interpretation
Volume 8, Number 2 - National Association for Interpretation Volume 8, Number 2 - National Association for Interpretation
Bibliography of Interpretive Resources Cherem, Gabriel J. Visitor Responsiveness to a Nature Trail Environment. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1973. Clark, W. The Interpretive Programs of the National Parks, Their Development, Present Status, and Reception by the Public. Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, 1949. Crostic, Robert Lee. Measurement and Evaluation of Visitor Center Interpretive Messages and Media. Utah State University, Logan, Utah, 1976. Dowell, D.L. Evaluation of a Wilderness Education Program Based on Cognitive and Affective Changes. University of Montana, 1985. Fazio, James R. A Mandatory Permit System and Interpretation for Back Country User Control in Rocky Mountain National Park: An Evaluative Study. Colorado State University, Fort Collins, 1974. Feldman, Robert L. Effectiveness of Audio-Visual Media for Environmental Interpretation to Recreating Motorists. Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, 1975. Gebler, Charles J. A Study of Nature Trail Interpretation in Yellowstone National Park. School of Natural Resources, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1955. Herbert, Mary Ellen. System for Measuring Visitor Participation in Interpretive Programs in Indiana State Parks. Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana, 1974. Kostka, Madonna, and Lou Miller. The Impact of Selected Nature Center Programs on Sixth Grade Pupils. University of Minnesota, St. Paul, 1975. Kranek, James P. Interpretive Objectives from Audience Expectations at Selected Parks and Museums. School of Natural Resources, Ohio State University, Columbus, 1977. Kraus, J. E. Stimulating Attendance at Interpretive Programs. Department of Recreation Resources, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, 1969. Kress, Stephen Wayne. A Study of the Modification of Children’s Negative Attitudes Toward Animals. Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, 1975. Machlis, Gary. Families in Parks: An Analysis of Family Organization in Leisure Settings. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle, 1975. Martinkovic, Patricia L. The Effects of an Interpreter’s Nonverbal Behavior on Park Visitors During a Natural History Presentation. School of Natural Resources, Ohio State University, Columbus, 1977. Ross, Roy Gene. The Factors Affecting the Quality of Visitor Experience at Timpanogos Cave National Monument. Department of Recreation Education, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, 1974. Silvy, Valeen. An Analysis of the Function of Interpretation as Perceived by Visitors and Interpreters. Department of Recreation and Parks, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, 1977. 146
Visitor Studies, Evaluation & Research St. Clair, Siah Lemmard, Jr. Relative Effectiveness of Two Personal Interpretive Methods at a Community Nature Center. Department of Park and Recreation Resources, Michigan State University, East Lansing, 1972. Terry, Ronald A. Campers’ Interests in Interpretive Services in Ozark National Scenic Riverways. University of Missouri, Columbia, 1975. Vincent, Daniel P. Lewis and Clark Caverns State Park Visitors: Their Interests, Satisfactions, Opinions, and Preferences. Studies in Recreation, Department of HPER, University of Montana, Missoula, 1975. Washburne, Randel F. Visitor Response to Interpretive Facilities at Five Visitor Centers. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle, 1971. Willis, Jill Rae. Visitor Analysis at the Cincinnati Zoo with Implications for Interpretive Planning. School of Natural Resources, Ohio State University, Columbus, 1977. TECHNICAL REPORTS Cordell, Harold K., George A. James, and Russell F. Griffith. Estimating Recreation Use at Visitor Information Centers. North Carolina: USDA Forest Service Paper. Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, 1970. Dick, Ronald E., Erik Myklestad, and J. Alan Wagar. Audience Attention as a Basis for Evaluating Interpretive Presentations. Oregon: USDA Forest Service Research Paper. Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, 1975. Hanna, John W., and Valeen Adams Silvy. Visitor Observation for Interpretive Programming. College Station, TX: Bulletin of the Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Texas A&M University, 1978. Roggenbuck, J.W., O.F. Hall, and S.S. Oliver. The Effectiveness of Interpretation in Reducing Depreciative Behavior in Campgrounds. Blacksburg, VA: Department of Forestry, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Final Report PO:DACW-39-81-M-2264, 1982. Roggenbuck, Joseph W. The Relationship Between Trip Motives of Whitewater River Users and Preferences for Environmental Interpretive Programs. Available from Roggenbuck at the Dept. of Forestry and Forest Products, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, 1977. Shiner, James W., and Elwood L. Shafer, Jr. How Long Do People Look at and Listen to Forest-Oriented exhibits? Pennsylvania: USDA Forest Service Research Paper NE- 325. Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, 1975. Wagar, J. Alan. The Recording Quizboard: A Device for Evaluating Interpretive Services. Oregon: USDA Forest Service Research Paper PNW-139. Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, 1972. Wagar, J. Alan. Evaluating Interpretation and Interpretive Media. Berkeley: Pacific SW Experiment Station, 1972. 147
- Page 105 and 106: Personal Interpretation Lustbader,
- Page 107 and 108: Personal Interpretation Reding, Sar
- Page 109 and 110: Personal Interpretation Veverka, Jo
- Page 111 and 112: P L A N N I N G BOOKS Brochu, Lisa.
