The Meme Machine
TheMemeMachine1999
TheMemeMachine1999
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
196 THE MEME MACHINE<br />
these are typically rulers of various kinds, together with soldiers and priests.<br />
Diamond (1997) argues that the function of ideologies and religions in<br />
chiefdoms is to justify the redistribution of wealth, the authority of the rulers,<br />
and warfare. Chiefs typically take enormous amounts of wealth from working<br />
people and use some of it to build grand temples or public works as visible signs<br />
of their power. <strong>The</strong> people may accept their wealth being taken from them, as<br />
they accept taxation in modern societies, if they obtain benefits in return. <strong>The</strong>se<br />
benefits may include the reduction of violence within the society, protection<br />
from enemies, or facilities for public use. Sometimes the ruler and priest are the<br />
same person, but in larger societies separate priests take on the religious<br />
functions. <strong>The</strong> priests promote and police the religious beliefs; the beliefs are<br />
then used to justify the conquest of other peoples from whom more goods and<br />
power can be stolen.<br />
In memetic terms what this amounts to is that the religious memes are more<br />
likely to survive and replicate than competing memes are. For example,<br />
religions that required no priests, that took no taxes, or that built no impressive<br />
buildings, would have been at a disadvantage. This meant the proliferation of<br />
highly organised and stratified societies and of priests who taught and<br />
maintained the religion. Religious memes have therefore played an important<br />
role in the development of human societies.<br />
<strong>The</strong> coevolutionary question is whether they have affected the genes along<br />
the way. E. O. Wilson (1978) treated religions as a challenge to his new science<br />
of sociobiology and speculated about the ways in which religious belief could<br />
provide a genetic advantage. For example, religions often include prohibitions<br />
against eating potentially contaminated foods, and against incest and other risky<br />
sexual activities, and encourage believers to have large and well-protected<br />
families. In these and other ways religious belief would benefit the genes of<br />
believers and so be expected to continue. <strong>The</strong> evolutionary psychologist Steven<br />
Pinker (1997) has argued that religious beliefs are by-products of the brain<br />
modules that were designed to do other things; spirits and gods are based on our<br />
concepts of animals and people; supernatural powers are inferred from natural<br />
powers; the idea of other worlds is based on dreams and trances. As he puts it:<br />
‘religious beliefs are notable for their lack of imagination (God is a jealous man;<br />
heaven and hell are places; souls are people who have sprouted wings)’ (Pinker<br />
1997, p. 557). <strong>The</strong>se authors argue either that religions provide a genetic<br />
advantage, or that they are the by-product of things that once provided genetic<br />
advantage. <strong>The</strong>y do not consider the possibility of memetic advantage, nor of<br />
memes driving genes.