The Meme Machine
TheMemeMachine1999
TheMemeMachine1999
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
40 THE MEME MACHINE<br />
Mithen 1996; Tudge 1995). <strong>The</strong>y tend to agree that people lived in groups of<br />
roughly 100–250 people, with strong family ties and complex social rules.<br />
Women tended to gather the plant foods and men to hunt. Life expectancy was<br />
short compared with today. Density of population was limited by the large area<br />
of land needed for this lifestyle and there were predators and disease to worry<br />
about. However, providing the food would not take all day and there would<br />
have been many hours left over.<br />
In such a situation would it make sense to keep on thinking all the time?<br />
Should those endless thoughts have justified their energy costs in terms of<br />
survival advantage? Or would it have been better to save the energy and be able<br />
just to sit and not think – as cats appear to do when resting in the sun? I am only<br />
speculating but I would suggest that it may have benefited the genes more if we<br />
could stop thinking sometimes and conserve valuable resources. Why, then, can<br />
we not?<br />
<strong>The</strong> answer from memetics is to start thinking in terms of replicators trying to<br />
get copied.<br />
First, let us think about brains without memes. If the brain really is a Darwin<br />
machine then the thoughts, perceptions, ideas, memories, and so on, that go on<br />
inside it must all be competing for the brain’s limited processing resources.<br />
Natural selection will have ensured that the brain’s attention mechanisms<br />
generally devote most resources to the processing that helps the genes that made<br />
it. Within those constraints, all the thoughts and ideas will compete for attention<br />
and the chance to get copied. However, they are limited to one brain and subject<br />
to the pressures of natural selection.<br />
Now imagine a brain capable of imitation – a brain with memes. A brain<br />
with memes not only has much more information to store, but the memes<br />
themselves are tools for thinking with (Dennett 1991). Far more kinds of<br />
thinking are possible when you have learned words, stories, the structure of<br />
arguments, or new ways of thinking about love, logic or science. <strong>The</strong>re are now<br />
far more thoughts competing for the same limited processing capacity of the<br />
brain. Not only that, but memes can also get copied from one brain to another.<br />
If a meme can get itself successfully copied it will. One way to do so is to<br />
command the resources of someone’s brain and make them keep on rehearsing<br />
it, so giving that meme a competitive edge over memes that do not get rehearsed.<br />
<strong>Meme</strong>s like this are not only more likely to be remembered but also to be ‘on<br />
your mind’ when you next speak to someone else. If we take stories as an<br />
example, a story that has great emotional impact, or for any other reason has the