The Meme Machine
TheMemeMachine1999
TheMemeMachine1999
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
124 THE MEME MACHINE<br />
kind of behaviour that served, in the past, to get our genes into the next<br />
generation, and will go on doing so in the future.<br />
We should not underestimate how successful sociobiology has been in<br />
addressing this central topic, nor how hard a fight it initially had for acceptance.<br />
For many decades the popular view was that human beings were somehow<br />
above nature and not subject to the constraints of genes and biology. In sexual<br />
behaviour, it was thought, we alone could transcend ‘mere’ biology and make<br />
rational conscious choices about whom we made love to and how. Even though<br />
nothing is closer to the propagation of genes than sexual behaviour, the theories<br />
of the 1950s and 1960s completely ignored biological facts. <strong>The</strong>y made culture<br />
the overriding force but, unlike memetics, had no Darwinian account of how<br />
culture could exert such a force. With the advent of sociobiology in the 1970s<br />
we could begin to make sense of some of our peculiar sexual proclivities (see<br />
e.g. Matt Ridley 1993; Symons 1979).<br />
Love, beauty, and parental investment<br />
Consider mate choice. We may like to think that we chose our lover for reasons<br />
that have nothing to do with genes and biology; maybe we just fell in love,<br />
maybe we chose rationally because he fitted our notion of a perfect husband, or<br />
maybe we chose for aesthetic reasons because – well, because he’s gorgeous.<br />
<strong>The</strong> truth appears to be that romance and falling in love are themselves based on<br />
our deep-seated tendencies to pick sexual partners in ways that would, in our far<br />
past, have enhanced the chances of passing our genes into the next generation.<br />
For a start, just how attractive is your partner? I could make a guess that he<br />
or she will be just about as attractive as you are. Why? <strong>The</strong> logic of what is<br />
called ‘assortative mating’ is very simple, whether you are male or female you<br />
need to get the best mate you possibly can, Inasmuch as beauty is relevant to<br />
what is ‘best’ you will go for the most beautiful partner you can get. But then so<br />
will everyone else. <strong>The</strong> result should be, on the average, that people pair up<br />
with partners that more or less match them in attractiveness, and this is just what<br />
has been found in experiments.<br />
But what is beauty? What makes a man or a woman attractive? <strong>The</strong> simple<br />
answer seems to be that men tend women attractive when they have all the signs<br />
of being young and fertile, while women are more interested in the status of a<br />
potential lover than in his physical appearance. This turns out to have a good<br />
biological basis – if a rather complex one.<br />
<strong>The</strong> basic difference between being male and being female is that females