Certification

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Evaluation and Score Sheet for Evidence of Performance Certified Interpretive Manager Personal Presentation -- Assign numerical score between 0-5 for each item. Total available points = 100. _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ Did applicant set the stage for issues to be covered in meeting? Did applicant provide an agenda? Did applicant work in the name of his/her organization? Did applicant avoid distracting body movements? Did applicant use visual aids appropriately? Did applicant stick to issue at hand? Did applicant finish with a strong, definite conclusion? Did applicant talk with enthusiasm? Did applicant maintain eye contact with audience? Did applicant speak in friendly, conversational tone? Did applicant avoid speech mannerisms like fillers (“uh”) and repeated phrases? Did applicant use appropriate language for the audience and explain technical terms? Did applicant adapt volume so all could hear? Did applicant pronounce words correctly and distinctly? Did applicant seem aware of audience reactions and feedback? Did applicant show respect for others? Did applicant make an effort to include all members of the audience? Did applicant respond to audience questions appropriately? Did applicant adequately resolve issues and accomplish objective(s) of meeting? Did applicant start and finish on time? _____ TOTAL SCORE Comments: 30
Evaluation and Score Sheet for Evidence of Performance Certified Interpretive Manager Management Document -- Assign numerical score between 0-10 for each item. Total available points = 100. Plan Title ________________________________________________________ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ Is the document well organized so that information is easy to find? Is the document easy to read and comprehend? Does the document avoid the use of jargon, acronyms, or technical terms without explanation? Is information in the document supported by references? Does the document contain enough background information to give the reader a clear understanding of its context? Does the document clearly state its purpose or the problem to be addressed? Does the document succeed in accomplishing its purpose? Does everything that’s included in the document work towards accomplishing its purpose (no extraneous material included)? Does the document include essential operational information necessary for implementation (for example: staffing, budget, cost estimates, action steps)? Has the document been successfully implemented (based on information supplied by applicant)? _____ TOTAL SCORE Comments: 31
Page 1 and 2: Certification Handbook and Study Gu
Page 3 and 4: 1. NAI’s Certification Program 4
Page 5 and 6: Program Description Certification i
Page 7 and 8: 2 Categories There are two general
Page 9 and 10: • and demonstrate the following s
Page 11 and 12: Costs Initial certification applica
Page 13 and 14: 3 Application The CIG category is a
Page 15 and 16: You have one year to complete all e
Page 17 and 18: 4 Period of Validity Certification
Page 19 and 20: 5 The certification exam consists o
Page 21 and 22: Part 2: Essay Exam The following qu
Page 23 and 24: Gross, Michael P., and Ron P. Zimme
Page 25 and 26: Appendix B: National Park Service E
Page 27 and 28: Evaluation and Score Sheet for Evid
Page 29: Evaluation and Score Sheet for Evid
Page 33 and 34: Evaluation and Score Sheet for Evid

Certification

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?