- Page 113 and 114: Planning Brochu, Lisa, Tim Merriman
- Page 115 and 116: Planning Traweek, David Edward. Vis
- Page 117 and 118: P R E S C H O O L / Y O U N G C H I
- Page 119 and 120: R E S O U R C E M A N A G E M E N T
- Page 121 and 122: Resource Management Roggenbuck, Jos
- Page 123 and 124: Resource Management Johnson, David
- Page 125 and 126: Resource Management Henning, Daniel
- Page 127 and 128: S U S T A I N A B L E D E S I G N J
- Page 129 and 130: T R A I N I N G , C O A C H I N G &
- Page 131 and 132: Lewis, William J. The Use of Models
- Page 133 and 134: Training, Coaching & Professional D
- Page 135 and 136: Training, Coaching & Professional D
- Page 137 and 138: U R B A N E N V I R O N M E N T JOU
- Page 139 and 140: V I S I T O R S T U D I E S , E V A
- Page 141 and 142: Visitor Studies, Evaluation & Resea
- Page 143 and 144: Visitor Studies, Evaluation & Resea
- Page 145 and 146: Visitor Studies, Evaluation & Resea
- Page 147 and 148: Visitor Studies, Evaluation & Resea
- Page 149 and 150: Visitor Studies, Evaluation & Resea
- Page 151 and 152: Visitor Studies, Evaluation & Resea
- Page 153 and 154: Visitor Studies, Evaluation & Resea
- Page 155: Visitor Studies, Evaluation & Resea
- Page 159 and 160: V O L U N T E E R S & D O C E N T S
- Page 161 and 162: Volunteers & Docents Oxley, Florenc
- Page 163 and 164: W R I T I N G & P U B L I C A T I O
- Page 165 and 166: Writing & Publications Ruddell, Edw
- Page 167 and 168: Z O O S & W I L D L I F E JOURNALS
- Page 169 and 170: Zoos & Wildlife Hooper, Jon K. Anim
- Page 171 and 172: APPENDIX submission guidelines for
- Page 173 and 174: Journal of Interpretation Research
Visitor Studies, Evaluation & Research<br />
St. Clair, Siah Lemmard, Jr. Relative Effectiveness of Two Personal Interpretive<br />
Methods at a Community Nature Center. Department of Park and Recreation<br />
Resources, Michigan State University, East Lansing, 1972.<br />
Terry, Ronald A. Campers’ Interests in Interpretive Services in Ozark National Scenic<br />
Riverways. University of Missouri, Columbia, 1975.<br />
Vincent, Daniel P. Lewis and Clark Caverns State Park Visitors: Their Interests,<br />
Satisfactions, Opinions, and Preferences. Studies in Recreation, Department of<br />
HPER, University of Montana, Missoula, 1975.<br />
Washburne, Randel F. Visitor Response to Interpretive Facilities at Five Visitor<br />
Centers. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle, 1971.<br />
Willis, Jill Rae. Visitor Analysis at the Cincinnati Zoo with Implications for<br />
Interpretive Planning. School of Natural Resources, Ohio State University,<br />
Columbus, 1977.<br />
TECHNICAL REPORTS<br />
Cordell, Harold K., George A. James, and Russell F. Griffith. Estimating Recreation<br />
Use at Visitor Information Centers. North Carolina: USDA Forest Service Paper.<br />
Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, 1970.<br />
Dick, Ronald E., Erik Myklestad, and J. Alan Wagar. Audience Attention as a Basis for<br />
Evaluating Interpretive Presentations. Oregon: USDA Forest Service Research<br />
Paper. Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, 1975.<br />
Hanna, John W., and Valeen Adams Silvy. Visitor Observation for Interpretive<br />
Programming. College Station, TX: Bulletin of the Texas Agricultural<br />
Experiment Station, Texas A&M University, 1978.<br />
Roggenbuck, J.W., O.F. Hall, and S.S. Oliver. The Effectiveness of Interpretation in<br />
Reducing Depreciative Behavior in Campgrounds. Blacksburg, VA: Department of<br />
Forestry, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Final Report<br />
PO:DACW-39-81-M-2264, 1982.<br />
Roggenbuck, Joseph W. The Relationship Between Trip Motives of Whitewater River<br />
Users and Preferences for Environmental Interpretive Programs. Available from<br />
Roggenbuck at the Dept. of Forestry and Forest Products, Virginia Polytechnic<br />
Institute, 1977.<br />
Shiner, James W., and Elwood L. Shafer, Jr. How Long Do People Look at and Listen to<br />
Forest-Oriented exhibits? Pennsylvania: USDA Forest Service Research Paper NE-<br />
325. Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, 1975.<br />
Wagar, J. Alan. The Recording Quizboard: A Device for Evaluating Interpretive Services.<br />
Oregon: USDA Forest Service Research Paper PNW-139. Pacific Northwest<br />
Forest and Range Experiment Station, 1972.<br />
Wagar, J. Alan. Evaluating Interpretation and Interpretive Media. Berkeley: Pacific SW<br />
Experiment Station, 1972.<br />
147