The Meme Machine
TheMemeMachine1999
TheMemeMachine1999
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
154 THE MEME MACHINE<br />
for avoiding it. Evolutionary psychologists might argue that our emotional<br />
system was designed for the hunter-gatherer lifestyle and must be expected to go<br />
wrong (and perhaps to produce excess generosity) in a rich technological world.<br />
Perhaps the knowledge that ‘I will never ever see this person again’ is no match<br />
for underlying emotions programmed by the genes in times past, but then we are<br />
back to explaining away our behaviour as just a mistake.<br />
So is there an alternative?<br />
Until now there have been only two major choices in accounting for altruism.<br />
<strong>The</strong> first is to say that all apparent altruism actually (even if remotely) comes<br />
back to advantage to the genes. On this view there is no ‘true’ altruism at all –<br />
or rather, what looks like true altruism is just the mistakes that natural selection<br />
has not managed to eradicate. That is the sociobiological explanation. <strong>The</strong><br />
second has been to try to rescue ‘true’ altruism and propose some kind of extra<br />
something in human beings – a true morality, an independent moral conscience,<br />
a spiritual essence or a religious nature that somehow overcomes selfishness and<br />
the dictates of our genes; a view that finds little favour with most scientists who<br />
want to understand how human behaviour works without invoking magic.<br />
Neither choice appears satisfactory to me.<br />
<strong>Meme</strong>tics provides a third possibility. With a second replicator acting on<br />
human minds and brains the possibilities are expanded. We should expect to<br />
find behaviour that is in the interests of the memes, as well as behaviour serving<br />
the genes. Magic is no longer required to see why humans should differ from all<br />
other animals, nor why they should show far more cooperative and altruistic<br />
behaviour.<br />
We can ask our meme-selection question again. Imagine a world full of<br />
brains, and far more memes than can possibly find homes. Which memes are<br />
more likely to find a safe home and get passed on again? I suggest that among<br />
the successful memes are altruistic, cooperative, and generous ways of behaving.<br />
Altruism in the service of the memes<br />
Imagine two people. Kevin is an altruist. He is kind, generous, and thoughtful.<br />
He gives good parties and buys people drinks in the bar. He often has friends<br />
round for meals and he sends out lots of birthday cards. If his friends are in need<br />
he takes the trouble to ring, to help them out, or to visit them in hospital. Gavin<br />
is mean and selfish. He resents buying other people drinks, and thinks birthday<br />
cards are a waste of money. He never invites people round for a meal, and if his