30.08.2015 Views

2013 Law Summaries (pdf) - League of Minnesota Cities

2013 Law Summaries (pdf) - League of Minnesota Cities

2013 Law Summaries (pdf) - League of Minnesota Cities

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

<strong>Law</strong><br />

<strong>Summaries</strong><br />

Final Legislative Action<br />

MINNESOTA SESSION LAWS <strong>2013</strong>


Contents<br />

Session <strong>2013</strong>.....................................................................................1<br />

LMC <strong>2013</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Summaries</strong>..............................................................3<br />

BONDING......................................................................................4<br />

Omnibus bonding bill...................................................................4<br />

CIVIL AND CRIMINAL LAW.....................................................4<br />

Redefining “service animal” under the <strong>Minnesota</strong><br />

Human Rights Act.....................................................................4<br />

Modifications to the False Claims Act............................................4<br />

Criminal conduct related to emergency calls modified...................4<br />

Contribution actions related to construction lawsuits limited.........5<br />

Crime victim provisions modified.................................................5<br />

Domestic abuse provisions modified..............................................6<br />

Service <strong>of</strong> process in contested case review....................................7<br />

Money used to facilitate prostitution or sex trafficking<br />

forfeiture provided.....................................................................7<br />

Restrictions on indemnification agreements in<br />

construction contracts................................................................7<br />

Expanding the limitations period for civil actions<br />

involving sexual abuse................................................................7<br />

Prohibiting exclusion from jury service.........................................7<br />

Restrictions on enforceability <strong>of</strong> liability waivers...........................8<br />

Underage possession or consumption immunity provided<br />

for a person seeking assistance for another..................................8<br />

Transit operator assault criminal penalties prescribed......................8<br />

Increased penalties for wildfire arson provided...............................8<br />

COMMERCE.................................................................................8<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce technical bill........................................8<br />

Bullion coin dealers regulated........................................................8<br />

Scrap metal processing regulations modifications<br />

and criminal penalties establishment...........................................9<br />

DATA PRACTICES.....................................................................13<br />

Safe At Home Program...............................................................13<br />

Omnibus data practices bill..........................................................13<br />

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT................................................14<br />

Additional security for development authority loans authorized....14<br />

Jobs, economic development, housing, commerce<br />

and energy omnibus budget bill...............................................14<br />

ELECTIONS.................................................................................16<br />

Omnibus elections policy bill......................................................16<br />

EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES.....................................19<br />

Emergency medical responders requirements modified................19<br />

Continuing education requirements for community<br />

paramedics modified................................................................19<br />

EMPLOYMENT...........................................................................19<br />

Workers’ Compensation Reinsurance Association<br />

requirements modified.............................................................19<br />

Prompt payment <strong>of</strong> wages modified.............................................19<br />

Limits on reliance on criminal history for employment<br />

purposes expanded...................................................................20<br />

Workers’ compensation modifications provided...........................20<br />

Gender-neutral marriage authorized............................................22<br />

State labor contracts ratified.........................................................22<br />

Employee sick leave benefit use expanded...................................23<br />

UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE...........................................23<br />

<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Summaries</strong><br />

Unemployment insurance provisions in the omnibus<br />

jobs and economic development bill.........................................23<br />

ENVIRONMENT........................................................................23<br />

Technical and consensus drainage law changes made....................23<br />

Metro water group sunset extended.............................................24<br />

180-day process for adopting organized collection<br />

replaced with 60-day negotiation period .................................24<br />

Environment trust fund projects..................................................24<br />

Omnibus lands bill......................................................................24<br />

Wastewater and stormwater funding program<br />

restrictions reduced .................................................................25<br />

Omnibus environmental budget bill............................................25<br />

Legacy spending bill gets controversial, earns first veto <strong>of</strong> session.... 27<br />

GENERAL GOVERNMENT.....................................................29<br />

Alternative publication <strong>of</strong> bids for projects funded<br />

by special assessment................................................................29<br />

Met council cost allocation deferred payments permitted ............29<br />

Omnibus state government finance and veterans affairs bill..........29<br />

HEALTH.......................................................................................30<br />

Updating terminology related to persons with disabilities............30<br />

<strong>Minnesota</strong> Insurance Marketplace Act (MNsure).........................30<br />

HOUSING....................................................................................31<br />

Concentration limits <strong>of</strong> community-based homes (group homes)... 31<br />

Contract for deed provision in the omnibus economic<br />

development budget bill...........................................................31<br />

Dual tracking in foreclosure prohibited........................................31<br />

Housing funding and policy provisions in the omnibus<br />

economic development budget bill...........................................31<br />

Housing Improvement Areas extension........................................32<br />

Housing infrastructure bonds provisions in the omnibus<br />

economic development budget bill...........................................32<br />

Mortgage foreclosure consultant and originator clarifications .....32<br />

Partial release <strong>of</strong> mortgage lien....................................................32<br />

Rental eviction appeal timeline and rent escrow changes.............32<br />

LAND USE AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT....................33<br />

Land use provisions in the omnibus jobs bill................................33<br />

LIQUOR.......................................................................................33<br />

Omnibus liquor bill.....................................................................33<br />

LOCAL LAWS..............................................................................34<br />

Officer Tom Decker Memorial Highway Designated...................34<br />

Authority to negotiate certain agreements expanded<br />

to Hennepin County...............................................................34<br />

Local power line planning requirements .....................................34<br />

Local law provisions in the omnibus economic development budget<br />

bill.....................................................................................34<br />

Local provisions in omnibus transportation policy act..................35<br />

Special freight distribution authorized for<br />

west central <strong>Minnesota</strong>.............................................................35<br />

Disaster aid provided to southwest <strong>Minnesota</strong>..............................36<br />

MISCELLANEOUS...................................................................36<br />

Campaign finance modifications..................................................36<br />

Determining legislator salary.......................................................36<br />

Geospatial data sharing with government entities.........................36<br />

Hospital reports required.............................................................36


Contents<br />

<strong>Law</strong>ful gambling modifications....................................................37<br />

Metropolitan Council redistricting..............................................37<br />

MN.IT Services..........................................................................37<br />

Motor vehicle fuel payment........................................................38<br />

PENSIONS AND RETIREMENT.........................................38<br />

Pension plan <strong>of</strong>ficers required to report certain unlawful acts.......38<br />

Omnibus pensions act.................................................................38<br />

Fire and police department aid threshold for financial<br />

reports and audits modified......................................................40<br />

PUBLIC SAFETY.....................................................................41<br />

Omnibus public safety finance act...............................................41<br />

Hazardous substance release report required to local<br />

911 emergency dispatch center.................................................44<br />

Public safety provisions in the omnibus transportation<br />

finance act...............................................................................45<br />

ATV use statutes related to ditches and rights-<strong>of</strong>-way revised.......46<br />

Statewide Radio Board...............................................................46<br />

TAXES.......................................................................................47<br />

Omnibus tax bill ........................................................................47<br />

TELECOMMUNICATIONS....................................................67<br />

Broadband provisions included in omnibus jobs, economic<br />

development, housing, commerce, and energy law....................67<br />

TRANSPORTATION...............................................................68<br />

I-35W bridge remnant steel disposition provided for...................68<br />

Omnibus transportation finance act.............................................68<br />

Special freight distribution authorized for<br />

west central <strong>Minnesota</strong>.............................................................72<br />

Omnibus transportation policy act...............................................72<br />

UTILTIES..................................................................................74<br />

Energy provisions in omnibus jobs act.........................................74<br />

BILLS VETOED BY THE GOVERNOR...............................................76<br />

VETOED: ENVIRONMENT.....................................................76<br />

Legacy spending bill....................................................................76<br />

BILLS THAT DID NOT BECOME LAW (DNBL)................................76<br />

DNBL-AID TO CITIES..............................................................76<br />

Governor’s proposed changes to local government aid program.....76<br />

DNBL-BONDING.......................................................................76<br />

House bonding bill.....................................................................76<br />

“Buy American” steel..................................................................76<br />

DNBL-BUILDLING CODES.....................................................76<br />

Residential sprinklers..................................................................76<br />

DNBL-DATA PRACTICES........................................................76<br />

Classification <strong>of</strong> license plate reader data......................................76<br />

Unauthorized data access security policies and penalties...............77<br />

Creating an exception to the Open Meeting <strong>Law</strong><br />

for social media........................................................................77<br />

DNBL-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT...................................77<br />

Jobs bill extension.......................................................................77<br />

DNBL-ELECTIONS....................................................................77<br />

Early voting................................................................................77<br />

Ranked-choice voting.................................................................77<br />

Felon voting .............................................................................77<br />

June primary...............................................................................77<br />

DNBL-EMPLOYMENT LAW....................................................78<br />

Statewide teacher health insurance pool.......................................78<br />

Minimum wage...........................................................................78<br />

Pregnancy leave...........................................................................78<br />

Prompt payment <strong>of</strong> wages...........................................................78<br />

Overtime hour threshold.............................................................78<br />

DNBL-ENVIRONMENT............................................................78<br />

Water appropriation fee increase..................................................78<br />

Silica sand mining.......................................................................79<br />

Silica sand mining.......................................................................79<br />

State shoreland rules....................................................................79<br />

Legislative water commission.......................................................79<br />

DNBL-LAND USE AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT.........79<br />

Annexation.................................................................................79<br />

Partial discharge <strong>of</strong> easements......................................................79<br />

DNBL-PENSIONS AND RETIREMENT................................80<br />

Increase in police and fire pension aid.........................................80<br />

DNBL-PUBLIC FINANCE........................................................80<br />

Municipal bond interest exemption repeal...................................80<br />

DNBL-PUBLIC SAFETY...........................................................80<br />

Photo-cop...................................................................................80<br />

DNBL-TAXES.............................................................................80<br />

Nonpr<strong>of</strong>its exempted from city fees and service charges...............80<br />

Levy authority to Southeast <strong>Minnesota</strong> Multicounty<br />

Housing and Redevelopment Authority ..................................80<br />

Labor peace agreement................................................................80<br />

Sales tax base broadening to clothing...........................................81<br />

Homeowner property tax refund.................................................81<br />

Gov. Dayton’s tax recommendations............................................81<br />

Tax hearing and notification law changes....................................81<br />

Tax hearing and notification law changes....................................81<br />

Local Sales Tax Bills.....................................................................81<br />

DNBL-TELECOMMUNICATIONS..........................................81<br />

Telecommunications regulation changes......................................81<br />

DNBL-TRANSPORTATION.....................................................82<br />

Municipal street improvement district authority..........................82<br />

Gas tax increase...........................................................................82<br />

Sales tax on gasoline....................................................................82<br />

Mini-trucks.................................................................................82<br />

Appendix A: How to Estimate Your City’s 2014 Levy Limit.......83<br />

Appendix B: City 2014 LGA Estimates.........................................85<br />

<strong>League</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>Cities</strong> Intergovernmental Relations<br />

Department..................................................................................95<br />

<strong>League</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>Cities</strong>


Session <strong>2013</strong><br />

Fiscal Outlook Improves for State, <strong>Cities</strong><br />

The 88 th session <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Minnesota</strong> Legislature began on<br />

Tuesday, Jan. 8 with new House and Senate majorities, 20<br />

first-term senators, 36 first-term representatives, and the<br />

task <strong>of</strong> crafting a biennial state budget and addressing a<br />

projected $1.1 billion deficit for the FY 2014-15 biennium<br />

based on the November 2012 state budget forecast.<br />

With the House, Senate, and governor’s <strong>of</strong>fice controlled<br />

by the Democrats, some speculated that the budgetsetting<br />

task would be simplified and streamlined. The task<br />

was made a bit easier when <strong>Minnesota</strong> Management and<br />

Budget released the semi-annual state budget forecast in<br />

late February, which reported a smaller state budget deficit<br />

<strong>of</strong> $627 million. In early May as the Legislature approached<br />

the final weeks, the budget remained far from complete as<br />

leaders in the House and Senate tussled with Gov. Dayton<br />

on the final details <strong>of</strong> the state budget.<br />

In the last days <strong>of</strong> the session, the House, Senate, and<br />

governor reached agreement on the details <strong>of</strong> the budget<br />

and the last bill was passed at midnight on May 20, the day<br />

prescribed in the state Constitution for adjournment.<br />

Legislative agenda<br />

One indication <strong>of</strong> the priorities <strong>of</strong> the Legislature is the<br />

content <strong>of</strong> the first bill introductions. This year, the first<br />

introductions included bills to restore the school district<br />

aid payment shift, modify and increase the property tax<br />

refund system, appropriate funds for the <strong>Minnesota</strong> investment<br />

fund, modify the <strong>Minnesota</strong> Trade Office, establish<br />

the <strong>Minnesota</strong> Insurance Marketplace, fund all-day kindergarten,<br />

and increase the minimum wage.<br />

In addition, the <strong>League</strong> was working with legislators<br />

to introduce legislation reflecting city policies. Among<br />

the <strong>League</strong> initiatives was a bill that would allow cities<br />

to implement street improvement districts. Another<br />

would authorize cities to impose organized solid waste<br />

collection policies. A third would designate as nonpublic<br />

citizen email addresses collected for the purpose <strong>of</strong><br />

providing alerts and other information to residents. These<br />

are just a few examples <strong>of</strong> bills proposed by the <strong>League</strong><br />

on behalf <strong>of</strong> cities.<br />

Governor’s budget<br />

On Jan. 22, Gov. Dayton released his budget recommendations,<br />

which, as expected, included a fourth-tier income tax.<br />

But perhaps the biggest surprise was the governor’s proposed<br />

expansion <strong>of</strong> the sales tax to a broad array <strong>of</strong> services.<br />

The sales tax expansion took many city <strong>of</strong>ficials by<br />

surprise. Due to the fact that cities are significant consum-<br />

ers <strong>of</strong> many pr<strong>of</strong>essional services, such as legal, accounting,<br />

and engineering services, and due to the fact that cities are<br />

required under law to pay the state sales tax on purchases<br />

<strong>of</strong> those services, the governor’s sales tax base expansion<br />

would have had a large impact on city budgets.<br />

In addition to the sales tax base expansion, Gov.<br />

Dayton proposed a new local government aid (LGA)<br />

formula and a restoration <strong>of</strong> $80 million <strong>of</strong> the funding<br />

reductions that have occurred over the past decade. The<br />

governor’s proposal was guided by a group <strong>of</strong> 15 mayors<br />

from across the state, including co-chairs R.T. Rybak,<br />

City <strong>of</strong> Minneapolis, and Dave Kleis, City <strong>of</strong> St. Cloud.<br />

The governor’s LGA reform panel also included mayors<br />

Bruce Ahlgren, Cloquet; Dave Bartholomay, Circle Pines;<br />

Beth Baumann, South St. Paul; ReNae Bowman, Crystal;<br />

Ardell Brede, Rochester; Chris Coleman, St. Paul; Debbie<br />

Goettel, Richfield; Don Ness, Duluth; Joyce Nyhus,<br />

Buffalo Lake; Alan Oberloh, Worthington; Marlene<br />

Pospeck, Hoyt Lakes; Mary Rossing, Northfield; and Dave<br />

Smiglewski, Granite Falls.<br />

Although many legislators supported the governor’s<br />

recommended LGA appropriation increase and acknowledged<br />

the need to update and reform the one-year-old<br />

LGA formula, his LGA proposal did not immediately catch<br />

fire. Rep. Jim Davnie (DFL-Minneapolis), who was the<br />

new chair <strong>of</strong> the House Property and Local Tax Division,<br />

realized that the governor’s proposal was an important first<br />

step but the plan needed refinements to gain broader support.<br />

Davnie convened a group <strong>of</strong> tax committee legislators<br />

and city representatives to discuss whether common<br />

ground on LGA reform could be found.<br />

After roughly six weeks <strong>of</strong> regular early morning<br />

meetings, the Davnie group, which included representatives<br />

<strong>of</strong> Metro <strong>Cities</strong>, the Coalition <strong>of</strong> Greater <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>Cities</strong>,<br />

and the <strong>League</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>Cities</strong> focused in on an<br />

LGA system proposal that used updated data and recomputed<br />

statistics to allocate LGA funds. The proposal was<br />

drafted into legislation and introduced by Rep. Ben Lien<br />

(DFL-Moorhead) and Sen. Roger Reinert (DFL-Duluth).<br />

That bill was largely included in the final omnibus tax bill<br />

which is now Chapter 143.<br />

As legislative hearings on the governor’s budget plan<br />

began to occur, the <strong>League</strong> approached several legislators<br />

who were former local government <strong>of</strong>ficials and asked if<br />

they would introduce legislation to exempt cities from the<br />

sales tax. During the first month <strong>of</strong> the session, Reps. Peter<br />

Fischer (DFL-Maplewood), Nick Zerwas (R-Elk River),<br />

and Paul Anderson (R-Starbuck) along with Sens. Chuck<br />

<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Summaries</strong> Page 1


Wiger (DFL-Maplewood), Dave Senjem (R-Rochester),<br />

and Ann Rest (DFL-New Hope) all introduced bills.<br />

Although the House did not include the exemption in<br />

its version <strong>of</strong> the omnibus tax bill, the Senate Tax Reform<br />

Division, chaired by Sen. Ann Rest, chose to include the<br />

provision in its division report, which was subsequently<br />

included in the Senate version <strong>of</strong> the omnibus tax bill.<br />

During the conference committee negotiations, Sens. Rest<br />

and Skoe pushed to include the exemption in the final<br />

conference committee report. On May 23, the exemption<br />

was signed into law by the governor as a part <strong>of</strong> the omnibus<br />

tax bill, Chapter 143.<br />

Many <strong>of</strong> the Legislature’s priorities would eventually<br />

find their way to the governor’s desk. In all, the Legislature<br />

would send the governor 144 chapters <strong>of</strong> new law, including<br />

nine omnibus bills that would form the backbone <strong>of</strong><br />

the state’s biennial budget.<br />

Neither a comprehensive transportation funding package,<br />

nor a substantial capital investment bill is among the<br />

144 chapters. Despite efforts on the part <strong>of</strong> transportation<br />

committee chairs and advocates that stretched into<br />

the final days <strong>of</strong> session, the Legislature and governor<br />

failed to agree on a comprehensive transportation funding<br />

increase; and, although the counties secured passage <strong>of</strong><br />

expanded wheelage tax authority and local option sales tax<br />

for transportation authority, the Legislature did not pass the<br />

<strong>League</strong>’s street improvement district initiative. The Legislature<br />

and governor also ended the session without passing a<br />

substantial bonding bill, which may result in demands for<br />

a larger than normal bonding bill in 2014. The slim capital<br />

investment bill that passed authorizes approximately<br />

$176 million in capital projects, $109 million <strong>of</strong> which will<br />

be used to help restore the state Capitol building. (Note:<br />

Additional initiatives that did not become law are summarized<br />

in the Did Not Become <strong>Law</strong> section <strong>of</strong> the <strong>2013</strong><br />

<strong>Law</strong> <strong>Summaries</strong>.)<br />

Other outcomes<br />

In addition to the budget bills, dozens <strong>of</strong> smaller but significant<br />

bills also made it to the finish line. The following is<br />

a sampling <strong>of</strong> bills the governor has signed into law:<br />

• Authority for cities to impose organized solid waste<br />

policies.<br />

• A pension bill that will attempt to stabilize the Public<br />

Employees Retirement Association Police and Fire Plan.<br />

• Classification <strong>of</strong> citizen emails collected by cities as<br />

“non-public.”<br />

• Expansion <strong>of</strong> sick leave and workers’ compensation benefits<br />

for employees.<br />

The future<br />

With the conclusion <strong>of</strong> the <strong>2013</strong> session, the biennial<br />

budget for the state is set until the next odd-year session.<br />

The 2014 session will convene Tuesday, Feb. 25, 2014.<br />

Bills introduced in <strong>2013</strong> that have not been acted upon<br />

remain alive for consideration. The even year session typically<br />

yields a small supplemental budget to compensate<br />

for discrepancies between the budget forecast and actual<br />

revenues, and for unexpected expenses. It also is likely to<br />

produce a bonding bill which, in 2014, may be larger than<br />

in recent even year sessions due to the fact the <strong>2013</strong> bonding<br />

bill did not contain a number <strong>of</strong> popular projects. Gov.<br />

Dayton and all members <strong>of</strong> the House <strong>of</strong> Representatives<br />

will conclude their current terms in 2014, so those seeking<br />

re-election will be eager to finish the session on time and<br />

with victories in hand.<br />

Page 2<br />

<strong>League</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>Cities</strong>


LMC <strong>2013</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Summaries</strong><br />

The <strong>League</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>Cities</strong> (LMC) annually prepares this summary <strong>of</strong> new laws that impact<br />

city operations. This document is intended to highlight relevant new laws, but is not intended to be<br />

comprehensive legal advice. Each law summary includes a reference to the session chapter and bill numbers.<br />

The number <strong>of</strong> the bill that was approved by the Legislature and sent to the governor is denoted with<br />

an asterisk. The chapter number can be used to locate the actual text <strong>of</strong> new laws on the state Revisor <strong>of</strong><br />

Statutes website: www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/laws.<br />

We have also attempted to provide effective dates for each new law; however, occasionally the legislation<br />

may not specify an effective date. If no effective date is provided, Minn. Stat. § 645.02 specifies that each act<br />

(except one making appropriations) enacted finally at any session <strong>of</strong> the Legislature takes effect on Aug. 1,<br />

unless a different date is specified in the act. An act making appropriations enacted finally at any session <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Legislature takes effect on July 1, unless a different date is specified in the act. Each act takes effect at 12:01<br />

a.m. on the day it becomes effective, unless a different time is specified in the act.<br />

Special laws affecting individual cities must generally be approved by the city. The law then becomes<br />

effective the day after the certificate <strong>of</strong> approval is filed with the secretary <strong>of</strong> state (as specified by Minn.<br />

Stat. § 645.021), unless a different date is specified in the act. When approval <strong>of</strong> such a special law is required<br />

by two or more local government units, the law becomes effective the day after the last <strong>of</strong> the required<br />

certificates is filed, unless a different date is specified in the act. If you have questions about a new law,<br />

an effective date, or the legislative process, contact a member <strong>of</strong> the LMC Intergovernmental Relations<br />

Department. Contact information for each staff member is provided here.<br />

The initials <strong>of</strong> <strong>League</strong> staff who<br />

work on legislative issues are<br />

printed following each summary.<br />

For more information, please refer<br />

to the list on the right for contact<br />

information.<br />

An asterisk (*) next to a bill<br />

number denotes the version <strong>of</strong><br />

the bill that was approved by<br />

the Legislature and sent to the<br />

governor.<br />

GC=Gary Carlson, Intergovernmental Relations Director<br />

(651) 281-1255 or gcarlson@lmc.org<br />

HC=Heather Cederholm, Intergovernmental Relations Liaison<br />

(651) 281-1256 or hcederholm@lmc.org<br />

AF=Anne Finn, Assistant Intergovernmental Relations Director<br />

(651) 281-1263 or afinn@lmc.org<br />

PH=Patrick Hynes, Intergovernmental Relations Representative<br />

(651) 281-1260 or phynes@lmc.org<br />

CJ=Craig Johnson, Intergovernmental Relations Representative<br />

(651) 281-1259 or cjohnson@lmc.org<br />

AL=Ann Lindstrom, Intergovernmental Relations Representative<br />

(651) 281-1261 or alindstrom@lmc.org<br />

LZ=Laura Ziegler, Intergovernmental Relations Liaison<br />

(651) 281-1267 or lziegler@lmc.org<br />

<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Summaries</strong> Page 3


Page 4<br />

BONDING<br />

Omnibus bonding bill<br />

Chapter 136 (HF 1070*/SF 960) is the omnibus bonding<br />

bill, which authorizes approximately $176 million in<br />

capital improvement projects. The scope <strong>of</strong> the bonding<br />

bill was agreed upon in the waning hours <strong>of</strong> the legislative<br />

session and there are only five projects and programs<br />

funded—the most notable being the Capitol renovation<br />

and restoration. Below is a list <strong>of</strong> the projects funded:<br />

• $109 million for the Capitol renovation and restoration<br />

project.<br />

• $22.6 million for the construction <strong>of</strong> a Capitol complex<br />

parking facility.<br />

• $20 million to the Department <strong>of</strong> Natural Resources<br />

for the state share <strong>of</strong> flood hazard mitigation grants to<br />

identified cities, counties, and townships for approved<br />

projects.<br />

• $18.9 million for the Minneapolis Veterans Home restoration<br />

and repair.<br />

• $8 million to the Public Facilities Authority to match<br />

$40 million in federal clean water and drinking water<br />

revolving loan fund.<br />

The bonding bill also reauthorized previously authorized<br />

bonds and expanded the allowable use <strong>of</strong> previously<br />

authorized bonds. Below is a list <strong>of</strong> notable projects:<br />

• Fergus Falls Regional Treatment Center. Section<br />

11 expands the use <strong>of</strong> a previously authorized bond<br />

for the treatment center to include hazardous materials<br />

abatement and improvements to basic infrastructure, and<br />

extends the availability <strong>of</strong> the bonds through 2016.<br />

• Old Cedar Avenue Bridge, Bloomington. Section<br />

12 expands the use <strong>of</strong> a $300,000 grant to the City <strong>of</strong><br />

Bloomington to include the renovation, restoration, or<br />

replacement <strong>of</strong> the Old Cedar Avenue Bridge for bicycle<br />

and recreational users. The section also extends the availability<br />

<strong>of</strong> the previously issued bonds through 2017.<br />

Effective May 25, <strong>2013</strong>. (PH)<br />

CIVIL AND CRIMINAL LAW<br />

Redefining “service animal” under the <strong>Minnesota</strong><br />

Human Rights Act<br />

Chapter 14 (HF 1181/SF 1086*) amends Minn. Stat. §<br />

363A.19 by redefining “service animal” in the <strong>Minnesota</strong><br />

Human Rights Act. The definition will now be the same as<br />

the term defined by the federal Americans with Disabilities<br />

Act, as amended. Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>. (PH)<br />

Modifications to the False Claims Act<br />

Chapter 16 (HF290*/SF 281) makes changes to the <strong>Minnesota</strong><br />

False Claims Act (Minn. Stat. Ch. 15C), as directed<br />

by the federal government, to make the <strong>Minnesota</strong> law<br />

conform to the federal False Claims Act. Currently, <strong>Minnesota</strong><br />

and the federal government evenly split the proceeds<br />

<strong>of</strong> recoveries under federal or state false claim<br />

actions. Conformity with the federal act entitles <strong>Minnesota</strong><br />

to recover an additional 10 percent <strong>of</strong> any future recovery.<br />

• Definitions modified. Section 1 expands the definition<br />

<strong>of</strong> “claim,” and adds the defined terms <strong>of</strong> “material”<br />

and “obligation” to the Minn. Stat. § 15C.01. Section 1<br />

also redefines the term “original source” to match federal<br />

law.<br />

• Liability for certain actions. Section 2 removes the<br />

current requirement that the alleged false claim be presented<br />

to the state or subdivision; expands the definition<br />

<strong>of</strong> intent to match federal law; and deletes a limitation<br />

on employer’s liability for certain acts <strong>of</strong> non-managerial<br />

employees.<br />

• Private remedies. Section 3 amends Minn. Stat. §<br />

15C.05 to: remove the provision stating that private<br />

remedies must be limited to money, property, or services;<br />

state that actions cannot be maintained if based upon<br />

information known to the government when the action<br />

was brought; and require dismissal <strong>of</strong> an action (with an<br />

opportunity for objection by the prosecuting attorney) if<br />

based on allegations that were publicly disclosed, unless<br />

brought by the original source <strong>of</strong> information or the<br />

prosecuting attorney.<br />

• Intervention by prosecuting attorney. Section 4<br />

amends Minn. Stat. § 15C.08 to allow an intervening<br />

prosecuting attorney to amend or replace a complaint<br />

brought by a private party and to add additional<br />

claims. Any such pleading relates back to the filing <strong>of</strong> the<br />

private-party complaint for purposes <strong>of</strong> the statute <strong>of</strong><br />

limitations.<br />

• Attorney fees and expenses. Sections 5 and 6 make<br />

the award <strong>of</strong> attorney fees and expenses mandatory if<br />

the person bringing the claim prevails, and clarifies how<br />

awards are distributed to whistleblowers if a prosecuting<br />

attorney intervenes in a claim.<br />

• Whistleblower protection. Section 7 and 8 repeals<br />

the whistleblower provision in Minn. Stat. § 15C.14 and<br />

replaces it with Minn. Stat. § 15C.145, providing protection<br />

from retaliatory action, including reinstatement<br />

at same seniority, double back pay, interest, and special<br />

damages, including attorney fees and court costs. Section<br />

7 establishes a three-year statute <strong>of</strong> limitations for such<br />

claims.<br />

Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>. (PH)<br />

Criminal conduct related to emergency calls modified<br />

Chapter 20 (HF 1043/*SF 1168) amends Minn. Stat. §<br />

609.78 by expanding the list <strong>of</strong> acts that constitute criminal<br />

conduct related to emergency telephone calls. It also<br />

<strong>League</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>Cities</strong>


creates new misdemeanor, gross misdemeanor, and felony<br />

level <strong>of</strong>fenses under the statute and redefines a term.<br />

• Misdemeanor <strong>of</strong>fense provided. Minn. Stat. §<br />

609.78, subd. 1 is amended to make it a misdemeanor<br />

to make or initiate an emergency call, knowing that no<br />

emergency exists, and with the intent to disrupt, interfere<br />

with, or reduce the provision <strong>of</strong> emergency services<br />

or the emergency call center’s resources, remain silent, or<br />

make abusive or harassing statements to the call recipient.<br />

• Gross misdemeanor <strong>of</strong>fense provided. Minn. Stat.<br />

§ 609.78, subd. 2 is amended to make it a gross misdemeanor<br />

<strong>of</strong>fense to: unlawfully place an emergency call<br />

and report a fictitious emergency with the intent <strong>of</strong><br />

prompting an emergency response; and to violate the<br />

new <strong>of</strong>fense established in subdivision 1 for a second<br />

time.<br />

• Felony <strong>of</strong>fense provided. Minn. Stat. § 609.78, subd.<br />

2a is amended to make it a felony <strong>of</strong>fense to report a fictitious<br />

emergency that results in serious injury. A person<br />

who violates the prohibition on fictitious calls established<br />

in subdivision 2 and the call triggers an emergency<br />

response that results in someone suffering great<br />

bodily harm or death is guilty <strong>of</strong> a 10-year felony.<br />

• Other felony <strong>of</strong>fense provided. Minn. Stat. § 609.78,<br />

subd. 2b is amended to make it a five-year <strong>of</strong>fense to<br />

violate subdivision 1 for a third or subsequent time, and<br />

to block, interfere with, overload, or otherwise prevent<br />

the emergency call center’s system from functioning<br />

properly, and these actions make the system unavailable<br />

to someone needing assistance.<br />

• “Emergency call” definition expanded. Minn.<br />

Stat. § 609.78, subd. 3 defines “emergency call.” It is<br />

expanded to include the use <strong>of</strong> any method <strong>of</strong> communication<br />

including, but not limited to: telephones,<br />

facsimiles, voice-over-Internet protocols, email messages,<br />

text messages, and electronic transmissions <strong>of</strong> an image<br />

or video.<br />

Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>. (AF)<br />

Contribution actions related to construction lawsuits<br />

limited<br />

Chapter 21 (HF 450*/SF 392) amends the statute <strong>of</strong><br />

limitations for lawsuits based on improvements to real<br />

property (Minn. Stat. § 541.051). The new law imposes<br />

a 14-year statute <strong>of</strong> repose on contribution and indemnity<br />

claims, which currently must be brought no later<br />

than two years after the contribution or indemnity action<br />

accrued. In some circumstances, under the current statute<br />

<strong>of</strong> limitations and repose, a construction defect claim<br />

can be brought nearly 12 years after substantial completion<br />

<strong>of</strong> a project, and a contribution and indemnity claim<br />

can potentially accrue after trial or appeal, leaving open<br />

questions <strong>of</strong> liability for many years. The change was made<br />

at the request <strong>of</strong> engineers and architects, who are <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

subject to contribution and indemnity claims on construction<br />

projects. Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>, and applies to actions commenced<br />

on or after that date. (PH)<br />

Crime victim provisions modified<br />

Chapter 34 (HF 1501/SF 769*) amends various crime victim<br />

provisions. It classifies as private data identifying information<br />

<strong>of</strong> a victim or other person requesting notification<br />

regarding a defendant’s release from custody. It expands<br />

protections for crime victims against employer retaliation.<br />

Finally, it updates terminology and creates a working group<br />

to study restitution.<br />

• Release <strong>of</strong> arrested, detained or confined person<br />

notice modified. Section 1 creates Minn. Stat. §<br />

13.854. It provides that for requests for notification <strong>of</strong><br />

change in custody status <strong>of</strong> an arrested, detained, or confined<br />

person from the Department <strong>of</strong> Corrections or<br />

other custodial authority made through an automated<br />

electronic notification system, all identifying information<br />

regarding the person requesting notification, and that the<br />

notice was requested and provided to that person by the<br />

automated system is classified as private data on individuals<br />

as defined in section 13.02, subd. 12, and is accessible<br />

only to that person.<br />

• Victim data classified. Section 2 adds a provision to<br />

Minn. Stat. § 13.871, subd. 5. It provides that data on<br />

victims requesting a notice <strong>of</strong> release <strong>of</strong> an arrested or<br />

detained person are classified under Minn. Stat. § 629.72<br />

(pertaining to bail, domestic abuse, harassment, violation<br />

<strong>of</strong> order for protection or no contact order) and Minn.<br />

Stat. § 629.73 (pertaining to notice to crime victims,<br />

release <strong>of</strong> arrested or detained person).<br />

• “Violent crime” definition modified to include<br />

stalking. Section 3 amends Minn. Stat. § 611A.0315 by<br />

replacing the word “harassment” with the word “stalking”<br />

in the definition <strong>of</strong> “violent crime.”<br />

• Stalking victims attendance at criminal proceedings<br />

protected. Section 4 amends Minn. Stat. §<br />

611A.036, subd. 7, by adding the crime <strong>of</strong> stalking to the<br />

definition <strong>of</strong> “violent crime” for purposes <strong>of</strong> prohibiting<br />

employer retaliation when an employee takes time <strong>of</strong>f<br />

work to attend criminal proceedings.<br />

• “Stalking” replaces “harassment.” Sections 5, 6, 7<br />

and 9 amend various provisions in Minn. Stat. § 629.72<br />

by replacing the word “harassment” with the word<br />

“stalking.” This section pertains to bail, domestic abuse,<br />

harassment, violation <strong>of</strong> order for protection, and no<br />

contact orders.<br />

• Victim data private. Section 8 adds a provision to<br />

Minn. Stat. § 629.72, subd. 6. It provides that data on the<br />

victim and the notice provided by the custodial authority<br />

are private data on individuals as defined in Minn.<br />

Stat. § 13.02, subd. 12, and are accessible only to the victim.<br />

<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Summaries</strong> Page 5


• Technical changes and victim data classification<br />

provided. Section 10 amends Minn. Stat. § 629.73<br />

updates obsolete references to the Department <strong>of</strong> Corrections<br />

and replaces them with the Office <strong>of</strong> Justice<br />

programs in the Department <strong>of</strong> Public Safety. It also classifies<br />

as private data on individuals all identifying information<br />

regarding a victim, including, but not limited<br />

to, the notice provided custodial authority regarding an<br />

arrested person’s release.<br />

• Working group established. Section 11 is a <strong>2013</strong> Session<br />

<strong>Law</strong> that requires the Department <strong>of</strong> Public Safety<br />

to convene a working group by Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>, to study<br />

how restitution is currently being requested, ordered,<br />

and collected in <strong>Minnesota</strong>, to include the Department<br />

<strong>of</strong> Corrections, city and county prosecuting agencies,<br />

statewide crime victim coalitions, the <strong>Minnesota</strong> Judicial<br />

Branch, county probation departments, the <strong>Minnesota</strong><br />

Association <strong>of</strong> Community Corrections Act counties,<br />

and the <strong>Minnesota</strong> Board <strong>of</strong> Public Defenders. It<br />

requires the commissioner <strong>of</strong> the Department <strong>of</strong> Public<br />

Safety to file the report with the Legislature by an<br />

unspecified date in January 2015.<br />

Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>. (AF)<br />

Domestic abuse provisions modified<br />

Chapter 47 amends (HF 1400*/SF 1423) makes several<br />

changes to violations related to orders for protection,<br />

qualified domestic violence-related <strong>of</strong>fenses, harassment<br />

restraining orders, and domestic abuse no contact orders.<br />

• “Knowingly” stricken from enhanced orders<br />

for protection (OFPs) violation penalty.<br />

Section 1 amends Minn. Stat. § 518B.01, subd. 14, by<br />

striking the term “knowingly” from the provisions<br />

regarding enhanced penalties for violations <strong>of</strong> OFPs.<br />

Current law provides that a violation by a person<br />

who knows <strong>of</strong> the order is guilty <strong>of</strong> a misdemeanor.<br />

A misdemeanor violation is enhanced to a gross<br />

misdemeanor or felony if it’s a repeat violation or<br />

other circumstances apply. The enhanced penalties<br />

require that the person know <strong>of</strong> the OFP and commit<br />

the violation “knowingly.” These sections strike the<br />

latter, additional requirement for enhanced penalties;<br />

accordingly, all the penalty levels would have the same<br />

knowledge requirement.<br />

• Venues for OFP violations expanded. Section 2<br />

adds a section to Minn. Stat. § 518B.01. It provides that<br />

a person may be prosecuted under the jurisdiction <strong>of</strong> the<br />

place where any call is made or received or, in the case<br />

<strong>of</strong> wireless or electronic communication or any communication<br />

made through any available technologies, where<br />

the actor or victim resides, or in the jurisdiction <strong>of</strong> the<br />

victim’s designated address if the victim participates in<br />

the address confidentiality program established under<br />

Chapter 5B.<br />

Page 6<br />

• “Family or household member” requirement<br />

eliminated. Section 3 amends Minn. Stat. § 609.2242,<br />

subd. 2. It eliminates the requirement that a misdemeanor<br />

domestic assault may only be enhanced to a<br />

gross misdemeanor if a previous qualified domestic<br />

violence-related <strong>of</strong>fense (QDVRO) was “against a family<br />

or household member.” The definition <strong>of</strong> QDVRO<br />

is in Minn. Stat. S 609.02, subd. 16, and contains crimes<br />

that are not required to be committed against a family or<br />

household member (e.g., murder, assault, criminal sexual<br />

conduct crimes).<br />

• “Knowingly” stricken from enhanced harassment<br />

restraining orders (HROs) violation penalty. Section<br />

4 amends Minn. Stat. § 609.748, subd. 6, by striking<br />

the term “knowingly” from the provisions regarding<br />

enhanced penalties for violations <strong>of</strong> HROs. Current<br />

law provides that a violation by a person who knows <strong>of</strong><br />

the order is guilty <strong>of</strong> a misdemeanor. A misdemeanor<br />

violation is enhanced to a gross misdemeanor or felony<br />

if it’s a repeat violation or other circumstances apply.<br />

The enhanced penalties require that the person know<br />

<strong>of</strong> the order and commit the violation “knowingly.”<br />

These sections strike the latter, additional requirement<br />

for enhanced penalties; accordingly, all the penalty levels<br />

would have the same knowledge requirement.<br />

• “Knowingly” stricken from enhanced domestic<br />

abuse no contact orders (DANCOs) violation<br />

penalty. Section 5 amends Minn. Stat. § 629.75, subd,<br />

2, by striking the term “knowingly” from the provisions<br />

regarding enhanced penalties for violations <strong>of</strong> DANCOs.<br />

Current law provides that a violation by a person who<br />

knows <strong>of</strong> the order is guilty <strong>of</strong> a misdemeanor. A misdemeanor<br />

violation is enhanced to a gross misdemeanor<br />

or felony if it’s a repeat violation or other circumstances<br />

apply. The enhanced penalties require that the person<br />

know <strong>of</strong> the order and commit the violation “knowingly.”<br />

These sections strike the latter, additional requirement<br />

for enhanced penalties; accordingly, all the penalty<br />

levels would have the same knowledge requirement.<br />

• Venues for DANCO violations expanded. Section<br />

6 adds a subdivision to Minn. Stat. § 629.75. It provides<br />

that a person may be prosecuted at the place where any<br />

call is made or received, or, in the case <strong>of</strong> wireless or<br />

electronic communication or any communication made<br />

through any available technologies, where the actor or<br />

victim resides, or in the jurisdiction <strong>of</strong> the victim’s designated<br />

address if the victim participates in the address<br />

confidentiality program established under chapter 5B.<br />

• Evidence <strong>of</strong> conduct modified. Section 7 amends<br />

Minn. Stat. § 634.20. It strikes the term “similar” and<br />

replaces it with “domestic.” Currently, this section provides<br />

that evidence <strong>of</strong> “similar conduct” by the accused<br />

against a victim <strong>of</strong> domestic abuse is admissible. Changing<br />

the terminology would provide that conduct does<br />

not have to be “similar” to domestic abuse—which<br />

<strong>League</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>Cities</strong>


involves a physical assault or threat. Instead, the term is<br />

changed to “domestic conduct,” which is defined as evidence<br />

<strong>of</strong> domestic abuse, violation <strong>of</strong> an OFP or HRO,<br />

stalking, or harassing phone calls.<br />

Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>. (AF)<br />

Service <strong>of</strong> process in contested case review<br />

Chapter 56 (HF 1120*/SF 516) amends the Administrative<br />

Procedures Act, Minn. Stat. § 14.63. The act will now<br />

require a party petitioning for judicial review <strong>of</strong> a contested<br />

case to serve the petition on the Court, the state<br />

agency, and all parties to the contested case. Effective Aug. 1,<br />

<strong>2013</strong>, and applies to an appeal <strong>of</strong> a final decision in a contested<br />

case rendered on or after that date. (PH)<br />

Money used to facilitate prostitution or sex trafficking<br />

forfeiture provided<br />

Chapter 80 (HF 411/SF 346*) amends Minn. Stat. §<br />

609.5312 pertaining to forfeiture <strong>of</strong> property associated<br />

with designated <strong>of</strong>fenses. In particular, it authorizes forfeiture<br />

<strong>of</strong> money used or intended to be used to facilitate the<br />

commission <strong>of</strong> a prostitution or sex trafficking <strong>of</strong>fense.<br />

• Money subject to forfeiture. Section 1 amends Minn.<br />

Stat. 609.5312, subd. 1, pertaining to property forfeiture.<br />

It adds a provision that says money used or intended to<br />

be used to facilitate the commission <strong>of</strong> a violation <strong>of</strong><br />

Minn. Stat. § 609.322 or Minn. Stat. § 609.324 or a violation<br />

<strong>of</strong> a local ordinance substantially similar, is subject<br />

to forfeiture.<br />

• Disposition <strong>of</strong> money provided. Sections 2, 3 and 4<br />

amend Minn. Stat. § 609.5315 by adding a new subdivision.<br />

It provides that money forfeited as part <strong>of</strong> a prostitution<br />

or sex trafficking <strong>of</strong>fense must be distributed as<br />

follows:<br />

• 40 percent must be forwarded to the appropriate agency<br />

for deposit as a supplement to the agency’s operating<br />

fund or similar fund for use in law enforcement;<br />

• 20 percent must be forwarded to the prosecuting<br />

authority that handled the forfeiture for deposit as a<br />

supplement to its operating fund or similar fund for<br />

prosecutorial purposes; and,<br />

• The remaining 40 percent must be forwarded to the<br />

commissioner <strong>of</strong> public safety to be deposited in the<br />

safe harbor for youth account in the special revenue<br />

fund, and are appropriated to the commissioner for<br />

distribution to crime victims services organizations<br />

that provide services to sexually exploited youth, as<br />

defined in section 260C.007, subdivision 31.<br />

Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>. (AF)<br />

Restrictions on indemnification agreements in construction<br />

contracts<br />

Chapter 88 (HF 644/SF 561*) amends Minn. Stat. §<br />

337.05 to prohibit provisions in construction contracts<br />

that require a party to provide insurance coverage to one<br />

or more parties for the negligence or intentional acts or<br />

omissions <strong>of</strong> the other parties, including third parties. This<br />

changes the long-standing practice in construction contracts<br />

whereby a subcontractor indemnifies a general contractor<br />

for the negligence <strong>of</strong> the general contractor, and<br />

general contractors indemnify owners for the negligence<br />

<strong>of</strong> the owner. These provisions were allowed under law<br />

only to the extent the contract required the indemnitor<br />

to obtain insurance. The new law contains exceptions to<br />

allow project-specific insurance policies like Builder’s Risk<br />

to remain enforceable. The law also allows an indemnitor<br />

to obtain insurance coverage for the indemnitee’s vicarious<br />

or warranty liability. Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>, and applies to<br />

agreements signed or accepted on or after that date. (PH)<br />

Expanding the limitations period for civil actions<br />

involving sexual abuse<br />

Chapter 89 (HF 681*/SF 534), the “Child Victims Act,”<br />

amends Minn. Stat. § 541.073 to eliminate the statute<br />

<strong>of</strong> limitations for certain sexual abuse claims. For claims<br />

against the perpetrator, the following limitations periods<br />

apply:<br />

• If the victim was 18 years or older: six years.<br />

• If the victim was younger than 18 years old, there is no<br />

statute <strong>of</strong> limitations.<br />

• If the victim was a minor and the accused perpetrator<br />

was younger than 14 years old, then the claim must be<br />

brought before the plaintiff is 24 years old.<br />

Claims for vicarious liability or respondeat superior<br />

must be commenced within six years <strong>of</strong> the alleged abuse,<br />

or if the plaintiff was a minor, than before the plaintiff is 24<br />

years old.<br />

In the case <strong>of</strong> alleged sexual abuse <strong>of</strong> a minor, an otherwise<br />

time-barred claim may be commenced against a<br />

person, corporation, or other entity no later than three<br />

years following the enactment date and applies to claims<br />

pending or commenced on or after that date. The lookback<br />

provision does not apply to claims for vicarious<br />

liability or respondeat superior. Effective May 25, <strong>2013</strong>, and<br />

applies to claims that were not time-barred before the effective date,<br />

except for claims brought under the look-back provision. (PH)<br />

Prohibiting exclusion from jury service<br />

Chapter 90 (HF 335*/SF 41) amends Minn. Stat. §<br />

593.32, subd. 1 and prohibits a citizen from being excluding<br />

from jury service on the basis <strong>of</strong> marital status and<br />

sexual orientation. The current statute prohibits exclusion<br />

from jury service on account <strong>of</strong> race, color, religion, sex,<br />

national origin, economic status, or a physical or sensory<br />

disability. Rule 809 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Minnesota</strong> General Rules <strong>of</strong><br />

Practice for the District Courts already prohibits exclusion<br />

from jury service based on marital status. Effective<br />

Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>. (PH)<br />

<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Summaries</strong> Page 7


Restrictions on enforceability <strong>of</strong> liability waivers<br />

Chapter 118 (HF 792*/SF 768) makes unenforceable an<br />

agreement that purports to release, limit, or waive liability<br />

for damage, injuries, or death resulting from conduct that<br />

constitutes greater than ordinary negligence. An unenforceable<br />

portion <strong>of</strong> an agreement is severable from an<br />

agreement that waives liability for damages resulting from<br />

conduct constituting ordinary negligence or inherent risks.<br />

The new law, Minn. Stat. § 604.055, does not apply to<br />

claims against the municipalities or the state. The original<br />

bill made unenforceable any liability waiver for damage<br />

arising out <strong>of</strong> the negligent operation, maintenance, or<br />

design <strong>of</strong> a party’s premises, and included municipal waivers.<br />

The new law is a compromise that attempts to codify<br />

<strong>Minnesota</strong> case law on the enforceability <strong>of</strong> indemnity<br />

agreements. Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>, and applies to agreements<br />

signed or accepted on or after that date. (PH)<br />

Underage possession or consumption immunity<br />

provided for a person seeking assistance for another<br />

Chapter 112 (HF 946*/SF 744) adds a subdivision to<br />

Minn. Stat. § 340A.503, the law pertaining to underage<br />

possession and consumption <strong>of</strong> alcohol. It provides that if<br />

a person contacts a 911 operator to report that the person<br />

or another person is in need <strong>of</strong> medical assistance for an<br />

immediate health or safety concern, the person is not subject<br />

to prosecution under this law. The immunity applies<br />

if the person is the first person who initiates contact. The<br />

person must also provide a name and contact information,<br />

remain on the scene until assistance arrives, and cooperate<br />

with the authorities at the scene. The person who receives<br />

medical assistance is also immune from prosecution. The<br />

law also applies to one or two persons acting in concert<br />

with the person initiating contact provided that all the<br />

same requirements are met. Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>. (AF)<br />

Transit operator assault criminal penalties prescribed<br />

Chapter 133 (HF 590*/SF 1068) adds a subdivision to<br />

Minn. Stat § 609.2231. It provides that a person is guilty <strong>of</strong><br />

a gross misdemeanor if the person assaults a transit operator,<br />

or intentionally throws or otherwise transfers bodily<br />

fluids onto a transit operator; and the transit operator is<br />

acting in the course <strong>of</strong> the operator’s duties and is operating<br />

a transit vehicle, aboard a transit vehicle. A person convicted<br />

<strong>of</strong> this <strong>of</strong>fense may be sentenced to imprisonment<br />

for not more than one year or to payment <strong>of</strong> a fine <strong>of</strong> not<br />

more than $3,000, or both. Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>. (AF)<br />

Increased penalties for wildfire arson provided<br />

Chapter 139 (HF 228*/SF 614) creates increased penalties<br />

for wildfire arson that damages multiple buildings or dwellings,<br />

acreage, or crops, or causes someone to suffer demonstrable<br />

harm. In addition, it adds restitution provisions.<br />

Page 8<br />

• Maximum sentences provided. Section 2 adds a subdivision<br />

to Minn. Stat. § 609.5641. It creates increased<br />

felony penalties for wildfire arson based on certain damages.<br />

Imposes a maximum sentence as follows:<br />

• Where fire causes another person to suffer demonstrable<br />

bodily harm, ten years imprisonment and/or<br />

$15,000 fine;<br />

• Where the fire threatens to damage or damages in<br />

excess <strong>of</strong> five buildings or dwellings, burns 500 or<br />

more acres, or results in over $100,000 in crop damage,<br />

ten years imprisonment and/or $15,000 fine; and,<br />

• Where the fire threatens to damage or damages in<br />

excess <strong>of</strong> 100 buildings or dwellings, burns 1,500 or<br />

more acres, or results in over $250,000 in crop damage,<br />

20 years imprisonment and/or $25,000.<br />

• It provides that a building or dwelling “is threatened”<br />

when there is a probability <strong>of</strong> damage to the dwelling<br />

requiring evacuation for safety <strong>of</strong> life.<br />

• Restitution provided. Section 3 amends Minn. Stat. §<br />

609.5641, subd. 3 by providing that, in addition to the<br />

sentence otherwise authorized, the court may order a<br />

person who is convicted <strong>of</strong> violating this section to pay<br />

fire suppression costs and damages to the owner <strong>of</strong> the<br />

damaged land, costs associated with injuries sustained by<br />

a member <strong>of</strong> a municipal or volunteer fire department in<br />

the performance <strong>of</strong> the member’s duties, and any other<br />

restitution costs allowed under Minn. Stat. § 611A.04.<br />

Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>. (AF)<br />

COMMERCE<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce technical bill<br />

Chapter 135 (HF 1221*/SF 626) is the Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Commerce technical and housekeeping bill. While the<br />

majority <strong>of</strong> provisions do not impact cities, the following<br />

items may be <strong>of</strong> interest.<br />

• Electronic service <strong>of</strong> Public Utilities Commission<br />

(PUC) documents. Article 3, sections 18-20 amend<br />

Minn. Stat. §§ 216.17-.18 and require that regulated<br />

utilities provide the PUC with an electronic address<br />

for electronic service purposes, and agree to accept<br />

electronic service as <strong>of</strong>ficial service. This applies to all<br />

notices, orders, and documents sent by the PUC, as well<br />

as documents required to be served by parties, participants,<br />

or other interested persons.<br />

Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>. (PH)<br />

Bullion coin dealers regulated<br />

Chapter 120 (HF 157*/SF 382) provides for regulation <strong>of</strong><br />

“bullion coin dealers” and “coin dealer representatives” by<br />

the Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce. “Bullion coins” are coins<br />

that contain more than 1 percent by weight <strong>of</strong> a precious<br />

metal such as gold; they are sold as an investment.<br />

<strong>League</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>Cities</strong>


• Bullion terms defined. Section 1 creates. Minn. Stat. §<br />

80G.01. It defines the terms “bullion coin,” “bullion coin<br />

dealer,” “coin dealer representative,” “commissioner,”<br />

“owner,” “person,” and “precious metal content.” A “coin<br />

dealer representative” is an individual who represents a<br />

bullion coin dealer in transactions with consumers.<br />

• Registration required. Section 2 creates Minn. Stat.<br />

§ 80G.02. It requires that bullion coin dealers and coin<br />

dealer representatives be registered annually with the<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce before doing business in this<br />

state. It provides that registration starts July 1, 2014, if a<br />

dealer has engaged annually in transactions that exceed<br />

$5,000 in the aggregate, or once the dealer’s transactions<br />

reach $5,000, and requires continued registration regardless<br />

<strong>of</strong> future transaction amounts.<br />

• Registration denial provided. Section 3 creates<br />

Minn. Stat. § 80G.03. It provides that the Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Commerce may by order, suspend, revoke, or refuse to<br />

issue or renew a registration for misrepresentation, fraud,<br />

and other violations <strong>of</strong> the law specified in the chapter.<br />

It permits the commissioner to take action against a bullion<br />

coin dealer for a violation by its coin dealer representative<br />

or directly against the representative, provided<br />

that the coin dealer representative was acting on behalf<br />

<strong>of</strong> the bullion coin dealer. It allows the institution <strong>of</strong> a<br />

revocation proceeding and imposition <strong>of</strong> civil penalties<br />

within two years after registration was last effective, and<br />

prohibits new applications for two years after the effective<br />

date <strong>of</strong> the revocation.<br />

• Denial required for criminal convictions. Section<br />

4 creates Minn. Stat. § 80G.04. It requires denial <strong>of</strong> an<br />

application for registration if the applicant has within the<br />

last 10 years, been convicted <strong>of</strong> a financial crime or <strong>of</strong><br />

any crime involving fraud or theft.<br />

• Screening process required. Section 5 creates Minn.<br />

Stat. § 80G.05. It requires the following:<br />

• A bullion coin dealer must screen each <strong>of</strong> its owners,<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficers, and coin dealer representatives before submitting<br />

an initial application and at each renewal.<br />

• The results <strong>of</strong> the screenings must be provided to the<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce at initial registration and<br />

each renewal, if requested by the department.<br />

• A national criminal history record search, court judgment<br />

search, and county criminal history search for all<br />

counties in which the applicant has lived within the<br />

preceding 10 years must be included.<br />

• The bullion coin dealer must use a reputable vendor<br />

that is authorized to do business in <strong>Minnesota</strong> and that<br />

specializes in conducting background screenings.<br />

• Surety bond requirement provided. Section 6 creates<br />

Minn. Stat. § 80G.06. It requires that a bullion coin<br />

dealer maintain a surety bond in an amount equal at least<br />

to the total purchase and sale transactions with consumers<br />

at retail in the preceding 12 months, but the bond<br />

amount need not exceed $200,000. It provides that<br />

aggrieved consumers and the Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce<br />

or attorney general may file a claim with the surety on<br />

the bond and may sue the surety if the claim is denied.<br />

• Certain conduct prohibited. Section 7 creates Minn.<br />

Stat. § 80G.07, which lists 15 things that bullion coin<br />

dealers and coin dealer representatives are prohibited<br />

from doing. From Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>, to June 30, 2014, it only<br />

applies to dealers with annual transactions exceeding<br />

$5,000. On or after July 1, 2014 it applies to any dealer<br />

required to be registered under the chapter.<br />

• Misdemeanor crime provided. Section 8 creates<br />

Minn. Stat. § 80G.08. It provides that it is a misdemeanor<br />

for a bullion coin dealer or coin dealer representative to:<br />

• Fail to register and maintain registration with the<br />

commissioner under this act;<br />

• Fail to deliver purchased bullion coins to a consumer<br />

within 30 days or at the agreed-upon time; or<br />

• Fail to pay a consumer for bullion coins sold and<br />

delivered to a dealer or representative within 30 days<br />

or at the agreed-upon time.<br />

• Local authority provided. Section 9 creates Minn.<br />

Stat. § 80G.09. It provides that nothing in this ch. 80G<br />

prevents a lawsuit for securities fraud under ch. 80A or<br />

preempts local authority under Minn. Stat. § 325F.742<br />

(regulation <strong>of</strong> precious metal dealers).<br />

• Investigations and civil enforcement provided.<br />

Section 10 creates Minn. Stat. § 80G.10. It provides the<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce with enforcement authority<br />

provided in this section and Minn. Stat. § 45.027, including<br />

imposition <strong>of</strong> civil penalties.<br />

Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>. (AF)<br />

Scrap metal processing regulations modifications<br />

and criminal penalties establishment<br />

Chapter 126 (HF 1214*/SF 934) amends and expands<br />

licensing and regulatory provisions in chapters 168, 168A,<br />

and 325E relating to scrap metal and vehicle purchases.<br />

• “Hulk” exception eliminated. Section 1 amends<br />

Minn. Stat. § 168.27, subd. 1a. It eliminates the “hulk”<br />

exception for scrap metal processor licensing. This has<br />

the effect <strong>of</strong> requiring a license for businesses engaged<br />

in buying hulks for scrap. (A “hulk” is a vehicle that is<br />

incapable <strong>of</strong> moving under its own power and has had<br />

valuable used parts removed. Its sole value is its metallic<br />

content.) Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Injunctive relief and civil penalties provided. Section<br />

2 amends Minn. Stat. § 168.27, subd. 19a. It authorizes<br />

injunctive relief and civil penalties for violations<br />

<strong>of</strong> licensing and regulatory provisions relating to scrap<br />

metal dealers, scrap metal processors, and salvage pools.<br />

Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• County and city attorney prosecuting authority<br />

provided. Section 3 amends Minn. Stat. § 168.27, subd.<br />

<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Summaries</strong> Page 9


23. It provides that the city or county attorney is the<br />

agency responsible for prosecuting violations relating to<br />

licensing and regulation <strong>of</strong> vehicle dealers or scrap metal<br />

dealers. Previous law made the Department <strong>of</strong> Motor<br />

Vehicles responsible for filing charges. Effective Aug. 13,<br />

<strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Certificate <strong>of</strong> title maintenance required. Section<br />

4 amends Minn. Stat. § 168A.15, subd. 3 to require<br />

a dealer who purchases a vehicle for scrap to maintain<br />

the certificate <strong>of</strong> title for three years before destroying it.<br />

Effective Aug. 13, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Scrap metal processing regulated. Section 5 creates<br />

Minn. Stat. § 168A.1501, which provides scrap metal<br />

processing regulations.<br />

• Definitions provided. Section 5, subd 1. provides<br />

that “law enforcement agency” or “agency” means a<br />

duly authorized municipal, county, state, or federal law<br />

enforcement agency. “Scrap vehicle” means a motor<br />

vehicle purchased primarily as scrap, for its reuse or<br />

recycling value as raw metal, or for dismantling for<br />

parts. “Scrap vehicle operator” or “operator” means the<br />

following persons who engage in a transaction involving<br />

the purchase or acquisition <strong>of</strong> a scrap vehicle: scrap<br />

metal processors licensed under Minn. Stat. § 168.27,<br />

subd. 1a(c); used vehicle parts dealers licensed under<br />

Minn. Stat. § 168.27, subd. 1a(d); scrap metal dealers<br />

under Minn. Stat. § 325E.21; and junk yards under<br />

Minn. Stat. § 471.925. “Interchange file specification<br />

format” means the most recent version <strong>of</strong> the Minneapolis<br />

automated property system interchange file<br />

specification format. Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Purchase or acquisition record required. Section<br />

5, subd. 2 provides that every scrap vehicle operator<br />

must create a permanent record written in English,<br />

at the time <strong>of</strong> each purchase or acquisition <strong>of</strong> a scrap<br />

vehicle. The section outlines the information required<br />

to be kept as part <strong>of</strong> the record, which must at all reasonable<br />

times be open to the inspection <strong>of</strong> any properly<br />

identified law enforcement <strong>of</strong>ficer.<br />

··<br />

Exceptions. No record is required for property<br />

purchased from manufacturers, salvage pools,<br />

merchants operating under a contract with a scrap<br />

vehicle operator, insurance companies, rental car<br />

companies, financial institutions, charities, dealers<br />

licensed under Minn. Stat. § 168.27, or wholesale<br />

dealers. <strong>Law</strong> enforcement agencies may conduct<br />

regular and routine inspections to ensure compliance,<br />

refer violations to the city or county attorney<br />

for criminal prosecution, and notify the registrar <strong>of</strong><br />

motor vehicles.<br />

··<br />

Personal information protected. An operator<br />

may not disclose personal information concerning a<br />

customer without the customer’s consent unless the<br />

disclosure is required by law or made in response to<br />

Page 10<br />

a request from a law enforcement agency. An operator<br />

must implement reasonable safeguards to protect<br />

the security <strong>of</strong> the personal information, defined as<br />

any individually identifiable information gathered in<br />

connection with a record. Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Retention required. Section 5, subd. 3 requires<br />

records to be retained by the scrap vehicle operator for<br />

a period <strong>of</strong> three years. Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Payment by check or electronic transfer<br />

required. Section 5, subd. 4. requires a scrap vehicle<br />

operator or the operator’s agent, employee, or representative<br />

to pay for all scrap vehicle purchases only by<br />

check or electronic transfer. Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Automated property system reporting required.<br />

Section 5, subd. 5 provides that a scrap vehicle operator<br />

must completely and accurately provide all the<br />

record information required by transferring it from the<br />

operator’s computer to the automated property system,<br />

by the close <strong>of</strong> business each day, using the interchange<br />

file specification format. An operator who does not<br />

have an electronic point-<strong>of</strong>-sale program may request<br />

to be provided s<strong>of</strong>tware by the automated property<br />

system to record the required information. If the operator<br />

uses a commercially available electronic point<strong>of</strong>-sale<br />

program to record the information required in<br />

this section, it must submit the information using the<br />

interchange file specification format. Any record submitted<br />

by an operator that does not conform to the<br />

interchange file specification format must be corrected<br />

and resubmitted the next business day. An operator<br />

must display a sign <strong>of</strong> sufficient size, in a conspicuous<br />

place in the premises, which informs all patrons<br />

that transactions are reported to law enforcement daily.<br />

Every local law enforcement agency must participate<br />

in the automated property system as an individual<br />

agency or in conjunction with another agency or<br />

agencies to provide the service. Effective Jan. 1, 2015.<br />

• Additional reporting required. Section 5, subd. 6<br />

provides that, in addition to the requirements under<br />

subd. 5, an operator who is not licensed under Minn.<br />

Stat. § 168.27 and an operator who purchases a scrap<br />

vehicle under subd. 9 must submit information on<br />

the purchase or acquisition <strong>of</strong> a scrap vehicle to the<br />

National Motor Vehicle Title Information System by<br />

the close <strong>of</strong> business the following day. Effective Aug. 1,<br />

<strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Vehicle with pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> ownership; title or bill <strong>of</strong><br />

sale required. Section 5, subd. 7 provides that no<br />

person shall purchase a scrap vehicle unless the seller:<br />

(1) provides the vehicle title and lien releases, if the<br />

vehicle is subject to any liens, or an <strong>of</strong>ficial bill <strong>of</strong> sale<br />

issued by a public impound lot, each listing the vehicle<br />

identification number; (2) provides pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> identification;<br />

and (3) signs a statement, under penalty <strong>of</strong> perjury<br />

attesting that the motor vehicle is not stolen and<br />

<strong>League</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>Cities</strong>


is free <strong>of</strong> any liens or encumbrances and that the seller<br />

has the right to sell the motor vehicle. Effective Aug. 1,<br />

<strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Vehicle without pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> ownership; certain<br />

older vehicles. Section 5, subd. 8. Provides a process<br />

to allow the purchase <strong>of</strong> a scrap vehicle without pro<strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> ownership under certain circumstances. Effective Aug.<br />

1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Vehicle without pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> ownership; vehicles for<br />

dismantling. Section 5, subd. 9 provides a process<br />

to allow the dismantling <strong>of</strong> vehicle without pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

ownership under certain circumstances. Effective Aug. 1,<br />

<strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Exempt purchases. Section 5, subd. 10 provides that<br />

subd. 7, 8, and 9 do not apply when a scrap vehicle is:<br />

(1) purchased from a manufacturer, salvage pool, merchant<br />

operating under a contract with a scrap vehicle<br />

operator, insurance company, rental car company,<br />

financial institution, charity, dealer licensed under<br />

Minn. Stat. § 168.27, or wholesale dealers, having an<br />

established place <strong>of</strong> business, or <strong>of</strong> any goods purchased<br />

at open sale from any bankrupt stock; or (2) an<br />

inoperable motor vehicle with a manufacturer’s designated<br />

model year equal to or less than the 20th year<br />

immediately preceding the current calendar year. Effective<br />

Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Criminal penalty provided. Section 5, subd. 11<br />

provides that a scrap vehicle operator, or the agent,<br />

employee, or representative <strong>of</strong> the operator, who<br />

intentionally violates a provision <strong>of</strong> this section, is<br />

guilty <strong>of</strong> a misdemeanor. Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Investigative holds; scrap vehicle or parts. Section<br />

5, subd. 12 provides that whenever a law enforcement<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficial from any agency has probable cause to<br />

believe that a scrap vehicle or motor vehicle parts in<br />

the possession <strong>of</strong> a scrap vehicle operator are stolen<br />

or evidence <strong>of</strong> a crime and notifies the operator not<br />

to sell the item, the scrap vehicle operator must not:<br />

(1) process or sell the item; or (2) remove or allow<br />

its removal from the premises. This investigative hold<br />

must be confirmed in writing by the originating<br />

agency within 72 hours and will remain in effect for<br />

30 days from the date <strong>of</strong> initial notification, or until<br />

the investigative hold is canceled or renewed, or until a<br />

law enforcement notification to confiscate or directive<br />

to release is issued, whichever comes first. If a scrap<br />

vehicle or motor vehicle parts are identified as stolen<br />

or evidence in a criminal case, a law enforcement <strong>of</strong>ficial<br />

may: (1) physically confiscate and remove the item<br />

from the scrap vehicle operator, pursuant to a written<br />

notification; (2) place the item on hold or extend<br />

the hold and leave it on the premises; or (3) direct its<br />

release to a registered owner or owner’s agent. The<br />

section also provides for a release <strong>of</strong> the hold, a process<br />

for the operator to request the seized property be<br />

returned, and a process for the operator to seek restitution<br />

against the person who delivered the item. Effective<br />

Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Video security cameras required. Section 5,<br />

subd. 13 extends existing provisions in Minn. Stat.<br />

§ 325E.21, subd. 9 requiring that scrap metal dealers<br />

must install and maintain security cameras to scrap<br />

vehicle operators. Each operator must install and<br />

maintain at each location video surveillance cameras,<br />

still digital cameras, or similar devices positioned to<br />

record or photograph a frontal view showing a clear<br />

and readily identifiable image <strong>of</strong> the face <strong>of</strong> each seller<br />

<strong>of</strong> a scrap vehicle who enters the location. The scrap<br />

vehicle operator must also photograph the seller’s<br />

vehicle, including license plate, either by video camera<br />

or still digital camera, so that an accurate and complete<br />

description <strong>of</strong> it may be obtained from the recordings<br />

made by the cameras. Photographs and recordings<br />

must be clearly and accurately associated with their<br />

respective records. The camera must be kept in operating<br />

condition, be turned on when the location is<br />

open or when a vehicle is being purchased, and must<br />

record and display the accurate date and time. Recordings<br />

and images must be retained by the scrap vehicle<br />

operator for a minimum period <strong>of</strong> 60 days and must<br />

at all reasonable times be open to the inspection <strong>of</strong><br />

any properly identified law enforcement <strong>of</strong>ficer. If the<br />

scrap vehicle operator does not purchase some or any<br />

scrap vehicles at a specific business location, the operator<br />

need not comply with this subdivision with respect<br />

to those purchases. This subdivision does not apply to<br />

the purchase <strong>of</strong> a scrap vehicle by a used vehicle parts<br />

dealer licensed under Minn. Stat. § 168.27, for dismantling<br />

the vehicle for its parts. Effective Jan. 1, 2014.<br />

• Preemption <strong>of</strong> local ordinances provided. Section<br />

5, subd. 14 provides that the provisions in this<br />

section preempt and supersede any local ordinance or<br />

rule concerning the same subject matter. Effective Aug.<br />

1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Reporting period shortened. Section 6 amends<br />

