PROVOCĂRI LA ADRESA SECURITĂŢII ŞI STRATEGIEI LA ÎNCEPUTUL SECOLULUI XXI

provocări la adresa securităţii şi strategiei la începutul secolului xxi provocări la adresa securităţii şi strategiei la începutul secolului xxi

13.09.2015 Views

doctrinal and planning documents: Joint Operations Doctrine, Logistics Doctrine, Training Doctrine and Doctrines for respective Branches of Service. The Military Strategy is intended to answer four main questions: 1. What factors do determine the missions and tasks assigned to the Polish Armed Forces? 2. What is the purpose and organization of the Polish Armed Forces? 3. How the missions and tasks are to be executed by the Polish Armed Forces? 4. How to ensure an efficient execution of assigned missions and tasks? The Military Strategy consists of two main parts: political and military in nature and purely military one. The first one was to be developed by the Defence Policy Department and the second one was to be elaborated on by the General Staff of the Polish Armed Forces. Armed Forces serve as an instrument of the national power designated for the efficient execution of its security policy. They are responsible for maintaining strength and capabilities necessary to prevent or to counter the causes and effects of external and internal threats and challenges to national security. Also, Armed Forces are responsible for forces dedicated to the NATO military structure and operations in the framework of the NATO and EU in accordance with official declarations of the state. The Military Strategy defines five primary missions for the Armed Forces. Each of them prescribes tasks to be accomplished in respective readiness levels regarding whole country, both internally - on the Polish territory and externally - beyond its borders. Each of the missions and tasks are presented in such a way that full spectrum of possible scenarios and situations for involvement of the Armed Forces are covered. Conclusions Poland is now in the process of the Strategic Defence Review 10 , which will serve to define Poland’s defence requirements and to adapt our armed forces to changing scenarios and new challenges. More detailed tasks for Polish Armed Forces and assumptions for further developing of its capabilities are presented in “Development and Modernisation Programme 10 For the official SDR (Strategiczny Przeglad Obronny) page, see http://www.spo.wp.mil.pl, 59 of the Polish Armed Forces in 2005-2010” 11 , which reflects the changes in the international security environment. NATO and EU commitments are a base for every activity, to develop mobile, interoperable and deployable units, able to act in every conditions. According to this document, main priorities for developing the PAF in 2005 – 2010 are to prepare units declared for NATO and UE, according to PCC commitments, to achieve NATO standards and to be capable of conducting operations out of national territory, in all weather conditions, further development of operational capabilities and effectiveness of single services and functional systems (C2, reconnaissance, air-defence), logistic and enhancing airlift capability. Poland intends to move away from the static nature of forces. They will be restructured and developed to make them capable of deployed operations, outside of Poland, across the full spectrum of Alliance and EU missions (Petersberg tasks). Consolidation and streamlining of organisational structures in years 2005-2010 will result in further changes (process of the professionalism). In the years 2005-2010, we intend to continue development of the operational capabilities necessary to counter the emerging threats, both military and non-military in nature. It will be achieved mainly through acquisition of modern military equipment and weapons systems, modernisation of armament remaining on the PAF inventory, and further improvement of component’s and system’s effectiveness 12 . Shortfalls, identified during Iraq stabilisation mission, are a part of our experience and next factor for development assumptions. While creating a military capabilities to react we have to remember, that our stability and security increasingly depend on effective multilateral and “multispectral” systems. We have to use a full spectrum of instruments: political, diplomatic, military, trade and development activities. Crucial aspect of it should be education of society, which is an essential condition of democratic stability and enduring security of every State in the accelerated processes of modernisation and globalisation 13 . We should develop a “cultural education” (“Listen to me and try to understand, what I’m saying to you, not what you want to hear”). Only with mutually understanding between states and organisation (NATO, EU, UN, OSCE) effective multilateralism can be really effective. 11 S. Czmur, L. Stefaniak „Kontynuacja z korekta”, Polska Zbrojna 2004, No 46, 16-18. 12 R. Choroszy, A. Golawski ”Wielkie zakupy”, Polska Zbrojna 2004, N0 44, 13-15. 13 A. Golawski „Armia 2010”, Polska Zbrojna 2004, No 41, 3-5. 60

