The Meme Machine
TheMemeMachine1999
TheMemeMachine1999
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
THE BIG BRAIN 75<br />
initiated and driven by memes.<br />
I shall explore this new theory in two ways, first by rather speculatively<br />
looking at our origins again, and then by examining in more detail the processes<br />
of memetic driving.<br />
<strong>The</strong> turning point was when early hominids began to imitate each other. <strong>The</strong><br />
origins of imitation itself are lost in our far past, but the selective (genetic)<br />
advantage of imitation is no mystery. Imitation may be very difficult to do but<br />
is certainly a ‘good trick’ if you can acquire it. If your neighbour has learned<br />
something really useful – like which foods to eat and which to avoid, or how to<br />
get inside a prickly pine cone – it may pay (in biological terms) to copy him.<br />
You can then avoid all the slow and potentially dangerous process of trying out<br />
new foods for yourself. This is only worthwhile if the environment does not<br />
change too fast, a factor that can be modelled mathematically. Richerson and<br />
Boyd (1992) have shown the conditions under which natural selection might<br />
favour more reliance on social learning (including imitation) rather than<br />
individual learning. Economists have devised models of how optimisers (who<br />
incur the cost of making a decisions) can coexist with imitators (who avoid the<br />
cost but make inferior decisions) and studied how fads and fashions result when<br />
large numbers of people all imitate each other (Bikhchandani et al. 1992;<br />
Conlisk 1980). Indeed, fads and fashions have been associated with imitation<br />
ever since Charles Mackay (1841) blamed such ‘extraordinary popular<br />
delusions’ as the South Sea Bubble and the Dutch seventeenth-century mania for<br />
tulips on ‘popular imitativeness’.<br />
But why did generalised imitation apparently evolve only once? We know,<br />
from studies of other animals, already discussed, that social learning is fairly<br />
common in the animal kingdom but true imitation is very rare. Why should it<br />
have arisen in early hominids rather than any other kind of animal?<br />
I suggested that imitation requires three skills: making decisions about what<br />
to imitate, complex transformations from one point of view to another, and the<br />
production of matching bodily actions. <strong>The</strong>se basic skills, or at least the<br />
beginnings of them, are available in many primates and were probably available<br />
to our ancestors of 5 million years ago. Primates have good motor control and<br />
hand co-ordination, and good general intelligence which would enable them to<br />
classify actions and decide what to imitate. Some of them can imagine events<br />
and manipulate them mentally, as is shown by their use of insight to solve such<br />
problems as reaching food with sticks or by piling up boxes, and, most notably,<br />
they have Machiavellian Intelligence and the beginnings of a theory of mind.