14.09.2015 Views

Gear Cutting Tools

Hobs - Torion

Hobs - Torion

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Shorter machining times<br />

The machining time (production<br />

time) for the hobbing process is<br />

determined on the one hand by<br />

the gear width and number of<br />

teeth and on the other by the<br />

cutting speed, hob diameter,<br />

number of starts, and axial feed.<br />

The number of starts should always<br />

be increased when the feed<br />

is limited by the depth of the feed<br />

markings before the maximum tip<br />

chip thickness is reached.<br />

The depth of the feed markings is<br />

dependent upon whether the gear<br />

is to be finish-hobbed or subsequently<br />

shaved or ground.<br />

The gear width and the number<br />

of teeth are fixed geometric<br />

values. The cutting speed is<br />

largely dependent upon the gear<br />

material, and its tensile strength<br />

and machineability.<br />

The machining time changes as a<br />

function of the hob diameter,<br />

however. With a small hob diameter<br />

and with the cutting speed<br />

unchanged, the hob spindle and<br />

table speeds increase, and the<br />

machining time is reduced. At the<br />

same time, a reduction in hob diameter<br />

results in a reduction in<br />

the machining distance for axial<br />

machining.<br />

When selecting the hob diameter,<br />

note that the number of gashes is<br />

limited by this dimension, and<br />

that a high number of gashes is<br />

required for good tool life qualities<br />

and lower cutting forces.<br />

The cutter diameter should therefore<br />

only be sufficiently small to<br />

enable a specified cycle time to<br />

be achieved. An unnecessarily<br />

small cutter diameter impairs the<br />

tool life and gear quality.<br />

High axial feeds and multi-start<br />

hobs reduce the machining time<br />

considerably. However, they also<br />

lead to higher tip chip thicknesses,<br />

the increase in which is<br />

influenced more strongly by the<br />

number of starts than by the increased<br />

axial feed.<br />

A relatively high feed should be<br />

selected, and the number of<br />

starts kept as low as possible.<br />

This combination produces the<br />

lowest tip chip thickness. The<br />

two variables are of equal importance<br />

for calculation of the machining<br />

time, i.e. the machining<br />

time is determined by the product<br />

of the feed and the number of<br />

starts.<br />

t h = z 2 · d a0 · π · (E + b + A)<br />

z 0 · f a · v c · 1000<br />

Machining time (production time) for hobbing<br />

t h [min] = machining time<br />

v c [m/min] = cutting speed<br />

z 2<br />

= number of teeth of the<br />

gear to be machined<br />

d a0 [mm] = tip circle diameter<br />

E<br />

b<br />

A<br />

z 0<br />

[mm]<br />

[mm]<br />

[mm]<br />

of the hob<br />

= approach length<br />

of the hob<br />

= tooth width of the gear<br />

to be machined<br />

= idle travel distance of the hob<br />

= number of starts of the hob<br />

f a [mm/WU] = axial feed<br />

δ y [mm] =<br />

z 0<br />

m n<br />

α n<br />

z 2<br />

i =<br />

d<br />

δ y [mm] = π2 · z 2 0 · m n · sinα n<br />

4 · z 2 · i 2<br />

δy<br />

=<br />

=<br />

=<br />

=<br />

envelop cut<br />

deviation<br />

number of starts<br />

of the hob<br />

normal module<br />

profile angle<br />

number of teeth<br />

on the gear<br />

number of gashes<br />

of the hob<br />

Envelop cut deviations<br />

22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!