03.09.2015 Views

Investors Must Recall Risk Investing's Four-Letter Word

Investors Must Recall Risk, Investing's Four-Letter Word

Investors Must Recall Risk, Investing's Four-Letter Word

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Wall Street Journal Interactive Edition -- January 23, 1998<br />

<strong>Investors</strong> <strong>Must</strong> <strong>Recall</strong> <strong>Risk</strong>, <strong>Investing's</strong> <strong>Four</strong>-<strong>Letter</strong> <strong>Word</strong><br />

By KAREN HUBE Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL<br />

What four letter word should pop into mind when the stock market takes a harrowing<br />

nose dive? No, not those. R-I-S-K. <strong>Risk</strong> is the potential for realizing low returns or even<br />

losing money, possibly preventing you from meeting important objectives, like sending<br />

your kids to the college of their choice or having the retirement lifestyle you crave. But<br />

many financial advisers and other experts say that these days investors aren't taking the<br />

idea of risk as seriously as they should, and they are overexposing themselves to stocks.<br />

"The market has been so good for years that investors no longer believe there's risk in<br />

investing," says Gary Schatsky, a financial adviser in New York. "And when the market<br />

drops hundreds of points and rebounds immediately, that belief is confirmed." The<br />

danger is that when the market declines and stays down for months -- as some analysts<br />

predict it eventually will -- investors won't be able to meet their short-term financial<br />

goals. Or, they will panic and sell their investments as their shares are declining in value,<br />

which is the worst possible time. So before the market goes down and stays down, be<br />

sure that you understand your tolerance for risk and that your portfolio is designed to<br />

match it. Assessing your risk tolerance, however, can be tricky. You must consider not<br />

only how much risk you can afford to take but also how much risk you can stand to take.<br />

What you can afford depends mainly on your time horizon -- how long before you will<br />

need the money. If your investments are targeted for your child's college tuition in three<br />

years, for instance, your financial ability to take on risk is low because you may not have<br />

time to recover if the value of your portfolio declines. But if you have 10 years before<br />

your child heads to college, you can afford to take more risks because you would have<br />

plenty of time to ride out dips in the market. Determining how much risk you can stand --<br />

your temperamental tolerance for risk -- is more difficult. It isn't quantifiable. "A variety<br />

of behavioral factors come into play," says Richard Bernstein, director of quantitative<br />

research at Merrill Lynch & Co. in New York. "If my broker asks me if I want high-risk<br />

or low-risk securities, I may say high risk because I don't want to look wimpy." Similarly,<br />

some people will gloss over the less impressive details of their investing histories, says<br />

Ronald Roge, a financial adviser in Bohemia, N.Y. He routinely asks to see copies of his<br />

clients' tax returns to get a reliable account of gains or losses. "The aim is always to find<br />

the fine line between greed and fear," he says. To that end, many financial advisers,<br />

brokerage firms and mutual-fund companies have created risk quizzes to help people<br />

determine whether they are conservative, moderate or aggressive investors. Some firms<br />

that offer such quizzes include Merrill Lynch, T. Rowe Price Associates Inc., Baltimore,<br />

Zurich Group Inc.'s Scudder Kemper Investments Inc. of New York, and Vanguard<br />

Group in Malvern, Pa. "The typical investor may not have ever experienced a negative<br />

turn in the stock market. They need to be prepared for that," says Robert Benish, vice<br />

president of education programs for Scudder, whose questionnaire is part of a broader<br />

investing-education program. "We want to help them understand what risk means to<br />

them." Typically, risk questionnaires include seven to 10 questions about a person's<br />

investing experience, financial security and tendency to make risky or conservative<br />

choices. Some of these risk tests, such as one created by Vanguard (www.vanguard.com),<br />

can be found on-line. The benefit of the questionnaires is that they are an objective


esource people can use to get at least a rough idea of their risk tolerance. "It's impossible<br />

for someone to assess their risk tolerance alone," says Mr. Bernstein. "I may say I don't<br />

like risk, yet will take more risk than the average person." Many experts warn, however,<br />

that the questionnaires should be used simply as a first step to assessing risk tolerance.<br />

"They are not precise," says Ron Meier, a certified public accountant who teaches<br />

investing-related courses at the College for Financial Planning in Denver, a unit of<br />

Apollo Group Inc., Phoenix. "They are good for leading discussions but not for coming<br />

up with a final risk score." The second step, many experts agree, is to ask yourself some<br />

difficult questions, such as: How much you can stand to lose over the long term? "Most<br />

people can stand to lose a heck of a lot temporarily," says Mr. Schatsky. The real acid<br />

test, he says, is how much of your portfolio's value you can stand to lose over months or<br />

years. Rather than using percentages, think in dollar terms. "When you convert<br />

percentages to figures, often you see very different psychological effects," says Richard<br />

