THE HISTORY OF V.A.R.M.S The Annual Diary 1990 - 2009
THE HISTORY OF V.A.R.M.S. The Annual Diary. 1990 - 2009
THE HISTORY OF V.A.R.M.S. The Annual Diary. 1990 - 2009
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
41<br />
LAUNCH HEIGHT<br />
As the general strength of models increases and the average flying skills increase, the<br />
launching heights achieved at contests are becoming more and more of a problem. It has<br />
reached the stage where at most contests the average modeller with a traditional balsawoodplastic<br />
covered model cannot hope to compete on equal terms. <strong>The</strong> strong, high performance<br />
models can exceed the launch heights of the traditional models by so much that they more<br />
than make up for any deficiencies in their thermalling ability; a deficiency that is becoming<br />
more and more difficult to see as the models improve. On top of this, they can roam the skies<br />
to such an extent than any lift will be found. <strong>The</strong> flyer of the traditional model must make<br />
a decision to search in one area before they launch. If they do not find lift, their models do not<br />
have the performance to fly to another part of the sky and they must therefore either accept<br />
their flight time or re-launch.<br />
<strong>The</strong> only solution for the traditional modeller is either to join the high technology group<br />
and compete on equal terms, or try to change the rules to limit the launch heights by adopting<br />
weak links in the winch line or reducing the power of the winches.<br />
This debate will not be concluded in the near future. My view is that we should leave<br />
the high technology route to F3B and F3J, as they are regulated International classes.<br />
However, we need to change the rules of the Australian Open <strong>The</strong>rmal class to allow both high<br />
tech and traditional models the chance to compete equally, and it is my belief that the only way<br />
is to reduce the power of winches by increasing the resistance of the motors to the point where<br />
ping launches are not possible.<br />
.... and on the same topic from the same column in a previous Airborne (146 - August 1996),<br />
we have the following;<br />
<strong>The</strong> following is a letter that I received from Martin Simons in relation to my proposed<br />
new rules for <strong>The</strong>rmal Soaring event. For those who do not know, Martin rarely takes part in<br />
contests because he does not feel motivated by the format of the traditional Task A event.<br />
" Your recent remarks in Airborne about thermal soaring events always seemed to me<br />
that thermal soaring contests should be thermal soaring contests. It is a pity that the existing<br />
rule have directed so much attention to the launch and the launching apparatus.<br />
I was at Jerilderie over the Easter weekend, where it was demonstrated by Nic Wright<br />
and others that, with the right launching technique, a modern F3B multi task model can win<br />
the traditional type of thermal soaring event without actually having to do any soaring.<br />
Providing that the air is not actually sinking, the model can stay in the air for long enough to<br />
achieve the maximum permitted time. Even if the air for a particular hear is bad all round, the<br />
model which is highest after the launch is most likely to win.<br />
(History compiler's note: World F3B Champion Joe Wurts has been quoted as saying "He who<br />
launches highest, Wins", and he should know).<br />
Given the kind of launch altitudes measured by Nic Wright, between 220 and 250<br />
metres, to achieve an eight minute flight requires a sinking rate of about 27 metres per minute,<br />
or about 1.5 feet per second. Calculations published recently in the American magazine, RC<br />
Soaring Digest, show that a lightweight floater model, like the old Olympic 2, can achieve this<br />
sink rate. An Olympic cannot safely be winch launched at 250 km/h, however.<br />
A modern F3B model has about the same minimum rate of sink, but it can be launched<br />
to much greater heights, so it will, if well flown, beat the lightweight every time in the same air.<br />
This has had the effect of concentrating all attention on the launching apparatus and the<br />
launch technique and turned us away from thermal soaring.<br />
A thermal soaring contest should be won by a person who can most skilfully locate and<br />
use thermals for soaring. I can think of a competition in which competitors' attention and<br />
ingenuity could be directed in this way. (Martin goes on to detail an extended, closed circuit, on<br />
foot style of X-country competition that has not been reprinted here).<br />
"Printed by kind permission of Airborne Magazine."