STATE COMMITTEE EVALUATION FORM

More documents

Recommendations

Info

LEARNING I. Universal Design for Curriculum Access Florida's Perspective How well does this submission incorporate stratgies, materials, activities, etc., that consider the needs of all students? SUMMARY ANALYSIS FOR LEARNING In general, how well does the submission satisfy LEARNING requirements? RATING Thoroughly Highly Adequately Minimally Not at All Thoroughly Highly Adequately Minimally Not at All COMMENTS
OVERALL <strong>EVALUATION</strong> 1. Does the major tool provide instructional content and student learning activities for -each of the Next Generation Sunshine State Standards (NGSSS) benchmarks that are in the Florida course descriptions? OR -the course objectives as outlined by the College Board for an Advanced Placement (AP) course? 2. Does the submission include all benchmarks and benchmark codes at point of use in both the student and teacher major tool? (Leave blank for AP.) 3. No more than 10% of the content in the major tool can address concepts outside the realm of the required benchmarks for the grade or course for which it is being submitted. Was this requirement met? (Leave blank for AP) 4. Does the submission meet the time requirement as specified in the course description? RATING Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No COMMENTS 5. Are all the ancillaries submitted designed to work with the major tool? Yes No 6. What notation (if any) do you think should be included in the Catalog? (e.g. these materials would also be appropriate for...; these materials are especially suited for...) Yes No
Page 1 and 2: STATE COMMITTEE EVALUATION FORM Gui
Page 3 and 4: CONTENT RATING COMMENTS I. Discipli
Page 5: LEARNING C. Explicit Instruction Ho

STATE COMMITTEE EVALUATION FORM

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?