08.09.2015 Views

The Meme Machine

TheMemeMachine1999

TheMemeMachine1999

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

TAKING THE MEME’S EYE VIEW 47<br />

Imitation, contagion, and social learning<br />

<strong>The</strong> psychologist, Edward Lee Thorndike (1898), was possibly the first to<br />

provide a clear definition of imitation as ‘learning to do an act from seeing it<br />

done’. Thorndike’s definition (although confined to visual information) captures<br />

the essential idea that in imitation a new behaviour is learned by copying it from<br />

someone else. A hundred years later we can see the importance of this point in<br />

distinguishing between contagion, ‘social learning’ and ‘true imitation’.<br />

<strong>The</strong> term ‘contagion’ is used in many different ways. We may think of ideas<br />

as contagious, and compare the spread of memes with the spread of infectious or<br />

contagious diseases (Lynch 1996). Also the term ‘social contagion’ is used to<br />

describe the spread of behaviours, such as crazes or even suicide, through<br />

society (Levy and Nail 1993; Marsden 1998). However, this is not the kind of<br />

contagion I want to contrast with imitation. Rather, I mean what has variously<br />

been called instinctive imitation, behavioural contagion, social facilitation, coaction,<br />

or (simply) contagion (Whiten and Ham 1992). Unfortunately, social<br />

psychologists often confuse imitation and contagion, or treat them as the same<br />

thing (Grosser et al. 1951; Levy and Nail 1993). However, comparative<br />

psychologists (those comparing animal and human behaviour) have recently<br />

made clear a useful distinction.<br />

Yawning, coughing and laughter are all extremely contagious in humans.<br />

Indeed, it can be difficult not to laugh if everyone around you is already<br />

laughing. This kind of contagion is thought to rely on specific stimulus feature<br />

detectors which detect laughing or yawning in someone else and then trigger the<br />

same innate behaviour as the response. In other animals, alarm calls and other<br />

vocalisations can be contagious, but contagious laughter appears to be limited to<br />

humans (Provine 1996). Other examples include the spread of moods and<br />

emotions through crowds, and the way people will stop to look at something if<br />

they see other people staring.<br />

This kind of contagion is not true imitation. We can see why by considering<br />

Thorndike’s simple definition. Yawning, coughing, laughing, and looking are<br />

innate behaviours. When we start laughing because everyone else is laughing<br />

we have not learned ‘how to do an act’. We already know how to laugh, and the<br />

kind of laugh we make is not modelled on the laugh we hear. So this kind of<br />

contagion is not imitation and should not be counted as memetic.<br />

<strong>The</strong>n there is social learning (as opposed to individual learning), which is

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!