THE HISTORY OF V.A.R.M.S The Annual Diary 1990 - 2009
THE HISTORY OF V.A.R.M.S. The Annual Diary. 1990 - 2009
THE HISTORY OF V.A.R.M.S. The Annual Diary. 1990 - 2009
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
63<br />
27 - 28 January 2001 - Camperdown Fly-In - Camperdown<br />
Peoples and their Models:<br />
Glen Salisbury F4U Corsair/Macchi MB-326/Spitfire/Skeeter HLG/Canberra/PC-9<br />
Max McCulloch F-86 Sabre/Airbus/Spitfire/60" Pylon Racer<br />
Mark Withers P-51D/KA-1/Sabre<br />
Mark Doyle Combat Wing/ASW???<br />
Colin Karn Combat Wing<br />
David Downs Mungo flying Wing/U-2(Foam)<br />
David Rowlings Macchi(foam)<br />
Kevin ????? (All Sabre<br />
David ????? from F-18<br />
Kent ???? Canberra) Fox<br />
Colin Collyer Schweizer 1-26<br />
Greg Voak Tragi/Zagi Combat Wing(Dynamic Soaring on Mt. Leura)<br />
Ross Bathie Ventus<br />
Colin Smith Ricochet<br />
Tom Wickers Decathalon 1:1 scale<br />
A demonstration of Dynamic Soaring (DS) was provided by Greg Voak off Mt Leura using a Zagi<br />
Combat Wing, very impressive. DS is the not so subtle and sometimes hair-raising art of slope<br />
soaring from the leeward side of a hill or ridge.<br />
April 2001 - 54th (2000/01) Nationals held at Busselton W.A. - Nil report yet.<br />
10 May 2001 - At the General Meeting Colin Collyer initiated yet another "club" project to be taken<br />
on by those members desiring to each scratch-build their own scale model in a group, - the subject<br />
is to be a Schweizer 1-26.<br />
At this juncture an article is repeated that first appeared in Aspectivity 295 of November 1997,<br />
and is worth a re-run, again because of Colin Collyer and the Schweizer 1-26.<br />
This article, written by Dave Thornburg (of Old Buzzard Soaring Book fame), appeared in R/C<br />
Model Builder in February 1980 and I thought it deserved another run and may be of interest to<br />
some of you. My thanks to Colin Collyer for sending it to me. (Editor - Alan Connelly)<br />
It might look tough, but scratch building a "scale" model is really no great trick, says our<br />
author. Here are four scale designs to help you out of the polyhedral rut.<br />
Whatever happened to scale sailplanes? Back in the late '60's and early 70's, when R/C<br />
soaring was just beginning to blossom here in the U.S., scale and near scale models dominated the<br />
flying fields. Sport fliers and serious competitors alike spent their weekends with the Graupner<br />
"Cirrus", the Astro Flight "ASW-17", Soarcraft's Kestrel 19" and the Fliteglas "Phoebus". Even<br />
Mark Smith's "Windward" and "Windfree" designed especially for competition, had the torpedo<br />
fuselages and long lean wings of the typical full-scale sailplane.<br />
<strong>The</strong>n along came a couple of "new" ideas, both of them borrowed from free flight. <strong>The</strong> first<br />
was lighter wing loadings. <strong>The</strong> Europeans, who dictated early designs, were flying mostly slope<br />
and windy-weather thermal. Our conditions were milder and our terrain flatter, so American<br />
designs began to evolve towards lightness. Balsa, spruce and plywood replaced heavier and more<br />
expensive glass and plastic fuselages. Wide-chord wings replaced narrow ones, often on the same<br />
fuselage. Light airplanes not only stayed up longer than heavy ones, they hit the ground a lot softer<br />
at the end of each flight. Under many conditions, the wooden fuselages even proved stronger than<br />
fiberglass. For Americans, lightness was here to stay.<br />
<strong>The</strong> second new idea was polyhedral. Kit designers such as Lee Renaud (Olympic 99), Ed<br />
Slobod (Pierce Arrow), and Tom Williams (Windrifter) changed the whole face of soaring by<br />
adding free flight dihedral to their wingtips. What is this? Everyone asked. Real sailplanes don't<br />
got these funny-looking wings; why put them on models? But the new designs TURNED when you<br />
hit rudder control ... turned instantly, and held a tight circle at a high bank angle without "sliding<br />
down a wing" the way V-dihedral ships often did. Polyhedral ships could ride smaller, tighter<br />
thermals; they could be turned and banked closer to the ground without fear of snagging a wingtip.