Minn. Stat. § 168A.153, subd. 1 by shortening from 30<br />

days to 10 days the time by which a dealer who buys a<br />

vehicle to be dismantled or destroyed must report the<br />

vehicle’s license plate number and identification number,<br />

and the seller’s name and driver’s license number. Effective<br />

Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Notification requirement provided. Section 7<br />

amends Minn. Stat. § 168A.153, subd. 3 by providing<br />

that the notification required under subd. 1 must be<br />

made electronically as prescribed by the registrar. Effective<br />

Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Definitions added to scrap metal dealer<br />

regulations. Section 8 amends Minn. Stat. § 325E.21,<br />

subd. 1 by adding definitions. “Interchange file<br />

<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Summaries</strong> Page 11


specification format” means the most recent version<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Minneapolis automated property system<br />

interchange file specification format. “Seller” means any<br />

seller, prospective seller, or agent <strong>of</strong> the seller. “Pro<strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> identification” means a driver’s license, <strong>Minnesota</strong><br />

identification card number, or other identification<br />

document issued for identification purposes by any state,<br />

federal, or foreign government if the document includes<br />

the person’s photograph, full name, birth date, and<br />

signature. Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Scrap metal dealer required to obtain signed<br />

statement. Section 9 amends Minn. Stat. § 325E.21,<br />

subd. 1a by requiring a statement signed by the seller,<br />

under penalty <strong>of</strong> perjury attesting that the scrap metal is<br />

not stolen and is free <strong>of</strong> any liens or encumbrances and<br />

the seller has the right to sell it. Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong> and<br />

expires Jan. 1, 2015.<br />

• Purchase or acquisition record required. Section<br />

10 adds a section to Minn. Stat. § 325E.21. It provides<br />

that every scrap metal dealer, including an agent,<br />

employee, or representative <strong>of</strong> the dealer, shall create a<br />

permanent record written in English, using an electronic<br />

record program at the time <strong>of</strong> each purchase or acquisition<br />

<strong>of</strong> scrap metal. The section outlines the information<br />

required to be kept as part <strong>of</strong> the record, which must<br />

at all reasonable times be open to the inspection <strong>of</strong> any<br />

properly identified law enforcement <strong>of</strong>ficer.<br />

• Exceptions. No record is required for property purchased<br />

from merchants, manufacturers, salvage pools,<br />

insurance companies, rental car companies, financial<br />

institutions, charities, dealers licensed under Minn.<br />

Stat. § 168.27, or wholesale dealers, having an established<br />

place <strong>of</strong> business, or <strong>of</strong> any goods purchased at<br />

open sale from any bankrupt stock, but a receipt must<br />

be obtained and kept by the person, which must be<br />

shown upon demand to any properly identified law<br />

enforcement <strong>of</strong>ficer.<br />

• Personal information protected. A dealer may not<br />

disclose personal information concerning a customer<br />

without the customer’s consent unless the disclosure<br />

is required by law or made in response to a request<br />

from a law enforcement agency. A dealer must implement<br />

reasonable safeguards to protect the security <strong>of</strong><br />

the personal information, defined as any individually<br />

identifiable information gathered in connection with a<br />

record. Effective Jan. 1, 2015.<br />

• Automated property system requirements provided.<br />

Section 11 adds a section to Minn. Stat. §<br />

325E.21. It requires dealers to completely and accurately<br />

provide all the required information by transferring it<br />

from their computer to the automated property system,<br />

by the close <strong>of</strong> business each day, using the interchange<br />

file specification format. A dealer who does not<br />

have an electronic point-<strong>of</strong>-sale program may request to<br />

be provided s<strong>of</strong>tware by the automated property system<br />

to record the required information. If the dealer uses a<br />

commercially available electronic point-<strong>of</strong>-sale program<br />

to record the information required in this section, it<br />

must submit the information using the interchange file<br />

specification format. Any record submitted by a dealer<br />

that does not conform to the interchange file specification<br />

format must be corrected and resubmitted the next<br />

business day. No fees may be charged to a dealer for use<br />

<strong>of</strong> the automated property system until such time as the<br />

Legislature enacts a fee schedule. A dealer must display<br />

a sign <strong>of</strong> sufficient size, in a conspicuous place in<br />

the premises, which informs all patrons that transactions<br />

are reported to law enforcement daily. Every local law<br />

enforcement agency must participate in the automated<br />

property system as an individual agency or in conjunction<br />

with another agency or agencies to provide the service.<br />

Effective Jan. 1, 2015.<br />

• Registration requirement sunset provided. Section<br />

12 amends Minn. Stat. § 325E.21, subd. 4, which<br />

requires every scrap metal dealer to register with and<br />

participate in the criminal alert network described in<br />

Minn. Stat. § 299A.61. It provides that the requirement<br />

sunsets on Jan. 1, 2015, when new requirements go into<br />

effect. Effective Jan. 1, 2015.<br />

• Investigative holds for scrap metal purchases<br />

modified. Section 13 amends Minn. Stat. § 325E.21,<br />

subd. 8. It authorizes an initial 72-hour hold upon notification<br />

from law enforcement that the scrap metal<br />

dealer shall not sell or remove an item. It requires the<br />

agency to confirm the hold in writing, and it then<br />

remains in effect for 30 days from date <strong>of</strong> initial notification.<br />

It provides that the agency may confiscate the<br />

stolen item or evidence and remove it, place the item<br />

on hold and leave it in the premises, or direct its release<br />

to an owner. Finally, it provides that if law enforcement<br />

does not timely issue a notification to confiscate or issues<br />

the notification but fails to remove the item within 15<br />

days, the dealer may process the item. Effective Aug. 1,<br />

<strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Video security cameras required. Section 14 amends<br />

Minn. Stat. § 325E.21, subd. 9, so that it matches the<br />

video camera requirements in for scrap vehicle operators<br />

under 168A.1501 (See, Section 5, subd. 13 above). Effective<br />

Jan. 1, 2014.<br />

• Preemption <strong>of</strong> local ordinances provided. Section<br />

15 adds a subdivision to Minn. Stat. § 325E.21. It<br />

provides that the provisions in this section preempt and<br />

supersede any local ordinance or rule concerning the<br />

same subject matter. Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Automated Property System standards required.<br />

Section 16 is a <strong>2013</strong> Session <strong>Law</strong>. It requires the Minneapolis<br />

Police Department, in consultation with law<br />

enforcement, prosecutors, the commissioner <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Page 12<br />

<strong>League</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>Cities</strong>


Department <strong>of</strong> Public Safety, legislators, and representatives<br />

from each regulated industry, to develop standards<br />

for the Automated Property System as it pertains to<br />

scrap metal. Proposed standards are to be submitted to<br />

the Legislature by Jan. 15, 2014. Final standards are to be<br />

completed by July 1, 2014, and provided to scrap metal<br />

dealers by July 15, 2014. Effective May 25, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

(AF)<br />

DATA PRACTICES<br />

Safe At Home Program<br />

Chapter 76 (HF 580*/SF 509) clarifies the duties and<br />

responsibilities related to the Safe At Home Program<br />

administered by the Secretary <strong>of</strong> State. The program, created<br />

in 2006, provides an alternative mailing address to<br />

individuals, such as victims <strong>of</strong> domestic violence, who need<br />

to keep their location private for their personal safety. The<br />

bill creates a new section <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Minnesota</strong> Government<br />

Data Practices Act (MGDPA), Minn. Stat. § 13.045, that<br />

classifies identity and location data <strong>of</strong> participants as private<br />

data. The data may not be shared with other government<br />

entities or disseminated to any person unless the participant<br />

expressly consents in writing, the sharing is mandated<br />

by court order, or is required for certain law enforcement<br />

purposes. The bill requires that a participant must inform a<br />

governmental entity in writing that he or she is a certified<br />

participant. A government entity must accept the alternative<br />

address maintained by the Secretary <strong>of</strong> State. Finally,<br />

the bill states that the program does not create any affirmative<br />

duty on a governmental entity to independently<br />

determine whether it maintains data on a program participant.<br />

Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>. (PH)<br />

Omnibus data practices bill<br />

Chapter 82 (HF 695/SF 745*) is the omnibus data practices<br />

bill. The following provisions are relevant to cities:<br />

• Citizen contact information classified as private<br />

data. Section 1 is an initiative sponsored by the<br />

<strong>League</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>Cities</strong> that classifies as private data<br />

the email addresses and phone numbers <strong>of</strong> citizens who<br />

submit their contact information to cities for “notification<br />

purposes or as part <strong>of</strong> a subscription list for an<br />

entity’s electronic periodic publications.” Notifications<br />

and electronic periodic publications include items such<br />

as snow emergency notices, newsletters, monthly crime<br />

reports, and other general information sent by cities to<br />

residents. The names <strong>of</strong> people on the lists and the content<br />

<strong>of</strong> any communications remain public data. Effective<br />

May 24, <strong>2013</strong>, and applies to data collected, maintained, or<br />

received before, on, or after that date.<br />

• Security information definition expanded. Section<br />

2 amends Minn. Stat. § 13.37, subd. 1, to expand the<br />

definition <strong>of</strong> security information. Current law makes<br />

certain contact information <strong>of</strong> volunteers participating in<br />

community crime prevention programs private data. The<br />

bill expands the definition to include email addresses,<br />

internet account information, and GPS locations. Effective<br />

Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Settlement agreements and investigative data. Section<br />

4 amends Minn. Stat. § 13.43, subd. 2 in order to<br />

clarify two provisions <strong>of</strong> law adopted in 2012. The 2012<br />

law (Chapter 280) made additional data related to settlement<br />

agreements involving certain public <strong>of</strong>ficials public<br />

data. Since passage in 2012, two settlement agreements<br />

involving public <strong>of</strong>ficials were classified as private data,<br />

and a number <strong>of</strong> legislators felt they should have been<br />

classified as public under the new law.<br />

• The 2012 law expanded the definition <strong>of</strong> public <strong>of</strong>ficial<br />

to include (1) the chief administrative <strong>of</strong>ficer <strong>of</strong><br />

all political subdivisions, (2) the three highest-paid<br />

employees in a city with a population <strong>of</strong> over 15,000,<br />

and (3) in a city with a population over 7,500, “individuals<br />

in a management capacity reporting directly to<br />

the chief administrative <strong>of</strong>ficer.” The third classification<br />

is changed, and now applies to: “managers; chiefs;<br />

heads or directors <strong>of</strong> departments, divisions, bureaus,<br />

or boards; and any equivalent position.”<br />

• The 2012 law also made public data related to a<br />

complaint or charge against a covered public <strong>of</strong>ficial<br />

if potential legal claims were released as part <strong>of</strong> a<br />

settlement agreement with another person. Section<br />

4 deletes “with another person,” and makes public a<br />

complaint involving a covered public <strong>of</strong>ficial if potential<br />

legal claims arising out <strong>of</strong> the conduct that is the<br />

subject <strong>of</strong> the complaint or charge are released as part<br />

<strong>of</strong> a settlement agreement. This change was made so<br />

that the data are public when a settlement agreement<br />

involves the subject <strong>of</strong> the complaint. Effective May 24,<br />

<strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Criminal justice data communications network.<br />

Section 29 amends Minn. Stat. § 299C.46, subd. 3. It<br />

modifies the list <strong>of</strong> permitted uses <strong>of</strong> the criminal justice<br />

data communications network and allows access<br />

by political subdivisions where authorized by state or<br />

federal law. It establishes standards that agencies must<br />

meet in order to establish secure network connections to<br />

the database, including the performance <strong>of</strong> background<br />

checks on employees who may access the database.<br />

Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Criminal history checks authorized. Sections 30-31<br />

authorizes the performance <strong>of</strong> criminal history checks, as<br />

defined in Minn. Stat. § 299C.72, on applicants for city<br />

or county employment, persons applying to volunteer<br />

in the city or county, or an individual seeking a city or<br />

county license not otherwise subject to a state or federal<br />

background check. The criminal history check under this<br />

<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Summaries</strong> Page 13


section cannot be used in place <strong>of</strong> a statutorily-mandated<br />

or authorized background check. Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Background check required for fire department<br />

applicants. Section 32 amends Minn. Stat. § 299F.035<br />

to require background checks on applicants to fire<br />

departments in <strong>Minnesota</strong>, and to allow background<br />

checks on current employees. The section also requires<br />

that the fire chief perform criminal history record<br />

checks. Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Miscellaneous background check requirements.<br />

Sections 33-35 establish background check requirements<br />

on individuals applying for an explosives license<br />

(Minn. Stat. § 299F.73), wholesale liquor license (Minn.<br />

Stat. § 340A.301), or retail liquor license (Minn. Stat. §<br />

340A.402). Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

(PH)<br />

Page 14<br />

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT<br />

Additional security for development authority loans<br />

authorized<br />

Chapter 64 (HF 368/SF 340*) amends Minn. Stat. §<br />

116J.5764, subd. 1, the statute authorizing the Department<br />

<strong>of</strong> Employment and Economic Development (DEED) to<br />

administer demolition redevelopment loans to development<br />

authorities. The law expands the acceptable means by<br />

which an authority may secure a loan to pay for demolition<br />

costs from solely a general obligation <strong>of</strong> the authority<br />

payable primarily from a dedicated revenue source to<br />

include other security subject to review and approval by<br />

DEED, such as TIF or land sale proceeds. Effective Aug. 1,<br />

<strong>2013</strong>. (PH)<br />

Jobs, economic development, housing, commerce<br />

and energy omnibus budget bill<br />

Chapter 85 (HF 729*/SF 1057) is the omnibus jobs,<br />

economic development, housing, commerce, and energy<br />

bill. It appropriates biennial funding for the Department<br />

<strong>of</strong> Employment and Economic Development (DEED),<br />

Housing Finance Agency (HFA), Department <strong>of</strong> Labor &<br />

Industry (DLI), Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Public Utilities<br />

Commission (PUC), and various boards. The provisions<br />

relating to the jobs and economic development<br />

portion <strong>of</strong> the bills <strong>of</strong> interest to cities are summarized<br />

below. (Note: See corresponding issue areas for summaries<br />

<strong>of</strong> other projects.)<br />

Article 1: Appropriations<br />

Employment and economic development<br />

• <strong>Minnesota</strong> Investment Fund (MIF). Section 3,<br />

subd. 2(a) appropriates $15 million in FY 2014 and<br />

2015 for the MIF program. MIF funds are available<br />

to local units <strong>of</strong> government to provide loans to assist<br />

expanding businesses.<br />

··<br />

Baxter Pharmaceuticals plant in Brooklyn<br />

Park. $3 million <strong>of</strong> the MIF funding is available<br />

in FY 2014 for a forgivable loan to facilitate<br />

the purchase and operation <strong>of</strong> a biopharmaceutical<br />

manufacturing facility in Brooklyn Park (Baxter<br />

Pharmaceuticals). If the project meets performance<br />

goals the initial loan will be forgiven, and an additional<br />

$2 million made available for subsequent<br />

investment. The facility is also eligible for funding<br />

through the newly-created <strong>Minnesota</strong> Job Creation<br />

Fund (see Article 3, sec. 8 below).<br />

• <strong>Minnesota</strong> Job Creation Fund. Section 3, subd.<br />

2(b) appropriates $12 million in FY 2014 and 2015<br />

for the newly created <strong>Minnesota</strong> Job Creation Fund in<br />

Minn. Stat. § 116J.8748 (see Article 3, sec. 8 below).<br />

• Contaminated site cleanup. Section 3, subds. 2(c)<br />

and (d) appropriate approximately $2 million in FY<br />

2014 and 2015 for the contaminated site clean-up and<br />

development grant program.<br />

• Business development grants. Section 3, subd. 2(e)<br />

appropriates $1.425 million in FY 2014 and 2015 for<br />

business development competitive grants.<br />

• Jobs Skills Partnership. Section 3, subd. 2(f) appropriates<br />

$4.195 million in FY 2014 and 2015 for the<br />

Jobs Skills Partnership in Minn. Stat. § 116L.01.<br />

• Redevelopment program. Section 3, subd. 2(g)<br />

appropriates $6 million in FY 2014 and 2015 for the<br />

Redevelopment program under Minn. Stat. § 116J.<br />

571. The program provides communities with grants<br />

to pay up to 50 percent <strong>of</strong> the costs or redeveloping<br />

blighted industrial, residential, or commercial sites.<br />

• Host Community Economic Development program.<br />

Section 3, subd. 2(r) appropriates $875,000 in<br />

FY 2014 and 2015 for the Host Community Economic<br />

Development program created in Minn. Stat. §<br />

116J.548 (see Article 3, sec. 3 below).<br />

• Workforce development<br />

• Section 3, subd. 3 appropriates $16.3 million in FY<br />

2014 and $14.8 million in FY 2015 for workforce<br />

development programs.<br />

• <strong>Minnesota</strong> Trade Office<br />

• Section 3, subd. 5 appropriates $2.3 million in FY<br />

2014 and $2.3 million in FY 2015 for the <strong>Minnesota</strong><br />

Trade Office operations.<br />

··<br />

STEP Grants. Of the Trade Office appropriation,<br />

$330,000 in FY 2014 and $300,000 in FY 2015<br />

are for the newly created STEP grant program (see<br />

Article 3, sec. 11 below).<br />

··<br />

<strong>Minnesota</strong> Marketing. Of the Trade Office appropriation,<br />

$180,000 in FY 2014 and 2015 are for the<br />

newly created <strong>Minnesota</strong> Marketing Initiative (see<br />

Article 3, sec. 12 below).<br />

··<br />

Trade Policy Advisory Group. Of the Trade<br />

Office appropriation, $50,000 in FY 2014 and 2015<br />

<strong>League</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>Cities</strong>


are for the newly created Trade Policy Advisory<br />

Group (see Article 3, sec. 9 below).<br />

• Competitive grant limitation<br />

• Section 8 (technical corrections bill, <strong>Law</strong>s <strong>2013</strong>, Ch.<br />

144, Sec. 3) states that no entity receiving a direct<br />

appropriation under Article 3, may apply for a competitive<br />

grant under this section during the fiscal years<br />

in which the direct appropriations are received.<br />

Appropriations are effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

Article 2: Department <strong>of</strong> Labor & Industry (DLI) policy<br />

provisions<br />

• Misrepresentation subject to compliance order.<br />

Section 2 amends Minn. Stat. § 177.27, subd. 4 by<br />

adding the statute prohibiting the misrepresentation <strong>of</strong><br />

employment relationship (i.e., independent contractor vs.<br />

employee) to the list <strong>of</strong> laws for which DLI may issue a<br />

compliance order. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Violation <strong>of</strong> consent orders. Section 5 amends<br />

Minn. Stat. § 326B.081, subd. 3 to allow the commissioner<br />

to deny, suspend, limit, or place conditions on a<br />

permit or license if the licensee has violated a consent<br />

order or final order <strong>of</strong> the commissioner.<br />

Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Payment <strong>of</strong> examination fees. Section 6 amends<br />

Minn. Stat. § 326B.093, subd. 4 and extends the time<br />

that an applicant for a license has to pay the license fee<br />

from 90 to 180 days after notification <strong>of</strong> passing the<br />

examination. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Scope <strong>of</strong> State Building Code. Sections 7 & 9 amend<br />

Minn. Stat. §§ 326B.101 and 326B.121 to clarify that<br />

the State Building Code governs the use <strong>of</strong> buildings, in<br />

addition to their construction, reconstruction, alteration,<br />

and repair. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Definition <strong>of</strong> “public building.” Section 8 amends<br />

Minn. Stat. § 326B.103, subd. 1 to include a charter<br />

school building project in excess <strong>of</strong> $100,000 in the definition<br />

<strong>of</strong> a public building. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Elevator constructor license created. Sections 10-30<br />

establish the requirements for the licensing and registration<br />

<strong>of</strong> elevator constructors and contractors. Effective<br />

July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Specification review agreements with municipalities.<br />

Section 32 amends Minn. Stat. § 326B.43, subd. 2<br />

to update statutory cross references defining which public<br />

buildings require state review <strong>of</strong> plumbing plans and<br />

specifications. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Accelerated plan review eliminated. Section 33<br />

deletes a clause from Minn. Stat. § 326B.49, subd. 2 that<br />

provides for an accelerated plumbing plan review at<br />

twice the regular fee. Effective Jan. 1, 2014.<br />

• Plumbing fees restructured. Section 34 restructures<br />

the plumbing review fees in Minn. Stat. § 326B.49, subd.<br />

3. Effective Jan. 1, 2014.<br />

• Contractor Recovery Fund. Section 35 amends<br />

Minn. Stat. § 326B.89, subd. 1, and restricts the definition<br />

<strong>of</strong> owner for purposes <strong>of</strong> the Contractor Recovery<br />

Fund to exclude an owner who intends to use<br />

the property for a business purpose and not as owneroccupied<br />

real estate. An excluded owner would not be<br />

eligible to receive compensation from the fund. Effective<br />

July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Manufactured home dealer license changes. Section<br />

36 amends Minn. Stat. § 327B.04, subd. 4 and<br />

exempts certain owners <strong>of</strong> manufactured home parks<br />

from meeting the two-year prior experience requirement<br />

necessary for obtaining a dealer license. Effective<br />

July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

Article 3: Department <strong>of</strong> Employment and Economic<br />

Development (DEED) policy provisions<br />

• Cost <strong>of</strong> living study. Section 1 adds a new statute,<br />

Minn. Stat. § 116J.013, which requires DEED to conduct<br />

an annual cost <strong>of</strong> living study in <strong>Minnesota</strong>. The<br />

study must include an analysis <strong>of</strong> statewide and county<br />

cost-<strong>of</strong>-living data, employment data, and job vacancy<br />

data. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Labor market data. Section 2 adds a new statute,<br />

Minn. Stat. § 116J.4011, which requires DEED, in consultation<br />

with the Office <strong>of</strong> Higher Education and local<br />

workforce councils, to produce and publish a labor market<br />

analysis describing the alignment between employer<br />

requirements and workforce qualifications. The information<br />

must be easily accessible and readable, and<br />

prominently presented on the websites <strong>of</strong> DEED and<br />

workforce centers. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Host community economic development grants.<br />

Section 3 creates a new program in Minn. Stat. §<br />

116J.548 that will provide grants for the acquisition and<br />

betterment <strong>of</strong> public owned capital improvements to<br />

communities in the seven-county metro area that host<br />

waste disposal facilities. There is no local match required.<br />

Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Small cities development block grant changes.<br />

Section 4 modifies Minn. Stat. § 116J.8731, subd. 2 to<br />

allow DEED to provide a forgivable loan from the Small<br />

<strong>Cities</strong> Development Block Grant Program directly to a<br />

private enterprise without requiring an application from<br />

the local community, other than a resolution <strong>of</strong> support.<br />

Eligible applicants include development authorities, provided<br />

they have municipal approval. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• <strong>Minnesota</strong> Investment Fund loans authorized.<br />

Section 5 amends Minn. Stat. § 116J.8731, subd. 3 and<br />

authorizes the <strong>Minnesota</strong> Investment Fund (MIF) to<br />

fund loans (in addition to grants) for infrastructure. Effective<br />

July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• <strong>Minnesota</strong> Job Creation Fund. Section 8 creates<br />

the <strong>Minnesota</strong> Job Creation Fund, an initiative <strong>of</strong> Gov.<br />

<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Summaries</strong> Page 15


Dayton designed to replace the expiring JOB-Z program.<br />

Unlike JOB-Z, the Job Creation Fund is available<br />

statewide. The fund will provide up to $1 million<br />

to businesses that meet job creation and private investment<br />

requirements. To qualify, a business must create at<br />

least 10 jobs and make $500,000 in private investment.<br />

A qualifying business must be engaged in manufacturing,<br />

warehousing, distribution, information technology,<br />

finance, insurance, or pr<strong>of</strong>essional/technical services.<br />

“Pr<strong>of</strong>essional services” does not include work performed<br />

primarily by attorneys, accountants, business consultants,<br />

physicians, or health care consultants.<br />

Local government approval required. In order to<br />

qualify, a business must submit an application to the local<br />

government where the facility will be located, and the<br />

local government must submit the application and other<br />

required materials to DEED. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Trade Policy Advisory Council established. Section<br />

9 creates a new 15-member trade policy advisory council<br />

to advise the governor and Legislature regarding U.S.<br />

trade agreements. The council will consist <strong>of</strong> two senators;<br />

two representatives; the commissioners <strong>of</strong> DEED,<br />

Agriculture, and Administration; and eight persons<br />

appointed by the governor. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• <strong>Minnesota</strong> trade <strong>of</strong>fices established. Section 10<br />

creates a new statute, Minn. Stat. § 116J.978, directing<br />

DEED to establish three trade <strong>of</strong>fices in foreign markets<br />

selected for their potential to increase <strong>Minnesota</strong> exports<br />

and attract foreign investment. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• STEP Grants created. Section 11 creates a new statute,<br />

Minn. Stat. § 116J.979, directing DEED to establish<br />

a new STEP (State Trade and Export Promotion) grant<br />

program to provide assistance to <strong>Minnesota</strong> companies<br />

with an interest in exporting products or services to foreign<br />

markets. The maximum grant is $7,500. Effective July<br />

1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Invest <strong>Minnesota</strong> marketing initiative. Section 12<br />

creates a new statute, Minn. Stat. § 116J.9801, directing<br />

DEED to establish an initiative to brand the state’s economic<br />

development initiatives and promote <strong>Minnesota</strong><br />

business opportunities. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Dakota County CDA granted MIF authority. Section<br />

22 creates a new statute, Minn. Stat. § 383D.412,<br />

granting the Dakota County Community Development<br />

Agency the authority to apply for and receive state<br />

money from the <strong>Minnesota</strong> Investment Fund. Currently,<br />

only general purpose local governments are eligible<br />

recipients. The Dakota County Board must pass a resolution<br />

approving such treatment, and the members <strong>of</strong> the<br />

County Board must be the same as the members <strong>of</strong> the<br />

CDA. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

Page 16<br />

Article 5: Miscellaneous provisions<br />

• Use <strong>of</strong> paper made in <strong>Minnesota</strong>. Section 1 amends<br />

Minn. Stat. § 16B.122 to require public entities, including<br />

cities, to purchase paper which has been made on a<br />

paper machine located in <strong>Minnesota</strong>, whenever practicable.<br />

This is in addition to existing requirements related to<br />

the purchase and use <strong>of</strong> paper by public entities. Effective<br />

July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Municipal regulation <strong>of</strong> barber shops. Section 17<br />

clarifies Minn. Stat. § 154.26. Current law states that a<br />

municipality may regulate the operating hours <strong>of</strong> a barber<br />

shop within its municipal limits, and the new language<br />

clarifies that this power is in addition to all other<br />

applicable local regulations. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Office <strong>of</strong> Collaboration and Dispute Resolution<br />

created. Sections 31 & 32 create an Office <strong>of</strong> Collaboration<br />

and Dispute Resolution within the Bureau <strong>of</strong><br />

Mediation Services to promote the use <strong>of</strong> community<br />

mediation and to assist state agencies and local governments<br />

to improve collaboration and dispute resolution.<br />

The Bureau is authorized to issue grants to nonpr<strong>of</strong>it<br />

community mediation entities that assist in resolution <strong>of</strong><br />

disputes. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

(PH)<br />

ELECTIONS<br />

Omnibus elections policy bill<br />

Chapter 131 (HF 894*/SF 677) is the omnibus elections<br />

bill. Some <strong>of</strong> the most notable changes to elections administration<br />

include: permitting no excuse absentee voting;<br />

reducing the number <strong>of</strong> voters who can be vouched for<br />

from 15 to eight; reducing the number <strong>of</strong> elections judges<br />

from four to three except in statewide elections; establishing<br />

pilot sites for the use <strong>of</strong> electronic rosters and a task<br />

force; and specifying the conditions under which a vacancy<br />

in nomination exists for a partisan and non-partisan <strong>of</strong>fice.<br />

Article 1: Absentee voting modifications<br />

• No excuse absentee voting. Section 2 amends Minn.<br />

Stat. § 203B.02, subd. 1 establishing no excuse absentee<br />

voting. Sections 3 and 4 amend Minn. Stat. § 203B.04 to<br />

make conforming changes.<br />

• Processing absentee ballots seven days before<br />

Election Day. Section 8 amends Minn. Stat. §<br />

203B.121, to increase the time to process absentee ballots<br />

from four days prior to Election Day to seven. Sections 6<br />

and 7 amend Minn. Stat. § 203B.121 making conforming<br />

changes.<br />

Effective Jan. 1, 2014, and applies to voting at elections conducted<br />

on the date <strong>of</strong> the state primary in 2014 and thereafter.<br />

Article 2: Elections administration including redistricting,<br />

vouching and public funded recounts<br />

Several sections eliminate obsolete reference in law that<br />

assign and title ballots in a particular color, based on the<br />

<strong>League</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>Cities</strong>


<strong>of</strong>fices or questions to be presented on the ballot. Modifications<br />

for ballot questions are made in several sections.<br />

• Sections 1 and 2 modify the boundaries <strong>of</strong> senate districts<br />

39 (Stillwater City/Stillwater Township) and 49<br />

(Edina) and their house districts (39A and B/49A and B,<br />

respectively) to correct redistricting errors as ordered by<br />

a Special Redistricting Panel on Feb. 21, 2012. Effective<br />

for the state primary and state general elections conducted in<br />

2014 for terms <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice beginning on the first Monday in January<br />

2015, and for all elections held thereafter.<br />

• Section 7 amends Minn. Stat. § 201.061, subd. 3 to<br />

reduce the number <strong>of</strong> persons a voter may vouch <strong>of</strong> in<br />

the polling place on election day from 15 to eight. An<br />

existing exemption from this limitation for employees <strong>of</strong><br />

defined residential facilities is unchanged.<br />

• Section 9 amends Minn. Stat. § 201.091, subd. 8 to eliminate<br />

the requirement <strong>of</strong> at least one telecommunications<br />

device for the deaf for voter registration information in<br />

every city <strong>of</strong> the first, second and third class.<br />

• Section 14 amends Minn. Stat. § 203B.05, subd. 1 to<br />

require that the municipal clerk who has been designated<br />

to administer absentee ballots must also be responsible<br />

for the administration <strong>of</strong> a ballot board as provided<br />

in section 203B.121. A clerk <strong>of</strong> a city that is located in<br />

more than one county may only administer absentee<br />

ballots and the absentee ballot board if the clerk has been<br />

designated by each <strong>of</strong> the county auditors or provided<br />

notice to them that the city will administer absentee<br />

voting.<br />

• Section 15 amends Minn. Stat. § 203B.08, subd. 3<br />

instructing that absentee ballots received on Election Day<br />

either after 3 p.m. or after the last mail delivery be marked<br />

as received late and not delivered to the ballot board.<br />

• Section 17 amends Minn. Stat. § 203B.121, subd. 1 to<br />

allow ballot boards to include deputy city clerks who<br />

have received training in the processing and counting <strong>of</strong><br />

absentee ballots.<br />

• Section 21 amends Minn. Stat. § 203B.04 by creating a<br />

fourth subdivision prohibiting a candidate who files an<br />

affidavit <strong>of</strong> candidacy for one <strong>of</strong>fice to subsequently file<br />

another affidavit <strong>of</strong> candidacy for a different <strong>of</strong>fice to be<br />

elected at the same general election, unless the candidate<br />

withdraws the first affidavit <strong>of</strong> candidacy.<br />

• Section 23 amends Minn. Stat. § 204B.22, subd. 1 reducing<br />

the required number <strong>of</strong> elections judges from four<br />

to three in a precinct for elections other than the state<br />

a general election except for precincts with fewer than<br />

500 registered voters. Those precincts may use the minimum<br />

number <strong>of</strong> three elections judges for the state general<br />

election.<br />

• Section 33 amends Minn. Stat. § 204C.15, subd. 1 eliminates<br />

an allowance for election judges to select two individuals<br />

<strong>of</strong> different major political parties to assist a voter<br />

in marking the voter’s ballot. A voter may select a person<br />

to assist.<br />

• Section 39 amends Minn. Stat. § 204C.36, subd. 1<br />

modifies the vote different thresholds for publicly<br />

funded recounts at the expense <strong>of</strong> the city. If there are<br />

50,000 or more votes cast, a recount may be requests if<br />

the difference between the apparent winner and loser is<br />

0.25 percent. If the number <strong>of</strong> votes cast is more than<br />

400, but less than 50,000, the difference must be less<br />

than 0.5 percent.<br />

• Section 52 amends Minn. Stat. § 204D.19, subd. 2 prohibiting<br />

a special election when the Legislature is in<br />

session , when the Legislature will be in session for the<br />

elected person to be seated, from occurring during the<br />

four days before or after a state holiday as defined in<br />

Minn. Stat. § 645.44, subd. 5.<br />

• Section 54 amends Minn. Stat. § 205.10, subd. 3 amends<br />

the time period in which cities may conduct a special<br />

election prohibiting cities from holding a special election<br />

as defined in subd. 1 from 40 to 56 days after the state<br />

general election.<br />

• Section 55 amends Minn. Stat. § 205.13, subd. 1a adding<br />

the requirement that municipal clerks’ <strong>of</strong>fices accept<br />

candidate filings from 1 p.m. to 5 p.m. on the last day <strong>of</strong><br />

the filing period for municipal <strong>of</strong>fices.<br />

• Section 56 amends Minn. Stat. § 205.16, subd. 4 increasing<br />

the number <strong>of</strong> days before a municipal election that<br />

the municipal clerk must provide notice <strong>of</strong> the election<br />

to the county auditor from 67 to 74 days. Section 57<br />

amends Minn. Stat. § 205.16, subd. 5 for notice to the<br />

Secretary <strong>of</strong> State.<br />

• Sections 58 and 59 amend Minn. Stat. § 205.13 to standardize<br />

ballot formatting requirements across all cities<br />

and towns for municipal primary elections.<br />

• Section 67 amends Minn. Stat. § 206.57, adding subdivision<br />

8 exempting precincts using a precinct count voting<br />

system from a requirement that ballot boxes contain two<br />

separate compartments. The requirement is currently<br />

contained in administrative rule 8230.4355. Effective May<br />

24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Section 69 Minn. Stat. § 206.89, subd. 2 requiring that<br />

the postelection review must not begin before the 11 th<br />

day after the state general election and must be completed<br />

no later than the 18 th day after the state general<br />

election. This section also allows for the counting <strong>of</strong><br />

absentee ballots with all other ballots from the individual<br />

precinct if the precinct is selected for review.<br />

• Section 70 amends Minn. Stat. § 206.89 adding a new<br />

subdivision providing that a postelection review is not<br />

required for an <strong>of</strong>fice that may be subject to a publicly<br />

funded recount.<br />

• Section 71 amends Minn. Stat. § 206.90, subd. 6 modifying<br />

standards for titling ballots in precincts using an optical<br />

scan voting system. In state elections, a single ballot<br />

title must be used, as provided in sections 204D.08, subdivision<br />

6, and 204D.11, subdivision 1. In odd-numbered<br />

<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Summaries</strong> Page 17


years when both municipal and school district <strong>of</strong>fices or<br />

questions appear on the ballot, the single ballot title “City<br />

(or Town) and School District Ballot” must be used.<br />

• Section 78 amends Minn. Stat. § 340A.62 to standardize<br />

the form <strong>of</strong> a referendum ballot question related to the<br />

operation <strong>of</strong> a municipal liquor store to “Shall the city <strong>of</strong><br />

(name) discontinue operating the municipal liquor store<br />

on (Month xx, 2xxx)?”<br />

• Section 84 appropriates $60,000 to the Office <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Secretary <strong>of</strong> State to develop functionality within the<br />

statewide voter registration system to facilitate the processing<br />

and tracking <strong>of</strong> mail ballots.<br />

Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong> unless otherwise noted.<br />

Article 3: Loss and restoration <strong>of</strong> voting rights<br />

This article streamlines data sharing <strong>of</strong> those convicted <strong>of</strong> a<br />

felony whose voting rights have not been restored between<br />

the Department <strong>of</strong> Corrections and the Office <strong>of</strong> the Secretary<br />

<strong>of</strong> State. Of most relevance to cities is section 4,<br />

subd. 3, which amends Minn. Stat. § 203B.06, subd. 3. If a<br />

municipal clerk receives application for an absentee ballot<br />

with an address <strong>of</strong> an adult correctional facility, they must<br />

promptly transmit a copy <strong>of</strong> the application to the county<br />

attorney for investigation. Effective June 15, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

Article 4: Electronic rosters<br />

This language is <strong>2013</strong> session law and establishes electronic<br />

roster pilot sites and a task force.<br />

• Electronic roster pilot project. The jurisdictions<br />

that may participate as pilot sites for the <strong>2013</strong> municipal<br />

elections are Dilworth, Minnetonka, Moorhead, Saint<br />

Anthony, and Saint Paul. Each city that chooses to participate<br />

will identify certain precincts that will use the<br />

rosters for election day registration, and then upload the<br />

data to the statewide voter registration system (SVRS).<br />

• Electronic roster task force. The task force will consist<br />

<strong>of</strong> 15 members and research various issues related to<br />

the use <strong>of</strong> the rosters, including the ability to use photographs<br />

within the rosters. The <strong>League</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong><br />

<strong>Cities</strong> will appoint one member to the task force and<br />

the first meeting will be convened by July 1, <strong>2013</strong> by the<br />

Office <strong>of</strong> the Secretary <strong>of</strong> State. A report summarizing<br />

the group’s findings on the data security, reliability, and<br />

transferability to the SVRS must be completed and submitted<br />

to the appropriate legislative committees by Jan.<br />

31, 2014.<br />

Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

Article 5: Vacancies in nomination<br />

This article modifies existing language regarding death or<br />

withdrawal for partisan <strong>of</strong>fices and establishes a new section<br />

<strong>of</strong> law for vacancies in nomination for non-partisan<br />

<strong>of</strong>fice.<br />

• Vacancy in nomination for partisan <strong>of</strong>fice. Sections<br />

1-7 amend Minn. Stat. § 204B.13 establishing the<br />

conditions under which a vacancy in nomination exists<br />

for a partisan <strong>of</strong>fice. A vacancy exists when a candidate:<br />

dies; withdraws during the withdrawal period <strong>of</strong> two<br />

days after the filing period for the <strong>of</strong>fice closes; or withdraws<br />

by filing an affidavit <strong>of</strong> withdrawal, at least one day<br />

prior to the general election, due to a catastrophic illness<br />

that will permanently and continuously incapacitate<br />

and prevent the candidate from performing the duties <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>of</strong>fice sought. An affidavit under this clause must be<br />

accompanied by a certificate verifying the illness, signed<br />

by at least two licensed physicians. If the vacancy in<br />

nomination occurs 79 or more days before the general<br />

election (the 79 th day prior to a general election falls in<br />

mid-late August), the candidate’s political party may file a<br />

certificate nominating a new candidate, no later than 71<br />

days before the general election, and that newly-named<br />

candidate must appear on the general election ballot. The<br />

party is permitted to provide its own internal rules for<br />

selecting a new nominee. If the vacancy in nomination<br />

occurs within 79 days <strong>of</strong> the general election, the general<br />

election ballot would remain unchanged (the name<br />

<strong>of</strong> the candidate that died or withdrew would remain<br />

on the ballot), but the results <strong>of</strong> that election would not<br />

be counted. Instead, the <strong>of</strong>fice would move to a special<br />

election. If a special election is required, all other candidates<br />

appearing on the ballot for that <strong>of</strong>fice automatically<br />

are forwarded to the special election ballot; no new<br />

candidate filings are permitted. The major political party<br />

<strong>of</strong> the candidate that died or withdrew would be permitted<br />

to nominate a new candidate, no later than seven<br />

days after the general election. Voters voting in a polling<br />

place on the date <strong>of</strong> the general election must be notified<br />

<strong>of</strong> the procedure for conducting the special election<br />

for the affected <strong>of</strong>fice.<br />

• Vacancy in nomination for non-partisan <strong>of</strong>fice.<br />

Sections 8-11 recodify existing law into Minn. Stat. §<br />

204B.13 related to vacancies in nomination when a<br />

candidate formally withdraws and adds a new provision<br />

providing that a vacancy in nomination also exists if<br />

a candidate for a non-partisan <strong>of</strong>fice—except a judicial<br />

<strong>of</strong>fice—for which only one or two candidates filed or<br />

who was nominated at a primary dies more than 79 days<br />

prior to the date <strong>of</strong> the general election. If a vacancy in<br />

nomination occurs under one <strong>of</strong> the situations specified<br />

in this section, the candidate filing period for the <strong>of</strong>fice<br />

would be re-opened, allowing new candidates to file for<br />

the <strong>of</strong>fice. In the event <strong>of</strong> a death <strong>of</strong> a non-partisan candidate<br />

79 or fewer days prior to the date <strong>of</strong> the election,<br />

or the death <strong>of</strong> a judicial candidate regardless <strong>of</strong> the date<br />

<strong>of</strong> death, the deceased candidate’s name would continue<br />

to appear on the ballot. If the deceased candidate is<br />

elected, the <strong>of</strong>fice would be declared vacant at the start<br />

Page 18<br />

<strong>League</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>Cities</strong>


<strong>of</strong> the new term and filled following procedures contained<br />

in existing law.<br />

Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>, and applies to vacancies in nomination<br />

on or after that date. (AL)<br />

EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES<br />

Emergency medical responders requirements modified<br />

Chapter 13 (HF 201/SF 166*) modifies provisions to<br />

include advanced emergency medical technicians (AEMT)<br />

in the staffing requirements for advanced life support<br />

responses. It also updates inspections provisions and provides<br />

requirements for emergency medical responder registration.<br />

• Advanced life support staffing requirements modified.<br />

Section 1 amends Minn. Stat. § 144E.101, subd.<br />

7, to include “advanced emergency medical technician”<br />

(AEMT) in the requirements for minimum staffing for<br />

an advanced life-support ambulance.<br />

• Inspections <strong>of</strong> electronic files authorized. Section 2<br />

amends Minn. Stat. § 144E.18 to specify that the Emergency<br />

Medical Services Regulatory Board (EMSRB)<br />

may review electronic files when inspecting ambulance<br />

services.<br />

• Education programs conforming changes provided.<br />

Section 3 amends Minn. Stat. § 144E.27, subd. 1,<br />

to make conforming changes with section 4 below.<br />

• Education programs approval required. Section 4<br />

amends Minn. Stat. § 144E.27, by adding a subdivision.<br />

It requires that all education programs for emergency<br />

medical responders must be approved by the EMSRB.<br />

The section also sets out criteria for board approval.<br />

• AEMT and paramedic requirements specified.<br />

Section 5 amends Minn. Stat. § 144E.285, subd. 2. It<br />

adds AEMT to provisions related to education requirements<br />

for paramedics.<br />

• Reapproval programs requirements modified. Section<br />

6 amends Minn. Stat. § 144E.285, subd. 4. It modifies<br />

reapproval requirements for education programs for<br />

EMTs, AEMTs and paramedics by adding that for reapproval,<br />

programs must maintain the minimum average<br />

yearly pass rate set by the EMSRB.<br />

Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>. (AF)<br />

Continuing education requirements for community<br />

paramedics modified<br />

Chapter 18 (HF 75*/SF 39) amends Minn. Stat. §<br />

144E.28, subd. 9. It requires that, in addition to existing<br />

paramedic continuing education requirements, an individual<br />

certified as a community paramedic must complete 12<br />

hours <strong>of</strong> continuing education in clinical topics approved<br />

by the ambulance service medical director. Effective Aug. 1,<br />

<strong>2013</strong>. (AF)<br />

EMPLOYMENT<br />

Workers’ Compensation Reinsurance Association<br />

requirements modified<br />

Chapter 15 (HF 504*/SF 372) amends Minn. Stat. § 79.35,<br />

which relates to the Workers’ Compensation Reinsurance<br />

Association (WCRA), a nonpr<strong>of</strong>it reinsurance pool<br />

to which state law requires workers’ compensation insurance<br />

companies, and employers that self-insure for workers’<br />

compensation, to be members. The chapter eliminates one<br />

component <strong>of</strong> the premium required for the reinsurance<br />

coverage, namely the cost <strong>of</strong> the claims that exceed the<br />

prefunded limit. It also eliminates from the law any references<br />

to the prefunded limit. Effective Jan. 1, 2015. (AF)<br />

Prompt payment <strong>of</strong> wages modified<br />

Chapter 27 (HF 748*/SF 602) amends two sections <strong>of</strong> law<br />

relating to payment <strong>of</strong> wages upon discharge and payment<br />

<strong>of</strong> wages upon quitting or resignation. Similar changes are<br />

made to each section <strong>of</strong> law.<br />

• Penalty for failure to make payment <strong>of</strong> wages<br />

promptly modified. Section 1 amends Minn. Stat.<br />

§ 181.13, a law regulating an employer’s payment <strong>of</strong><br />

wages upon the discharge <strong>of</strong> an employee. It requires<br />

the payment <strong>of</strong> wages at a rate in excess <strong>of</strong> the regular<br />

rate if the higher rate is set by law, regulation, rule,<br />

ordinance, government resolution or policy, contract,<br />

or other legal authority. An employee may recover an<br />

additional amount equal to the unpaid wages as compensatory<br />

damages. An employee’s demand for payment<br />

under this section must be in writing, but need not state<br />

the precise amount <strong>of</strong> unpaid wages or commissions. An<br />

employee may directly seek and recover payment from<br />

an employer under this section even if the employee is<br />

not a party to a contract that requires the employer to<br />

pay the employee at the rate <strong>of</strong> pay demanded by the<br />

employee, so long as the contract or any applicable statute,<br />

regulation, rule, ordinance, government resolution,<br />

or policy, or other legal authority requires payment to<br />

the employee at the particular rate <strong>of</strong> pay. The employee<br />

shall be able to directly seek payment at the highest rate<br />

<strong>of</strong> pay provided in the contract or applicable law, and any<br />

other related remedies as provided in the section.<br />

• Prompt payment to employees who quit or resign<br />

modified. Section 2 amends Minn. Stat. § 181.14,<br />

a law relating to payment to employees who quit or<br />

resign. It provides that wages are earned and unpaid if<br />

the employee was not paid for all time worked at the<br />

regular rate <strong>of</strong> pay or the rate required by law, regulation,<br />

rule, ordinance, resolution, policy, contract, or<br />

other legal authority, whichever is greater. An employee’s<br />

demand for payment under this section must be in<br />

writing but need not state the precise amount <strong>of</strong> unpaid<br />

<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Summaries</strong> Page 19


wages or commissions. An employee may directly seek<br />

and recover payment from an employer under this section<br />

even if the employee is not a party to a contract that<br />

requires the employer to pay the employee at the rate <strong>of</strong><br />

pay demanded by the employee, so long as the contract<br />

or any applicable statute, regulation, rule, ordinance, government<br />

resolution or policy, or other legal authority<br />

requires payment to the employee at the particular rate<br />

<strong>of</strong> pay. The employee shall be able to directly seek payment<br />

at the highest rate <strong>of</strong> pay provided in the contract<br />

or applicable law, and any other remedies related thereto<br />

as provided in this section.<br />

• Prompt payment requirement waived under certain<br />

circumstances. Section 2 also removes language<br />

eliminating coverage <strong>of</strong> the law to any employee after a<br />

quit or discharge, who, upon audit, is found to have not<br />

properly accounted for or paid to the employer funds or<br />

property for which they were responsible. It prohibits<br />

any deductions from wages due or earned unless specifically<br />

authorized.<br />

Effective April 30, <strong>2013</strong>. (AF)<br />

Limits on reliance on criminal history for employment<br />

purposes expanded<br />

Chapter 61 (HF 690/SF 523*) amends the “Ban the<br />

Box” law. It clarifies the existing law that applies to public<br />

employers, and expands the limits on reliance on criminal<br />

history to include private employers. It also applies criminal<br />

<strong>of</strong>fender rehabilitation requirements to private employers.<br />

• Conditions precident to employment not<br />

required. Section 1 amends Minn. Stat. § 181.53 by<br />

clarifying that nothing in this section precludes an<br />

employer from requesting or considering an applicant’s<br />

criminal history pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 364.021,<br />

which exempts the Department <strong>of</strong> Corrections and<br />

other public employers that have a statutory duty to<br />

conduct a criminal history background check or otherwise<br />

take into consideration a potential employee’s<br />

criminal history during the hiring process or other<br />

applicable law.<br />

• Limitation on admissibility <strong>of</strong> criminal history<br />

provided. Section 2 amends Minn. Stat. § 181.981,<br />

subd. 1, by providing that information regarding a criminal<br />

history record <strong>of</strong> an employee or former employee<br />

may not be introduced as evidence in a civil action<br />

against a private employer or its employees or agents<br />

that is based on the conduct <strong>of</strong> the employee or former<br />

employee, if the action is based solely upon the employer’s<br />

compliance with section 364.021, which exempts the<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Corrections and other public employers<br />

who have a statutory duty to conduct a criminal history<br />

background check or otherwise take into consideration<br />

a potential employee’s criminal history during the hiring<br />

process or other applicable law.<br />

Page 20<br />

• Private employers added to “Ban the Box” law.<br />

Section 3 amends Minn. Stat. § 364.021 by adding private<br />

employers to those who cannot inquire into or<br />

consider the criminal history <strong>of</strong> a job applicant until the<br />

applicant has been selected for an interview. Existing law<br />

currently applies only to public employers.<br />

• Private employers investigation and remedies<br />

provided. Section 4 adds a subdivision to Minn. Stat.<br />

§ 364.06. It provides for investigation and the imposition<br />

<strong>of</strong> fines by the commissioner <strong>of</strong> the Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Human Rights for private sector violations <strong>of</strong> the “Ban<br />

the Box” law.<br />

• Exception provided. Section 5 amends Minn. Stat. §<br />

364.09. It states that the law does not supersede other<br />

statutorily-required criminal history background checks<br />

or records required for particular employment.<br />

• Violation <strong>of</strong> civil rights clarified to include public<br />

employer violations. Section 6 amends Minn.<br />

Stat. § 364.10 by clarifying that a violation <strong>of</strong> the rights<br />

established in Minn. Stat. § 364.01 to 364.10 by a public<br />

employer constitutes a violation <strong>of</strong> a person’s civil rights.<br />

Effective Jan, 1, 2014. (AF)<br />

Workers’ compensation modifications provided<br />

Chapter 70 (HF 1359/SF 1234*) makes policy and housekeeping<br />

changes made to worker’s compensation, adopts<br />

recommendations <strong>of</strong> the Workers’ Compensation Advisory<br />

Council and requires a report.<br />

Article 1: Dept. <strong>of</strong> Labor and Industry (DLI) provisions<br />

modified<br />

Article 1 contains provisions pertaining to DLI.<br />

• Complaint investigation requirement modified.<br />

Section 1 amends Minn. Stat. § 176.102, subd. 3a, by<br />

giving the commissioner <strong>of</strong> DLI the discretion over<br />

whether to investigate a complaint filed against a qualified<br />

rehabilitation consultant (QRC) or rehabilitation<br />

vendor. Existing law provides that the commissioner<br />

must investigate. Effective May 17, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• $7,500 cap pertaining to administrative conferences<br />

modified. Section 2 amends Minn. Stat §<br />

176.106, subd. 1. Currently, DLI may hold administrative<br />

conferences and issue decisions involving medical disputes<br />

where the amount involved is $7,500 or less. This<br />

section removes the $7,500 cap when the issue being<br />

disputed is whether the provider’s charge for a service or<br />

product is excessive. Effective May 17, <strong>2013</strong>, and applies to<br />

medical disputes filed on or after that date.<br />

• Special compensation fund reports modified. Section<br />

3 amends Minn. Stat. § 176.129, subd. 13. It clarifies<br />

that an insolvent insurer is not entitled to reimbursement<br />

<strong>of</strong> supplementary or second injury benefits from the<br />

special compensation fund, except for those who filed<br />

for reimbursement prior to June 1, <strong>2013</strong>. Effective May<br />

<strong>League</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>Cities</strong>


17, <strong>2013</strong>, and applies to claims for reimbursement filed with<br />

the special compensation fund on or after that date.<br />

• Workers’ compensation medical data use for<br />

genetic information prohibited. Section 4 amends<br />

Minn. Stat. § 176.138. It provides that medical data<br />

collected, stored, used, or disseminated by or filed<br />

with the DLI in connection with a claim for workers’<br />

compensation benefits does not constitute genetic<br />

information for the purposes <strong>of</strong> Minn. Stat. § 13.386.<br />

Effective May 17, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Notice by DLI, rights <strong>of</strong> parties modified. Section<br />

5 amends Minn. Stat. § 176.183, subd. 4. It requires the<br />

special compensation fund to provide notice to employers<br />

<strong>of</strong> a proposed settlement together with a copy <strong>of</strong> the<br />

settlement agreement. The notice must state that if the<br />

employer does not object to the settlement within 15<br />

days, it will be deemed to have waived any defenses it<br />

may have to a subsequent claim for reimbursement by<br />

the fund. Effective May 17, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Receipts for payment <strong>of</strong> compensation and filing<br />

modified. Section 6 amends Minn. Stat. § 176.245. It<br />

allows DLI to use any type <strong>of</strong> sampling methodology to<br />

perform the evaluation <strong>of</strong> whether insurers and employers<br />

are providing the department evidence <strong>of</strong> payment <strong>of</strong><br />

compensation. Current law requires the department to<br />

use Six Sigma methodology. Effective May 17, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Settlement <strong>of</strong> claims provision modified. Section 7<br />

amends Minn. Stat. § 176.521. It provides that if a workers’<br />

compensation case is settled at the time it is pending<br />

before the Workers’ Compensation Court <strong>of</strong> Appeals, the<br />

proposed settlement must be approved by an administrative<br />

law judge (rather than the Workers’ Compensation<br />

Court <strong>of</strong> Appeals). Effective for settlement agreements submitted<br />

for approval on or after July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

Article 2: Workers’ Compensation Advisory Council<br />

(WCAC) recommendations adopted<br />

Article 2 contains provisions recommended by the WCAC.<br />

• Definition <strong>of</strong> “occupational disease” expanded<br />

to include mental impairments. Section 1 amends<br />

Minn. Stat. § 176.011, subd. 15. It modifies the definition<br />

<strong>of</strong> “occupational disease” to mean mental impairments<br />

or physical diseases arising out <strong>of</strong> and in the<br />

course <strong>of</strong> employment to provide coverage for post-traumatic<br />

stress disorder (PTSD). Mental impairment means<br />

a diagnosis <strong>of</strong> PTSD by a licensed psychiatrist or psychologist.<br />

Mental impairment is not considered a disease<br />

if it results from a disciplinary action, work evaluation,<br />

job transfer, lay<strong>of</strong>f, demotion, promotion, termination,<br />

retirement, or similar action taken in good faith by the<br />

employer. Effective Oct. 1, <strong>2013</strong>, and applies to injuries<br />

occurring after that date.<br />

• Definition <strong>of</strong> “personal injury” expanded to<br />

include mental impairments. Section 2 amends<br />

Minn. Stat. § 176.011, subd. 16. It modifies the definition<br />

<strong>of</strong> “personal injury” to mean mental impairments<br />

or physical diseases arising out <strong>of</strong> and in the course <strong>of</strong><br />

employment to provide coverage for PTSD. Effective Oct.<br />

1, <strong>2013</strong>, and applies to injuries occurring after that date.<br />

• Limitation <strong>of</strong> fees modified. Section 3 amends Minn.<br />

Stat. § 176.081, subd. 1. It increases the cap on legal services<br />

fees to $26,000. The current cap is $13,000. Effective<br />

Oct. 1, <strong>2013</strong>, and applies to injuries occurring after that date.<br />

• Additional award authorization clarified. Section<br />

4 amends Minn. Stat. § 176.081, subd. 7. It clarifies that<br />

the subdivision applies only to contingent fees payable<br />

from the employee’s compensation benefits, and not to<br />

other fees paid by the employer and insurer, including<br />

but not limited to those fees payable for resolution <strong>of</strong> a<br />

medical dispute or rehabilitation dispute, or pursuant to<br />

Minn. Stat. § 176.191. Effective Oct. 1, <strong>2013</strong>, and applies to<br />

injuries occurring after that date.<br />

• Temporary total disability benefit level increased.<br />

Section 5 amends Minn. Stat. § 176.101, subd. 1. It<br />

increases the maximum weekly benefit amount from the<br />

current law level <strong>of</strong> $850 per week to 102 percent <strong>of</strong> the<br />

statewide average weekly wage for the period ending<br />

Dec. 31 <strong>of</strong> the preceding year. Effective Oct. 1, <strong>2013</strong>, and<br />

applies to injuries occurring after that date.<br />

• Job development services limitations provided. Section<br />

6 adds a provision to Minn. Stat. § 176.102, subd. 5.<br />

It provides that “job development” means systematic contact<br />

with prospective employers resulting in opportunities<br />

for interviews and employment that might not otherwise<br />

have existed, and includes identification <strong>of</strong> job leads and<br />

arranging for job interviews. Job development facilitates<br />

a prospective employer’s consideration <strong>of</strong> a qualified<br />

employee for employment. Job development services<br />

provided by a qualified rehabilitation consultant firm or a<br />

registered rehabilitation vendor must not exceed 20 hours<br />

per month or 26 consecutive or intermittent weeks. When<br />

13 consecutive or intermittent weeks <strong>of</strong> job development<br />

services have been provided, the qualified rehabilitation<br />

consultant must consult with the parties and either file a<br />

plan amendment reflecting an agreement by the parties to<br />

extend job development services for up to an additional<br />

13 consecutive or intermittent weeks, or file a request for<br />

a rehabilitation conference under Minn. Stat. § 176.106.<br />

The commissioner <strong>of</strong> DLI or a compensation judge may<br />

issue an order modifying the rehabilitation plan or make<br />

other determinations about the employee’s rehabilitation,<br />

but must not order more than 26 total consecutive or<br />

intermittent weeks <strong>of</strong> job development services. Effective<br />

Oct. 1, <strong>2013</strong>, and applies to injuries occurring after that date.<br />

• Rehabilitation consultants and vendors limits provided.<br />

Section 7 amends Minn. Stat. § 176.102, subd.<br />

10. It provides that an individual qualified rehabilitation<br />

consultant registered by DLI must not provide any<br />

medical, rehabilitation, or disability case management<br />

services related to an injury that is compensable under<br />

<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Summaries</strong> Page 21


this chapter when these services are part <strong>of</strong> the same<br />

claim, unless the case management services are part <strong>of</strong> an<br />

approved rehabilitation plan. Effective Oct. 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Administrative conference 60 day requirement<br />

modified. Section 8 amends Minn. Stat. § 176.106,<br />

subd. 3. It directs that administrative conferences on<br />

rehabilitation issues must be held within 21 days after<br />

a conference is requested, unless the issue involves only<br />

fees for rehab services that were already provided, or<br />

there is good cause for holding the hearing later than 21<br />

days. Effective Oct. 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Liability limit technical change provided. Section 9<br />

amends Minn. Stat. § 176.136, subd. 1b. It specifies that<br />

a prevailing charge for treatment, services, and supplies,<br />

and the liability <strong>of</strong> the employer, is limited. It must be<br />

based on no more than two years <strong>of</strong> billing data immediately<br />

preceding the service. Effective on Oct. 1, <strong>2013</strong>, and<br />

must be used to establish prevailing charges on or after that date.<br />

• Adjustment <strong>of</strong> benefits modified. Section 10<br />

amends Minn. Stat. § 176.645. It provides that, for injuries<br />

occurring on and after Oct. 1, <strong>2013</strong>, no adjustment<br />

increase shall exceed 3 percent a year. If the adjustment<br />

under the formula <strong>of</strong> this section would exceed 3<br />

percent, the increase shall be 3 percent. No adjustment<br />

under this section shall be less than 0 percent. Effective<br />

Oct. 1, <strong>2013</strong>, and applies to injuries occurring on and after<br />

that date.<br />

• Treatment standards for medical services clarified.<br />

Section 11 amends Minn. Stat. § 176.83, subd. 5. It clarifies<br />

the DLI commissioner’s current rulemaking authority<br />

to specifically address criteria for use <strong>of</strong> opioids or other<br />

narcotic medications. Effective Oct. 1, <strong>2013</strong>, and applies to<br />

employees with all dates <strong>of</strong> injury who receive treatment after the<br />

rules are adopted.<br />

• Patient advocate pilot program established. Section<br />

12 is a <strong>2013</strong> Session <strong>Law</strong> directing the commissioner<br />

<strong>of</strong> DLI to implement a two-year patient advocate program<br />

for employees with back injuries who are considering<br />

back fusion surgery. The purpose <strong>of</strong> the program<br />

is to ensure that injured workers understand their treatment<br />

options and receive treatment for their work injuries<br />

according to accepted medical standards. The services<br />

provided by the patient advocate will be paid for from the<br />

special compensation fund. Effective Oct. 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Reimbursement cost study required. Section 12 is<br />

a <strong>2013</strong> Session <strong>Law</strong> directing the commissioner <strong>of</strong> DLI<br />

to study the effectiveness and costs <strong>of</strong> potential reforms<br />

and barriers within the workers’ compensation carrier<br />

and health care provider reimbursement system,<br />

including, but not limited to, carrier administrative costs,<br />

prompt payment, uniform claim components, and the<br />

effect on provider reimbursements and injured worker<br />

co-payments <strong>of</strong> implementing the subjects studied. The<br />

commissioner must consult with interested stakeholders<br />

including health care providers, workers’ compensation<br />

Page 22<br />

insurance carriers, and representatives <strong>of</strong> business and<br />

labor to provide relevant data promptly to the department<br />

to complete the study. The commissioner must<br />

report findings and recommendations to the Workers’<br />

Compensation Advisory Council by Dec. 31, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

Effective May 17, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

(AF)<br />

Gender-neutral marriage authorized<br />

Chapter 74 (HF 1054*/SF 925) amends Minn. Stat. Ch.<br />

517. It changes the legal definition <strong>of</strong> marriage from<br />

“between a man and a woman” to “between two persons,”<br />

and removes a conforming requirement that a legal<br />

marriage may only be between persons <strong>of</strong> the opposite<br />

sex. It authorizes the marriage and divorce <strong>of</strong> two persons,<br />

regardless <strong>of</strong> gender, and recognizes for purposes <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Minnesota</strong> law marriages performed in other jurisdictions,<br />

regardless <strong>of</strong> the gender <strong>of</strong> the persons in the marriage. It<br />

also contains provisions which permit churches and religious<br />

associations to choose who can be married in their<br />

faith and to whom they will provide services, without<br />

the risk <strong>of</strong> liability. Finally, it provides that, wherever the<br />

term “marriage,” “marital,” “marry,” or “married” is used<br />

in <strong>Minnesota</strong> Statute in reference to the rights, obligations,<br />

or privileges <strong>of</strong> a couple under law, the term includes<br />

civil marriage, or individuals subject to civil marriage, as<br />

established by this chapter. A term subject to this definition<br />

must also be interpreted in reference to the context<br />

in which it appears, but may not be interpreted to limit or<br />

exclude any individual who has entered into a valid civil<br />

marriage contract under this chapter. (Note: This section is<br />

summarized in the <strong>2013</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Summaries</strong> to alert cities that<br />

the new law requires employers to treat married couples the same,<br />

regardless <strong>of</strong> the gender <strong>of</strong> the persons in the marriage, for purposes<br />

<strong>of</strong> providing employee benefits.) Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>. (AF)<br />

State labor contracts ratified<br />

Chapter 77 (HF 1069*/SF 1185) is a <strong>2013</strong> Session <strong>Law</strong><br />

ratifying collective bargaining agreements between the<br />

State <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> and employees belonging to collective<br />

bargaining units. The agreements were approved by the<br />

Legislative Coordinating Commission Subcommittee on<br />

Employee Relations on March 11, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Collective bargaining agreements ratified. Section<br />

1 provides that the agreements reached between the following<br />

labor groups and the State <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> are ratified:<br />

• American Federation <strong>of</strong> State, County and Municipal<br />

Employees<br />

• Inter Faculty Organization<br />

• <strong>Minnesota</strong> Nurses Association<br />

• Office <strong>of</strong> Higher Education (unrepresented employees<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Office <strong>of</strong> Higher Education)<br />

• <strong>Minnesota</strong> Government Engineering Council<br />

<strong>League</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>Cities</strong>


• <strong>Minnesota</strong> State University Association <strong>of</strong> Administrative<br />

and Service Faculty<br />

• <strong>Minnesota</strong> State College Faculty<br />

• <strong>Minnesota</strong> State Colleges and Universities (MnSCU)<br />

Administrators<br />

• <strong>Minnesota</strong> Insurance Marketplace<br />

• <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>Law</strong> Enforcement Association retroactive<br />

contract funding provided. Section 2 provides<br />

that if a collective bargaining agreement between<br />

the commissioner <strong>of</strong> the Department <strong>of</strong> Management<br />

and Budget (MMB) and the <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>Law</strong> Enforcement<br />

Association for the period from July 1, 2011, to<br />

June 30, <strong>2013</strong>, is not implemented before June 30, <strong>2013</strong>,<br />

the commissioner <strong>of</strong> MMB may allow the employing<br />

agencies to carry forward unexpended and unencumbered<br />

non-grant operating balances from fiscal year <strong>2013</strong><br />

to provide funding for any retroactive salary increase<br />

included in the final collective bargaining agreement for<br />

the period from July 1, 2011 to June 30, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

Effective May 21, <strong>2013</strong>. (AF)<br />

Employee sick leave benefit use expanded<br />

Chapter 87 (HF 568/SF 840*) amends Minn. Stat. §<br />

181.9413, which requires employers that have 21 or more<br />

employees at a work location to allow employees to use<br />

accrued personal sick leave to care for a sick child. This<br />

chapter expands existing requirement so that an employee<br />

can use up to 160 hours <strong>of</strong> accrued personal sick leave<br />

per year to care for an adult child, spouse, sibling, parent,<br />

grandparent, or stepparent. The chapter also provides that<br />

by Aug. 1, 2014, the commissioner <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> Management<br />

and Budget must analyze and report to the standing<br />

committees <strong>of</strong> the House <strong>of</strong> Representatives and Senate<br />

with jurisdiction over labor and workplace issues on<br />

the impact on the usage <strong>of</strong> sick leave by employees <strong>of</strong><br />

the executive branch <strong>of</strong> the state as a result <strong>of</strong> the expansion.<br />

The law does not prevent an employer from providing<br />

greater sick leave benefits than are provided for under<br />

the law. It also does not require employers to increase the<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> sick leave provided to employees, nor does it<br />

interfere with existing employer policies related to maximum<br />

sick leave accruals. Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>, and applies to<br />

sick leave used on or after that date. (AF)<br />

UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE<br />

Unemployment insurance provisions in the omnibus<br />

jobs and economic development bill<br />

Chapter 85 (HF 729*/SF 1057) is the omnibus jobs, economic<br />

development, housing, commerce, and energy bill.<br />

Article 4 <strong>of</strong> the bill contains unemployment insurance provisions,<br />

many <strong>of</strong> which are technical changes. The following<br />

is a summary <strong>of</strong> items that may be <strong>of</strong> interest to cities.<br />

• Converting lay<strong>of</strong>fs into <strong>Minnesota</strong> business program.<br />

Section 2 amends Minn. Stat. § 116L.17 to create<br />

the <strong>Minnesota</strong> CLIMB program, which is designed to<br />

assist dislocated workers in starting or growing a business.<br />

Section 9 amends Minn. Stat. § 268.133 to make<br />

CLIMB participants eligible for benefits. Participants will<br />

be considered to be in reemployment assistance training,<br />

but certain earning and working hour limitations under<br />

Minn. Stat. § 268.085 may be waived for up to 500 program<br />

applicants. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Shared work agreement modifications. Sections<br />

10-15 amend the shared work agreement statute, Minn.<br />

Stat. § 268.136. The agreements will now be referred<br />

to as shared work plans. The amendments add a notice<br />

requirement to employees, clarify the commissioner<br />

approval process, and allow for the modification <strong>of</strong> existing<br />

shared work plans subject to approval by the commissioner.<br />

Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Additional benefits for locked-out employees. Sections<br />

5-8 amend Minn. Stat. § 268.125 to create additional<br />

benefits for employees who stop work as a result<br />

<strong>of</strong> a lock-out. The additional benefits are not available<br />

for pr<strong>of</strong>essional athletes locked out by a pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

sports team. Effective May 25, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Employer tax reduction. Section 18 establishes a<br />

temporary reduction in the unemployment insurance<br />

employer tax, based upon the balance <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Minnesota</strong><br />

