The Meme Machine
TheMemeMachine1999
TheMemeMachine1999
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
200 THE MEME MACHINE<br />
them in heaven. A society in which brave young men are prepared to die for<br />
their beliefs is likely to win a war against a society in which they are more<br />
concerned about protecting themselves or avenging their family. Such a victory<br />
is a victory for the memes that created the difference in the first place, and for<br />
the genes of the survivors.<br />
We can now see why group selection might be important in memetics.<br />
Religions are a good example of a mechanism that decreases within-group<br />
differences, while increasing between-group differences and rates of group<br />
extinction. In many religions conformity is encouraged, forbidden behaviours<br />
are punished, differences between believers and unbelievers are exaggerated,<br />
fear or hatred of people with other beliefs is nurtured, and migration to a<br />
different religion made difficult or impossible. Wars between religious groups<br />
are common and in our evolutionary history many groups have lived or died for<br />
their religion. All this makes it more likely that group selection has occurred. If<br />
there were genetic differences between the groups to start with, then the survival<br />
of some groups and extinction of others would have had effects on the gene<br />
pool. In this case we could say that the religious memes have driven the genes.<br />
This is likely to be most interesting if, for example, there was some genetic<br />
reason why one group took up one religion while a different group took up a<br />
different religion. Let us imagine two neighbouring groups of early hominids in<br />
which, by chance, one group had more of a genetic tendency to want to bury<br />
their dead in elaborate ways. This is not at all far-fetched if you remember that<br />
digging and burying behaviour is under genetic control in many species, from<br />
worms and wasps to rabbits and dogs. This genetic propensity then encouraged<br />
these people to develop a religion based on ancestor worship and an afterlife –<br />
we can call them the ‘Afterlifers’. Meanwhile, the other group developed a<br />
religion based on worshipping nature spirits – we can call them the ‘Naturists’.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Afterlifers then developed a taste for war, believing their ancestors’ spirits<br />
would aid them, and that they would individually go to heaven if they killed an<br />
enemy, whereas the Naturists just got on with their own interests. In<br />
consequence, the Afterlifers won more of the wars against the Naturists; their<br />
memes spread – and so did their genes. Genes for the original ritual burying<br />
behaviour were selected for by group selection driven by memes.<br />
I am not suggesting that this precise series of events has actually happened,<br />
but that this general mechanism could have shaped human nature and given us<br />
our religious tendencies. <strong>The</strong> principle is a general one and could theoretically<br />
apply to all kinds of genetic predispositions, such as conformity, having