The World in 2030

The World in 2030 The World in 2030

speakers.co.uk
from speakers.co.uk More from this publisher
01.09.2015 Views

The World in 2030 47 I agree with these views about constant increase in the velocity of development, both technological and social, and it is for this reason that I have coupled such seemingly tautologous terms as ‘accelerating’ and ‘exponential’ in my heading for this section. But ‘exponential’ is an easy concept to understand in theory (a doubling every so often – usually over a set, regularly recurring period) but it is hard to appreciate fully how powerful exponential effects are. When a small number doubles the change is almost unnoticeable; when a large number doubles the effect is overwhelming. We are now moving into a period when the effects of exponential technological development will be very noticeable indeed. Ray Kurzweil also makes the apparently astonishing claim that such exponential development is a natural part of human evolution. In his 2005 book ‘The Singularity Is Near’ he writes: The future is widely misunderstood. Our forebears expected it to be pretty much like their present, which had been pretty much like their past. Exponential trends did exist one thousand years ago, but they were at that very early stage in which they were so flat and so slow that they looked like no trend at all. As a result, observers’ expectation of an unchanged future was fulfilled. Today, we anticipate continuous technological progress and the social repercussions that follow. But the future will be far more surprising than most people realise, because few observers have truly internalised the implications of the fact that the rate of change itself is accelerating.

48 The World in 2030 Most long-range forecasts of what is technically feasible in future time periods dramatically underestimate the power of future developments because they are based on what I call the ‘intuitive linear’ view of history rather than the ‘historical exponential’ view. 97 Kurzweil is a man whose views should be taken seriously. As well as being a noted futurist 98 and best-selling author he is an inventor and engineer, recipient of 12 honorary doctorates, the Lemelson-MIT Prize and the US National Medal of Technology. He was the principal developer of the first omni-font optical character recognition, the first printto-speech reading machine for the blind, the first CCD flatbed scanner and the first text-to-speech synthesiser. His suggestion that exponential technology development is a natural evolutionary trait that has, until recently, been masked from view by slow progress during its early phase, appears to be borne out by an examination of the history of technological progress. The agricultural revolution began about 12,000 years ago but it took another 6,000 years before humans developed the three virtual technologies that have shaped our modern world; alphabetic writing, mathematics and the invention of money. (When I describe these technologies as ‘virtual’ I use the word in its original meaning, not in the computing sense of ‘virtual reality.’ The English word ‘virtual’ derives its etymology from the Latin word ‘virtualis’, which implies something which has an essence or an effect without necessarily having a physical existence.)

<strong>The</strong> <strong>World</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>2030</strong> 47<br />

I agree with these views about constant <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the velocity<br />

of development, both technological and social, and it is for<br />

this reason that I have coupled such seem<strong>in</strong>gly tautologous<br />

terms as ‘accelerat<strong>in</strong>g’ and ‘exponential’ <strong>in</strong> my head<strong>in</strong>g for<br />

this section.<br />

But ‘exponential’ is an easy concept to understand <strong>in</strong><br />

theory (a doubl<strong>in</strong>g every so often – usually over a set, regularly<br />

recurr<strong>in</strong>g period) but it is hard to appreciate fully how powerful<br />

exponential effects are. When a small number doubles the<br />

change is almost unnoticeable; when a large number doubles<br />

the effect is overwhelm<strong>in</strong>g. We are now mov<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to a period<br />

when the effects of exponential technological development<br />

will be very noticeable <strong>in</strong>deed.<br />

Ray Kurzweil also makes the apparently astonish<strong>in</strong>g claim<br />

that such exponential development is a natural part of human<br />

evolution. In his 2005 book ‘<strong>The</strong> S<strong>in</strong>gularity Is Near’ he writes:<br />

<strong>The</strong> future is widely misunderstood. Our forebears<br />

expected it to be pretty much like their present, which<br />

had been pretty much like their past. Exponential<br />

trends did exist one thousand years ago, but they<br />

were at that very early stage <strong>in</strong> which they were so<br />

flat and so slow that they looked like no trend at all.<br />

As a result, observers’ expectation of an unchanged<br />

future was fulfilled. Today, we anticipate cont<strong>in</strong>uous<br />

technological progress and the social repercussions<br />

that follow. But the future will be far more surpris<strong>in</strong>g<br />

than most people realise, because few observers have<br />

truly <strong>in</strong>ternalised the implications of the fact that the<br />

rate of change itself is accelerat<strong>in</strong>g.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!