Unemployment Trust Fund. (Only cities that have<br />

elected to be taxpaying employers pay the unemployment<br />

insurance employer tax.) If on Sept. 30, <strong>2013</strong>, the<br />

fund balance is $800 million, the base tax rate for calendar<br />

year 2014 is 0.1 percent and there will be no additional<br />

assessment assigned. If on Sept. 30, 2014, the fund<br />

balance is more than $900 million, the base tax rate for<br />

calendar year 2015 will be 0.1 percent and there will be<br />

no additional assessment assigned. This section expires on<br />

Dec. 31, 2015. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

(PH)<br />

ENVIRONMENT<br />

Technical and consensus drainage law changes made<br />

Chapter 4 (*HF66/SF113) includes changes recommended<br />

by the Drainage Work Group to the state’s drainage<br />

law. The Drainage Work Group is a group <strong>of</strong> drainage<br />

stakeholders facilitated by the Board <strong>of</strong> Water and Soil<br />

Resources (BWSR). The changes primarily update definitions,<br />

terminology, and procedures to current drainage<br />

management practices, including watershed districts<br />

as being eligible drainage authorities, and streamlining<br />

record-keeping and record replacement procedures for<br />

county and joint-powers drainage authorities. Effective Aug.<br />

1, <strong>2013</strong>. (CJ)<br />

<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Summaries</strong> Page 23


Metro water group sunset extended<br />

Chapter 19 (*HF834/SF515) allows the Metropolitan<br />

Council to continue to operate the Metropolitan<br />

Area Water Supply Advisory Committee through 2016,<br />

as described in MN Stat § 473.1565, subdivision 2. This<br />

applies only to the seven-county metro area. Effective retroactively<br />

from Dec. 31, 2012. (CJ)<br />

180-day process for adopting organized collection<br />

replaced with 60-day negotiation period<br />

Chapter 45 (*SF510/HF128) eliminates the cumbersome<br />

180-day process for adopting organized collection, and<br />

replaces it with a 60-day negotiation period between a city<br />

and its licensed collectors. The new process is designed to<br />

give the current collectors the first chance to develop a<br />

proposal for organized collection. If the 60-day negotiation<br />

period ends without an agreement, a city can continue the<br />

process by adopting a resolution to form a committee to<br />

study organized collection and make recommendations.<br />

<strong>Cities</strong> that have already organized collection are exempt<br />

from the new law. Their current organized collection<br />

methods continue to govern.<br />

The steps for adopting organized solid waste collection<br />

under the new law are as follows:<br />

• Notice to public and licensed collectors. Before<br />

forming a committee to study organized collection, a<br />

city with more than one licensed collector must notify<br />

the public and its licensed collectors that it is considering<br />

organizing collection. The new law does not specify<br />

how notice should be provided. The <strong>League</strong> recommends<br />

providing both published notice and individual<br />

mailed notice to each licensed collector.<br />

• Sixty-day negotiation period. After a city provides<br />

notice <strong>of</strong> its intent to consider organizing collection, it<br />

must provide a 60-day negotiation period that is exclusive<br />

between the city and its licensed collectors. A city is not<br />

required to reach an agreement during this period.<br />

• The purpose <strong>of</strong> the negotiation period is to allow<br />

licensed collectors to develop a proposal in which they,<br />

as members <strong>of</strong> an organization <strong>of</strong> collectors, collect<br />

solid waste from designated sections <strong>of</strong> the city. The<br />

proposal must addresses specific issues set out in the<br />

new law.<br />

• If an agreement is reached with a city’s licensed collectors,<br />

it must be effective for three to seven years.<br />

The city must provide public notice and hold at least<br />

one public hearing before implementing the agreement.<br />

Organized collection cannot begin until at least<br />

six months after the effective date <strong>of</strong> the city’s decision<br />

to implement organized collection.<br />

• Committee formation. If a city does not reach<br />

an agreement with its licensed collectors during the<br />

negotiation period, it can form—by resolution—an<br />

“organized collection options committee” to study<br />

Page 24<br />

various methods <strong>of</strong> organizing collection and issue<br />

a report. The city council appoints the committee<br />

members, and the committee is subject to the Open<br />

Meeting <strong>Law</strong>. The committee must examine different<br />

methods <strong>of</strong> organizing collection (two <strong>of</strong> which are<br />

specified in the law); establish a list <strong>of</strong> criteria for<br />

evaluating the different methods <strong>of</strong> collection; collect<br />

information from other cities and towns with organized<br />

collection; and seek input at a minimum from the city<br />

council, the local <strong>of</strong>ficial responsible for solid waste<br />

issues, licensed solid waste and recycling collectors, and<br />

city residents.<br />

• Public notice, public hearing, and implementation.<br />

A city must provide public notice and hold at<br />

least one public hearing before deciding to implement<br />

organized collection. Organized collection cannot begin<br />

until at least six months after the effective date <strong>of</strong> the<br />

city’s decision to implement organized collection.<br />

Effective May 8, <strong>2013</strong>. (CJ)<br />

Environment trust fund projects<br />

Chapter 52 (*HF1113/SF987) is the annual package<br />

<strong>of</strong> projects funded from the environment and natural<br />

resources trust fund, which is funded through lottery proceeds.<br />

The Legislative Citizens Commission on <strong>Minnesota</strong><br />

Resources (LCCMR) develops the recommendation for a<br />

wide range <strong>of</strong> research and projects related to the environment.<br />

Several <strong>of</strong> this year’s approved projects are <strong>of</strong> interest<br />

to cities.<br />

• County geologic atlases. Subd. 3(b) provides $1.2<br />

million to the University <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> to continue to<br />

accelerate completion <strong>of</strong> county geologic atlases.<br />

• Specified county geologic atlases. Subd. 3(c) provides<br />

$1.2 million to the University <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> for<br />

additional work on the county geologic atlases <strong>of</strong> Houston<br />

and Winona Counties.<br />

• Wetland inventory. Subd. 3(d) provides $1 million to<br />

the Department <strong>of</strong> Natural Resources for continued<br />

work on a statewide wetland inventory.<br />

• Hydrogen generation from wastewater. Subd. 5(g)<br />

provides $240,000 to the University <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> to<br />

research uses <strong>of</strong> selected bacteria and polymer membranes<br />

being used to generate hydrogen from wastewater.<br />

• Emerald ash borer. Subd. 6(c) provides $600,000 to<br />

the University <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> and the Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Agriculture to evaluate and implement detection options<br />

for emerald ash borer.<br />

Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>. (CJ)<br />

Omnibus lands bill<br />

Chapter 73 (*HF740/SF886) is the omnibus lands bill.<br />

Legislative approval is needed to authorize the sale <strong>of</strong> taxforfeited<br />

parcels bordering public waters. The bill also contains<br />

some policy changes related to the acquisition and<br />

<strong>League</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>Cities</strong>


transfer <strong>of</strong> lands for the purposes <strong>of</strong> serving as school forests<br />

in sections 1-5. Sections 1-5 are effective May 21, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

The remainder <strong>of</strong> the sections are effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>. (CJ)<br />

Wastewater and stormwater funding program<br />

restrictions reduced<br />

Chapter 105 (*HF819/SF613) changes language related<br />

to wastewater and stormwater grant and loan programs<br />

administered through the Public facilities Authority (PFA).<br />

• Section 1 expands eligibility <strong>of</strong> the Total Maximum<br />

Daily Load grant program to include phosphorus and<br />

nitrogen reduction projects meeting certain criteria.<br />

• Sections 2 and 3 fix other criteria in the TMDL grant<br />

program to allow that broadened eligibility.<br />

• Section 4 increases maximum grant amount for technical<br />

assistance grants under the small community wastewater<br />

treatment program from $10,000 to $20,000 plus $1,000<br />

(up from $500) for each household up to a maximum <strong>of</strong><br />

$60,000 (up from $40,000).<br />

• Section 5 allows land-based disposal systems to be<br />

funded through the small community wastewater treatment<br />

program and matches grant eligibility criteria with<br />

the need criteria <strong>of</strong> the Wastewater Infrastructure Fund<br />

grant program.<br />

• Section 6 sets a new maximum on project funding at $2<br />

million (up from $500,000) under the small community<br />

wastewater treatment program.<br />

• Section 7 allows loans under the small community<br />

wastewater treatment program to be amortized over 20<br />

years.<br />

• Section 8 allows loans or portions <strong>of</strong> loans under<br />

the wastewater infrastructure funding program to be<br />

changed to grants if the community is deemed to have<br />

been eligible for a grant under normal eligibility criteria<br />

at the time the loan was made.<br />

• Section 9 and 10 clean up existing statute by changing<br />

the name <strong>of</strong> the TMDL grants program to the point<br />

source implementation grants program, removing references<br />

to deleted programs, and repealing the phosphorus<br />

reduction grants program and previous language limiting<br />

grant amounts.<br />

Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>. (CJ)<br />

Omnibus environmental budget bill<br />

Chapter 114 (*HF 976/ SF 1170) is the budget bill for<br />

state environment, natural resources, and agriculture. It<br />

allocates approximately $312 million <strong>of</strong> general fund revenue,<br />

plus funds from dedicated fees and special revenue<br />

accounts.<br />

Article 2: Agricultural policy changes<br />

Article 2 contains policy provisions related to agriculture.<br />

• Ag water quality certification. Sections 1, 2, and<br />

5-16 are all related to the new agricultural water certification<br />

program, a joint state and federal effort to<br />

improve agricultural land owner participation in existing<br />

voluntary conservation programs.<br />

• Noxious weeds. Sections 17-27 are all related to noxious<br />

weed statutes. The changes made are mostly minor<br />

or technical, except that section 21 contains a number <strong>of</strong><br />

definitions <strong>of</strong> new classes <strong>of</strong> noxious weeds.<br />

• Pesticides. Section 30 prohibits filling pesticide application<br />

equipment with water directly from public waters.<br />

It is already prohibited from public water supplies. Language<br />

is also added to prohibit cross connections to supplies<br />

used for filling pesticide application equipment.<br />

None <strong>of</strong> this applies to aquatic pesticide application.<br />

Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

Article 3: Environmental agency budgets<br />

Article 3 includes funding for the Pollution Control<br />

Agency (MPCA), Department <strong>of</strong> Natural Resources<br />

(DNR), and Board <strong>of</strong> Water and Soil Resources (BWSR),<br />

with funds also going to the Met Council, the Zoo, and<br />

the <strong>Minnesota</strong> Conservation Corps.<br />

• Pollution Control Agency. Section 3 appropriates<br />

funds to the PCA. It includes specific money related to<br />

SSTS (septic system) programs, air quality monitoring<br />

and emission reduction efforts to help the state avoid<br />

non-attainment with federal limits for ozone and fine<br />

particulate matter, SCORE recycling funds, funding for<br />

the Environmental Quality Board (EQB), and funding<br />

for the technical team formed as part <strong>of</strong> the solution to<br />

new regulation <strong>of</strong> silica sand mining.<br />

• Department <strong>of</strong> Natural Resources. Section 4 appropriates<br />

funds to the DNR. It includes $7.6 million to<br />

the ecological and water resources division for increased<br />

work on groundwater quality, quantity, and sustainability.<br />

This work was initially funded by increases to water<br />

appropriation fees, significantly weighted on city utility<br />

customers. It was instead funded out <strong>of</strong> the general fund.<br />

There is also significant funding for continues work to<br />

deal with aquatic invasive species.<br />

• Board <strong>of</strong> Water and Soil resources. Section 5 appropriates<br />

funds to BWSR. The funds are mostly passed<br />

through as cost-share grants to local units <strong>of</strong> government<br />

for work related to water quality and erosion control.<br />

• Met Council. Section 6 appropriates $17 million to the<br />

Metropolitan Council for metro parks.<br />

Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

Article 4: Environment policy changes<br />

Article 4 contains numerous changes to state laws related<br />

to the environment and natural resources. Effective July 1,<br />

<strong>2013</strong>, unless otherwise noted.<br />

• Motorized mobility devices. Section 2 addresses<br />

ADA requirements by allowing the DNR commissioner<br />

to establish by written order state policies for the use and<br />

<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Summaries</strong> Page 25


operation <strong>of</strong> motorized mobility devices on state administered<br />

lands and facilities.<br />

• Utility crossing fee waiver. Section 3 waives permit<br />

fees for utility crossing over state land or water if the<br />

crossing is within an existing road right-<strong>of</strong>-way.<br />

• ATV operation. Sections 10 and 11 deal with operation<br />

<strong>of</strong> ATVs in ditches and rights-<strong>of</strong>-way. The same<br />

changes were made in the game and fish omnibus policy<br />

bill (Chapter 121). Those changes are summarized in the<br />

Public Safety section.<br />

• Silica sand mining and processing. Numerous sections<br />

<strong>of</strong> this article pertain to regulations <strong>of</strong> silica sand<br />

operations in southeast <strong>Minnesota</strong>.<br />

• Section 66. Within the boundaries <strong>of</strong> the DNR<br />

Paleozoic Plateau Ecological Section, no excavation or<br />

mining <strong>of</strong> silica sand, including but not limited to digging,<br />

excavating, mining, drilling, blasting, tunneling,<br />

dredging, stripping, or shafting, may occur within one<br />

mile <strong>of</strong> a designated trout stream unless a silica sand<br />

mining trout stream setback permit has been issue by<br />

DNR. Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>, applies to new silica sand<br />

mining projects and projects for which environmental review<br />

documents have been noticed for public comments after April<br />

30, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Section 91, subd. 1-2. The EQB, in consultation<br />

with LGUs, is instructed to develop model standards<br />

and criteria for mining, processing, and transporting<br />

silica sand. The standards may be used by LGUs as they<br />

develop their local ordinances. Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Section 91, subd. 3-4. The EQB is instructed to<br />

assemble a silica sand technical assistance team to provide<br />

LGUs, at their request, with assistance with ordinance<br />

development, zoning, environmental review<br />

and permitting, monitoring, or other issues relating<br />

to silica sand. When an LGU requests recommendations<br />

from the technical assistance team the LGU must<br />

consider the findings or recommendations <strong>of</strong> the team<br />

in its approval or denial <strong>of</strong> a silica sand project. If the<br />

LGU does not agree with the team’s findings and recommendations,<br />

the detailed reasons for the disagreement<br />

must be part <strong>of</strong> the LGU record <strong>of</strong> decision.<br />

Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Section 92. Until two years after July 1, <strong>2013</strong>, an<br />

Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) must<br />

be prepared for any silica sand project that meets or<br />

exceeds any <strong>of</strong> a very specific list <strong>of</strong> thresholds, which<br />

are laid out, below. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>, and no permit<br />

for a silica sand project subject to this section may be<br />

approved after that date unless the required environmental<br />

review has been completed.<br />

··<br />

Excavates 20 or more acres <strong>of</strong> land to a mean depth<br />

<strong>of</strong> 10 feet or more during its existence. The local<br />

government is the responsible governmental unit; or<br />

··<br />

Is designed to store or is capable <strong>of</strong> storing more<br />

than 7,500 tons <strong>of</strong> silica sand or has an annual<br />

throughput <strong>of</strong> more than 200,000 tons <strong>of</strong> silica sand<br />

and is not required to receive a permit from the<br />

Pollution Control Agency. The Pollution Control<br />

Agency is the responsible governmental unit.<br />

··<br />

In addition to the contents required under statute<br />

and rule, an environmental assessment worksheet<br />

completed according to this section must include<br />

several specific items:<br />

››<br />

A hydrogeologic investigation assessing potential<br />

groundwater and surface water effects and geologic<br />

conditions that could create an increased risk<br />

<strong>of</strong> potentially significant effects on groundwater<br />

and surface water;<br />

››<br />

For a project with the potential to require a<br />

groundwater appropriation permit from the commissioner<br />

<strong>of</strong> natural resources, an assessment <strong>of</strong> the<br />

water resources available for appropriation;<br />

››<br />

An air quality impact assessment that includes an<br />

assessment <strong>of</strong> the potential effects from airborne<br />

particulates and dust;<br />

››<br />

A traffic impact analysis, including documentation<br />

<strong>of</strong> existing transportation systems, analysis <strong>of</strong> the<br />

potential effects <strong>of</strong> the project on transportation,<br />

and mitigation measures to eliminate or minimize<br />

adverse impacts;<br />

››<br />

An assessment <strong>of</strong> compatibility <strong>of</strong> the project with<br />

other existing uses; and<br />

››<br />

Mitigation measures that could eliminate or minimize<br />

any adverse environmental effects for the<br />

project.<br />

• Section 93. The EQB is instructed to create and<br />

maintain a library <strong>of</strong> LGU ordinances and LGU permits<br />

that have been approved for regulation <strong>of</strong> silica<br />

sand projects.<br />

• Section 105. Authorizes the expedited adoption <strong>of</strong><br />

rules by a number <strong>of</strong> state agencies related to aspects<br />

<strong>of</strong> silica sand mining, storage, and processing. Effective<br />

May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Section 106. An LGU may extend an interim ordinance<br />

or renew an expired ordinance prohibiting new<br />

or expanded silica sand projects for one year. Effective<br />

retroactively from March 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Groundwater policies. Numerous sections <strong>of</strong> this article<br />

amend existing statutes related to groundwater use<br />

and regulations.<br />

• Legislative approval. Sections 67 and 68 repeal<br />

existing legislative approval requirements for large<br />

water diversions or appropriations.<br />

• Preliminary well approval. Section 71 instructs the<br />

DNR to evaluate the likelihood that a water appropriation<br />

permit applicant will meet sustainability<br />

requirements prior to construction and to give written<br />

preliminary approval if the project is likely to meet<br />

Page 26<br />

<strong>League</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>Cities</strong>


those requirements. It is linked closely to section 74,<br />

which adds new requirements to the information that<br />

must be provided to the DNR before a well can be<br />

constructed under MN Stat § 103I.205, subdivision 1,<br />

paragraph (f), including location, aquifer serving as the<br />

water source, maximum daily/annual/seasonal pumping<br />

rates and volumes, and any other information<br />

needed by the agency to make its preliminary determination<br />

<strong>of</strong> sustainability.<br />

• Permits in groundwater management areas. Section<br />

72 allows the DNR to require wells drawing less<br />

than 10,000 gallons per day or 1 million gallons per<br />

year to need a water appropriation permit if an area<br />

is designated as a groundwater management area. The<br />

DNR can choose to waive flow metering and reporting<br />

requirements under MN Stat §103G.281 and cannot<br />

collect a permit application fee for these smaller<br />

permits.<br />

• DNR Report. Section 102 requires the DNR to<br />

report to the Legislature by Jan. 15, 2014, with any<br />

recommendations or draft legislation they identify as<br />

needed to carry out department responsibilities related<br />

to groundwater sustainability.<br />

• Wastewater lab certification. Section 76 includes<br />

new language related to the criteria for certifying labs<br />

that provide data to the state regarding whether NPDES<br />

and SDS permit holder are meeting permit requirements.<br />

It exempts for-pr<strong>of</strong>it, drinking water, and remediation<br />

analysis labs.<br />

• Architectural paint. Sections 78-79 direct producers<br />

<strong>of</strong> architectural paint, individually or through a stewardship<br />

organization, to implement and finance a statewide<br />

product stewardship program that manages the<br />

architectural paint by reducing the paint’s waste generation,<br />

promoting its reuse and recycling, and providing<br />

for negotiation and execution <strong>of</strong> agreements to collect,<br />

transport, and process the architectural paint for end-<strong>of</strong>life<br />

recycling and reuse. LGUs are not mandated to participate<br />

in this program, but can choose to enter into a<br />

contract with a producer or stewardship organization.<br />

• Corrective actions under petr<strong>of</strong>und. Sections 83-85<br />

and 87 are language that was worked out between cities,<br />

state agencies, and petroleum marketers on how<br />

to tighten up state ability to assure that environmental<br />

covenants travel with real property titles after corrective<br />

actions under the state petr<strong>of</strong>und program.<br />

• Hennepin County SWCD discontinued. Section 96<br />

ends a longstanding battle by discontinuing the Hennepin<br />

County Soil and Water District and transferring its<br />

responsibilities to the county. The county has been functioning<br />

in that capacity for a number <strong>of</strong> years already<br />

and had ceased funding the SWCD.<br />

• Priority funding for wastewater re-use. Section 100<br />

requires the MPCA to award bonus priority points to a<br />

project will result in an agency-approved beneficial use<br />

<strong>of</strong> treated wastewater that results in reducing or replacing<br />

the use <strong>of</strong> groundwater, surface water, or potable<br />

water, provided that the project component resulting in<br />

the beneficial use <strong>of</strong> wastewater accounts for at least 20<br />

percent <strong>of</strong> the total eligible cost <strong>of</strong> the project. Projects<br />

receiving points for land discharge beneficial use will not<br />

receive the additional 30 points. Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

Article 5: Sanitary district formation<br />

This article transfers the process for establishing a sanitary<br />

district to address water quality and public health concerns<br />

from the MPCA to the Office <strong>of</strong> Administrative Hearings<br />

(OAH). The process <strong>of</strong>ten involves annexation law disputes,<br />

with which the MPCA has no comfort or experience. The<br />

article also updates existing law to use current procedures,<br />

statutory references, and legal definitions.<br />

Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>, except for sections 5 and 12, which transfer<br />

authority to OAH and require petitioners to pay the costs for<br />

the preparation and submission <strong>of</strong> petitions, that are effective May<br />

24, <strong>2013</strong>. (CJ)<br />

Legacy spending bill gets controversial, earns first<br />

veto <strong>of</strong> session<br />

Chapter 137 (*HF 1183/ SF 1051) allocates the money<br />

from constitutionally dedicated sales tax funds targeted to<br />

environmental and cultural programs. Gov. Dayton eventually<br />

line-item vetoed two appropriations from the outdoor<br />

heritage fund that went against the recommendations<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Lessard-Sams Outdoor Heritage Council. The two<br />

vetoed line items were $6.3 million to metropolitan parks<br />

in Subd. 5(i) and $3 million for aquatic invasive species<br />

control in Subd. 5(j).<br />

Article 1: Outdoor Heritage Fund<br />

Article 1 appropriates $100 million in the next fiscal<br />

year from the Outdoor Heritage Fund. The funds in this<br />

account go to improve fish and wildlife habitat and to<br />

improve access to hunting and fishing. Most <strong>of</strong> the funds<br />

are spent in rural areas, but several allocations could allow<br />

land within cities to be eligible for either purchase in title<br />

or for purchase <strong>of</strong> permanent conservation easements.<br />

Those provisions include funding for aquatic management<br />

land purchases (Subd. 5(a)), for conservation projects, easements,<br />

and land purchases in Dakota County (Subd. 5(b)),<br />

for conservation projects, easements, and land purchases<br />

related to the <strong>Minnesota</strong>, Mississippi, and St. Croix Rivers<br />

in the metropolitan area (Subd. 5(d)), and for matching<br />

grants to local partner conservation organizations for<br />

projects, easements, and land purchases that will be open to<br />

public hunting and fishing (Subd. 5(j)).<br />

Article 2: Clean Water Fund<br />

Article 2 appropriates approximately $97.5 million for each<br />

fiscal year <strong>of</strong> the biennium. The clean water fund provides<br />

resources for the state to make progress on meeting federal<br />

<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Summaries</strong> Page 27


Clean Water Act requirements for identifying and cleaning<br />

up impaired lakes, rivers, and streams. It also funds other<br />

work to restore, enhance, and protect surface water quality<br />

and drinking water sources. It also contains environmental<br />

policy provisions.<br />

• Section 3 is funding for the Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture<br />

and includes $2.5 million per year for research into<br />

nitrate contamination <strong>of</strong> groundwater and $1.5 million<br />

per year to fund the agricultural water quality certification<br />

program, a state/federal partnership to improve<br />

landowner participation in existing voluntary conservation<br />

programs.<br />

• Section 4 is funding to the Public Facilities Authority for<br />

wastewater and stormwater infrastructure projects that<br />

address water quality impairments and under-sewered<br />

communities. $9 million each year goes to the Point<br />

Source Implementation grants program and $2 million<br />

each year goes to the small community wastewater treatment<br />

program.<br />

• Section 5 funds impaired water programs at the MPCA.<br />

It includes funds to continue to assess water quality<br />

on a watershed basis, develop TMDL reports on water<br />

impairments identified, complete implementation plans<br />

to address those impairments, and to monitor progress.<br />

It also includes $275,000 each year for research into<br />

stormwater best management practices, $900,000 each<br />

year for wastewater and stormwater NPDES permit<br />

TMDL implementation efforts, and $375,000 per year to<br />

support research into wastewater treatment technology<br />

and for an ongoing University <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong>-led technical<br />

group to provide technical support to wastewater<br />

system design teams and to promote new technologies<br />

to address existing and emerging wastewater treatment<br />

challenges.<br />

• Section 6 goes to the Department <strong>of</strong> Natural Resources.<br />

It includes $2 million per year for enhanced monitoring<br />

to determine the relationship between groundwater levels<br />

and stream flow, $615,000 per year to enhance work<br />

on county geologic atlases to provide data on groundwater<br />

supply and recharge, $3 million in the first year<br />

<strong>of</strong> the biennium to develop and designate groundwater<br />

management areas, and $500,000 per year in grants funds<br />

available to local governments that adopt shoreland land<br />

use protection standards that meet a list <strong>of</strong> criteria well<br />

beyond state shoreland rule requirements.<br />

• Section 7 provides funds to the Board <strong>of</strong> Water and Soil<br />

Resources. Most <strong>of</strong> their programs provide cost-share<br />

grants to local government partners.<br />

• Local government units organized for the management<br />

<strong>of</strong> water get access to $5 million in the first year<br />

and $7 million in the second year in grants for significantly<br />

reducing water pollution in targeted watersheds.<br />

• $9.7 million in the first year and $10.7 million in the<br />

second goes to a broad list <strong>of</strong> efforts that protect and<br />

restore lakes, rivers, streams, and drinking water in<br />

Page 28<br />

ways consistent with approved TMDL reports, including<br />

by keeping water on the land and through septic<br />

system programs.<br />

• $3.5 million in the first year and $4.5 million in the<br />

second go for targeted local resource protection and<br />

enhancement grants for projects and practices that<br />

supplement or exceed current state standards for protection,<br />

enhancement, and restoration <strong>of</strong> water quality<br />

in lakes, rivers, and streams or that protect groundwater<br />

from degradation, including compliance.<br />

• $1.3 million each year is available for permanent<br />

conservation easement purchase in wellhead<br />

protection areas.<br />

• $1.5 million each year goes for grants to local<br />

government related to reducing stormwater pollution<br />

impacts and on proven methods <strong>of</strong> retaining water for<br />

infiltration.<br />

• Section 8 funds programs at the Department <strong>of</strong> Health<br />

related to drinking water and groundwater protection.<br />

It includes funds to look at contaminants being found<br />

in drinking water that have no current health risk values<br />

determined, looking at the frequency <strong>of</strong> private well<br />

contamination, and developing a virus monitoring plan<br />

for groundwater supplies.<br />

• Section 9 provides funds to the Metropolitan Council.<br />

$500,000 each year goes to support inflow and infiltration<br />

mitigation in the metro area, $537,000 is provided<br />

to research groundwater and surface water connections<br />

in White Bear Lake, and $1 million each year goes for<br />

continues groundwater planning efforts.<br />

• Section 10 provides an additional $615,000 each year to<br />

the University <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> to speed the completion <strong>of</strong><br />

county geologic atlases.<br />

• Section 17 bans the sale and use <strong>of</strong> coal-tar based asphalt<br />

sealants statewide as <strong>of</strong> Jan. 1, 2014.<br />

• Sections 18-22 relate to Mississippi River Critical Corridor<br />

land use rule development. The provisions included<br />

reauthorization for the DNR to develop rules, but<br />

change the statutes that define what those rules must<br />

include to better protect existing uses and to remove<br />

specific requirements <strong>of</strong> definitions related to bluffs,<br />

slopes, and mapping.<br />

Article 3: Parks and Trails Fund<br />

Article 3 allocates $42.5 million each year to park and<br />

trail projects in the state. Despite early contention over the<br />

split <strong>of</strong> metropolitan and rural funding, the split will keep<br />

the balance <strong>of</strong> 40 percent for metropolitan area parks and<br />

trails, 40 percent for state parks and trails, and 20 percent<br />

for non-metro areas. Projects are specified for the metro<br />

and non-metro park and trail funds. A Greater <strong>Minnesota</strong><br />

Regional Parks and Trails Commission is established<br />

to determine which parks should be classified as being <strong>of</strong><br />

state or regional significance outside the metropolitan area<br />

and to make recommendations to the Legislature on future<br />

<strong>League</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>Cities</strong>


expenditures <strong>of</strong> funds to non-metro regional park projects,<br />

which was authorized to be formed as <strong>of</strong> May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

Article 4: Arts and Cultural Heritage Fund<br />

Article 4 allocates approximately $58 million each year to<br />

enhance access to the arts and cultural heritage. The funds<br />

are divided between a wide range <strong>of</strong> interests including<br />

public radio and television, zoos, cultural groups, the state<br />

historical society, and the state arts board. It includes $3<br />

million each year in support <strong>of</strong> regional library systems. It<br />

also included a policy provision that allows <strong>Minnesota</strong>-produced<br />

beer and wine to be served in the Rathkeller Cafe in<br />

the State Capitol, pending approval <strong>of</strong> the City <strong>of</strong> St. Paul.<br />

Article 5: General provisions<br />

Article 5 contains a policy requirement that no solar photovoltaic<br />

module may be funded in whole or in part by<br />

legacy funds unless they are made in <strong>Minnesota</strong>.<br />

All sections mentioned are effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>, unless otherwise<br />

noted. (CJ)<br />

GENERAL GOVERNMENT<br />

Alternative publication <strong>of</strong> bids for projects funded<br />

by special assessment<br />

Chapter 46 (HF 1196/SF 843*) adds a definition <strong>of</strong><br />

“recognized industry trade journal” to Minn. Stat. §<br />

331A.01, so that websites and other digital publications<br />

qualify for alternative publication purposes for certain<br />

projects. The bill amends Minn. Stat. § 429.041, subd. 1 to<br />

allow cities to publish advertisements for bids for projects<br />

funded by special assessment in recognized industry trade<br />

journals. Because <strong>of</strong> the shift from printed to electronic<br />

media, there are no longer publications that met the old<br />

definition <strong>of</strong> trade journal, which forced cities to publish<br />

advertisements in a paper published in a city <strong>of</strong> the first<br />

class in addition to the web-based publication. The new<br />

definition will eliminate the duplicative publication<br />

requirement. Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>. (PH)<br />

Met council cost allocation deferred payments permitted<br />

Chapter 101 (*HF 738/SF 551) makes minor and technical<br />

changes to the statutes related to the Met Council. Section<br />

3 allows a city to request that a cost allocated to them<br />

by the Met Council be deferred, in part or in total, to be<br />

paid on a schedule and with interest added as agreed to by<br />

the council. Effective May 25, <strong>2013</strong>. (CJ)<br />

Omnibus state government finance and veterans<br />

affairs bill<br />

Chapter 142 (HF 1184/SF 1589*) is the omnibus state<br />

government finance and veterans affairs bill. Article 1<br />

appropriates funding to state agencies, departments, councils<br />

and commissions. Articles 2-5 make several policy<br />

changes, some <strong>of</strong> which may be <strong>of</strong> interest to cities.<br />

Article 2: <strong>Minnesota</strong> sunset act<br />

• Sections 2-10 repeal the <strong>Minnesota</strong> Sunset Act and make<br />

conforming changes. Section 1 amends Minn. Stat. §<br />

3.885 permitting the Legislative Commission on Planning<br />

and Fiscal Policy to review executive branch advisory<br />

groups on criteria similar to those applied by the<br />

Sunset Commission. Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

Article 3: State government operations<br />

• Office <strong>of</strong> the Secretary <strong>of</strong> State to accept funds.<br />

Section 8 is new language, Minn. Stat. § 5.38, authorizing<br />

the Secretary <strong>of</strong> State (SOS) to solicit and accept<br />

funds from local governments to be used for technology<br />

projects and to enhance the state’s election system.<br />

The SOS and the local governmental unit shall agree to<br />

the amount <strong>of</strong> consideration to be paid under the agreement.<br />

This section also allows the SOS to accept federal<br />

funds for election purposes and specifies that a certain<br />

state statute that governs the disbursement <strong>of</strong> federal<br />

funds will or will not apply, depending on whether<br />

the terms <strong>of</strong> the grant require the state to maintain its<br />

efforts. Funds accepted under this section are deposited<br />

into a special revenue fund and are appropriated to<br />

the SOS. The SOS is required to report by Jan. 15 each<br />

year to the chair and ranking minority members <strong>of</strong> the<br />

finance committees <strong>of</strong> the house and senate. The report<br />

must include the total amounts received in the preceding<br />

year, the source <strong>of</strong> those funds, and the uses <strong>of</strong> the funds.<br />

Section 9 is new language, Minn. Stat. § 5B.1, authorizing<br />

the SOS to solicit and accept funds from individuals<br />

and apply for grants from charitable organizations to be<br />

used for the confidentiality program, Safe at Home, that<br />

provides data protection for victims <strong>of</strong> violence.<br />

• City and Town Accounting System (CTAS) s<strong>of</strong>tware.<br />

Section 10 adds new language, Minn. Stat. §<br />

6.475, permitting the state auditor to charge a onetime<br />

user fee to cities, towns and other government entities<br />

for the development, maintenance, and distribution <strong>of</strong><br />

the small city and town accounting system s<strong>of</strong>tware. The<br />

State Auditor shall consult with the <strong>Minnesota</strong> Association<br />

<strong>of</strong> Townships, the <strong>League</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>Cities</strong>, and<br />

the <strong>Minnesota</strong> Association <strong>of</strong> Small <strong>Cities</strong> to set the<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> the fee. If the CTAS s<strong>of</strong>tware ceases to be<br />

<strong>of</strong>fered by the State Auditor, any amount remaining in<br />

the CTAS account shall be equitably refunded to users<br />

and the account shall be closed.<br />

• State auditor enterprise fund. Section 13 creates<br />

Minn. Stat. § 6.581, the state auditor enterprise fund in<br />

the state treasury. The law requires that amounts received<br />

for the costs <strong>of</strong> the auditor’s examinations to be deposited<br />

into the fund.<br />

<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Summaries</strong> Page 29


• Business as vendor. Section 14 amends Minn. Stat. §<br />

13.591, subd. 3 changing when data submitted by a business<br />

to a government entity in response to a request for<br />

bids and proposals cease to be private or nonpublic. Under<br />

current law, the data is private or nonpublic until the bids<br />

or responses are opened; this section makes the data public<br />

at the time and date specified in the solicitation that<br />

bids or proposals are due. The law also changes what data<br />

remain private or nonpublic when all responses for bids<br />

or proposals are rejected prior to completion <strong>of</strong> the selection<br />

process. Under current law, all data except that made<br />

public at the bid or response opening remain private or<br />

nonpublic; as changed by this section, all data, other than<br />

the name <strong>of</strong> the bidder and the dollar amount specified in<br />

the bid or response, remain private and nonpublic.<br />

• E-Government Advisory Council. Section 25 establishes<br />

the E-Government Advisory Council to improve<br />

online government information services to citizens and<br />

businesses. The membership will include appointees<br />

knowledgeable in public access to government data. The<br />

council will convene its first meeting by Nov. 1, <strong>2013</strong>, and<br />

sunset on the first Monday in January 2016, after making<br />

recommendations to the Office <strong>of</strong> Enterprise Technology.<br />

Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong><br />

Article 4: Military and veterans provisions<br />

• State and municipal <strong>of</strong>ficers and employees<br />

authorized leave. Section 1 amends Minn. Stat. §<br />

192.26, subd. 1 permitting employees to choose when<br />

during a calendar year to take their paid 15-day military<br />

leave and allows employees to take it all at one time or<br />

to divide it at their discretion. Authorized leave may be<br />

taken without loss <strong>of</strong> pay, seniority status, efficiency rating,<br />

vacation, sick leave, or other benefits when engaged<br />

in training or active service.<br />

• Section 9 amends Minn. Stat. § 364.03, subd. 3 by<br />

broadening the means for showing competent evidence<br />

<strong>of</strong> rehabilitation to include the person’s having earned an<br />

honorable discharge from the military subsequent to the<br />

person’s adjudication for the crime.<br />

• Section 10 creates new language, amends Minn. Stat. §<br />

471.3457 authorizing cities and towns to give contract<br />

preferences to veteran-owned small business. The language<br />

is permissive.<br />

Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

Article 5: Revenue department<br />

• Automobile theft prevention surcharge. Section 10<br />

recodifies existing language into Minn. Stat. § 12971.1]<br />

to move the automobile theft prevention surcharge<br />

account, collection and administration to the Department<br />

<strong>of</strong> Revenue from the Department <strong>of</strong> Public Safety.<br />

Effective for premiums collected after June 30, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

(AL)<br />

Page 30<br />

HEALTH<br />

Updating terminology related to persons with disabilities<br />

Chapter 62 (HF 760*/SF 655) replaces outdated terminology<br />

related to persons with disabilities in various <strong>Minnesota</strong><br />

Statutes and Rules, including some that regulate<br />

municipalities. However, the bill makes no policy or substantive<br />

changes to statutes or rules. Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

(PH)<br />

<strong>Minnesota</strong> Insurance Marketplace Act (MNsure)<br />

Chapter 9 (HF 5*/SF 1) is the <strong>Minnesota</strong> Insurance Marketplace<br />

legislation which was enacted in response to the<br />

federal Affordable Care Act (ACA), Public <strong>Law</strong> 111-148.<br />

Under federal health care reform, states have the option<br />

<strong>of</strong> creating their own health insurance exchange as long as<br />

it meets certain federal requirements or optionally, a state<br />

can use a health insurance exchange supported in whole or<br />

in part by the federal Department <strong>of</strong> Health and Human<br />

Services. With the passage <strong>of</strong> this bill, <strong>Minnesota</strong> will now<br />

have a state system called MNsure, for individuals to shop<br />

for and purchase health insurance coverage to comply with<br />

the federal health insurance mandate. The new law is codified<br />

in a new statute, Minn. Stat. § 62V.<br />

Chapter 9 primarily establishes the infrastructure for<br />

the <strong>Minnesota</strong> Insurance Marketplace. The legislation creates<br />

a board <strong>of</strong> directors serving four-year staggered terms<br />

consisting <strong>of</strong> seven members in the executive branch <strong>of</strong><br />

state government, one <strong>of</strong> whom is the state Commissioner<br />

<strong>of</strong> Human Services, to oversee the health insurance<br />

exchange. The new law also establishes term limits for the<br />

board members and clarifies that the board will be subject<br />

to the Open Meeting <strong>Law</strong> and other state laws dealing<br />

with review and audit by the legislative auditor, conflicts <strong>of</strong><br />

interest and receipt <strong>of</strong> gifts.<br />

The legislation does not prohibit “qualified<br />

individuals” or “qualified employers” from selecting a<br />

health plan <strong>of</strong>fered outside <strong>of</strong> the Marketplace. The ACA<br />

defines a “qualified individual” as an individual who seeks<br />

to enroll in a qualified health plan through an exchange,<br />

resides in the State and is not incarcerated. A “qualified<br />

employer” is defined under Section 1312 <strong>of</strong> the ACA as<br />

generally meaning a “small employer” who elects to make<br />

all full time employees eligible for one or more qualified<br />

health plans available in the small group marketplace<br />

<strong>of</strong>fered through the health insurance exchange. The<br />

Affordable Care Act defines a “small employer,” for the<br />

purposes <strong>of</strong> health coverage, as an employer with at least<br />

one but not more than 100 employees but each State has<br />

the option to limit small employers to having no more<br />

than 50 employees until 2016. The <strong>Minnesota</strong> system<br />

will initially apply to employers with no more than 50<br />

employees. The <strong>Minnesota</strong> health insurance exchange<br />

<strong>League</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>Cities</strong>


could be expanded to large employers in the future by<br />

legislative action.<br />

All employers will be required to provide a written<br />

notice to each employee informing them <strong>of</strong> the existence<br />

<strong>of</strong> the State’s exchange and how to get in contact with<br />

the exchange, among other items. The notice was originally<br />

scheduled to be distributed by March 1, <strong>2013</strong>, but the<br />

requirement has been delayed until Oct. 1, <strong>2013</strong>, which<br />

will coordinate with the first open enrollment period for<br />

the Exchange.<br />

Effective March 21, <strong>2013</strong>. Any actions taken by any state agencies<br />

in furtherance <strong>of</strong> the design, development, and implementation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the <strong>Minnesota</strong> Insurance Marketplace prior to the effective<br />

date shall be considered actions taken by the <strong>Minnesota</strong> Insurance<br />

Marketplace and shall be governed by the provisions <strong>of</strong> this chapter<br />

and state law. Health plan and dental plan coverage through<br />

the <strong>Minnesota</strong> Insurance Marketplace is effective Jan. 1, 2014.<br />

(Note: The MNsure exchange can be accessed at: http://<br />

mn.gov/hix/. Further guidance on health care reform<br />

is available on the <strong>League</strong>’s website at: www.lmc.org/<br />

page/1/health-care-reform.jsp.)<br />

(AF)<br />

HOUSING<br />

Concentration limits <strong>of</strong> community-based homes<br />

(group homes)<br />

Chapter 108 (HF 1233*/SF 1034), Article 7, section 53 <strong>of</strong><br />

the omnibus Health and Human Services Act establishes<br />

a study by the commissioner <strong>of</strong> human services to develop<br />

recommendations on concentration limits on home and<br />

community-based settings, as consistent with <strong>Minnesota</strong><br />

Olmstead Plan. The report must be submitted to legislators<br />

by Feb. 1, 2014. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong> (HC)<br />

Contract for deed provision in the omnibus economic<br />

development budget bill<br />

Chapter 85 (HF 729*/SF 1057), the omnibus jobs, economic<br />

development, housing, commerce, and energy bill,<br />

contains new requirements for certain sales <strong>of</strong> residential<br />

homes by contract for deed.<br />

• Multiple seller definition. Section 7 contains definitions<br />

for the new notice requirements regarding sale <strong>of</strong><br />

properties through contract for deed by a multiple seller.<br />

Minn. Stat. § 559.201 defines a multiple seller as a person<br />

that has acted as a seller in four or more contracts for deed<br />

during the 12 months preceding the purchase agreement<br />

was executed or the date on which the purchaser executes<br />

a contract for deed. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>. (HC)<br />

• Notice disclosure requirement. Section 8, subd. 1 adds<br />

a new notice disclosure requirement for multiple sellers<br />

called “Important Information About Contracts for Deed.”<br />

• Subd. 2 exempts the notice requirement if the purchaser<br />

is represented by a licensed attorney or real<br />

estate broker, provided that the representation does not<br />

create a dual agency.<br />

• Subd. 3 specifies the verbatim language that must be<br />

included in the notice. The notice includes information<br />

on who is responsible for paying property taxes,<br />

homeowner’s insurance, and repairs and maintenance.<br />

The notice must also include recommendations to<br />

the purchaser to get advice from an attorney or the<br />

Home Ownership Center, get an appraisal and home<br />

inspection, buy title insurance, check with the city for<br />

inspection records or unpaid utility bills, check with<br />

the county or title company to see if another mortgage<br />

or lien is on the property, and to check with the<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce to see if interest rate not<br />

higher than the maximum rate allowed by law.<br />

• Subd. 4 allows the prospective purchaser five business<br />

days after actually receiving the notice to cancel<br />

a purchase agreement without penalty. The seller must<br />

refund all payments made by the prospective purchaser<br />

prior to cancellation.<br />

• Subd 5 provides for a private right <strong>of</strong> action to be filed<br />

by the purchaser against the multiple seller if the seller<br />

fails to deliver the timely notice. The seller is liable to<br />

the purchaser for damages, reasonable attorney fees<br />

and court costs.<br />

• Subd. 6 states that a violation <strong>of</strong> the notice provision<br />

does not invalidate the contract for deed.<br />

Section 8 is effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>, and applies to transactions<br />

in which the contract for deed and the purchase agreement for the<br />

contract for deed, if any, were both executed on or after that date.<br />

(HC)<br />

Dual tracking in foreclosure prohibited<br />

Chapter 115 (HF 1377/SF 1276*) makes changes to mortgage<br />

foreclosure laws. The following provisions may be <strong>of</strong><br />

interest to cities:<br />

• Notice delivery. Section 2 requires that the foreclosure<br />

notice be delivered up to the day <strong>of</strong> the foreclosure sale,<br />

rather than the day <strong>of</strong> redemption; sending a notice at<br />

least once every 60 days up to the date <strong>of</strong> the foreclosure<br />

sale meets this requirement. Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong><br />

• Dual tracking prohibition. Section 3, subd. 6 prohibits<br />

“dual tracking” in mortgage foreclosure proceedings.<br />

Dual tracking involves continuing the foreclosure process<br />

while a lender is considering a request from the borrower<br />

for a mortgage loan modification. Effective Oct. 31, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

(HC)<br />

Housing funding and policy provisions in the<br />

omnibus economic development budget bill<br />

Section 4 <strong>of</strong> Chapter 85 (HF 729*/SF 1057), the omnibus<br />

jobs, economic development, housing, commerce, and<br />

<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Summaries</strong> Page 31


energy bill, contains $101.4 million in appropriations to<br />

the <strong>Minnesota</strong> Housing Finance Agency for FY 2014-<br />

2015. This funding includes:<br />

• $28.4 million for the Economic Development and<br />

Housing Challenge Program.<br />

• $23.5 million for the Housing Trust Fund.<br />

• $5.6 million for the rental assistance program for mentally<br />

ill individuals.<br />

• $15.7 for family homeless prevention and assistant programs.<br />

• $1.6 million for the home ownership assistance program.<br />

• $8.4 for the affordable rental investment fund.<br />

• $5.5 million for the rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> single-family<br />

homes.<br />

• $1.5 million for the home homeownership, education,<br />

and training program.<br />

• $750,000 for nonpr<strong>of</strong>it capacity building grants.<br />

• $890,000 in grants to three housing service programs.<br />

• $6.3 million for rental rehabilitation.<br />

Within these appropriations, the following provisions<br />

impact cities:<br />

• Housing and Job Growth Initiative. Subd. 2(b)<br />

amends Minn. Stat. § 462A.33, the economic development<br />

and housing challenge program, to include a<br />

one-time appropriation <strong>of</strong> $10 million targeted toward<br />

communities and regions that have:<br />

• Low housing vacancy rates; and<br />

• cooperatively developed plan that identifies current<br />

and future housing needs; and one or more <strong>of</strong> the following:<br />

··<br />

experienced job growth since 2005 and have at least<br />

2,000 jobs within the commuter shed;<br />

··<br />

evidence <strong>of</strong> anticipated job expansion; or<br />

··<br />

significant portion <strong>of</strong> area employees who commute<br />

more than 30 miles between their residence and<br />

their employment.<br />

• Flood damage. Subd. 13 transfers excess money from<br />

the Challenge program’s appropriation in 2012 (estimated<br />

to be around $3 million) to the Housing Development<br />

Fund for the rehabilitation loan program. Until<br />

Aug. 1, 2014, priority for the use <strong>of</strong> these funds shall be<br />

given to assist eligible homeowners in the Duluth area<br />

(DR-4069) that were damaged as a result <strong>of</strong> the flooding<br />

that occurred June 14 to June 21, 2012.<br />

• Federally assisted housing. Subd. 7(b) amends Minn.<br />

Stat. § 462A.21, subd. 8b to require owners <strong>of</strong> federally<br />

assisted rental property to enter into an agreement that<br />

gives local units <strong>of</strong> government, housing and redevelopment<br />

authorizes, and nonpr<strong>of</strong>it housing organizations<br />

the right <strong>of</strong> first refusal if the rental property is <strong>of</strong>fered<br />

for sale.<br />

Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong> (HC)<br />

Page 32<br />

Housing Improvement Areas extension<br />

Chapter 143 (HF 677*/SF 552) is the omnibus tax law. It<br />

amends Minn. Stat. § 428A.21 to extend the authority for<br />

cities to create new Housing Improvement Areas for 15<br />

more years to June 30, 2028. Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong> (HC)<br />

Housing infrastructure bonds provisions in the<br />

omnibus economic development budget bill<br />

Chapter 85 (HF 729*/SF 1057), the omnibus jobs, economic<br />

development, housing, commerce, and energy<br />

bill, contains a provision related to housing infrastructure<br />

bonds. Article 5, section 42 contains a technical fix to the<br />

definition <strong>of</strong> “housing infrastructure bonds” in Minn. Stat.<br />

§ 462A.37, subd. 1 is a change recommended by bond<br />

council for existing housing infrastructure bond allocations.<br />

Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong> (HC)<br />

Mortgage foreclosure consultant and originator<br />

clarifications<br />

Chapter 17 (HF 129*/ SF 294) amends Minn. Stat. §<br />

325N.01 to clarify the definition <strong>of</strong> a foreclosure consultant<br />

and apply the regulations to mortgage originators who<br />

are negotiating the terms <strong>of</strong> an existing residential mortgage.<br />

This law applies provisions to mortgage originators<br />

that were originally only applied to foreclosure consultants.<br />

The provisions relate to definitions, rescission <strong>of</strong> foreclosure<br />

consultant contracts, contracts, violations, waivers, and<br />

remedies. Effective May 23, <strong>2013</strong>. (HC)<br />

Partial release <strong>of</strong> mortgage lien<br />

Chapter 10 (HF 87*/SF 249) amends Minn. Stat. §<br />

507.092 to allow for the recording <strong>of</strong> an affidavit <strong>of</strong> survivorship<br />

to change the address where property tax statements<br />

are sent, and amends Minn. Stat. § 507.403 to allow<br />

for the filing <strong>of</strong> a partial release <strong>of</strong> a mortgage lien. The law<br />

also updates filing requirements for common interest community<br />

certificates <strong>of</strong> title. Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>. (PH)<br />

Rental eviction appeal timeline and rent escrow<br />

changes<br />

Chapter 100 (HF 829*/SF 967) makes changes related to<br />

landlord tenant law, specifically on the timelines for eviction<br />

appeals and hearings when rent is held in escrow.<br />

• Penalty to landlord. Section 1 amends Minn. Stat. §<br />

504B.151, subd. 1 to provide a penalty <strong>of</strong> $500 if a landlord<br />

subject to a foreclosure creates a lease longer than<br />

allowed by statute.<br />

• Sunset provisions. Section 2 and 3 remove sunset provisions<br />

for foreclosure proceedings. Section 6 repeals a<br />

section <strong>of</strong> law that would have gone into effect Jan. 1,<br />

2015. Therefore, there will be no change in the current<br />

foreclosure proceeding process.<br />

• Judgment Appeal. Section 4 amends Minn. Stat. §<br />

504B.371, subd. 2 to change the time for appealing a<br />

judgment in an eviction action from 10 to 15 days.<br />

<strong>League</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>Cities</strong>


• Rent Escrow. Section 5 amends Minn. Stat. §<br />

504B.385, subd. 5 allows a hearing to be scheduled in a<br />

rent escrow case for violations in a residential building<br />

even when the tenant files the required notice and no<br />

rent is currently due to the landlord. This requirement<br />

does not relieve the tenant <strong>of</strong> the obligation to deposit<br />

rent that is due to the landlord after the filing <strong>of</strong> a hearing<br />

notice but before the hearing with a court administrator.<br />

Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>. (HC)<br />

LAND USE AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT<br />

Land use provisions in the omnibus jobs bill<br />

Chapter 85 (HF 729*/SF 1057), the omnibus jobs, economic<br />

development, housing, commerce, and energy bill,<br />

contains the following provisions related to land use:<br />

• Calculation <strong>of</strong> park dedication fees modified.<br />

Article 5, section 41 amends Minn. Stat. § 462.358, subd.<br />

2b, to clarify how a municipality must calculate a park<br />

dedication fee charged to developers in lieu <strong>of</strong> dedicating<br />

land for parks. Under current law, the fee must<br />

be based on the fair market value <strong>of</strong> land, although fair<br />

market value is not defined. The new law defines fair<br />

market value as the value <strong>of</strong> the land as determined<br />

by the municipality annually based on tax valuation or<br />

other relevant data. The new law also creates a means<br />

for resolving a dispute over the valuation. If a developer<br />

objects, then the value shall be as negotiated by the parties<br />

or based on the market value as determined by the<br />

municipality based on an independent appraisal <strong>of</strong> land<br />

in a same or similar land use category. The existing dispute<br />

resolution provision in Minn. Stat. § 462.358, subd.<br />

2c remains unchanged. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Minneapolis City & Park Board joint dedication<br />

fee. Article 5, section 43 amends <strong>Law</strong>s 2008 chapter 366,<br />

the session law relating to powers <strong>of</strong> the Minneapolis<br />

Park and Recreation Board, to allow the Board and the<br />

City <strong>of</strong> Minneapolis to jointly require land be dedicated<br />

to the public, or to impose a park dedication fee, in<br />

conjunction with a construction permit for new housing.<br />

The law allows the cash fee to be set at a flat rate.<br />

Effective the day after compliance by the governing body <strong>of</strong> both<br />

entities with <strong>Minnesota</strong> Statutes, section 645.021, subdivisions<br />

2 and 3, and applies to joint dedication fee ordinances adopted<br />

before, on, or after that date, except that no dedication or fee can<br />

be effective until after Dec. 31, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• St. Paul dedication fee. Article 5, section 44 authorizes<br />

the City <strong>of</strong> St. Paul to require dedication <strong>of</strong> park<br />

land or to impose a park dedication fee in conjunction<br />

with a construction permit for new housing and commercial<br />

and industrial development. The dedication or<br />

fee must be imposed by ordinance and the ordinance<br />

may exclude senior or affordable housing from the fee<br />

or dedication. The cash fee may be set at a flat rate. The<br />

law states that Minn. Stat. § 462.358, subd. 2b(b) and 2c<br />

apply to the application and use <strong>of</strong> the dedication or fee.<br />

Effective Jan. 1, 2014, and applies to ordinances adopted or<br />

amended by the city before, on, or after that date.<br />

(PH)<br />

LIQUOR<br />

Omnibus liquor bill<br />

Chapter 42 (HF 746/SF 541*) is the omnibus liquor bill.<br />

Following are provisions most relevant to cities:<br />

• Brewer taproom license. Section 1 amends Minn.<br />

Stat. § 340A.301, subd. 6b to allow cities with municipal<br />

liquor stores to issue brewer taproom licenses. This<br />

allows the sale <strong>of</strong> malt liquor produced by the brewer for<br />

consumption on the premises or adjacent to the brewery.<br />

Effective May 8, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Distillery samples. Section 2 amends Minn. Stat. §<br />

340A.301, subd. 6c which deals with microdistilleries.<br />

A microdistillery may now provide samples <strong>of</strong> distilled<br />

spirits on its premises. The samples may not be more<br />

than 15 milliliters per variety per person and no person<br />

can sample more than 45 milliliters in one day. Effective<br />

May 8, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Small brewer; license to distribute. Section 3 adds<br />

subdivision 6d to Minn. Stat. § 304A.301 regarding<br />

small brewer licensing and distribution <strong>of</strong> malt liquor.<br />

A brewer licensed under subd. 6, clauses (c), (i), or (j)<br />

may be issued a licensed by a municipality for <strong>of</strong>f-sale <strong>of</strong><br />

malt liquor packaged by the brewer. Previously, a brewer<br />

could produce no more than 3,500 barrels to make <strong>of</strong>fsale<br />

64 ounce containers commonly known as “growlers”.<br />

This change increases that to 20,000 barrels. Section<br />

4 makes conforming changes based on section 3. Effective<br />

May 8, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Interest in other business. Section 5 amends Minn.<br />

Stat. § 340A.301, subd. 7 to decrease the amount <strong>of</strong><br />

product a brewer may make and self-distribute. Prior to<br />

this change, the amount was set at 25,000 barrels and<br />

now the cut-<strong>of</strong>f is 20,000. Effective May 8, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Malt liquor on-sale educator license and tastings.<br />

Section 6 amends Minn. Stat. § 340A.4042 by<br />

adding a subdivision to include malt liquor educator<br />

on-sale licenses to wine educator licenses. The annual<br />

cost is $250 per license and will be issued by the commissioner<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Department <strong>of</strong> Public Safety. This will<br />

allow malt liquor tastings and education to be conducted<br />

the same as wine tastings. Section 7 amends Minn. Stat.<br />

§ 340A.418 to add malt liquor to the statute regarding<br />

wine tastings conducted by charitable, religious or other<br />

nonpr<strong>of</strong>it organizations. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Summaries</strong> Page 33


• Twin <strong>Cities</strong> in Motion temporary on-sale liquor<br />

license. Section 8 amends session law 1999, chapter 202,<br />

section 13 to update the liquor license for the Twin <strong>Cities</strong><br />

Marathon to reflect the change in name to “Twin<br />

<strong>Cities</strong> in Motion.” Effective May 8, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• City <strong>of</strong> Winnebago craft beer festival sunset<br />

extension. Section 9 amends a 2012 session law, chapter<br />

235, section 8 to extend the sunset date <strong>of</strong> the city<br />

council’s approval <strong>of</strong> the craft beer festival hosted by the<br />

City <strong>of</strong> Winnebago to Dec. 31, <strong>2013</strong>. Effective with local<br />

council approval and compliance with Minn. Stat. § 645.021.<br />

• Lowertown regional ballpark on-sale license. Section<br />

10 amends Minn. Stat. § 340A.404 to allow for<br />

intoxicating liquor to be sold at the St. Paul Saints ballpark.<br />

Effective with local council approval and compliance with<br />

Minn. Stat. § 645.021.<br />

• Sake <strong>of</strong>f-sale. Section 11 amends Minn. Stat. §<br />

340A.301 allowing the City <strong>of</strong> Minneapolis to issue an<br />

<strong>of</strong>f-sale license for the sale <strong>of</strong> sake produced packaged<br />

on the licensed premises. Effective with local council approval<br />

and compliance with Minn. Stat. § 645.021.<br />

• Valley Fair on-sale license. Section 12 amends Minn.<br />

Stat. § 340A.404 to allow the City <strong>of</strong> Shakopee to issue<br />

an on-sale intoxicating liquor license to Valley Fair. Effective<br />

with local council approval and compliance with Minn.<br />

Stat. § 645.021.<br />

• Sixty percent requirement removed for Minneapolis<br />

and St. Paul. Sections 13 and 14 amend Minn.<br />

Stat. § 340A.404 to remove the 60 percent requirement<br />

for Minneapolis and St. Paul as found in Minn. Stat. §<br />

340A.404, subd. 5b. Effective with local council approval and<br />

compliance with Minn. Stat. § 645.021.<br />

• Wheeler Field on-sale license. Section 15 amends<br />

Minn. Stat. § 340A.404 to allow the City <strong>of</strong> Duluth to<br />

issue an on-sale intoxicating liquor license to Wheeler<br />

Field for sale <strong>of</strong> 3.2 malt liquor at the concession stand<br />

and approved dining area <strong>of</strong> the premises. Effective with<br />

local council approval and compliance with Minn. Stat. §<br />

645.021.<br />

(AL)<br />

Page 34<br />

LOCAL LAWS<br />

(Note: Local tax provisions contained in Chapter 143, the<br />

omnibus tax bill, are summarized in the Taxes section.)<br />

Officer Tom Decker Memorial Highway Designated<br />

Chapter 12 (HF 146/SF 76*) adds a subdivision to Minn.<br />

Stat. § 161.14. The new subdivision provides that Trunk<br />

Highway 23 from the east border <strong>of</strong> the township <strong>of</strong><br />

Wakefield to the west border <strong>of</strong> the City <strong>of</strong> Richmond is<br />

designated as “Officer Tom Decker Memorial Highway.” It<br />

requires the commissioner <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Minnesota</strong> Department<br />

<strong>of</strong> Transportation to adopt a suitable design to mark this<br />

highway and erect appropriate signs. Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

(AF)<br />

Authority to negotiate certain agreements<br />

expanded to Hennepin County<br />

Chapter 41 (HF 1195*/SF 1111) amends a special law<br />

(<strong>Law</strong>s 1988, chapter 471, section 1, subd. 1, as amended by<br />

<strong>Law</strong>s 1994, chapter 450, section 1, and <strong>Law</strong>s 1996, chapter<br />

276, section 1) that currently applies to Minneapolis<br />

and the Minneapolis Public School District. Chapter 41<br />

expands this law to include Hennepin County. It would<br />

allow the county to negotiate agreements concerning hiring<br />

and terms and conditions <strong>of</strong> employment for skilled<br />

trade and craft workers and apprentices with local labor<br />

organizations representing the trades. Persons hired under<br />

the agreements would then be exempt from the classified<br />

service <strong>of</strong> Hennepin County. Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>. (AF)<br />

Local power line planning requirements<br />

Chapter 57 (*SF521/HF623) Section 2 <strong>of</strong> this act<br />

addresses a local high-voltage power line siting controversy<br />

in Plymouth. It requires a certificate <strong>of</strong> need determination<br />

and adds some specific criteria that must be determined<br />

before the siting process can continue. Effective the day following<br />

final enactment, and applies to route permits and certificate<br />

<strong>of</strong> need applications pending on or after that date. (CJ)<br />

Local law provisions in the omnibus economic<br />

development budget bill<br />

Chapter 85 (HF 729*/SF 1057), the omnibus jobs, economic<br />

development, housing, commerce, and energy bill,<br />

contains the following local law provisions:<br />

• Agricultural processing facility, City <strong>of</strong> Morris.<br />

Article 1, section 2, subd. 2(r) makes a one-time grant <strong>of</strong><br />

$750,000 to the City <strong>of</strong> Morris for loans or grants to an<br />

agricultural processing facility to make energy efficient<br />

improvements. The grant requires a match <strong>of</strong> $1.25 million<br />

from nonpublic sources. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Hockey Hall <strong>of</strong> Fame, City <strong>of</strong> Eveleth. Article 5,<br />

section 24, makes permanent a temporary distribution<br />

<strong>of</strong> the taconite tax to the City <strong>of</strong> Eveleth to support<br />

the Hockey Hall <strong>of</strong> Fame, provided that it continues to<br />

operate in the city. Eveleth must also secure donations<br />

from other donors to receive the distribution. Effective<br />

July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• RiverCentre Arena, City <strong>of</strong> St. Paul. Article 5,<br />

section 47 reduces the amount <strong>of</strong> the RiverCentre<br />

loan repayment by $500,000 for fiscal years 2014 and<br />

2015. The scheduled repayments for fiscal years 2016-<br />

2021 will not be paid to the state, but, rather, must<br />

be used to make arena improvement mutually agreed<br />

upon by the lessee and St. Paul’s lease representative.<br />

Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

<strong>League</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>Cities</strong>


• Whiskey Road improvements, City <strong>of</strong> Biwabik.<br />

Article 5, section 48 states that money held by St. Louis<br />

County for the Biwabik Whiskey Road improvement must<br />

accrue interest at market rate and be used for improvements<br />

to the road near Biwabik. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

(PH)<br />

Local provisions in omnibus transportation policy<br />

act<br />

Chapter 127 (HF 1416/SF 1270*) is the omnibus transportation<br />

policy act. Summarized below are provisions<br />

pertaining to specific cities or regions. (Note: Other provisions<br />

in Chapter 127 are summarized in the Transportation<br />

section <strong>of</strong> the <strong>2013</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Summaries</strong>.)<br />

• Pedestrian skyway connection required for Central<br />

Station. Section 61 is a <strong>2013</strong> Session <strong>Law</strong>. It<br />

requires the City <strong>of</strong> St. Paul to include construction or<br />

establishment <strong>of</strong> access to a pedestrian skyway system as<br />

part <strong>of</strong> the initial transit line construction <strong>of</strong> the Central<br />

Station on the Central Corridor light rail transit line.<br />

The council and city must ensure that public access to<br />

the pedestrian skyway system is provided by an elevator<br />

located at the site <strong>of</strong> the station. Effective May 25, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• U.S. Highway 53 relocation project authorized.<br />

Section 65 is a <strong>2013</strong> Session <strong>Law</strong> requiring that in<br />

selecting the preferred alternative for the project involving<br />

the relocation <strong>of</strong> marked U.S. Highway 53 between<br />

Eveleth and Virginia, the commissioner <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Minnesota</strong><br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Transportation (MnDOT) must:<br />

(1) prioritize as a District 1 project, the acceleration <strong>of</strong><br />

the scoping, relocation, design, and construction <strong>of</strong> this<br />

highway; (2) consider the economic and social impacts<br />

on the cities <strong>of</strong> Virginia, Eveleth, Gilbert, and Mountain<br />

Iron, and not select an alternative that will impose<br />

undue negative impact on the economies <strong>of</strong> these cities;<br />

and (3) refrain from closing the existing U.S. Highway<br />

53 corridor until construction <strong>of</strong> the rerouted highway<br />

is complete and the highway is open to vehicle traffic.<br />

Effective May 25, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Legislative Route 235 in Otter Tail County<br />

removed. Section 66 amends Minn. Stat. repeals Minn.<br />

Stat. § 161.115, subd. 166 one day after the commissioner<br />

<strong>of</strong> MnDOT receives a copy <strong>of</strong> the agreement<br />

between the commissioner and the governing body <strong>of</strong><br />

Otter Tail County to transfer jurisdiction <strong>of</strong> Legislative<br />

Route No. 235 and notifies the revisor <strong>of</strong> statutes. Effective<br />

one day after the commissioner <strong>of</strong> MnDOT receives a copy<br />

<strong>of</strong> the agreement between the commissioner and the governing<br />

body <strong>of</strong> Otter Tail County.<br />

• Legislative Route 256 in Blue Earth County<br />

removed. Section 67 repeals Minn. Stat. § 161.115, subdivision<br />

187, is repealed effective the day after the commissioner<br />

<strong>of</strong> MnDOT receives a copy <strong>of</strong> the agreement<br />

between the commissioner and the governing body <strong>of</strong><br />

Blue Earth County to transfer jurisdiction <strong>of</strong> Legislative<br />

Route No. 256 and notifies the revisor <strong>of</strong> statutes. Effective<br />

one day after the commissioner <strong>of</strong> MnDOT receives a copy<br />

<strong>of</strong> the agreement between the commissioner and the governing<br />

body <strong>of</strong> Blue Earth County.<br />

• Red Wing Shoes sign required. Section 68 is a<br />

<strong>2013</strong> Session <strong>Law</strong>. It provides that the commissioner <strong>of</strong><br />

MnDOT, after being assured <strong>of</strong> adequate funding from<br />

nonstate sources, must erect a specific service sign (for<br />

Red Wing Shoes) on the east side <strong>of</strong> marked Trunk<br />

Highway 52, near its intersection with 37th Street NW<br />

in Olmsted County. The sign must display the name or<br />

business panel, or both, <strong>of</strong> a retail establishment on the<br />

east side <strong>of</strong> marked Trunk Highway 52 that began operation<br />

before construction <strong>of</strong> the noise wall on the east<br />

side <strong>of</strong> marked Trunk Highway 52, and the premises <strong>of</strong><br />

which is blocked from view by the noise wall. Effective<br />

when nonstate funds are available.<br />

• Signage on Trunk Highway 47 in Anoka required.<br />

Section 69 is a <strong>2013</strong> Session <strong>Law</strong>. It requires that by<br />

Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>, the commissioner <strong>of</strong> MnDOT must erect<br />

additional signage on marked Trunk Highway 47 at the<br />

intersection with McKinley Street in Anoka indicating<br />

the turning and through lane requirements for the intersection.<br />

The City <strong>of</strong> Anoka must reimburse the commissioner<br />

for the signage. Effective May 25, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

(AF)<br />

Special freight distribution authorized for west central<br />

<strong>Minnesota</strong><br />

Chapter 140 (HF 316*/SF 300) creates Minn. Stat. §<br />

169.868. It allows annual permits for truck weights above<br />

the restricted amount in MnDOT District 4 to haul freight<br />

to or from a distribution facility that is constructed on or<br />

after July 1, <strong>2013</strong>. MnDOT District 4 serves Becker, Big<br />

Stone, Clay, Douglas, Grant, Mahnomen, Otter Tail, Pope,<br />

Stevens, Swift, Traverse, and Wilkin counties.<br />

• Six-axle vehicles weight limit increase allowed<br />

by permit. Subdivision 1 allows a road authority to<br />

issue an annual permit for a vehicle or combination <strong>of</strong><br />

vehicles with a combination <strong>of</strong> six or more axles to haul<br />

freight and to be operated with a gross vehicle weight<br />

up to: (1) 90,000 pounds; and (2) 99,000 pounds during<br />

the period set by the commissioner <strong>of</strong> MnDOT under<br />

Minn. Stat. § 169.826, subd. 1. The fee for a permit<br />

issued under this subdivision is $300.<br />

• Seven-axle vehicles weight limit increased by permit.<br />

Subdivision 2 allows a road authority to issue an<br />

annual permit for a vehicle or combination <strong>of</strong> vehicles<br />

with a combination <strong>of</strong> seven or more axles to haul<br />

freight and to be operated with a gross vehicle weight<br />

up to: (1) 97,000 pounds; and (2) 99,000 pounds during<br />

the period set by the commissioner <strong>of</strong> MnDOT under<br />

Minn. Stat. § 169.826, subd 1. The fee for a permit issued<br />

under this subdivision is $500.<br />

<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Summaries</strong> Page 35


• Restrictions provided. Subdivision 3 provides that<br />

vehicles issued permits under this section must comply<br />

with all requirements and restrictions in Minn. Stat.<br />

§ 169.865, subd. 3. A vehicle may be operated under a<br />

permit issued under this section only to haul freight to<br />

or from a distribution facility that is: (1) constructed on<br />

or after July 1, <strong>2013</strong>; and (2) located within MnDOT<br />

District 4.<br />

• Deposit <strong>of</strong> revenues provided. Subdivision 4 provides<br />

that revenue from the permits issued by MnDOT<br />

under this section must be deposited in the bridge<br />

inspection and signing account as provided under Minn.<br />

Stat. § 169.86, subd 5b.<br />

Effective May 25, <strong>2013</strong>. (AF)<br />

Disaster aid provided to southwest <strong>Minnesota</strong><br />

Chapter 141 (HF 1832/SF 1656*) is a <strong>2013</strong> Session <strong>Law</strong>.<br />

