techniques for approximating the international temperature ... - BIPM
techniques for approximating the international temperature ... - BIPM techniques for approximating the international temperature ... - BIPM
78 Table 6.1: Temperature values (K) at the cold extremity of the connecting tube of a vapour pressure thermometer using helium or hydrogen for various tube diameters, a hot extremity at room temperature, and thermomolecular effects of 10 mK and 1 mK. Filling Thermomolecular Tube Diameter (mm) gas Effect 0.5 1 5 10 ___________________________________________ 3 He: dT = 10 mK 0.76 0.65 0.48 0.42 K dT= 1 mK 1.08 0.90 0.64 0.56 K 4 He: dT = 10 mK 1.45 1.30 1.05 0.96 K dT= 1 mK 1.83 1.62 1.27 1.16 K H2: dT = 10 mK below 10 K dT = 1 mK below 10 K Table 6.2: Amounts by which small Concentrations of 3 He in liquid 4 He affect Vapour Pressure. Concentration of Temperature (K) Pressure Equivalent 3 He (%) Change (kPa) Temperature Change (K) _________________________________________________________________________ 0.12 1.5 1.6 0.5 0.02 1.5 0.3 0.2 0.12 2.6 5.2 0.2 0.02 2.6 0.6 0.04 _________________________________________________________________________
6.3.6 Corrections Due to Impurities a. Helium ( 3 He, 4 He) 79 The only impurity problem with helium is isotopic since all other substances are solid at these temperatures and the solids are not soluble in liquid helium. The presence of 4 He in liquid 3 He lowers the vapour pressure below that of pure 3 He. The concentration of 4 He in the vapour phase is much less important than in the liquid phase. For concentrations of 4 He in the liquid phase of < 10%, we can use [Sydoriak and Sherman (1964)] the approximate formula (derived from Raoult's Law) Π − P x = ( 1− x) d ( ln P ) In this expression x is the concentration of 3 He (> 90%); Π is the saturated vapour pressure of pure 3 He and Px is the pressure of the mixture at temperature T; the derivative is taken for x = 1 at temperature T. One can obtain correction curves at the calculated temperatures according to this formula [Sydoriak and Sherman (1964)]. For 0.1 % of 4 He in the liquid phase, this gives a temperature correction of 0.02 mK at 0.4 K and of 0.71 mK at 3.2 K. In 4 He, the only awkward impurity would be 3 He. Commercially supplied 4 He contains no 3 He, so the only risk of error would be from its accidental introduction from, e.g., poor manipulation of a dilution refrigerator. Not many measurements have been made, but they are confirmed by theoretical calculation. Even a small concentration of 3 He in 4 He causes a considerable increase in the vapour pressure, as shown in Table 6.2. The numerical values in the table concern the concentration of 3 He in the liquid phase of 4 He. The concentrations of 3 He in the vapour phase are even more important than in the liquid phase. b. Hydrogen [Ancsin (1977)] The only volatile impurity, He, seems not to be soluble in liquid hydrogen and is therefore not in contact with the separation surface. Other impurities are condensed and cause no problem except for Ne which can cause errors up to ∆P = 210 Pa (∆T = 1 mK) at 19 K for a concentration of 410 ppm in volume. Other errors can occur because the ortho-para conversion of hydrogen is not instantaneous and the proportion of these two states is a function of the temperature. At room temperature, normal hydrogen is 75% ortho and 25% para, while at 20 K equilibrium hydrogen is 0.21 % ortho and 99.79% para with a boiling point 0.12 K lower than that of normal hydrogen. To obtain reproducible results, one must introduce a catalyst dx x
- Page 48 and 49: 28 fraction of sample melted) can g
- Page 50 and 51: 30 Fig. 3.2a: Apparatus for the cal
- Page 52 and 53: 32 Fig. 3.3: Sealed cell for realiz
- Page 54 and 55: 34 Final readings of the thermomete
- Page 56 and 57: 36 temperatures differ (usually) sy
- Page 58 and 59: 38 Fig. 3.4: Cross sectional drawin
- Page 60 and 61: 40 Fig. 3.5: Miniature graphite bla
- Page 62 and 63: 42 4. Germanium Resistance Thermome
- Page 64 and 65: 44 Fig. 4.3: Example of the Π-type
- Page 66 and 67: 46 Fig. 4.4: Differences between dc
- Page 68 and 69: 48 - conversely, p-doped thermomete
- Page 70 and 71: 50 Fig. 4.6: Effect of a radio-freq
- Page 72 and 73: 52 that it will not be subject to m
- Page 74 and 75: ln R n = ∑ i= 0 54 ⎛ ln T - P
- Page 76 and 77: 56 Fig. 5.1: Resistance (Ω) and s
- Page 78 and 79: 58 thermometer wires) caused a more
- Page 80 and 81: 60 6. Vapour Pressure Thermometry*
- Page 82 and 83: 62 transitions, but it could be app
- Page 84 and 85: n ∑ i= 2 64 L x [ Π − k ] P =
- Page 86 and 87: 66 Fig. 6.3: Diagram at constant pr
- Page 88 and 89: 68 Fig. 6.4: Schematic construction
- Page 90 and 91: 70 Fig. 6.6: Use of an evacuated ja
- Page 92 and 93: 72 Following this, the connecting t
- Page 94 and 95: 74 Fig. 6.9: (c) N2, CO, Ar, O2, CH
- Page 96 and 97: 76 the Weber-Schmidt equation [Webe
- Page 100 and 101: 80 into the bulb (hydrous ferric ox
- Page 102 and 103: 82 Fig. 6.12: Effect on the vapour
- Page 104 and 105: 84 the remaining liquid increases.
