12.09.2015 Views

Updating Bituminous Stabilized Materials Guidelines Mix Design Report Phase II

Moisture Sensitivity: Part II (Validation) - Asphalt Academy

Moisture Sensitivity: Part II (Validation) - Asphalt Academy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure J.22 illustrates the comparison of the strength reduction of BSMs from dry trafficking to<br />

wet trafficking conditions. The wet trafficking ITS shows a decrease in strength from dry<br />

trafficking ITS. However the comparison of the ITS values shows no significant difference for<br />

most of the BSMs tested, with some exceptions i.e. BSM-emulsion with Quartzites. This indicates<br />

that ITS test is not particularly sensitive to moisture effects.<br />

From previous analysis, see Section 4.1, the resistance to disintegration and ravelling by a long<br />

cured BSM-emulsion, indicated high moisture resistance. However, looking at the ITS values, the<br />

difference between highly moisture resistant to highly moisture susceptible BSMs is insignificant.<br />

This confirm the weakness of the ITS test, as reported previously by Hodgkinson, (2004). The<br />

lack of reliability and repeatability of the ITS test for use in ranking BSMs in terms of moisture<br />

susceptibility, should preclude its use for important applications of BSMs.<br />

ITS [kPa]<br />

400<br />

350<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

H+1C-E01 (long cured<br />

G2+0C-E02<br />

G2+1C-E01<br />

G2+0C-F01<br />

H+0C-E01<br />

BSM-<strong>Mix</strong>es<br />

Q+0C-E04<br />

H+1C-E02<br />

H+1L-E02<br />

Wet Trafficked ITS<br />

Dry Trafficked ITS<br />

Figure J.22: Comparison of ITS results after wet and dry MMLS3<br />

trafficking on different BSMs<br />

Further, comparison of the ITS values shows an increase in the moisture-sensitivity of the BSMs<br />

from initial study to additional study. However, it should be noted that in the initial study, wet<br />

trafficking terminated at 250 and 900 load applications after ravelling depth of 2mm to 4mm,<br />

while in the additional study, wet trafficking terminated at a 2500 and 45000 load application<br />

after ravelling-depth of 4mm to 12-14mm.<br />

Ravelling-depth of 4mm under the MMLS3 appears to be critical, see Figure J.20 and Figure<br />

J.21. At 4mm of ravelling BSMs experiences severe cohesion loss of stiffness reduction.<br />

Thereafter exponential disintegration occurs. It is appropriate to extend testing beyond 4mm of<br />

ravelling during moisture susceptibility testing with the MMLS3 trafficking.<br />

28

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!