It provides $1.5 million from the general fund in fiscal year<br />

2014 to the commissioner <strong>of</strong> the Department <strong>of</strong> Public<br />

Safety for the purposes specified in Minn. Stat. § 12A.15,<br />

subdivision 1, to match federal disaster assistance for the<br />

severe winter storm that occurred April 9, <strong>2013</strong>, through<br />

April 11, <strong>2013</strong>, in the area designated under Presidential<br />

Declaration <strong>of</strong> a Major Disaster FEMA-4113-DR. It<br />

also provides $250,000 from the general fund in fiscal year<br />

2014 to the commissioner <strong>of</strong> the Department <strong>of</strong> Public<br />

Safety for the purposes specified in Minn. Stat. § 12A.15,<br />

subds. 2 and 2a, to remove debris and provide long-term<br />

recovery assistance for the same area. Effective May 25,<br />

<strong>2013</strong>. (AF)<br />

Page 36<br />

MISCELLANEOUS<br />

Campaign finance modifications<br />

Chapter 131 (SF 661*/HF 863) makes a number <strong>of</strong><br />

changes to the procedures and standards for campaign<br />

finance regulation and reporting, including increasing<br />

campaign spending and contribution limits for certain<br />

candidates and increasing thresholds for registration and<br />

reporting by certain types <strong>of</strong> entities. The law also expands<br />

the Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board’s<br />

enforcement authority to include certain provisions <strong>of</strong><br />

the Fair Campaign Practices Act. Article 2 amends Minn.<br />

Stat. § 10A.01, subd. 35 expanding the definition <strong>of</strong> “public<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficial” to include: district court judge, appeals court<br />

judge, or Supreme Court justice; and county commissioner.<br />

City <strong>of</strong>ficials and employees are not included in the<br />

definition. Effective May 25, <strong>2013</strong>. (AL)<br />

Determining legislator salary<br />

Chapter 124 (HF 1823*/SF 533) proposes an amendment<br />

to article IV, section 9 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Minnesota</strong> constitution.<br />

Currently, legislator salary is determined by law and<br />

the amendment would ask voters if the constitution should<br />

be amended to remove legislators’ ability to set their own<br />

salaries. Alternatively, a council would be established comprised<br />

<strong>of</strong>: one person who is not a judge from each congressional<br />

district, appointed by the chief justice <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Supreme Court; and one member from each congressional<br />

district, appointed by the governor. No member <strong>of</strong> the<br />

council can be a former or current legislator or lobbyist.<br />

The council must prescribe salaries by March 31 <strong>of</strong> each<br />

odd-numbered year with any changes in salary to take<br />

effect on July 1 <strong>of</strong> that year. The amendment will be presented<br />

to voters in the 2016 general election. (AL)<br />

Geospatial data sharing with government entities<br />

Chapter 96 (HF 1390*/SF 1298) amends Minn. Stat. §<br />

16E.30 updating provisions in the Geospatial Information<br />

Office. Of note for cities is section 4 requiring that electronic<br />

geospatial government data must be shared at no cost<br />

with government entities. A release <strong>of</strong> data must include<br />

metadata or other documentation that identifies the original<br />

authoritative data source. Government entities providing<br />

data under this subdivision are not required to provide<br />

data in an alternate format nor are they required to provide<br />

the same data to the same requestor more than four times<br />

per year. Government entities and agencies sharing and<br />

receiving electronic geospatial data under this subdivision<br />

are immune from civil liability arising out <strong>of</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> the<br />

shared electronic geospatial data and this does not authorize<br />

the release <strong>of</strong> data that are not public data. Effective May 25,<br />

<strong>2013</strong>. (AL)<br />

Hospital reports required<br />

Chapter 51 (HF 588*/SF 471) is a <strong>2013</strong> Session <strong>Law</strong> that<br />

requires a hospital staffing report and a study on nurse<br />

staffing levels and patient outcomes.<br />

• Hospital staffing report required. Section 1 provides<br />

that the chief nursing executive or designee<br />

<strong>of</strong> every hospital licensed under section 144.50 will<br />

develop a core staffing plan for each care unit. Prior to<br />

submitting the core staffing plan, hospitals must consult<br />

with representatives <strong>of</strong> the hospital medical staff, managerial<br />

and non-managerial care staff, and other relevant<br />

hospital personnel about the core staffing plan and the<br />

expected average number <strong>of</strong> patients upon which the<br />

staffing plan is based. Any substantial changes to the core<br />

staffing plan must be updated within 30 days. It requires<br />

hospitals to submit a core staffing plan to the <strong>Minnesota</strong><br />

Hospital Association (MHA) by Jan. 1, 2014, and<br />

requires MHA to post each hospital’s core staffing plan<br />

on its <strong>Minnesota</strong> Hospital Quality Report website by<br />

April 1, 2014. It also requires that on a quarterly basis,<br />

the MHA include each hospital’s actual direct patient<br />

care hours per patient per unit. Beginning on July 1,<br />

2014, and quarterly thereafter, hospitals must submit<br />

direct patient care reports to MHA.<br />

<strong>League</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>Cities</strong>


• Nursing study required. Section 2 requires the<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Health to convene a work group to<br />

consult with the department as they study the correlation<br />

between nurse staffing levels and patient outcomes.<br />

This report must be presented to the chairs and ranking<br />

minority members <strong>of</strong> the health and human services<br />

committees in the House <strong>of</strong> Representatives and the<br />

Senate by Jan. 15, 2015.<br />

• Appropriation provided. Section 3 provides $187,000<br />

in fiscal year 2014 and $65,000 in fiscal year 2015 from<br />

the general fund to the commissioner <strong>of</strong> the Department<br />

<strong>of</strong> Health for the completion <strong>of</strong> the study in section 2.<br />

This is a one-time appropriation.<br />

Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>. (AF)<br />

<strong>Law</strong>ful gambling modifications<br />

Chapter 79 (SF 1006*/HF 1060) makes changes related to<br />

lawful gambling, record keeping and other regulatory provisions.<br />

• Increased threshold for annual financial audits.<br />

Section 1 amends Minn. Stat. § 297E.06, subd. 4. Under<br />

current law, licensed organizations with gross receipts<br />

<strong>of</strong> more than $500,000 must have an annual financial<br />

audit <strong>of</strong> lawful gambling activities and funds. This section<br />

changes the threshold for required annual audits to<br />

$750,000. Organizations with less than $750,000 in gross<br />

receipts are only required to conduct a financial audit<br />

when the Commissioner <strong>of</strong> Revenue requires it.<br />

• Linked bingo game provider license application<br />

attachment. Section 2 amends Minn. Stat. § 349.1632,<br />

subd. 3 to change an amount certain to a minimum<br />

amount for a bond required for a linked bingo game<br />

provider to obtain a license. The bond secures payment<br />

<strong>of</strong> all linked bingo prizes. Under current law, an applicant<br />

for a linked bingo game provider license must provide<br />

evidence <strong>of</strong> a bond <strong>of</strong> $100,000. As modified in this<br />

section, the bond must be for “not less than” $100,000.<br />

• Off-site permits increase. Section 3 amends Minn.<br />

Stat. § 349.165, subd. 5 to increase from four to 12 the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> events in a calendar year that a licensed organization<br />

may conduct on a premise that is not its permitted<br />

premise in conjunction with a county fair, the<br />

State Fair, a church festival, or a civic celebration. The<br />

organization must first obtain authorization as required<br />

in Minn. Stat. § 349.213.<br />

• Increase in time limit for deposit <strong>of</strong> gambling<br />

receipts. Section 4 amends Minn. Stat. § 349.19, subd.<br />

2 to increase from two to four the number <strong>of</strong> business<br />

days in which gambling receipts from all electronic pulltab<br />

games and all linked electronic bingo games must be<br />

deposited into the gambling bank account.<br />

• Pull-tab records. Section 5 amends Minn. Stat. §<br />

349.19, subd. 10 to increase the dollar amount <strong>of</strong> a paper<br />

pull-tab prize that requires the winner to present identification<br />

in the form <strong>of</strong> a driver’s license, <strong>Minnesota</strong><br />

identification card or other identification the Gambling<br />

Control Board deems sufficient to allow the identification<br />

and tracking <strong>of</strong> the winner.<br />

• Pull tab reporting requirements. Section 6 is a new<br />

section permitting the commissioner <strong>of</strong> revenue to<br />

require a onetime closing <strong>of</strong> all currently active electronic<br />

pull-tab games on May 31, <strong>2013</strong>, for the purpose<br />

<strong>of</strong> moving to a uniform system <strong>of</strong> reporting for electronic<br />

pull-tab game activities on a monthly basis.<br />

Effective May 21, <strong>2013</strong>. (AL)<br />

Metropolitan Council redistricting<br />

Chapter 66 (SF 1564*/HF1684) amends Minn. Stat. §,<br />

473.123 by repealing subd. 3d, and adding a new subdivision<br />

to adopt the MC<strong>2013</strong>-4, the metropolitan redistricting<br />

plan. The council consists <strong>of</strong> 17 members all appointed<br />

by the governor, subject to the advice and consent <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Senate. Sixteen members are from districts, and the chair<br />

is appointed from the region at large. The members all<br />

serve at the pleasure <strong>of</strong> the governor. The Legislature must<br />

redraw the boundaries <strong>of</strong> the council districts after each<br />

decennial federal census so that each district has substantially<br />

equal population. Redistricting is effective in the year<br />

ending in the number “3.” Within 60 days after a redistricting<br />

plan takes effect, the governor must appoint members<br />

from the newly drawn districts. Maps illustrating the proposed<br />

new boundaries for each council district are available<br />

at http://bit.ly/17zEgBi. Effective May 16, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

(AL)<br />

MN.IT Services<br />

Chapter 134 (HF1389*/SF1245) makes various changes<br />

in the laws governing the Office <strong>of</strong> Enterprise Technology.<br />

This agency is also known as MN.IT Services. The bill<br />

changes all references to the “Office <strong>of</strong> Enterprise Technology”<br />

to “Office <strong>of</strong> MN.IT Services.” The bill also makes<br />

changes governing state finance and budget provisions<br />

and the role <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> Management and Budget<br />

(MMB). The following provisions are relevant to cities:<br />

• Statewide Radio Board membership. Section 27<br />

amends Minn. Stat. § 403.36, subd. 1 by removing the<br />

commissioner <strong>of</strong> Management and Budget as a member<br />

on the Statewide Radio Board. (Note: See Public Safety<br />

section for further details on changes to the Statewide Radio<br />

Board.)<br />

• Compilation <strong>of</strong> local impact notes. Section 6, subd<br />

2 amends Minn. Stat. § 3.989, subd. 2 permits the commissioner<br />

<strong>of</strong> management and budget to post a copy <strong>of</strong><br />

all local impact notes to the agency website.<br />

Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>. (LZ)<br />

<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Summaries</strong> Page 37


Motor vehicle fuel payment<br />

Chapter 67 (HF 1284*/SF 1131) adds a new section <strong>of</strong><br />

law to Minn. Stat. § 325E.08 regarding trade practices.<br />

Minn. Stat. § 325E.085 prohibits restriction on sale <strong>of</strong><br />

motor fuel in that no local unit <strong>of</strong> government can require<br />

any particular form <strong>of</strong> payment for motor fuel sales. Effective<br />

May 17, <strong>2013</strong>. (AL)<br />

Page 38<br />

PENSIONS AND RETIREMENT<br />

Pension plan <strong>of</strong>ficers required to report certain<br />

unlawful acts<br />

Chapter 35 (HF 441/SF 324*) amends Minn. Stat. §<br />

609.456, subd.1, the law requiring public employees and<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficers to report suspected theft, embezzlement, or unlawful<br />

use <strong>of</strong> public property to law enforcement and the state<br />

auditor. The chapter expands the provision to include <strong>of</strong>ficers<br />

<strong>of</strong> local pension plans. Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>. (AF)<br />

Omnibus pensions act<br />

Chapter 111 (HF 629/SF 489*) is the omnibus pensions<br />

act. It enacts the recommendations <strong>of</strong> the Legislative Commission<br />

on Pensions and Retirement (LCPR). The chapter<br />

contains 16 articles and over 20 stand-alone bills. Notably,<br />

Article 11 contains the Public Employees Police and Fire<br />

Retirement Plan (PERA-P&F) financial solvency plan,<br />

which include an employer contribution increase <strong>of</strong> 1.8<br />

percent <strong>of</strong> salary, phased in over two years. The PERA P&F<br />

solvency plan and other provisions <strong>of</strong> interest to cities are<br />

summarized below.<br />

Article 3: PERA administrative provisions<br />

• Student employee exclusion. Section 1 amends<br />

Minn. Stat. § 353.01, subd. 2b and excludes from PERA<br />

coverage student employees in a work-study program if<br />

the position is for five years or less. Current law excludes<br />

student employees if the position is for three years or<br />

less. Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Overtime credit during military service allowed.<br />

Section 2 amends Minn. Stat. § 353.01, subd. 16 to<br />

remove the prohibition against use <strong>of</strong> overtime salary<br />

from the USERRA-compliant military service credit<br />

purchase provision. Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Average salary for survivor benefits defined. Section<br />

3 amends Minn. Stat. § 353.01, subd. 7 to redefine<br />

“average salary” for determining surviving spouse and<br />

dependent child benefits. Average salary is defined as the<br />

average <strong>of</strong> the full-time monthly base salary rate for the<br />

last six months <strong>of</strong> allowable service. Part-time service<br />

must be prorated based on actual hours worked. Effective<br />

May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Designated beneficiary definition expanded. Section<br />

4 changes the definition <strong>of</strong> “designated beneficiary”<br />

to include trusts, estates, or persons legally authorized to<br />

act on behalf <strong>of</strong> the member, and amends Minn. Stat. §<br />

353.01, subd. 29 to require beneficiary designations to<br />

be made on or before the date <strong>of</strong> death <strong>of</strong> the member<br />

and in the form prescribed by the executive director.<br />

Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Social Security leveling option. Section 28 amends<br />

Minn. Stat. § 356.415, subd. 1 and eliminates a Social<br />

Security leveling option from the post-retirement adjustment<br />

provisions. Effective Jan. 1, 2014.<br />

Article 6: Volunteer firefighter retirement changes<br />

• Deadline for cost analysis review. Section 3 amends<br />

Minn. Stat. § 353G.05, subd. 2 by increasing the deadline<br />

for a municipality to act upon a volunteer fire department<br />

election to join the statewide volunteer firefighter<br />

plan from 90 to 120 days from receipt <strong>of</strong> the PERA cost<br />

analysis document. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Fiscal year defined. Section 4 defines the fiscal year as<br />

the calendar year for volunteer firefighter relief associations,<br />

amending Minn. Stat. § 424A.001. Effective May 24,<br />

<strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Service breaks. Section 5 amends Minn. Stat. §<br />

424A.01, subd. 6 and clarifies specific federal and state<br />

laws that under which breaks in service are exempted<br />

from the general law regarding service breaks. Effective<br />

May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Service separation definition. Section 6 clarifies an<br />

existing exception to the service separation requirement<br />

for volunteer firefighter associations under Minn. Stat. §<br />

424A.015, subd. 1. Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Deferred service interest rate approval. Section 9<br />

amends the deferred service pension provisions <strong>of</strong> the<br />

volunteer firefighter relief association under Minn. Stat.<br />

§ 424A.02, subd. 7. Any change in the interest rate paid<br />

during a period <strong>of</strong> deferral <strong>of</strong> a lump-sum service pension<br />

must be approved by the governing body <strong>of</strong> the<br />

municipality or the independent nonpr<strong>of</strong>it firefighting<br />

corporation. Effective Jan. 1, 2014.<br />

• Supplemental survivor benefit payment. Section 11<br />

amends Minn. Stat. § 424A.10, subd. 2 to require that an<br />

association pay a supplemental survivor benefit whenever<br />

it pays lump-sum survivor benefit, regardless <strong>of</strong><br />

whether such payment is authorized by the bylaws. Effective<br />

May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• White Bear Lake payment option. Section 12 permits<br />

the White Bear Lake Volunteer Firefighter Relief<br />

Association to provide a $2,000 lump-sum death benefit<br />

to the estates <strong>of</strong> firefighters with at least 20 years <strong>of</strong> service<br />

who retired before 2009. Effective with compliance by<br />

the City <strong>of</strong> White Bear Lake with Minn. Stat § 645.021.<br />

Article 8: Miscellaneous provisions<br />

• State Board <strong>of</strong> Investment information provided.<br />

<strong>League</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>Cities</strong>


Section 1 creates a new statute, Minn. Stat. § 6.496, that<br />

requires that the State Board <strong>of</strong> Investment to annually<br />

provide all volunteer firefighter relief associations with:<br />

(1) basic information on enrollment options and participation<br />

in the statewide volunteer firefighter retirement<br />

plan: and (2) recent and historic investment performance<br />

results <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Minnesota</strong> supplemental investment fund<br />

and options for participation in the fund. Effective July 1,<br />

<strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Development <strong>of</strong> early retirement factors. Section<br />

3 requires the PERA Board to approve early retirement<br />

and optional annuity factors, subject to approval by the<br />

LCPR, and to establish an implementation schedule,<br />

under Minn. Stat. § 353.03, subd. 3. Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

Article 10: PERA salary definitions<br />

• Section 1 amends Minn. Stat. § 353.01, subd. 10 by<br />

revising the definition <strong>of</strong> salary as follows:<br />

• Expands periodic compensation to include <strong>of</strong><br />

employee retirement contributions designated as<br />

“picked up” contributions under Minn. Stat. § 356.62.<br />

• Expands periodic compensation to include employee<br />

contributions to a supplemental plan or governmental<br />

trust to save for postretirement health care expenses<br />

under Minn. Stat. § 356.24, subd. 1(7).<br />

• Expands periodic compensation to include nonwrongful-discharge<br />

salary reductions remedied<br />

through a grievance, settlement, or court order, including<br />

any applicable pay increases that would have otherwise<br />

been earned.<br />

• Expands periodic compensation to include amounts<br />

paid during a personal, parental, or military leave <strong>of</strong><br />

absence.<br />

• Expands periodic compensation to include amounts<br />

paid during an authorized medical leave <strong>of</strong> absence<br />

if specified in advance to be at least one-half but no<br />

more than equal to the earnings received during the<br />

six months immediately preceding the leave.<br />

• Expands periodic compensation to include the compensation<br />

paid an employee for attaining or exceeding<br />

performance goals, duties, or measures during a specified<br />

period <strong>of</strong> employment.<br />

• Excludes from periodic compensation any unused<br />

annual leave in the form <strong>of</strong> lump-sum or periodic<br />

payments from periodic compensation.<br />

• Excludes from periodic compensation the payment to<br />

another person <strong>of</strong> the value <strong>of</strong> hours donated under a<br />

benevolent vacation, personal, or sick leave donation<br />

program.<br />

• Excludes from periodic compensation retirement<br />

incentive payments.<br />

• Excludes from periodic compensation per diem payments.<br />

• Excludes from periodic compensation disability insurance<br />

payments, including payments from an employer<br />

self-insurance arrangement.<br />

• Specifies the particular forms <strong>of</strong> fringe benefits that<br />

are excluded from periodic compensation. Excluded<br />

fringe benefits include, but are not limited to:<br />

employer-paid premiums or supplemental contributions<br />

for all types <strong>of</strong> insurance; membership dues<br />

for fitness or recreational facilities; payments or cash<br />

awards for a wellness program; the value <strong>of</strong> any nonmonetary<br />

benefits; any form <strong>of</strong> payment made in<br />

lieu <strong>of</strong> an employer-paid fringe benefit; an employerpaid<br />

amount to a deferred compensation or tax-sheltered<br />

annuity program; and any amount paid by the<br />

employer as a supplement to salary that is not available<br />

to the employee as cash.<br />

Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

Article 11: PERA P&F financial solvency measures<br />

• Average salary definition. Section 1 amends Minn.<br />

Stat. § 353.01, subd. 17a to include as part <strong>of</strong> “average<br />

salary” the salary <strong>of</strong> an employee earned after the<br />

employee reaches the new allowable service limit in<br />

Minn. Stat. § 356.651, subd. 3 (See, Section 8 below).<br />

Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Duty disability definition. Section 2 amends Minn.<br />

Stat. § 353.01, subd. 41 and redefines “duty disability.” A<br />

duty disability must now be the direct result <strong>of</strong> an injury<br />

arising out <strong>of</strong> inherently dangerous duties. Previous law<br />

stated that the injury must arise out <strong>of</strong> duties specific to<br />

protecting the property and personal safety <strong>of</strong> others and<br />

that present inherent dangers. Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• 20-year vesting period for new hires. Section 3<br />

amends Minn. Stat. § 353.01, subd. 47 by establishing a<br />

20-year proportional vesting periods for new hires beginning<br />

in 2014. A person who joins the plan after July 1,<br />

2014, becomes vested at 50 percent after 10 years, and an<br />

additional 10 percent per year until reaching 100 percent<br />

after 20 years. Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>, and applies to persons<br />

who become members <strong>of</strong> the association on or after July 1, 2014.<br />

• Disability benefit application requirements. Section<br />

4 amends § Minn. Stat. § 353.31, subd. 4 by requiring<br />

that an application for disability benefits contains (1)<br />

a “clear explanation” <strong>of</strong> any duties the individual cannot<br />

perform, and (2) an explanation <strong>of</strong> why the employer<br />

may or may not authorize continued employment to the<br />

applicant in the current or other position. Effective May<br />

24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Clarification <strong>of</strong> refund rights. Section 5 makes conforming<br />

changes to Minn. Stat. § 353.35 to clarify that<br />

the new allowable service limit in Minn. Stat. § 356.651,<br />

subd. 3 (See, Section 8 below), does not result in forfeiture<br />

<strong>of</strong> salary credit. Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Employee contribution increase. Section 6 amends<br />

Minn. Stat. § 353.65, subd. 2 to increase the employee<br />

<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Summaries</strong> Page 39


contribution rate from 9.6 percent <strong>of</strong> salary to 10.2 percent<br />

<strong>of</strong> salary in calendar year 2014, and to 10.8 percent<br />

<strong>of</strong> salary in calendar year 2015 and thereafter. Effective<br />

May 24, <strong>2013</strong>, and will apply to all wages paid in the first<br />

paycheck issued after Jan. 1, 2014 ,regardless <strong>of</strong> whether the<br />

pay period covers dates prior to 1/1/2014.<br />

• Employer contribution increase. Section 7 amends<br />

Minn. Stat. § 353.65, subd. 3 to increase the employer<br />

contribution rate from 14.4 percent <strong>of</strong> salary to 15.3<br />

percent <strong>of</strong> salary in calendar year 2014, and to 16.2 percent<br />

<strong>of</strong> salary in calendar year 2015 and thereafter. Effective<br />

May 24, <strong>2013</strong>, and will apply to all wages paid in the<br />

first paycheck issued after Jan. 1, 2014, regardless <strong>of</strong> whether<br />

the pay period covers dates prior to 1/1/2014.<br />

• Retirement annuity formula changes. Section 8<br />

makes changes to the retirement annuity formula in<br />

Minn. Stat. § 353.651, subd. 3:<br />

• To reflect the new 20-year vesting period, the annuity<br />

formula will be multiplied by the appropriate vesting<br />

percentage, as opposed to per year <strong>of</strong> service.<br />

• For members first enrolled after June 30, 2014, the<br />

allowable service included in the annuity calculation<br />

is capped at 33 years and the retirement annuity must<br />

not exceed 99 percent <strong>of</strong> the average salary.<br />

• For new members who exceed 33 years <strong>of</strong> allowable<br />

service, a prorated share <strong>of</strong> the excess service must be<br />

refunded to the member.<br />

Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Retirement penalty increased. Section 9 makes<br />

changes to the early retirement provisions in Minn. Stat.<br />

§ 353.651, subd. 4. The early retirement reduction factor<br />

is changed from 1.2 percent per year (2.4 percent for<br />

post-June 2007 retirements) to 5 percent per year, and is<br />

phased in over a period <strong>of</strong> 5 years, beginning on July 1,<br />

2014. Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Maximum family benefit. Section 11 amends Minn.<br />

Stat. § 353.657, subd.3a to specify that in the event that<br />

family benefit cap is reached, the benefit reduction must<br />

be made proportionately on the annuitant, surviving<br />

spouse, and dependent children. Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Postretirement adjustments for PERA General.<br />

Section 13 makes changes to the annual postretirement<br />

adjustments in Minn. Stat. § 356.415, subd. 1b. The<br />

annual adjustment remains at 1 percent until the plan<br />

reaches funding stability, which occurs when the market<br />

value <strong>of</strong> the retirement plan meets or exceeds 90 percent<br />

<strong>of</strong> the actuarial accrued liabilities in the two most<br />

recent consecutive actuarial valuations. When funding<br />

stability is reached, the annual postretirement adjustment<br />

increases to 2.5 percent. After funding stability is<br />

reached, the postretirement adjustment will decrease to<br />

1 percent in subsequent years if the funding level <strong>of</strong> the<br />

plan drops to 85 percent for two consecutive actuarial<br />

valuations, or drops to 80 percent for the most recent<br />

actuarial valuation.<br />

Page 40<br />

• Postretirement adjustments for PERA P&F. Section<br />

14 makes changes to the annual postretirement<br />

adjustments in Minn. Stat. § 356.415, subd. 1c. The current<br />

1 percent annual postretirement adjustment remains<br />

in place for current and near-term retirees, and delays<br />

the first retirement increase paid to new retirees for three<br />

years beginning on July 1, 2014.<br />

• When funding stability is reached, the annual postretirement<br />

adjustment increases to 2.5 percent. After<br />

funding stability is reached, the postretirement adjustment<br />

will decrease to 1 percent in subsequent years if<br />

the funding level <strong>of</strong> the plan drops to 85 percent for<br />

two consecutive actuarial valuations, or drops to 80<br />

percent for the most recent actuarial valuation.<br />

Article 15: Voluntary membership dues reduction.<br />

• Section 1 amends Minn. Stat. § 356.91 to require that<br />

the director <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Minnesota</strong> State Retirement System<br />

(MSRS) or PERA, upon request <strong>of</strong> the annuitant,<br />

must deduct from the retirement annuity an amount to<br />

be paid as membership dues or other payments to the<br />

labor union representing retired employees <strong>of</strong> which the<br />

annuitant is a member. Such payments shall be made on<br />

a monthly basis.<br />

• Section 1 authorizes the labor union that is the exclusive<br />

bargaining unit representing public employees or<br />

retired public employees to conduct blind mailings<br />

containing voluntary membership information or dues<br />

deduction cards to annuitants <strong>of</strong> MSRS or PERA. The<br />

organization must pay all costs associated with the mailing.<br />

Alternatively, PERA or MSRS may transmit contact<br />

information to a mailing center to perform a blind mailing,<br />

pursuant an agreement stating that neither the labor<br />

organization nor any other group may have access to the<br />

data.<br />

• Section 1 limits the number <strong>of</strong> mailings to two per year<br />

and states that the mailings may not be used for the purpose<br />

<strong>of</strong> supporting or opposing any candidate, political<br />

party, or ballot measure.<br />

Various effective dates. (PH)/(GC)/(AF)<br />

Fire and police department aid threshold for financial<br />

reports and audits modified<br />

Chapter 123 (HF 853*/SF 746) amends Minn. Stat. §<br />

69.051, subd. 1 by increasing the threshold at which the<br />

board <strong>of</strong> a salaried firefighters relief association, police<br />

relief association, and volunteer firefighters relief association<br />

must prepare a financial report from assets <strong>of</strong> at least<br />

$200,000 to assets <strong>of</strong> at least $500,000. Effective Aug. 1,<br />

<strong>2013</strong>. (AF)<br />

<strong>League</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>Cities</strong>


PUBLIC SAFETY<br />

Omnibus public safety finance act<br />

Chapter 86 (HF 724/SF 671*) is the omnibus public safety<br />

act. The chapter contains appropriations related to public<br />

safety, courts, corrections, and transportation. The chapter<br />

spends just under $1.96 billion for the FY 2014-2015<br />

biennium. Summarized below are provisions that may be<br />

<strong>of</strong> interest to cities.<br />

Article 1: Appropriations for FY 2014 and 2015<br />

Article 1 contains appropriations for the following state government<br />

entities: Supreme Court, Court <strong>of</strong> Appeals, Trial<br />

Courts, Guardian ad Litem Board, Tax Court, Uniform <strong>Law</strong>s<br />

Commission, Board on Judicial Standards, Board <strong>of</strong> Public<br />

Defense, Department <strong>of</strong> Public Safety, Peace Officers Standards<br />

and Training Board, Private Detective Board, Department<br />

<strong>of</strong> Human Rights, Department <strong>of</strong> Corrections, and<br />

Sentencing Guidelines Commission.<br />

• Supreme Court appropriation provided. Section 3<br />

appropriates $44.548 million for FY 2014 and $45.191<br />

million for FY 2015 to the Supreme Court. Effective July<br />

1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Supreme Court operations funded. $32.282 million<br />

in FY 2014 and $32.925 million in 2015 is for Supreme<br />

Court operations. This represents an approximately $3<br />

million funding increase over the previous biennium.<br />

Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Civil legal services funded. $12.266 in 2014 and<br />

$12.266 million in 2015 is for civil legal services. This<br />

represents a funding increase <strong>of</strong> over $1 million over the<br />

previous biennium. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Court <strong>of</strong> Appeals appropriation provided. Section<br />

4 provides $10.641 in 2014 and $11.035 million in<br />

2015 to the Court <strong>of</strong> Appeals. This amount represents an<br />

approximately $5,000 increase over the previous biennium.<br />

Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• District Courts appropriation provided. Section<br />

5 provides $247.459 million in 2014 and $256.622 in<br />

2015 to fund district courts. This amount represents an<br />

approximately $9 million increase over the previous<br />

biennium. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Tax Court appropriation provided. Section 7 appropriates<br />

$1.023 million in 2014 and $1.035 million in<br />

2015 for Tax Court. This represents an approximately<br />

$400,000 increase over the previous biennium. It specifies<br />

that $161,000 each year is for two law clerks, continuing<br />

legal education costs, and Westlaw costs; and that<br />

$25,000 each year is for the implementation and maintenance<br />

<strong>of</strong> a modern case management system. Effective<br />

July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Uniform <strong>Law</strong>s Commission funded. Section 8<br />

appropriates $147,000 in 2014 and $84,000 in 2015 to<br />

the Uniform <strong>Law</strong>s Commission. This amount represents<br />

an increase <strong>of</strong> approximately $140,000 over the previous<br />

biennium. $63,000 the first year is to pay back dues<br />

owing to the National Conference <strong>of</strong> Commissioners on<br />

Uniform State <strong>Law</strong>s. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Board on Judicial Standards funded. Section 9<br />

appropriates $756,000 in 2014 and $456,000 in 2015 to<br />

the Board on Judicial Standards. This amount represents<br />

a $10,000 increase over the previous biennium. Of this<br />

amount, $300,000 the first year is for deficiencies occurring<br />

in fiscal year <strong>2013</strong>. $125,000 each year is for special<br />

investigative and hearing costs for major disciplinary<br />

actions undertaken by the board. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Board <strong>of</strong> Public Defense funded. Section 10 appropriates<br />

$70.698 million in 2014 and $73.612 million<br />

in 2015 to the Board <strong>of</strong> Public Defense. This amount<br />

represents an approximately $12 million over the previous<br />

biennium. From this appropriation, the board must<br />

pay all outstanding billings as <strong>of</strong> June 30, <strong>2013</strong>, for transcripts.<br />

By Jan. 15, 2014, and by Jan. 15, 2015, the board<br />

must report to the chairs and ranking minority members<br />

<strong>of</strong> the House <strong>of</strong> Representatives and Senate committees<br />

with jurisdiction over criminal justice and judiciary<br />

finance on how this appropriation was spent, including<br />

information on new attorney and staff hires, salary<br />

and benefit increases, caseload reductions, technology<br />

improvements, and transcript costs and billings. Effective<br />

July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Sentencing Guidelines Commission funded. Section<br />

11 appropriates $886,000 in 2014 and $586,000<br />

in 2015 to the Sentencing Guidelines Commission.<br />

$300,000 the first year is for a transfer to the Office<br />

<strong>of</strong> Enterprise Technology for an electronic sentencing<br />

worksheet system. Any ongoing information technology<br />

support or costs for this application shall be incorporated<br />

into the service-level agreement and shall be paid to the<br />

Office <strong>of</strong> Enterprise Technology. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Department <strong>of</strong> Public Safety funded. Section 12<br />

appropriates $157.851 million in 2014 and $161.191<br />

million in 2015 to the Department <strong>of</strong> Public Safety<br />

(DPS). This amount is approximately the same as the<br />

appropriation made in the previous biennium.<br />

• Hazmat and chemical assessment teams funded.<br />

$604,000 each year is from the fire safety account in the<br />

special revenue fund. These amounts must be used to<br />

fund the hazardous materials and chemical assessment<br />

teams. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• School Safety Center reinstated. $455,000 the first<br />

year and $405,000 the second year from the general fund<br />

are to reinstate the School Safety Center and to provide<br />

for school safety. The commissioner <strong>of</strong> the DPS is<br />

directed to work collaboratively with the School Climate<br />

Council and the School Climate Center established<br />

under Minn. Stat. § 121A.07 and 127A.052. By Jan. 15,<br />

2014, and by Jan. 15, 2015, the commissioner <strong>of</strong> the DPS<br />

<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Summaries</strong> Page 41


must report to the chairs and ranking minority members<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Senate and House <strong>of</strong> Representatives committees<br />

with jurisdiction over criminal justice and judiciary<br />

funding on how this appropriation was spent. The report<br />

must specify the results achieved by the school safety<br />

center and the level <strong>of</strong> cooperation achieved between<br />

the commissioner and the School Climate Council and<br />

school climate center. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Bureau <strong>of</strong> Criminal Apprehension funded. $47.588<br />

million in 2014 and $47.197 million in 2015 are appropriated<br />

to the Bureau <strong>of</strong> Criminal Apprehension (BCA).<br />

This amount represents an approximate $10 million<br />

increase over the previous biennium. $1.941 million<br />

each year is from the trunk highway fund for laboratory<br />

analysis related to driving-while-impaired cases. $50,000<br />

the first year and $580,000 the second year from the<br />

general fund and $3 million the first year and $2 million<br />

the second year from the vehicle services account in<br />

the special revenue fund are to replace the state’s criminal<br />

history system. $1.36 million the first year and $1.36<br />

million the second year from the general fund are to<br />

replace the state’s crime reporting system. $125,000 the<br />

first year and $125,000 the second year from the general<br />

fund and $125,000 the first year and $125,000 the<br />

second year from the trunk highway fund are to replace<br />

forensic laboratory equipment at the BCA. $200,000 the<br />

first year and $200,000 the second year from the general<br />

fund and $200,000 the first year and $200,000 the<br />

second year from the trunk highway fund are to improve<br />

forensic laboratory staffing at the BCA. $310,000 the<br />

first year and $389,000 the second year from the general<br />

fund are to maintain Livescan fingerprinting machines.<br />

The BCA’s general fund base is reduced by $1,720,000<br />

in fiscal year 2014 and $2,329,000 in fiscal year 2015 to<br />

reflect one-time appropriations. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• State Fire Marshal funded. $9.555 million in 2014<br />

and $9.555 million in 2015 is appropriated to the State<br />

Fire Marshal. This appropriation is from the Fire Safety<br />

Account in the special revenue fund. $2.368 million<br />

the first year and $2.368 million the second year are for<br />

transfers to the general fund under Minn. Stat. § 297I.06,<br />

subd. 3. (which provides that these funds are transferred<br />

from the Fire Safety Account in the special revenue fund<br />

to the general fund to <strong>of</strong>fset the loss <strong>of</strong> revenue caused<br />

by the repeal <strong>of</strong> the one-half <strong>of</strong> 1 percent tax on fire<br />

insurance premiums). Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement. $2.485 million<br />

in 2014 and $2.485 million in 2015 are appropriated<br />

to Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement. This<br />

amount represents an approximately $400,000 increase<br />

over the previous biennium. $653,000 each year is from<br />

the alcohol enforcement account in the special revenue<br />

fund. Of this appropriation, $500,000 each year must<br />

be transferred to the general fund. $250,000 each year<br />

is appropriated from the <strong>Law</strong>ful Gambling Regulation<br />

Page 42<br />

Account in the special revenue fund.<br />

Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Office <strong>of</strong> Justice Programs funded. $36.106 million<br />

in 2014 and $36.106 million in 2015 are appropriated to<br />

the Office <strong>of</strong> Justice Programs. This amount represents<br />

an approximately $6 million increase over the previous<br />

biennium. $1.5 million each year must be distributed<br />

through an open and competitive grant process for<br />

existing crime victim programs; the funds must be used<br />

to meet the needs <strong>of</strong> underserved and unserved areas<br />

and populations. $100,000 each year is for a grant to the<br />

Community Offender Reentry Program for assisting<br />

individuals to transition from incarceration to the communities<br />

in and around Duluth, including assistance in<br />

finding housing, employment, educational opportunities,<br />

counseling, and other resources. $1 million each year is<br />

for youth intervention programs; the appropriations must<br />

be used to create new programs statewide in underserved<br />

areas and to help existing programs serve unmet<br />

needs in program communities. $350,000 each year is for<br />

a grant to Ramsey County to be used by the Ramsey<br />

County Attorney’s Office to: (1) develop a statewide<br />

model protocol for law enforcement, prosecutors, and<br />

others, who in their pr<strong>of</strong>essional capacity encounter sexually<br />

exploited and trafficked youth, on identifying and<br />

intervening with sexually exploited and trafficked youth;<br />

(2) conduct statewide training for law enforcement and<br />

prosecutors on the model protocol and the Safe Harbor<br />

<strong>Law</strong> described in <strong>Law</strong>s 2011, First Special Session chapter<br />

1, article 4, as modified by Senate File No. 384, article<br />

2, if enacted; and (3) develop and disseminate to law<br />

enforcement, prosecutors, and others, who in their pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

capacity encounter sexually exploited and trafficked<br />

youth, on investigative best practices to identify<br />

sex trafficked victims and traffickers. By Jan. 15, 2015,<br />

the Ramsey County Attorney’s Office shall report to the<br />

chairs and ranking minority members <strong>of</strong> the Senate and<br />

House <strong>of</strong> Representatives committees and divisions having<br />

jurisdiction over criminal justice policy and funding<br />

on how this appropriation was spent. $50,000 each<br />

year is for a grant to the Upper Midwest Community<br />

Policing Institute for use in training community safety<br />

personnel about the use <strong>of</strong> de-escalation strategies for<br />

handling returning veterans in crisis. $50,000 each year is<br />

for a grant to the Juvenile Detention Alternative Initiative.<br />

Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Emergency communication networks funded.<br />

$59.138 million in 2014 and $63.639 million in 2015<br />

are appropriated for the state’s emergency communication<br />

networks from the state government special revenue<br />

fund for 911 emergency telecommunications services.<br />

Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Public safety answering points funded. $13.664<br />

million each year is to be distributed to public safety<br />

<strong>League</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>Cities</strong>


answering points as provided in Minn. Stat. § 403.113,<br />

subd. 2. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Medical Resource Communication Centers<br />

funded. $683,000 each year is for grants to the <strong>Minnesota</strong><br />

Emergency Medical Services Regulatory Board<br />

for the Metro East and Metro West Medical Resource<br />

Communication Centers that were in operation before<br />

Jan. 1, 2000. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Allied Radio Matrix for Emergency Management<br />

debt payment provided. $23.261 million each year<br />

is to the commissioner <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> Management and<br />

Budget (MMB) to pay debt service on revenue bonds<br />

issued under Minn. Stat. § 403.275 for the Allied Radio<br />

Matrix for Emergency Management (ARMER). Any<br />

portion <strong>of</strong> this appropriation not needed to pay debt<br />

service in a fiscal year may be used by the commissioner<br />

<strong>of</strong> the DPS to pay cash for any <strong>of</strong> the capital improvements<br />

for which bond proceeds were appropriated by<br />

<strong>Law</strong>s 2005, chapter 136, Section 9, subd. 8; or <strong>Law</strong>s<br />

2007, chapter 54, Section 10, subdivision 8. Effective July<br />

1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• ARMER State Backbone Operating Costs funded.<br />

$9.25 million in 2014 and $9.65 million in 2015 are<br />

to the commissioner <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Minnesota</strong> Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Transportation (MnDOT) for costs <strong>of</strong> maintaining and<br />

operating the first and third phases <strong>of</strong> the ARMER<br />

backbone. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• ARMER improvements funded. $1 million each<br />

year is to the Statewide Radio Board for costs <strong>of</strong> design,<br />

construction, and maintenance <strong>of</strong>, and improvements to,<br />

those elements <strong>of</strong> the statewide public safety radio and<br />

communication system that support mutual aid communications<br />

and emergency medical services or provide<br />

interim enhancement <strong>of</strong> public safety communication<br />

interoperability in those areas <strong>of</strong> the state where the<br />

statewide public safety radio and communication system<br />

is not yet implemented. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Peace Officer Standards and Training Board<br />

funded. Section 13 appropriates $3.87 million in 2014<br />

and $3.87 million in 2015 to the Peace Officer Standards<br />

and Training (POST) Board. This appropriation is<br />

from the Peace Officer Training Account in the special<br />

revenue fund. Any new receipts credited to that account<br />

in the first year in excess <strong>of</strong> $3.87 million must be transferred<br />

and credited to the general fund. Any new receipts<br />

credited to that account in the second year in excess <strong>of</strong><br />

3.87 million must be transferred and credited to the general<br />

fund. $2.734 million each year is for reimbursements<br />

to local governments for peace <strong>of</strong>ficer training costs. This<br />

amount represents an approximately $200,000 increase<br />

over the previous biennium. Of the reimbursement<br />

amount $100,000 the first year is for reimbursements to<br />

local governments for peace <strong>of</strong>ficer training costs on sexually<br />

exploited and trafficked youth, including effectively<br />

identifying sex trafficked victims and traffickers, investigation<br />

techniques, and assisting sexually-exploited youth.<br />

Reimbursement will be provided on a flat fee basis <strong>of</strong><br />

$100 per diem per <strong>of</strong>ficer. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Private Detective Board funded. Section 14 provides<br />

$120,000 in each year <strong>of</strong> the biennium for the Private<br />

Detective Board. This is the same appropriation provided<br />

in the previous biennium. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Department <strong>of</strong> Human Rights funded. Section 15<br />

provides $3.297 million in each year <strong>of</strong> the biennium to<br />

the Dept. <strong>of</strong> Human Rights. This amount represents an<br />

approximately $200,000 increase over the previous biennium.<br />

$129,000 each year is for two additional contract<br />

compliance <strong>of</strong>ficers. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Department <strong>of</strong> Corrections funded. Section 16 provides<br />

$481.47 million in 2014 and $487.304 million in<br />

2015 to the Dept. <strong>of</strong> Corrections. This amount represents<br />

an approximately $55 million increase over the previous<br />

biennium. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

Article 2: Guardians and conservators<br />

Article 2 contains provisions related to guardians and conservators.<br />

This article is not directly relevant to city operations.<br />

Article 3: Criminal justice<br />

Article 3 makes policy reforms related to corrections, public<br />

safety, the human rights department, and the courts.<br />

• Conditional release <strong>of</strong> nonviolent drug <strong>of</strong>fenders<br />

provided. Section 3 creates Minn. Stat. § 244.0551. It<br />

authorizes the commissioner <strong>of</strong> the Dept. <strong>of</strong> Corrections<br />

to grant conditional release to nonviolent controlled<br />

substance <strong>of</strong>fenders if the <strong>of</strong>fenders serve a minimum<br />

portion <strong>of</strong> their sentences and complete substance abuse<br />

treatment while incarcerated. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Grant allocation formula modified. Section 5<br />

amends Minn. Stat. § 299A.73, subd. 3, by increasing<br />

from 1 percent to 5 percent, the percentage <strong>of</strong> the<br />

appropriation that may be used by the <strong>Minnesota</strong> Youth<br />

Intervention Programs Association for providing training<br />

and technical assistance to grantees. It also expands the<br />

allowable expenditures to include program and pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

development and tracking, analyzing, and reporting<br />

outcome data and exempts the association from the<br />

match obligation. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Court technology fee imposed. Section 6 adds a<br />

subdivision to Minn. Stat. § 357.021. It imposes a court<br />

technology fee <strong>of</strong> $2 on court filings made under section<br />

357.021, subdivision 2, clauses (1) to (13). (Examples <strong>of</strong><br />

these filings include the initial civil filing fees, motion<br />

fees, issuance <strong>of</strong> a subpoena, docketing fees, and others.)<br />

The court technology fee is deposited in a special<br />

revenue fund to be appropriated to the Supreme Court<br />

for distribution to the state courts and their justice partners<br />

for technology purposes. The section also authorizes<br />

<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Summaries</strong> Page 43


the Judicial Council to establish a board consisting <strong>of</strong><br />

members from the judicial branch, prosecutors, public<br />

defenders, and civil legal services to distribute the funds.<br />

It provides that applications may be accepted from the<br />

judicial branch, county and city attorneys’ <strong>of</strong>fices, the<br />

Board <strong>of</strong> Public Defense, civil legal services organizations,<br />

corrections agencies, and part-time public defender<br />

<strong>of</strong>fices. It directs the Judicial Council to submit two<br />

reports to the Legislature that provides an accounting<br />

and explanation <strong>of</strong> the distribution <strong>of</strong> funds. The subdivision<br />

sunsets on June 30, 2018. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

Article 4. Data integration project<br />

Article 4 requires improved collection and reporting <strong>of</strong><br />

information relevant to eligibility to possess and purchase<br />

firearms.<br />

• Dept. <strong>of</strong> Corrections fingerprints requirement<br />

modified. Section 1 amends Minn. Stat. § 241.301. It<br />

directs the commissioner <strong>of</strong> corrections to transfer fingerprint<br />

records <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fenders transferred to the custody<br />

<strong>of</strong> the commissioner from another state to the BCA or<br />

National Instant Criminal Background Check System<br />

(NICS) by electronic entry within 24 hours <strong>of</strong> receiving<br />

the fingerprints. If the BCA receives data under this<br />

section in nonelectronic format, the commissioner must<br />

convert that record into electronic format for entry into<br />

the searchable database within three business days <strong>of</strong><br />

receiving the record. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Transmittal <strong>of</strong> data to National Instant Criminal<br />

Background Check System required. Section 2<br />

amends Minn. Stat. § 253B.24. It directs a court to submit<br />

a mental health adjudication to NICS within three<br />

business days <strong>of</strong> issuing the ruling if it affects a mentally<br />

ill person’s right to possess firearms. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Local agencies fingerprints requirements modified.<br />

Section 3 amends Minn. Stat. § 299C.10, subd. 1. It<br />

requires local law enforcement agencies to submit electronic<br />

fingerprint records to state searchable databases<br />

within 24 hours <strong>of</strong> taking the fingerprints. Effective July<br />

1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• BCA fingerprints requirements modified. Section<br />

4 amends Minn. Stat. § 299C.10, subd. 3. It directs the<br />

BCA to convert paper records <strong>of</strong> fingerprints, thumbprints,<br />

and other identification data into electronic format<br />

within three business days <strong>of</strong> receiving the data.<br />

Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Identification data other than DNA requirements<br />

modified. Section 5 amends Minn. Stat. § 299C.11,<br />

subd. 1. It directs the BCA to enter alias data for persons<br />

listed in the BCA’s <strong>of</strong>fender database within three business<br />

days <strong>of</strong> the BCA becoming aware <strong>of</strong> the new identifying<br />

data. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Information on released prisoner required. Section<br />

6 amends Minn. Stat. § 299C.14. It directs sheriffs and<br />

the commissioner <strong>of</strong> corrections to enter specified data<br />

Page 44<br />

about soon-to-be-released <strong>of</strong>fenders into a bureau-managed<br />

<strong>of</strong>fender database. This transfer must occur within<br />

24 hours <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fender’s release. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Report by court administrator requirement<br />

authorized. Section 7 amends Minn. Stat. §299C.17. It<br />

authorizes the superintendent <strong>of</strong> the BCA to require the<br />

court administrator to provide the BCA with the sentence<br />

for each felony, gross misdemeanor, and targeted<br />

misdemeanor case within 24 hours <strong>of</strong> disposition <strong>of</strong> the<br />

case. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Notice <strong>of</strong> firearms disqualification required. Section<br />

8 amends Minn. Stat. § 624.713, subd. 3. It requires<br />

courts to provide notice to a person <strong>of</strong> their mental<br />

health civil commitment firearms disqualification. Effective<br />

Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Provision <strong>of</strong> firearms background check information.<br />

Section 9 adds a new subdivision to Minn. Stat.<br />

§ 624.713. It directs the courts to notify NICS whenever<br />

the court places a person (adult or juvenile), who<br />

is charged with committing a crime <strong>of</strong> violence, into a<br />

pretrial diversion program before disposition. The court<br />

must notify NICS <strong>of</strong> both the person’s placement and<br />

the ordered expiration date <strong>of</strong> the program, and when<br />

the person completes the program the prosecuting attorney<br />

must notify NICS <strong>of</strong> that fact in a timely manner.<br />

Minn. Stat. § 624.713 prohibits such a person from possessing<br />

firearms until successfully completing the pretrial<br />

diversion program. Effective Aug. 13, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Prior civil commitments and felony convictions.<br />

Section 10 is a <strong>2013</strong> Session <strong>Law</strong> that establishes a July<br />

1, 2014 deadline for courts and criminal justice agencies<br />

to enter data on civil commitments from Jan. 1, 1994,<br />

to Sept. 28, 2010, and felony convictions from 2008 to<br />

2012, if those records have not already been submitted<br />

to the appropriate searchable databases. Effective July 1,<br />

<strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Criminal and juvenile justice information policy<br />

group report required. Section 11 is a <strong>2013</strong> Session<br />

<strong>Law</strong> that directs the Criminal and Juvenile Justice<br />

Information Policy Group to submit a report to the<br />

Legislature recommending how to improve the search<br />

capabilities <strong>of</strong> BCA-managed databases. The group must<br />

report on the progress <strong>of</strong> reducing the number <strong>of</strong> files in<br />

suspense. The group must also consult with the revisor<br />

on other statutory changes needed to implement this bill<br />

and the group’s legislative recommendations. Effective July<br />

1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

(AF)<br />

Hazardous substance release report required to<br />

local 911 emergency dispatch center<br />

Chapter 92 (HF 814*/SF 1033) adds a provision to Minn.<br />

Stat. § 609.671, subd. 10. It requires the state emergency<br />

response center to direct a caller to notify a local 911<br />

<strong>League</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>Cities</strong>


emergency dispatch center <strong>of</strong> the release <strong>of</strong> a hazardous<br />

substance if the situation requires an immediate response<br />

or the area is unknown to the center. In all other cases, the<br />

state emergency response center must notify a local firefighting<br />

or law enforcement organization <strong>of</strong> the situation<br />

within 24 hours <strong>of</strong> receiving the notification. Effective Jan.<br />

1, 2014. (AF)<br />

Public safety provisions in the omnibus transportation<br />

finance act<br />

Chapter 117 (HF 1444*/SF 1173) is the <strong>2013</strong> omnibus<br />

transportation finance act. The chapter spends $2.394<br />

billion in FY 2014 and $2.346 in FY 2015. It sets the<br />

budget for the <strong>Minnesota</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Transportation<br />

(MnDOT) and part <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Minnesota</strong> Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Public Safety (DPS), as well as funding for the Metropolitan<br />

Council, for the upcoming biennium. It makes various<br />

changes in base appropriation levels largely reflecting the<br />

governor’s budget proposal, including increased appropriations<br />

for state roads, Driver and Vehicle Services, and<br />

capitol security. It authorizes $300 million in trunk highway<br />

bonds, available in fiscal year 2015, for the Corridors<br />

<strong>of</strong> Commerce program being established. Summarized are<br />

transportation provisions that may be <strong>of</strong> interest to cities.<br />

(Note: Transportation provisions in Chapter 117 are summarized<br />

in the Transportation section <strong>of</strong> the <strong>2013</strong> <strong>Law</strong><br />

<strong>Summaries</strong>.)<br />

Article 1: Appropriations for FY 2014 and 2015<br />

Article 1 provides a summary <strong>of</strong> all appropriations by fund.<br />

• Department <strong>of</strong> Public Safety funding provided.<br />

Section 5 provides $156.441 million in 2014 and<br />

$157.375 in million in 2015 to the DPS. Effective July 1,<br />

<strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Public safety <strong>of</strong>ficer survivor benefit funded.<br />

$380,000 in each year is from the general fund for payment<br />

<strong>of</strong> public safety <strong>of</strong>ficer survivor benefits under<br />

Minn. Stat. § 299A.44. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Continued health insurance benefit reimbursement<br />

funded. $1.367 million in each year is from the<br />

general fund to be deposited in the Public Safety Officer’s<br />

Benefit Account. This money is available for reimbursements<br />

under Minn. Stat. § 299A.465. Effective July<br />

1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• S<strong>of</strong>t body armor reimbursement funded. $600,000<br />

in each year is from the general fund and $100,000 in<br />

each year is from the Trunk Highway Fund for s<strong>of</strong>t body<br />

armor reimbursements under Minn. Stat. § 299A.38.<br />

Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Capitol Security recommendations funded.<br />

$1,250,000 in each year is to implement the recommendations<br />

<strong>of</strong> the advisory committee on Capitol Area<br />

Security under Minn. Stat. § 299E.04, including the creation<br />

<strong>of</strong> an emergency manager position under Minn.<br />

Stat. § 299E.01, subdivision 2, and an increase in the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> State Patrol troopers and other security <strong>of</strong>ficers<br />

assigned to the Capitol complex. The commissioner<br />

may not: (1) spend any money from the Trunk Highway<br />

fund for capitol security; or (2) permanently transfer any<br />

state trooper from the patrolling highways activity to<br />

capitol security. The commissioner may not transfer any<br />

money appropriated to the commissioner under this section:<br />

(1) to capitol security; or (2) from capitol security.<br />

Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

Article 3: Funding policy provisions<br />

Article 3 contains policy provisions related to transportation<br />

and public safety funding. (Note: The transportation<br />

provisions can be found in the Transportation section <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>2013</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Summaries</strong>.) Following are transportation<br />

provisions that may be <strong>of</strong> interest to cities:<br />

• Ignition interlock exception provided. Section 7<br />

amends Minn. Stat. § 169A.37, subd. 1. It Narrows the<br />

prohibition on driving a vehicle during plate impoundment,<br />

to allow a person to drive an employer-owned<br />

vehicle that is not required to be equipped with an ignition<br />

interlock. Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Implied consent advisory requirement exception<br />

provided. Section 8 amends Minn. Stat. § 169A.51,<br />

subd. 2. It creates an exception to the implied consent<br />

advisory requirement. It provides that a peace <strong>of</strong>ficer<br />

who is not pursuing an implied consent license revocation<br />

is not required to give an advisory to a person who<br />

is believed to have committed an alcohol or drug-related<br />

criminal vehicular operation (CVO) <strong>of</strong>fense. Effective July<br />

1, 2014.<br />

• License reinstatement eligibility modified. Section<br />

9 adds a subdivision to Minn. Stat. § 169A.55. It provides<br />

that a person who has committed an alcohol-related<br />

CVO <strong>of</strong>fense that resulted in injury but not death is eligible<br />

for license reinstatement once the person has submitted<br />

verification <strong>of</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> ignition interlock for<br />

the applicable time period. Effective July 1, 2014.<br />

• Driving permit allowed after 15 hours <strong>of</strong> instruction.<br />

Section 10 amends Minn. Stat. 171.05, subd. 2. It<br />

allows a person to get a driving instruction permit when<br />

taking classroom and behind-the-wheel concurrently,<br />

following at least 15 hours <strong>of</strong> classroom instruction (and<br />

when other requirements are met). It directs the department<br />

to adopt administrative rules and permits use <strong>of</strong><br />

the exempted rulemaking process. Under current law, a<br />

person must first complete the classroom portion and be<br />

enrolled in behind-the-wheel in order to obtain a permit.<br />

Effective Jan. 1, 2014.<br />

• Driver’s license renewal fee increased. Section 11<br />

amends Minn. Stat. §171.061, subd. 4. It increases, from<br />

$5 to $8, the filing fee charged for a new or renewal<br />

driver’s licenses and <strong>Minnesota</strong> identification cards. The<br />

same fee amount is imposed by agents authorized by<br />

Driver and Vehicle Services (DVS) to administer driver<br />

<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Summaries</strong> Page 45


licensing <strong>of</strong>fices, and by DVS at its locations. (Filing fees<br />

collected by agents are retained by them, and fees collected<br />

by DVS are deposited in an operating account in<br />

the special revenue fund for DVS program administration.)<br />

Effective Jan. 1, 2014.<br />

• Criminal vehicular operation; revocation periods.<br />

Section 12 adds a subdivision to Minn. Stat. § 171.17. It<br />

places DWI-related criminal vehicular operation revocation<br />

periods in statute (see section 41, paragraph (b)<br />

<strong>of</strong> this article—repealing related rules). Specifies the<br />

revocation period (ranging from two to 10 years) based<br />

on the resulting harm and/or number <strong>of</strong> qualified prior<br />

impaired driving incidents. Effective July 1, 2014.<br />

• Suspension; criminal vehicular operation and<br />

manslaughter. Section 13 creates Minn. Stat. §<br />

171.187. It requires the Department <strong>of</strong> Public Safety<br />

to suspend a person’s driver’s license if: (1) the peace<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficer certifies that there is probable cause to believe<br />

the person committed a DWI-related CVO <strong>of</strong>fense; or<br />

(2) the person has been formally charged with manslaughter<br />

or CVO, resulting from operation <strong>of</strong> a vehicle.<br />

It continues a suspension until the completion <strong>of</strong><br />

the criminal case or by order <strong>of</strong> the commissioner. It<br />

provides that, if a person is convicted, the commissioner<br />

must credit the time accrued under the suspension<br />

towards the revocation period. It authorizes the<br />

aggrieved person to request an administrative review <strong>of</strong><br />

the suspension. Effective July 1, 2014.<br />

• Conditions <strong>of</strong> issuance provided. Section 14 amends<br />

Minn. Stat. § 171.30, subd. 1 It allows issuance <strong>of</strong> a limited<br />

license to a person whose license was suspended<br />

under the new suspension provision created in section<br />

13. Effective July 1, 2014.<br />

• Non-alcohol related criminal vehicular operation<br />

license issuance. Section 15 amends Minn. Stat. §<br />

171.30, subd. 2a. It prevents issuance <strong>of</strong> a limited license<br />

for one year to a person convicted <strong>of</strong> a non-alcohol<br />

related criminal vehicular operation <strong>of</strong>fense, or an alcohol-related<br />

criminal vehicular homicide <strong>of</strong>fense. Effective<br />

July 1, 2014.<br />

• Alcohol related criminal vehicular operation<br />

<strong>of</strong>fender limited license prohibited. Section 16 adds<br />

a provision to Minn. Stat. § 171.30. It prohibits issuance<br />

<strong>of</strong> a limited license to a person convicted <strong>of</strong> an alcoholrelated<br />

criminal vehicular operation <strong>of</strong>fense involving<br />

injury but not death. Effective July 1, 2014.<br />

• Ignition interlock “program participant” definition<br />

modified. Section 17 amends Minn. Stat. §<br />

171.306, subd. 1. It amends the definition <strong>of</strong> an ignition<br />

interlock “program participant” to include a person<br />

whose license was suspended or revoked for an alcoholrelated<br />

criminal vehicular operation <strong>of</strong>fense involving<br />

injury but not death. Effective July 1, 2014.<br />

• Ignition interlock program participation authorized.<br />

Section 18 amends Minn. Stat. § 171.306, subd. 4.<br />

Page 46<br />

It allows participation in the ignition interlock program<br />

by someone whose license was suspended or revoked for<br />

an alcohol-related criminal vehicular operation <strong>of</strong>fense<br />

involving injury but not death. Effective July 1, 2014.<br />

• Capitol emergency manager position created. Section<br />

30 amends Minn. Stat. § 299E.01, subd. 2. It creates<br />

the position <strong>of</strong> emergency manager in the Capitol Complex<br />

Security Division permanent staff and assigns duties<br />

to the position. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Public Safety commissioner authority provided.<br />

Section 31 amends Minn. Stat. § 299E.01, subd. 3.<br />

Assigns the commissioner <strong>of</strong> the Department <strong>of</strong> Public<br />

Safety as the final authority over public safety and<br />

security in the Capitol complex. The commissioner <strong>of</strong><br />

the Department <strong>of</strong> Administration is responsible for the<br />

Capitol complex as provided under Minn. Stat., chapter<br />

16B, which assigns general management responsibilities.<br />

Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Probable cause certification required. Section 35<br />

creates Minn. Stat. § 629.344. It provides that an <strong>of</strong>ficer<br />

must certify to the Department <strong>of</strong> Public Safety a determination<br />

that probable cause exists to believe a person<br />

committed a DWI-related criminal vehicular operation<br />

<strong>of</strong>fenses. Effective July 1, 2014.<br />

(AF)<br />

ATV use statutes related to ditches and rights-<strong>of</strong>way<br />

revised<br />

Chapter 121 (*SF 796/HF 742) is the omnibus game and<br />

fish policy bill and contains two sections related to the<br />

operation <strong>of</strong> all-terrain vehicles (ATV):<br />

• Section 4 relates to youthful operators and states that a<br />

person 12 years <strong>of</strong> age but less than 16 years <strong>of</strong> age may<br />

operate an ATV on the bank, slope, or ditch <strong>of</strong> a public<br />

road right-<strong>of</strong>-way as permitted under MN Stat § 84.928<br />

if they both possess a valid all-terrain vehicle safety certificate<br />

issued by the commissioner and are accompanied<br />

by a parent or legal guardian on a separate ATV.<br />

• Section 6 amends MN Stat § 84.928, subd. 1 to allow<br />

the operation <strong>of</strong> a class 2 ATV on the bank, slope, or<br />

ditch <strong>of</strong> a public road right-<strong>of</strong>-way <strong>of</strong> a trunk, county<br />

state-aid, or county highway, but only to access businesses<br />

or make trail connections. Left turns may be made<br />

from any part <strong>of</strong> the road if it is safe to do so under the<br />

prevailing conditions, unless prohibited under paragraph<br />

(d) or (f) <strong>of</strong> that section <strong>of</strong> law.<br />

Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>. (CJ)<br />

Statewide Radio Board<br />

Chapter 32 (HF 669*/SF 803) makes changes to allow<br />

the Statewide Radio Board to restructure as the Statewide<br />

Emergency Communications Board to integrate interoperable<br />

emergency communication technologies—the Allied<br />

Radio Matrix for Emergency Response (ARMER) sys-<br />

<strong>League</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>Cities</strong>


tem, 911 service, wireless broadband—and allow a federally<br />

recognized tribal government to be integrated into a<br />

Regional Radio Board structure.<br />

• General. Section 4 amends Minn. Stat. § 403.37 subd 1.<br />

It gives the Statewide Radio Board the powers need to<br />

oversee planning, implementation, and maintenance <strong>of</strong><br />

the ARMER system.<br />

• Statewide emergency communication board. Section<br />

6 creates a new statute, Minn. Stat. § 403.382. It<br />

permits the Statewide Radio Board to elect to become<br />

the Statewide Emergency Communication Board, which<br />

would be responsible for statewide coordination <strong>of</strong> 911<br />

service as well as the ARMER system. The new provision<br />

requires the board to plan and coordinate a statewide<br />

public safety broadband network and other wireless<br />

communication technologies for public safety emergency<br />

communication networks.<br />

• Regional radio boards. Section 7 amends Minn. Stat.<br />

§ 403.39. It authorizes a regional radio board to include<br />

a federally recognized Indian tribe. It also permits a<br />

regional radio board to administer grants on behalf <strong>of</strong><br />

one or more public safety entities operating in the jurisdiction.<br />

Furthermore, it permits a regional radio board<br />

to expand the scope <strong>of</strong> its joint powers agreement to<br />

other public safety purposes.<br />

• Regional emergency communication boards. Section<br />

8 creates a new statute, Minn. Stat. § 403.392. It<br />

authorizes a regional radio board to elect to become a<br />

regional emergency communication board and include<br />

911 services.<br />

• Topical advisory committee. Section 9, amends<br />

Minn. Stat. § 403.40, subd. 2. It permits the statewide<br />

radio board to establish advisory groups to assist with the<br />

interoperable public safety communication system.<br />

• Repealer. Section 12 repeals Minn. Stat. § 403.33,<br />

which contained language for local planning. The statute<br />

was repealed to integrate statewide coordination and<br />

give comprehensive authority to the board to address all<br />

emergency communications.<br />

Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>. (LZ)<br />

TAXES<br />

Omnibus tax bill<br />

Chapter 143 (*HF 677/SF 552) is the <strong>2013</strong> omnibus tax<br />

bill. The bill raises roughly $2.1 billion in additional revenues<br />

to balance the state’s estimated $627 million deficit<br />

and to fund new spending priorities <strong>of</strong> the <strong>2013</strong> Legislature<br />

for the FY2014-2015 biennium. Chapter 143<br />

includes $411 million in spending for programs such as an<br />

expanded homestead credit refund, Local Government Aid,<br />

and County Program Aid. The bill also includes a general<br />

sales tax exemption for purchases by cities and counties.<br />

Article 1: Homestead credit refund and renter property tax<br />

refund<br />

Article 1 amends various sections <strong>of</strong> Minn. Stat. § 290A to<br />

modify and expand the homeowner and renter property<br />

tax refund programs.<br />

• Homeowner credit refund. The homeowner program<br />

is renamed the “homestead credit refund,” and the<br />

program is expanded by decreasing the income threshold<br />

percentages used to determine eligibility and increasing<br />

the maximum refund across all qualifying income ranges.<br />

The renters refund program is also modified with corresponding<br />

decreases in the income threshold percentages<br />

and increases in the maximum refund for renters across<br />

all income ranges. The changes in the homeowner and<br />

renters programs also provide that most voluntary contributions<br />

to retirement plans are not included in household<br />

income, and all distributions from retirement plans<br />

are included in household income.<br />

• Notice. To increase awareness <strong>of</strong> the homestead credit<br />

refund program, the law requires the commissioner to<br />

match property tax data submitted by the counties with<br />

income tax and other data collected by the Department<br />

<strong>of</strong> Revenue, and notify those homeowners whom the<br />

commissioner estimates may be eligible for a homestead<br />

credit refund <strong>of</strong> at least $1,000.<br />

Effective for homestead credit refunds based on taxes payable in<br />

2014 and rent paid in <strong>2013</strong> and thereafter, and effective for<br />

renter property tax refunds beginning with refunds based on rent<br />

paid in <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

Article 2: Property tax aids and credits<br />

• Disparity reduction credit. Section 1 amends Minn.<br />

Stat. § 273.1398, subd. 4 to increase the disparity reduction<br />

credit by providing that the credit will be the<br />

amount necessary to reduce the effective tax rate on<br />

commercial-industrial and apartment properties in the<br />

four border cities to 1.9 percent, compared to the current<br />

2.3 percent. Effective beginning with taxes payable in<br />

2014.<br />

• Sustainable Forest Incentive Program. Sections 2<br />

through 5 and sections 34 and 35 make changes to the<br />

<strong>Minnesota</strong> Sustainable Forest Incentive Program.<br />

• Section 2 amends Minn. Stat. § 290C.02, subd. 6 to<br />

exclude land exceeding 60,000 acres that is subject<br />

to a single conservation easement and any land that<br />

becomes subject to a conservation easement after May<br />

30, <strong>2013</strong>, from participation in the Sustainable Forest<br />

Incentive Act (SFIA) program. Effective for certifications<br />

and applications due in <strong>2013</strong> and thereafter.<br />

• Section 3 amends Minn. Stat. § 290C.03 to require<br />

that claimants enrolling more than 1,920 acres in the<br />

program must also allow motorized access on established<br />

and maintained roads and trails, unless the road<br />

or trail is temporarily closed for safety, natural resource,<br />

<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Summaries</strong> Page 47


or road damage reasons. Effective for calculations made in<br />

<strong>2013</strong> and thereafter.<br />

• Section 4 amends Minn. Stat. § 290C.055 to allow a<br />

participant to terminate its covenant in the program if<br />

future changes are made to the payment formula. Effective<br />

for calculations made in <strong>2013</strong> and thereafter.<br />

• Section 5 amends Minn. Stat. § 290C.07 to remove<br />

the $100,000 per recipient cap on SFIA payments.<br />

Effective for calculations made in <strong>2013</strong> and thereafter.<br />

• Section 34 is an uncodified session law that releases<br />

lands from their SFIA covenants if they are disqualified<br />

from participating in the program as a result <strong>of</strong><br />

conservation easements. Effective the day following final<br />

enactment.<br />

• Section 35 is an uncodified session law that allow<br />

lands that dropped out the SFIA program in response<br />

to the 2011 changes in the law to reenroll and qualify<br />

for <strong>2013</strong> SFIA payments, if they do so within 60 days<br />

after enactment <strong>of</strong> the bill. Effective the day following<br />

final enactment.<br />

• Police and firefighter retirement supplemental<br />

state aid. Section 6 creates a new section, Minn. Stat. §<br />

423A.022, to provide for annual state payments <strong>of</strong> $15.5<br />

million per year to support police and firefighter pension<br />

funds. Each year, $9 million will be paid to the Public<br />

Employees Retirement Association (PERA) as an amortization<br />

aid for the Police and Fire Fund, $5.5 million<br />

per year will be paid by formula to municipalities with<br />

voluntary firefighters, and $1 million will be paid to the<br />

<strong>Minnesota</strong> State Retirement System for deposit in the<br />

state patrol fund.<br />

The $5.5 million appropriation for voluntary firefighter<br />

pensions will be allocated to each municipality,<br />

except for municipalities with firefighter retirement<br />

coverage provided solely through the PERA Police and<br />

Fire Fund, in proportion to the most recent amount <strong>of</strong><br />

fire state aid paid to the municipality relative to the most<br />

recent statewide total fire state aid for all non-PERA<br />

P&F municipalities. There will be no additional filing<br />

requirement beyond the March 15 fire state aid application<br />

in order to receive the additional aid amount.<br />

Although the total amount <strong>of</strong> available fire state aid is<br />

not known at this time, the $5.5 million appropriation<br />

would have resulted in a roughly 30 percent increase in<br />

the fire aid amount if it had been in place for the 2012<br />

distribution. The final <strong>2013</strong> increase percentage will be<br />

based on the actual available fire state aid.<br />

The allocated amount for fire departments participating<br />

in the PERA voluntary statewide lump-sum volunteer<br />

firefighter retirement plan will be paid directly to<br />

PERA, credited to the respective account, and deposited<br />

in the fund. For other local plans, the amount will be<br />

paid to each municipality, and transmitted within 30 days<br />

<strong>of</strong> receipt to the applicable volunteer firefighter relief<br />

association for deposit in its special fund.<br />

Page 48<br />

The aid program under this section ends on the<br />

Dec. 1 following the actuarial valuation date on which<br />

the assets <strong>of</strong> the retirement plan on a market value<br />

basis equals or exceeds 90 percent <strong>of</strong> the total actuarial<br />

accrued liabilities <strong>of</strong> the retirement plan. Effective beginning<br />

in the fiscal year beginning July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Local Government Aid (LGA) reform. Sections 7<br />

through 18 (except section 13) and Section 36 amend<br />

Minn. Stat. § 477A and include the LGA reform proposal<br />

based on legislation introduced by Rep. Ben Lien (DFL-<br />

Moorhead) and Sen. Roger Reinert (DFL-Duluth). A<br />

detailed description <strong>of</strong> the new formula and a printout<br />

with the estimated 2014 LGA amounts for each city can<br />

be found in Appendix B at the back <strong>of</strong> this booklet.<br />

• New LGA formula. The LGA formula will now<br />

include a three-tier LGA need factor calculation<br />

depending on the population <strong>of</strong> the city, with separate<br />

“need” calculations for cities under 2,500 in population,<br />

cities between 2,500 and 10,000 in population,<br />

and cities over 10,000 in population. All three need<br />

formulas were derived using revenue base (levy plus<br />

aid) as a proxy for city need. The small city need calculation<br />

is based on a statistical analysis <strong>of</strong> the spending<br />

patterns <strong>of</strong> cities under 2,500 population, while<br />

the medium and large city need calculations are based<br />

on regression analysis <strong>of</strong> current fiscal and demographic<br />

data similar to the techniques used in previous<br />

LGA formulas. The new formula will reduce the<br />

annual volatility in the LGA distribution to individual<br />

cities by modifying the method used to allocate the<br />

annual appropriation increase. Under the new formula,<br />

no city will experience a reduction in LGA in 2014.<br />

Beginning with the 2015 distribution, roughly 90 cities<br />

would experience some reduction in their LGA<br />

distribution. However, the new formula will limit<br />

annual reductions to the lesser <strong>of</strong> $10 per capita or 5<br />

percent <strong>of</strong> the city’s previous year net levy. For cities<br />

that will gain under the new formula, those whose<br />

current LGA distribution is furthest from their unmet<br />

need will receive proportionally larger increases. The<br />

new formula also significantly simplifies the LGA system<br />

by eliminating several <strong>of</strong> the formula side pots.<br />

• City-specific adjustments. Section 16 provides for<br />

three city-specific aid adjustments from the formula.<br />

• Warroad. The City <strong>of</strong> Warroad will receive an extra<br />

$150,000 per year for the next five years to compensate<br />

for a major commercial property devaluation. The<br />

Warroad provision had been a permanent adjustment<br />

under the former LGA system but the adjustment will<br />

now sunset in five years.<br />

• Mahnomen. The City <strong>of</strong> Mahnomen will receive an<br />

extra annual LGA payment <strong>of</strong> $160,000 to compensate<br />

for tax base loss due to a casino being exempted<br />

under federal law.<br />

<strong>League</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>Cities</strong>