Wagener, a financial adviser in Columbia, Md. The idea of a 20% decline on, say, a<br />

$150,000 portfolio is more abstract than a $30,000 loss, he says. Financial adviser Glen<br />

Clemans of Portland, Ore., says he cites the 1972-1974 bear market to help his clients<br />

realize how much they can lose. "I tell my clients to imagine they had put $100,000 in the<br />

S&P 500 in November 1972," says Mr. Clemans. He then explains that after the first<br />

year, the investment would have been worth $88,000. "I watch to see how they flinch.<br />

Then I tell them that the next year, their investment would have been worth $67,000, and<br />

ask them 'So now what would you do?' " As it turns out, most people rank as middle-ofthe-road<br />

risk-takers, say Mr. Clemans and other advisers. "Only about 10% to 15% of my<br />

clients are aggressive," says Mr. Roge. For some of the biggest risk-takers, particularly<br />

those who say they like to gamble, Mr. Roge recommends creating an "action account"<br />

that includes no more than 10% of their assets. Money in the account can be used to<br />

speculate in the stock market. "Some investors just love the excitement of getting a stock<br />

pick from a brother-in-law, even though they may lose money," says Mr. Roge. "People<br />

who need that kind of action should have an outlet for it."<br />

Copyright ©1998 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.<br />

Questions<br />

1. "<strong>Risk</strong> is the potential for realizing low returns or even losing money, possibly preventing<br />

you from meeting important objectives, like sending your kids to the college of their<br />

choice or having the retirement lifestyle you crave." Do you agree with this definition of<br />

risk?<br />

2. Mr. Roge, who is quoted in this article, mentions a simple test of risk tolerance. (Use the<br />

1972 to 1974 experience) Do you think this is a reasonable test? Why or why not?<br />

3. What are some of the factors that this article suggests determine your risk tolerance? Do<br />

you agree? Explain.


Judging Your Own Tolerance For<br />

Investment <strong>Risk</strong><br />

by George Paniculam<br />

Think about these two questions:<br />

1. If you had a 100 percent chance of winning $8,000 or an 80 percent chance of<br />

winning $10,000, which would you choose?<br />

2. If you had a 100 percent chance of losing $8,000 or an 80 percent chance of<br />

losing $10,000 and a 20 percent chance of losing nothing, which would you choose?<br />

Think about it. This is a test, and we'll come back to it in a minute. In the meantime,<br />

let's discuss investment risk. That's an important question because one of these days<br />

the stock market is going to quit setting record highs and fall back for a while. By<br />

how far and for how long is anybody's guess.<br />

What is known is that the Dow has not suffered a 10 percent "correction" since 1990.<br />

That's a long time. A 10 percent correction in today's market would be roughly 700<br />

points. Many investors in today's market have never seen a 10 percent correction.<br />

What would you do if the market dropped 700 points -- or more? Panic and sell?<br />

Take a deep breath and buy? Hold tight?<br />

What would you do if we have a repeat of the 1973-74 bear market when stocks lost<br />

45 percent of their value in just under two years? Could you weather that?<br />

These questions are really variations of a single question: What is your tolerance for<br />

investment risk?<br />

First, of course, you need to define risk. All investments have risk. Even certificates<br />

of deposit have risk -- they generally won't lose the money you put in them because<br />

they're government insured, but they can earn less than what taxes and inflation eat<br />

away. Stocks usually stay ahead of taxes and inflation, but there is always the shortterm<br />

risk of loss of principal. So what is investment risk to you: loss of principal,<br />

inability to maintain a standard of living, failure to meet the investment goals you<br />

set?<br />

Now back to our opening question. Studies have shown that most people choose the<br />

100 percent chance in question 1 and the 80 percent chance in question 2. In other<br />

words, they hate loss more than they love gain -- even though the alternative<br />

choices in both questions are actually superior risks.<br />

One financial planning firm likes to ask clients the following: "Would you rather be<br />

out of the stock market when it goes down than in the market when it goes up -- or<br />

vice versa?" The question really goes to the heart of whether one should be in the<br />

stock market at all, since to be in the market when it goes up usually means you<br />

have to be in the market when it goes down. If one can't stomach that, then one<br />

should not be in the stock market.<br />

Of course, determining what you will really do when the market drops is tough. It's<br />

easier to be brave when the market is soaring than when it is dropping. One guide is<br />

to ask yourself what you've done in the past, through either minor or major (if you


