Status of Coral Reefs of the World 2000
Status of Coral Reefs of the World 2000.pdf
Status of Coral Reefs of the World 2000.pdf
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Coral</strong> <strong>Reefs</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>World</strong>: <strong>2000</strong><br />
sustainable low impact aquaculture <strong>of</strong> valuable species low on <strong>the</strong> food chain, and training<br />
in coastal management. ICLARM places great importance on regular monitoring and <strong>the</strong><br />
dissemination <strong>of</strong> status reports, and has developed ReefBase as a repository for data and<br />
information on coral reefs as a key link for <strong>the</strong> GCRMN. ICLARM relies on information<br />
generated by <strong>the</strong> GCRMN to identify reefs that are not yielding potential harvests, and <strong>the</strong><br />
causes for declines. ICLARM will continue to work with <strong>the</strong> partners in expanding global<br />
monitoring and making <strong>the</strong> data accessible through ReefBase.<br />
Environmental monitoring is fundamental to informed management and policy making, and<br />
it also functions to raise public consciousness on conservation. The research priorities at<br />
<strong>the</strong> Australian Institute <strong>of</strong> Marine Science recognise <strong>the</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> monitoring <strong>the</strong> status<br />
<strong>of</strong> reefs in Australia and <strong>the</strong> region for two decades, and significant monitoring<br />
programmes on <strong>the</strong> Great Barrier Reef and on Western Australian reefs are maintained. Also<br />
considerable scientific effort has gone into developing and formalising monitoring<br />
techniques, with <strong>the</strong> Survey Manual for Tropical Marine Resources (English et al. 1997 in<br />
suggested reading) as a major product that <strong>the</strong> GCRMN has adopted as a recommended<br />
set <strong>of</strong> methods. Many coral reefs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> world are under greater pressures than those in<br />
Australia, and <strong>the</strong> GCRMN enhances <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> AIMS efforts by putting this monitoring in a<br />
global context and broadening <strong>the</strong> application methods to reefs worldwide.<br />
Since <strong>the</strong> last report, <strong>the</strong> GCRMN and Reef Check have formed a strong strategic<br />
partnership, with <strong>the</strong> GCRMN focussing on implementing monitoring in nations and states,<br />
whereas Reef Check assists communities and volunteers establish monitoring projects. This<br />
is facilitated because similar methods are used and <strong>the</strong> protocols recommend that training<br />
start with Reef Check methods and <strong>the</strong>n progress to more detailed GCRMN methods.<br />
This report demonstrates that <strong>the</strong>re has been progress in implementing global monitoring<br />
networks and providing sound information on <strong>the</strong> status <strong>of</strong> reefs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> world. But a close<br />
examination will show that <strong>the</strong>re are large regions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> world where <strong>the</strong> baseline data are<br />
insufficient to determine <strong>the</strong> status <strong>of</strong> many coral reefs. This was particularly evident after<br />
1997-98 when it was not possible to determine <strong>the</strong> impacts <strong>of</strong> a major bleaching event<br />
because <strong>of</strong> a lack <strong>of</strong> such baseline data. Monitoring now has a new role. In places where<br />
<strong>the</strong> reefs were laid bare and lost much <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> previous coral cover, <strong>the</strong>re is a need to first<br />
assess what are <strong>the</strong> probable losses <strong>of</strong> coral cover, and <strong>the</strong>n determine <strong>the</strong> amount and<br />
extent <strong>of</strong> any recovery, ei<strong>the</strong>r through <strong>the</strong> settlement <strong>of</strong> new corals or regrowth <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> few<br />
survivors. A lack <strong>of</strong> recovery will indicate to reef managers that factors preventing recovery<br />
must be removed, or rehabilitation must be considered.<br />
<strong>Coral</strong> reef monitoring should never exist on its own – ‘monitoring for monitoring sake’. It<br />
should always be a component <strong>of</strong> coral reef management, providing <strong>the</strong> data to determine<br />
suitable areas for protection and <strong>the</strong>n assist management by assessing effectiveness <strong>of</strong><br />
management decisions. This will enable resource managers to continually adjust regulations to<br />
ensure maximum sustainability without excessive interference in <strong>the</strong> lives <strong>of</strong> local communities.<br />
Therefore, <strong>the</strong>re is a need to enhance this network in those areas where monitoring is<br />
progressing, and introduce monitoring into areas without effective coverage. Moreover, it is<br />
essential that <strong>the</strong> process <strong>of</strong> monitoring be made sustainable with adequate financial and<br />
4