The Meme Machine
TheMemeMachine1999
TheMemeMachine1999
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
88 THE MEME MACHINE<br />
facial expressions that take on the grammatical functions of word endings, word<br />
orders or inflexion.<br />
This ‘language instinct’ as Steven Pinker (1994) calls it, singles us out<br />
completely from every other species on the planet. As far as we know, no other<br />
species has any kind of grammatically structured language – nor are they<br />
capable of learning it. When psychologists first tried to teach language to<br />
chimpanzees they failed because chimps simply do not have the vocal apparatus<br />
to make the necessary sounds. However, they got on better when they trained<br />
their chimps with methods that exploit their natural manual dexterity. One<br />
chimpanzee, Sarah, has been trained to use a board containing various plastic<br />
shapes that represent familiar objects and actions, while Lana and Kanzi press<br />
buttons on a special keyboard. Most popular, however, has been the use of<br />
signing, building on the fact that chimps have agile hands and make many<br />
gestures in the wild. Among the many animals taught this way have been a<br />
chimpanzee called Washoe and a gorilla called Koko, both of whom were<br />
brought up with humans using American Sign Language.<br />
At first it seemed as though Washoe, Koko and others really could sign.<br />
<strong>The</strong>y were credited with ‘sentences’ three words long, like a child of two years<br />
or so. <strong>The</strong>y even made up new words by putting signs together. But the<br />
excitement and wild claims soon gave way under careful criticism from<br />
psychologists, linguists, and native deaf signers who said that chimp signing was<br />
nothing like the rich and expressive human sign language. Wishful thinking<br />
probably accounts for much of the exaggeration. <strong>The</strong> consensus now seems to<br />
be that chimps and gorillas can learn single signs or symbols, and use short<br />
sequences of them appropriately – mostly to request things. Yet they do not use<br />
grammar of any kind and remain oblivious to all the subtleties of sentences that<br />
young children seem to take to without effort. Whereas young children just<br />
seem to absorb the words they hear and turn them into language, chimps have to<br />
be coerced, and rewarded to learn just a few paltry signs. Whatever they may be<br />
thinking on the inside (and we should not underestimate that), they just do not<br />
‘get’ the idea of true language. <strong>The</strong>re is no comparison. It is as though the<br />
chimps have to learn the words by the long slow route of ordinary learning –<br />
trial and error, and reward and punishment – whereas we just seem to absorb it.<br />
<strong>The</strong> human language capacity is unique.<br />
So how did we get this unique ability’? Did it appear all at once in some<br />
gigantic lucky leap of sudden evolution (Bickerton 1990)? Or did it appear<br />
gradually along with our slowly growing brains? And when did language first