> corals and <strong>the</strong> coral community. Erosion <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> coral skeletons will produce unstable rubble and sand, which will prevent <strong>the</strong><br />
settling <strong>of</strong> new larvae from <strong>the</strong> few living parent colonies. The scale <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> losses,<br />
including coral colonies that were 200-300 years old, indicates that partial recovery<br />
will take several decades at least, and may be a few hundred years before a similar<br />
community <strong>of</strong> corals is re-established. (Charles R.C. Sheppard, 1999. <strong>Coral</strong> decline<br />
and wea<strong>the</strong>r patterns over 20 years in <strong>the</strong> Chagos Archipelago, Central Indian Ocean.<br />
Ambio, 28, 472-478, E-mail: sh@dna.bio.warwick.ac.uk.)<br />
24