08.09.2015 Views

The Meme Machine

TheMemeMachine1999

TheMemeMachine1999

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

196 THE MEME MACHINE<br />

these are typically rulers of various kinds, together with soldiers and priests.<br />

Diamond (1997) argues that the function of ideologies and religions in<br />

chiefdoms is to justify the redistribution of wealth, the authority of the rulers,<br />

and warfare. Chiefs typically take enormous amounts of wealth from working<br />

people and use some of it to build grand temples or public works as visible signs<br />

of their power. <strong>The</strong> people may accept their wealth being taken from them, as<br />

they accept taxation in modern societies, if they obtain benefits in return. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

benefits may include the reduction of violence within the society, protection<br />

from enemies, or facilities for public use. Sometimes the ruler and priest are the<br />

same person, but in larger societies separate priests take on the religious<br />

functions. <strong>The</strong> priests promote and police the religious beliefs; the beliefs are<br />

then used to justify the conquest of other peoples from whom more goods and<br />

power can be stolen.<br />

In memetic terms what this amounts to is that the religious memes are more<br />

likely to survive and replicate than competing memes are. For example,<br />

religions that required no priests, that took no taxes, or that built no impressive<br />

buildings, would have been at a disadvantage. This meant the proliferation of<br />

highly organised and stratified societies and of priests who taught and<br />

maintained the religion. Religious memes have therefore played an important<br />

role in the development of human societies.<br />

<strong>The</strong> coevolutionary question is whether they have affected the genes along<br />

the way. E. O. Wilson (1978) treated religions as a challenge to his new science<br />

of sociobiology and speculated about the ways in which religious belief could<br />

provide a genetic advantage. For example, religions often include prohibitions<br />

against eating potentially contaminated foods, and against incest and other risky<br />

sexual activities, and encourage believers to have large and well-protected<br />

families. In these and other ways religious belief would benefit the genes of<br />

believers and so be expected to continue. <strong>The</strong> evolutionary psychologist Steven<br />

Pinker (1997) has argued that religious beliefs are by-products of the brain<br />

modules that were designed to do other things; spirits and gods are based on our<br />

concepts of animals and people; supernatural powers are inferred from natural<br />

powers; the idea of other worlds is based on dreams and trances. As he puts it:<br />

‘religious beliefs are notable for their lack of imagination (God is a jealous man;<br />

heaven and hell are places; souls are people who have sprouted wings)’ (Pinker<br />

1997, p. 557). <strong>The</strong>se authors argue either that religions provide a genetic<br />

advantage, or that they are the by-product of things that once provided genetic<br />

advantage. <strong>The</strong>y do not consider the possibility of memetic advantage, nor of<br />

memes driving genes.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!