OMUL – SUBIECTUL SECURITĂŢII NAŢIONALE ŞI INTERNAŢIONALE Alexandra SARCINSCHI * The human being is the main subject of security. He transcends each level and each dimension of security. The most important dangers to security - international terrorism, failed states and organized crime – are caused by the insecurity feeling of the human being provoked by the degradation of humanity, the various levels of development, the struggle for power, the diverging interests of humans and alliances etc. That is why we can not argue about the national, zonal, regional and global security in such environments in which the individual does not feel secure. The premise for our explanatory model is regarding the fact that the negative state of security is caused by the failure in the achievement of the fundamental human rights and freedom, especially the poor quality of life. I. Argument Omul, ca element fundamental al societăţii, reprezintă sursa şi resursa oricărei forme de organizare societală. Omul transcende toate graniţele dintre domeniile şi nivelurile sistemului social. În acest caz, ceea ce ar trebui să fie subliniat în studiile de securitate, însă nu în exclusivitate, este tocmai securitatea individului sau, aşa cum o denumesc unii specialişti [1], securitatea umană. Analiza securităţii umane implică analiza unor dimensiuni interrelaţionate [2], centrate pe ideea de drepturi ale omului şi care, în fapt, sunt chiar câteva dintre dimensiunile conceptului de securitate: politică, economică, socială, culturală şi ecologică. Dimensiunea militară, una dintre dimensiunile „clasice” ale securităţii, este mai puţin vizibilă la nivelul individului uman, manifestându-se pregnant de la nivelul statal spre cel global. Cele cinci dimensiuni, ce reprezintă subsisteme ale sistemului global, sunt legate prin relaţii specifice. De exemplu, dimensiunea ecologică este legată de cea economică prin resurse, cea economică de cea socială – prin forţele sociale, cea socială de cea politică – prin formele de alianţă politico-socială şi, în fine, cea politică de cea culturală – prin ideologie. Analiza de securitate, centrată doar pe aceste subsisteme, este incompletă fără a lua în calcul dimensiunea psihologică a vieţii sociale, ce transcende toate nivelurile şi dimensiunile securităţii, chiar şi pe cea militară. În opinia noastră, realizarea securităţii vizează realizarea unei stări în care este percepută absenţa riscurilor, pericolelor şi ameninţărilor la adresa existenţei, valorilor şi intereselor indivizilor umani (în orice formă de constituire), astfel că, prin existenţa intereselor şi valorilor divergente, aceştia se vor simţi într-o profundă stare de disconfort şi insecuritate. Toate sensurile existenţei umane sunt construite prin definiţii rezultate din experienţa perceptivă a indivizilor. Starea de securitate totală presupune atingerea unui nivel în care percepţia absenţei riscurilor, pericolelor şi ameninţărilor să fie absolută, or acest lucru este îngreunat atât de uriaşa varietate a valorilor şi intereselor oamenilor care, adesea, intră în contradicţie, creând temeri asupra securităţii individuale, grupale, naţionale, statale, suprastatale, cât şi de evoluţia umanităţii, ce determină schimbarea a ceea ce noi considerăm risc, pericol şi ameninţare. II. Calitatea vieţii umane – unul dintre cei mai importanţi indicatori ai stării de securitate Unul dintre cele mai importante aspecte ale vieţii umane, ce determină, în mare măsură, percepţia absenţei sau prezenţei riscurilor, pericolelor şi ameninţărilor la adresa existenţei, în ansamblu, a indivizilor umani şi care contribuie la realizarea reprezentării sociale a securităţii, este calitatea vieţii, un concept evaluativ, o rezultantă a raportării condiţiilor de viaţă şi a activităţii, care compun viaţa umană, la necesităţile, valorile şi aspiraţiile umane [3]. Se observă că acest concept se referă atât la condiţiile obiective în care se constituie viaţa umană, cât şi la modul subiectiv în care fiecare individ îşi evaluează propria viaţă. Modelul [4] ce ar putea explica corelaţia dintre calitatea vieţii şi reprezentarea socială a securităţii se întemeiază pe trei piloni interrelaţionaţi, ce determină satisfacţia cu viaţa care, la rândul său, are profunde implicaţii asupra intereselor, normelor şi valorilor la care se raportează indivizii umani (figura nr. 1). Trebuie subliniat faptul că satisfacţia cu viaţa este doar unul dintre factorii ce determină reprezentarea socială a securităţii. * Alexandra SARCINSCHI este doctorand în Ştiinţe Militare şi cercetător ştiinţific la Centrul de Studii Strategice de Apărare şi Securitate, din cadrul Universităţii Naţionale de Apărare. 61 62

