08.09.2015 Views

The Meme Machine

TheMemeMachine1999

TheMemeMachine1999

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MEME–GENE COEVOLUTION 103<br />

What about longevity? No individual behaviour has much longevity in itself,<br />

but longevity inside the brain is important. Some actions are hard to remember<br />

and therefore hard to copy, especially after a delay. We would expect the<br />

successful memes to depend on behaviours that are easily remembered so that<br />

they can be reproduced even after long delays. Language has very efficiently<br />

improved memorability, remembering dance steps can be troublesome, but<br />

remembering ‘slow, slow, quick-quick slow’ is easy. We find it impossible to<br />

reproduce a long series of meaningless noises, but easy to repeat back a sentence<br />

of a few dozen words. Without too much trouble we can repeat whole stories<br />

and conversations. Indeed, many cultures have depended entirely on rote<br />

learning of long stories and myths to pass on their history. By structuring the<br />

meanings of sounds, language makes them far more memorable.<br />

We can look to technology for another kind of longevity – as when the<br />

invention of pots creates long-lasting models for new pots and more potmaking<br />

behaviour, or when the building of bridges spreads the idea of a bridge to<br />

everyone who crosses one. <strong>The</strong> longevity of language took a dramatic turn with<br />

the invention of writing – committing words to clay, papyrus or floppy disk –<br />

but I shall consider these further steps in longevity later.<br />

I have described the appearance of words as a process of digitising. <strong>The</strong> real<br />

problem for understanding language origins is not so much the words, which at<br />

least in principle can be learned by simple associative learning, but the grammar.<br />

However, grammar also improves replication. How many things can you say<br />

with a given set of words? Not very many, unless you have some way of<br />

specifying different meanings if you combine the words in different ways.<br />

Adding prefixes and suffixes, inflecting them in different ways, and specifying<br />

word order would all increase the number of possible separate utterances that<br />

could be produced and copied. In this sense, grammar might be seen as a new<br />

way of increasing fecundity as well as fidelity. <strong>The</strong> more precisely the copies<br />

are made, the more effective they will be. <strong>The</strong>n, as more and more possible<br />

things can be said, more memes can be created to continue driving the process.<br />

Remember that all that is going on here is selection, with no need for<br />

conscious foresight or deliberate design on the part of either the memes<br />

themselves or the people who are copying them. We need only imagine groups<br />

of people who all tend to copy each other, and they copy some sounds more than<br />

others. Whether a particular sound is copied because it is easy to remember,<br />

easy to produce, conveys a pleasant emotion, or provides useful information,<br />

does not matter as much as the general principle, that when lots of sounds are in

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!