techniques for approximating the international temperature ... - BIPM

techniques for approximating the international temperature ... - BIPM techniques for approximating the international temperature ... - BIPM

06.12.2012 Views

94 For thermometers with W(4.2 K) < 4 x 10 -4 this scheme allows calibration of thermometers to within ± 0.02 K from 14 K to 273 K. Using the same method for a group of 31 thermometers having 4 x 10 -4 < W(4.2 K) < 7 x 10 -4 , but using a different reference function (in place of Eq. (8.6)) and correction polynomial (in place of Eq. (8.8)), Besley and Kemp (1978) obtained an accuracy within ± 0.02 K above 40 K for 31 thermometers, and within ± 0.04 K below 40 K for 29 thermometers. In summary, the thermometer is calibrated only at 4.2 K and 273.15 K. A temperature T is obtained by measuring R(T), calculating Z(T) from Eq. (8.5), calculating T* from Eq. (8.6), and calculating ∆T* from Eqs. (8.7) - (8.9). When 4 x 10 -4 < W(4.2 K) < 7 X 10 -4 , the procedure is similar, but uses different reference and correction polynomials. With this proposal: (i) only a relatively simple 2-point calibration is required, (ii) only SPRTs are likely to have W(4.2 K) < 4 X 10 -4 , (iii) it is not applicable to long-stem thermometers; to measure any temperature below 273 K, a calibration at 4.2 K is necessary, (iv) there is no test for the accuracy of interpolation for any particular thermometer. (d) Several other useful approximations to the ITS have been described (see the original papers for details). Kirby et al. (1975) proposed a single deviation function from 14 K to 273 K determined by calibration against a previously-calibrated SPRT at four points using three boiling liquids (He, H2, N2) and the ice point; the resulting inaccuracy is about ± 10 x 10 -6 in W. Pavese et al. (1978) suggested using the same equations as in the IPTS-68 but a different set of fixed points that included only triple points. Tiggelman and Durieux (1972a) showed that a polynomial in the form 6 ∑ n= 0 n W ( T) = A nT (8.10) can fit 14 calibration points between 2 K and 15 K with a standard deviation of ± 2 mK at 4.2 K decreasing to ± 0.3 mK above 11 K for 10 high quality SPRTs (W(H20 b.p.) > 1.3926). In the range 4 - 15 K a mere five points allow an accuracy of ± 3 mK.

9. 1 General Remarks 95 9. Platinum Thermocouples Thermocouples employing platinum in combination with platinum-rhodium alloys, gold, or palladium have been found to be the most reproducible of all the various types. They are resistant to oxidation in air and, because of their high melting points, can be used up to very high temperatures. The best-known member of this group is Pt10Rh/Pt* (or type S, or 10/0). It was long considered more accurate and has probably been studied more than any other thermocouple; moreover, and presumably for these reasons, it served as a defining instrument in the ITS-27, the IPTS-48 and the IPTS-68. It is not one of the defining instruments of the ITS-90, its role having been taken over by the SPRT. Any Pt10Rh/Pt thermocouple, in order to qualify as a defining instrument for interpolation in the range from 630.74 °C to the gold point (1064.43 °C), had to meet strict requirements for purity and thermocouple emf [CCT (1976)]. The Pt13Rh/Pt (or type R, or 13/0) thermocouple is very similar in its properties to the type S; containing 13% Rh by weight, it has a little higher sensitivity and probably also a little higher reproducibility. In many situations the precision of types Sand R thermocouples, especially above 500 °C, is limited to about ± 0.2 °C. For more precise measurements Mclaren and Murdock (1987) have shown that the gold/platinum thermocouple is clearly superior in stability, homogeneity, and sensitivity (about twice that of type S). It even challenges the SPRT on the basis of simplicity and economic practicality. With care, temperatures can be measured to within ± 10 mK in the range 0 °C to 1000 °C. For higher temperatures the palladium/platinum thermocouple has likewise shown considerable promise as being more accurate than type S or R. Precision within ± 20 mK at 1100 °C and ± 50 mK at 1300 °C has been achieved. Studies of both of these types are in progress. The upper temperature limit of use for types R and S thermocouples in an oxidizing atmosphere is quoted as high as 1600 °C (for 0.5 mm diameter wires). Better platinumrhodium alloy combinations for thermometry under oxidizing conditions above 1100 °C, however, are Pt30Rh/Pt6Rh (or type B, or 30/6) or the non-standardized combinations Pt20Rh/Pt5Rh (20/5) and Pt40Rh/Pt20Rh (40/20). These have proven to be exceptionally stable and may be used continuously in air to 1700 °C. In one test, for example, after 200 h heating at 1700 °C in air, the emf of the 20/5 thermocouples had decreased the equivalent of about 5 K at the palladium point (1555 °C) [Bedford (1964)]; ___________________________ * See footnote on page 6.