go back that far) market downturns, or what you've done when a particular<br />

investment dipped. Did you sell, hold, buy? Financial planners suggest these tips to<br />

help you weather the storms when they come:<br />

• Diversify your portfolio. That way, if the domestic stock market drops, the<br />

other parts of your portfolio might cushion the overall fall and keep you from<br />

panic selling.<br />

• Focus on the overall portfolio, not just one part. At any given time, some part<br />

or parts of your portfolio won't be doing as well as another part. Some parts<br />

may even be losing. That's the nature of a well-balanced portfolio.<br />

• Know your goals. If you're investing for retirement 20 years away, who cares<br />

what the market does today. If you're investing for college two years away,<br />

think about reducing your riskier investments.<br />

• Be informed. Panic selling often stems from ignorance. The more you know<br />

about investing and how markets go up and down, the less nervous you'll be.<br />

• Expect surprises.<br />

This column is produced by the Institute of Certified Financial Planners and is<br />

provided by George Paniculam, MBA,CFP, a local member in good standing. He can<br />

be reached at 410-461-2411.


4. I understand the value of my portfolio will fluctuate over time. However, the maximum loss in<br />

any one-year period that I would be prepared to accept is approximately:<br />

(A) O%<br />

(B) -5%<br />

(C) -10%<br />

(D) -20%<br />

(E) -30%<br />

5. Consider the following two investments, A and B. Investment A provides an average annual<br />

return of 5% with minimal risk of loss of principal. Investment B provides an average annual<br />

return of 10% but carries a potential loss of principal of 20% or more in any year. If I could choose<br />

to invest between investment A and Investment B to meet my goal(s), I would invest my money:<br />

(A) 100% in Investment A and 0% in Investment B.<br />

(B) 80% in Investment A and 20% in Investment B.<br />

(C) 50% in Investment A and 50% in Investment B.<br />

(D) 20% in Investment A and 80% in Investment B.<br />

(E) 0% in Investment A and 100% in Investment B.<br />

6. The data below represent actual historical performance of four selected investment portfolios,<br />

A, B, C and D, over a 60-year period. The chart illustrates average annual total returns.* This<br />

performance must be weighed against the associated risk reflected in the high and low range of<br />

annual returns experienced by the portfolios. These ranges are displayed below the chart. (For<br />

example, Portfolio C achieved a 12.20% average annual total return during the 60-year period,<br />

gaining 54% in the best year and losing 43% in the worst year.) Among these investments, I<br />

would prefer my primary investment to be:<br />

(A) Portfolio A (B) Portfolio B (C) Portfolio C (D) Portfolio D


SCORING<br />

After answering each of the six questions, use the following point system and grid to total your<br />

score.<br />

RESULTS<br />

In general, the higher your score, the more comfortable you would appear to be with taking on<br />

financial risk. Two things should be kept in mind as you read the descriptions of the various risk<br />

profiles on the following page. First, your recent investment experience may have influenced your<br />

responses. Recent success may bias you toward taking on more risk, while recent setbacks may<br />

incline you toward a more conservative approach. Second, in the category indicated by your<br />

score, you may find that the attainment of your goals would be difficult. You should discuss such<br />

matters with your Merrill Lynch Financial Consultant.<br />

RISK CATEGORY 1<br />

(6-15)<br />

CONSERVATIVE: In this risk category, preservation of capital is the single most important<br />

concern, with an average annual total return typically ranging from 5% to 7%. Adjusted for<br />

inflation, investment returns may be very low or, in some years, negative, in exchange for very<br />

high liquidity and essentially no risk of principal loss.<br />

RISK CATEGORY 2<br />

(16-25 points)<br />

CONSERVATIVE to MODERATE: In this risk category, preservation of capital and income are<br />

the most important objectives, with an average annual total return typically ranging from 6% to<br />

8%. A slightly greater willingness to accept risk is seen in a desire to have a modest positive<br />

"real" (after-inflation) rate of return.<br />

RISK CATEGORY 3<br />

(26-34 points)<br />

MODERATE: <strong>Investors</strong> in this risk category accept possible principal loss as a natural function of<br />

investment risk incurred in the pursuit of higher total return, typically ranging from 7% to 9%. The<br />

degree of risk is normally reduced through diversification and asset allocation and periodic<br />

revisions to rebalance any excesses that develop.


