techniques for approximating the international temperature ... - BIPM
techniques for approximating the international temperature ... - BIPM techniques for approximating the international temperature ... - BIPM
36 temperatures differ (usually) systematically from each other, the extrapolated value being the highest and the centroid the lowest. The largest difference is seldom more than 20 mK. 3.3.2 Melting Points of Gold (1064 °C), Palladium (1555 °C), and Platinum (1768 °C) by the Wire-Bridge Method For noble-metal thermocouple calibrations not requiring the highest accuracy, the wire method or wire-bridge method is sufficient. With this technique the temperature of melting of a small piece of metal (wire, disk, or rod) that is fastened (welded, or mechanically clamped) to the thermocouple tip or between the thermocouple legs is measured. The method is simple, rapid, inexpensive, and adequately accurate. This calibration technique is most commonly used at the gold, palladium, and platinum points. It is also sometimes used at the silver point, but this is not recommended because of the danger of the melting temperature being affected by solution of silver oxide. It is necessary to protect the internal chamber of the furnace from contamination by the fixedpoint material by using a protective recrystallized alumina tube. This alumina furnace tube should be kept extremely clean and used only in the calibration of noble-metal thermocouples. To apply the method, a small piece (typical weight < 0.1 g) of metal or short length (5 to 10 mm) of 0.5 mm diameter wire of high purity (at least 99.99%) is used to form the junction between the two elements of the thermocouple by mechanically fastening, wrapping, or welding. Various ways of completing the junction are described by Bedford (1964) and by Bongiovanni and Perissi (1984). For welding, a microtorch with an oxygenhydrogen gas mixture is convenient. With welding, however, there is risk of contaminating the metal with Pt or Rh. Pre-cleaning of the metal link in cool, dilute nitric acid has been recommended. The thermocouple is then slowly inserted into a furnace maintained several degrees below the melting point of the fixed-point material. When equilibrium is reached, the furnace power is increased by a predetermined amount (a heating rate of 0.3 K/min will yield long and flat melting plateaux) and the thermocouple output recorded as the temperature passes through the melting point. Sometimes, but not usually, the metal bridge breaks on melting, interrupting the thermocouple output. During the melt an increase in emf of 2 to 10 µV is typical (smallest with Au, largest with Pt), with the melting lasting 2 to 8 minutes and with a momentary stabilization (0.5 to 2 min) just before completion of melting. Which emf to assign to the fixed point is somewhat ambiguous; the sudden rise from the melting plateau indicating the completion of melting was considered by Bedford (1964) as the most reproducible index, whereas Crovini et al. (1987) recommend using the median of the plateau. It is advisable to test the reliability
37 with a repeat calibration after clipping about 1 cm of wire from the hot junction to avoid effects of contamination. Reliable freezing points cannot be obtained with this method because some material from the thermoelements dissolves in the molten bridge, changing its freezing temperature by an indeterminate amount and producing a freezing transition with a rapidly changing temperature. The melting temperature of palladium is influenced by dissolved oxygen; in an oxygen-free atmosphere the melting temperature is 1554.8 °C and in air is about 1553.5 °C [Jones and Hall (1979), Coates et al. (1983), Bedford (1972a), Jones (1988)]. With a platinum bridge on a thermocouple with a pure platinum thermoelement, either the bridge frequently breaks or the platinum thermoelement melts near, and before, the bridge itself, depending upon the degree of temperature uniformity. The platinum point is best used with double alloy noble metal thermocouples or with refractory metal thermocouples. The accuracy of the procedure is mainly limited by the contamination of the metal bridge by the thermocouple wire, and by the furnace's tendency to raise the temperature of the thermocouple legs, weakly opposed by the latent heat absorbed by the melting bridge, above the melting point. With Pt10Rh/Pt thermocouples it is possible to obtain a reproducibility (1 standard deviation) of about ± 2 µV between two test runs at the gold point, about ± 4 µV at the palladium point, and about ± 8 µV at the platinum point. A detailed description of the use of the wire-bridge method in an interlaboratory intercomparison is given by Crovini et al. (1987). 3.3.3 Miniature Fixed Points for Thermocouple Calibrations Tischler and Koremblit (1982) have devised a modification of metal-fixed-pointcalibrations for thermocouples using miniature ingots that has some of the advantages of both regular fixed points and the wire-bridge method. It can provide calibrations that in many cases are as accurate as the thermocouples themselves and can also provide the possibility of in-situ calibration. The technique has been applied successfully with In, Sn, Cd, Pb, In, Sb, AI, Ag, Au, Cu. A small crucible (volume - 0.1 cm3, mass - 0.3 g) machined from 6 mm diameter graphite rod to the shape shown in Fig. 3.4 is filled with a pure metal ingot (mass of metal from 0.5 to 2 g). A hole is drilled through the graphite below the ingot chamber and another through the graphite lid. One leg of the thermocouple can be inserted into each hole without touching the metal ingot. This completes the electric circuit, prevents contamination of the metal ingot, and permits repeated use of the crucible with the same thermocouple or the exchange of thermocouples.
