08.09.2015 Views

The Meme Machine

TheMemeMachine1999

TheMemeMachine1999

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE LIMITS OF SOCIOBIOLOGY 117<br />

begin to starve. <strong>The</strong>refore, genes for good jumping or strong back legs spread in<br />

the gene pool and soon all the creatures are more like frogs. Jumping improves<br />

and the selection pressure now favours even higher leaps. Behaviour has, in a<br />

perfectly Darwinian fashion, affected selection.<br />

Now imagine that the flies vary in appearance and goodness to eat. Let us<br />

suppose that striped flies are inedible while spotty flies are excellent food.<br />

Froglings that prefer spotty flies will be at an advantage and so the mechanisms<br />

required for preferring spotty flies, such as sensitive spot detectors in the visual<br />

system, will spread. However, it might be the case that the pattern on the flies<br />

changes faster than frogling evolution can track. In this case it will pay the little<br />

frogling: to be able to learn which flies to eat. Any frogling that cannot learn<br />

will be at a disadvantage and so genes for a general ability to learn will spread.<br />

This is the Baldwin effect.<br />

As Baldwin himself puts it – the highest phenomena of intelligence,<br />

including consciousness, the lessons of pleasure and pain, maternal instruction<br />

and imitation, culminate in the skilful performances of human volition and<br />

invention. ‘All these instances are associated in the higher organisms, and all of<br />

them unite to keep the creature alive . . . By this means those congenital or<br />

phylogenetic variations are kept in existence, which lend themselves to<br />

intelligent, imitative, adaptive, and mechanical modification during the lifetime<br />

of the creatures which have them. Other congenital variations are not thus kept<br />

in existence.’ (Baldwin 1896, p, 445, italics in the original.) In more modern<br />

terms, genes for learning and imitation will be favoured by natural selection.<br />

Baldwin thus saw that natural selection, without need of the inheritance of<br />

acquired characteristics, could account for the evolution of the capacity to learn.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Baldwin effect creates new kinds of creatures that are capable of adapting to<br />

change far more quickly than their predecessors. But this is not the only step in<br />

this direction. Dennett explains, using his metaphor of the ‘Tower of Generate<br />

and Test’, an imaginary tower in which each floor has creatures that are able to<br />

find better and smarter moves, and find them more quickly and efficiently<br />

(Dennett 1995).<br />

On the ground floor of Dennett’s tower live the ‘Darwinian creatures’. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

creatures evolve by natural selection and all their behaviour is built in by the<br />

genes. Mistakes are very costly (unsuccessful creatures have to die) and slow<br />

(new creatures have to be built each time).<br />

On the next floor live the ‘Skinnerian creatures’, named after B. F. Skinner<br />

(1953) who explicitly saw operant conditioning (learning by trial and error) as a<br />

kind of Darwinian selection. Skinnerian creatures can learn. So their behaviour

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!