• Red Wing. The City <strong>of</strong> Red Wing will receive a refuge” as land owned in fee by another state agency for<br />

one-time additional payment <strong>of</strong> $1 million for 2014 military purposes and designated as a state game refuge<br />

only. The total LGA appropriation for 2014 was (this land is the Camp Ripley game refuge that currently<br />

receives a payment under Chapter 97A); a new<br />

increased to cover these additional distributions.<br />

• Disaster areas. Section 17 allows a city that is located definition <strong>of</strong> “transportation wetland” as land administered<br />

by the Department <strong>of</strong> Transportation in which the<br />

in a disaster area for an event that occurred in April <strong>2013</strong><br />

to get its entire <strong>2013</strong> LGA payment on July 20, <strong>2013</strong>. state acquired, by purchase from a private owner, a fee<br />

This provision covers cities in the counties <strong>of</strong> Rock, title interest in over 500 acres <strong>of</strong> land within a county to<br />

Nobles, Jackson, Murray, and Cottonwood.<br />

replace wetland losses from transportation projects; and<br />

• Total appropriation. Section 18 sets the total city aid “wildlife management land” as land administered by the<br />

appropriation at $507.6 million for aids payable in 2014, commissioner in which the state acquired, from a private<br />

$509.1 million for aids payable in 2015, and $511.6 million<br />

for aids payable in 2016 and thereafter.<br />

under the authority granted in Minn. Stat. ch. 94 (lands,<br />

owner by purchase, condemnation, or gift, a fee interest<br />

• Repealer. Section 36 repeals a number <strong>of</strong> current law state forests) or Minn. Stat. ch. 97A (game and fish) for<br />

provisions related to the existing LGA formula that are wildlife management purposes and actually used as a<br />

no longer used in the new distribution formula as well wildlife management area.<br />

several obsolete provisions related to aid reductions over Section 28 amends Minn. Stat. § 477A.12, subdivision<br />

1 to modify PILT payments as follows:<br />

the last several years.<br />

Section 17 is effective for aids payable in calendar year <strong>2013</strong>. All<br />

• Acquired natural resources land: $5.133, multiplied<br />

by the total number <strong>of</strong> acres or, at the county’s<br />

other LGA sections are effective for aids payable in calendar year<br />

2014 and thereafter.<br />

option, three-fourths <strong>of</strong> 1 percent <strong>of</strong> the appraised<br />

value <strong>of</strong> land in the county, whichever is greater (no<br />

• County program aid. Section 19 amends Minn. Stat. change);<br />

§ 477A.03 subd. 2b by increasing county program aid by • Transportation wetland: $5.133, multiplied by the<br />

$40 million per year for aids payable in 2014 and thereafter<br />

by increasing the appropriation for “need aid” and the county’s option, three-fourths <strong>of</strong> 1 percent <strong>of</strong> the<br />

total number <strong>of</strong> acres <strong>of</strong> transportation wetland, or, at<br />

“tax base equalization aid” each by $20 million. This appraised value <strong>of</strong> all acquired natural resources land<br />

section also makes technical language changes related to in the county, whichever is greater (similar to current<br />

payments for local impact notes. Effective for aids payable law);<br />

in calendar year 2014 and thereafter.<br />

• Wildlife management land: Three-fourths <strong>of</strong> 1<br />

• New township LGA. Sections 13 and 20 create new percent <strong>of</strong> the appraised value <strong>of</strong> all wildlife management<br />

land in the county (new provision);<br />

sections, Minn. Stat. § 477A.013, subd. 1 and 477A.03,<br />

subd. 2c, that establish a new township LGA system, and • Military refuge land: 50 percent <strong>of</strong> the dollar<br />

sets the town aid appropriation for aids payable in 2014 amount as determined under clause (1), multiplied<br />

and thereafter at $10 million. The township formula provides<br />

aid payments to townships equal to the product <strong>of</strong>: county (same as current payment in Chapter 97A);<br />

by the number <strong>of</strong> areas <strong>of</strong> military refuge land in the<br />

(1) its agricultural property factor; (2) its town area factor;<br />

(3) its population factor; and (4) 0.0045. If the sum number <strong>of</strong> acres <strong>of</strong> county-administered other natural<br />

• County-administered: $1.50 multiplied by the<br />

<strong>of</strong> all aids payable under this subdivision exceeds the resource land in the county (increased from $1.283/<br />

limit, the distribution to each township is reduced proportionately.<br />

Effective for aids payable in calendar year 2014 • Land utilization projects: $5.133 multiplied by the<br />

acre payment in current law);<br />

and thereafter.<br />

total number <strong>of</strong> acres <strong>of</strong> land utilization project land in<br />

• Minneapolis debt service aid. Section 21 creates a the county (increased from $1.23/ acre under current<br />

new section, Minn. Stat. § 477A.085, that requires the law);<br />

state to make annual payments to the City <strong>of</strong> Minneapolis<br />

equal to 40 percent <strong>of</strong> the annual levy for payments the total number <strong>of</strong> acres <strong>of</strong> commissioner-admin-<br />

• Commissioner-administered: $1.50 multiplied by<br />

for the city’s library referendum bonds, beginning in istered other natural resources land in the county<br />

2016. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

(increased from $0.642/acre under current law).<br />

• Payment in lieu <strong>of</strong> taxes (PILT) program. Sections • Local drainage assessments: Without regard to<br />

22 to 32 and section 36 amend various sections <strong>of</strong> Minn. acreage, $300,000 for local assessments under section<br />

Stat. ch. 477A related to the PILT program, including: 84A.55, subdivision 9 (new provision).<br />

the addition <strong>of</strong> a purpose statement for PILT; a variety<br />

Sections 22 through 32 are effective for aids payable in calendar<br />

<strong>of</strong> modifications to existing statutes to define “acquired<br />

year <strong>2013</strong> and thereafter.<br />

natural resources land” to specifically exclude “wildlife<br />

• Section 36 repeals the additional or alternative PILT<br />

management land;” a new definition <strong>of</strong> “military game<br />

payments in Chapter 97A for goose crop lands, public<br />

<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Summaries</strong> Page 49


hunting lands, and Camp Ripley game refuge, as well<br />

as a payment to Chisago County for land in St. Croix<br />

Wild River State Park under special law. Effective July<br />

1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Mahnomen County local government appropriations.<br />

Section 33 increases the annual aid appropriations<br />

to taxing jurisdictions in Mahnomen County from<br />

$600,000 to $1.2 million. The payments are as follows:<br />

$900,000 to Mahnomen County; $160,000 to the City<br />

<strong>of</strong> Mahnomen; and $140,000 to Independent School<br />

District No. 432, Mahnomen. Effective for aids payable in<br />

calendar year <strong>2013</strong> and thereafter.<br />

Article 3: Education provisions<br />

Article 3 includes several modifications to <strong>Minnesota</strong>’s<br />

education finance system that provide higher levels <strong>of</strong><br />

school district referendum equalization, allow $300 <strong>of</strong> referendum<br />

levy to be approved by the school board rather<br />

than the voters, and create a location equity revenue program<br />

for school districts in the seven-county metro area<br />

and outstate regional center districts. Various effective dates.<br />

Article 4: Property taxes<br />

• Board <strong>of</strong> Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) evaluation<br />

and report. Section 1 amends Minn. Stat. §<br />

103B.102, subd. 3 to extend the maximum amount <strong>of</strong><br />

time BWSR has to evaluate a local water management<br />

entity’s progress in accomplishing its plan from five years<br />

to 10 years, and allows the board to determine the frequency<br />

based on the budget and operations <strong>of</strong> the entity.<br />

Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Comprehensive watershed management plan<br />

tax levy authority. Section 2 amends Minn. Stat. §<br />

103B.335 to broaden tax levy authority by allowing a<br />

county, municipality, or township to levy for implementation<br />

funds for a comprehensive watershed management<br />

plan. This section also clarifies that counties may levy<br />

for the reasonable costs to soil and water conservation<br />

districts for administering and implementing programs<br />

identified in the plans. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Local water resources restoration, protection and<br />

management program financial assistance. Section<br />

3 amends Minn. Stat. § 103B.3369, subd. 5 to<br />

require a county that implements a water implementation<br />

tax to raise matching funds for base grants awarded<br />

by BWSR to levy at a rate that is sufficient to generate<br />

a minimum amount (to be determined by BWSR). This<br />

section also authorizes the use <strong>of</strong> funds raised by metropolitan<br />

county conservation fees (a $5 fee on mortgage<br />

and deed recordings/registrations) to be used as matching<br />

funds for the base grants and to address high-priority<br />

needs in local water management plans or comprehensive<br />

watershed management plans. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Cost-sharing conservation contracts for erosion<br />

control and water management. Section 4 amends<br />

Page 50<br />

Minn. Stat. § 103C.501, subd. 4 to eliminate cost-share<br />

fund allocation requirements that required 70 percent <strong>of</strong><br />

cost-share funds to be allocated to certain areas and no<br />

more than 20 percent to be allocated for technical and<br />

administrative assistances. This section also requires that<br />

funds for technical assistance be used to leverage federal<br />

or other non-state funds or address high-priority needs<br />

in local water management plans or comprehensive<br />

watershed management plans. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Soil loss ordinance authority. Section 5 amends<br />

Minn. Stat. § 103F.405, subd. 1 to allow soil loss ordinances<br />

adopted by counties, cities, and towns to use<br />

the soil loss tolerance for each soil type developed by<br />

BWSR, in addition to those in the United States National<br />

Resources Conservation Service Field Office Technical Guide,<br />

which is currently the only approved source. Soil loss<br />

tolerance is the maximum annual rate <strong>of</strong> soil loss by erosion<br />

that will permit crop productivity to be sustained.<br />

The soil loss ordinances must be consistent with a comprehensive<br />

plan, local water management plan, or watershed<br />

management plan. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Manufactured homes and park trailers. Section 6<br />

amends Minn. Stat. § 168.012, subd. 9 to exempt manufactured<br />

homes and park trailers from the motor vehicle<br />

registration tax and the personal property tax if the unit<br />

is held as inventory by a limited dealer. Under current<br />

law, the inventory exemption applies only to “licensed<br />

dealers.” Effective for taxes payable in 2014 and thereafter.<br />

• Manufactured home as dealer inventory. Section<br />

7 creates a new subdivision, Minn. Stat. § 168.012, that<br />

defines a manufactured home as dealer inventory if it is<br />

listed as inventory by a licensed or limited dealer, and is<br />

unoccupied and not available for rent. Under these conditions,<br />

it is considered part <strong>of</strong> dealer’s inventory even if<br />

it is permanently connected to utilities when located in<br />

a manufactured home park or temporarily connected to<br />

utilities when located at a dealer’s sales center. This section<br />

also puts a five-year limit on the time that an unoccupied<br />

home held in inventory is exempt. Effective for<br />

taxes payable in 2014 and thereafter.<br />

• State Board <strong>of</strong> Assessors; assessor sanctions. Section<br />

8 amends Minn. Stat. § 270.41, subd. 3 to provide<br />

that the state board <strong>of</strong> assessors may censure, warn, or<br />

fine an assessor in addition to their currently available<br />

possible sanctions <strong>of</strong> suspending, revoking, or refusing<br />

to grant a license. The new sanctions can also be applied<br />

against unlicensed assessors. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Report on disciplinary actions against assessors.<br />

Section 9 adds a new subdivision, Minn. Stat. § 270.41,<br />

that requires the state board <strong>of</strong> assessors to make a biannual<br />

report on the sanctions recommended by the<br />

commissioner <strong>of</strong> revenue under section 14, and the disposition<br />

<strong>of</strong> those recommendations by the board. Effective<br />

July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

<strong>League</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>Cities</strong>


• Disposition <strong>of</strong> assessor fines. Section 10 amends<br />

Minn. Stat. § 270.45 to provide that fines imposed under<br />

section 8 above must be deposited in the state’s general<br />

fund. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Assessor accreditation. Section 11 adds a new section,<br />

Minn. Stat. § 270C.9901, that requires that every<br />

individual who appraises or physically inspects property<br />

for property tax valuation or classification purposes<br />

must become licensed as an accredited assessor by July 1,<br />

2019, or by four years after becoming a licensed assessor,<br />

whichever is later. Effective Jan. 1, 2014.<br />

• Economic development holding period. Section<br />

12 amends Minn. Stat. § 272.02, subdivision 39 to<br />

increase the allowable tax exempt holding period for<br />

city-owned property awaiting development from nine<br />

years to 15 years under two conditions: (1) the property<br />

was acquired on or after Jan. 1, 2000, and on or before<br />

Dec. 31, 2010, regardless <strong>of</strong> geographic location, or (2)<br />

property is located in a city with a population under<br />

20,000 located outside the metro area. Under current<br />

law, the allowable holding period is 15 years for cities<br />

under 5,000 population located outside the metro area,<br />

and nine years for all other cities. Effective for assessment<br />

year <strong>2013</strong> and thereafter and for taxes payable in 2014 and<br />

thereafter.<br />

• Exemption for eligible property owned by Indian<br />

tribe. Section 13 adds a new subdivision, Minn. Stat. §<br />

272.02, subd. 98, that creates a property tax exemption<br />

for certain property located in Minneapolis owned by<br />

a federally recognized tribal government used for tribal<br />

government activities or services to members <strong>of</strong> the<br />

tribe. The exemption applies only to property used for<br />

noncommercial and nonresidential purposes and to no<br />

more than two contiguous parcels. The tax exemption<br />

expires with taxes payable in 2024. Effective beginning with<br />

taxes payable in 2014.<br />

• Electric generation facility property tax exemption.<br />

Section 14 amends Minn. Stat. § 272.02 to provide<br />

a property tax exemption for the personal property <strong>of</strong><br />

a new electric generation facility on which construction<br />

begins between June 1, <strong>2013</strong>, and June 1, 2017,<br />

that exceeds five megawatts <strong>of</strong> installed capacity, utilizes<br />

natural gas as a primary fuel, is owned and operated by<br />

a municipal power agency, is located within the service<br />

territory <strong>of</strong> a municipal power agency’s utility that<br />

serves a metropolitan county, and connects directly with<br />

a municipality’s substation.<br />

These facilities are planned for the cities <strong>of</strong> Anoka,<br />

Chaska, North St. Paul, and Shakopee. Effective for assessment<br />

year <strong>2013</strong>, taxes payable in 2014, and thereafter.<br />

• Commissioner review <strong>of</strong> assessment practices.<br />

Sections 15 and 16 amend Minn. Stat. § 273.061, subd. 2<br />

and Minn. Stat. § 273.0645 to provide that the commissioner<br />

<strong>of</strong> revenue may conduct investigations <strong>of</strong> assessor<br />

malfeasance, and make recommendations to the state<br />

board <strong>of</strong> assessors for appropriate sanctions.<br />

Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Conservation property tax valuation. Section 17<br />

amends Minn. Stat. § 273.117 to provide that the value<br />

<strong>of</strong> real property subject to a conservation restriction<br />

or easement shall not be reduced by the assessor if the<br />

restriction is for a conservation purpose and the property<br />

is being used in accordance with the restriction. This<br />

section also clarifies that this section does not apply to<br />

restrictions or easements covering riparian buffers along<br />

lakes, rivers, and streams that are used for water quantity<br />

or quality control, or to easements granted by a county<br />

that has adopted a program by referendum to protect<br />

farmland and natural areas since 1999. Effective for assessment<br />

year <strong>2013</strong> and thereafter, and for taxes payable in 2014<br />

and thereafter.<br />

• Class 4d (low-income rental housing) property.<br />

Section 18 amends Minn. Stat. § 273.13, subd. 25 to provide<br />

for a reduced class rate <strong>of</strong> 0.25 percent for class 4d<br />

property over $100,000 in value per housing unit. Currently<br />

the entire 4d class is subject to a class rate <strong>of</strong> 0.75<br />

percent. This section also provides for indexing <strong>of</strong> the<br />

tier bracket based on the statewide average growth rate<br />

for apartment property values and makes several technical<br />

modifications. Effective beginning with assessment year<br />

2014 for taxes payable in 2015.<br />

• Federal active service late property tax payment<br />

exception. Sections 19 and 20 amend Minn. Stat. §<br />

279.01, subd. 1 and add a subdivision, Minn. Stat. §<br />

279.01, subd. 5, that grant a four-month grace period for<br />

complying with the property tax due dates for homestead<br />

property owned by an individual who is on federal<br />

active service. Section 20 also specifies that no late fees<br />

or penalties may be assessed during this period and the<br />

taxpayer must also provide pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> the dates <strong>of</strong> active<br />

federal service at the time <strong>of</strong> payment. Effective July 1,<br />

<strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Active federal service; delinquent homestead<br />

property taxes. Section 21 amends Minn. Stat. §<br />

279.02 to provides that property owned by an individual<br />

who is on active federal service on the property tax<br />

due date shall not be deemed delinquent. Effective July 1,<br />

<strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Confessions <strong>of</strong> judgment for commercial, industrial,<br />

and utility real and personal property. Section<br />

22 amends Minn. Stat. § 279.37, subd.1a to remove<br />

the value cap <strong>of</strong> $500,000 for class 3a property (commercial,<br />

industrial, and utility real and personal property<br />

) eligible for a confession <strong>of</strong> judgment, and adds an<br />

approval requirement by the county auditor. This section<br />

also allows assessment authorities or municipalities<br />

to waive or abate repayment <strong>of</strong> a portion <strong>of</strong> special<br />

assessments. The county auditor may require conditions<br />

including, but not limited to, environmental remediation<br />

when considering eligibility. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Summaries</strong> Page 51


• Confessions <strong>of</strong> judgment installment payments.<br />

Section 23 amends Minn. Stat. § 279.37, subd. 2 to<br />

adjust amount and number <strong>of</strong> payments under confessions<br />

<strong>of</strong> judgment by allowing an initial payment <strong>of</strong><br />

one-fifth the amount and four equal, annual installments.<br />

Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Expiration <strong>of</strong> time for redemption. Section 24<br />

amends Minn. Stat. § 281.14 to conform a cross-reference<br />

for redemption periods. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Redemption period for homestead and seasonal,<br />

residential, recreation land. Section 25 amends<br />

Minn. Stat. § 281.17 to remove the five-year period for<br />

redemption for homestead or seasonal residential recreational<br />

land. This has the effect <strong>of</strong> instituting a three-year<br />

redemption period for most properties. Effective July 1,<br />

<strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Hennepin and Ramsey counties mortgage registry<br />

tax authorization. Section 26 amends Minn.<br />

Stat. § 287.05 to codify the authority for Hennepin and<br />

Ramsey counties to levy an additional mortgage registry<br />

tax in the statute governing mortgage registry taxes.<br />

Effective for deeds and mortgages acknowledged on or after July<br />

1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Hennepin and Ramsey counties deed tax authorization.<br />

Section 27 adds a new section, Minn. Stat.<br />

287.40, that codifies the authority for Hennepin and<br />

Ramsey counties to levy an additional deed tax. Effective<br />

for deeds and mortgages acknowledged on or after July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Ramsey County mortgage registry and deed tax<br />

expiration. Section 28 amends Minn. Stat.§ 383A.80,<br />

subdivision 4 to extend the Ramsey County authority<br />

to levy additional mortgage registry and deed taxes by<br />

15 years to Jan. 1, 2028. Effective for all deeds and mortgages<br />

acknowledged on or after July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Hennepin County mortgage registry and deed tax<br />

expiration. Section 29 amends Minn. Stat. § 383B.80,<br />

subdivision 4 to extend the Hennepin County authority<br />

to levy additional mortgage registry and deed taxes by<br />

15 years to Jan. 1, 2028. Effective for all deeds and mortgages<br />

acknowledged on or after July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Special service district authorization extended.<br />

Section 30 amends Minn. Stat. § 428A.101 to extend<br />

city authority to establish new special service districts<br />

without special authorization by 15 years to June 30,<br />

2028. Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Housing improvement district authorization<br />

extended. Section 31 amends Minn. Stat § 428A.21 to<br />

extend city authority to establish new housing improvement<br />

districts without special authorization by 15 years<br />

to June 30, 2028. Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Bloomington fiscal disparities repayment computation.<br />

Section 32 amends Minn. Stat § 473F.08,<br />

subdivision 3a to relieve Bloomington <strong>of</strong> its obligation<br />

to repay a loan it received from the metropolitan fiscal<br />

disparities pool for infrastructure improvements related<br />

Page 52<br />

to the Mall <strong>of</strong> America in the late 1980s and 1990s. This<br />

provision relieves the City <strong>of</strong> the last four years <strong>of</strong> repayment,<br />

2015-2018. The state will make the extra payments<br />

to the pool for those four years. Effective beginning<br />

with taxes payable in 2015.<br />

• Cook-Orr Hospital District. Section 33 amends <strong>Law</strong>s<br />

1988, chapter 645, section 3, as amended most recently by<br />

<strong>Law</strong>s 2008, chapter 154, article 2, section 30, to allow the<br />

Cook-Orr Hospital District levy to be used to purchase<br />

equipment, parts, and replacement parts for ambulances,<br />

in addition to the existing authority to purchase ambulances.<br />

The proceeds <strong>of</strong> the levy must be divided equally<br />

between the Cook and Orr ambulance services. Effective<br />

July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Northwest <strong>Minnesota</strong> Housing and Redevelopment<br />

Authority levy authority. Section 35 amends<br />

<strong>Law</strong>s 2008, chapter 366, article 5, section 33, (the effective<br />

date) to extend the authority <strong>of</strong> the Northwest<br />

<strong>Minnesota</strong> Multicounty Housing and Redevelopment<br />

Authority to levy up to 25 percent <strong>of</strong> its total levy<br />

authority on its own by five years, through taxes payable<br />

in 2018. Effective beginning with taxes payable in 2014.<br />

• Cloquet area fire and ambulance taxing district<br />

agreement. Section 36 amends <strong>Law</strong>s 2009, chapter 88,<br />

article 2, section 46, subdivision 1 to allow municipalities<br />

that are non-contiguous to current member-municipalities<br />

to join the district. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Cloquet area fire and ambulance taxing district<br />

tax. Section 37 amends <strong>Law</strong>s 2009, chapter 88, article 2,<br />

section 46, subdivision 3 to require the district board to<br />

determine the amount <strong>of</strong> the levy attributable to fire and<br />

ambulance services. Costs <strong>of</strong> ambulance services shall be<br />

levied at a rate not to exceed 0.019 percent <strong>of</strong> estimated<br />

market value and for municipalities that receive both fire<br />

and ambulance services the levy shall be at a rate not to<br />

exceed 0.2835 percent. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Marshall County farm homesteads. Section 38<br />

amends <strong>Law</strong>s 2010, chapter 389, article 1, section 12,<br />

(the effective date) to allow farmers in Marshall County<br />

who were forced to move away from their farms due<br />

to flooding in 2009 to continue to receive agricultural<br />

homestead classification on the farmland indefinitely,<br />

provided they continue to reside in <strong>Minnesota</strong> within 50<br />

miles <strong>of</strong> the land. This provision was originally adopted<br />

in 2010 on a temporary (two-year) basis. Effective for<br />

assessment year 2012 and thereafter.<br />

• Entertainment facilities coordination study. Section<br />

39 is an uncodified session law that requires the<br />

cities <strong>of</strong> Minneapolis and St. Paul to report to the Legislature<br />

by Feb. 1, 2014, their study <strong>of</strong> providing a joint<br />

governing structure for the arenas in the two cities. This<br />

section also requires the commissioner <strong>of</strong> administration<br />

to contract with a consultant to conduct all or a portion<br />

<strong>of</strong> the study, requires the two cities to each pay onehalf<br />

<strong>of</strong> the cost <strong>of</strong> the study, and provides a general fund<br />

<strong>League</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>Cities</strong>


appropriation <strong>of</strong> $50,000 to the commissioner <strong>of</strong> administration<br />

to pay up to one-half <strong>of</strong> the cost <strong>of</strong> the consultant<br />

contract. Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Reimbursement for tax abatements. Section 40<br />

amends <strong>Law</strong>s 2011, First Special Session chapter 7, article<br />

5, section 13 to require the commissioner <strong>of</strong> revenue<br />

to reimburse taxing jurisdictions for property tax abatements<br />

granted because <strong>of</strong> a tornado that damaged parts<br />

<strong>of</strong> Minneapolis and other parts <strong>of</strong> the northern metro<br />

area in 2011. The state authorized these abatements<br />

including state reimbursements in the 2011 tax bill, but<br />

Hennepin County’s request for reimbursements was submitted<br />

after the deadline in the legislation. Effective May<br />

24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• St. Paul Saints stadium property tax exemption.<br />

Section 41 is an uncodified session law that grants a<br />

property tax exemption for a city-owned baseball stadium<br />

primarily used by a minor league team. The stadium<br />

remains subject to special assessments. Effective the<br />

day after compliance by the governing body <strong>of</strong> the City <strong>of</strong> St.<br />

Paul with <strong>Minnesota</strong> Statutes, section 645.021, subdivisions<br />

2 and 3.<br />

• Target Center property tax exemption. Section<br />

42 is an uncodified session law that provides a property<br />

tax exemption for the Target Center. The exemption<br />

does not apply to any portion <strong>of</strong> the facility leased<br />

for business purposes unrelated to the operation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

arena, including a restaurant open more than 200 days a<br />

year. Effective the day after compliance by the governing body<br />

<strong>of</strong> the City <strong>of</strong> Minneapolis with <strong>Minnesota</strong> Statutes, section<br />

645.021, subds 2 and 3.<br />

• Public entertainment facility; construction manager<br />

at risk. Section 43 is an uncodified session law<br />

that allows the City <strong>of</strong> Minneapolis to contract with<br />

persons, firms, or corporations to perform projects to<br />

renovate, refurbish and remodel the Target Center under<br />

either the traditional design-bid-build or construction<br />

manager at risk, or a combination there<strong>of</strong>. Effective the<br />

day after compliance by the governing body <strong>of</strong> the City <strong>of</strong> Minneapolis<br />

with <strong>Minnesota</strong> Statutes, section 645.021, subds 2<br />

and 3.<br />

• Extension <strong>of</strong> property tax due date for resorts.<br />

Section 44 is an uncodified session law that extends the<br />

time resort owners and other seasonal business owners<br />

have to pay their first half property taxes by two weeks,<br />

from May 31 to June 14, for taxes payable in <strong>2013</strong> only.<br />

Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Report on tier structure for 4d class (low-income<br />

rental housing). Section 45 is an uncodified session<br />

law that requires the commissioners <strong>of</strong> revenue and the<br />

housing finance agency to report to the Legislature by<br />

Jan. 31, 2015, on the effect <strong>of</strong> the changes to the class 4d<br />

(low-income rental housing) tier structure found in section<br />

18 above. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Study and report on production property; moratorium<br />

on assessment changes. Section 46 is an<br />

uncodified session law that requires the commissioner<br />

<strong>of</strong> revenue to study the assessment <strong>of</strong> property used in<br />

the production <strong>of</strong> bi<strong>of</strong>uels and other industries that use<br />

similar types <strong>of</strong> equipment, and report the findings <strong>of</strong><br />

the study to the Legislature by Feb. 1, 2014. This section<br />

also prohibits assessors from changing current assessment<br />

practices with regard to the taxable status <strong>of</strong> property<br />

used in the production <strong>of</strong> bi<strong>of</strong>uels and other industries<br />

that use similar types <strong>of</strong> equipment, for taxes payable in<br />

2014 and 2015 only. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Property tax savings report. Section 47 is an uncodified<br />

session law that requires all counties and each city<br />

with a population over 500 to include along with its<br />

certification <strong>of</strong> its proposed levy, the amount <strong>of</strong> sales and<br />

use tax paid or estimated to have been paid in 2012. This<br />

section also requires the proposed tax notice to include<br />

a separate statement providing a list <strong>of</strong> sales and use taxes<br />

certified by the county and cities. At the fall public tax<br />

hearing, the county or the city must discuss the savings<br />

as a result <strong>of</strong> the sales tax exemption for cities and counties<br />

provided in Article 8 <strong>of</strong> Chapter 143. Effective for<br />

notices for taxes payable in 2014 only. Effective May 24,<br />

<strong>2013</strong>, for taxes levied in <strong>2013</strong> and payable in 2014.<br />

• Levy limits for taxes levied in <strong>2013</strong>. Section 48 is<br />

an uncodified session law that establishes a levy limit for<br />

taxes payable in 2014 only for all counties over 5,000<br />

population and all cities over 2,500 population. The<br />

levy limit base is the certified levy minus allowable special<br />

levies (generally for debt service, natural disasters<br />

and abatements) plus the certified LGA for taxes payable<br />

in 2012 or <strong>2013</strong>, whichever is greater, increased by<br />

3 percent. The levy limit is the levy limit base minus the<br />

certified LGA for 2014. In no case may the levy limit be<br />

less than the certified levy for taxes payable in 2012 or<br />

<strong>2013</strong>, whichever is greater. In addition to the allowable<br />

levy limit, cities can additionally levy for allowable special<br />

levies (generally for debt service, natural disasters and<br />

abatements and levies approved by voters that are applied<br />

to referendum market value). For more information on<br />

the levy limit, please see Appendix A. (Note: The allowable<br />

special levies were amended in the corrections bill,<br />

Chapter 144, section 18.) Effective for taxes levied in <strong>2013</strong>,<br />

payable in 2014, only.<br />

• City <strong>of</strong> Moose Lake state facility grant. Section 49<br />

is an uncodified session law that appropriates $2 million<br />

in FY 2014 for a grant to the City <strong>of</strong> Moose Lake<br />

for reimbursement for payments related to connection <strong>of</strong><br />

state facilities to a sewer line. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

Article 5: Special taxes<br />

This article makes changes in various special taxes including.<br />

Article 5 modifies and increases to tobacco taxes;<br />

repeals the health impact fee and fund and replaces it with<br />

<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Summaries</strong> Page 53


an increase in the regular tobacco excise tax; makes changes<br />

to the taxes imposed on jet fuels as well as aircraft in lieu<br />

taxes; and directs that some <strong>of</strong> the revenues raised under the<br />

jet fuel provisions are deposited into the state airports fund.<br />

• Revenues from aircraft sales deposited in state<br />

airports fund. Section 5 amends Minn. Stat. § 297A.82<br />

to require that any tax collected from the sale or purchase<br />

<strong>of</strong> an aircraft taxable under chapter 297A is to be<br />

deposited in the state airports fund established in Minn.<br />

Stat. § 360.017. These funds, estimated to be $2.9 million<br />

per year, were previously deposited in the state general<br />

fund. Effective on July 1, 2014 and applied to sales and purchases<br />

made on or after that date.<br />

• <strong>Law</strong>ful gambling-raffle drawings without<br />

registering. Section 21 amends Minn. Stat. § 349.166,<br />

subd. 1 to expand the ability for organizations to<br />

conduct raffle drawings without registering with the<br />

<strong>Minnesota</strong> Gambling Control Board. Under current<br />

law, an organization does not need to register if the<br />

organization does not annually award more than $1,500<br />

in prizes. Under this section, the registration exclusion is<br />

expanded to allow a 501(c)(3) organization to conduct<br />

a raffle without registering if the organization does not<br />

award more than $5,000 at an event in the calendar year.<br />

Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

Article 6: Individual income and corporate franchise taxes<br />

• Greater <strong>Minnesota</strong> internship program. Sections 4<br />

adds a new section, Minn. Stat. § 136A.129, and Section<br />

12 amends Minn. Stat. § 290.06, to establish an<br />

internship program for students at <strong>Minnesota</strong> public,<br />

post-secondary institutions, or a baccalaureate degree<br />

granting nonpr<strong>of</strong>it <strong>Minnesota</strong> institution, to be administered<br />

by the Office <strong>of</strong> Higher Education. The goal <strong>of</strong><br />

the program is to connect students with non-metro area<br />

<strong>Minnesota</strong> employers for permanent employment in<br />

Greater <strong>Minnesota</strong>. The internship must be at a place <strong>of</strong><br />

employment in Greater <strong>Minnesota</strong> (outside <strong>of</strong> the counties<br />

<strong>of</strong> Anoka, Carver, Chisago, Dakota, Hennepin, Isanti,<br />

Ramsey, Scott, Sherburne, Washington, and Wright).<br />

Employers are eligible for an income tax credit. Effective<br />

for taxable years beginning after Dec. 31, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Historic structure rehabilitation credit. Sections 17<br />

through 20 and Section 32 extend the historic structure<br />

rehabilitation credit sunset and makes various changes to<br />

the program:<br />

• Section 16 amends Minn. Stat § 290.0681, subd.1,<br />

defining “federal credit” as the federal historic structure<br />

rehabilitation credit, and the terms “placed in<br />

service” and “qualified rehabilitation expenditures,”<br />

to have the meanings given in the Internal Revenue<br />

Code for the federal credit. Effective the day following<br />

final enactment.<br />

• Section 17 amends Minn. Stat. § 290.0681, subd. 3<br />

to authorize the State Historic Preservation Office<br />

Page 54<br />

(SHPO) <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Minnesota</strong> Historical Society to<br />

collect up to 0.5 percent <strong>of</strong> estimated qualified<br />

rehabilitation expenditures, up to a maximum <strong>of</strong><br />

$40,000, as an application fee for a project. Prior<br />

to this change, the law limited the application fee,<br />

which is used to <strong>of</strong>fset the costs <strong>of</strong> administering the<br />

credit and preparing reports, to $5,000. This section<br />

also requires the SHPO to notify the developer in<br />

writing if a project is eligible for a credit. This section<br />

allows determinations <strong>of</strong> the SHPO regarding project<br />

eligibility for the historic credit to be appealed<br />

through a contested case procedure under Minn. Stat.<br />

ch. 14, within 45 days <strong>of</strong> the written notification.<br />

Effective the day following final enactment, except the fee<br />

increase applies to applications first received on or after the<br />

day following final enactment.<br />

• Section 18 amends Minn. Stat. § 290.0681, subd. 4<br />

to allow grant agreements to provide for grants to<br />

be issued to an individual or entity other than the<br />

developer. This section also requires entities that are<br />

assigned a credit certificate to notify the commissioner<br />

within 30 days <strong>of</strong> being assigned a credit, in a<br />

form and manner prescribed by the commissioner, and<br />

clarifies that the pass-through <strong>of</strong> credits to owners <strong>of</strong> a<br />

pass-through entity are not considered credit assignments.<br />

Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Section 19 amends Minn. Stat. § 290.0681, subd. 5<br />

to allow entities with multiple owners to allocate the<br />

credit among owners based on an “executed agreement.”<br />

Current law allows allocation <strong>of</strong> the credit<br />

either based on the ownership <strong>of</strong> the entity’s assets, or<br />

as specified in the entity’s organizational documents.<br />

Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Section 20 amends Minn. Stat. § 290.0681, subd. 10 to<br />

extend the availability <strong>of</strong> the historic structure rehabilitation<br />

credit from June 30, 2015 to June 30, 2021.<br />

Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Section 32 amends <strong>Law</strong>s 2010, chapter 216, section<br />

11 (the effective date), to make the credit effective for<br />

rehabilitation expenditures first paid by the developer<br />

or taxpayer after May 1, 2010, and for rehabilitation<br />

that occurs after May 1, 2010, provided that the<br />

application submitted for credit eligibility is submitted<br />

before the project is placed in service. Effective May 24,<br />

<strong>2013</strong>, and applies retroactively for certified historic structures<br />

placed in service after May 1, 2010, but no credit certificates<br />

allowed under the change to this effective date clarification<br />

may be issued until July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

Article 8: Sales and use tax; local sales taxes<br />

• Sales tax exemption for qualified Greater <strong>Minnesota</strong><br />

business expansions. Section 1 adds a new<br />

section, Minn. Stat. § 116J.3738, and Section 28 adds a<br />

new subdivision, Minn. Stat. § 297A.68, Subd. 49, that<br />

together provide for a sales tax exemption for qualify-<br />

<strong>League</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>Cities</strong>


ing Greater <strong>Minnesota</strong> businesses. A qualified business is<br />

defines as a business that:<br />

• Has operated in Greater <strong>Minnesota</strong> for at least one<br />

year before applying for certification;<br />

• Pays or agrees to pay its employees compensation <strong>of</strong> at<br />

least 120 percent <strong>of</strong> the federal poverty line for a family<br />

four not including benefits mandated by law;<br />

• Plans and agrees to expand its employment in Greater<br />

<strong>Minnesota</strong> by a minimum number <strong>of</strong> employees; and<br />

• Receives qualification from the commissioner <strong>of</strong><br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Employment and Economic Development<br />

(DEED) as a qualified business.<br />

Public utilities and retail employers that are primarily<br />

engaged in selling to purchasers physically present at<br />

the business’s location are ineligible.<br />

The business must apply to the commissioner <strong>of</strong><br />

DEED for certification as a qualified business. A copy <strong>of</strong><br />

the application must also be filed with the chief clerical<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficer <strong>of</strong> the city, or the county auditor if located<br />

outside a city. DEED must determine that the business<br />

would not expand its operations in Greater <strong>Minnesota</strong><br />

without the sales tax exemption and the business must<br />

enter into a business subsidy agreement with DEED that<br />

will satisfy minimum expansion requirements within<br />

three years <strong>of</strong> execution <strong>of</strong> the agreement. The city or<br />

county in which a business or agricultural processing<br />

facility proposes to expand may file support or opposition<br />

to the certification with DEED. Certification is<br />

valid for 12 years beginning the first day <strong>of</strong> the calendar<br />

month following execution <strong>of</strong> the business subsidy<br />

agreement. The minimum expansion requirements, based<br />

on the number <strong>of</strong> employees in Greater <strong>Minnesota</strong> at<br />

the time <strong>of</strong> execution <strong>of</strong> the agreement, are:<br />

• 50 or fewer FTEs: must increase by five or more FTEs.<br />

• 51-199 FTEs: must increase FTEs by at least 10 percent.<br />

• 200 or more FTEs: must increase by at least 21 FTEs.<br />

The certified businesses must meet the minimum<br />

expansion requirements within three years <strong>of</strong> entering<br />

the business subsidy agreement and continue to satisfy<br />

the requirements for the duration <strong>of</strong> the certification<br />

period. A business would cease to be a qualified business<br />

at the end <strong>of</strong> its certification period or the date the commissioner<br />

finds that the business failed to meet its minimum<br />

expansion requirements. The commissioner may<br />

waive a breach <strong>of</strong> the certification agreement after consulting<br />

with the commissioner <strong>of</strong> revenue if the breach is<br />

the result <strong>of</strong> natural disaster, unforeseen industry trends,<br />

an overall decline in the statewide or Greater <strong>Minnesota</strong><br />

economy, or the loss <strong>of</strong> a major supplier or customer.<br />

Section 28 provides an upfront sales tax exemption<br />

for purchases <strong>of</strong> tangible personal property and taxable<br />

services purchased by a qualified business if the exemption<br />

is provided for in the business subsidy agreement<br />

under Section 1 above. The property or services must<br />

be primarily used or consumed in Greater <strong>Minnesota</strong><br />

and the purchase must have been made, and delivery<br />

received, during the certification period.<br />

Purchase and use <strong>of</strong> construction materials used or<br />

consumed in, and equipment incorporated into, the construction<br />

<strong>of</strong> improvements to real property in Greater<br />

<strong>Minnesota</strong> are exempt if the improvements are used<br />

in the conduct <strong>of</strong> the trade or business <strong>of</strong> the qualified<br />

business. The exemption applies for state and local sales<br />

and use taxes. The allocations to all qualifying businesses<br />

may not exceed $7 million in a fiscal year, but any qualifying<br />

claims not paid in one year are available in subsequent<br />

years. Unused amounts may be carried forward<br />

and used for refunds in future years. Section 1 is effective<br />

May 24, <strong>2013</strong>, and Section 28 is effective for sales and purchases<br />

made after June 30, 2014.<br />

• Definition <strong>of</strong> retail sale. Section 3 amends Minn.<br />

Stat § 297A.61, subd. 4 to clarify that payments made<br />

to electric utilities and cooperatives as a contribution in<br />

aid <strong>of</strong> construction is a contract for improvement to real<br />

property and not a taxable sale. Effective for sales, purchases,<br />

and leases entered after June 30, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Sales tax collection responsibility for retailer not<br />

maintaining place <strong>of</strong> business in <strong>Minnesota</strong>. Section<br />

18 amends Minn. Stat. § 297A.66, subd. 3 to clarify<br />

that a remote seller must collect and remit the state sales<br />

tax in accordance with any federal remote seller law. If<br />

the Main Street Fairness Act now before Congress is<br />

enacted into law, this change will allow <strong>Minnesota</strong> to<br />

impose the duty to collect the sales tax on remote sellers.<br />

Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Solicitor nexus. Section 19 adds a subdivision to<br />

Minn. Stat. § 297A.66, subd. 4a, that provides a definition<br />

<strong>of</strong> “solicitor,” which includes residents in the state<br />

who directly or indirectly refer potential customers to a<br />

seller through website or similar link for a commission<br />

or other consideration.<br />

The presumption is that a retailer without a physical<br />

presence in <strong>Minnesota</strong> has nexus if the total receipts<br />

<strong>of</strong> sales to <strong>Minnesota</strong> customers generated by Internet<br />

referrals made through websites operated by <strong>Minnesota</strong><br />

residents exceed $10,000 in the last 12-month period. A<br />

rebuttal process to this presumption is provided. Effective<br />

for sales and purchases made after June 30, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Capital equipment up-front exemption. Section<br />

26 amends Minn. Stat. § 297A.68, subd. 5 to eliminate<br />

the requirement that the sales tax on capital equipment<br />

purchases be paid at the time <strong>of</strong> purchase and refunded<br />

as provided in statute. Effective for sales and purchases made<br />

after Aug. 31, 2014.<br />

• Qualified data centers. Section 27 amends Minn. Stat.<br />

§ 297A.68, subd. 42 to modify the sales tax exemption<br />

for data centers by adding “refurbished data centers” and<br />

modifying the qualifications as follows:<br />

• Reduces the investment requirement from $50 million in<br />

24-month period to $30 million in a 48-month period.<br />

<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Summaries</strong> Page 55


• Reduces the minimum square footage requirement <strong>of</strong><br />

the building housing the data center from 30,000 to<br />

25,000 square feet.<br />

• Reduces the amount <strong>of</strong> space that must be “substantially<br />

refurbished” for building the data center from<br />

30,000 square feet to 25,000 square feet.<br />

• Defines “substantially refurbished” to retain the<br />

requirement <strong>of</strong> $50 million in investment within 24<br />

months.<br />

• Specifies that “computer s<strong>of</strong>tware” included in calculating<br />

investment includes the maintenance, licensing,<br />

and customization <strong>of</strong> the s<strong>of</strong>tware.<br />

Effective for sales and purchases made after June 30, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• City and county exemption from the state sales<br />

tax. Section 29 amends Minn. Stat. § 297A.70, subd. 2<br />

to add cities and counties to the list <strong>of</strong> purchasers eligible<br />

for a sales tax exemption on qualifying purchases.<br />

Purchases by cities, counties, and townships were subjected<br />

to the state sales tax beginning in 1992. Townships<br />

were exempted under a change enacted in 2011. This<br />

provision does not exempt purchases <strong>of</strong> goods or services<br />

used as inputs to goods and services generally provided<br />

by a private business, such as those provided by liquor<br />

stores, utilities, golf courses, marinas, health and fitness<br />

centers, campgrounds, cafes, and laundromats. Goods<br />

and services generally provided by a private business do<br />

not include housing services, sewer and water services,<br />

wastewater treatment, ambulance and other public safety<br />

services, correctional services, core or homemaking services<br />

provided to elderly or disabled individuals, or road<br />

and street maintenance or lighting. Effective for sales and<br />

purchases made after Dec. 31, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Nursing homes and boarding care homes. Section<br />

36 amends Minn. Stat. § 297A.70 to provide a sales tax<br />

exemption for most purchases by a nursing home or a<br />

boarding care facility. To qualify:<br />

• The nursing home must be licensed by the state, and<br />

the boarding care home must be certified as a nursing<br />

facility under federal law.<br />

• Be an exempt 501(c)(3) entity.<br />

• Either be certified to participate in the medical assistance<br />

program, or certify to the commissioner <strong>of</strong> revenue<br />

that it does not discharge residents due to inability<br />

to pay.<br />

The exemption does not apply to certain construction<br />

materials, lodging, prepared food and drink, and<br />

leased vehicles not used to transport residents and property<br />

to the facility. Effective for sales made after June 30,<br />

<strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Biopharmaceutical manufacturing facility sales<br />

tax exemption. Section 37 adds a subdivision to Minn.<br />

Stat. § 297A.71, subd. 45 to provide a sales tax exemption<br />

for materials, supplies, and capital equipment incorporated<br />

into construction, improvement, or expansion <strong>of</strong><br />

Page 56<br />

a biopharmaceutical manufacturing facility if the facility<br />

meets the following conditions:<br />

• It manufactures biologics.<br />

• It makes a total capital investment <strong>of</strong> at least $50 million.<br />

• The facility creates and maintains 190 new FTE<br />

employees in the state.<br />

• The Department <strong>of</strong> Employment and Economic<br />

Development determines that the project meets<br />

these requirement in each year in which a refund is<br />

requested.<br />

The known qualifying project is related to a business<br />

location in the City <strong>of</strong> Brooklyn Park. The exemption<br />

also applies to materials used in privately owned infrastructure<br />

needed to support the facility. The tax is owed<br />

at the time <strong>of</strong> purchase, and the owner <strong>of</strong> the facility<br />

may apply for a refund. The refund is metered out so that<br />

25 percent <strong>of</strong> the total allowable refund to date is paid<br />

annually. Effective retroactively to investments entered into and<br />

jobs created after Dec. 31, 2012, and before July 1, 2019.<br />

• Research and development facility sales tax<br />

exemption. Section 38 adds a subdivision to Minn. Stat.<br />

§ 297A.71, subd 46 to exempt materials and supplies<br />

used or consumed in, and equipment incorporated into,<br />

the construction or improvement <strong>of</strong> a qualifying research<br />

and development facility. The facility must have laboratory<br />

space <strong>of</strong> at least 400,000 square feet, utilize high<br />

and low-intensity laboratories, and have a total construction<br />

cost <strong>of</strong> at least $140 million in a 24-month period.<br />

The known qualifying project is related to a business in<br />

Maplewood. Effective for sales and purchases made after June<br />

30, <strong>2013</strong> and before Sept. 1, 2015.<br />

• Industrial measurement manufacturing and controls<br />

facility. Section 39 adds a subdivision to Minn.<br />

Stat. § 297A.71, subd 47 to provide a sales tax exemption<br />

for materials, supplies, capital equipment, and fixtures in<br />

construction, improvement, or expansion <strong>of</strong> an industrial<br />

measurement manufacturing and controls facility if the<br />

facility meets the following conditions:<br />

• Total capital investment <strong>of</strong> at least $60 million.<br />

• Employs 250 new FTE employees in the state.<br />

• The Department <strong>of</strong> Employment and Economic<br />

Development determines that the project has a significant<br />

impact on the state economy.<br />

The exemption also applies to materials used in<br />

privately owned infrastructure needed to support the<br />

facility. The tax is owed at the time <strong>of</strong> purchase and the<br />

owner <strong>of</strong> the facility may apply for a refund. The known<br />

qualifying project is related to a business in Shakopee.<br />

Effective for sales and purchases after June 30, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Tax collected and refunds for specific projects.<br />

Sections 40 and 41 amend Minn. Stat. § 297A.75, subd. 1<br />

and Minn. Stat.§ 297A.75, subdivision 2 to provide that<br />

the purchasers <strong>of</strong> construction materials and equipment<br />

granted an exemption under sections 37 to 39 above<br />

may pay the tax and apply for a refund <strong>of</strong> sales taxes paid.<br />

<strong>League</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>Cities</strong>


Section 40 is effective for sales and purchases made after June • Removes the requirement that the tax in subdivision<br />

30, <strong>2013</strong>. Section 41 is effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

1a expires when the proceeds are sufficient to pay the<br />

• Application for refund for specific projects. Section<br />

42 amends Minn. Stat. § 297A.75, subd. 3 to pro-<br />

choose to repeal the tax any time after that time.<br />

bonds in subdivision 2a; however, it allows the city to<br />

vide that subcontractors and contractors must provide Effective the day after the governing body <strong>of</strong> the City <strong>of</strong> Rochester<br />

and its chief fiscal <strong>of</strong>ficer comply with Minn. Stat.§<br />

information to the facility owner on taxes paid on<br />

construction materials exempt under Sections 37 to 39 645.021, subdivisions 2 and 3.<br />

above to allow the owners to apply for a refund. The<br />

• Central <strong>Minnesota</strong> cities; use <strong>of</strong> sales tax revenues<br />

owner <strong>of</strong> the biopharmaceutical manufacturing facility<br />

and termination <strong>of</strong> tax. Section 47 amends <strong>Law</strong>s<br />

under section 37 may not apply for a refund until after<br />

2005, First Special Session chapter 3, article 5, section 37,<br />

June 30, 2016, and may only file one refund application<br />

per year. Also updates a cross reference related to<br />

subdivision 2 to modify one <strong>of</strong> the existing allowed uses<br />

<strong>of</strong> the sales tax in the City <strong>of</strong> St. Cloud to limit funding<br />

to regional community and aquatic centers. Section<br />

the repeal <strong>of</strong> the capital equipment sales tax collection<br />

requirement. Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

48 amends <strong>Law</strong>s 2005, First Special Session chapter 3,<br />

• Local sales tax referenda; authorized expenditures.<br />

Section 43 amends Minn. Stat. § 297A.99, subd.<br />

article 5, section 37, subdivision 4 to allow each city (St.<br />

Joseph, Sartell, Waite Park, Sauk Rapids, and St. Augusta)<br />

1 to authorize political subdivisions to expend funds<br />

to extend the tax in its community from 2018 to 2038,<br />

to disseminate information included in a city council<br />

provided the extension is approved by the voters no later<br />

resolution adopting the imposition <strong>of</strong> a local sales tax;<br />

than Nov. 7, 2017, at either a general election or a special<br />

provide notice <strong>of</strong> and conduct forums for expression <strong>of</strong><br />

election held on the first Tuesday after the First Monday<br />

public opinion on the referendum; and provide facts and<br />

<strong>of</strong> a November. The vote must still list the projects to be<br />

data on the impact <strong>of</strong> a proposed sales tax and on the<br />

funded from the tax extension but the tax does not have<br />

programs and projects that are proposed to be funded<br />

to expire for one year before being re-imposed. Both<br />

with the local sales tax. Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

sections are effective for the city that approves them the day<br />

• St. Paul use <strong>of</strong> sales tax revenues. Section 44 amends<br />

after compliance by the governing body <strong>of</strong> each city with Minn.<br />

<strong>Law</strong>s 1993, ch. 375, art. 9, sec. 46, subd. 2, (as amended<br />

Stat.§ 645.021, subdivisions 2 and 3.<br />

most recently by <strong>Law</strong>s 2009, ch. 88, art. 4, sec. 15) to<br />

• Clearwater; use <strong>of</strong> sales tax revenues. Section 49<br />

allow the City <strong>of</strong> St. Paul to deposit into an economic<br />

amends <strong>Law</strong>s 2008, chapter 366, article 7, section 19,<br />

development fund any portion <strong>of</strong> the 40 percent <strong>of</strong> its<br />

subdivision 3, as amended by <strong>Law</strong>s 2011, First Special<br />

sales tax revenue dedicated to the St. Paul Civic Center<br />

Session chapter 7, article 4, section 8 to provide a specific<br />

list <strong>of</strong> park and trail improvements that the City<br />

Complex not needed for meeting civic center obligations.<br />

Effective the day after compliance by the governing body<br />

<strong>of</strong> Clearwater may fund with its local sales tax. The $12<br />

<strong>of</strong> the City <strong>of</strong> St. Paul with Minn. Stat.§ 645.021, subds 2<br />

million total amount <strong>of</strong> revenue that the city was permitted<br />

to raise from the sales tax remains the same as it<br />

and 3.<br />

• St. Paul extension <strong>of</strong> expiration <strong>of</strong> tax authority.<br />

Section 45 amends <strong>Law</strong>s 1993, ch. 375, art. 9, sec. 46,<br />

was in the original 2008 authorizing legislation. Effective<br />

the day after compliance by the governing body <strong>of</strong> the City <strong>of</strong><br />

subd. 5, as amended by <strong>Law</strong>s 1998, ch. 389, art. 8, sec. 32<br />

Clearwater with Minn. Stat.§ 645.021, subdivisions 2 and 3.<br />

to extend the authority for the St. Paul local sales tax to<br />

• Marshall; use <strong>of</strong> food and beverage tax and validation<br />

<strong>of</strong> prior act. Section 50 amends <strong>Law</strong>s 2010, chap-<br />

Dec. 31, 2042. The tax is currently set to expire on Dec.<br />

31, 2030. Effective the day after compliance by the governing<br />

body <strong>of</strong> the City <strong>of</strong> St. Paul with Minn. Stat.§ 645.021,<br />

ter 389, article 5, section 6, subdivision 6 to allow the<br />

City <strong>of</strong> Marshall to use proceeds <strong>of</strong> this tax for construction<br />

<strong>of</strong> the <strong>Minnesota</strong> Emergency Response and Train-<br />

subds 2 and 3.<br />

• Rochester lodging tax. Section 46 <strong>Law</strong>s 2002, ch.<br />

ing Center and the Southwest Amateur Sports Center,<br />

377, art. 3, sec. 25, as amended by <strong>Law</strong>s 2009, ch. 88, art.<br />

as well as for their ongoing maintenance costs. Section<br />

4, sec. 19, and <strong>Law</strong>s 2010, ch. 389, art. 5, sec. 3 modifies<br />

51 gives the City <strong>of</strong> Marshall until July 1, <strong>2013</strong>, to file<br />

the Rochester lodging tax as follows:<br />

its approval <strong>of</strong> the special laws authorizing the food and<br />

• Increases the allowed rate <strong>of</strong> the lodging tax imposed<br />

beverage and lodging taxes originally enacted in 2010.<br />

to fund construction, renovation, improvement, and<br />

Both sections are effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

expansion <strong>of</strong> the Mayo Civic Center Complex from 1<br />

• City <strong>of</strong> Proctor; validation <strong>of</strong> prior act. Section 52<br />

percent to 3 percent.<br />

allows the City <strong>of</strong> Proctor to approve the extended uses<br />

• Adds design costs to the allowed uses for the lodging<br />

and additional bond authority authorized under 2008<br />

tax proceeds.<br />

and 2010 special law by passing a resolution and filing the<br />

• Increases the authority to issue bonds for this project<br />

approval with the secretary <strong>of</strong> state by Jan. 1, 2014. The<br />

from $43.5 million to $50 million.<br />

additional bonding authority in the 2010 law was already<br />

approved by the city voters. Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Summaries</strong> Page 57


Article 9: Economic development<br />

• Bloomington Port Authority public bidding<br />

requirement. Section 1 amends Minn. Stat. § 469.071,<br />

subd. 5 to modify the Bloomington Port Authority’s<br />

special law exception to the general competitive bidding<br />

requirements. Under present law, this exception is<br />

limited to structured parking constructed above, below,<br />

or adjacent to the development. The section expands<br />

the exemption to apply regardless <strong>of</strong> the source <strong>of</strong> port<br />

authority funds used (present law is limited to TIF<br />

and revenue bonds) and to extend it to other public<br />

improvements in addition to structured parking. Effective<br />

upon compliance <strong>of</strong> the governing body <strong>of</strong> the City <strong>of</strong><br />

Bloomington with the requirements <strong>of</strong> Minn. Stat.§ 645.021,<br />

subdivisions 2 and 3.<br />

• Border city funding. Section 2 amends Minn. Stat. §<br />

469.169 to allocate $1.5 million for border city enterprise<br />

zone and border city development zone tax reductions.<br />

This allocation is divided equally between the<br />

two programs, but the city can reallocate the amounts<br />

between the two programs. The allocation is divided<br />

among the qualifying border cities on a per capita basis.<br />

The five cities that qualify are Moorhead, Dilworth, East<br />

Grand Forks, Breckenridge, and Ortonville. Effective July<br />

1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• TIF economic development districts. Section 3<br />

amends Minn. Stat. § 469.176, subd. 4c to eliminate<br />

obsolete language related to qualified border retail facilities<br />

as well as the temporary 2010 jobs bill exemptions.<br />

(Note: Although the Senate tax bill extended the 2010<br />

jobs flexibilities for two additional years, the final bill did<br />

not include the extension.) Effective for districts for which<br />

the request for certification was made after June 30, 2012.<br />

• TIF general government use. Section 4 amends<br />

Minn. Stat. § 469.176, subdivision 4g to eliminate the<br />

prohibition on using tax increments for improvements<br />

and equipment that either primarily serve a decorative<br />

or aesthetic purpose or have costs twice as high because<br />

<strong>of</strong> the selection <strong>of</strong> the types <strong>of</strong> materials or designs<br />

compared with more commonly used improvements or<br />

equipment. Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>, for all tax increment<br />

financing districts, regardless <strong>of</strong> when the request for certification<br />

was made, but applies only to amounts spent after final enactment.<br />

• TIF four-year rule. Section 5 amends Minn. Stat. §<br />

469.176, subd. 6 to extend through Dec. 31, 2016, the<br />

temporary two-year extension <strong>of</strong> the four-year rule that<br />

applies to TIF districts certified between Jan. 1, 2005,<br />

and April 20, 2009. Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>, and applies to<br />

districts certified on or after Jan. 1, 2005, and before April 20,<br />

2009.<br />

• TIF original local tax rate; general education levy.<br />

Section 6 amends Minn. Stat. § 469.177, subd. 1a to<br />

exclude the tax rate attributable to the reinstated general<br />

education levy from the certified original TIF tax<br />

Page 58<br />

rate. This change will prevent the general education tax,<br />

authorized under Session <strong>Law</strong>s <strong>2013</strong>, Chapter 116, from<br />

applying to the captured tax capacity and from generating<br />

tax increment. Effective for districts for which the request<br />

for certification is made after April 15, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• TIF Adjustment to original net tax capacity. Sections<br />

7 adds a subdivision to Minn. Stat. § 469.177, subd.<br />

1d, to authorize development authorities to elect to<br />

reduce the original net tax capacity <strong>of</strong> a qualifying TIF<br />

district to adjust for the effects the homestead market<br />

value exclusion (HMVE). The HMVE had the effect<br />

<strong>of</strong> reducing the amount <strong>of</strong> increment in districts with<br />

qualifying homestead property. Under this new law, the<br />

development authority can elect to reduce a qualifying<br />

district’s original tax capacity which will have the effect<br />

<strong>of</strong> increasing captured tax capacity and the amount <strong>of</strong><br />

tax increment for the district.<br />

The election must be approved by the municipality,<br />

which is typically the city in which the TIF district<br />

is located. The election is limited to districts that have<br />

a large loss in captured tax capacity as a result <strong>of</strong> enactment<br />

<strong>of</strong> the HMVE. To qualify for the election, a district<br />

must satisfy three criteria:<br />

(1) The district received a homestead market value<br />

credit <strong>of</strong> $10,000 or more for taxes payable in<br />

2011 (the last year before the credit was replaced<br />

by the HMVE).<br />

(2) The captured net tax capacity <strong>of</strong> the district must<br />

have dropped by at least 1.75 percent as a result<br />

<strong>of</strong> the HMVE for taxes payable in <strong>2013</strong> (the most<br />

recently available year).<br />

(3) Either the district’s five-year rule must still be<br />

open (i.e., the increments are still permitted to be<br />

spent) or the district must not have enough increment<br />

to pay its outstanding bonds.<br />

For a qualifying district, the subtraction will equal<br />

the reduction in net tax capacity <strong>of</strong> the TIF district<br />

that results from the HMVE for taxes payable in <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

The subtraction cannot reduce original net tax capacity<br />

below zero. An election must be made before July 1,<br />

2014. For an election to apply for taxes payable in 2014,<br />

it must be made by July 1, <strong>2013</strong>. Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>,<br />

and applies to all tax increment financing districts regardless <strong>of</strong><br />

when the request for certification was made.<br />

• Adjustment to original TIF net tax capacity;<br />

qualifying 4d class (low-income rental housing)<br />

districts. Section 8 adds a subdivision to Minn. Stat. §<br />

469.177, Subd. 1e, to provide for a reduction in original<br />

net tax capacity for qualifying TIF districts <strong>of</strong> up<br />

to $20,000. Reductions in original tax capacity under<br />

this provision have the effect <strong>of</strong> increasing captured tax<br />

capacity and the amount <strong>of</strong> tax increment for the district.<br />

To qualify for the reduction, the district must have<br />

been certified in calendar year 2011 and have 75 percent<br />

<strong>of</strong> its value in class 4d apartment property apartment<br />

<strong>League</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>Cities</strong>


property and have a per unit market value <strong>of</strong> at least creating a redevelopment TIF district) requires that 70<br />

$115,000. The adjustment expires for property taxes payable<br />

in 2021. Effective beginning for taxes payable in 2014. ings or other qualifying structures and that 50 percent<br />

percent <strong>of</strong> the parcels in an area be occupied by build-<br />

• Distributions <strong>of</strong> general education levy taxes. Section<br />

9 amends Minn. Stat. § 469.177, subdivision 9 to as being occupied by a substandard building if the par-<br />

<strong>of</strong> the buildings be substandard. A parcel can be treated<br />

provide that the taxes paid by captured tax capacity <strong>of</strong> cel was occupied by a substandard building that was<br />

TIF districts that are attributable to the new general demolished within three years <strong>of</strong> certification <strong>of</strong> the<br />

education levy authorized under <strong>Law</strong>s <strong>2013</strong>, Chapter<br />

143, Article 3, will be paid to the school district that vides special rules for meeting this four-part test:<br />

district and if a four-part test is satisfied. The bill pro-<br />

imposed the levy. Effective for districts for which the request ··<br />

The three-year time limit between demolition <strong>of</strong><br />

for certification is made after April 15, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

the building and the certification <strong>of</strong> the district does<br />

• Mall <strong>of</strong> America (MOA) fiscal disparities calculations.<br />

Section 10 adds a new subdivision to Minn. Stat. ··<br />

The requirement that private demolition (if done<br />

not apply.<br />

§ 473F.08, Subd 3c, to provide that commercial-industrial<br />

tax capacity in the MOA TIF districts is exempt<br />

authority) be done under a development agreement<br />

by the property owner rather than the development<br />

from contributing to the area-wide pool and that tax<br />

does not apply.<br />

increments in the MOA TIF districts include the tax that The adjustment to original net tax capacity (increasing<br />

it for any reduction in tax capacity resulting from<br />

would normally be paid to the area-wide pool. Effective<br />

for taxes payable in 2014, after Bloomington certifies to the demolition <strong>of</strong> the building) does not apply. This is consistent<br />

with the original special law, which allowed the<br />

Hennepin County auditor that the city has entered a binding,<br />

written agreement to rehabilitate or replace the Old Cedar Avenue<br />

bridge, and approves the provisions <strong>of</strong> section 23 requiring Effective upon compliance by the governing body <strong>of</strong> the City<br />

city to set the original tax capacity at the land value.<br />

the city to transfer increments from these districts to pay for the <strong>of</strong> Oakdale with the requirements <strong>of</strong> Minn. Stat. § 645.021,<br />