- Page 5 and 6: iv W(100 °C) = 1.385 (exact value
- Page 7 and 8: Centre for Quantum Metrology Nation
- Page 9 and 10: 2. Type J viii a) temperature range
- Page 11 and 12: c) temperature range from 1664.5 °
- Page 13 and 14: xii
- Page 15 and 16: xiv Acknowledgments This monograph
- Page 17 and 18: xvi 3.3.2 Melting Points of Gold (1
- Page 19 and 20: xviii 11.3 Thermal Contact 111 11.4
- Page 21 and 22: 1 1. Introduction The Comité Consu
- Page 23 and 24: 3 thermometers except in special ex
- Page 25 and 26: 5 The accuracies with which tempera
- Page 27 and 28: Table 1.1: Summary of Some Properti
- Page 29 and 30: PART 1: TECHNIQUES AND THERMOMETERS
- Page 31 and 32: 11 Fig. 2.1: One form of apparatus
- Page 33 and 34: 13 Fig. 2.3: Flow cryostat, shown w
- Page 35 and 36: 15 Fig. 2.4: Stirred liquid bath fo
- Page 37 and 38: 17 contained within a cylindrical c
- Page 39 and 40: 19 Fig. 2.5: Schematic drawing of a
- Page 41 and 42: 21 device SRM 767 [Schooley et al.
- Page 43 and 44: 23 Table 3.1 : Current Best Estimat
- Page 45: 25 The widely-used, but not very re
- Page 48 and 49: 28 fraction of sample melted) can g
- Page 50 and 51: 30 Fig. 3.2a: Apparatus for the cal
- Page 52 and 53: 32 Fig. 3.3: Sealed cell for realiz
- Page 54 and 55: 34 Final readings of the thermomete
- Page 58 and 59: 38 Fig. 3.4: Cross sectional drawin
- Page 60 and 61: 40 Fig. 3.5: Miniature graphite bla
- Page 62 and 63: 42 4. Germanium Resistance Thermome
- Page 64 and 65: 44 Fig. 4.3: Example of the Π-type
- Page 66 and 67: 46 Fig. 4.4: Differences between dc
- Page 68 and 69: 48 - conversely, p-doped thermomete
- Page 70 and 71: 50 Fig. 4.6: Effect of a radio-freq
- Page 72 and 73: 52 that it will not be subject to m
- Page 74 and 75: ln R n = ∑ i= 0 54 ⎛ ln T - P
- Page 76 and 77: 56 Fig. 5.1: Resistance (Ω) and s
- Page 78 and 79: 58 thermometer wires) caused a more
- Page 80 and 81: 60 6. Vapour Pressure Thermometry*
- Page 82 and 83: 62 transitions, but it could be app
- Page 84 and 85: n ∑ i= 2 64 L x [ Π − k ] P =
- Page 86 and 87: 66 Fig. 6.3: Diagram at constant pr
- Page 88 and 89: 68 Fig. 6.4: Schematic construction
- Page 90 and 91: 70 Fig. 6.6: Use of an evacuated ja
- Page 92 and 93: 72 Following this, the connecting t
- Page 94 and 95: 74 Fig. 6.9: (c) N2, CO, Ar, O2, CH
- Page 96 and 97: 76 the Weber-Schmidt equation [Webe
- Page 98 and 99: 78 Table 6.1: Temperature values (K
- Page 100 and 101: 80 into the bulb (hydrous ferric ox
- Page 102 and 103: 82 Fig. 6.12: Effect on the vapour
- Page 104 and 105: 84 the remaining liquid increases.
