08.09.2015 Views

The Meme Machine

TheMemeMachine1999

TheMemeMachine1999

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE BIG BRAIN 75<br />

initiated and driven by memes.<br />

I shall explore this new theory in two ways, first by rather speculatively<br />

looking at our origins again, and then by examining in more detail the processes<br />

of memetic driving.<br />

<strong>The</strong> turning point was when early hominids began to imitate each other. <strong>The</strong><br />

origins of imitation itself are lost in our far past, but the selective (genetic)<br />

advantage of imitation is no mystery. Imitation may be very difficult to do but<br />

is certainly a ‘good trick’ if you can acquire it. If your neighbour has learned<br />

something really useful – like which foods to eat and which to avoid, or how to<br />

get inside a prickly pine cone – it may pay (in biological terms) to copy him.<br />

You can then avoid all the slow and potentially dangerous process of trying out<br />

new foods for yourself. This is only worthwhile if the environment does not<br />

change too fast, a factor that can be modelled mathematically. Richerson and<br />

Boyd (1992) have shown the conditions under which natural selection might<br />

favour more reliance on social learning (including imitation) rather than<br />

individual learning. Economists have devised models of how optimisers (who<br />

incur the cost of making a decisions) can coexist with imitators (who avoid the<br />

cost but make inferior decisions) and studied how fads and fashions result when<br />

large numbers of people all imitate each other (Bikhchandani et al. 1992;<br />

Conlisk 1980). Indeed, fads and fashions have been associated with imitation<br />

ever since Charles Mackay (1841) blamed such ‘extraordinary popular<br />

delusions’ as the South Sea Bubble and the Dutch seventeenth-century mania for<br />

tulips on ‘popular imitativeness’.<br />

But why did generalised imitation apparently evolve only once? We know,<br />

from studies of other animals, already discussed, that social learning is fairly<br />

common in the animal kingdom but true imitation is very rare. Why should it<br />

have arisen in early hominids rather than any other kind of animal?<br />

I suggested that imitation requires three skills: making decisions about what<br />

to imitate, complex transformations from one point of view to another, and the<br />

production of matching bodily actions. <strong>The</strong>se basic skills, or at least the<br />

beginnings of them, are available in many primates and were probably available<br />

to our ancestors of 5 million years ago. Primates have good motor control and<br />

hand co-ordination, and good general intelligence which would enable them to<br />

classify actions and decide what to imitate. Some of them can imagine events<br />

and manipulate them mentally, as is shown by their use of insight to solve such<br />

problems as reaching food with sticks or by piling up boxes, and, most notably,<br />

they have Machiavellian Intelligence and the beginnings of a theory of mind.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!