RISK CATEGORY 4<br />

(35-44 points)<br />

MODERATE TO AGGRESSIVE: <strong>Investors</strong> in this risk category are yet more willing to take risk,<br />

both in the types of securities held and in the concentration of holdings in favored market sectors.<br />

The average annual total return typically ranges from 8% to 10%, but some holdings may be<br />

aimed at higher goals. More active portfolio adjustment is a typical feature of this type of<br />

investor's behavior.<br />

RISK CATEGORY 5<br />

(45-54 points)<br />

AGGRESSIVE: <strong>Investors</strong> in this risk category typically are willing to sustain more in the way of<br />

losses on individual transactions in expectation that overall portfolio results in the balance of their<br />

holdings will produce average annual total returns of 10% or greater. More concentrated positions<br />

and frequent portfolio changes typify this type of investor. More speculative investment choices<br />

also require careful and continuous oversight. <strong>Investors</strong> in this category may experience a wide<br />

variance in results from one year to the next in the pursuit of longer-term goals.


Investment <strong>Risk</strong><br />

Knowing Your Limits<br />

Personal Finance Advisor by Deloitte & Touche LLP<br />

Updated July 29, 1996<br />

By Tom Myers<br />

Deloitte & Touche LLP Senior Tax Manager<br />

The stock market and individual stocks have been experiencing unprecedented volatility<br />

this year. In fact, four of the five largest one-day declines in the history of the Dow Jones<br />

Industrial Average have occurred this year. This coming on the heels numerous record<br />

highs and an impressive 38% increase in 1995.<br />

Naturally, the market's slide has many investors concerned. Understanding investment<br />

risks can help you cope with this volatility.<br />

Setting the Stage: An evaluation of investment risk must consider the investor's overall<br />

financial goals. Thus, the first step is to identify financial goals -- what, how much, and<br />

when -- and list them in order of importance. Once the reasons for investing are identified<br />

and prioritized, then it is time to think about the amount of investment risk the investor is<br />

comfortable assuming.


Types of <strong>Risk</strong>: Assessing risk involves knowing both the various types of investment<br />

risk and the investor's tolerance to assuming these risks. The following are brief<br />

descriptions of the most common types of risk investors face.<br />

Investment<br />

<strong>Risk</strong><br />

Market <strong>Risk</strong><br />

Company <strong>Risk</strong><br />

Credit <strong>Risk</strong><br />

Interest Rate<br />

<strong>Risk</strong><br />

Inflationary<br />

<strong>Risk</strong><br />

Reinvestment<br />

<strong>Risk</strong><br />

Industry <strong>Risk</strong><br />

Currency <strong>Risk</strong><br />

Definition<br />

The uncertainty due to changes in the general level of market prices for<br />

investments, caused by political, social, and/or economic changes.<br />

The uncertainty that a particular company may fail to meet future earnings<br />

expectations, be unable to pay dividends or interest, or succumb to the<br />

competition.<br />

The risk that a company, agency, or municipality may experience difficulty in<br />

paying its debts.<br />

The risk that interest rates may rise and decrease the value of an investment.<br />

The uncertainty that investments will not keep pace with inflation and<br />

purchasing power will be reduced.<br />

The uncertainty that the investor will not be able to reinvest the earnings<br />

and/or principal at the same rate of return that the initial investment earned.<br />

The uncertainty that a particular industry's performance may impact the<br />

growth of the investment.<br />

The uncertainty that currency fluctuations may affect the value of foreign<br />

investments or profits when converting them into the investor's local currency.<br />

<strong>Risk</strong> Tolerance: Personal feelings about investing impact all investment decisions.<br />

Ultimately, an individual investor's tolerance to risk will determine the boundaries for<br />

appropriate investments. There is no right or wrong personal risk tolerance, but<br />

investments should never cause you to loose sleep.<br />

<strong>Risk</strong> Versus Return: Most investors prefer certainty over uncertainty. As rates of return<br />

become more uncertain, investors expect higher returns. There can be up to components<br />

to a rate of return: the risk-free rate of return (for example, U.S. Treasury bills or T-bills),<br />

the premium over the risk-free rate of return to offset inflation risk, and the premium for<br />

a particular investment over the inflation-adjusted risk-free rate of return. The tradeoff<br />

between risk and return is fundamental to all financial decisions, and consequently, to<br />

implementing an investment strategy.<br />

Importance of Time: The length of time that investments will be held is the single most<br />

important factor in any financial plan. The following diagram illustrates the approximate<br />

returns after inflation for stocks, bonds, and T-bills during this century, and demonstrates<br />

the effect of time on historical investment returns.