36<br />
<strong>temperature</strong>s differ (usually) systematically from each o<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong> extrapolated value being <strong>the</strong><br />
highest and <strong>the</strong> centroid <strong>the</strong> lowest. The largest difference is seldom more than 20 mK.<br />
3.3.2 Melting Points of Gold (1064 °C), Palladium (1555 °C), and Platinum<br />
(1768 °C) by <strong>the</strong> Wire-Bridge Method<br />
For noble-metal <strong>the</strong>rmocouple calibrations not requiring <strong>the</strong> highest accuracy, <strong>the</strong><br />
wire method or wire-bridge method is sufficient. With this technique <strong>the</strong> <strong>temperature</strong> of<br />
melting of a small piece of metal (wire, disk, or rod) that is fastened (welded, or mechanically<br />
clamped) to <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>rmocouple tip or between <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>rmocouple legs is measured. The<br />
method is simple, rapid, inexpensive, and adequately accurate.<br />
This calibration technique is most commonly used at <strong>the</strong> gold, palladium, and<br />
platinum points. It is also sometimes used at <strong>the</strong> silver point, but this is not recommended<br />
because of <strong>the</strong> danger of <strong>the</strong> melting <strong>temperature</strong> being affected by solution of silver oxide. It<br />
is necessary to protect <strong>the</strong> internal chamber of <strong>the</strong> furnace from contamination by <strong>the</strong> fixedpoint<br />
material by using a protective recrystallized alumina tube. This alumina furnace tube<br />
should be kept extremely clean and used only in <strong>the</strong> calibration of noble-metal<br />
<strong>the</strong>rmocouples. To apply <strong>the</strong> method, a small piece (typical weight < 0.1 g) of metal or short<br />
length (5 to 10 mm) of 0.5 mm diameter wire of high purity (at least 99.99%) is used to <strong>for</strong>m<br />
<strong>the</strong> junction between <strong>the</strong> two elements of <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>rmocouple by mechanically fastening,<br />
wrapping, or welding. Various ways of completing <strong>the</strong> junction are described by Bed<strong>for</strong>d<br />
(1964) and by Bongiovanni and Perissi (1984). For welding, a microtorch with an oxygenhydrogen<br />
gas mixture is convenient. With welding, however, <strong>the</strong>re is risk of contaminating<br />
<strong>the</strong> metal with Pt or Rh. Pre-cleaning of <strong>the</strong> metal link in cool, dilute nitric acid has been<br />
recommended. The <strong>the</strong>rmocouple is <strong>the</strong>n slowly inserted into a furnace maintained several<br />
degrees below <strong>the</strong> melting point of <strong>the</strong> fixed-point material. When equilibrium is reached, <strong>the</strong><br />
furnace power is increased by a predetermined amount (a heating rate of 0.3 K/min will yield<br />
long and flat melting plateaux) and <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>rmocouple output recorded as <strong>the</strong> <strong>temperature</strong><br />
passes through <strong>the</strong> melting point. Sometimes, but not usually, <strong>the</strong> metal bridge breaks on<br />
melting, interrupting <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>rmocouple output. During <strong>the</strong> melt an increase in emf of 2 to 10<br />
µV is typical (smallest with Au, largest with Pt), with <strong>the</strong> melting lasting 2 to 8 minutes and<br />
with a momentary stabilization (0.5 to 2 min) just be<strong>for</strong>e completion of melting. Which emf to<br />
assign to <strong>the</strong> fixed point is somewhat ambiguous; <strong>the</strong> sudden rise from <strong>the</strong> melting plateau<br />
indicating <strong>the</strong> completion of melting was considered by Bed<strong>for</strong>d (1964) as <strong>the</strong> most<br />
reproducible index, whereas Crovini et al. (1987) recommend using <strong>the</strong> median of <strong>the</strong><br />
plateau. It is advisable to test <strong>the</strong> reliability