08.09.2015 Views

The Meme Machine

TheMemeMachine1999

TheMemeMachine1999

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

124 THE MEME MACHINE<br />

kind of behaviour that served, in the past, to get our genes into the next<br />

generation, and will go on doing so in the future.<br />

We should not underestimate how successful sociobiology has been in<br />

addressing this central topic, nor how hard a fight it initially had for acceptance.<br />

For many decades the popular view was that human beings were somehow<br />

above nature and not subject to the constraints of genes and biology. In sexual<br />

behaviour, it was thought, we alone could transcend ‘mere’ biology and make<br />

rational conscious choices about whom we made love to and how. Even though<br />

nothing is closer to the propagation of genes than sexual behaviour, the theories<br />

of the 1950s and 1960s completely ignored biological facts. <strong>The</strong>y made culture<br />

the overriding force but, unlike memetics, had no Darwinian account of how<br />

culture could exert such a force. With the advent of sociobiology in the 1970s<br />

we could begin to make sense of some of our peculiar sexual proclivities (see<br />

e.g. Matt Ridley 1993; Symons 1979).<br />

Love, beauty, and parental investment<br />

Consider mate choice. We may like to think that we chose our lover for reasons<br />

that have nothing to do with genes and biology; maybe we just fell in love,<br />

maybe we chose rationally because he fitted our notion of a perfect husband, or<br />

maybe we chose for aesthetic reasons because – well, because he’s gorgeous.<br />

<strong>The</strong> truth appears to be that romance and falling in love are themselves based on<br />

our deep-seated tendencies to pick sexual partners in ways that would, in our far<br />

past, have enhanced the chances of passing our genes into the next generation.<br />

For a start, just how attractive is your partner? I could make a guess that he<br />

or she will be just about as attractive as you are. Why? <strong>The</strong> logic of what is<br />

called ‘assortative mating’ is very simple, whether you are male or female you<br />

need to get the best mate you possibly can, Inasmuch as beauty is relevant to<br />

what is ‘best’ you will go for the most beautiful partner you can get. But then so<br />

will everyone else. <strong>The</strong> result should be, on the average, that people pair up<br />

with partners that more or less match them in attractiveness, and this is just what<br />

has been found in experiments.<br />

But what is beauty? What makes a man or a woman attractive? <strong>The</strong> simple<br />

answer seems to be that men tend women attractive when they have all the signs<br />

of being young and fertile, while women are more interested in the status of a<br />

potential lover than in his physical appearance. This turns out to have a good<br />

biological basis – if a rather complex one.<br />

<strong>The</strong> basic difference between being male and being female is that females

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!