- Page 106 and 107: 86 Curie constant (C⊥ is about 0.
- Page 108 and 109: 8.1 General Remarks 88 8. Platinum
- Page 110 and 111: 90 For a group of 45 thermometers h
- Page 112 and 113: 92 More recently, Seifert [(1980),
- Page 114 and 115: 94 For thermometers with W(4.2 K) <
- Page 116 and 117: 96 after 500 h at 1700 °C in air,
- Page 118 and 119: 98 normally extends about 50 cm bac
- Page 120 and 121: 100 inhomogeneities result from the
- Page 122 and 123: 9.5 Approximations to the ITS-90 10
- Page 124 and 125: 104 10. Infrared Radiation Thermome
- Page 126 and 127: 106 almost negligible. The final ac
- Page 128 and 129: 108 11. Carbon Resistance Thermomet
- Page 130 and 131: 110 Fig. 11.1: Resistance-temperatu
- Page 132 and 133: 112 Table 11.1: Typical Time Consta
- Page 134 and 135: 114 calibration after each cool-dow
- Page 136 and 137: 116 12. Carbon-Glass Resistance The
- Page 138 and 139: 118 Fig. 12.1: Resistance-temperatu
- Page 140 and 141: 120 14. Diode Thermometers Diodes c
- Page 142 and 143: 122 2 BT V = E0 − − CT ln ( DT)
- Page 144 and 145: 124 Fig. 15.1: Principal features o
- Page 146 and 147: 126 For a thermometer graduated abo
6.3.6 Corrections Due to Impurities<br />
a. Helium ( 3 He, 4 He)<br />
79<br />
The only impurity problem with helium is isotopic since all o<strong>the</strong>r substances are solid<br />
at <strong>the</strong>se <strong>temperature</strong>s and <strong>the</strong> solids are not soluble in liquid helium.<br />
The presence of 4 He in liquid 3 He lowers <strong>the</strong> vapour pressure below that of pure 3 He.<br />
The concentration of 4 He in <strong>the</strong> vapour phase is much less important than in <strong>the</strong> liquid<br />
phase. For concentrations of 4 He in <strong>the</strong> liquid phase of < 10%, we can use [Sydoriak and<br />
Sherman (1964)] <strong>the</strong> approximate <strong>for</strong>mula (derived from Raoult's Law)<br />
Π − P<br />
x<br />
=<br />
( 1−<br />
x)<br />
d<br />
( ln P )<br />
In this expression x is <strong>the</strong> concentration of 3 He (> 90%); Π is <strong>the</strong> saturated vapour pressure<br />
of pure 3 He and Px is <strong>the</strong> pressure of <strong>the</strong> mixture at <strong>temperature</strong> T; <strong>the</strong> derivative is taken <strong>for</strong><br />
x = 1 at <strong>temperature</strong> T. One can obtain correction curves at <strong>the</strong> calculated <strong>temperature</strong>s<br />
according to this <strong>for</strong>mula [Sydoriak and Sherman (1964)]. For 0.1 % of 4 He in <strong>the</strong> liquid<br />
phase, this gives a <strong>temperature</strong> correction of 0.02 mK at 0.4 K and of 0.71 mK at 3.2 K.<br />
In 4 He, <strong>the</strong> only awkward impurity would be 3 He. Commercially supplied 4 He contains no<br />
3 He, so <strong>the</strong> only risk of error would be from its accidental introduction from, e.g., poor<br />
manipulation of a dilution refrigerator. Not many measurements have been made, but <strong>the</strong>y<br />
are confirmed by <strong>the</strong>oretical calculation. Even a small concentration of 3 He in 4 He causes a<br />
considerable increase in <strong>the</strong> vapour pressure, as shown in Table 6.2. The numerical values<br />
in <strong>the</strong> table concern <strong>the</strong> concentration of 3 He in <strong>the</strong> liquid phase of 4 He. The concentrations<br />
of 3 He in <strong>the</strong> vapour phase are even more important than in <strong>the</strong> liquid phase.<br />
b. Hydrogen [Ancsin (1977)]<br />
The only volatile impurity, He, seems not to be soluble in liquid hydrogen and is<br />
<strong>the</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e not in contact with <strong>the</strong> separation surface. O<strong>the</strong>r impurities are condensed and<br />
cause no problem except <strong>for</strong> Ne which can cause errors up to ∆P = 210 Pa (∆T = 1 mK) at<br />
19 K <strong>for</strong> a concentration of 410 ppm in volume.<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r errors can occur because <strong>the</strong> ortho-para conversion of hydrogen is not<br />
instantaneous and <strong>the</strong> proportion of <strong>the</strong>se two states is a function of <strong>the</strong> <strong>temperature</strong>. At<br />
room <strong>temperature</strong>, normal hydrogen is 75% ortho and 25% para, while at 20 K equilibrium<br />
hydrogen is 0.21 % ortho and 99.79% para with a boiling point 0.12 K lower than that of<br />
normal hydrogen. To obtain reproducible results, one must introduce a catalyst<br />
dx<br />
x