AAPD Plan of Action 2015.pdf
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Alliance Against Pregnancy<br />
<strong>AAPD</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Action</strong><br />
Discrimination in in the workplace<br />
A plan <strong>of</strong> action to tackle pregnancy &<br />
maternity discrimination now<br />
Seven years on from the global financial crisis <strong>of</strong> 2008 and the<br />
onset <strong>of</strong> recession, pregnancy and maternity discrimination is more<br />
common in UK workplaces than ever before: new research by the<br />
Department for Business, Innovation & Skills and Equality & Human<br />
Rights Commission indicates that as many as 54,000 pregnant<br />
women and new mothers are forced out <strong>of</strong> their jobs each year. i<br />
It is also harder than ever to challenge such discrimination: the<br />
supply <strong>of</strong> free legal advice has been severely reduced by funding<br />
cuts and the abolition <strong>of</strong> almost all civil legal aid. And, since July<br />
2013, upfront fees <strong>of</strong> up to £1,200 to pursue an employment tribunal<br />
claim for pregnancy, maternity or sex discrimination have had a<br />
devastating impact on women’s access to justice.<br />
With pregnant women, new mothers and their families also facing<br />
the biggest living standards crisis in a generation, the Alliance<br />
Against Pregnancy Discrimination believes the government must<br />
take urgent and robust action to tackle the evident proliferation <strong>of</strong><br />
pregnancy and maternity discrimination in the workplace. The scale<br />
and depth <strong>of</strong> the problem – and the detrimental impact on women,<br />
their families, and on gender equality – demands a collective<br />
response by ministers across government.<br />
Here, we set out a plan <strong>of</strong> action for ministers to ensure job security<br />
for all working women during pregnancy and maternity leave.
<strong>AAPD</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Action</strong><br />
¢<br />
Senior ministers across government should send a strong<br />
message to employers that there is simply no excuse to<br />
break the law on pregnancy and maternity discrimination. This<br />
ministerial lead should be supplemented by a high-pr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />
government information campaign aimed at improving the<br />
awareness <strong>of</strong> both workers and employers <strong>of</strong> the law, and <strong>of</strong><br />
best practice.<br />
¢<br />
The minister for women and equalities should, in collaboration<br />
with relevant stakeholders such as the members <strong>of</strong> this<br />
Alliance, lead on drawing up a cross-departmental plan for<br />
rapidly implementing the Equality & Human Rights<br />
Commission’s policy recommendations - due to published in<br />
October 2015 alongside the research study’s final reports.<br />
¢<br />
The Ministry <strong>of</strong> Justice should abolish the upfront fees for<br />
discrimination and other employment tribunal claims<br />
introduced in July 2013. There is now broad consensus that<br />
the Ministry got it badly wrong on fees, which - in the words <strong>of</strong><br />
the CBI - “should never be a barrier to justice”. With the overall<br />
number <strong>of</strong> employment tribunal cases down by 65%, and sex<br />
and pregnancy discrimination claims having fallen by 80% and<br />
40% respectively, it is now clear that the fees are little more<br />
than a charter for dinosaur and rogue employers. ii<br />
¢<br />
The Department for Business, Innovation & Skills and the<br />
Ministry <strong>of</strong> Justice should, in collaboration with relevant<br />
stakeholders, identify and swiftly implement further measures<br />
to improve compliance with employment tribunal awards,<br />
to ensure that women awarded financial compensation for<br />
pregnancy or maternity discrimination by a tribunal actually<br />
receive the money due to them. It is simply unacceptable that<br />
50% <strong>of</strong> all awards go unpaid by the employer. iii
<strong>AAPD</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Action</strong><br />
¢<br />
The Ministry <strong>of</strong> Justice should work to deliver a significant<br />
injection <strong>of</strong> funding into the specialist information and<br />
advice services that pregnant women and new mothers need<br />
to help protect their rights and entitlements.<br />
¢<br />
To ensure that all new parents receive the minimum income for<br />
healthy living (as recommended by the Marmot Review),<br />
encourage more shared parenting, and so reduce the scope for<br />
discrimination, the Department for Work & Pensions should<br />
immediately restore the real value <strong>of</strong> statutory maternity,<br />
paternity, adoption and shared parental leave pay, and <strong>of</strong><br />
maternity allowance, lost as a result <strong>of</strong> below-inflation annual<br />
up-rating since April 2013. It should then plan a programme <strong>of</strong><br />
annual increases to bring parity with the National Minimum<br />
Wage by 2020, and with the Living Wage in the longer term. It<br />
is unfair and unrealistic to expect new parents to get by on just<br />
60% <strong>of</strong> the National Minimum Wage at a time when their<br />
outgoings have increased enormously. And – in the words <strong>of</strong><br />
one small employer – it is “immoral and damaging to society to<br />
force new mothers back into work before they [are] ready”. iv<br />
¢<br />
To incentivise small employers to ‘do the right thing’ by<br />
pregnant women and assist with the associated costs (including<br />
accrual <strong>of</strong> holiday pay during maternity leave), the Department<br />
for Work & Pensions and HM Treasury should raise the rate at<br />
which small businesses can recover statutory maternity,<br />
paternity, adoption and shared parental leave pay, from the<br />
current 103% to 110%, and should act to raise awareness<br />
among small employers <strong>of</strong> the provisions for advance funding.<br />
¢<br />
The Department for Business, Innovation & Skills should use<br />
the first available legislative opportunity to create a statutory<br />
right to time-<strong>of</strong>f and facilities for breastfeeding at work, and<br />
clear legal protection against harassment or discrimination for<br />
exercising this right. v
<strong>AAPD</strong> <strong>AAPD</strong> Manifesto <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> for <strong>Action</strong> May 2015<br />
Notes<br />
i<br />
Pregnancy and Maternity-Related Discrimination and Disadvantage, First Findings:<br />
Surveys <strong>of</strong> Employers and Mothers, BIS Research Paper 235, Department for<br />
ii<br />
iii<br />
iv<br />
v<br />
In the nine-month period October 2013 to June 2014, there were just 15,750 new ET<br />
cases (single claims/cases & multiple claimant cases), down from 43,994 in the same<br />
period 12 months earlier. On average, each <strong>of</strong> the UK’s 1.2 million employers now<br />
faces an employment tribunal case just once every 58 years.<br />
See: Payment <strong>of</strong> employment tribunal awards, Department for Business, Innovation &<br />
Skills, November 2013. The Small Business, Enterprise & Employment Bill, currently<br />
before Parliament, includes a provision to impose a financial penalty on employers who<br />
fail to pay a tribunal award. However, the Alliance believes that further measures are<br />
necessary to tackle this systemic and long-standing problem.<br />
Taken from: Maternity and paternity leave and flexible working arrangements: employer<br />
perceptions, Department for Business, Innovation & Skills, March 2014.<br />
Maternity <strong>Action</strong> regularly advises breastfeeding mothers who have been told by their<br />
employer that their request for breaks or changes in their hours <strong>of</strong> work cannot be<br />
accommodated. While new Acas guidance (issued in 2013) on accommodating<br />
breastfeeding in the workplace is useful in communicating how simple it is for<br />
employers to do so, there is no legal requirement on employers to follow the guidance.<br />
A statutory right to breastfeed or express milk at work is long overdue, and would bring<br />
the UK into line with the 92 countries which do have such law in place.<br />
Published by Maternity <strong>Action</strong>, 52-54 Featherstone Street, London EC1Y 8RT<br />
Company No: 6478568 Charity No: 1128776<br />
Tel: 020 7253 2288<br />
www.maternityaction.org.uk