Old Cedar Avenue bridge.<br />

subd. 3, except that the provisions <strong>of</strong> paragraph (c) are effective<br />

• Bloomington Central Station (BCS) TIF. Section 11 only upon compliance with Minn. Stat. § 469.1782, subd. 2,<br />

amends <strong>Law</strong>s 2008, chapter 366, article 5, section 26 to by the county and school district.<br />

make three changes in Bloomington’s BCS TIF district:<br />

• Oakdale TIF; extension and expanded spending<br />

(a) Extends the five-year rule (previously extended to<br />

authority. Section 13 amends <strong>Law</strong>s 2010, chapter 216,<br />

ten years under 2008 special legislation) to 15 years.<br />

sec. 55 to extend the duration <strong>of</strong> the Bergen Plaza TIF<br />

(b) Allows the city to extend the duration <strong>of</strong> the district<br />

through 2039 (an eight-year extension).<br />

district in Oakdale by 16 years. In 2010, the Legislature<br />

granted this district a 10-year extension, so the combined<br />

extensions would equal 26 years. This section also<br />

(c) Unfreezes the original tax capacity rate, allowing<br />

the district’s increment to be calculated using<br />

repeals the restrictions the 2010 special legislation placed<br />

the current tax rate, not the rate that was in effect<br />

on the extension. The 2010 legislation prohibited pooling<br />

<strong>of</strong> increments from the district during the extension,<br />

when the district was certified.<br />

Bullet points (a) and (c) are effective upon compliance by except to the extent that they were used for improvements<br />

on two listed parcels. (Pooling refers to the spend-<br />

Bloomington with the requirements <strong>of</strong> Minn. Stat. § 645.021,<br />

subdivision 3. Bullet point (b) is effective upon compliance ing <strong>of</strong> increments from the district on activities outside<br />

by the governing bodies <strong>of</strong> the City <strong>of</strong> Bloomington, Hennepin<br />

County, and Independent School District No. 271 with pre-1990 district that would otherwise not have been<br />

<strong>of</strong> the geographic area <strong>of</strong> the district. This district is a<br />

the requirements <strong>of</strong> Minn. Stat. §§ 469.1782, subd. 2, and subject to pooling restrictions.) Under the changes made<br />

645.021, subd. 3.<br />

by this section, this restriction would not apply, allowing<br />

• Oakdale TIF. Section 12 amends <strong>Law</strong>s 2008, chapter the city to use the district’s increments on activities anywhere<br />

in the project area. Effective upon compliance by the<br />

366, article 5, section 34 to modify the special TIF law<br />

for the City <strong>of</strong> Oakdale, passed in 2008 and modified in governing body <strong>of</strong> the City <strong>of</strong> Oakdale with the requirements<br />

2009, granting the city authority to deviate from general <strong>of</strong> Minn. Stat. § 645.021, subd. 3, except that the provisions<br />

law with regard to TIF districts created in a defined area <strong>of</strong> paragraph (c) are effective only upon compliance with Minn.<br />

<strong>of</strong> the city. This provision makes two changes in the special<br />

law authority:<br />

• St. Cloud TIF. Section 14 is an uncodified session law<br />

Stat. § 469.1782, subd. 2, by the county and school district.<br />

• The period <strong>of</strong> time that the city has to establish TIF that deems TIF District No. 2, referred to as the Norwest<br />

districts under the special law is extended by four years District, in the City <strong>of</strong> St. Cloud, a “gap district”—a<br />

from <strong>2013</strong> to 2017.<br />

district for which the request for certification was made<br />

• An exemption is provided to the general “blight test” on or after Aug. 1, 1979, and before July 1, 1982. This<br />

rules. The blight test (essentially a requirement that an will clarify when the district was certified and what TIF<br />

area contain “blighting” conditions that legally justify rules apply to it. “Gap districts” were created before the<br />

<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Summaries</strong> Page 59


1982 Legislature allowed pooling <strong>of</strong> increments for new<br />

TIF districts. Effective upon approval by the governing body<br />

<strong>of</strong> the City <strong>of</strong> St. Cloud and compliance with Minn. Stat. §<br />

645.021, subd. 3.<br />

• Glencoe TIF extension. Section 15 is an uncodified<br />

session law that authorizes the City <strong>of</strong> Glencoe to<br />

extend the duration <strong>of</strong> its TIF district No. 4 through<br />

Dec. 31, 2023. This district is a redevelopment district<br />

that is required by general law to be decertified in <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

The additional increment collected during the extension<br />

would be limited to paying debt service on bonds that<br />

were outstanding on Jan. 1, <strong>2013</strong>, for public improvements<br />

serving:<br />

• The city’s TIF district No. 14 (a redevelopment district<br />

certified in 2004);<br />

• The city’s TIF district No. 15 (an economic development<br />

district certified in 2007); and<br />

• Benefited properties related to a series <strong>of</strong> special assessment<br />

bonds issued in 2007 (or refunding bonds).<br />

Effective upon compliance by the governing bodies <strong>of</strong> the cities<br />

<strong>of</strong> Glencoe, McLeod County, and Independent School District<br />

No. 2859 with the requirements <strong>of</strong> Minn. Stat. §§ 469.1782,<br />

subd. 2, and 645.021, subd. 3.<br />

• Ely TIF extension. Section 16 is an uncodified session<br />

law that allows the City <strong>of</strong> Ely to extend the duration <strong>of</strong><br />

its TIF district No. 1 from 2017 to 2021. The city is also<br />

permitted to transfer increments from TIF District No.<br />

3 to pay binding obligations <strong>of</strong> the TIF District No. 1,<br />

which has a deficit. This transfer is limited to $168,000<br />

or the amount <strong>of</strong> the shortfall in District No. 1, whichever<br />

is less. Effective upon approval by the governing bodies<br />

<strong>of</strong> the cities <strong>of</strong> Ely, St. Louis County, and Independent School<br />

District No. 696 with the requirements <strong>of</strong> Minn. Stat. §§<br />

469.1782, subd. 2, and 645.021, subd. 3.<br />

• Dakota County Community Development Agency<br />

(CDA) TIF district in West St. Paul. Section 17 is an<br />

uncodified session law that allows the Dakota County<br />

Community Development Agency (CDA) to establish<br />

a redevelopment TIF district in the City <strong>of</strong> West St.<br />

Paul, consisting <strong>of</strong> the parcels <strong>of</strong> a redevelopment district<br />

decertified in 2012. The district is treated as a redevelopment<br />

district, but it must be decertified in 2023. Under<br />

general law, a redevelopment district is allowed 26 years<br />

<strong>of</strong> increment, as contrasted with the five years allowed<br />

to this district. This district would be exempt from the<br />

blight test (i.e., the rules that restrict areas that qualify as<br />

redevelopment districts) and is provided exemptions for<br />

the following limits on the spending <strong>of</strong> redevelopment<br />

district increments:<br />

• The requirement that increments be used for blight<br />

correction does not apply.<br />

• The pooling rules (percentage limits on how much<br />

increment may be spent on activities outside <strong>of</strong> the<br />

TIF district) do not apply.<br />

Page 60<br />

The district’s captured tax capacity is included for<br />

computing state aid formulas (e.g., local government<br />

aid, county program aid, education aid, and so forth).<br />

Effective upon compliance by the governing body <strong>of</strong> the Dakota<br />

County Community Development Agency with the requirements<br />

<strong>of</strong> Minn. Stat. § 645.021, subd. 3.<br />

• City <strong>of</strong> Apple Valley TIF authority. Section 18 is an<br />

uncodified session law that grants special law authority<br />

to the City <strong>of</strong> Apple Valley to create TIF districts<br />

(until Dec. 31, 2022) under special rules in a defined<br />

area <strong>of</strong> the city. The city must find that 70 percent <strong>of</strong> the<br />

defined area has one or more <strong>of</strong> the following conditions:<br />

• Peat or other geotechnical difficulties with the soil<br />

that “impair” the ability to develop the parcel.<br />

• Substantial fill required for commercial development.<br />

• Landfills, dumps, or similar conditions.<br />

• Quarries (e.g., gravel pits) or similar resource extraction<br />

sites.<br />

• Floodway.<br />

• Substandard building(s), as defined under the TIF<br />

blight test under general law, on the parcel.<br />

A parcel is treated as wholly meeting a requirement<br />

if 70 percent <strong>of</strong> its area meets the requirement, except<br />

that a 30-percent test applies for the substandard building<br />

requirement.<br />

The following exceptions to general TIF rules<br />

would apply to new districts created in the defined area.<br />

Any type <strong>of</strong> TIF district, except an economic development<br />

district or housing district, could be created in the<br />

area and qualify for these special rules.<br />

• A new type <strong>of</strong> TIF district—a soils deficiency district—with<br />

special qualifying rules would be allowed.<br />

This authority roughly mirrors a similar type <strong>of</strong> district<br />

that existed under an old TIF law, which was<br />

repealed by the Legislature in the 1990s. To qualify, 60<br />

percent <strong>of</strong> the area would need to have soils or terrain<br />

difficulties with estimated correction costs such as<br />

grading or filling that exceed the fair market value <strong>of</strong><br />

the property, not counting the cost <strong>of</strong> roads and other<br />

public improvements for which landowners could be<br />

specially assessed. These soils deficiency districts could<br />

collect 21 years <strong>of</strong> increments and would be limited<br />

to spending increments on land acquisition, soils<br />

correction, public improvements, and administrative<br />

expenses.<br />

• The five-year rule is extended to 10 years. Under general<br />

law, the five-year rule limits the period <strong>of</strong> time<br />

that in-district expenditures (under the percentagepooling<br />

rules) may be spent.<br />

• The pooling percentage is increased from 20 percent<br />

to 80 percent, but to qualify for the higher percentage,<br />

the increment must be spent in the area defined by<br />

the bill (i.e., the project area could not extend beyond<br />

these boundaries).<br />

<strong>League</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>Cities</strong>


Effective upon approval by the governing body <strong>of</strong> the City<br />

<strong>of</strong> Apple Valley and timely compliance with Minn. Stat. §<br />

645.021, subd. 3.<br />

• City <strong>of</strong> Apple Valley; TIF Authority. Section 19 is an<br />

uncodified session law that authorizes the City <strong>of</strong> Apple<br />

Valley to use TIF to provide improvements, loans, and<br />

subsidies to buildings and facilities, if:<br />

• The projects will create or retain jobs, including construction<br />

jobs, in <strong>Minnesota</strong>.<br />

• Construction <strong>of</strong> the project will not begin prior to<br />

July 1, 2014 without the use <strong>of</strong> tax increment financing.<br />

• Request for certification <strong>of</strong> the district is made no<br />

later than June 30, 2014.<br />

• Construction <strong>of</strong> the project begins no later than July<br />

1, 2014.<br />

Effective upon approval by the governing body <strong>of</strong> the City<br />

<strong>of</strong> Apple Valley and timely compliance with Minn. Stat. §<br />

645.021, subd. 3.<br />

• Minneapolis value capture district for transit. Section<br />

20 is an uncodified session law that authorizes the<br />

City <strong>of</strong> Minneapolis to create a value capture district<br />

to finance construction <strong>of</strong> a streetcar line and related<br />

improvements. The city could include parcels in the<br />

district that are located in five defined areas <strong>of</strong> the city<br />

along the proposed line. Revenues from the district<br />

would be calculated using the same method that applies<br />

under the TIF law, except current tax rates would be<br />

used, rather than a certified original tax rate. Revenues<br />

from the district may be spent for items within an area<br />

located within one block on either side <strong>of</strong> the streetcar<br />

line. Permitted uses <strong>of</strong> district revenues are limited to:<br />

• Planning and design for the streetcar line.<br />

• Acquiring, constructing, and equipping the line.<br />

• Acquiring, constructing, and equipping transit stations.<br />

• Related public infrastructure improvements (sidewalks,<br />

street improvements, etc.).<br />

District revenues may not be used to pay for operation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the streetcar line. The city is authorized to issue<br />

bonds without an election under the authority. The<br />

duration <strong>of</strong> the district is limited to 25 years or the time<br />

needed to pay for the capital improvements, including<br />

bonds, if that is shorter. Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Maplewood TIF. Section 21 is an uncodified session<br />

law that authorizes the City <strong>of</strong> Maplewood to establish<br />

TIF districts within an area <strong>of</strong> the city, consisting <strong>of</strong> all<br />

or part <strong>of</strong> the corporate campus <strong>of</strong> the 3M Company.<br />

If the city so elects, these TIF districts will be subject<br />

to special law rules that differ from those under general<br />

TIF law. The city could approve TIF plans and establish<br />

districts under this authority through Dec. 31, 2018.<br />

The following special rules or exemptions from general<br />

law would apply to districts certified in the defined<br />

project area:<br />

• Blight test exemption. Redevelopment districts<br />

could be established without meeting the blight test.<br />

Ninety percent <strong>of</strong> increments from the district, unlike<br />

a general law redevelopment district, would not be<br />

required to be spent on correction <strong>of</strong> blight.<br />

• Pooling exemption. So long as increments are spent<br />

within the defined project area, restrictions on pooling<br />

increments do not apply.<br />

• Five-year rule exemption. The five-year rule, which<br />

requires spending to be completed within five years <strong>of</strong><br />

certification <strong>of</strong> the district, is extended to ten years.<br />

• One-year knockdown rule. Parcels in a district<br />

would be subject to a one-year knockdown rule—if<br />

construction does not start on a parcel within one year<br />

after its certification for inclusion in the TIF district,<br />

the parcel would be dropped from the district and<br />

could only be reinstated when construction actually<br />

begins. Under general law, a four-year period applies.<br />

Effective upon approval by the governing body <strong>of</strong> the City<br />

<strong>of</strong> Maplewood and upon compliance with Minn. Stat. §<br />

645.021, subd. 3.<br />

• Mall <strong>of</strong> America (MOA) TIF district; property<br />

transfer and extension. Section 22 is an uncodified<br />

session law that allows the port authority and City <strong>of</strong><br />

Bloomington to elect to transfer several parcels between<br />

the MOA TIF districts. This will allow these undeveloped<br />

parcels on the northern edge <strong>of</strong> the district containing<br />

the mall to be shifted to the district containing<br />

the site <strong>of</strong> the former Met Center. This would have the<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> extending by three years the ability to collect<br />

increments from these parcels.<br />

In addition, this section allows Bloomington to<br />

extend the two MOA TIF districts through 2034 (an<br />

18-year extension for the district containing the mall<br />

and 15-year extension for the district containing the<br />

Met Center site). During the extension, however, increment<br />

would be limited to the special fiscal disparities<br />

computation provided by section 10 and local tax rates<br />

for the city, county, school, and special districts would be<br />

computed including the captured tax capacity <strong>of</strong> the TIF<br />

districts. The extensions would terminate for taxes payable<br />

in 2024 if new improvements, worth at least $100<br />

million, have not been constructed in the Met Center<br />

District by Jan. 1, 2021.<br />

Effective upon compliance <strong>of</strong> the governing body <strong>of</strong> the City <strong>of</strong><br />

Bloomington with the requirements <strong>of</strong> Minn. Stat. § 645.021,<br />

subd. 3, but only if the city enters into a binding written agreement<br />

with the Metropolitan Council to repair and restore, or to<br />

replace, the old Cedar Avenue bridge for use by bicycle commuters<br />

and recreational users. This section is effective without<br />

approval <strong>of</strong> the county and school district under Minn. Stat. §<br />

469.1782, subd. 2.<br />

• City <strong>of</strong> Bloomington; Old Cedar Avenue bridge.<br />

Section 23 is an uncodified session law that requires the<br />

<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Summaries</strong> Page 61


City <strong>of</strong> Bloomington to transfer increment from its two<br />

MOA TIF districts equal to the amount <strong>of</strong> increment for<br />

taxes payable in 2014 as a result <strong>of</strong> section 10 to be used<br />

to renovate or replace the Old Cedar Avenue bridge. The<br />

section also prohibits putting signage on or around the<br />

bridge acknowledging contributions, sponsorships, or<br />

sale <strong>of</strong> naming rights to the bridge. Effective upon compliance<br />

by the City <strong>of</strong> Bloomington with the requirements <strong>of</strong><br />

Minn. Stat. § 645.021, subd. 3.<br />

Article 10: Destination medical center<br />

This article provides local bonding, taxing, and other<br />

development financing powers to the City <strong>of</strong> Rochester to<br />

fund public infrastructure for the Mayo Destination Medical<br />

Center project. The city must create a nonpr<strong>of</strong>it corporation<br />

to develop the plan and help finance development.<br />

The article provides state aid—based on the level <strong>of</strong> new<br />

nonpublic capital investment in Mayo Clinic and other<br />

private building projects in the city—to assist in building<br />

public infrastructure for the development. The maximum<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> general state aid is $327 million, with no<br />

more than $30 million per year (the city and county are<br />

expected to pay for $128 million to qualify for this aid). In<br />

addition, $116 million in funding for public transit is provided<br />

with a portion <strong>of</strong> this to be funded with local taxes.<br />

A sales tax exemption for construction materials and supplies<br />

is provided for public projects.<br />

• Rochester sales and use taxes authorized. Section<br />

11 amends <strong>Law</strong>s 1998, chapter 389, article 8, section 43,<br />

subd. 1 to authorize the City <strong>of</strong> Rochester to impose an<br />

additional general sales tax <strong>of</strong> up to one-quarter <strong>of</strong> 1 percent<br />

without voter approval. This tax would be in addition<br />

to the current one-half percent tax in Rochester.<br />

• Rochester sales tax; use <strong>of</strong> revenues. Section 12<br />

amends <strong>Law</strong>s 1998, chapter 389, article 8, section 43,<br />

subdivision 3, (as amended by <strong>Law</strong>s 2005, First Special<br />

Session chapter 3, article 5, section 28, and <strong>Law</strong>s 2011,<br />

First Special Session chapter 7, article 4, section 5) to<br />

require that any additional revenue resulting from either<br />

(1) an extension <strong>of</strong> the duration <strong>of</strong> the existing local sales<br />

tax or (2) an increase in the local sales tax rate under section<br />

11 above, be used to fund the city share <strong>of</strong> public<br />

infrastructure costs related to the DMC development<br />

plan. This section repeals the requirement for the city to<br />

share $5 million <strong>of</strong> its existing sales tax revenues with<br />

surrounding cities. This authority is reinstated subject to<br />

city council approval in section 14 below.<br />

• Rochester termination <strong>of</strong> taxes. Section 13 amends<br />

<strong>Law</strong>s 1998, chapter 389, article 8, section 43, subdivision<br />

5, (as amended by <strong>Law</strong>s 2005, First Special Session chapter<br />

3, article 5, section 30, and <strong>Law</strong>s 2011, First Special<br />

Session chapter 7, article 4, section 7) to authorize the<br />

city to extend the duration <strong>of</strong> the existing one-half <strong>of</strong> 1<br />

percent local sales tax as late as Dec. 31, 2049, without<br />

voter approval. This section also provides that if the sales<br />

Page 62<br />

tax rate is increased under section 11, the additional tax<br />

expires at the earlier <strong>of</strong> Dec. 31, 2049, or when the city<br />

determines that the total revenues raised by the city for<br />

the DMC project under this and other optional taxes is<br />

sufficient to meet the city’s obligation.<br />

• Rochester sales tax sharing. Section 14 is a session<br />

law that effectively reinstates the Rochester sales tax<br />

sharing authority stricken in section 12. This section<br />

allows the City <strong>of</strong> Rochester to share $5 million <strong>of</strong> its<br />

local sales tax revenue collection with the surrounding<br />

cities <strong>of</strong> Byron, Chatfield, Dodge Center, Dover, Elgin,<br />

Eyota, Hayfield, Kasson, Mantorville, Oronoco, Pine<br />

Island, Plainview, Spring Valley, St. Charles, Stewartville,<br />

West Concord, and Zumbrota. The section requires the<br />

city council to hold a hearing and approve the revenue<br />

sharing by resolution by Sept. 1, <strong>2013</strong>, in order to share<br />

the money. If the city does not pass the resolution, the<br />

$5 million is directed to paying the city share <strong>of</strong> costs<br />

related to the DMC development plan.<br />

Article 10 is generally effective the day after the governing body<br />

<strong>of</strong> the City <strong>of</strong> Rochester timely complies with Minn. Stat.§<br />

645.021, subds 2 and 3.<br />

Article 11: Minerals taxes<br />

The article increases the taconite production tax by five<br />

cents per ton and makes the following changes in the distribution<br />

<strong>of</strong> the taconite production tax revenues:<br />

• Provides for increased payments to all school districts in<br />

the taconite tax relief area.<br />

• Increases the match requirement for companies receiving<br />

distributions from the taconite economic development<br />

fund from 50 percent to an equal match.<br />

• Reduces the distribution to the property tax relief fund<br />

by nine cents per ton. (This fund pays the taconite<br />

homestead credit.)<br />

• Modifies the one-time distributions made in <strong>2013</strong> <strong>Law</strong>s<br />

Ch. 85 (the omnibus jobs bill) by decreasing a distribution<br />

to the City <strong>of</strong> Tower and providing an additional<br />

distribution to the City <strong>of</strong> Grand Rapids.<br />

• Authorizes the Iron Range Resources and Rehabilitation<br />

commissioner to issue bonds to finance school capital<br />

projects for schools in the two taconite areas.<br />

Article 12: Public finance<br />

• Authority to invest in state and local securities.<br />

Section 1 amends Minn. Stat. § 118A.04, subd. 3 to<br />

modify the law regulating the authority to invest local<br />

government funds in municipal securities to include:<br />

• Revenue obligations <strong>of</strong> local governments without<br />

taxing authority, if the obligations are rated AA or better.<br />

Under current law, the issuing governmental unit<br />

must have taxing power.<br />

• Any short-term school district obligation (13<br />

months or less) if it is either: (1) rated in the highest<br />

<strong>League</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>Cities</strong>


ating category; or (2) covered by the state credit<br />

enhancement program.<br />

Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Guaranteed investment contracts (GICs). Section 2<br />

amends Minn. Stat. § 118A.05, subd. 5 to authorize local<br />

governments to invest in short-term GICs (18 months<br />

or less), if the issuer’s or guarantor’s short-term debt is<br />

rated in the highest rating category, even if the longterm<br />

debt <strong>of</strong> those companies is rated below the top two<br />

rating categories. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Special assessments for energy improvements.<br />

Section 3 amends Minn. Stat. § 216C.436, subd. 7 to<br />

eliminate a reference under the energy improvement<br />

financing program (EIFP) enacted in 2010 that the<br />

properties must be “benefited,” and allows EIFP special<br />

assessments to be repaid in 20 equal annual installments.<br />

Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Dakota County Community Development<br />

Agency (DCCDA) authority to establish housing<br />

improvement areas. Section 7 adds a new subdivision<br />

to Minn. Stat. § 383D.4, subd. 10, to authorize<br />

the DCCDA to exercise housing improvement district<br />

powers. The agency would be allowed to do this<br />

by resolution, rather than ordinance, as is required for<br />

cities exercising those powers. The community development<br />

agency is required to send a copy <strong>of</strong> each<br />

petition for the establishment <strong>of</strong> a housing improvement<br />

area to the city in which the proposed housing<br />

improvement area is located and the DCCDA may not<br />

establish a housing improvement area if the applicable<br />

city council opposes the establishment by resolution<br />

adopted within 30 days after the petition is sent.<br />

Housing improvement districts assist townhome and<br />

condominium developments to finance rehabilitation<br />

costs. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Home rule charter city and statutory city capital<br />

notes. Sections 8 and 9 amend Minn. Stat. §§ 410.32<br />

and 412.301 to expand the capital note authority for<br />

home rule charter cities and statutory cities to allow the<br />

purchase <strong>of</strong> application development services and training<br />

related to the use <strong>of</strong> the computer hardware and<br />

s<strong>of</strong>tware. Both sections are effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• City capital improvement program (CIP) bonds.<br />

Section 15 amends Minn. Stat. § 475.521, subd. 1 to<br />

authorize use <strong>of</strong> CIP bonds for expenditures incurred<br />

before adoption <strong>of</strong> the CIP, if the expenditures are<br />

included in the plan. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• City CIP bonds; election requirement. Section 16<br />

amends Minn. Stat. § 475.521, subd. 2 to make changes<br />

to the city CIP reverse referendum provisions. If the<br />

municipality elects not to submit the question to the<br />

voters, the municipality shall not propose the issuance <strong>of</strong><br />

bonds under this section for the same purpose and in the<br />

same amount for a period <strong>of</strong> 365 days from the date <strong>of</strong><br />

receipt <strong>of</strong> the petition. If the issue is submitted and the<br />

voters do not approve, the issue can be resubmitted to<br />

the voters after 180 days. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Street reconstruction bonds. Section 17 amends<br />

Minn. Stat. § 475.58, subd. 3b to allow street reconstruction<br />

bonds to be used for bituminous overlay projects,<br />

which currently are not considered reconstruction.<br />

The section makes changes in the reverse referendum<br />

provisions that parallel the similar provisions for city<br />

CIP bonds in section 16 above, and also provides that<br />

expenditures incurred before adoption <strong>of</strong> the capital<br />

improvement plan can be financed with the bonds, if<br />

the expenditures are included in the plan. Effective July 1,<br />

<strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• St. Paul capital improvement plan (CIP) bonding.<br />

Section 18 amends <strong>Law</strong>s 1971, chapter 773, section 1,<br />

subdivision 2, (as amended most recently by <strong>Law</strong>s 2002,<br />

chapter 390, section 23) to extend through 2014 the St.<br />

Paul CIP bonding authority, which is set to expire at<br />

the end <strong>of</strong> <strong>2013</strong>. These general obligation bonds may be<br />

issued upon a vote <strong>of</strong> five <strong>of</strong> the seven members <strong>of</strong> the<br />

city council without voter approval—this is an exception<br />

to the city’s home rule charter, which otherwise<br />

would require simple majority approval by the council<br />

and voter approval. Effective the day after compliance by<br />

the governing body <strong>of</strong> the City <strong>of</strong> St. Paul with Minn. Stat.§<br />

645.021, subdivisions 2 and 3.<br />

Article 13: Miscellaneous provisions<br />

• Purpose statements for tax expenditures. Section<br />

22 is an uncodified session law that establishes purpose<br />

statements for various tax expenditures added by<br />

the omnibus tax bill, as required by Minn. Stat. § 3.192,<br />

requires bills that create new tax expenditures or renew<br />

existing tax expenditures to provide a purpose for the<br />

tax expenditure and a standard or goal for use in measuring<br />

its effectiveness. The purpose statements include:<br />

• Federal conformity: to simplify compliance and<br />

administration <strong>of</strong> the individual income tax.<br />

• Income tax subtraction for federal railroad<br />

track maintenance credit: to increase maintenance<br />

and upgrading <strong>of</strong> railroad track in <strong>Minnesota</strong>.<br />

• Historic structure rehabilitation credit: to create<br />

and retain jobs related to historic rehabilitation.<br />

• Greater <strong>Minnesota</strong> internship credit: to encourage<br />

<strong>Minnesota</strong> businesses to provide more internships<br />

in Greater <strong>Minnesota</strong>.<br />

• Sales tax exemption for Greater <strong>Minnesota</strong><br />

businesses: to induce increased investment and<br />

expand employment in Greater <strong>Minnesota</strong>.<br />

• Expansion <strong>of</strong> sales tax exemption <strong>of</strong> durable<br />

medical products to Medicare and Medicaid<br />

purchases: to simplify sales tax administration and<br />

provide relief for sellers unable to collect tax under<br />

Medicare and Medicaid.<br />

<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Summaries</strong> Page 63


• Sales tax exemption for public safety radio<br />

communications systems: to provide equal treatment<br />

to local governments on public safety radio purchases.<br />

• Sales tax exemption for established religious<br />

orders: to maintain an existing exemption that is<br />

jeopardized due to a St. John’s University governance<br />

change.<br />

• Sales tax exemption for certain dental providers:<br />

to defray the costs <strong>of</strong> these providers to encourage<br />

provision <strong>of</strong> service to underserved communities.<br />

• Sales tax exemption for nursing homes and<br />

boarding care homes: to maintain an existing<br />

exemption potentially eliminated due to a property<br />

tax court case.<br />

• Various sales tax exemptions for construction<br />

materials: to increase jobs and reduce tax pyramiding.<br />

• Sales tax exemption for aircraft parts and labor:<br />

to encourage growth <strong>of</strong> the aviation service sector in<br />

the state.<br />

• Sales tax exemption for public infrastructure<br />

related to destination medical center: to reduce<br />

city costs for projects.<br />

Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

Article 14: Market value definitions<br />

Article 14 converts the computation <strong>of</strong> levy, tax, spending,<br />

debt, and similar limits that are based on “market value” or<br />

“taxable market value” to estimated market value. This is<br />

done in response to the 2011 law that repealed the market<br />

value homestead credit and established the new homestead<br />

market value exclusion. Subsequent statutory interpretations<br />

by the Department <strong>of</strong> Revenue had the effect <strong>of</strong><br />

reducing these limits by the amount <strong>of</strong> the new homestead<br />

market value exclusion. Converting these definitions to”<br />

estimated market value” will base these limits on the assessor’s<br />

estimate <strong>of</strong> the properties’ fair market value, including<br />

any board or court orders adjusting that value, but before<br />

any exclusions, adjustments, or other changes are made to<br />

the value for tax or legislative policy purposes. Below are<br />

summaries <strong>of</strong> several <strong>of</strong> the more substantial sections <strong>of</strong> the<br />

article that impact cities.<br />

• Eminent domain blight test. Section 14 amends<br />

Minn. Stat. § 117.025, subd. 7 to modify the definition<br />

<strong>of</strong> “structurally substandard” under the blight test in the<br />

eminent domain statute to refer to estimated market<br />

value, rather than taxable market value. Effective May 24,<br />

<strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Computation <strong>of</strong> adjusted net tax capacity<br />

(ANTC) for aid distribution purposes. Section 15<br />

amends Minn. Stat. § 127A.48, subd. 1 to require the<br />

department <strong>of</strong> revenue to compute ANTC values for<br />

cities, counties, and townships. ANTC is used in various<br />

state aid formulas that are based on “equalized”<br />

tax base amounts, including LGA, which is equalized<br />

Page 64<br />

or adjusted for the variations in local assessment practices<br />

using assessment sales ratios. The existing statute,<br />

which is codified in the school aid statutes, only refers to<br />

the computation <strong>of</strong> ANTC for school districts but this<br />

statute is cross-referenced by city, county and township<br />

aid programs. This section also clarifies that the ANTC<br />

computations use values that reflect fiscal disparities, tax<br />

increment financing, and the power line credit. Article<br />

14, Section 110 further directs the Revisor <strong>of</strong> Statutes<br />

to recodify this and adjacent statutes (Minn. Stat. §<br />

127A.48, Subds. 1 to 6) as Minn. Stat. § 273.1325, subdivisions<br />

1 to 6. Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Definition <strong>of</strong> estimated market value. Section 23<br />

adds a new subdivision, Minn. Stat. § 272.03, Subd. 14.<br />

to define “estimated market value” for purposes <strong>of</strong> the<br />

property tax statutes as the assessor’s determination <strong>of</strong><br />

market value, including any board orders, for the parcel<br />

<strong>of</strong> property. The definition <strong>of</strong> estimated market for a taxing<br />

district in section 25 governs the computation <strong>of</strong> tax<br />

levy limits, debt limits, and state aid computations. This<br />

section contains the general definition <strong>of</strong> a parcel’s estimated<br />

market value. Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Definition <strong>of</strong> taxable market value. Section 24 adds<br />

a new subdivision, <strong>Minnesota</strong> Statutes 2012, section<br />

272.03, subd 15, that defines “taxable market value” for<br />

purposes <strong>of</strong> the property tax statutes as the estimated<br />

market value <strong>of</strong> the parcel reduced by market value<br />

exclusions, deferments <strong>of</strong> value (e.g., green acres, rural<br />

preserves, open space, metropolitan agricultural preserves)<br />

and other adjustments that reduce market value<br />

before class rates are applied. Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Market value definition; computation <strong>of</strong> levy limits,<br />

debt limits, and state aid. Section 25 amends<br />

Minn. Stat. § 273.032 to convert the statute that provides<br />

the general rules for computing tax levy limits,<br />

debt limits, and state aid computations based on market<br />

value from “taxable market value” to “estimated market<br />

value.” Under current law, taxable market value is computed<br />

after (1) limited market value (which has expired<br />

and is obsolete) and (2) the “This Old House” valuation<br />

exclusion, but includes tax-exempt wind energy values.<br />

In addition, it provides that market value does not reflect<br />

adjustments for TIF, fiscal disparities, and the power<br />

line credit. In the past, the department <strong>of</strong> revenue has<br />

applied the statute to exclude a variety <strong>of</strong> minor valuation<br />

exclusions not explicitly referenced in the statute.<br />

The amendments now specifically reference these minor<br />

exclusions, while providing that estimated market value<br />

is the value before these adjustments. By converting the<br />

limits to estimated market value, the definition will not<br />

reflect the reductions or shifts in value caused by the following:<br />

• The various deferrals, such as green acres, open space,<br />

and rural preserves. This change from current practice<br />

will increase limits in areas with these properties.<br />

<strong>League</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>Cities</strong>


• Exclusions, including the homestead market value<br />

exclusion enacted by the 2011 Legislature, as well as<br />

the more minor exclusions in prior law.<br />

• Adjustments to tax capacity, such as fiscal disparities<br />

and TIF (current practice).<br />

Present law requires that tax-exempt wind energy<br />

property be added to taxable market value. The section<br />

reverses that, confirming apparent local administrative<br />

practices in the counties with the largest amounts<br />

<strong>of</strong> this property. The measure <strong>of</strong> estimated market value<br />

for tax limits is the amount for the previous assessment<br />

year, while for debt limits it is the most recently available<br />

amount. Limits under special law and city charters<br />

that are based on market value are also converted to estimated<br />

market value. Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Levy limits based on mill rates; growth factor.<br />

Section 32 amends Minn. Stat. § 275.011, subd 1 to<br />

provide that the law converting old special law and city<br />

charter provisions containing levy or mill rate limits will<br />

provide increases based on the rate <strong>of</strong> growth in estimated<br />

market value, rather than taxable market value.<br />

Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Continuance <strong>of</strong> nonconforming land uses. Section<br />

61 amends Minn. Stat. § 394.36, subd. 1 to modify the<br />

exception to the authority to continue nonconforming<br />

land uses if more than 50 percent <strong>of</strong> the market value <strong>of</strong><br />

the building or structure is destroyed by fire or natural<br />

disaster so that the test is based on estimated, rather than<br />

taxable, market value. Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Capital notes; home rule charter cities. Section 64<br />

amends Minn. Stat. § 410.32 to convert the debt limit<br />

that applies to capital notes issued without an election<br />

by a home rule charter city from 0.03 percent <strong>of</strong> taxable<br />

market value to estimated market value. Effective<br />

May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Certain contracts; statutory cities. Section 65<br />

amends Minn. Stat. § 412.221, subd. 2 to convert the<br />

threshold that subjects conditional sale contracts and<br />

contracts for deed purchases by statutory cities to reverse<br />

referendum authority from 0.24177 percent <strong>of</strong> taxable<br />

market value to the same percentage <strong>of</strong> estimated market<br />

value. Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Certificates <strong>of</strong> indebtedness; statutory cities. Section<br />

66 amends Minn. Stat. § 412.301 to convert the threshold<br />

that subjects statutory cities’ issuance <strong>of</strong> certificates <strong>of</strong><br />

indebtedness to reverse referendum authority from 0.25<br />

percent <strong>of</strong> taxable market value to the same percentage <strong>of</strong><br />

estimated market value. Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Special service districts; property subject to<br />

charges. Section 67 amends Minn. Stat. § 428A.02,<br />

subd. 1 to modify the test to determine whether a splituse<br />

property in a special service district is subject in full<br />

or proportionately to the charges or levies from 50 percent<br />

<strong>of</strong> taxable market value to the same percentage <strong>of</strong><br />

estimated market value. Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Campground levy. Section 70 amends Minn. Stat. §<br />

450.19 to convert the authorized levy for operation and<br />

maintenance <strong>of</strong> a city or town tourist camping grounds<br />

from 0.0806 percent <strong>of</strong> taxable market value to the<br />

same percentage <strong>of</strong> estimated market value. Effective May<br />

24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• St. Cloud Transit Commission levy. Section 72<br />

amends Minn. Stat. § 458A.10 to convert the limits on<br />

the St. Cloud Transit Commission property tax levy<br />

from 0.12089 percent <strong>of</strong> taxable market value to the<br />

same percentage <strong>of</strong> estimated market value. Effective May<br />

24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Duluth Transit Commission levy. Section 73 amends<br />

Minn. Stat. § 458A.31, subd. 1 to convert the limits on<br />

the Duluth Transit Commission property tax levy from<br />

0.07253 percent <strong>of</strong> taxable market value to the same percentage<br />

<strong>of</strong> estimated market value. Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• <strong>Cities</strong>; acceptance <strong>of</strong> conditional gifts. Section 74<br />

amends Minn. Stat. § 465.04, the qualifying rule allowing<br />

cities <strong>of</strong> the second, third, and fourth class cities to<br />

accept gifts with conditions (such as life annuity gifts<br />

with interest not to exceed 5 percent). The $41 million<br />

cap is now measured by estimated, not taxable, market<br />

value. Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA)<br />

levy limit. Section 75 amends Minn. Stat. § 469.033,<br />

subd. 6 to convert the levy limit for housing and redevelopment<br />

authorities from 0.0185 percent <strong>of</strong> taxable<br />

market value to the same percentage <strong>of</strong> estimated market<br />

value. Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA)<br />

debt limit. Section 76 amends Minn. Stat. § 469.034,<br />

subd. 2 to convert limit on the issuance <strong>of</strong> general obligation<br />

HRA bonds from 0.5 percent <strong>of</strong> taxable market<br />

value to the same percentage <strong>of</strong> estimated market value.<br />

Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Port authority; mandatory city levy limit. Section<br />

77 amends Minn. Stat. § 469.053, subd. 4 to convert the<br />

levy limit for the mandatory port authority levy (i.e.,<br />

the levy the city must levy on behalf <strong>of</strong> the port authority)<br />

from 0.01813 percent <strong>of</strong> taxable market value to the<br />

same percentage <strong>of</strong> estimated market value. Effective May<br />

24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Seaway Port Authority levy limit. Section 78 amends<br />

Minn. Stat. § 469.053, subd. 4a to convert the maximum<br />

basic levy <strong>of</strong> the Seaway Port Authority from 0.01813<br />

percent <strong>of</strong> taxable market value to the same percentage <strong>of</strong><br />

estimated market value. Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Port authority; discretionary city levy limit. Section<br />

79 amends Minn. Stat. § 469.053, subd. 6 to convert<br />

the limit for the discretionary port authority levy (i.e.,<br />

the levy the city may levy on behalf <strong>of</strong> the port authority)<br />

from 0.00282 percent <strong>of</strong> taxable market value to the<br />

same percentage <strong>of</strong> estimated market value. Effective May<br />

24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Summaries</strong> Page 65


• Economic Development Authority (EDA) levy<br />

limit. Section 80 amends Minn. Stat. § 469.107, subd.<br />

1 to convert the EDA city levy from 0.01813 percent <strong>of</strong><br />

taxable market value to the same percentage <strong>of</strong> estimated<br />

market value. Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• First-class city publicity levy limit. Section 82<br />

amends Minn. Stat § 469.187 to convert the authorized<br />

first-class city publicity levy from 0.0008 percent <strong>of</strong> taxable<br />

market value to the same percentage <strong>of</strong> estimated<br />

market value. Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Hazardous property penalty. Section 83 amends<br />

Minn. Stat. § 469.206 to convert the limit on the penalty<br />

a city may assess on hazardous properties from 1 percent<br />

<strong>of</strong> taxable market value to the same percentage <strong>of</strong> estimated<br />

market value. Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Joint maintenance <strong>of</strong> cemeteries. Section 84 amends<br />

Minn. Stat. § 471.24 to modify the law allowing contiguous<br />

towns and statutory cities to jointly maintain public<br />

cemeteries, if each has a minimum market value <strong>of</strong> $2<br />

million. The minimum market value requirement is now<br />

based on estimated market value. Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Taconite cities improvement fund. Section 85 amends<br />

Minn. Stat. § 471.571, subd 1 to modify the $2.5 million<br />

valuation threshold basis that permits a city with real and<br />

personal property consisting in part <strong>of</strong> iron ore or lands<br />

containing taconite or semi-taconite to establish a permanent<br />

improvement fund to being based on estimated,<br />

rather than taxable, market value. Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Taconite cities improvement fund levy limit. Section<br />

86 amends Minn. Stat. § 471.571, subd. 2 to convert<br />

calculation <strong>of</strong> the levy limits for the permanent improvement<br />

fund for taconite cities from 0.08059 percent <strong>of</strong><br />

taxable market value to the same percentage <strong>of</strong> estimated<br />

market value. Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Metro area fiscal disparities; adjusted market<br />

value. Section 94 amends Minn. Stat. § 473F.02, subd.<br />

12 to define “adjusted market value” for the purposes <strong>of</strong><br />

the metropolitan area fiscal disparities law to be taxable<br />

market value, adjusted by the assessment sales ratio. This<br />

change confirms existing practice, which is contrary to<br />

the statute’s use <strong>of</strong> estimated market value. Effective May<br />

24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Metro area fiscal disparities; fiscal capacity. Section<br />

95 amends Minn. Stat. § 473F.02, subd. 14 to clarify that<br />

fiscal capacity under the metropolitan area fiscal disparities<br />

law is based on adjusted market value. Effective May<br />

24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Metro area fiscal disparities; average fiscal capacity.<br />

Section 96 amends Minn. Stat. § 473F.02, subdivision<br />

15 to clarify that average fiscal capacity under the metropolitan<br />

area fiscal disparities law is based on adjusted<br />

market value. Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Metro area fiscal disparities; net tax capacity. Section<br />

97 amends Minn. Stat. § 473F.02, subdivision 23 to<br />

clarify that net tax capacity under the metropolitan area<br />

Page 66<br />

fiscal disparities law is based on taxable market value.<br />

Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Metro area fiscal disparities; adjustment <strong>of</strong> values.<br />

Section 98 amends Minn. Stat. § 473F.08, subdivision 10<br />

to eliminate the mandate that limits on levies, aid, taxes,<br />

debt, or salary based on values be adjusted to reflect the<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> the fiscal disparities law. Most <strong>of</strong> these limits<br />

will be based on estimated market value, which does not<br />

reflect the effects <strong>of</strong> fiscal disparities. The section also<br />

clarifies computation <strong>of</strong> fiscal capacity that are used to<br />

compute distributions to be consistent with administrative<br />

practices. Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• City CIP bonds. Section 99 amends Minn. Stat. §<br />

475.521, subd. 4 to convert the limit that applies under<br />

the city capital improvement program (CIP) bond law<br />

from 0.16 percent <strong>of</strong> taxable to estimated market value.<br />

Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• General net debt limit. Section 100 amends Minn.<br />

Stat. § 475.53, subd. 1 to convert the general net debt<br />

limit that applies to municipalities, other than school<br />

districts and first-class cities, from 3 percent <strong>of</strong> taxable to<br />

estimated market value. Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Net debt limit; first-class cities. Section 101 amends<br />

Minn. Stat. § 475.53, subd. 3 to convert the net debt<br />

limit that applies to first-class cities from 2 percent <strong>of</strong><br />

taxable market value to the same percentage <strong>of</strong> estimated<br />

market value. If the city charter permits a debt limit in<br />

excess <strong>of</strong> 2 percent, this section converts the maximum<br />

limit <strong>of</strong> 3-2/3 percent <strong>of</strong> taxable to estimated market<br />

value. Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Referendum exemption for refunding bonds. Section<br />

103 amends Minn. Stat. § 475.58, subd. 2 to convert<br />

the debt threshold that allows a city, county, town,<br />

or school to issue refunding bonds without holding an<br />

election from 1.62 percent <strong>of</strong> taxable to estimated market<br />

value. Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Bonds qualifying for State Board <strong>of</strong> Investment<br />

(SBI) purchase. Section 104 amends Minn. Stat.§<br />

475.73, subd. 1 to convert the maximum limit on <strong>Minnesota</strong><br />

municipal bond purchases by SBI from 3.63 percent<br />

<strong>of</strong> the taxable market value <strong>of</strong> the issuer to the same percentage<br />

<strong>of</strong> estimated market value. Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Definition <strong>of</strong> estimated market value. Section 109<br />

adds a subdivision to Minn. Stat. § 645.44. subd. 20, that<br />

adds a definition <strong>of</strong> “estimated market value” to the general<br />

definition section <strong>of</strong> the statutes. This definition cross<br />

references the amended definitions in Section 25 and<br />

applies for purposes <strong>of</strong> levy, tax, spending, and debt limits<br />

and calculation <strong>of</strong> aid payments. Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

Unless otherwise provided, the sections <strong>of</strong> this article are effective<br />

May 24, 2014, for purposes <strong>of</strong> limits on net debt, the issuance <strong>of</strong><br />

bonds, certificates <strong>of</strong> indebtedness, and capital notes and is effective<br />

beginning for taxes payable in 2014 for all other purposes.<br />

<strong>League</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>Cities</strong>


Article 16: Sales and use and special taxes<br />

• Sales and use tax accelerated remittance repeal.<br />

Section 2 amends Minn. Stat. § 289A.20, subd. 4 to<br />

eliminate the accelerated remittance schedules for<br />

vendors with annual sales tax collections <strong>of</strong> at least<br />

$120,000 for all months except for June collections.<br />

These early remittance requirements for larger vendors<br />

became inactive after the full statutory amounts for the<br />

budget reserve and cash flow accounts were restored in<br />

the February 2012 economic forecast.<br />

Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

Article 17: Property and minerals provisions<br />

• Prohibited activity: assessor’s duties. Section 3<br />

amends Minn. Stat. § 270.41, subd. 5 to modify the list<br />

<strong>of</strong> nontax property appraisals that assessors may perform<br />

within their jurisdictions, so that county assessors are<br />

allowed to do appraisals related to land exchanges. Effective<br />

May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Exempt property used by private entity. Section<br />

5 amends Minn. Stat. § 272.01, subd. 2 to clarify that<br />

taxes on the use <strong>of</strong> federal real property are assessed as a<br />

personal property tax against the user and applies to real<br />

property leased, loaned or otherwise made available to a<br />

user. This change is consistent with the treatment <strong>of</strong> state<br />

and political subdivision-owned property. Effective May<br />

24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Definition <strong>of</strong> person for property taxes. Section<br />

7 amends Minn. Stat. § 272.03, subd. 9 to clarify that<br />

for property tax purposes, the term “person” includes<br />

an individual, association, estate, trust, partnership, firm,<br />

company, or corporation. Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Tax status <strong>of</strong> leased, tax-exempt property owned<br />

by political subdivisions. Section 10 amends Minn.<br />

Stat. § 273.19, subd. 1 to clarify that tax-exempt property<br />

owned by a political subdivision and held under<br />

a lease for a term <strong>of</strong> at least one year, and not taxable<br />

under section 272.01, subdivision 2, or under a contract<br />

for the purchase there<strong>of</strong>, shall be considered for all purposes<br />

<strong>of</strong> taxation as the property <strong>of</strong> the person holding<br />

it. This change makes the treatment <strong>of</strong> leased property<br />

owned by local units <strong>of</strong> government consistent with<br />

the treatment <strong>of</strong> leased property owned by the federal<br />

government, the state <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> and school districts.<br />

Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Definition <strong>of</strong> rural area; electrical cooperatives<br />

per capita tax. Section 12 amends Minn. Stat.§ 273.39<br />

to change the definition <strong>of</strong> rural area to refer to “statutory<br />

cities” and “home rule charter cities.” This technical<br />

change is necessary because the current statute refers<br />

only to “incorporated city,” a designation that no longer<br />

exists. Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Repealer. Section 18 repeals obsolete statutory provisions<br />

including Minn. Stat. § 273.11, subd 1a, the expired<br />

limited market value statute, and Minn. Stat. § 273.11,<br />

subd 22, the expired market value exclusion for property<br />

treated for lead paint removal. Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

(GC)<br />

TELECOMMUNICATIONS<br />

Broadband provisions included in omnibus jobs,<br />

economic development, housing, commerce, and<br />

energy law<br />

Chapter 85 (HF 729*/SF 1057) is the omnibus jobs, economic<br />

development, housing, commerce, and energy bill.<br />

The bill includes a provision establishing the Office <strong>of</strong><br />

Broadband Development under the jurisdiction <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Employment and Economic Development<br />

(DEED). The bill also creates a fiber collaboration database<br />

to coordinate state broadband infrastructure and requires<br />

the broadband development <strong>of</strong>fice to produce a statewide<br />

broadband strategy report. The provisions related to broadband<br />

in the omnibus bill are summarized below:<br />

• Appropriation. Article 1, Section 3, subd. 2(o) appropriates<br />

$250,000 each year in FY2014-15 from the<br />

general fund for the Broadband Development Office.<br />

Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Office <strong>of</strong> Broadband Development established.<br />

Article 3, Section 13 adds a new statute, Minn. Stat. §<br />

116J.998, which creates an <strong>of</strong>fice <strong>of</strong> broadband development<br />

within DEED to encourage, foster, develop, and<br />

improve broadband within the state in order to meet<br />

statewide broadband goals established in Minn. Stat. §<br />

237.012. The director <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fice will be a gubernatorial<br />

appointee. Section 13 also spells out the duties <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>of</strong>fice, Duties <strong>of</strong> interest to cities include:<br />

• Coordinate with state, regional, local, and private entities<br />

to develop, to the maximum extent practicable, a<br />

uniform statewide broadband access and usage policy;<br />

• Provide consultation services to local units <strong>of</strong> government<br />

or other project sponsors in connection with the<br />

planning, acquisition, improvement, construction, or<br />

development <strong>of</strong> any broadband deployment project;<br />

• Encourage public-private partnerships to increase<br />

deployment and adoption <strong>of</strong> broadband services and<br />

applications, including recommending funding options<br />

and possible incentives to encourage investment in<br />

broadband expansion;<br />

• Serve as an information clearinghouse for federal<br />

programs providing financial assistance to institutions<br />

located in rural areas seeking to obtain access to highspeed<br />

broadband service, and use this information as<br />

an outreach tool to make institutions located in rural<br />

areas that are unserved or underserved with respect<br />

to broadband service aware <strong>of</strong> the existence <strong>of</strong> federal<br />

assistance;<br />

• Provide logistical and administrative support for the<br />

Governor’s Broadband Task Force; and,<br />

<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Summaries</strong> Page 67


• Coordinate an ongoing collaborative effort <strong>of</strong> stakeholders<br />

to evaluate and address security, vulnerability,<br />

and redundancy issues in order to ensure the reliability<br />

<strong>of</strong> broadband networks.<br />

• Coordination <strong>of</strong> broadband infrastructure development.<br />

Article 3, Section 14 adds a new statute, Minn.<br />

Stat. § 116J.999, directing the Office <strong>of</strong> Broadband<br />

Development to coordinate, with the Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Transportation, “dig once” efforts to facilitate the costeffective<br />

deployment <strong>of</strong> broadband infrastructure. To the<br />

extent practicable, the <strong>of</strong>fice shall encourage and assist<br />

local units <strong>of</strong> government to adopt and implement “dig<br />

once” for construction or other improvements to county<br />

state-aid highways, municipal state-aid roads, and any<br />

other rights-<strong>of</strong>-way under the local unit <strong>of</strong> government’s<br />

jurisdiction, and to other lands or buildings owned by<br />

the local unit <strong>of</strong> government.<br />

• Fiber collaboration database. Article 3, Section 18<br />

adds a new statute, Minn. Stat. § 161.462, requiring<br />

MnDOT to post upcoming construction projects on<br />

the department’s Web site so broadband providers can<br />

coordinate the installation <strong>of</strong> infrastructure with highway<br />

projects.<br />

• State broadband strategy; report. Article 3, Section<br />

26, (see also, Article 3, section 13, subd. 5 and section<br />

14, subd. 3 <strong>of</strong> the omnibus bill) requires the broadband<br />

development <strong>of</strong>fice to produce a state broadband strategy<br />

report. The report shall include research and recommendations<br />

to improve and promote expansion and efficient<br />

use <strong>of</strong> broadband throughout the state. The report is due<br />

to the Legislature by Jan. 15, 2014.<br />

Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>, unless otherwise noted. (LZ)<br />

Page 68<br />

TRANSPORTATION<br />

I-35W bridge remnant steel disposition provided for<br />

Chapter 93 (HF 1451*/SF 1305) creates Minn. Stat. §<br />

3.7396. It allows the commissioner <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Minnesota</strong><br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Transportation to distribute the remnant<br />

steel from the I-35W bridge collapse once the special<br />

claims process and any litigation is completed to the <strong>Minnesota</strong><br />

Historical Society, survivors <strong>of</strong> the collapse, federal<br />

and state agencies responsible for transportation, colleges<br />

and universities in the field <strong>of</strong> engineering, or other persons<br />

or institutions directly impacted by the bridge collapse.<br />

The commissioner must complete the process <strong>of</strong> distributing<br />

pieces <strong>of</strong> remnant steel within a period <strong>of</strong> six months<br />

from the effective date. After that time, the commissioner<br />

must dispose <strong>of</strong> the remaining steel as surplus property to be<br />

melted down and recycled. The first $22,000 <strong>of</strong> the proceeds<br />

from the disposal <strong>of</strong> the remaining steel will be deposited in<br />

the trunk highway fund, and any additional proceeds will be<br />

deposited in the general fund. Effective May 25, <strong>2013</strong>. (AF)<br />

Omnibus transportation finance act<br />

Chapter 117 (HF 1444*/SF 1173) is the <strong>2013</strong> omnibus<br />

transportation and public safety finance act. The chapter<br />

spends $2.394 billion in FY 2014 and $2.346 in FY<br />

2015. It sets the budget for the <strong>Minnesota</strong> Department<br />

<strong>of</strong> Transportation (MnDOT) and part <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Minnesota</strong><br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Public Safety (DPS), as well as funding<br />

for the Metropolitan Council, for the upcoming biennium.<br />

It makes various changes in base appropriation levels<br />

largely reflecting the governor’s budget proposal, including<br />

increased appropriations for state roads, Driver and Vehicle<br />

Services, and capitol security. It authorizes $300 million in<br />

trunk highway bonds, available in fiscal year 2015, for the<br />

Corridors <strong>of</strong> Commerce program being established. Summarized<br />

below are transportation provisions that may be <strong>of</strong><br />

interest to cities. (Note: Public safety provisions in Chapter<br />

117 are summarized in the Public Safety section <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Summaries</strong>.)<br />

Article 1. Appropriations for FY 2014 and 2015<br />

Article 1 provides a summary <strong>of</strong> all appropriations by fund.<br />

• Airport development and assistance funded.<br />

$13.648 million in 2014 and $13.648 million in 2015 is<br />

for airport development and assistance. This appropriation<br />

is from the State Airports Fund and must be spent<br />

according to Minn. Stat. § 360.305, subd. 4. This amount<br />

represent an approximately $1 million reduction from<br />

the previous biennium. The base appropriation for fiscal<br />

years 2016 and 2017 is $14.298 million for each year.<br />

Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Aviation support and services funded. $6.386 million<br />

in 2014 and $6.386 million in 2015 is for aviation<br />

support and services. This amount represents an approximately<br />

$200,000 increase over the previous biennium.<br />

Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Greater <strong>Minnesota</strong> Transit appropriation provided.<br />

$17.226 million in 2014 and $17.245 in 2015 is<br />

for Greater <strong>Minnesota</strong> Transit. This amount represents<br />

an approximately $3 million increase over the previous<br />

biennium. $100,000 in each year is from the general<br />

fund for the administrative expenses <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Minnesota</strong><br />

Council on Transportation Access under Minn. Stat. §<br />

174.285. $78,000 in each year is from the general fund<br />

for grants to Greater <strong>Minnesota</strong> transit providers as<br />

reimbursement for the costs <strong>of</strong> providing fixed route<br />

public transit rides free <strong>of</strong> charge under Minn. Stat. §<br />

174.24, subd. 7, for veterans certified as disabled. Effective<br />

July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Passenger rail funded. $500,000 in each year <strong>of</strong> the<br />

biennium is provided from the general fund for passenger<br />

rail system planning, alternatives analysis, environmental<br />

analysis, design, and preliminary engineering<br />

under Minn. Stat. § 174.632 to 174.636. This is the same<br />

amount appropriated for this purpose in the previous<br />

biennium. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

<strong>League</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>Cities</strong>


• Freight appropriation provided. $5.653 in 2014 and<br />

$5.153 in 2015 is provided for freight purposes. This<br />

amount is approximately $500,000 more than was appropriated<br />

in the previous biennium. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Safe routes to school activities funded. $250,000 in<br />

each year <strong>of</strong> the biennium is from the general fund for<br />

non-infrastructure activities in the safe routes to school<br />

program under Minn. Stat. § 174.40, subd. 7a. Effective<br />

July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• State roads operations and maintenance funded.<br />

$262.395 in each year <strong>of</strong> the biennium is for operations<br />

and maintenance <strong>of</strong> state roads. This amount is almost<br />

$300 million less than was provided in the previous<br />

biennium. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• State roads program planning and delivery<br />

funded. $206.795 million in 2014 and $206.720 million<br />

in 2015 is for program planning and delivery. This<br />

amount is approximately the same as what was appropriated<br />

in the previous biennium. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Joint Program Office for Economic Development<br />

and Alternative Finance created. $250,000 in<br />

each year <strong>of</strong> the biennium is appropriated for MnDOT’s<br />

administrative costs for creation and operation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Joint Program Office for Economic Development and<br />

Alternative Finance, including costs <strong>of</strong> hiring a consultant<br />

and preparing required reports. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Targeted group business program funded. $130,000<br />

in each year is available for administrative costs <strong>of</strong> the targeted<br />

group business program. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Planning grants provided. $266,000 in each year is<br />

available for grants to metropolitan planning organizations<br />

outside the seven-county metropolitan area. Effective<br />

July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Research contingent account funds provided.<br />

$75,000 in each year is available for a transportation<br />

research contingent account to finance research projects<br />

that are reimbursable from the federal government or<br />

from other sources. for the other year is available for it.<br />

Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Transportation study grant funds provided.<br />

$900,000 in each year is available for grants for transportation<br />

studies outside the metropolitan area to identify<br />

critical concerns, problems, and issues. These grants are<br />

available: (1) to regional development commissions; (2)<br />

in regions where no regional development commission<br />

is functioning, to joint powers boards established under<br />

agreement <strong>of</strong> two or more political subdivisions in the<br />

region to exercise the planning functions <strong>of</strong> a regional<br />

development commission; and (3) in regions where no<br />

regional development commission or joint powers board<br />

is functioning, to the department’s district <strong>of</strong>fice for that<br />

region. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• WorkPlace Telework program funded. $75,000 in<br />

the first year is from the Highway User Tax Distribution<br />

Fund for a grant to the Humphrey School <strong>of</strong> Public<br />

Affairs at the University <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> for WorkPlace<br />

Telework program congestion relief efforts consisting <strong>of</strong><br />

maintenance <strong>of</strong> website tools and content. Effective July<br />

1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Economic recovery completion funds provided.<br />

$1 million in each year <strong>of</strong> the biennium is to complete<br />

projects using funds made available to the MnDOT<br />

under title XII <strong>of</strong> the American Recovery and Reinvestment<br />

Act <strong>of</strong> 2009, Public <strong>Law</strong> 111-5, and implemented<br />

under Minn. Stat. § 161.36, subd. 7. The base appropriation<br />

is $1 million in fiscal year 2016 and $0 in fiscal year<br />

2017. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• State road construction funded. $909.4 million in<br />

2014 and $815.6 million in 2015 are for state road construction.<br />

This amount is approximately $300 more than<br />

was appropriated in the previous biennium. $489.2 million<br />

in 2014 and $482.2 million in 2015 are from the<br />

Federal Highway Administration. $420.2 million in 2014<br />

and $333.4 million in 2015 are from highway user taxes.<br />

Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Transportation Economic Development program<br />

funded. $10 million in each year is for the Transportation<br />

Economic Development (TED) program under<br />

Minn. Stat. § 174.12. The commissioner <strong>of</strong> MnDOT<br />

may expend up to one-half <strong>of</strong> 1 percent <strong>of</strong> the federal<br />

appropriations under this clause as grants to opportunity<br />

industrialization centers and other nonpr<strong>of</strong>it job training<br />

centers for job training programs related to highway<br />

construction. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Transportation Revolving Loan Fund transfers<br />

authorized. The commissioner <strong>of</strong> MnDOT may transfer<br />

up to $15 million each year to the Transportation<br />

Revolving Loan Fund. The commissioner may receive<br />

money covering other shares <strong>of</strong> the cost <strong>of</strong> partnership<br />

projects. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Highway debt service provided. $158.417 million<br />

in 2014 and $189.821 million in 2015 is for debt service<br />

on trunk highway bonds. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Electronic communications funded. $5.171 million<br />

in each year <strong>of</strong> the biennium is for electronic communications.<br />

Of this amount, $3,000 in each year is from<br />

the general fund appropriation to equip and operate the<br />

Roosevelt signal tower for Lake <strong>of</strong> the Woods weather<br />

broadcasting. The remainder is from the Trunk Highway<br />

Fund. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• County state-aid roads funded. $594.883 million in<br />

2014 and $607.505 million in 2015 is from the County<br />

State-Aid Highway fund under Minn. Stat. § 161.082 to<br />

161.085, and Chapter 162. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Municipal state-aid roads funded. $152.219 million<br />

in 2014 and $155.060 million in 2015 is from the<br />

Municipal State-Aid Street Fund for the purposes under<br />

Minn. Stat. Chapter 162. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Flexible Highway Account transfers required. The<br />

commissioner <strong>of</strong> MnDOT must transfer from the Flexi-<br />

<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Summaries</strong> Page 69


le Highway Account in the County State-Aid Highway<br />

Fund: (1) $5.7 million in the first year to the trunk highway<br />

fund; (2) $13 million in the first year to the Municipal<br />

Turnback Account in the Municipal State-Aid Street<br />

Fund; (3) $10 million in the second year to the Municipal<br />

Turnback Account in the Municipal State-Aid Street<br />

Fund; and (4) the remainder in each year to the County<br />

Turnback Account in the County State-Aid Highway<br />

Fund. The funds transferred are for highway turnback<br />

purposes as provided under Minn. Stat. § 161.081, subd.<br />

3. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Metropolitan Council transit operations funded.<br />

$107.889 million in 2014 and $76.97 million in 2015<br />

is appropriated from the general fund for transit system<br />

operations under Minn. Stat. § 473.371 to 473.449.<br />

The base appropriation for fiscal years 2016 and 2017<br />

is $76,686 million in each year. $37,000,000 in the first<br />

year is for the Southwest Corridor light rail transit line<br />

from the Hiawatha light rail transit line in downtown<br />

Minneapolis to Eden Prairie, to be used for environmental<br />

studies, preliminary engineering, acquisition <strong>of</strong> real<br />

property or interests in real property, and design. Effective<br />

July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Trunk highway bond reauthorization provided.<br />

$1.4146 million <strong>of</strong> the amount appropriated in <strong>Law</strong>s<br />

2008, chapter 152, article 2, section 6, for trunk highway<br />

bond sale expenses, which was reported to the<br />

Legislature according to Minn. Stat. § 16A.642, subd.<br />

1, is reauthorized and does not cancel under the terms<br />

<strong>of</strong> that subdivision. This appropriation for the bond sale<br />

expenses and the bond sale authorization in <strong>Law</strong>s 2008,<br />

chapter 152, article 2, section 7, subd. 1, as amended, are<br />

available until Dec. 31, 2019. Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

Article 2. Corridors <strong>of</strong> Commerce bonding provided<br />

Article 2 contains authorization and appropriation <strong>of</strong><br />

$300 million in trunk highway bonds for the Corridors <strong>of</strong><br />

Commerce program (being established in article 3, section<br />

1). The appropriation in this section is for the construction,<br />

reconstruction, and improvement <strong>of</strong> trunk highways,<br />

including design-build contracts and consultant usage to<br />

support these activities. This includes the cost <strong>of</strong> payments<br />

to landowners for lands acquired for highway rights-<strong>of</strong>way,<br />

payments to lessees, interest subsidies, and relocation<br />

expenses. The commissioner may use up to 17 percent for<br />

program delivery. Effective July 1, 2014.<br />

Article 3. Funding policy provisions<br />

Article 3 contains policy provisions related to transportation<br />

and public safety funding. (Note: The public safety<br />

provisions can be found in the Public Safety section <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Summaries</strong>.) Following are transportation provisions<br />

that may be <strong>of</strong> interest to cities.<br />

• Corridors <strong>of</strong> Commerce Program created. Section<br />

1 establishes Minn. Stat. § 161.088, the Corridors <strong>of</strong><br />

Page 70<br />

Commerce Program. It creates classifications for candidate<br />

trunk highway projects, consisting <strong>of</strong> capacity development<br />

projects that add additional capacity to the trunk<br />

highway system and freight improvements. It establishes<br />

basic requirements for whether a project is eligible to<br />

be included in the program, including consistency with<br />

transportation plans, location on an interregional corridor<br />

(for projects outside the Twin <strong>Cities</strong> metropolitan<br />

area), fit in one <strong>of</strong> the project classifications, a time<br />

limit for when the project would be ready to start, and a<br />

maximum project cost. It requires MnDOT to establish<br />

a selection process and criteria for evaluation <strong>of</strong> projects<br />

as well as a cost participation policy for local units<br />

<strong>of</strong> government. It provides for stakeholder recommendations<br />

on candidate projects. It specifies some criteria that<br />

must be included in determining which projects to fund<br />

through the program, including return on investment,<br />

measures <strong>of</strong> commerce impacts, efficiency <strong>of</strong> freight<br />

movement, safety improvements, and project support. It<br />

provides for accounting for future operating costs resulting<br />

from a project funded under the program. It requires<br />

an annual report to the Legislature starting in November<br />

2014 on the program, as well as an independent program<br />

evaluation every other year starting in 2016. Effective May<br />

24, <strong>2013</strong>; however, per Article 2, funds will not be available<br />

until July 1, 2014.<br />

• Center for Transportation Policy funding<br />

increased. Section 3 amends Minn. Stat. § 161.53 by<br />

increasing the cap from $1.2 million to $2 million on<br />

how much funding MnDOT can provide to the Center<br />

for Transportation Studies at the University <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong><br />

for transportation research. Requires research to<br />

be undertaken on transportation policy and economic<br />

competitiveness, which is due by June 30, 2018. Effective<br />

July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• County wheelage tax expansion provided. Section<br />

4 amends Minn. Stat. § 163.051. It broadens the authority<br />

for counties to impose an annual wheelage tax, to: 1)<br />

provide the authority to all counties, expanded from the<br />

current restriction to the seven-county Twin <strong>Cities</strong> metropolitan<br />

area; and 2) set the tax rate at $10 (increased<br />

from $5) to be imposed until Jan. 1, 2018, after which a<br />

tax <strong>of</strong> up $20 can be imposed. Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong> and<br />

applies to a registration period under Minn. Stat. Chapter 168,<br />

starting on or after Jan. 1, 2014.<br />

• “High-value vehicle” definition amended. Section<br />

5 amends Minn. Stat. § 168A.01, subd. 6a. It amends<br />

the definition <strong>of</strong> “high-value vehicle” in the chapter on<br />

motor vehicle titles, to raise the minimum value <strong>of</strong> a<br />

vehicle prior to being damaged in a crash, from $5,000<br />

to $9,000, in order to be considered high-value. This has<br />

the effect <strong>of</strong> reducing the collection <strong>of</strong> vehicles considered<br />

high-value. High-value vehicles are subject to<br />

provisions under section 168A.151 that (1) require an<br />

insurance company to obtain a salvage title on the vehi-<br />

<strong>League</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>Cities</strong>


cle if it was acquired as a result <strong>of</strong> paying an insurance<br />

claim, and (2) require a salvage title on some damaged<br />

vehicle scenarios involving an out-<strong>of</strong>-state title. Effective<br />

July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Vehicle title fees increased. Section 6 amends Minn.<br />