Historical performance is never a guarantee of future results. Market history, however,<br />

indicates:<br />

• Volatility, or risk, of stocks decreases significantly over time.<br />

• The return on equity securities exceeds the return on fixed income investments over long<br />

periods.<br />

• Investments that are appropriate for long-term financial goals are inappropriate if the<br />

investment time frame is relatively short.<br />

Diversification and Asset Allocation: The lack of diversification ("having all of your<br />

eggs in one basket") can be a risky proposition. Many investors use mutual funds to<br />

diversify their investments; however, having all investments in one type of mutual fund<br />

(for instance, a stock fund) still exposes investors to the risks of that asset class.<br />

Different categories of investments typically do not all perform well at the same time. For<br />

example, stocks and bonds often react differently to the same economic or political news.<br />

By spreading investments among various types of asset classes ("asset allocation"), a<br />

portfolio is better prepared to handle the inevitable ups and downs of the markets.<br />

Your financial and investment advisor can provide you with more information on an<br />

appropriate investment risk and asset allocation strategy and should be consulted before<br />

any action is taken.<br />

Tom Myers is a senior tax manager at Deloitte & Touche, with 11 years experience<br />

advising entrepreneurs and closely-held businesses on tax and business matters.


Understanding Your <strong>Risk</strong> Tolerance<br />

Can Make You a Better Investor<br />

OK, so you're tired of the single-digit returns on your bank<br />

CD. You've found a mutual fund that gained an average 20<br />

percent a year over the past five years.<br />

Before you write that check, though, be sure to ask yourself<br />

this question: "Do I have the risk tolerance to see this<br />

investment through?"<br />

Why? Because it's a general characteristic of investments:<br />

The ones that earn more tend to fluctuate more in value.<br />

You may have wonderful results one year and actually lose<br />

money in another. If you want the high returns, you have to<br />

put up with a bumpy ride.<br />

Some people aren't cut out for that kind of thing. They bail<br />

out of an investment at the first sign of trouble. That could<br />

mean selling at the worst possible time. Know your limits<br />

and you'll avoid that kind of trap.


This quiz will help you gauge your own risk tolerance.<br />

Column 1 Column 2 Column 3<br />

1. Which best<br />

describes your feelings<br />

about investing?<br />

"Better<br />

safe than<br />

sorry."<br />

"Moderation in<br />

all things."<br />

"Nothing<br />

ventured, nothing<br />

gained."<br />

2. Which is most<br />

important to you as an<br />

investor?<br />

Steady<br />

income.<br />

Steady income<br />

and growth.<br />

Rapid price<br />

appreciation.<br />

3. You won! Which<br />

prize would you<br />

select?<br />

$4,000 in<br />

cash.<br />

A 50 percent<br />

chance to win<br />

$40,000.<br />

A 20 percent<br />

chance to win<br />

$100,000.<br />

4. The stocks in your<br />

401[k] statement have<br />

dropped 20 percent<br />

since last quarter. The<br />

market experts are<br />

optimistic. What would<br />

you do?<br />

Transfer<br />

out of<br />

stocks to<br />

avoid<br />

losing<br />

more.<br />

Stay in stocks<br />

and wait for<br />

them to come<br />

back.<br />

Shift more money<br />

into stocks. If they<br />

made sense<br />

before, they're a<br />

bargain now.<br />

5. The stocks in your<br />

401[k] statement have<br />

suddenly gone up 20<br />

percent. You have no<br />

further information.<br />

What would you do?<br />

Transfer<br />

out of<br />

stocks and<br />

lock in my<br />

gains.<br />

Stay in stocks,<br />

hoping for<br />

more gains.<br />

Transfer more<br />

money into<br />

stocks. They<br />

might go higher.<br />

6. Would you borrow<br />

money to take<br />

advantage of a good<br />

investment<br />

opportunity?<br />

Never. Maybe. Yes.<br />

How to determine your score<br />

Each answer in Column 1 is worth one point.<br />

Each answer in Column 2 is worth two points.<br />

Each answer in Column 3 is worth three points.<br />

Add them up to find your total score.<br />

7-11 points: a conservative investor.<br />

12-16 points: a moderate risk-taker.<br />

17-21 points: an aggressive investor.<br />

Information contained herein has been reprinted with the permission of<br />

Standard & Poor's, a division of McGraw-Hill, Inc. The information<br />

has been obtained by Standard & Poor's from sources believed to be<br />

reliable. However, because of the possibility of human or mechanical<br />

error by our sources, Standard & Poor's, AT&T RESOURCES for New


Business or others, AT&T RESOURCES for New Business does not<br />

guarantee the accuracy, adequacy, or completeness of any information<br />

and is not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the results<br />

obtained from the use of such information. Reproduction in whole or in<br />

part prohibited except by permission.<br />

© 1995 by McGraw-Hill, Inc. All rights reserved.


http://www.edvisory.com/risk_tolerance.htm

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!