The Meme Machine
TheMemeMachine1999
TheMemeMachine1999
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
72 THE MEME MACHINE<br />
and ability to hold down a job were ruined, he could still walk and talk and, at<br />
least to some extent, appeared normal. <strong>The</strong> same is true of the victims of frontal<br />
lobotomy, a crude operation that destroyed parts of the frontal cortex and was<br />
once used to control serious psychiatric cases. <strong>The</strong>y there never ‘themselves’<br />
again but the changes were subtle considering the vast amounts of brain damage<br />
caused in this horrible ‘treatment’. <strong>The</strong>re are numerous theories of the function<br />
of the frontal lobes but none is universally accepted. We cannot find out why<br />
our large brains evolved by appealing to the function of the part that was<br />
enlarged the most.<br />
Apart from the massive increase in the frontal lobes, the brain has been<br />
reorganised in other ways. For example, there are two main cortical areas that<br />
are critical for language, Broca’s area which is responsible for speech<br />
production, and Wernicke’s area which is responsible for language<br />
understanding. Interestingly, these two areas seem to have evolved from the<br />
motor cortex and auditory cortex, respectively. Most sounds made by other<br />
animals, from grunts to calls and birdsongs are produced in the midbrain, by<br />
areas closely connected to those controlling emotional responses and general<br />
arousal levels. Some human sounds, such as crying and laughing, are also<br />
produced by midbrain areas, but speech is controlled from the cortex. In most<br />
people both of the main language areas are in the left hemisphere, so that the two<br />
halves of our brains are not the same. Most of us are right-handed, meaning that<br />
our left hemisphere is dominant. Although some apes show handedness most do<br />
not and there is nothing like our systematic brain asymmetry in other primates.<br />
Clearly, our brains have changed in many ways other than just size.<br />
I have described very briefly what needs to be explained – that over a period<br />
of about 2.5 million years hominid brains steadily increased in size, an increase<br />
that carries obvious costs and must have been driven by a powerful selection<br />
pressure. But we do not know what that pressure was.<br />
<strong>The</strong>ories of the big brain<br />
<strong>The</strong>ories abound. Most early theories suggested that toolmaking and<br />
technological advances drove the need for a larger brain. For theories of this<br />
kind the selection pressure came from the physical environment and from other<br />
animals. Human brains were needed to outwit their prey. Tools provided<br />
obvious advantages and bigger brains could make better tools. Among problems<br />
for this kind of theory are that the increase in brain size seems to be out of all