doctrinal and planning documents: Joint Operations Doctrine, Logistics<br />

Doctrine, Training Doctrine and Doctrines for respective Branches of<br />

Service.<br />

The Military Strategy is intended to answer four main questions:<br />

1. What factors do determine the missions and tasks assigned to the<br />

Polish Armed Forces?<br />

2. What is the purpose and organization of the Polish Armed<br />

Forces?<br />

3. How the missions and tasks are to be executed by the Polish<br />

Armed Forces?<br />

4. How to ensure an efficient execution of assigned missions and<br />

tasks?<br />

The Military Strategy consists of two main parts: political and<br />

military in nature and purely military one. The first one was to be developed<br />

by the Defence Policy Department and the second one was to be elaborated<br />

on by the General Staff of the Polish Armed Forces. Armed Forces serve as<br />

an instrument of the national power designated for the efficient execution of<br />

its security policy. They are responsible for maintaining strength and<br />

capabilities necessary to prevent or to counter the causes and effects of<br />

external and internal threats and challenges to national security. Also,<br />

Armed Forces are responsible for forces dedicated to the NATO military<br />

structure and operations in the framework of the NATO and EU in<br />

accordance with official declarations of the state.<br />

The Military Strategy defines five primary missions for the Armed<br />

Forces. Each of them prescribes tasks to be accomplished in respective<br />

readiness levels regarding whole country, both internally - on the Polish<br />

territory and externally - beyond its borders. Each of the missions and tasks<br />

are presented in such a way that full spectrum of possible scenarios and<br />

situations for involvement of the Armed Forces are covered.<br />

Conclusions<br />

Poland is now in the process of the Strategic Defence Review 10 ,<br />

which will serve to define Poland’s defence requirements and to adapt our<br />

armed forces to changing scenarios and new challenges. More detailed tasks<br />

for Polish Armed Forces and assumptions for further developing of its<br />

capabilities are presented in “Development and Modernisation Programme<br />

10 For the official SDR (Strategiczny Przeglad Obronny) page, see http://www.spo.wp.mil.pl,<br />

59<br />

of the Polish Armed Forces in 2005-2010” 11 , which reflects the changes in<br />

the international security environment. NATO and EU commitments are a<br />

base for every activity, to develop mobile, interoperable and deployable<br />

units, able to act in every conditions. According to this document, main<br />

priorities for developing the PAF in 2005 – 2010 are to prepare units<br />

declared for NATO and UE, according to PCC commitments, to achieve<br />

NATO standards and to be capable of conducting operations out of national<br />

territory, in all weather conditions, further development of operational<br />

capabilities and effectiveness of single services and functional systems (C2,<br />

reconnaissance, air-defence), logistic and enhancing airlift capability.<br />

Poland intends to move away from the static nature of forces. They<br />

will be restructured and developed to make them capable of deployed<br />

operations, outside of Poland, across the full spectrum of Alliance and EU<br />

missions (Petersberg tasks). Consolidation and streamlining of<br />

organisational structures in years 2005-2010 will result in further changes<br />

(process of the professionalism). In the years 2005-2010, we intend to<br />

continue development of the operational capabilities necessary to counter<br />

the emerging threats, both military and non-military in nature. It will be<br />

achieved mainly through acquisition of modern military equipment and<br />

weapons systems, modernisation of armament remaining on the PAF<br />

inventory, and further improvement of component’s and system’s<br />

effectiveness 12 . Shortfalls, identified during Iraq stabilisation mission, are a<br />

part of our experience and next factor for development assumptions. While<br />

creating a military capabilities to react we have to remember, that our<br />

stability and security increasingly depend on effective multilateral and<br />

“multispectral” systems. We have to use a full spectrum of instruments:<br />

political, diplomatic, military, trade and development activities. Crucial<br />

aspect of it should be education of society, which is an essential condition of<br />

democratic stability and enduring security of every State in the accelerated<br />

processes of modernisation and globalisation 13 . We should develop a<br />

“cultural education” (“Listen to me and try to understand, what I’m saying<br />

to you, not what you want to hear”). Only with mutually understanding<br />

between states and organisation (NATO, EU, UN, OSCE) effective<br />

multilateralism can be really effective.<br />

11 S. Czmur, L. Stefaniak „Kontynuacja z korekta”, Polska Zbrojna 2004, No 46, 16-18.<br />

12 R. Choroszy, A. Golawski ”Wielkie zakupy”, Polska Zbrojna 2004, N0 44, 13-15.<br />

13 A. Golawski „Armia 2010”, Polska Zbrojna 2004, No 41, 3-5.<br />

60

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!