The Meme Machine
TheMemeMachine1999
TheMemeMachine1999
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
SEX IN THE MODERN WORLD 141<br />
A second assumption is that women are more likely to imitate the women<br />
they see in the media who have (or appear to have) few children, than those of<br />
their friends who have many. Research in social psychology, marketing, and<br />
advertising shows that people are more often persuaded by others who are<br />
perceived as powerful or famous. Family size is probably no exception, so if<br />
successful women have few children then others will copy their example. If<br />
both these assumptions are true then it followers that, in a climate of horizontal<br />
transmission, birth control will spread and families refill get smaller.<br />
Predictions can also be made. For example, the size of families should<br />
depend on the ease with which memes can spread horizontally in a given<br />
society. Other theories might predict that the main forces for lowering birth rate<br />
(Chinese-type coercion aside) would be economic necessity, availability of<br />
birth-control technology, the value of children as agricultural workers, or the<br />
decline of religions. <strong>Meme</strong> theory suggests that factors such as how many<br />
people a mother typically communicates with, or how much access she has to<br />
printed and broadcast material, should be more important. And note that it is<br />
mothers who count. <strong>Meme</strong>tic theory easily explains why the education of<br />
women is so important in changing family size.<br />
Education aside, this all leads to the paradoxical thought that the more sex<br />
magazines, e-mail sex sites, and sex shops are available, the lower birth rates are<br />
likely to be. <strong>The</strong> sale of sex in modern societies is not about spreading genes.<br />
Sex has been taken over by the memes.<br />
Let us consider an example. Imagine a couple who both have rewarding and<br />
demanding careers. Let us suppose that she is editor of a magazine and he is a<br />
management consultant. <strong>The</strong>y have a large house but it is a work-place as well<br />
as a home. <strong>The</strong>y have computers, fax machines, phones, and desks piled with<br />
work, and they work long hours. She goes to the magazine’s office, but often<br />
works at home, editing contributions, dealing with problems and writing her<br />
own articles. When they are not working they go out with friends to get a<br />
welcome break from it all.<br />
<strong>The</strong> time comes to decide about children. <strong>The</strong> woman is in her thirties; she<br />
has always faintly wanted children, but how will she manage? She sees her<br />
friends juggling family and careers, she sees the time that babies take up, and the<br />
sleep they deprive you of, the problems with nannies, the money they cost. She<br />
thinks about her work: they are about to take over another magazine. Will she<br />
get the job of editing both? If she takes time off, will she lose it? He thinks<br />
about his clients. Will children be in the way? Will he need a separate office?<br />
Will his competitors overtake him if he cannot keep working evenings and<br />
weekends? What if he has to take children to school or do his share of nappy-