Memorandum - NHTSA
Memorandum - NHTSA
Memorandum - NHTSA
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Iv-39<br />
Vehicle Tests vs. Fixture Tests - Some requirements are lifthehicle interface related and so<br />
certification tests must be conducted on the test vehicle itself (e.g., roll stop pinch test, Static<br />
Load I, fatigue endurance, Static Test Load 11, platform deflection, etc.), whereas some<br />
requirements are lift-only related (independent of the test vehicle) [e.g., slip resistance,<br />
environmental resistance, inner and outer bamer dynamic tests, hand rail strength test, outer<br />
barrier over load test, platform marking contrast, 1,088 kg mass (2,400 lbs.) Static Test 111, etc ]<br />
can be conducted on a static fixture or jig. The latter approach using jigdfixtures is an option 1 If<br />
the lift manufacturers can use to certify.<br />
Note: The Access Board did not specify tests, but rather performance and design guidelines.<br />
To facilitate FMVSS objectivity <strong>NHTSA</strong> added a platform deflection test, a static load test, an<br />
inner roll stop test, a dynamic outer barrier retention test and a slip resistance test among man3<br />
others.<br />
OTHER APPLICABILITY CONSIDERATIONS<br />
WC Lifts vs. Ramps - A large proportion of vans used for paratransit purposes are ramp equip led<br />
(driver operated) and many personal minivans are equipped with power operated ramps. In 1996,<br />
over 75 percent of the transit buses subsidized with federal funds by FTA were low floor/ramr<br />
equipped. Although a ramp may be considerably less expensive compared to a lift, the<br />
incremental cost of a lower floor bus would probably offset any savings. According to 1997<br />
APTA data, 7.2 percent of new buses purchased in 1995 included ramps as a means of WC<br />
accessibility. WC ramps are not subject to the requirements of FMVSS No.403/404.