The Meme Machine
TheMemeMachine1999
TheMemeMachine1999
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
CHAPTER 6<br />
<strong>The</strong> big brain<br />
<strong>The</strong> human brain is enormous. Why? Nobody knows for sure. Certainly there<br />
have been many theories of the origins of the huge human brain, but still none is<br />
universally accepted and a mystery remains. Most theorists assume that the big<br />
brain must have evolved by natural selection, such as the American<br />
neuroscientist and anthropologist Terrence Deacon (1997) who ways ‘It cannot<br />
be doubted that such a robust and persistent trend in brain structure evolution<br />
reflects forces of natural selection’ (p. 344) – but if so we must be able to<br />
identify the selection pressures involved. So what are they? <strong>The</strong> answer is not<br />
obvious, and the explanatory task to be performed is great. It is basically this.<br />
Origins of the human brain<br />
Human brains today are capable of extraordinary feats quite beyond the abilities<br />
of any other species on the planet. Not only do we have language but we have<br />
invented fridge-freezers, the internal combustion engine and rocket technology;<br />
we can (well, some of us can) play chess, tennis and Mega-Death 6; we listen to<br />
music, dance and sing; and we have created democracy, social security systems<br />
and the stock market. What possible evolutionary advantage could these things<br />
have? Or more precisely what selective advantage could there have been for a<br />
brain capable of such things? We seem to have a brain ‘surplus to requirements,<br />
surplus to adaptive needs’ (Cronin 1991, p. 355).<br />
In Darwin’s time this question so vexed Alfred Russel Wallace that, despite<br />
having independently discovered the principle of natural selection, he concluded<br />
that it could not account for man’s higher abilities (Wallace 1891). Primitive<br />
hunter-gatherers could not possibly have needed brains such as these, he<br />
reasoned, so there must have been some kind of supernatural intervention.<br />
Wallace supported the spiritualists who were claiming to be able to<br />
communicate with the surviving spirits of the dead, while Darwin fought against<br />
them. Wallace believed that the intellectual and spiritual nature of man was so<br />
far above that of the animals that we were different in kind from them.<br />
Although our bodies were developed by continuous modification of ancestral