Stat. § 168A.29, subd. 1. Modifies fees for motor vehicle<br />

titling transactions starting in January 2017, to: 1)<br />

raise the fee for new vehicle titles by $2 (going from<br />

$6.25 to $8.25, with no changes made to a $1 technology<br />

surcharge and an additional $3.50 that goes into a<br />

public safety vehicle account), with $0.90 <strong>of</strong> the increase<br />

going to an account that funds Driver and Vehicle Services<br />

(DVS) operations, and the other $1.10 going to the<br />

general fund; and 2) eliminate a $5.50 title transfer fee,<br />

which is currently distributed $2.50 to a DVS operating<br />

account and $3 to the general fund. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Driver’s license renewal fee increased. Section 11<br />

amends Minn. Stat. §171.061, subd. 4. It increases, from<br />

$5 to $8, the filing fee charged for a new or renewal<br />

driver’s licenses and <strong>Minnesota</strong> identification cards. The<br />

same fee amount is imposed by agents authorized by<br />

Driver and Vehicle Services (DVS) to administer driver<br />

licensing <strong>of</strong>fices, and by DVS at its locations. (Filing fees<br />

collected by agents are retained by them, and fees collected<br />

by DVS are deposited in an operating account in<br />

the special revenue fund for DVS program administration.)<br />

Effective Jan. 1, 2014.<br />

• Transportation Economic Development Program<br />

codified. Section 19 creates Minn. Stat. § 174.12. It<br />

codifies authorization and requirements governing the<br />

Transportation Economic Development (TED) Program,<br />

a joint MnDOT/Department <strong>of</strong> Employment<br />

and Economic Development (DEED) program for road<br />

construction related to economic development. It directs<br />

MnDOT and DEED to jointly establish a program for<br />

funding transportation projects that have economic<br />

development impacts. It establishes accounts for the<br />

program in the Special Revenue Fund and the Trunk<br />

Highway Fund. It directs MnDOT and DEED to make<br />

public solicitations for projects and provide information<br />

and technical resources to potential applicants. It requires<br />

DEED to develop performance measures on economic<br />

impacts to use in evaluating projects for inclusion in the<br />

program. It specifies core criteria that must be included<br />

in evaluating projects for inclusion in the program. It<br />

specifies that project selection must be based on the<br />

criteria established, and directs certifications by both<br />

MnDOT and DEED regarding project eligibility. It limits<br />

funds from the program to 70 percent <strong>of</strong> project costs.<br />

It requires geographic balance throughout the state with<br />

respect to both numbers <strong>of</strong> projects and funding levels.<br />

Finally, it mandates a legislative report, due Feb. 1 <strong>of</strong><br />

every other year starting in 2015. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Solar installations made in <strong>Minnesota</strong> requirement<br />

provided. Section 20 creates Minn. Stat. § 174.187.<br />

It requires MnDOT to use solar photovoltaic modules<br />

that are manufactured in <strong>Minnesota</strong> if such modules are<br />

included in a MnDOT construction project. It prevents<br />

the provision from applying if receipt <strong>of</strong> federal funds<br />

requires a conflicting procurement method, or if no<br />

modules are available that fulfill the required function.<br />

• Safe Routes to School expenditure authorized.<br />

Section 21 adds a subdivision to Minn. Stat. § 174.40. It<br />

establishes allowable uses <strong>of</strong> non-bond proceeds funds in<br />

the Safe Routes to School program, to include planning,<br />

education, traffic enforcement, and financial assistance<br />

activities. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Bicycle and pedestrian trail categories required.<br />

Section 22 creates Minn. Stat. § 174.42. It requires<br />

MnDOT to obtain the same or a greater level <strong>of</strong> funding<br />

for certain bicycle and pedestrian trail project categories<br />

in each year compared to the average funding over the<br />

previous four years. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Grade Crossing Safety Account discretion provided.<br />

Section 23 amends Minn. Stat. § 219.1651. It<br />

gives MnDOT discretion in whether to cancel remaining<br />

funds in the grade crossing safety account at the end<br />

<strong>of</strong> each biennium. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Motor vehicle lease tax revenue dedication provided.<br />

Section 24 amends Minn. Stat. § 297A.815, subd.<br />

3. It amends the allocation <strong>of</strong> revenue from the sales tax<br />

on leased motor vehicles, so that for 2014 and 2015 only,<br />

$9 million is allocated to Twin <strong>Cities</strong> metropolitan-area<br />

counties (except for Hennepin and Ramsey) for county<br />

roads and the remainder is provided to Greater <strong>Minnesota</strong><br />

transit. Starting in 2016, the allocation reverts to the<br />

previous formula <strong>of</strong> 50 percent to certain county roads<br />

and 50 percent to Greater <strong>Minnesota</strong> transit. Effective Jan.<br />

1, 2014.<br />

• County sales tax for transportation authority<br />

provided. Section 25 amends Minn. Stat. § 297A.993,<br />

subd. 1. It eliminates a referendum requirement for a<br />

county to impose a local option transportation sales tax<br />

in Greater <strong>Minnesota</strong>, which may instead be imposed by<br />

resolution following a hearing. Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Use <strong>of</strong> sales tax proceeds clarified. Section 26<br />

amends Minn. Stat. § 297A.993, subd. 2. It clarifies eligible<br />

uses <strong>of</strong> proceeds from a local option transportation<br />

sales tax in Greater <strong>Minnesota</strong>, to specifically include<br />

funding transit capital and ongoing operations as well<br />

as projects in the safe routes to school program. Effective<br />

May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Collector vehicle fee increased. Section 29 amends<br />

Minn. Stat. § 297B.02, subd. 3. It raises the flat fee from<br />

$90 to $150 imposed on sales <strong>of</strong> collector vehicles—<br />

including collector fire trucks—which applies instead <strong>of</strong><br />

the motor vehicle sales tax. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Metropolitan Council bonding authority increased.<br />

Section 34 adds a subdivision to Minn. Stat. § 473.39.<br />

It increases by $35.8 million the Metropolitan Coun-<br />

<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Summaries</strong> Page 71


cil’s authority to issue debt obligations to fund its capital<br />

improvement plan for transit and paratransit. Proceeds may<br />

also be used to pay issuance costs (subject to the limit).<br />

Effective May 24 and applies in the counties <strong>of</strong> Anoka, Carver,<br />

Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, and Washington.<br />

• Appropriation authority extended. Section 36<br />

amends <strong>Law</strong>s 2009, chapter 9, section 1 by extending<br />

from <strong>2013</strong> to 2016 appropriations authority for<br />

MnDOT from federal aid received under the American<br />

Economic Recovery and Reinvestment Act <strong>of</strong> 2009<br />

(ARRA). Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Novice driver education improvement task force<br />

created. Section 37 is a <strong>2013</strong> Session <strong>Law</strong>. It creates a<br />

task force to compare <strong>Minnesota</strong> novice driver education<br />

with national group standards and submit a report<br />

to the Legislature, which is due by Aug. 31, 2015. The<br />

task force expires on Sept. 1, 2015, or the day after the<br />

report is submitted. Effective May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Transitway community engagement contract<br />

authorized. Section 38 is a <strong>2013</strong> Session <strong>Law</strong>. It allows<br />

the Metropolitan Council, when it is the lead authority<br />

in a transitway project, to contract with communitybased<br />

organizations to promote community engagement<br />

activities along the corridor. It requires the Metropolitan<br />

Council to report activities related to this provision to<br />

the chairs <strong>of</strong> the House and Senate transportation committees.<br />

Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Transportation infrastructure hiring and recruitment<br />

practices encouraged. Section 38 is a <strong>2013</strong><br />

Session <strong>Law</strong>. It encourages the lead transportation authority<br />

in a transportation project to make efforts to employ<br />

women and minorities and contract with targeted group<br />

businesses owned by women and minorities. It also<br />

encourages MnDOT to increase participation in highway<br />

projects <strong>of</strong> small businesses located in economically disadvantaged<br />

areas <strong>of</strong> the state. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Financial assistance for Northstar Commuter<br />

Rail provided. Section 40 is a <strong>2013</strong> Session <strong>Law</strong>. It<br />

exempts the Greater <strong>Minnesota</strong> transit component <strong>of</strong><br />

the costs <strong>of</strong> Northstar Commuter Rail from a requirement<br />

that financial assistance be provided only to<br />

recipients outside the Twin <strong>Cities</strong> metropolitan area.<br />

Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

(AF)<br />

Special freight distribution authorized for west central<br />

<strong>Minnesota</strong><br />

Chapter 140 (HF 316*/SF 300) creates Minn. Stat. §<br />

169.868. It allows annual permits for truck weights above<br />

the restricted amount in <strong>Minnesota</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Transportation<br />

(MnDOT) District 4 to haul freight to or from<br />

a distribution facility that is constructed on or after July 1,<br />

<strong>2013</strong>. MnDOT District 4 serves Becker, Big Stone, Clay,<br />

Douglas, Grant, Mahnomen, Otter Tail, Pope, Stevens,<br />

Swift, Traverse, and Wilkin counties.<br />

Page 72<br />

• Six-axle vehicles weight limit increase allowed<br />

by permit. Subdivision 1 allows a road authority to<br />

issue an annual permit for a vehicle or combination <strong>of</strong><br />

vehicles with a combination <strong>of</strong> six or more axles to haul<br />

freight and to be operated with a gross vehicle weight<br />

up to: (1) 90,000 pounds; and (2) 99,000 pounds during<br />

the period set by the commissioner <strong>of</strong> MnDOT under<br />

Minn. Stat. § 169.826, subd. 1. The fee for a permit<br />

issued under this subdivision is $300.<br />

• Seven-axle vehicles weight limit increased by permit.<br />

Subdivision 2 allows a road authority to issue an<br />

annual permit for a vehicle or combination <strong>of</strong> vehicles<br />

with a combination <strong>of</strong> seven or more axles to haul<br />

freight and to be operated with a gross vehicle weight<br />

up to: (1) 97,000 pounds; and (2) 99,000 pounds during<br />

the period set by the commissioner <strong>of</strong> MnDOT under<br />

Minn. Stat. § 169.826, subd 1. The fee for a permit issued<br />

under this subdivision is $500.<br />

• Restrictions provided. Subdivision 3 provides that<br />

vehicles issued permits under this section must comply<br />

with all requirements and restrictions in Minn. Stat. §<br />

169.865, subd. 3. A vehicle may be operated under a permit<br />

issued under this section only to haul freight to or<br />

from a distribution facility that is: (1) constructed on or<br />

after July 1, <strong>2013</strong>; and (2) located within the Department<br />

<strong>of</strong> Transportation District 4.<br />

• Deposit <strong>of</strong> revenues provided. Subdivision 4 provides<br />

that revenue from the permits issued by MnDOT<br />

under this section must be deposited in the bridge<br />

inspection and signing account as provided under Minn.<br />

Stat. § 169.86, subd 5b.<br />

Effective May 25, <strong>2013</strong>. (AF)<br />

Omnibus transportation policy act<br />

Chapter 127 (HF 1416/SF 1270*) is the omnibus transportation<br />

policy act. Summarized below are provisions that<br />

may be <strong>of</strong> interest to cities.<br />

• Snow removal authority in uncompleted subdivisions<br />

sunset extended. Section 1 amends Minn. Stat.<br />

§ 160.21, subd. 6. It extends, by one year (until May 2,<br />

2014), authority for MnDOT and local units <strong>of</strong> government<br />

to perform snow removal on roads in certain<br />

uncompleted subdivisions that are not being maintained<br />

by the developer. Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Signage authorization expanded. Section 2 amends<br />

Minn. Stat. § 160.80, subd. 1 by expanding eligible types<br />

<strong>of</strong> businesses to include “attractions” under MnDOT’s<br />

logo sign program for advertising along interstates and<br />

controlled access trunk highways. Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Requirements for businesses in logo sign program<br />

modified. Section 3 amends Minn. Stat. § 160.80, subd.<br />

1a. It makes various changes in the requirements for<br />

businesses that advertise in the logo sign program. It sets<br />

requirements for attractions that are authorized to advertise<br />

under section 2 <strong>of</strong> the bill. Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

<strong>League</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>Cities</strong>


• Trunk highway emergency relief account. Section<br />

5 amends Minn. Stat. § 161.04, subd. 5. It allows funds<br />

in the trunk highway emergency relief account to be<br />

expended for operations and maintenance related to a<br />

disaster. It removes a requirement that account interest<br />

be credited to the account. Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Special account funds usage expanded. Section 9<br />

amends Minn. Stat. § 161.1231, subd. 8. It expands the<br />

permissible uses <strong>of</strong> funds from an account for parking<br />

ramps owned by MnDOT at the terminus <strong>of</strong> I-394 in<br />

Minneapolis. Uses would expand to include work on<br />

MnPASS lanes and associated technology improvements<br />

for users <strong>of</strong> the ramps. Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• MnDOT encouraged to examine property. Section<br />

9 adds a subdivision to Minn. Stat. § 161.44. It<br />

encourages the commissioner <strong>of</strong> MnDOT to examine<br />

all real property owned by the state and under the<br />

custodial control <strong>of</strong> the department to decide whether<br />

any real property may be suitable for sale or some other<br />

means <strong>of</strong> disposal. The commissioner may not sell or<br />

otherwise dispose <strong>of</strong> property under this subdivision<br />

unless: (1) an analysis has been performed <strong>of</strong> suitability<br />

<strong>of</strong> the property for bicycle or pedestrian facilities,<br />

which must take into account any relevant non-motorized<br />

transportation plans or in the absence <strong>of</strong> such<br />

plans, demographic and development factors affecting<br />

the region; and (2) the analysis demonstrates that<br />

(i) the property is not reasonably suitable for bicycle or<br />

pedestrian facilities, and (ii) there is not a likelihood <strong>of</strong><br />

facility development involving the property. The commissioner<br />

must report the findings under paragraph (a)<br />

to the House <strong>of</strong> Representatives and Senate committees<br />

with jurisdiction over transportation policy and<br />

finance by March 1 <strong>of</strong> each odd-numbered year. Effective<br />

Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• County State Aid Highway variance request process<br />

modified. Section 10 amends Minn. Stat. § 162.02,<br />

subd. 3a. It modifies the process for requesting variances<br />

from engineering standards for the county state-aid<br />

highway system, to eliminate publication <strong>of</strong> the request<br />

in the State Register and to only require hearings only<br />

after request denial. Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Municipal State Aid Street variance request process<br />

modified. Section 11 amends Minn. Stat. § 162.09,<br />

subd. 3a. It modifies the process for requesting variances<br />

from engineering standards for the municipal state-aid<br />

street system, to eliminate publication <strong>of</strong> the request in<br />

the State Register and to only require hearings only<br />

after request denial. Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Municipal State Aid money needs formula modified.<br />

Section 12 amends Minn. Stat. § 162.13, subd. 2.<br />

It updates the statute by amending the calculation <strong>of</strong><br />

money needs to eliminate exclusion <strong>of</strong> certain county<br />

roads with a combination designation across road jurisdictions,<br />

which is no longer used. Money needs are used<br />

in a formula-based allocation <strong>of</strong> municipal state-aid<br />

street funds among cities. Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Driving on bicycle lane to pass prohibited. Section<br />

28 amends Minn. Stat. § 169.18, subd. 4. It prohibits<br />

a motor vehicle from passing on the right by driving<br />

in a bicycle lane. (Under the traffic regulations in state<br />

statutes, a “bicycle lane” is a portion <strong>of</strong> the roadway or<br />

shoulder that is marked for use by bicyclists. Minn. Stat.<br />

§ 169.011, subd. 5.) Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Driving on bicycle lane to park authorized. Section<br />

29 amends Minn. Stat. § 169.18, subd. 7. It clarifies<br />

that a motor vehicle may drive in a bicycle lane when<br />

performing parking maneuvers. Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Crossing into bicycle lane authorization clarified.<br />

Section 30 amends Minn. Stat. § 169.19, subd. 1. It<br />

modifies driving rules for making turns that cross into<br />

an adjacent bicycle lane, so that a driver must (1) signal<br />

prior to making the movement, (2) yield to bicycles, (3)<br />

obey traffic control signs and markings. Effective Aug. 1,<br />

<strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Bicycle passenger limits provided. Section 31<br />

amends Minn. Stat. § 169.222, subd. 2. It modifies<br />

requirements on bicycle passengers, including extending<br />

limitations on number <strong>of</strong> passenger to apply to various<br />

types <strong>of</strong> bicycles as well as trailers. Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Riding bicycle at right-hand curb exception provided.<br />

Section 32 amends Minn. Stat. § 169.222, subd.<br />

4. It eliminates a requirement <strong>of</strong> riding a bicycle at the<br />

right-hand curb or edge <strong>of</strong> the road, if riding in a shoulder<br />

or a bicycle lane. Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Bicycle equipment requirements modified. Section<br />

33 amends Minn. Stat. § 169.222, subd. 6. It modifies<br />

bicycle equipment regulations, including expanding lighting<br />

equipment that can be used to meet nighttime bicycle<br />

lighting requirements, permitting coaster brakes, and<br />

allowing a horn or bell on a bike. Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Stopping in bicycle lane prohibited. Section 35<br />

amends Minn. Stat. § 169.34, subd 1. It prohibits stopping,<br />

standing, or parking in a bicycle lane, unless parking<br />

is authorized by posted signs. Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Disability parking alternative authorized. Section<br />

36 adds a subdivision to Minn. Stat. § 169.346. It provides<br />

that, in the event the designated disability parking<br />

spaces are either occupied or unavailable, a vehicle<br />

bearing a valid disability parking certificate issued under<br />

Minn. Stat. § 169.345 or license plates for physically disabled<br />

persons under Minn. Stat. § 168.021 may park at<br />

an angle and occupy two standard parking spaces. Effective<br />

Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Disability parking signage requirement provided.<br />

Section 37 amends Minn. Stat. § 169.346, subd.<br />

2. It requires, in the regulations on signage for disability<br />

parking, that the parking signs be non-moveable, which<br />

would no longer allow a sign that is moveable by authorized<br />

personnel. Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Summaries</strong> Page 73


• School bus drivers prohibited from cell phone<br />

usage while in traffic. Section 38 amends Minn. Stat.<br />

§ 169.443, subd. 9. It amends a prohibition on using a<br />

cell phone for personal reasons when operating a school<br />

bus to include times when the vehicle is part <strong>of</strong> the flow<br />

<strong>of</strong> traffic (such as at a stop light). Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Transportation ombudsperson required. Section<br />

47 adds a subdivision to Minn. Stat. § 174.02. It creates<br />

a position <strong>of</strong> ombudsperson in MnDOT, codified in<br />

statute. It outlines basic powers and duties <strong>of</strong> the position,<br />

sets reporting and appointment requirements, and<br />

restricts the person from holding other positions within<br />

the department as well as from charging a fee for services.<br />

Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Public-private partnership program authorized.<br />

Section 50 creates Minn. Stat. § 174.45. It authorizes<br />

the commissioner <strong>of</strong> MnDOT to establish a joint program<br />

<strong>of</strong>fice to oversee and coordinate activities to<br />

develop, evaluate, and implement public-private partnerships<br />

involving public infrastructure investments. At<br />

the request <strong>of</strong> the commissioner <strong>of</strong> MnDOT, the commissioner<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> Management and Budget, the<br />

commissioner <strong>of</strong> the Department <strong>of</strong> Employment and<br />

Economic Development, the executive director <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Public Facilities Authority, and other state agencies shall<br />

cooperate with and provide assistance to the commissioner<br />

<strong>of</strong> MnDOT for activities related to public-private<br />

partnerships involving public infrastructure investments.<br />

Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Railroad crossing warning sign requirements modified.<br />

Section 53 amends Minn. Stat. § 219.17. It amends<br />

the types <strong>of</strong> uniform signs that can be placed at railroad<br />

crossings, including allowing a yield sign and modifying<br />

terminology for sign types. Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Railroad sign placement modified. Section 54<br />

amends Minn. Stat. § 219.18. It decreases the maximum<br />

distance from a railroad crossing that crossback signs<br />

must be placed and maintained by railroads, from 75 to<br />

50 feet. It provides that MnDOT can authorize a greater<br />

distance. Effective Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Yield signs at railroad crossings authorized. Section<br />

55 amends Minn. Stat. § 219.20. It clarifies when<br />

requirements apply for placing stop signs or yield signs at<br />

railroad crossings, to exclude crossings that are equipped<br />

with flashing lights or with lights and gates. Effective Aug.<br />

1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Bus rapid transit system development authorized.<br />

Section 59 adds a subdivision to Minn. Stat. § 398A.04<br />

It provides that a regional rail authority may exercise<br />

the powers conferred under this section to: plan, establish,<br />

acquire, develop, purchase, enlarge, extend, improve,<br />

maintain, equip, regulate, and protect; and pay costs <strong>of</strong><br />

construction and operation <strong>of</strong> a bus rapid transit system<br />

located within its county on transit ways included in and<br />

approved by the Metropolitan Council’s 2030 Transportation<br />

Policy Plan. This subdivision applies only to the<br />

counties <strong>of</strong> Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey,<br />

Scott, and Washington. Effective May 25, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Diversion pilot program sunset extended. Section<br />

60 amends <strong>Law</strong>s 2009, chapter 59, article 3, section<br />

4, subd. 9, as amended by <strong>Law</strong>s 2010, chapter 197, section<br />

1, and <strong>Law</strong>s 2011, chapter 87, section 1, subd. 9. It<br />

provides that a city or county participating in a diversion<br />

pilot program may accept an individual for diversion<br />

into the pilot program until June 30, 2017. The authority<br />

had been set to expire on June 30, <strong>2013</strong>. The section also<br />

provides that the third party administering the diversion<br />

program may collect and disburse fees collected pursuant<br />

to subd. 6, paragraph (a), clause (2), through Dec. 31,<br />

2018, at which time the pilot program under this section<br />

expires. This authority had been set to expire in 2014.<br />

Effective May 25, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Pedestrian skyway connection required for Central<br />

Station. Section 61 is a <strong>2013</strong> Session <strong>Law</strong>. It<br />

requires the City <strong>of</strong> St. Paul to include construction or<br />

establishment <strong>of</strong> access to a pedestrian skyway system as<br />

part <strong>of</strong> the initial transit line construction <strong>of</strong> the Central<br />

Station on the Central Corridor light rail transit line.<br />

The council and city must ensure that public access to<br />

the pedestrian skyway system is provided by an elevator<br />

located at the site <strong>of</strong> the station. Effective May 25, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

(AF)<br />

UTILTIES<br />

Energy provisions in omnibus jobs act<br />

Chapter 85 (*HF 729/SF 1057) is the omnibus jobs, economic<br />

development, housing, commerce, and energy bill.<br />

It contains a number <strong>of</strong> sections changing electric utility<br />

requirements and regulations, but they apply to investorowned<br />

utilities and not to municipal utilities. Some sections<br />

<strong>of</strong> interest to cities include:<br />

• Article 8 makes fixes to the Property Assessed Clean<br />

Energy (PACE) program that allow repayment to extend<br />

for up to 20 years (previously limited at 10 years) and<br />

clarifies that qualified projects must have been identified<br />

in an energy audit as being cost-effective. Effective May<br />

24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Article 10 includes new policy and requirements related<br />

to solar energy. The new state solar power generation<br />

goal <strong>of</strong> 10 percent by 2030 is found in section 3 and is a<br />

statewide goal, so will include municipal electric utilities<br />

to some extent. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Article 11 prioritizes and incentivizes solar panels made<br />

in <strong>Minnesota</strong> in terms <strong>of</strong> meeting renewable energy and<br />

CIP requirements for investor-owned utilities. Effective<br />

May 24, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

Page 74<br />

<strong>League</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>Cities</strong>


• Article 12 includes municipal power agencies as participants<br />

in planning groups required under sections 1 and<br />

4. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

• Article 13, Section 1 increases the allowable duration<br />

for guaranteed savings contracts done under MN State<br />

§16C.144, subd. 2 on state buildings to 25 years (previously<br />

15 years) to allow for deeper retr<strong>of</strong>its and more<br />

renewable energy options. Effective July 1, <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

(CJ)<br />

<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Summaries</strong> Page 75


BILLS VETOED BY THE GOVERNOR<br />

VETOED: ENVIRONMENT<br />

Legacy spending bill<br />

Chapter 137 (*HF 1183/ SF 1051) allocates the money<br />

from constitutionally-dedicated sales tax funds targeted to<br />

environmental and cultural programs. Gov. Dayton eventu-<br />

ally line-item vetoed two appropriations from the outdoor<br />

heritage fund that went against the recommendations<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Lessard-Sams Outdoor Heritage Council. The two<br />

vetoed line items were $6.3 million to metropolitan parks<br />

in Subd. 5(i) and $3 million for aquatic invasive species<br />

control in Subd. 5(j). (CJ)<br />

BILLS THAT DID NOT BECOME LAW (DNBL)<br />

DNBL-AID TO CITIES<br />

Governor’s proposed changes to local government<br />

aid program<br />

In his budget recommendations released on Jan. 22, Gov.<br />

Dayton proposed an appropriation increase and significant<br />

reforms to the local government aid (LGA) program for<br />

the 2014-2015 biennium. Under the governor’s proposal,<br />

most <strong>of</strong> the current LGA formula would have been discarded.<br />

Each city’s need would have been computed using<br />

an entirely new formula that includes three need factors: 1)<br />

public safety/streets need based on population; 2) percentage<br />

<strong>of</strong> housing built before 1970; and 3) percentage <strong>of</strong> parcels<br />

that are tax-exempt.<br />

The per capita dollars <strong>of</strong> need for each <strong>of</strong> the three<br />

factors would have been added together to arrive at the<br />

city’s total per capita need. The formula then compares<br />

total per capita need multiplied by the city’s population<br />

to the city’s capacity. If there is a gap between need and<br />

capacity, the city would have received LGA. If capacity<br />

exceeds need, the city would not have received LGA. The<br />

formula included an initial $40 per capita increase for each<br />

city currently receiving LGA. For many cities, that initial<br />

increase would have been phased-down over the next four<br />

years as the formula was implemented.<br />

(GC)<br />

DNBL-BONDING<br />

House bonding bill<br />

HF 270 (Rep. Alice Hausman, DFL-St. Paul) is the omnibus<br />

bonding bill, which contained approximately $850<br />

million in bonding projects. The bill failed by a vote <strong>of</strong><br />

76-56, failing to obtain the constitutionally required threefifths<br />

majority for passage. The proposal contained nearly<br />

$119 million in local government projects throughout the<br />

state including: three regional civic centers in Mankato<br />

($14.5 million), Rochester ($30 million), and St. Cloud<br />

($10.8 million); the Children’s Museum in St. Paul ($14<br />

million); $2.5 million for the Park Rapids Upper Mississippi<br />

Center; $1.5 million for a water main improvement<br />

in Eveleth; and $250,000 for the Grand Rapids Regional<br />

Arts Center.<br />

Page 76<br />

The proposal also included $30 million for supportive<br />

housing, $10 million for public housing rehabilitation;<br />

$4 million for wastewater inflow & infiltration abatement<br />

grants; $1 million to Pollution Control Agency for stormwater<br />

ponds (coal tar abatement); $8 million for clean and<br />

drinking water match for USEPA capitalization grants; $20<br />

million for Wastewater Infrastructure Fund (Public Facilities<br />

Authority); and $46.6 million for transportation projects,<br />

including the Local Bridge Replacement Program,<br />

Local Road Improvements (includes TCAAP and Rochester),<br />

and Greater <strong>Minnesota</strong> Transit Assistance (St. Cloud).<br />

(GC)<br />

“Buy American” steel<br />

HF 548/SF 318 (Rep. Carly Melin, DFL-Hibbing and Sen.<br />

David Tomassoni, DFL-Chisholm) would have required<br />

American steel products to be used for any project that<br />

received public funds, including local or state tax revenue.<br />

(PH)<br />

DNBL-BUILDLING CODES<br />

Residential sprinklers<br />

A floor amendment to the Senate omnibus environment,<br />

agriculture, commerce, energy, jobs and economic development<br />

bill (SF 1607) bill would have prohibited the State<br />

Building Code, Fire Code, or local governments from<br />

requiring the installation <strong>of</strong> fire sprinklers in new or existing<br />

single family homes. The prohibition was not adopted<br />

by the conference committee and did not become law.<br />

Gov. Dayton vetoed the same provision in 2011 and 2012.<br />

(PH)<br />

DNBL-DATA PRACTICES<br />

Classification <strong>of</strong> license plate reader data<br />

SF 385/HF 474 (Sen. Scott Dibble, DFL-Minneapolis and<br />

Rep. Mary Liz Holberg, R-Lakeville) would have classified<br />

license plate reader (LPR) data as private data under the<br />

<strong>Minnesota</strong> Government Data Practices Act. <strong>Minnesota</strong> law<br />

enforcement agencies use automated cameras to photograph<br />

license plates and compare the plate numbers to law<br />

enforcement databases. In addition to classifying the data<br />

<strong>League</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>Cities</strong>


BILLS THAT DID NOT BECOME LAW (DNBL)<br />

as private, the bills set limits on how long law enforcement<br />

agencies could retain data that did not result in a “hit” in<br />

one <strong>of</strong> the databases. The House passed a bill requiring the<br />

immediate destruction <strong>of</strong> non-hit data. The Senate bill,<br />

passed by the Judiciary Committee, allowed non-hit data<br />

to be retained for 90 days. The full Senate did not take up<br />

the bill. (Note: LPR data is currently classified as private<br />

data pursuant to a temporary classification issued by the<br />

Information Policy Analysis Division <strong>of</strong> the Department<br />

<strong>of</strong> Administration). Absent legislative action, the temporary<br />

classification expires on Aug. 1, 2015. <strong>Law</strong> enforcement<br />

agencies currently can retain non-hit data indefinitely.<br />

(PH)<br />

Unauthorized data access security policies and penalties<br />

HF 183/SF 211 (Sen. Scott Dibble, DFL-Minneapolis and<br />

Rep. Mary Liz Holberg, R-Lakeville) would have required<br />

municipalities to adopt additional security policies to prevent<br />

the unauthorized access <strong>of</strong> private data by employees,<br />

and would subject municipalities to statutory requirements<br />

regarding the disclosure <strong>of</strong> data breaches that currently<br />

apply to state agencies. As introduced, it also would have<br />

instituted a new gross misdemeanor penalty for certain<br />

data practices violations, and would have required public<br />

entities to post the results <strong>of</strong> investigations <strong>of</strong> unauthorized<br />

access to data on the entity’s website. The legislation was<br />

introduced in response to reports and lawsuits regarding<br />

unauthorized access <strong>of</strong> private data in the driver’s license<br />

database maintained by the Department <strong>of</strong> Public Safety.<br />

(PH)<br />

Creating an exception to the Open Meeting <strong>Law</strong><br />

for social media<br />

HF 653/SF 527 (Rep. Duane Quam, R-Byron and Sen.<br />

Kevin Dahle, DFL-Northfield) would have created an<br />

exception to the Open Meeting <strong>Law</strong> for certain communications<br />

made by elected <strong>of</strong>ficials on social media, such as<br />

Facebook or Twitter. The social media forums would have<br />

to be open to the public, and the forums used by a government<br />

entity would have to be previously identified by the<br />

council at a public meeting and publicly posted. Participation<br />

could not replace any required public hearing or<br />

meeting, and could not be the sole means <strong>of</strong> deliberation<br />

by the public body. (PH)<br />

DNBL-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT<br />

Jobs bill extension<br />

SF 669/ HF 706 (Sen. Ann Rest, DFL-New Hope and<br />

Rep. Mike Nelson, DFL-Brooklyn Center) would have<br />

reinstituted a provision in the 2010 jobs bill (Minn. Stat. §<br />

469.176, subd. 4c) that allows economic development districts<br />

to be used for any type <strong>of</strong> project if the municipality<br />

finds the project will create new jobs in the state, including<br />

construction jobs, and the project otherwise would<br />

not have begun before Jan. 1, 2014, without the assistance.<br />

The additional authority expired on Dec. 31, 2012. The<br />

bill would have reinstituted for 18 months the 2010 jobs<br />

bill provision that allows the use <strong>of</strong> surplus tax increment<br />

financing (TIF) increments to stimulate projects where<br />

construction commences by Jan. 1, 2014 (Minn. Stat. §<br />

469.176, subd. 4m). The authority to spend increments<br />

would have expired on Dec. 31, 2012. (PH)<br />

DNBL-ELECTIONS<br />

Early voting<br />

HF 334/SF 535 (Rep. Connie Bernardy, DFL-Fridley and<br />

Sen. Katie Sieben, DFL-Newport), would have established<br />

an early voting system statewide. The bill would<br />

have defined early voting as “voting in person before election<br />

day at the <strong>of</strong>fice <strong>of</strong> the county auditor or designated<br />

municipal clerk.” The early voting option would have been<br />

made available to any eligible voter for primary, general<br />

and special elections for federal, state, or county <strong>of</strong>fices.<br />

(AL)<br />

Ranked-choice voting<br />

HF 367/SF 335 (Rep. Steve Simon, DFL-Hopkins and<br />

Sen. Ann Rest, DFL-New Hope) would have allowed statutory<br />

cities to adopt and implement ranked-choice voting<br />

(RCV) if approval by the city council. Currently, charter<br />

cities are able to adopt RCV, and Minneapolis and St. Paul<br />

have done so by referendum. RCV allows voters to rank<br />

their candidate choices instead <strong>of</strong> choosing a single candidate<br />

for local, non-partisan races. (AL)<br />

Felon voting<br />

SF 164/HF 637 (Sen. Bobby Jo Champion, DFL-Minneapolis<br />

and Rep. Laurie Halverson, DFL-Eagan) is the bill<br />

containing the recommendations from the Governor’s Task<br />

Force on Election Integrity regarding felon voting rights<br />

and notification. Several provisions were adopted into the<br />

omnibus elections bills and are now law (see Chapter 131).<br />

A key provision that did not become law was the requirement<br />

to notify the adult felon on probation <strong>of</strong> loss <strong>of</strong> voting<br />

rights in writing and signed by the individual. (AL)<br />

June primary<br />

HF 687/SF 898 (Rep. Steve Simon, DFL-Hopkins and<br />

Sen. Jim Carlson, DFL-Eagan) would have changed the<br />

state primary date from the second Tuesday in August to<br />

the first Tuesday after the third Monday in June. (AL)<br />

<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Summaries</strong> Page 77


BILLS THAT DID NOT BECOME LAW (DNBL)<br />

DNBL-EMPLOYMENT LAW<br />

Statewide teacher health insurance pool<br />

HF 573/SF 446 (Rep. John Ward, DFL-Baxter and Sen.<br />

Scott Dibble, DFL, Minneapolis) would have pooled<br />

school employees into a statewide health plan. The proposal<br />

has been a high priority for Education <strong>Minnesota</strong>,<br />

the association that represents public school teachers. Proponents<br />

for the legislation argued that a statewide pool<br />

would lower health insurance premiums for all school<br />

employees. Opponents argued that the measure, if enacted,<br />

would raise costs for many school districts, which currently<br />

have the option <strong>of</strong> negotiating with other districts as cooperatives.<br />

(AF)<br />

Minimum wage<br />

HF 92/SF 3 (Rep. Ryan Winkler, DFL-Golden Valley and<br />

Sen. Chris Eaton, DFL-Brooklyn Center) would have<br />

increased the <strong>Minnesota</strong> minimum wage for large employers<br />

(with business volume in excess <strong>of</strong> $625,000 per year)<br />

from the current $6.15 per hour to $8.35 per hour on<br />

Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>; $9.45 per hour on Aug. 1, 2014; and $10.55<br />

per hour on Aug. 1, 2015. Small employers (with business<br />

volume under $625,000 per year) would see an increase<br />

in the minimum wage from the current $5.25 per hour to<br />

$6.50 per hour on Aug. 1, <strong>2013</strong>; $7.75 per hour on Aug. 1,<br />

2014; and $9 per hour on Aug. 1, 2015. Beginning on Jan.<br />

1, 2016, the minimum wage amounts for both large and<br />

small employers would be increased by the rate <strong>of</strong> inflation<br />

as measured by the consumer price index for all urban<br />

consumers. (GC)<br />

Pregnancy leave<br />

HF 463 (Rep. Phyllis Kahn, DFL-Minneapolis) would<br />

have required an employer to grant an unpaid leave not to<br />

exceed 12 weeks to a female employee disabled by pregnancy,<br />

childbirth, or a related medical condition. The bill<br />

would also have allowed an employee to utilize all available<br />

accrued vacation or sick leave during the leave. The<br />

employer may require the employee to give reasonable<br />

notice <strong>of</strong> the leave. The bill would have also required an<br />

employer to provide reasonable accommodations related<br />

to pregnancy, including but not limited to seating, frequent<br />

restroom breaks, and limits on heavy lifting. The<br />

bill requires the employer to make accommodations<br />

upon request <strong>of</strong> the employee and with the advice <strong>of</strong> a<br />

health care provider. The bill also would have required an<br />

employer to transfer a pregnant female employee to a less<br />

strenuous or hazardous position, with the advice <strong>of</strong> a physician<br />

and upon her request, where the transfer can be reasonably<br />

accommodated. (GC)<br />

Page 78<br />

Prompt payment <strong>of</strong> wages<br />

HF 748 (Rep. Steve Simon, DFL-St. Louis Park) would<br />

have modified the prompt payment <strong>of</strong> wages requirements<br />

in <strong>Minnesota</strong> Statutes, sections 181.13 and 181.14. Under<br />

the bill, an employee who is being discharged or resigns<br />

from employment must be paid all wages at the “regular<br />

rate <strong>of</strong> pay or at the rate required by law, whichever rate is<br />

greater.” This would likely come into play for cities if there<br />

is a dispute about the “regular rate <strong>of</strong> pay” under the terms<br />

<strong>of</strong> a union agreement or a personnel policy. “Regular rate<br />

<strong>of</strong> pay” is not defined under the new law, but there is a<br />

definition <strong>of</strong> “regular rate <strong>of</strong> pay” in the federal Fair Labor<br />

Standards Act that includes nearly all forms <strong>of</strong> compensation<br />

except benefits and expense reimbursements. The<br />

bill would have allowed “compensatory damages” equal<br />

to the amount <strong>of</strong> wages that were earned and unpaid. The<br />

employee’s demand for payment would not have needed to<br />

be in writing or state the precise amount <strong>of</strong> unpaid wages.<br />

The bill also would have clarified that employers cannot<br />

make deductions from wages due at time <strong>of</strong> discharge for<br />

lost, stolen, or damaged property <strong>of</strong> the employer, unless<br />

the deduction is voluntarily authorized by the employee in<br />

writing after the loss has occurred. (AF)<br />

Overtime hour threshold<br />

HF 763 (Rep. Jason Metsa, DFL-Virginia) that would have<br />

reduced the overtime threshold to 40 hours from the current<br />

48 hours. In most instances, this bill would not have<br />

impacted cities because the federal threshold <strong>of</strong> 40 hours<br />

is already required for most positions. However, because<br />

<strong>of</strong> federal exemptions for seasonal/recreational establishments,<br />

there may have been some sectors <strong>of</strong> city employment<br />

impacted by the lower limit <strong>of</strong> 40 hours. <strong>Cities</strong> that<br />

currently take advantage <strong>of</strong> this 48-hour limit for lifeguards<br />

at beaches and outdoor swimming pools or for golf course<br />

employees would have been subject to the same 40-hour<br />

limit as other city employees. (GC)<br />

DNBL-ENVIRONMENT<br />

Water appropriation fee increase<br />

HF 976 (Rep. Jean Wagenius, DFL-Minneapolis) included<br />

an increase to water appropriation fees by $6.1 million<br />

per year. Based on 2010 water use data, the fee would<br />

have generated an additional $2.15 million from water<br />

appropriation fees on municipal systems and an additional<br />

$1.45 million from summer water use surcharges. Agricultural<br />

irrigation and golf courses would have seen their<br />

rates increase by $725,000 and $425,000 respectively. The<br />

remaining $1.4 million would have come from increases to<br />

various industrial permits.<br />

The bill would have also set residential water use fees<br />

at $15 per million gallons. The size <strong>of</strong> the system would<br />

<strong>League</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>Cities</strong>


BILLS THAT DID NOT BECOME LAW (DNBL)<br />

have no longer resulted in a change to the base fee. Nonagricultural<br />

irrigation would have been charged $70 per<br />

million gallons. Agricultural irrigation would have been<br />

billed at $22 per million gallons, and other water uses<br />

would have been charged $30 per million gallons. The<br />

summer surcharge rate paid on the difference between<br />

summer water use and January water use would have been<br />

set at $75 per million gallons. The proposal would have<br />

expanded the summer surcharge window to include May<br />

and September in addition to the current June, July, and<br />

August time period. These fees were not increased in the<br />

final budget agreement, but the groundwater research they<br />

were intended to finance was all funded through the general<br />

fund.<br />

(CJ)<br />

Silica sand mining<br />

SF 786/no House companion (Sen. Matt Schmit, DFL-<br />

Red Wing) would have created an organization similar to<br />

the Iron Range Rehabilitation and Recovery Board, but<br />

focused on silica mining. The legislation would have also<br />

required the completion <strong>of</strong> a statewide Generic Environmental<br />

Impact Statement (GEIS), would have allowed the<br />

extension <strong>of</strong> local moratoria beyond the normal statutory<br />

limits, and would have allowed the Environmental Quality<br />

Board (EQB) to veto government decisions on the need<br />

for the completion <strong>of</strong> environmental impact statements<br />

for any project. Other provisions related to silica sand that<br />

were agreed to by local government organizations were<br />

adopted at part <strong>of</strong> Chapter 114, the omnibus environment<br />

and natural resources budget bill. (CJ)<br />

Silica sand mining<br />

HF 1336/SF 1487 (Rep. Rick Hansen, DFL-South St.<br />

Paul/Sen. Matt Schmit, DFL-Red Wing) would have<br />

imposed a tax <strong>of</strong> $1 per ton is imposed on the extraction<br />

<strong>of</strong> silica sand as well as a separate tax on the processing<br />

<strong>of</strong> silica sand, and this amount is equal to 3 percent <strong>of</strong><br />

the market value <strong>of</strong> the sand. Proceeds from the extraction<br />

tax would have been appropriated to the Environmental<br />

Quality Board. Proceeds from the production tax would<br />

have been divided in equal parts and appropriated to the<br />

commission <strong>of</strong> transportation for road maintenance, the<br />

commissioner <strong>of</strong> natural resources for acquisition <strong>of</strong> certain<br />

lands, and to the Board <strong>of</strong> Water and Soil Resources to<br />

acquire easements preventing mining in wellhead protection<br />

areas. (GC)<br />

State shoreland rules<br />

SF 1089/no House companion (Sen. Tom Saxhaug, DFL-<br />

Grand Rapids) would grant legislative authority to the<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Natural Resources to restart its efforts to<br />

revise statewide restrictions related to shoreland development.<br />

Those rules had previously been completed in draft<br />

form and sent to Gov. Pawlenty, who refused to allow<br />

them to be adopted. The authority has since expired.<br />

The language allowing that process to continue briefly<br />

appeared as an amendment to a different Senate bill, but<br />

was dropped due to a lack <strong>of</strong> support from the governor.<br />

It is likely to be an issue discussed in upcoming legislative<br />

sessions, as the rules have not been updated since the late<br />

1980s. (CJ)<br />

Legislative water commission<br />

HF 1769/SF 1601 (Rep. Peter Fischer, DFL-Maplewood/<br />

Sen. Bev Scalze, DFL-Little Canada) would recreate the<br />

Legislative Water Commission, a joint legislative body<br />

that was phased out in 1994. The group would meet during<br />

legislative interim periods to discuss water policy and<br />

funding issues. The goal is to have a group <strong>of</strong> legislators<br />

from both bodies thoroughly knowledgeable about complex<br />

water issues, and able to provide legislative leadership<br />

on discussions related to those issues during legislative session<br />

debates and discussions. The bill is likely to be discussed<br />

next year as a potential supplemental budget item.<br />

(CJ)<br />

DNBL-LAND USE AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT<br />

Annexation<br />

HF 1425 (Rep. Andrew Falk, DFL-Murdock) would have<br />

created a prohibition on annexation <strong>of</strong> any type occurring<br />

<strong>of</strong> a property that is subject to an orderly annexation<br />

agreement with any other city. The bill would have<br />

also prohibited the use <strong>of</strong> annexation by ordinance if a<br />

parcel has been subdivided from a parcel larger than 120<br />

acres within the previous five years. The bill was first heard<br />

many weeks after the policy committee deadline and was<br />

laid aside by the chair without a vote being taken. It followed<br />

numerous unsuccessful attempts by the same legislative<br />

author to include specific provisions affecting or<br />

canceling annexations occurring next to Ortonville in<br />

other pieces <strong>of</strong> legislation. (CJ)<br />

Partial discharge <strong>of</strong> easements<br />

HF 752/SF 480 (Rep. Debra Hilstrom, DFL-Brooklyn<br />

Center and Sen. Lyle Koenen, DFL-Clara City) amends<br />

Minn. Stat. § 177.225 and would allow a property owner<br />

to petition to have a portion <strong>of</strong> an easement taken through<br />

condemnation discharged if a court finds that any portion<br />

is not being used for the purpose for which it was taken.<br />

The <strong>League</strong>, counties, and the Department <strong>of</strong> Transportation<br />

worked to prevent passage <strong>of</strong> this bill, which could<br />

have resulted in numerous lawsuits over easements that<br />

have been in place for decades. (PH/CJ)<br />

<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Summaries</strong> Page 79


BILLS THAT DID NOT BECOME LAW (DNBL)<br />

DNBL-PENSIONS AND RETIREMENT<br />

Increase in police and fire pension aid<br />

HF 857/SF 935 (Rep. Joe Atkins, DFL-Inver Grove<br />

Heights and Sen. Sandy Pappas, DFL-St. Paul) would<br />

have imposed a surcharge on various insurance premiums<br />

to provide additional funding for the existing police and<br />

fire pension state aid programs. Since reaching its peak <strong>of</strong><br />

$31.7 million in 2006, the revenues collected to fund the<br />

fire state aid program have declined by nearly 31 percent,<br />

or $10 million. Police state aid, which is funded by a tax<br />

on automobile insurance premiums, reached its peak in<br />

2009 at $63.3 million and has since declined to $59.9 million<br />

in 2012, or a drop <strong>of</strong> 5.4 percent. Under the bill, a $5<br />

annual surcharge would have been applied to each new or<br />

renewed homeowner insurance policy and a $5 surcharge<br />

would have been applied to each automobile insurance<br />

policy. The final omnibus tax bill included a $15.5 million<br />

annual state general fund appropriation that will fund<br />

portions <strong>of</strong> the initiatives in this bill without using the surcharge<br />

mechanisms. (GC/PH/AF)<br />

DNBL-PUBLIC FINANCE<br />

Municipal bond interest exemption repeal<br />

HF 1493/no Senate companion (Rep. Ann Lenczewski,<br />

DFL-Bloomington) included a provision that would have<br />

removed the tax exempt status <strong>of</strong> municipal bonds. Without<br />

the tax benefits, interest rates would have increased in<br />

order to be competitive with other bonds and to attract<br />

investors. The increase in bond payments would have<br />

increased the cost <strong>of</strong> construction projects funded by the<br />

bonds, and that cost would flow to local taxpayers. (GC)<br />

DNBL-PUBLIC SAFETY<br />

Photo-cop<br />

HF 487/SF 377 (Rep. Alice Hausman, DFL-St. Paul and<br />

Sen. John Pederson, R-St. Cloud) would have given local<br />

units <strong>of</strong> government the authority to use traffic cameras<br />

to enforce red light violations. The bill would have also<br />

authorized a vendor to contract with a local unit <strong>of</strong> government<br />

to capture images <strong>of</strong> red light runners, review<br />

them, and forward them to the local law enforcement<br />

agency. (AF)<br />

DNBL-TAXES<br />

Nonpr<strong>of</strong>its exempted from city fees and service<br />

charges<br />

SF 1050/HF 781 (Sen. Chris Eaton, DFL-Brooklyn<br />

Center and Rep. Mike Nelson, DFL-Brooklyn Center)<br />

would have exempted institutions <strong>of</strong> public charity, such<br />

Page 80<br />

as defined in Minn. Stat., section 272.02, subdivision 7,<br />

(churches, universities and colleges were not covered by<br />

the bill) from paying fees or charges imposed by a city if<br />

that fee or charge was for a service provided by the city,<br />

and within the most recent five years, the service had been<br />

paid for in whole or in part from revenue raised from the<br />

city’s property tax levy. The definition would have likely<br />

impacted storm sewer charges and street lighting charges<br />

but it could have also impacted special assessments, water<br />

and sewer charges, waste hauling charges, and other current<br />

service charges. In addition, even if a service provided<br />

by a city had been largely paid by fees or charges, any use<br />

<strong>of</strong> property taxes within the past five years to fund that<br />

service would have triggered the exemption for nonpr<strong>of</strong>it<br />

organizations. (GC)<br />

Levy authority to Southeast <strong>Minnesota</strong> Multicounty<br />

Housing and Redevelopment Authority<br />

SF 896/HF 1027(Sen. LeRoy Stumpf, DFL-Plummer and<br />

Debra Kiel, R-Crookston) would have given the Southeast<br />

<strong>Minnesota</strong> Multicounty Housing and Redevelopment<br />

Authority levy authority similar to the authority previously<br />

granted to the Northwest <strong>Minnesota</strong> Multicounty<br />

Housing and Redevelopment Authority. Effective beginning<br />

with taxes payable in 2014 and through taxes payable<br />

in 2019, the Southeast <strong>Minnesota</strong> Multicounty Housing<br />

and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) would have been<br />

allowed to levy up to 25 percent <strong>of</strong> its total levy authority<br />

on its own and without the approval <strong>of</strong> the city or county<br />

in which the authority operates. The remaining 75 percent<br />

<strong>of</strong> the HRA’s permitted levy would have still required the<br />

approval <strong>of</strong> two-thirds majority <strong>of</strong> all its members in order<br />

to levy property taxes as permitted under Minn. Stat. §<br />

469.033. (HC/GC)<br />

Labor peace agreement<br />

HF 1765/SF 1614 (Rep. Mike Nelson, DFL-Brooklyn<br />

Park and Sen. Kari Dziedzic, DFL-Minneapolis) would<br />

have required any public-funded project in Hennepin,<br />

Ramsey, St. Louis, and Olmsted counties that employs hospitality<br />

workers to enter into a “labor peace agreement” as<br />

a condition <strong>of</strong> accepting any public funds. The bill would<br />

have applied to construction and development <strong>of</strong> a hotel,<br />

sports facility, convention center, or cultural facility with<br />

catering or cafeteria facilities. The provision was also carried<br />

in the House omnibus tax bill but was not included in<br />

the final tax conference committee report. A labor peace<br />

agreement is an agreement between a developer and a<br />

labor organization seeking to represent hospitality workers<br />

on qualifying projects. The labor organization agrees<br />

not to picket or otherwise disrupt work on the project,<br />

in exchange for establishing a process for determining<br />

employee preference regarding union representation. Labor<br />

peace agreements have been used on individual projects,<br />

<strong>League</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>Cities</strong>


BILLS THAT DID NOT BECOME LAW (DNBL)<br />

such as the Vikings Stadium, and have been adopted as<br />

municipal ordinances. Minneapolis has a labor peace ordinance,<br />

although the provisions differ from those in the proposed<br />

legislation. (GC)<br />

Sales tax base broadening to clothing<br />

SF 9/no House companion (Sen. Ann Rest, DFL-New<br />

Hope) would have limited the clothing sales tax exemption<br />

to the first $200 <strong>of</strong> any article <strong>of</strong> clothing. SF 11 (Sen. Ann<br />

Rest, DFL-New Hope) would have eliminated the clothing<br />

sales tax exemption entirely and replaced it with an<br />

income tax refund system. (GC)<br />

Homeowner property tax refund<br />

SF 552/HF 677 (Rod Skoe, DFL-Clearbrook and Ann<br />

Lenczewski, DFL-Bloomington) as introduced included<br />

Gov. Dayton’s proposed new property tax rebate for all<br />

<strong>Minnesota</strong> homesteads. The homeowner property tax<br />

rebate would have been equal to the lesser <strong>of</strong> $500 or 100<br />

percent <strong>of</strong> the homestead’s previous-year property tax bill.<br />

According to the budget document, there are approximately<br />

1.5 million homesteads in <strong>Minnesota</strong>, and an estimated<br />

95 percent <strong>of</strong> those homesteads would receive the<br />

maximum $500 rebate. The other 5 percent <strong>of</strong> eligible<br />

homeowners would have 100 percent <strong>of</strong> their previous<br />

year’s property tax bill paid via the state rebate. (GC)<br />

Gov. Dayton’s tax recommendations<br />

SF 552/HF 677 (Rod Skoe, DFL-Clearbrook and Ann<br />

Lenczewski, DFL-Bloomington) as introduced were the<br />

governor’s budget tax recommendations that included<br />

a new fourth tier income tax bracket; modifications to<br />

the corporate franchise tax; a sales tax rate reduction and<br />

base expansion to services, higher-value clothing, digital<br />

goods, and Internet commerce; and a new LGA formula<br />

with an increased appropriation. Note that these bills were<br />

amended to become the House and Senate omnibus tax<br />

bills. (GC)<br />

Tax hearing and notification law changes<br />

HF 1570/no Senate companion (Rep. Paul Marquart,<br />

DFL-Dilworth) would have repealed the current parcelspecific<br />

preliminary tax notice and in its place would have<br />

required local governments with a population over 2,500<br />

to hold an additional public hearing prior to adopting its<br />

proposed levy. Affected cities would have been required<br />

to publish a “preliminary proposed budget” prior to Sept.<br />

1, and then required to hold a public hearing after Sept.<br />

1, but before the proposed levy is adopted, which under<br />

current law must occur by Sept. 15. The bill would have<br />

required that the preliminary proposed budget be published<br />

on the city website, and the public hearing may not<br />

start before 6 p.m., must allow for the public to testify,<br />

must be distributed electronically via television or over the<br />

Internet, and must allow for public input electronically via<br />

e-mail or social media. (GC)<br />

Tax hearing and notification law changes<br />

HF 1724/SF 1563 (Rep. Jim Davnie, DFL-Minneapolis<br />

and Sen. Rod Skoe, DFL-Clearbrook) would have required<br />

that each taxing district provide the following information<br />

at an publicly-noticed hearing prior to Sept. 1, including<br />

the estimated proposed levy, prior final levy, and percent<br />

change; the tax rate for the estimated proposed levy, current<br />

tax rate, and percent change; a statement <strong>of</strong> reason for<br />

the increase or decrease, “including the four most significant<br />

factors resulting in the change, and an accounting<br />

<strong>of</strong> the distribution <strong>of</strong> levy proceeds from the prior year.<br />

Unlike the Marquart proposal above, HF 1724 would not<br />

have repealed the parcel-specific notice required by current<br />

law. (GC)<br />

Local Sales Tax Bills<br />

• Walker sales tax. SF 15/HF 39 (Senator Tom Saxhaug,<br />

DFL-Grand Rapids and Rep. John Persell, DFL-Bemidji)<br />

would have authorized the City <strong>of</strong> Walker to impose<br />

up to a 1.5 percent general sales tax to fund underground<br />

utility, street, curb, gutter and sidewalk improvements.<br />

The bill would have also authorize the city to<br />

issue bonds <strong>of</strong> up to $20 million to pay capital and<br />

administrative costs related to the improvements. (GC)<br />

• Windom sales tax. HF 1417/SF 1207 (Rep. Rod<br />

Hamilton, R-Mountain Lake and Sen. Bill Weber,<br />

R-Luverne) would have authorized the City <strong>of</strong> Windom<br />

to impose up to a 0.5 percent local sales tax to fund the<br />

costs <strong>of</strong> public facilities and the option for capitalization<br />

<strong>of</strong> a revolving loan fund for the Windom Economic<br />

Development Authority. (GC)<br />

• Bemidji lodging. SF 701/HF 1037 (Sen. Tom Saxhaug,<br />

DFL-Grand Rapids and John Persell, DFL-Bemidji)<br />

would have authorized the City <strong>of</strong> Bemidji to impose a<br />

local lodging tax to fund the costs <strong>of</strong> operation, maintenance,<br />

and capital replacement costs for the Sanford<br />

Center. (GC)<br />

DNBL-TELECOMMUNICATIONS<br />

Telecommunications regulation changes<br />

SF 584/HF 985 is a modernization and update to various<br />

sections in Minn. Stat. § 237, <strong>Minnesota</strong>’s telecommunications<br />

statute. The bill defines “advanced services,”<br />

“basic services,” “competitive local exchange carrier,” and<br />

“wholesale telecommunications service.” The bill also<br />

transfers the regulatory duties from the Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Commerce to the Public Utilities Commission. Furthermore,<br />

the bill outlines the regulation <strong>of</strong> local exchange<br />

carriers and advanced service providers to combine local<br />

access surcharge requirements.<br />

<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Summaries</strong> Page 81


BILLS THAT DID NOT BECOME LAW (DNBL)<br />

The bill received an informational hearing in the<br />

House after committee deadlines and is expected to be<br />

heard in the 2014 legislative session.<br />

(LZ)<br />

DNBL-TRANSPORTATION<br />

Municipal street improvement district authority<br />

HF 745/SF 607 (Rep. Ron Erhardt, DFL-Edina and Sen.<br />

Jim Carlson, DFL-Eagan) would have allowed cities to collect<br />

fees from property owners within a district to fund<br />

municipal street maintenance, construction, reconstruction,<br />

and facility upgrades. The street improvement district<br />

authority legislation was modeled after <strong>Minnesota</strong> Statutes,<br />

§ 435.44, which allows cities to establish sidewalk improvement<br />

districts. The authority would have provide a funding<br />

mechanism that establishes a clear relationship between<br />

who pays fees and where projects occur, but stops short <strong>of</strong><br />

the benefit test that sometimes makes special assessments<br />

vulnerable to legal challenges. As introduced, it also did not<br />

prohibit cities from collecting fees from tax-exempt properties<br />

within a district, and the tool could have been used<br />

to mitigate or eliminate the need for special assessments.<br />

A modified version <strong>of</strong> the authority was included in<br />

the initial version <strong>of</strong> the House omnibus tax bill, but the<br />

provision was not included in the final tax conference<br />

committee report.<br />

(AF)<br />

Sales tax on gasoline<br />

SF 1173 (Sen. Scott Dibble, DFL-Minneapolis) included<br />

a new sales tax at the fuel distributor level—which was<br />

suggested by transportation advocates, including the <strong>Minnesota</strong><br />

Transportation Alliance. Proponents <strong>of</strong> the distributor<br />

tax argue that gas tax revenues are declining and any<br />

increase in the per-gallon tax would not only fail to keep<br />

up with inflation, but would decline as fuel consumption is<br />

projected to decrease. The proposal would have decreased<br />

the current 25-cent-per-gallon fuel tax by 6 cents per gallon,<br />

and replace that tax with a 5.5 percent gross receipts<br />

tax on distributors. Due to the fact that the sales tax is<br />

a percentage <strong>of</strong> the price <strong>of</strong> gasoline, the revenue will<br />

increase automatically as the price increases. (AF)<br />

Mini-trucks<br />

HF138/SF 67 (Rep. Bud Nornes, R-Fergus Falls and<br />

Sen. Bill Ingebrigtsen, R-Alexandria) would have allowed<br />

operation <strong>of</strong> mini-trucks on local roads as passenger automobiles.<br />

Although the bill would have provided that a local<br />

road authority may by ordinance prohibit the operation <strong>of</strong><br />

a mini-truck on streets and highways under the local road<br />

authority’s jurisdiction, local jurisdictions would no longer<br />

have had the authority to issue permits for mini-truck use.<br />

(AF)<br />

Gas tax increase<br />

Transportation advocates hoped the Senate’s more substantive<br />

funding package would prevail, but that hope<br />

faded over the final weekend <strong>of</strong> the session. Transportation<br />

advocates had held out hope that a transportation funding<br />

package passed by the Senate on May 10 would prevail in<br />

conference committee. It included an increase in both the<br />

metro area sales tax for transit purposes and the state gas<br />

tax. Instead, the conference committee report contained a<br />

hefty bonding provision, new taxing authority for counties,<br />

and a change in distribution <strong>of</strong> motor vehicle leased sales<br />

tax revenue. (AF)<br />

Page 82<br />

<strong>League</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>Cities</strong>


Appendix A: Estimate Your 2014 Levy Limit<br />

How to Estimate Your City’s 2014 Levy Limit<br />

Preliminary and subject to final review by the MN Department <strong>of</strong> Revenue (revised 6/12/<strong>2013</strong>)<br />

The <strong>2013</strong> legislature enacted a one-year levy limit for cities over 2,500 population that will cover levies<br />

established by cities this fall for collection in 2014. The language on levy limits is contained in the final tax bill<br />

<strong>of</strong> the <strong>2013</strong> session, Chapter 143 (HF 677) and amended in Chapter 144 (SF 1664). This fact sheet is intended<br />

to provide an initial description <strong>of</strong> the levy limit for planning purposes.<br />

Timeline: <strong>Cities</strong> will be required to provide the Department <strong>of</strong> Revenue (MDoR) with the information<br />

needed to calculate levy limits. The first data request will be due July 20th, and there will be other<br />

exchanges <strong>of</strong> information needed throughout the year. The <strong>Minnesota</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Revenue (MDoR) will<br />

be certifying levy limits by September 1, <strong>2013</strong>. <strong>Cities</strong>, in turn, will be required to report by Sept. 30 to MDoR<br />

the maximum amount it plans to levy for special levies. DOR will certify the allowed special levies by<br />

December 10.<br />

Please note that the levy limit exemption that is provided by participation in local performance measurement<br />

and reporting under Minn. Stat. § 6.91 does not apply under this one-year levy limit.<br />

Calculation:<br />

Step 1: Calculate your allowable special levies for taxes payable in 2012 and <strong>2013</strong>. The list <strong>of</strong> special levies<br />

available under this one-year levy limit are a subset <strong>of</strong> the special levies available under previous levy limits.<br />

These special levies are not covered by the levy limit and include levies:<br />

(1) to pay the costs <strong>of</strong> the principal and interest on bonded indebtedness or to reimburse for the amount <strong>of</strong><br />

liquor store revenues used to pay the principal and interest due on municipal liquor store bonds in the year<br />

preceding the year for which the levy limit is calculated;<br />

(2) to pay the costs <strong>of</strong> principal and interest on certificates <strong>of</strong> indebtedness issued for any corporate purpose<br />

except for the following:<br />

(i) tax anticipation or aid anticipation certificates <strong>of</strong> indebtedness;<br />

(ii) certificates <strong>of</strong> indebtedness issued for shortages in the taconite tax distribution under Minn. Stat.<br />

§ 298.28 and Minn. Stat. § 298.282;<br />

(iii) certificates <strong>of</strong> indebtedness used to fund current expenses or to pay the costs <strong>of</strong> extraordinary<br />

expenditures that result from a public emergency; or<br />

(iv) certificates <strong>of</strong> indebtedness used to fund an insufficiency in tax receipts or an insufficiency in<br />

other revenue sources, provided that nothing in this subdivision limits the special levy authorized<br />

under Minn. Stat. § 475.755;<br />

(3) to provide for the bonded indebtedness portion <strong>of</strong> payments made to another political subdivision <strong>of</strong> the<br />

state <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong>;<br />

(4) to fund payments made to the <strong>Minnesota</strong> State Armory Building Commission under Minn. Stat.<br />

§193.145, subd. 2, to retire the principal and interest on armory construction bonds;<br />

<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Summaries</strong> Page 83


Page 2<br />

Appendix A: Estimate Your 2014 Levy Limit<br />

(5) to pay the expenses reasonably and necessarily incurred in preparing for or repairing the effects <strong>of</strong><br />

natural disaster including the occurrence or threat <strong>of</strong> widespread or severe damage, injury, or loss <strong>of</strong> life or<br />

property resulting from natural causes, in accordance with standards formulated by the Emergency Services<br />

Division <strong>of</strong> the state Department <strong>of</strong> Public Safety, as allowed by the commissioner <strong>of</strong> revenue under Minn.<br />

Stat. § 275.74, subdivision 2;<br />

(6) to pay an economic development abatement under Minn. Stat. § 469.1815;<br />

(7) for purposes <strong>of</strong> a storm sewer improvement district under Minn. Stat. § 444.20;<br />

Step 2: Calculate your initial levy limit base. Take the greater <strong>of</strong>: payable 2012 certified net tax capacity levy<br />

plus certified 2012 LGA minus any payable 2012 amounts that would qualify as special levies OR payable<br />

<strong>2013</strong> certified net tax capacity levy plus <strong>2013</strong> certified LGA minus any <strong>2013</strong> amounts that would qualify as<br />

special levies. (Note that for metro cities and cities on the Iron Range, the certified levy is the amount <strong>of</strong> levy<br />

before accounting for any fiscal disparities).<br />

Step 3: Calculate your final levy limit base. Increase your initial levy limit base from Step 2 by 3 percent<br />

(multiply by 1.03).<br />

Step 4: Calculate your levy limit. The levy limit equals your city’s final levy limit base plus any voterapproved<br />

levies to exceed the levy limit under Minn. Stat. § 275.73 minus the total LGA you are certified to<br />

receive in 2014. (Note that no city’s final levy limit can be lower than the greater <strong>of</strong> 2012 or <strong>2013</strong> certified<br />

net tax capacity levies).<br />

Step 5: In addition to the amount <strong>of</strong> the levy limit, a city can levy amounts needed in 2014 for the special<br />

levies identified in Step 1. These are above and beyond the limited portion <strong>of</strong> the city’s levy.<br />

A simple example <strong>of</strong> estimating a levy limit:<br />

• 2012 certified levy ..................................................................................................................$350,000<br />

• Plus 2012 LGA ........................................................................................................................ +$50,000<br />

• Minus 2012 levy that would have been special levies................................................................ -$25,000<br />

2012 Total ..............................................................................................................................$375,000<br />

• <strong>2013</strong> certified levy ..................................................................................................................$375,000<br />

• Plus <strong>2013</strong> LGA ........................................................................................................................+ $55,000<br />

• Minus <strong>2013</strong> levy that would have been special levies................................................................- $30,000<br />

<strong>2013</strong> Total ..............................................................................................................................$400,000<br />

• Initial levy limit base (greater <strong>of</strong> 2012 or <strong>2013</strong>) .........................................................................$400,000<br />

• Final Levy limit base (initial levy limit base X 1.03) ....................................................................$412,000<br />

• 2014 LGA ............................................................................................................................... $75,000<br />

• Levy limit (final levy limit base minus 2014 LGA but not less than the greater <strong>of</strong> 2012 or <strong>2013</strong> certified levy) ..$375,000<br />

• 2014 tax year special levies which can be levied above the limit ................................................ $35,000<br />

• 2014 total levy (limited portion plus special levies)……………………………………………………………………$410,000<br />

Note: voter approved levies assessed against referendum market value can also be added as special levies.<br />

Questions on levy limits?<br />

Contact : Gary Carlson at (651) 281-1255 or gcarlson@lmc.org or<br />

Rachel Walker at (651) 281-1236 or rwalker@lmc.org<br />

Page 84<br />

<strong>League</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>Cities</strong>


Appendix B: City LGA Amounts <strong>2013</strong> and 2014<br />

2014 LGA Estimates<br />

(Based on estimates prepared by the House Research Department)<br />

Governor Dayton signed the <strong>2013</strong> omnibus tax bill into<br />

law as Chapter 143 on May 23, <strong>2013</strong>. This chapter contains<br />

the first significant reform to the LGA program since<br />

2003 as well as an increase to the appropriation for city aid<br />

payments.<br />

For 2014, the LGA distribution will be at $507.6<br />

million, an $80.1 million increase over the <strong>2013</strong> certified<br />

level. In both 2015 and 2016, the appropriation grows<br />

by an additional $1.5 million (to $509.1 million and to<br />

$511.6 million respectively). Beyond 2016, the distribution<br />

is currently set to remain at $511.6 million. For comparison,<br />

in 2002 when LGA received the highest level <strong>of</strong> state<br />

funding, the formula distributed $565 million to cities<br />

across the state.<br />

The LGA calculation will continue to utilize a comparison<br />

<strong>of</strong> each city’s “need” as measured by a variety <strong>of</strong><br />

demographic factors with its “capacity” as measured by the<br />

city’s adjusted net tax capacity multiplied by the statewide<br />

average city tax rate. If a city is unable to fund its defined<br />

“need” based on its defined “capacity,” the city will receive<br />

LGA. The amount <strong>of</strong> that need-capacity gap that is filled<br />

depends on the overall size <strong>of</strong> the pool <strong>of</strong> money to be<br />

distributed. The share <strong>of</strong> the gap filled by LGA is the same<br />

for all cities that receive LGA. If a city has no gap or if<br />

capacity exceeds its need, the city will not receive LGA.<br />

The changes to the formula made in the <strong>2013</strong> tax bill<br />

focus largely on defining city need.<br />

The LGA formula will now include three calculations<br />

<strong>of</strong> need based on city size.<br />

• For cities under 2,500 population: each city’s need is<br />

simply a per capita amount starting at $410 per capita<br />

and increasing to $630 per capita as city population size<br />

increases.<br />

• For cities between 2,500 and 10,000 population: three<br />

factors will be used in the calculation <strong>of</strong> city need; 1)<br />

the percent <strong>of</strong> the city’s housing stock built before 1940,<br />

