08.09.2015 Views

The Meme Machine

TheMemeMachine1999

TheMemeMachine1999

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE LIMITS OF SOCIOBIOLOGY 115<br />

Freeman (1996) spent six years in Samoa and, unlike Mead who was there<br />

only four months, he lived with Samoans and had time to learn their language.<br />

‘What he found could hardly have been more at variance with Mead’s<br />

descriptions of Samoan life. He found aggressive behaviour and frequent<br />

warfare, severe forms of punishment for misdemeanours, high rates of<br />

delinquency among adolescents and, most important for Mead’s thesis, that the<br />

Samoans placed great value on virginity. <strong>The</strong>y even had a virginity test and<br />

ceremonial defloration of girls at their wedding.<br />

How could Mead have got it so wrong? Freeman was able to track down<br />

some of her original informants and found out. One woman, by then aged 86,<br />

explained that Mead didn’t realise they were ‘just joking’ when they said they<br />

went out at nights with boys. Another confirmed that they had dreamed up the<br />

stories for fun – and just imagine the fun of inventing wild and crazy stories<br />

about your sex life for an ignorant young visitor who is anxiously writing it all<br />

down. As is so often the case, it took a lot more time and hard work to unmake<br />

the myth than to make it in the first place. It also took a lot of courage.<br />

Freeman’s discoveries were scorned by people who had almost made Mead into<br />

a guru, and he was vilified for daring to suggest she was completely wrong.<br />

Looking back with the benefit of modern evolutionary psychology we can<br />

see how and why the original theories were completely wrong. Cosmides and<br />

Tooby are right to reject them. However, their version of evolutionary<br />

psychology seems to me to go too far in the opposite direction. <strong>The</strong>y leave no<br />

room for any true evolution of culture. As far as they are concerned ‘Human<br />

minds, human behaviour, human artefacts, and human culture are all biological<br />

phenomena’ (Tooby and Cosmides 1992, p. 21). In other words, the world of<br />

ideas, technology and toys, philosophy and science are all to be explained as the<br />

products of biology – of evolution by the natural selection of genes.<br />

I do not wish to underestimate the importance of sociobiology and<br />

evolutionary psychology. In the next chapter I will consider some of their<br />

greatest successes in explaining human sexuality. But they are looking at only<br />

part of the picture. Certainly much of our behaviour has been selected because it<br />

effectively propagates the genes on which it depends. But behaviour is also<br />

driven by memetic selection and has been selected because it effectively<br />

propagates the memes on which it depends.<br />

I like to look at it this way. <strong>The</strong>re are two replicators driving the evolution<br />

and design of our bodies, brains and behaviour. For some aspects of our lives<br />

the genes do most of the driving, and the role of the memes can be safely<br />

ignored. In these cases the gene-based approach of sociobiology and<br />

evolutionary psychology is a good approximation (though still only an

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!