08.09.2015 Views

The Meme Machine

TheMemeMachine1999

TheMemeMachine1999

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 3<br />

<strong>The</strong> evolution of culture<br />

From the early days of Darwinism analogies have been drawn between<br />

biological evolution and the evolution of culture. Darwin’s contemporary<br />

Herbert Spencer studied the evolution of civilisations, which he viewed as<br />

progressing towards an ideal something like that of Victorian English society.<br />

Lewis Morgan’s evolutionary theory of society included the three stages of<br />

savagery, barbarism and civilisation. <strong>The</strong> historian Arnold Toynbee used<br />

evolutionary ideas in identifying over thirty distinct civilisations some of which<br />

were derived from others and some of which went extinct, and even Karl Marx<br />

used evolutionary analogies in his analysis of society. Fifty years after Darwin,<br />

the American psychologist James Baldwin said that natural selection was not<br />

merely a law of biology but applied to all the sciences of life and mind, an early<br />

version of Universal Darwinism (Baldwin 1909), and he coined the term ‘social<br />

heredity’ to describe the way individuals learn from society by imitation and<br />

instruction (Baldwin 1896).<br />

In some ways it is obvious that ideas and cultures evolve – that is, changes<br />

are gradual and build on what went before. Ideas spread from one place to<br />

another and from one person to another (Sperber 1990). Inventions do not<br />

spring out of nowhere but depend on previous inventions, and so on. However,<br />

truly Darwinian explanations require more than just the idea of accumulating<br />

changes over time. As we shall see, some theories of cultural evolution are little<br />

more than this idea; others try to specify a mechanism but still come back to<br />

biological evolution as the only driving force, while just a few involve the<br />

concept of a second replicator as memetics does. This is what makes memetics<br />

so distinctive and so powerful. <strong>The</strong> whole point of a memetic theory of cultural<br />

evolution is to treat memes as replicators in their own right. This means that<br />

memetic selection drives the evolution of ideas in the interests of replicating<br />

memes, not the genes. This is the big difference that separates memetics from<br />

most previous theories of cultural evolution.<br />

Language provides a good example of cultural evolution. Darwin pointed<br />

out the parallel between species and different languages: ‘We find in distinct<br />

languages striking homologies due to community of descent, and analogies due<br />

to a similar process of formation . . . A language, like a species, when extinct,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!