08.09.2015 Views

The Meme Machine

TheMemeMachine1999

TheMemeMachine1999

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 6<br />

<strong>The</strong> big brain<br />

<strong>The</strong> human brain is enormous. Why? Nobody knows for sure. Certainly there<br />

have been many theories of the origins of the huge human brain, but still none is<br />

universally accepted and a mystery remains. Most theorists assume that the big<br />

brain must have evolved by natural selection, such as the American<br />

neuroscientist and anthropologist Terrence Deacon (1997) who ways ‘It cannot<br />

be doubted that such a robust and persistent trend in brain structure evolution<br />

reflects forces of natural selection’ (p. 344) – but if so we must be able to<br />

identify the selection pressures involved. So what are they? <strong>The</strong> answer is not<br />

obvious, and the explanatory task to be performed is great. It is basically this.<br />

Origins of the human brain<br />

Human brains today are capable of extraordinary feats quite beyond the abilities<br />

of any other species on the planet. Not only do we have language but we have<br />

invented fridge-freezers, the internal combustion engine and rocket technology;<br />

we can (well, some of us can) play chess, tennis and Mega-Death 6; we listen to<br />

music, dance and sing; and we have created democracy, social security systems<br />

and the stock market. What possible evolutionary advantage could these things<br />

have? Or more precisely what selective advantage could there have been for a<br />

brain capable of such things? We seem to have a brain ‘surplus to requirements,<br />

surplus to adaptive needs’ (Cronin 1991, p. 355).<br />

In Darwin’s time this question so vexed Alfred Russel Wallace that, despite<br />

having independently discovered the principle of natural selection, he concluded<br />

that it could not account for man’s higher abilities (Wallace 1891). Primitive<br />

hunter-gatherers could not possibly have needed brains such as these, he<br />

reasoned, so there must have been some kind of supernatural intervention.<br />

Wallace supported the spiritualists who were claiming to be able to<br />

communicate with the surviving spirits of the dead, while Darwin fought against<br />

them. Wallace believed that the intellectual and spiritual nature of man was so<br />

far above that of the animals that we were different in kind from them.<br />

Although our bodies were developed by continuous modification of ancestral

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!