94<br />

For <strong>the</strong>rmometers with W(4.2 K) < 4 x 10 -4 this scheme allows calibration of<br />

<strong>the</strong>rmometers to within ± 0.02 K from 14 K to 273 K.<br />

Using <strong>the</strong> same method <strong>for</strong> a group of 31 <strong>the</strong>rmometers having 4 x 10 -4 <<br />

W(4.2 K) < 7 x 10 -4 , but using a different reference function (in place of Eq. (8.6)) and<br />

correction polynomial (in place of Eq. (8.8)), Besley and Kemp (1978) obtained an<br />

accuracy within ± 0.02 K above 40 K <strong>for</strong> 31 <strong>the</strong>rmometers, and within ± 0.04 K below<br />

40 K <strong>for</strong> 29 <strong>the</strong>rmometers.<br />

In summary, <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>rmometer is calibrated only at 4.2 K and 273.15 K. A<br />

<strong>temperature</strong> T is obtained by measuring R(T), calculating Z(T) from Eq. (8.5),<br />

calculating T* from Eq. (8.6), and calculating ∆T* from Eqs. (8.7) - (8.9). When<br />

4 x 10 -4 < W(4.2 K) < 7 X 10 -4 , <strong>the</strong> procedure is similar, but uses different reference<br />

and correction polynomials. With this proposal:<br />

(i) only a relatively simple 2-point calibration is required,<br />

(ii) only SPRTs are likely to have W(4.2 K) < 4 X 10 -4 ,<br />

(iii) it is not applicable to long-stem <strong>the</strong>rmometers; to measure any <strong>temperature</strong><br />

below 273 K, a calibration at 4.2 K is necessary,<br />

(iv) <strong>the</strong>re is no test <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> accuracy of interpolation <strong>for</strong> any particular<br />

<strong>the</strong>rmometer.<br />

(d) Several o<strong>the</strong>r useful approximations to <strong>the</strong> ITS have been described (see <strong>the</strong> original<br />

papers <strong>for</strong> details). Kirby et al. (1975) proposed a single deviation function from 14 K<br />

to 273 K determined by calibration against a previously-calibrated SPRT at four<br />

points using three boiling liquids (He, H2, N2) and <strong>the</strong> ice point; <strong>the</strong> resulting<br />

inaccuracy is about ± 10 x 10 -6 in W. Pavese et al. (1978) suggested using <strong>the</strong> same<br />

equations as in <strong>the</strong> IPTS-68 but a different set of fixed points that included only triple<br />

points. Tiggelman and Durieux (1972a) showed that a polynomial in <strong>the</strong> <strong>for</strong>m<br />

6<br />

∑<br />

n=<br />

0<br />

n<br />

W ( T)<br />

= A nT<br />

(8.10)<br />

can fit 14 calibration points between 2 K and 15 K with a standard deviation of ±<br />

2 mK at 4.2 K decreasing to ± 0.3 mK above 11 K <strong>for</strong> 10 high quality SPRTs (W(H20<br />

b.p.) > 1.3926). In <strong>the</strong> range 4 - 15 K a mere five points allow an accuracy of ± 3 mK.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!