08.09.2015 Views

The Meme Machine

TheMemeMachine1999

TheMemeMachine1999

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

88 THE MEME MACHINE<br />

facial expressions that take on the grammatical functions of word endings, word<br />

orders or inflexion.<br />

This ‘language instinct’ as Steven Pinker (1994) calls it, singles us out<br />

completely from every other species on the planet. As far as we know, no other<br />

species has any kind of grammatically structured language – nor are they<br />

capable of learning it. When psychologists first tried to teach language to<br />

chimpanzees they failed because chimps simply do not have the vocal apparatus<br />

to make the necessary sounds. However, they got on better when they trained<br />

their chimps with methods that exploit their natural manual dexterity. One<br />

chimpanzee, Sarah, has been trained to use a board containing various plastic<br />

shapes that represent familiar objects and actions, while Lana and Kanzi press<br />

buttons on a special keyboard. Most popular, however, has been the use of<br />

signing, building on the fact that chimps have agile hands and make many<br />

gestures in the wild. Among the many animals taught this way have been a<br />

chimpanzee called Washoe and a gorilla called Koko, both of whom were<br />

brought up with humans using American Sign Language.<br />

At first it seemed as though Washoe, Koko and others really could sign.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y were credited with ‘sentences’ three words long, like a child of two years<br />

or so. <strong>The</strong>y even made up new words by putting signs together. But the<br />

excitement and wild claims soon gave way under careful criticism from<br />

psychologists, linguists, and native deaf signers who said that chimp signing was<br />

nothing like the rich and expressive human sign language. Wishful thinking<br />

probably accounts for much of the exaggeration. <strong>The</strong> consensus now seems to<br />

be that chimps and gorillas can learn single signs or symbols, and use short<br />

sequences of them appropriately – mostly to request things. Yet they do not use<br />

grammar of any kind and remain oblivious to all the subtleties of sentences that<br />

young children seem to take to without effort. Whereas young children just<br />

seem to absorb the words they hear and turn them into language, chimps have to<br />

be coerced, and rewarded to learn just a few paltry signs. Whatever they may be<br />

thinking on the inside (and we should not underestimate that), they just do not<br />

‘get’ the idea of true language. <strong>The</strong>re is no comparison. It is as though the<br />

chimps have to learn the words by the long slow route of ordinary learning –<br />

trial and error, and reward and punishment – whereas we just seem to absorb it.<br />

<strong>The</strong> human language capacity is unique.<br />

So how did we get this unique ability’? Did it appear all at once in some<br />

gigantic lucky leap of sudden evolution (Bickerton 1990)? Or did it appear<br />

gradually along with our slowly growing brains? And when did language first

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!