08.09.2015 Views

The Meme Machine

TheMemeMachine1999

TheMemeMachine1999

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 12<br />

A memetic theory of<br />

altruism<br />

Altruism in the service of the genes<br />

Once one of the greatest mysteries for sociobiology – and now probably one of<br />

its greatest successes – is the problem of altruism.<br />

Altruism is defined as behaviour that benefits another creature at the expense<br />

of the one carrying it out. In other words, altruism means doing something that<br />

costs time, effort, or resources, for the sake of someone else. This might mean<br />

providing food for another animal, giving a warning signal to protect others<br />

while putting yourself at risk, or fighting an enemy to save another animal from<br />

harm. Examples abound in nature, from the social insects whose lives revolve<br />

around the good of their communion to rabbits that thump warnings of<br />

approaching footsteps, and vampire bats that share meals of blood. Humans are<br />

uniquely cooperative and spend a great deal of their time doing things that<br />

benefit others as well as themselves: what psychologists sometimes refer to as<br />

‘prosocial behaviour’. <strong>The</strong>y have moral sensibilities and a strong sense of right<br />

and wrong. <strong>The</strong>y are altruists.<br />

Altruism is a problem for many social psychologists and economists who<br />

assume that humans rationally pursue their own interests. It is also a problem<br />

for Darwinism, although it was not always seen that way. <strong>The</strong> problem varies<br />

according to the level at which you think selection takes place – or, putting it<br />

another way – what you think evolution is for. If you believe, as many early<br />

Darwinians did, that evolution ultimately proceeds for the good of the<br />

individual, then why should any individual behave in such a way as to incur<br />

serious costs to itself while benefiting someone else? All individuals ought to be<br />

out for themselves alone, and nature ought truly to be ‘red in tooth and claw’.<br />

Yet clearly it is not. Many animals live social and cooperative lives, parents<br />

lavish devotion on their offspring, and many mammals spend hours of every day<br />

grooming their friends and neighbours. Why do they do it?<br />

An answer that does not work is what the British philosopher Helena Cronin

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!