2) the average household size, and 3) the population<br />

decline (percentage) from the city’s peak population <strong>of</strong><br />

the last forty years.<br />

• For cities over 10,000 population: four factors will be<br />

used in the calculation <strong>of</strong> city need; 1) the number <strong>of</strong><br />

jobs per capita, 2) the age <strong>of</strong> housing stock (defined as<br />

the percent <strong>of</strong> housing built before 1940, 3) the percent<br />

<strong>of</strong> housing built between 1940 and 1970, and 4) a sparsity<br />

adjustment for cities with less than 150 residents per<br />

square mile.<br />

For 2014 only, no city can receive less LGA than it<br />

is set to receive in <strong>2013</strong>. Beginning with aid payments in<br />

2015, city aid amounts can decrease if a city’s current year<br />

LGA exceeds its calculated need. Similar to recent formulas,<br />

there are limits to how much a city’s aid can decrease:<br />

the lesser <strong>of</strong> 5 percent <strong>of</strong> the previous year’s levy or $10<br />

per capita.<br />

Columns in the spreadsheet<br />

Column 1: City 2011 population from the state<br />

demographer<br />

Column 2: Certified <strong>2013</strong> LGA amount<br />

Column 3: Estimate <strong>of</strong> 2014 LGA without the changes<br />

made by the <strong>2013</strong> tax bill<br />

Column 4: Estimate <strong>of</strong> 2014 LGA under Chapter 143 (the<br />

omnibus tax bill)<br />

Column 5: Change from <strong>2013</strong> certified to 2014 estimate<br />

under Chapter 143<br />

<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Summaries</strong> Prepared by LMC with data from House Research<br />

Page 85


Page 86 Prepared by LMC with data from House Research<br />

<strong>League</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>Cities</strong><br />

2011 Population <strong>2013</strong> LGA<br />

2014 LGA<br />

–old law<br />

ADA 1,710 571,600 554,500 608,356 +36,756<br />

ADAMS 792 208,384 200,464 242,067 +33,683<br />

ADRIAN 1,208 362,303 350,223 402,591 +40,288<br />

AFTON 2,887 0 0 0 +0<br />

AITKIN 2,160 732,618 711,018 751,451 +18,833<br />

AKELEY 430 48,881 45,050 64,597 +15,716<br />

ALBANY 2,590 627,315 601,415 688,864 +61,549<br />

ALBERT LEA 17,994 4,724,618 4,544,678 5,158,700 +434,082<br />

ALBERTA 100 28,357 27,521 28,357 +0<br />

ALBERTVILLE 7,114 0 0 79,647 +79,647<br />

ALDEN 662 145,081 138,461 176,337 +31,256<br />

ALDRICH 48 6,423 6,245 7,012 +589<br />

ALEXANDRIA 12,920 1,204,947 1,075,747 1,463,774 +258,827<br />

ALPHA 116 35,367 34,207 35,810 +443<br />

ALTURA 492 43,918 41,855 65,612 +21,694<br />

ALVARADO 366 55,149 54,003 72,853 +17,704<br />

AMBOY 533 125,545 120,215 140,679 +15,134<br />

ANDOVER 30,847 0 47,632 74,651 +74,651<br />

ANNANDALE 3,280 260,224 227,424 392,480 +132,256<br />

ANOKA 17,331 901,095 1,486,706 1,547,441 +646,346<br />

APPLE VALLEY 49,801 0 0 0 +0<br />

APPLETON 1,403 876,061 862,031 876,061 +0<br />

ARCO 74 24,655 23,915 24,655 +0<br />

ARDEN HILLS 9,381 0 0 0 +0<br />

ARGYLE 643 197,165 190,735 217,106 +19,941<br />

ARLINGTON 2,231 636,892 614,582 714,403 +77,511<br />

ASHBY 448 102,139 97,659 114,761 +12,622<br />

ASKOV 363 64,584 61,688 76,684 +12,100<br />

ATWATER 1,131 237,341 254,002 289,779 +52,438<br />

AUDUBON 522 98,560 95,402 116,671 +18,111<br />

AURORA 1,679 605,415 588,625 634,982 +29,567<br />

AUSTIN 24,803 7,122,450 6,874,420 7,878,815 +756,365<br />

AVOCA 143 26,223 24,793 26,223 +0<br />

AVON 1,403 209,935 233,012 261,866 +51,931<br />

BABBITT 1,465 299,542 286,671 347,806 +48,264<br />

BACKUS 246 28,410 26,619 28,661 +251<br />

BADGER 369 100,302 96,612 108,959 +8,657<br />

BAGLEY 1,404 384,402 382,233 435,634 +51,232<br />

BALATON 645 198,557 192,107 218,927 +20,370<br />

BARNESVILLE 2,588 655,766 629,886 754,097 +98,331<br />

BARNUM 614 128,897 123,497 152,226 +23,329<br />

BARRETT 414 57,809 59,776 73,696 +15,887<br />

BARRY 16 2,476 2,351 2,476 +0<br />

BATTLE LAKE 877 42,044 53,195 74,206 +32,162<br />

BAUDETTE 1,111 289,939 278,829 297,714 +7,775<br />

BAXTER 7,620 0 0 0 +0<br />

BAYPORT 3,525 335,228 299,978 483,255 +148,027<br />

BEARDSLEY 230 74,065 71,765 74,065 +0<br />

BEAVER BAY 181 12,520 10,710 12,520 +0<br />

BEAVER CREEK 298 40,424 39,937 48,215 +7,791<br />

BECKER 4,581 0 0 0 +0<br />

BEJOU 91 19,645 18,735 19,921 +276<br />

BELGRADE 748 180,345 172,865 211,021 +30,676<br />

BELLE PLAINE 6,621 54,473 21,799 267,356 +212,883<br />

2014 LGA<br />

–Ch 143 Change 2011 Population <strong>2013</strong> LGA<br />

2014 LGA<br />

–old law<br />

2014 LGA<br />

–Ch 143<br />

Change<br />

BELLECHESTER 176 17,774 16,989 21,312 +3,538<br />

BELLINGHAM 167 61,143 59,473 61,143 +0<br />

BELTRAMI 107 25,817 24,747 25,817 +0<br />

BELVIEW 383 103,367 99,537 114,645 +11,278<br />

BEMIDJI 13,528 2,906,194 2,770,914 3,211,265 +305,071<br />

BENA 118 27,257 26,141 29,545 +2,288<br />

BENSON 3,223 776,650 744,420 947,350 +170,700<br />

BERTHA 498 132,871 127,891 149,117 +16,246<br />

BETHEL 466 35,117 34,819 46,105 +10,988<br />

BIG FALLS 235 67,827 65,477 70,673 +2,846<br />

BIG LAKE 10,164 156,014 491,839 481,526 +325,512<br />

BIGELOW 236 49,185 47,268 55,154 +5,969<br />

BIGFORK 443 80,363 75,933 94,302 +13,939<br />

BINGHAM LAKE 125 26,063 24,813 26,063 +0<br />

BIRCHWOOD 870 0 0 0 +0<br />

BIRD ISLAND 1,032 370,344 360,024 388,605 +18,261<br />

BISCAY 113 12,234 12,555 16,048 +3,814<br />

BIWABIK 987 263,385 253,515 263,385 +0<br />

BLACKDUCK 797 205,021 197,051 238,784 +33,763<br />

BLAINE 58,331 0 0 0 +0<br />

BLOMKEST 158 16,533 15,307 19,001 +2,468<br />

BLOOMING PRAIRIE 1,993 647,677 627,747 695,248 +47,571<br />

BLOOMINGTON 83,671 0 0 403,931 +403,931<br />

BLUE EARTH 3,348 1,535,819 1,502,339 1,772,985 +237,166<br />

BLUFFTON 206 32,101 31,431 36,201 +4,100<br />

BOCK 106 15,437 15,010 16,169 +732<br />

BORUP 113 17,772 17,777 20,957 +3,185<br />

BOVEY 801 251,002 242,992 274,750 +23,748<br />

BOWLUS 292 36,888 37,622 48,049 +11,161<br />

BOY RIVER 47 4,648 4,549 6,722 +2,074<br />

BOYD 174 65,766 64,026 65,766 +0<br />

BRAHAM 1,812 465,196 475,202 549,404 +84,208<br />

BRAINERD 13,606 3,637,320 3,501,260 4,019,514 +382,194<br />

BRANDON 491 86,841 82,202 99,765 +12,924<br />

BRECKENRIDGE 3,377 1,168,004 1,134,234 1,442,079 +274,075<br />

BREEZY POINT 2,388 0 0 0 +0<br />

BREWSTER 470 180,836 176,478 180,836 +0<br />

BRICELYN 368 122,801 119,121 127,624 +4,823<br />

BROOK PARK 139 17,784 16,525 20,633 +2,849<br />

BROOKLYN CENTER 30,204 411,378 1,317,891 1,352,393 +941,015<br />

BROOKLYN PARK 76,238 0 1,441,081 1,022,502 +1,022,502<br />

BROOKS 142 28,524 27,610 30,220 +1,696<br />

BROOKSTON 141 6,665 6,626 11,105 +4,440<br />

BROOTEN 745 138,694 136,839 170,024 +31,330<br />

BROWERVILLE 791 206,697 198,787 237,343 +30,646<br />

BROWNS VALLEY 583 357,430 351,600 357,430 +0<br />

BROWNSDALE 677 168,304 162,065 199,427 +31,123<br />

BROWNSVILLE 462 58,162 55,206 65,697 +7,535<br />

BROWNTON 759 230,476 222,886 264,769 +34,293<br />

BRUNO 102 17,945 16,925 18,404 +459<br />

BUCKMAN 277 18,509 21,212 28,598 +10,089<br />

BUFFALO 15,580 145,886 711,067 636,249 +490,363<br />

BUFFALO LAKE 723 203,623 196,393 225,545 +21,922<br />

BUHL 998 326,569 316,589 354,761 +28,192<br />

Appendix B: 2014 LGA Estimates


<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Summaries</strong> Prepared by LMC with data from House Research<br />

Page 87<br />

2011 Population <strong>2013</strong> LGA<br />

2014 LGA<br />

–old law<br />

BURNSVILLE 60,664 0 0 85,825 +85,825<br />

BURTRUM 144 27,162 26,124 31,076 +3,914<br />

BUTTERFIELD 586 160,498 154,638 187,035 +26,537<br />

BYRON 4,952 136,035 95,100 257,063 +121,028<br />

CALEDONIA 2,851 832,011 803,501 936,661 +104,650<br />

CALLAWAY 236 34,220 32,208 41,902 +7,682<br />

CALUMET 366 118,691 115,031 120,051 +1,360<br />

CAMBRIDGE 8,194 426,004 538,638 689,424 +263,420<br />

CAMPBELL 159 58,644 57,054 58,644 +0<br />

CANBY 1,781 664,915 647,105 702,405 +37,490<br />

CANNON FALLS 4,082 469,740 428,920 616,263 +146,523<br />

CANTON 346 78,420 74,960 86,599 +8,179<br />

CARLOS 499 47,513 55,451 71,454 +23,941<br />

CARLTON 861 226,274 217,664 251,382 +25,108<br />

CARVER 3,831 40,299 1,989 68,063 +27,764<br />

CASS LAKE 764 411,951 404,311 411,951 +0<br />

CEDAR MILLS 45 5,968 5,847 6,378 +410<br />

CENTER CITY 629 26,951 23,724 37,282 +10,331<br />

CENTERVILLE 3,804 0 0 53,441 +53,441<br />

CEYLON 362 127,725 124,105 133,908 +6,183<br />

CHAMPLIN 23,223 0 392,715 237,521 +237,521<br />

CHANDLER 267 68,662 65,992 68,662 +0<br />

CHANHASSEN 23,247 0 0 0 +0<br />

CHASKA 24,002 37,441 310,374 462,648 +425,207<br />

CHATFIELD 2,784 666,960 639,120 751,019 +84,059<br />

CHICKAMAW BEACH 110 0 0 0 +0<br />

CHISAGO CITY 4,974 0 0 122,925 +122,925<br />

CHISHOLM 4,997 2,711,002 2,661,032 3,063,733 +352,731<br />

CHOKIO 392 119,050 115,130 125,027 +5,977<br />

CIRCLE PINES 4,922 152,142 168,545 314,421 +162,279<br />

CLARA CITY 1,349 358,536 345,046 396,078 +37,542<br />

CLAREMONT 550 153,171 147,671 158,316 +5,145<br />

CLARISSA 682 157,119 150,299 192,829 +35,710<br />

CLARKFIELD 857 344,785 336,215 356,735 +11,950<br />

CLARKS GROVE 701 165,361 159,628 194,227 +28,866<br />

CLEAR LAKE 550 23,234 28,465 43,154 +19,920<br />

CLEARBROOK 521 146,914 141,704 161,596 +14,682<br />

CLEARWATER 1,749 209,623 262,846 272,862 +63,239<br />

CLEMENTS 152 33,903 32,494 35,504 +1,601<br />

CLEVELAND 717 124,558 119,058 153,988 +29,430<br />

CLIMAX 267 43,962 41,292 53,856 +9,894<br />

CLINTON 445 137,750 133,300 149,108 +11,358<br />

CLITHERALL 111 16,870 17,721 20,075 +3,205<br />

CLONTARF 159 22,120 21,618 23,664 +1,544<br />

CLOQUET 12,144 1,968,020 1,846,580 2,299,108 +331,088<br />

COATES 160 0 0 0 +0<br />

COBDEN 36 3,505 3,381 3,505 +0<br />

COHASSET 2,706 0 0 0 +0<br />

COKATO 2,721 435,043 407,833 556,239 +121,196<br />

COLD SPRING 4,040 456,875 416,475 590,142 +133,267<br />

COLERAINE 1,977 351,624 397,364 390,663 +39,039<br />

COLOGNE 1,531 149,495 169,273 193,122 +43,627<br />

COLUMBIA HEIGHTS 19,619 895,180 819,007 1,404,151 +508,971<br />

COLUMBUS 3,919 0 0 0 +0<br />

2014 LGA<br />

–Ch 143 Change 2011 Population <strong>2013</strong> LGA<br />

2014 LGA<br />

–old law<br />

2014 LGA<br />

–Ch 143<br />

Change<br />

COMFREY 382 99,593 95,773 105,802 +6,209<br />

COMSTOCK 94 16,780 16,119 16,780 +0<br />

CONGER 147 19,961 18,491 24,200 +4,239<br />

COOK 574 156,578 150,838 160,936 +4,358<br />

COON RAPIDS 61,766 0 497,492 934,494 +934,494<br />

CORCORAN 5,390 0 0 10,454 +10,454<br />

CORRELL 34 8,253 7,913 8,280 +27<br />

COSMOS 467 128,232 123,562 141,232 +13,000<br />

COTTAGE GROVE 34,828 0 0 59,623 +59,623<br />

COTTONWOOD 1,212 259,768 247,648 293,138 +33,370<br />

COURTLAND 606 61,726 59,320 75,819 +14,093<br />

CROMWELL 238 24,038 22,976 26,305 +2,267<br />

CROOKSTON 7,878 3,056,748 2,977,968 3,512,390 +455,642<br />

CROSBY 2,389 756,240 732,350 814,739 +58,499<br />

CROSSLAKE 2,158 0 0 0 +0<br />

CRYSTAL 22,168 1,455,066 1,233,386 1,643,820 +188,754<br />

CURRIE 231 68,556 66,246 69,999 +1,443<br />

CUYUNA 334 2,164 1,171 7,755 +5,591<br />

CYRUS 287 75,669 72,799 81,155 +5,486<br />

DAKOTA 320 34,858 34,153 41,819 +6,961<br />

DALTON 253 47,177 44,978 55,156 +7,979<br />

DANUBE 496 133,480 128,520 147,646 +14,166<br />

DANVERS 96 9,517 8,987 9,517 +0<br />

DARFUR 109 38,379 37,292 38,379 +0<br />

DARWIN 351 37,512 36,836 46,516 +9,004<br />

DASSEL 1,473 301,387 319,469 359,721 +58,334<br />

DAWSON 1,533 540,099 524,769 575,227 +35,128<br />

DAYTON 4,743 0 0 30,581 +30,581<br />

DEEPHAVEN 3,643 0 0 0 +0<br />

DEER CREEK 323 57,092 54,497 66,317 +9,225<br />

DEER RIVER 929 281,538 272,248 308,879 +27,341<br />

DEERWOOD 534 2,495 3,091 10,833 +8,338<br />

DEGRAFF 112 24,544 23,862 24,544 +0<br />

DELANO 5,510 0 68,751 177,696 +177,696<br />

DELAVAN 177 48,781 47,011 48,781 +0<br />

DELHI 69 15,650 14,960 15,650 +0<br />

DELLWOOD 1,064 0 0 0 +0<br />

DENHAM 37 234 234 234 +0<br />

DENNISON 212 8,798 10,630 10,617 +1,819<br />

DENT 192 41,956 40,791 44,787 +2,831<br />

DETROIT LAKES 8,716 690,536 603,376 782,184 +91,648<br />

DEXTER 340 70,342 66,942 72,139 +1,797<br />

DILWORTH 4,075 493,847 453,097 603,803 +109,956<br />

DODGE CENTER 2,688 624,915 598,035 682,356 +57,441<br />

DONALDSON 42 4,638 4,444 4,844 +206<br />

DONNELLY 240 50,497 48,477 54,194 +3,697<br />

DORAN 55 12,030 11,505 13,133 +1,103<br />

DOVER 741 93,649 90,079 129,012 +35,363<br />

DOVRAY 57 13,705 13,192 13,705 +0<br />

DULUTH 86,256 27,437,478 27,137,478 29,030,564 +1,593,086<br />

DUMONT 97 19,699 18,729 19,699 +0<br />

DUNDAS 1,402 87,420 144,119 149,681 +62,261<br />

DUNDEE 68 21,200 20,520 21,200 +0<br />

DUNNELL 165 61,112 59,462 61,112 +0<br />

Appendix B: 2014 LGA Estimates


Page 88 Prepared by LMC with data from House Research<br />

<strong>League</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>Cities</strong><br />

2011 Population <strong>2013</strong> LGA<br />

2014 LGA<br />

–old law<br />

EAGAN 64,456 0 0 0 +0<br />

EAGLE BEND 532 156,373 151,053 172,137 +15,764<br />

EAGLE LAKE 2,482 510,589 495,634 599,948 +89,359<br />

EAST BETHEL 11,783 0 0 23,469 +23,469<br />

EAST GRAND FORKS 8,590 2,471,550 2,385,650 2,510,643 +39,093<br />

EAST GULL LAKE 992 0 0 0 +0<br />

EASTON 199 31,062 29,072 33,834 +2,772<br />

ECHO 272 70,726 68,006 73,911 +3,185<br />

EDEN PRAIRIE 61,151 0 0 0 +0<br />

EDEN VALLEY 1,046 228,099 217,639 276,644 +48,545<br />

EDGERTON 1,184 293,365 281,525 333,396 +40,031<br />

EDINA 48,262 0 0 0 +0<br />

EFFIE 123 9,800 10,917 13,283 +3,483<br />

EITZEN 242 32,958 31,707 37,749 +4,791<br />

ELBA 155 29,764 29,231 29,764 +0<br />

ELBOW LAKE 1,167 349,082 337,412 388,697 +39,615<br />

ELGIN 1,095 281,551 274,433 320,523 +38,972<br />

ELIZABETH 173 29,650 28,169 34,936 +5,286<br />

ELK RIVER 23,101 0 686,820 225,882 +225,882<br />

ELKO NEW MARKET 4,240 164,986 122,586 206,679 +41,693<br />

ELKTON 141 11,799 10,945 13,618 +1,819<br />

ELLENDALE 691 124,811 119,038 160,349 +35,538<br />

ELLSWORTH 456 161,977 157,417 168,787 +6,810<br />

ELMDALE 116 5,281 4,994 7,947 +2,666<br />

ELMORE 665 216,939 210,289 240,515 +23,576<br />

ELROSA 212 24,938 24,142 29,762 +4,824<br />

ELY 3,473 1,713,366 1,678,636 2,053,883 +340,517<br />

ELYSIAN 657 20,524 15,377 20,524 +0<br />

EMILY 816 0 0 0 +0<br />

EMMONS 388 80,748 76,868 93,587 +12,839<br />

ERHARD 148 25,909 24,946 28,668 +2,759<br />

ERSKINE 504 95,104 99,068 119,203 +24,099<br />

EVAN 84 14,726 14,318 15,198 +472<br />

EVANSVILLE 609 119,255 113,165 146,956 +27,701<br />

EVELETH 3,711 2,186,891 2,149,781 2,524,120 +337,229<br />

EXCELSIOR 2,203 0 0 0 +0<br />

EYOTA 1,995 422,699 409,444 494,543 +71,844<br />

FAIRFAX 1,225 398,946 386,696 439,940 +40,994<br />

FAIRMONT 10,631 3,722,165 3,615,855 3,740,908 +18,743<br />

FALCON HEIGHTS 5,385 310,126 337,752 523,012 +212,886<br />

FARIBAULT 23,409 4,772,748 4,538,658 5,290,238 +517,490<br />

FARMINGTON 21,369 0 258,767 245,317 +245,317<br />

FARWELL 52 14,192 13,672 14,192 +0<br />

FEDERAL DAM 107 0 0 0 +0<br />

FELTON 177 25,659 23,889 29,195 +3,536<br />

FERGUS FALLS 13,103 3,563,824 3,432,794 3,622,946 +59,122<br />

FERTILE 840 259,982 251,582 288,564 +28,582<br />

FIFTY LAKES 390 0 0 0 +0<br />

FINLAYSON 316 34,625 33,107 42,008 +7,383<br />

FISHER 433 70,862 68,293 89,868 +19,006<br />

FLENSBURG 227 20,587 20,627 27,322 +6,735<br />

FLOODWOOD 531 133,152 127,842 151,208 +18,056<br />

FLORENCE 39 9,193 9,976 9,602 +409<br />

FOLEY 2,612 634,131 608,011 725,335 +91,204<br />

2014 LGA<br />

–Ch 143 Change 2011 Population <strong>2013</strong> LGA<br />

2014 LGA<br />

–old law<br />

2014 LGA<br />

–Ch 143<br />

Change<br />

FORADA 185 0 0 0 +0<br />

FOREST LAKE 18,591 0 0 56,002 +56,002<br />

FORESTON 529 68,533 69,120 92,985 +24,452<br />

FORT RIPLEY 69 0 0 0 +0<br />

FOSSTON 1,521 531,772 516,562 571,827 +40,055<br />

FOUNTAIN 407 61,595 59,121 68,555 +6,960<br />

FOXHOME 117 24,020 22,947 26,225 +2,205<br />

FRANKLIN 503 132,445 127,415 152,057 +19,612<br />

FRAZEE 1,363 429,375 415,745 476,533 +47,158<br />

FREEBORN 301 58,270 57,791 69,220 +10,950<br />

FREEPORT 643 84,947 80,164 108,214 +23,267<br />

FRIDLEY 27,515 759,414 484,264 1,211,004 +451,590<br />

FROST 196 49,882 47,922 52,585 +2,703<br />

FULDA 1,308 402,389 389,309 446,007 +43,618<br />

FUNKLEY 5 141 139 141 +0<br />

GARFIELD 351 35,975 46,330 45,796 +9,821<br />

GARRISON 212 0 0 0 +0<br />

GARVIN 134 35,795 34,455 37,522 +1,727<br />

GARY 212 49,407 47,287 51,976 +2,569<br />

GAYLORD 2,313 768,161 745,031 838,309 +70,148<br />

GEM LAKE 393 0 0 0 +0<br />

GENEVA 552 64,937 62,013 93,001 +28,064<br />

GENOLA 74 547 536 547 +0<br />

GEORGETOWN 131 12,022 11,567 15,936 +3,914<br />

GHENT 367 78,035 74,980 91,294 +13,259<br />

GIBBON 773 216,241 208,511 252,828 +36,587<br />

GILBERT 1,795 685,125 667,175 706,174 +21,049<br />

GILMAN 227 9,574 11,833 17,177 +7,603<br />

GLENCOE 5,621 1,063,153 1,006,943 1,290,925 +227,772<br />

GLENVILLE 638 181,068 174,688 191,967 +10,899<br />

GLENWOOD 2,553 634,282 608,752 665,498 +31,216<br />

GLYNDON 1,410 272,438 286,877 346,889 +74,451<br />

GOLDEN VALLEY 20,427 0 0 219,070 +219,070<br />

GONVICK 285 60,511 57,661 69,371 +8,860<br />

GOOD THUNDER 580 146,720 140,920 163,762 +17,042<br />

GOODHUE 1,184 203,727 233,965 261,658 +57,931<br />

GOODRIDGE 134 22,707 21,367 27,950 +5,243<br />

GOODVIEW 4,057 138,108 141,057 250,835 +112,727<br />

GRACEVILLE 583 186,713 180,883 202,156 +15,443<br />

GRANADA 301 91,663 88,653 95,830 +4,167<br />

GRAND MARAIS 1,356 96,422 82,862 96,422 +0<br />

GRAND MEADOW 1,147 266,391 254,921 316,762 +50,371<br />

GRAND RAPIDS 10,879 963,410 905,765 1,270,377 +306,967<br />

GRANITE FALLS 2,879 717,911 689,121 904,460 +186,549<br />

GRANT 4,134 0 0 0 +0<br />

GRASSTON 158 15,678 17,028 20,552 +4,874<br />

GREEN ISLE 560 53,119 60,731 79,967 +26,848<br />

GREENBUSH 713 220,770 213,640 249,729 +28,959<br />

GREENFIELD 2,786 0 0 0 +0<br />

GREENWALD 222 27,389 26,762 33,043 +5,654<br />

GREENWOOD 688 0 0 0 +0<br />

GREY EAGLE 346 59,124 55,664 68,980 +9,856<br />

GROVE CITY 635 156,743 150,393 185,271 +28,528<br />

GRYGLA 222 42,945 40,725 48,633 +5,688<br />

Appendix B: 2014 LGA Estimates


<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Summaries</strong> Prepared by LMC with data from House Research<br />

Page 89<br />

2011 Population <strong>2013</strong> LGA<br />

2014 LGA<br />

–old law<br />

GULLY 63 17,335 16,733 17,335 +0<br />

HACKENSACK 314 0 0 0 +0<br />

HADLEY 62 15,455 15,058 15,455 +0<br />

HALLOCK 971 375,642 365,932 390,592 +14,950<br />

HALMA 58 10,985 10,500 12,433 +1,448<br />

HALSTAD 598 164,085 158,105 182,078 +17,993<br />

HAM LAKE 15,374 0 0 0 +0<br />

HAMBURG 514 58,777 56,324 72,948 +14,171<br />

HAMMOND 118 42,992 41,890 42,992 +0<br />

HAMPTON 689 88,374 87,399 107,524 +19,150<br />

HANCOCK 762 231,189 223,569 263,794 +32,605<br />

HANLEY FALLS 301 72,453 69,443 82,014 +9,561<br />

HANOVER 2,947 63,203 33,733 100,492 +37,289<br />

HANSKA 397 111,632 107,662 120,338 +8,706<br />

HARDING 126 2,049 3,249 6,408 +4,359<br />

HARDWICK 194 45,323 43,383 45,899 +576<br />

HARMONY 1,017 320,299 310,129 339,818 +19,519<br />

HARRIS 1,132 141,539 136,935 171,046 +29,507<br />

HARTLAND 315 48,121 48,000 59,162 +11,041<br />

HASTINGS 22,217 0 63,673 510,111 +510,111<br />

HATFIELD 54 3,830 3,691 3,830 +0<br />

HAWLEY 2,087 538,040 520,101 600,784 +62,744<br />

HAYFIELD 1,342 352,569 339,149 390,126 +37,557<br />

HAYWARD 249 28,981 26,971 34,773 +5,792<br />

HAZEL RUN 62 13,871 13,251 13,871 +0<br />

HECTOR 1,140 294,846 283,446 338,883 +44,037<br />

HEIDELBERG 122 0 0 833 +833<br />

HENDERSON 887 265,687 256,817 287,000 +21,313<br />

HENDRICKS 708 214,826 207,746 241,773 +26,947<br />

HENDRUM 306 57,667 54,607 66,943 +9,276<br />

HENNING 804 251,273 243,233 278,375 +27,102<br />

HENRIETTE 69 10,694 10,682 11,960 +1,266<br />

HERMAN 433 107,927 103,597 116,634 +8,707<br />

HERMANTOWN 9,545 331,873 236,423 355,570 +23,697<br />

HERON LAKE 691 287,970 281,060 295,049 +7,079<br />

HEWITT 265 59,776 57,134 65,974 +6,198<br />

HIBBING 16,313 7,994,316 7,831,186 8,082,401 +88,085<br />

HILL CITY 643 54,550 64,343 90,999 +36,449<br />

HILLMAN 38 2,746 2,599 4,115 +1,369<br />

HILLS 688 140,126 133,733 176,522 +36,396<br />

HILLTOP 781 116,309 111,693 138,621 +22,312<br />

HINCKLEY 1,805 267,164 316,933 329,583 +62,419<br />

HITTERDAL 207 38,852 36,782 43,029 +4,177<br />

HOFFMAN 684 139,624 132,784 176,342 +36,718<br />

HOKAH 576 154,315 148,555 167,109 +12,794<br />

HOLDINGFORD 710 165,544 158,444 195,215 +29,671<br />

HOLLAND 185 46,655 44,805 47,704 +1,049<br />

HOLLANDALE 303 38,035 43,239 50,316 +12,281<br />

HOLLOWAY 90 9,065 8,165 9,065 +0<br />

HOLT 88 15,629 15,060 17,890 +2,261<br />

HOPKINS 17,701 0 50,000 289,907 +289,907<br />

HOUSTON 988 331,011 321,131 353,617 +22,606<br />

HOWARD LAKE 1,978 476,814 457,576 543,979 +67,165<br />

HOYT LAKES 2,017 360,759 340,589 391,193 +30,434<br />

2014 LGA<br />

–Ch 143 Change 2011 Population <strong>2013</strong> LGA<br />

2014 LGA<br />

–old law<br />

2014 LGA<br />

–Ch 143<br />

Change<br />

HUGO 13,536 0 0 0 +0<br />

HUMBOLDT 45 12,042 11,592 12,302 +260<br />

HUTCHINSON 14,148 1,784,272 1,806,921 2,213,177 +428,905<br />

IHLEN 61 16,654 16,044 16,654 +0<br />

INDEPENDENCE 3,553 0 0 0 +0<br />

INTERNATIONAL FALLS 6,394 3,710,994 3,647,054 3,968,511 +257,517<br />

INVER GROVE HEIGHTS 33,774 0 0 0 +0<br />

IONA 136 37,043 35,683 37,234 +191<br />

IRON JUNCTION 85 12,230 11,847 12,315 +85<br />

IRONTON 574 114,741 109,001 137,845 +23,104<br />

ISANTI 5,286 313,359 416,394 545,474 +232,115<br />

ISLE 765 25,272 21,383 36,767 +11,495<br />

IVANHOE 551 203,179 197,669 213,187 +10,008<br />

JACKSON 3,294 1,086,755 1,053,815 1,290,625 +203,870<br />

JANESVILLE 2,268 724,872 702,192 775,072 +50,200<br />

JASPER 631 182,806 176,496 206,477 +23,671<br />

JEFFERS 368 112,493 108,813 116,128 +3,635<br />

JENKINS 434 0 0 5,387 +5,387<br />

JOHNSON 29 7,000 6,771 7,000 +0<br />

JORDAN 5,694 0 65,493 237,080 +237,080<br />

KANDIYOHI 485 97,952 93,907 114,796 +16,844<br />

KARLSTAD 756 232,848 225,288 260,381 +27,533<br />

KASOTA 670 143,296 138,273 168,055 +24,759<br />

KASSON 6,010 780,209 720,109 982,338 +202,129<br />

KEEWATIN 1,067 343,738 333,068 378,008 +34,270<br />

KELLIHER 264 107,307 104,667 107,307 +0<br />

KELLOGG 450 83,859 80,575 93,910 +10,051<br />

KENNEDY 193 66,764 64,834 66,764 +0<br />

KENNETH 68 10,330 9,650 10,536 +206<br />

KENSINGTON 288 54,270 51,519 60,470 +6,200<br />

KENT 80 20,567 19,767 21,171 +604<br />

KENYON 1,818 466,643 453,930 516,684 +50,041<br />

KERKHOVEN 752 185,283 177,763 217,166 +31,883<br />

KERRICK 64 3,489 3,207 5,352 +1,863<br />

KETTLE RIVER 180 22,510 20,710 27,092 +4,582<br />

KIESTER 499 151,029 146,039 165,486 +14,457<br />

KILKENNY 134 35,924 34,584 35,924 +0<br />

KIMBALL 769 117,942 112,551 146,838 +28,896<br />

KINBRAE 12 201 157 201 +0<br />

KINGSTON 161 12,833 12,442 17,977 +5,144<br />

KINNEY 169 59,925 58,235 59,925 +0<br />

LACRESCENT 4,883 422,847 374,017 531,684 +108,837<br />

LAFAYETTE 500 120,676 115,676 129,923 +9,247<br />

LAKE BENTON 677 198,628 191,858 223,629 +25,001<br />

LAKE BRONSON 225 71,423 69,173 74,541 +3,118<br />

LAKE CITY 5,053 610,347 559,817 748,389 +138,042<br />

LAKE CRYSTAL 2,540 621,727 596,327 705,898 +84,171<br />

LAKE ELMO 8,063 0 0 0 +0<br />

LAKE HENRY 105 6,578 7,813 10,510 +3,932<br />

LAKE LILLIAN 239 33,155 30,765 39,931 +6,776<br />

LAKE PARK 783 231,084 223,254 253,109 +22,025<br />

LAKE SHORE 1,005 0 0 0 +0<br />

LAKE ST CROIX BEACH 1,052 25,673 42,315 66,312 +40,639<br />

LAKE WILSON 248 76,722 74,242 78,109 +1,387<br />

Appendix B: 2014 LGA Estimates


Page 90 Prepared by LMC with data from House Research<br />

<strong>League</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>Cities</strong><br />

2011 Population <strong>2013</strong> LGA<br />

2014 LGA<br />

–old law<br />

LAKEFIELD 1,690 614,261 597,361 650,486 +36,225<br />

LAKELAND 1,796 33,574 29,407 47,157 +13,583<br />

LAKELAND SHORES 311 0 0 0 +0<br />

LAKEVILLE 56,534 0 0 0 +0<br />

LAMBERTON 826 287,784 279,524 304,385 +16,601<br />

LANCASTER 338 75,242 71,862 86,599 +11,357<br />

LANDFALL 767 79,977 81,863 96,184 +16,207<br />

LANESBORO 754 204,520 196,980 210,284 +5,764<br />

LAPORTE 108 10,915 10,438 10,915 +0<br />

LAPRAIRIE 662 66,553 63,611 79,908 +13,355<br />

LASALLE 87 16,635 15,966 17,821 +1,186<br />

LASTRUP 104 3,428 3,470 5,849 +2,421<br />

LAUDERDALE 2,398 516,153 499,914 535,092 +18,939<br />

LECENTER 2,506 719,916 694,856 785,602 +65,686<br />

LENGBY 84 21,916 21,076 21,916 +0<br />

LEONARD 41 4,390 4,715 5,661 +1,271<br />

LEONIDAS 52 34,670 34,150 34,670 +0<br />

LEROY 932 296,859 287,539 322,498 +25,639<br />

LESTER PRAIRIE 1,720 425,969 411,871 491,615 +65,646<br />

LESUEUR 4,045 767,922 727,472 910,371 +142,449<br />

LEWISTON 1,613 383,755 369,354 436,421 +52,666<br />

LEWISVILLE 250 67,068 64,568 71,850 +4,782<br />

LEXINGTON 2,078 335,280 322,136 385,298 +50,018<br />

LILYDALE 631 0 0 0 +0<br />

LINDSTROM 4,464 134,663 140,667 281,197 +146,534<br />

LINO LAKES 20,505 0 0 0 +0<br />

LISMORE 227 65,548 63,278 66,891 +1,343<br />

LITCHFIELD 6,721 1,588,853 1,521,643 1,832,138 +243,285<br />

LITTLE CANADA 9,839 195,843 97,453 344,818 +148,975<br />

LITTLE FALLS 8,331 2,089,080 2,005,770 2,435,226 +346,146<br />

LITTLEFORK 646 214,814 208,354 233,888 +19,074<br />

LONG BEACH 337 0 0 0 +0<br />

LONG LAKE 1,775 26,410 18,834 26,410 +0<br />

LONG PRAIRIE 3,445 735,532 701,082 914,704 +179,172<br />

LONGVILLE 154 0 0 0 +0<br />

LONSDALE 3,721 245,346 208,136 384,655 +139,309<br />

LORETTO 652 0 5,743 23,051 +23,051<br />

LOUISBURG 47 7,954 7,676 8,231 +277<br />

LOWRY 296 49,088 46,128 56,203 +7,115<br />

LUCAN 189 49,989 48,099 52,427 +2,438<br />

LUVERNE 4,745 1,194,175 1,146,725 1,349,783 +155,608<br />

LYLE 550 163,174 157,674 179,497 +16,323<br />

LYND 449 55,313 52,136 70,073 +14,760<br />

MABEL 781 223,127 215,317 255,952 +32,825<br />

MADELIA 2,307 860,375 837,305 916,863 +56,488<br />

MADISON 1,542 729,097 713,677 742,726 +13,629<br />

MADISON LAKE 1,033 119,406 112,808 152,986 +33,580<br />

MAGNOLIA 217 43,194 41,968 46,801 +3,607<br />

MAHNOMEN 1,215 446,371 434,221 631,385 +185,014<br />

MAHTOMEDI 7,645 0 0 0 +0<br />

MANCHESTER 54 14,717 14,287 14,717 +0<br />

MANHATTAN BEACH 57 0 0 0 +0<br />

MANKATO 39,628 6,228,727 5,928,727 6,818,135 +589,408<br />

MANTORVILLE 1,205 209,003 198,515 257,866 +48,863<br />

2014 LGA<br />

–Ch 143 Change 2011 Population <strong>2013</strong> LGA<br />

2014 LGA<br />

–old law<br />

2014 LGA<br />

–Ch 143<br />

Change<br />

MAPLE GROVE 62,436 0 0 0 +0<br />

MAPLE LAKE 2,081 431,190 425,648 479,338 +48,148<br />

MAPLE PLAIN 1,786 240,047 228,007 248,536 +8,489<br />

MAPLETON 1,761 486,318 484,727 548,857 +62,539<br />

MAPLEVIEW 177 50,167 48,397 51,679 +1,512<br />

MAPLEWOOD 38,374 0 0 530,683 +530,683<br />

MARBLE 700 221,504 214,504 241,626 +20,122<br />

MARIETTA 162 50,577 48,957 52,083 +1,506<br />

MARINE ON ST CROIX 688 0 0 0 +0<br />

MARSHALL 13,767 2,110,608 1,972,938 2,451,287 +340,679<br />

MAYER 1,756 266,365 264,551 290,420 +24,055<br />

MAYNARD 363 121,181 117,551 121,270 +89<br />

MAZEPPA 844 158,301 151,366 193,235 +34,934<br />

MCGRATH 79 7,837 9,062 11,189 +3,352<br />

MCGREGOR 390 89,434 85,534 90,174 +740<br />

MCINTOSH 621 199,366 193,156 220,246 +20,880<br />

MCKINLEY 128 51,142 49,862 51,142 +0<br />

MEADOWLANDS 133 21,477 20,625 23,936 +2,459<br />

MEDFORD 1,243 161,120 154,711 201,254 +40,134<br />

MEDICINE LAKE 371 0 0 0 +0<br />

MEDINA 4,916 0 0 0 +0<br />

MEIRE GROVE 180 12,123 14,457 19,881 +7,758<br />

MELROSE 3,622 614,850 578,630 766,363 +151,513<br />

MENAHGA 1,300 281,960 270,881 345,641 +63,681<br />

MENDOTA 204 25,000 24,694 25,000 +0<br />

MENDOTA HEIGHTS 11,098 0 0 0 +0<br />

MENTOR 153 32,824 31,923 35,008 +2,184<br />

MIDDLE RIVER 304 78,955 76,370 85,669 +6,714<br />

MIESVILLE 125 0 0 0 +0<br />

MILACA 2,944 602,629 573,189 755,664 +153,035<br />

MILAN 365 87,281 83,631 98,866 +11,585<br />

MILLERVILLE 105 7,791 7,729 9,595 +1,804<br />

MILLVILLE 184 18,803 17,950 23,292 +4,489<br />

MILROY 251 57,009 54,499 61,096 +4,087<br />

MILTONA 419 34,112 34,513 51,586 +17,474<br />

MINNEAPOLIS 387,873 64,142,268 63,842,268 76,065,485 +11,923,217<br />

MINNEISKA 109 5,781 5,292 5,781 +0<br />

MINNEOTA 1,392 412,603 398,683 459,016 +46,413<br />

MINNESOTA CITY 201 39,186 37,889 39,596 +410<br />

MINNESOTA LAKE 688 128,750 121,870 159,449 +30,699<br />

MINNETONKA 50,046 0 0 0 +0<br />

MINNETONKA BEACH 544 0 0 0 +0<br />

MINNETRISTA 6,450 0 0 0 +0<br />

MIZPAH 56 6,496 6,278 7,984 +1,488<br />

MONTEVIDEO 5,360 1,674,841 1,621,241 1,971,378 +296,537<br />

MONTGOMERY 2,952 628,916 599,396 728,565 +99,649<br />

MONTICELLO 12,840 0 0 0 +0<br />

MONTROSE 2,923 489,481 460,251 568,481 +79,000<br />

MOORHEAD 38,516 6,790,628 6,490,628 7,078,353 +287,725<br />

MOOSE LAKE 2,791 588,789 634,905 767,071 +178,282<br />

MORA 3,557 710,562 674,992 857,795 +147,233<br />

MORGAN 896 292,157 283,197 322,374 +30,217<br />

MORRIS 5,343 2,110,244 2,056,814 2,280,914 +170,670<br />

MORRISTOWN 986 230,442 221,601 276,352 +45,910<br />

Appendix B: 2014 LGA Estimates


<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Summaries</strong> Prepared by LMC with data from House Research<br />

Page 91<br />

2011 Population <strong>2013</strong> LGA<br />

2014 LGA<br />

–old law<br />

MORTON 406 131,431 127,371 137,148 +5,717<br />

MOTLEY 673 131,075 125,820 155,950 +24,875<br />

MOUND 9,084 0 0 301,146 +301,146<br />

MOUNDS VIEW 12,136 232,078 650,216 597,006 +364,928<br />

MOUNTAIN IRON 2,859 1,156,268 1,127,678 1,280,033 +123,765<br />

MOUNTAIN LAKE 2,111 807,450 786,340 863,255 +55,805<br />

MURDOCK 273 69,561 66,831 69,561 +0<br />

MYRTLE 47 11,424 10,962 11,424 +0<br />

NASHUA 68 0 0 0 +0<br />

NASHWAUK 982 403,480 393,660 403,480 +0<br />

NASSAU 72 17,638 17,070 17,638 +0<br />

NELSON 183 23,990 23,198 27,215 +3,225<br />

NERSTRAND 294 24,733 31,489 30,488 +5,755<br />

NEVIS 393 41,623 38,039 53,935 +12,312<br />

NEW AUBURN 451 106,481 102,869 121,770 +15,289<br />

NEW BRIGHTON 21,496 0 729,166 493,111 +493,111<br />

NEW GERMANY 374 11,743 10,792 15,815 +4,072<br />

NEW HOPE 20,486 41,843 158,844 532,795 +490,952<br />

NEW LONDON 1,260 274,860 262,991 308,291 +33,431<br />

NEW MUNICH 322 69,686 67,219 72,942 +3,256<br />

NEW PRAGUE 7,351 515,478 451,572 770,851 +255,373<br />

NEW RICHLAND 1,214 325,599 313,459 377,596 +51,997<br />

NEW TRIER 112 779 695 2,483 +1,704<br />

NEW ULM 13,467 4,111,762 3,977,092 4,222,706 +110,944<br />

NEW YORK MILLS 1,195 342,150 330,200 376,742 +34,592<br />

NEWFOLDEN 374 75,781 72,041 88,943 +13,162<br />

NEWPORT 3,449 588,876 554,386 631,462 +42,586<br />

NICOLLET 1,091 179,752 172,480 225,087 +45,335<br />

NIELSVILLE 89 21,942 21,052 23,544 +1,602<br />

NIMROD 71 2,542 2,457 4,936 +2,394<br />

NISSWA 1,979 0 0 0 +0<br />

NORCROSS 70 16,497 15,797 16,497 +0<br />

NORTH BRANCH 10,122 146,132 516,419 537,119 +390,987<br />

NORTH MANKATO 13,426 1,358,107 1,223,847 1,558,998 +200,891<br />

NORTH OAKS 4,539 0 0 0 +0<br />

NORTH ST PAUL 11,485 1,863,726 1,748,876 1,863,726 +0<br />

NORTHFIELD 20,454 2,243,397 2,143,003 2,802,295 +558,898<br />

NORTHOME 202 65,984 63,964 65,984 +0<br />

NORTHROP 223 45,444 43,809 51,981 +6,537<br />

NORWOOD YOUNG AMERICA 3,558 203,574 167,994 345,508 +141,934<br />

NOWTHEN 4,469 0 0 11,565 +11,565<br />

OAK GROVE 8,045 0 200,000 81,551 +81,551<br />

OAK PARK HEIGHTS 4,593 0 0 0 +0<br />

OAKDALE 27,538 0 0 106,030 +106,030<br />

ODESSA 136 37,973 36,613 39,155 +1,182<br />

ODIN 106 24,822 23,835 25,565 +743<br />

OGEMA 192 26,614 24,827 33,585 +6,971<br />

OGILVIE 362 123,218 119,598 123,218 +0<br />

OKABENA 189 49,544 47,654 52,256 +2,712<br />

OKLEE 441 107,276 102,866 122,694 +15,418<br />

OLIVIA 2,479 706,366 702,369 772,694 +66,328<br />

ONAMIA 875 239,116 230,650 260,942 +21,826<br />

ORMSBY 131 24,183 23,113 26,389 +2,206<br />

ORONO 7,438 0 0 0 +0<br />

2014 LGA<br />

–Ch 143 Change 2011 Population <strong>2013</strong> LGA<br />

2014 LGA<br />

–old law<br />

2014 LGA<br />

–Ch 143<br />

Change<br />

ORONOCO 1,303 28,182 39,412 66,651 +38,469<br />

ORR 268 41,927 39,247 47,502 +5,575<br />

ORTONVILLE 1,896 703,420 684,460 734,798 +31,378<br />

OSAKIS 1,742 380,867 363,447 434,105 +53,238<br />

OSLO 330 74,947 71,647 82,194 +7,247<br />

OSSEO 2,430 634,438 611,217 634,438 +0<br />

OSTRANDER 254 52,825 50,886 55,718 +2,893<br />

OTSEGO 13,816 0 278,035 112,705 +112,705<br />

OTTERTAIL 576 0 0 0 +0<br />

OWATONNA 25,572 3,153,124 3,143,795 3,935,875 +782,751<br />

PALISADE 163 14,295 13,561 18,675 +4,380<br />

PARK RAPIDS 3,708 314,126 316,584 459,585 +145,459<br />

PARKERS PRAIRIE 1,011 225,671 215,561 255,925 +30,254<br />

PAYNESVILLE 2,434 679,593 655,253 716,093 +36,500<br />

PEASE 241 19,424 23,427 28,856 +9,432<br />

PELICAN RAPIDS 2,476 908,614 883,854 953,189 +44,575<br />

PEMBERTON 248 25,203 24,295 33,030 +7,827<br />

PENNOCK 509 109,031 104,455 129,109 +20,078<br />

PEQUOT LAKES 2,176 59,996 93,220 72,385 +12,389<br />

PERHAM 2,995 459,137 429,187 583,097 +123,960<br />

PERLEY 92 22,100 21,212 22,100 +0<br />

PETERSON 197 45,675 43,995 45,675 +0<br />

PIERZ 1,401 362,938 351,943 409,776 +46,838<br />

PILLAGER 466 124,543 120,086 124,651 +108<br />

PINE CITY 3,119 426,553 395,363 550,707 +124,154<br />

PINE ISLAND 3,260 498,960 466,360 578,190 +79,230<br />

PINE RIVER 940 247,854 238,454 273,999 +26,145<br />

PINE SPRINGS 408 0 0 0 +0<br />

PIPESTONE 4,308 1,535,857 1,492,777 1,905,268 +369,411<br />

PLAINVIEW 3,348 544,648 511,168 696,828 +152,180<br />

PLATO 319 22,094 25,071 31,643 +9,549<br />

PLUMMER 296 49,211 46,251 56,166 +6,955<br />

PLYMOUTH 71,263 0 0 0 +0<br />

PORTER 180 35,295 33,495 35,295 +0<br />

PRESTON 1,322 484,980 471,760 493,986 +9,006<br />

PRINCETON 4,698 612,831 575,900 813,065 +200,234<br />

PRINSBURG 496 75,659 70,699 89,666 +14,007<br />

PRIOR LAKE 23,010 0 0 0 +0<br />

PROCTOR 3,058 955,226 924,646 1,019,424 +64,198<br />

QUAMBA 123 15,487 15,206 19,322 +3,835<br />

RACINE 454 61,097 59,604 72,805 +11,708<br />

RAMSEY 23,865 0 281,656 91,376 +91,376<br />

RANDALL 651 125,534 128,847 162,361 +36,827<br />

RANDOLPH 440 11,015 13,810 22,803 +11,788<br />

RANIER 609 21,685 20,439 45,478 +23,793<br />

RAYMOND 761 203,926 196,316 234,241 +30,315<br />

RED LAKE FALLS 1,429 546,204 531,914 582,707 +36,503<br />

RED WING 16,432 619,586 666,960 1,619,586 +1,000,000<br />

REDWOOD FALLS 5,248 1,075,270 1,256,032 1,398,367 +323,097<br />

REGAL 33 2,115 2,095 2,115 +0<br />

REMER 367 56,366 53,084 64,811 +8,445<br />

RENVILLE 1,272 408,605 395,885 444,169 +35,564<br />

REVERE 95 20,990 20,040 21,441 +451<br />

RICE 1,279 146,674 144,703 167,930 +21,256<br />

Appendix B: 2014 LGA Estimates


Page 92 Prepared by LMC with data from House Research<br />

<strong>League</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>Cities</strong><br />

2011 Population <strong>2013</strong> LGA<br />

2014 LGA<br />

–old law<br />

RICHFIELD 35,376 1,218,346 918,346 1,937,871 +719,525<br />

RICHMOND 1,430 237,322 236,620 289,004 +51,682<br />

RICHVILLE 95 14,049 13,742 15,480 +1,431<br />

RIVERTON 117 5,562 5,060 6,428 +866<br />

ROBBINSDALE 14,014 1,170,849 1,150,446 1,619,070 +448,221<br />

ROCHESTER 107,630 5,101,571 4,801,571 6,930,284 +1,828,713<br />

ROCK CREEK 1,624 133,506 153,806 208,584 +75,078<br />

ROCKFORD 4,321 309,689 284,990 453,283 +143,594<br />

ROCKVILLE 2,466 105,568 211,959 168,090 +62,522<br />

ROGERS 11,314 0 0 97,132 +97,132<br />

ROLLINGSTONE 657 135,555 131,078 155,259 +19,704<br />

ROOSEVELT 150 18,964 18,561 23,806 +4,842<br />

ROSCOE 103 21,702 20,918 21,702 +0<br />

ROSE CREEK 395 71,101 67,293 84,231 +13,130<br />

ROSEAU 2,622 569,076 542,856 649,522 +80,446<br />

ROSEMOUNT 22,139 0 0 0 +0<br />

ROSEVILLE 33,807 0 0 224,929 +224,929<br />

ROTHSAY 490 116,916 112,016 129,550 +12,634<br />

ROUND LAKE 374 119,605 115,865 121,131 +1,526<br />

ROYALTON 1,241 209,265 231,349 277,371 +68,106<br />

RUSH CITY 3,091 620,496 589,586 781,842 +161,346<br />

RUSHFORD 1,749 559,018 541,528 584,269 +25,251<br />

RUSHFORD VILLAGE 808 43,944 40,797 43,944 +0<br />

RUSHMORE 340 101,319 97,919 106,296 +4,977<br />

RUSSELL 336 81,277 77,917 87,987 +6,710<br />

RUTHTON 239 80,121 77,731 80,121 +0<br />

RUTLEDGE 227 3,257 3,225 10,565 +7,308<br />

SABIN 537 73,496 70,334 95,686 +22,190<br />

SACRED HEART 541 192,791 187,381 204,939 +12,148<br />

SAINT ANTHONY 8,333 0 0 473,110 +473,110<br />

SAINT BONIFACIUS 2,287 294,333 287,150 339,934 +45,601<br />

SAINT LOUIS PARK 45,505 0 0 458,807 +458,807<br />

SANBORN 337 121,650 118,280 121,650 +0<br />

SANDSTONE 2,848 869,374 840,894 1,038,025 +168,651<br />

SARGEANT 61 12,070 11,774 12,070 +0<br />

SARTELL 15,963 3,554 85,723 110,662 +107,108<br />

SAUK CENTRE 4,325 966,004 922,754 1,099,844 +133,840<br />

SAUK RAPIDS 12,796 1,579,706 1,585,934 1,912,481 +332,775<br />

SAVAGE 27,147 0 0 0 +0<br />

SCANDIA 3,967 0 0 0 +0<br />

SCANLON 991 175,093 165,183 203,426 +28,333<br />

SEAFORTH 86 16,402 15,542 17,391 +989<br />

SEBEKA 708 169,550 162,470 209,429 +39,879<br />

SEDAN 43 7,025 6,807 7,025 +0<br />

SHAFER 1,047 150,254 167,781 209,979 +59,725<br />

SHAKOPEE 37,652 0 0 0 +0<br />

SHELLY 190 65,258 63,358 65,258 +0<br />

SHERBURN 1,131 291,361 288,633 346,993 +55,632<br />

SHEVLIN 178 24,244 24,461 30,318 +6,074<br />

SHOREVIEW 25,118 0 0 0 +0<br />

SHOREWOOD 7,312 0 0 0 +0<br />

SILVER BAY 1,869 450,020 431,330 498,608 +48,588<br />

SILVER LAKE 835 168,619 160,269 208,207 +39,588<br />

SKYLINE 285 4,344 4,155 10,982 +6,638<br />

2014 LGA<br />

–Ch 143 Change 2011 Population <strong>2013</strong> LGA<br />

2014 LGA<br />

–old law<br />

2014 LGA<br />

–Ch 143<br />

Change<br />

SLAYTON 2,147 762,656 741,186 799,335 +36,679<br />

SLEEPY EYE 3,598 1,274,191 1,238,211 1,411,867 +137,676<br />

SOBIESKI 197 11,997 11,838 18,511 +6,514<br />

SOLWAY 98 4,975 6,375 9,073 +4,098<br />

SOUTH HAVEN 189 32,626 30,908 34,495 +1,869<br />

SOUTH ST PAUL 20,275 1,663,720 1,599,824 2,290,358 +626,638<br />

SPICER 1,164 45,440 38,454 57,262 +11,822<br />

SPRING GROVE 1,324 367,822 354,582 411,369 +43,547<br />

SPRING HILL 85 2,131 3,446 5,191 +3,060<br />

SPRING LAKE PARK 6,432 0 258,896 291,257 +291,257<br />

SPRING PARK 1,686 0 0 0 +0<br />

SPRING VALLEY 2,474 797,702 774,585 860,778 +63,076<br />

SPRINGFIELD 2,144 875,030 853,590 911,482 +36,452<br />

SQUAW LAKE 109 9,160 8,688 10,726 +1,566<br />

ST ANTHONY 86 7,166 6,919 9,655 +2,489<br />

ST AUGUSTA 3,358 10,963 0 55,216 +44,253<br />

ST CHARLES 3,737 757,339 719,969 860,980 +103,641<br />

ST CLAIR 871 182,675 176,124 231,868 +49,193<br />

ST CLOUD 65,633 10,081,386 9,781,386 11,728,245 +1,646,859<br />

ST FRANCIS 7,255 80,929 352,507 313,455 +232,526<br />

ST HILAIRE 283 68,008 65,766 69,996 +1,988<br />

ST JAMES 4,597 1,336,057 1,290,087 1,565,697 +229,640<br />

ST JOSEPH 6,579 645,151 579,361 873,161 +228,010<br />

ST LEO 99 16,916 16,272 19,623 +2,707<br />

ST MARTIN 307 42,909 41,820 46,121 +3,212<br />

ST MARY’S POINT 370 0 0 0 +0<br />

ST MICHAEL 16,536 0 415,766 239,129 +239,129<br />

ST PAUL 286,367 50,320,488 50,020,488 60,423,748 +10,103,260<br />

ST PAUL PARK 5,304 143,307 205,883 459,542 +316,235<br />

ST PETER 11,459 2,616,126 2,501,536 2,908,494 +292,368<br />

ST ROSA 68 0 0 0 +0<br />

ST STEPHEN 853 105,818 101,999 146,645 +40,827<br />

ST VINCENT 61 21,076 20,466 21,076 +0<br />

STACY 1,456 235,912 228,975 281,738 +45,826<br />

STAPLES 2,976 957,573 927,813 1,120,083 +162,510<br />

STARBUCK 1,297 316,109 303,139 350,548 +34,439<br />

STEEN 179 33,495 32,594 37,680 +4,185<br />

STEPHEN 658 193,225 186,645 219,586 +26,361<br />

STEWART 567 131,959 126,289 153,700 +21,741<br />

STEWARTVILLE 5,972 599,307 541,555 852,606 +253,299<br />

STILLWATER 18,299 174,580 290,641 568,571 +393,991<br />

STOCKTON 690 154,893 151,729 175,912 +21,019<br />

STORDEN 216 68,812 66,652 68,812 +0<br />

STRANDQUIST 69 17,869 17,179 18,785 +916<br />

STRATHCONA 44 3,915 4,215 5,896 +1,981<br />

STURGEON LAKE 437 28,838 36,654 47,793 +18,955<br />

SUNBURG 100 25,134 24,134 25,365 +231<br />

SUNFISH LAKE 521 0 0 0 +0<br />

SWANVILLE 349 85,817 82,327 90,257 +4,440<br />

TACONITE 359 92,714 89,124 92,714 +0<br />

TAMARACK 98 15,076 14,828 16,030 +954<br />

TAOPI 58 9,097 8,866 9,682 +585<br />

TAUNTON 136 43,070 42,076 43,070 +0<br />

TAYLORS FALLS 974 156,385 149,408 170,970 +14,585<br />

Appendix B: 2014 LGA Estimates


<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Summaries</strong> Prepared by LMC with data from House Research<br />

Page 93<br />

2011 Population <strong>2013</strong> LGA<br />

2014 LGA<br />

–old law<br />

TENSTRIKE 205 2,960 2,893 6,041 +3,081<br />

THIEF RIVER FALLS 8,587 2,418,906 2,333,036 2,896,081 +477,175<br />

THOMSON 157 9,022 8,204 9,022 +0<br />

TINTAH 63 11,846 11,264 12,469 +623<br />

TONKA BAY 1,477 0 0 0 +0<br />

TOWER 497 80,156 75,186 87,685 +7,529<br />

TRACY 2,178 859,170 837,390 908,237 +49,067<br />

TRAIL 46 2,350 2,169 2,350 +0<br />

TRIMONT 742 218,148 210,728 247,829 +29,681<br />

TROMMALD 98 6,968 6,425 6,968 +0<br />

TROSKY 85 18,940 18,563 18,940 +0<br />

TRUMAN 1,107 392,748 381,678 415,713 +22,965<br />

TURTLE RIVER 80 0 0 0 +0<br />

TWIN LAKES 152 26,141 24,621 29,319 +3,178<br />

TWIN VALLEY 823 269,231 261,001 299,306 +30,075<br />

TWO HARBORS 3,728 1,107,828 1,070,548 1,457,801 +349,973<br />

TYLER 1,130 387,654 376,354 421,568 +33,914<br />

ULEN 553 138,006 132,476 144,691 +6,685<br />

UNDERWOOD 339 70,902 67,512 75,203 +4,301<br />

UPSALA 428 64,069 60,434 77,515 +13,446<br />

URBANK 54 6,744 6,514 7,298 +554<br />

UTICA 290 30,803 29,888 37,985 +7,182<br />

VADNAIS HEIGHTS 12,393 0 266,028 24,635 +24,635<br />

VERGAS 332 30,206 28,986 33,071 +2,865<br />

VERMILLION 420 5,649 5,346 15,185 +9,536<br />

VERNDALE 601 130,357 124,575 161,102 +30,745<br />

VERNON CENTER 331 66,020 63,351 67,233 +1,213<br />

VESTA 319 82,326 79,136 89,280 +6,954<br />

VICTORIA 7,554 0 0 0 +0<br />

VIKING 108 18,592 17,512 21,717 +3,125<br />

VILLARD 250 36,658 34,476 41,425 +4,767<br />

VINING 78 9,042 8,442 9,987 +945<br />

VIRGINIA 8,685 4,062,905 3,976,055 4,930,304 +867,399<br />

WABASHA 2,516 584,751 559,591 594,369 +9,618<br />

WABASSO 693 183,887 176,957 210,318 +26,431<br />

WACONIA 10,833 0 0 76,518 +76,518<br />

WADENA 4,014 1,191,075 1,150,935 1,486,209 +295,134<br />

WAHKON 207 0 0 0 +0<br />

WAITE PARK 6,714 0 0 0 +0<br />

WALDORF 230 41,621 39,321 46,872 +5,251<br />

WALKER 925 79,001 69,751 79,001 +0<br />

WALNUT GROVE 871 225,413 236,404 264,715 +39,302<br />

WALTERS 72 18,983 18,263 20,063 +1,080<br />

WALTHAM 151 33,076 31,566 33,295 +219<br />

WANAMINGO 1,084 182,565 183,147 227,211 +44,646<br />

WANDA 83 22,194 21,433 22,781 +587<br />

WARBA 178 12,403 11,849 13,524 +1,121<br />

WARREN 1,563 561,156 545,526 603,251 +42,095<br />

WARROAD 1,768 732,836 715,156 882,836 +150,000<br />

WASECA 9,368 2,273,651 2,179,971 2,617,884 +344,233<br />

WATERTOWN 4,215 173,368 131,218 299,613 +126,245<br />

WATERVILLE 1,869 438,284 419,594 472,253 +33,969<br />

WATKINS 957 251,433 243,184 285,955 +34,522<br />

WATSON 203 59,458 57,428 62,711 +3,253<br />

2014 LGA<br />

–Ch 143 Change 2011 Population <strong>2013</strong> LGA<br />

2014 LGA<br />

–old law<br />

2014 LGA<br />

–Ch 143<br />

Change<br />

WAUBUN 403 93,242 90,187 107,486 +14,244<br />

WAVERLY 1,371 82,979 144,470 143,685 +60,706<br />

WAYZATA 3,720 0 0 0 +0<br />

WELCOME 683 216,934 210,104 217,709 +775<br />

WELLS 2,338 893,883 870,503 927,216 +33,333<br />

WENDELL 166 34,022 32,362 35,761 +1,739<br />

WEST CONCORD 785 261,011 253,161 283,647 +22,636<br />

WEST ST PAUL 19,605 773,763 577,713 1,153,324 +379,561<br />

WEST UNION 110 6,713 7,713 11,833 +5,120<br />

WESTBROOK 739 230,048 222,658 259,730 +29,682<br />

WESTPORT 56 5,951 5,857 7,368 +1,417<br />

WHALAN 63 8,001 7,371 8,001 +0<br />

WHEATON 1,425 562,909 548,659 581,818 +18,909<br />

WHITE BEAR LAKE 23,820 1,532,448 1,294,248 1,532,448 +0<br />

WILDER 60 16,106 15,506 16,106 +0<br />

WILLERNIE 508 75,922 73,860 78,239 +2,317<br />

WILLIAMS 190 41,672 39,772 43,738 +2,066<br />

WILLMAR 19,600 4,052,790 3,856,790 4,439,703 +386,913<br />

WILLOW RIVER 414 45,572 43,725 58,702 +13,130<br />

WILMONT 337 86,327 82,957 92,678 +6,351<br />

WILTON 218 7,670 7,646 14,127 +6,457<br />

WINDOM 4,649 1,202,917 1,156,427 1,419,013 +216,096<br />

WINGER 220 33,075 31,530 40,385 +7,310<br />

WINNEBAGO 1,435 503,310 488,960 524,076 +20,766<br />

WINONA 27,603 9,162,003 8,885,973 9,699,955 +537,952<br />

WINSTED 2,348 547,848 559,915 628,517 +80,669<br />

WINTHROP 1,400 393,587 379,587 413,497 +19,910<br />

WINTON 170 24,869 29,743 27,875 +3,006<br />

WOLF LAKE 59 8,042 8,006 9,654 +1,612<br />

WOLVERTON 142 24,318 22,898 27,029 +2,711<br />

WOOD LAKE 434 108,208 103,868 119,766 +11,558<br />

WOODBURY 63,143 0 0 0 +0<br />

WOODLAND 437 0 0 0 +0<br />

WOODSTOCK 125 32,442 31,192 32,906 +464<br />

WORTHINGTON 12,829 2,705,107 2,576,817 3,109,564 +404,457<br />

WRENSHALL 403 42,399 39,200 49,695 +7,296<br />

WRIGHT 130 7,938 7,494 11,153 +3,215<br />

WYKOFF 444 118,215 113,775 126,862 +8,647<br />

WYOMING 7,796 0 0 170,783 +170,783<br />

ZEMPLE 93 742 682 3,552 +2,810<br />

ZIMMERMAN 5,235 235,842 360,516 445,571 +209,729<br />

ZUMBRO FALLS 180 34,610 33,077 35,688 +1,078<br />

ZUMBROTA 3,267 426,975 394,305 552,668 +125,693<br />

TOTALS 4,371,612 427,494,640 426,438,011 507,598,012 +80,103,372<br />

Appendix B: 2014 LGA Estimates


<strong>League</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>Cities</strong> Intergovernmental Relations Department<br />

The <strong>League</strong>’s Intergovernmental Relations (IGR) staff work on legislative issues that matter to cities. Feel free to<br />

contact our IGR staff members with any questions, concerns, or suggestions regarding legislative issues.<br />

IGR staff members and legislative issues:<br />

Gary Carlson<br />

Intergovernmental Relations Director<br />

(651) 281-1255<br />

gcarlson@lmc.org<br />

www.twitter.com/garyncarlson<br />

Legislative issues:<br />

• Aid to cities<br />

• Civil liability<br />

• Pensions and retirement<br />

• Property tax system<br />

• Public finance<br />

Heather Cederholm<br />

Intergovernmental Relations Liaison<br />

(651) 281-1256<br />

hcederholm@lmc.org<br />

www.twitter.com/hrceder<br />

Legislative issues:<br />

• Housing<br />

• Grassroots member advocacy<br />

• Legislative appointments<br />

• Legislative listservs<br />

• Libraries<br />

• Policy committees<br />

• Policy development process<br />

• Sustainable development<br />

• Tax increment financing (TIF)<br />

Anne Finn<br />

Assistant Intergovernmental Relations Director<br />

(651) 281-1263<br />

afinn@lmc.org<br />

www.twitter.com/annemfinn<br />

Legislative issues:<br />

• Emergency management<br />

• Insurance<br />

• Pensions and retirement<br />

• Personnel<br />

• Public safety<br />

• State bonding<br />

• Transportation<br />

Patrick Hynes<br />

Intergovernmental Relations Representative<br />

(651) 281-1260<br />

phynes@lmc.org<br />

www.twitter.com/PJHynes2<br />

Legislative issues:<br />

• Building codes<br />

• Civil liability<br />

• Data practices<br />

• Economic development<br />

• Land use, zoning, and annexation<br />

• Pensions and retirement<br />

• Property tax system<br />

• Public finance<br />

• Tax-increment financing (TIF)<br />

Craig Johnson<br />

Intergovernmental Relations Representative<br />

(651) 281-1259<br />

cjohnson@lmc.org<br />

www.twitter.com/cajohnson_1<br />

Legislative issues:<br />

• Energy<br />

• Environment<br />

• Land use and annexation<br />

• Local/tribal relations<br />

• State bonding<br />

• Sustainable development<br />

• Utilities billing<br />

• Wastewater, drinking water, and<br />

stormwater<br />

Ann Lindstrom<br />

Intergovernmental Relations Representative<br />

(651) 281-1261<br />

alindstrom@lmc.org<br />

www.twitter.com/AnnRL<br />

Legislative issues:<br />

• Economic development and redevelopment<br />

• Elections<br />

• Government redesign<br />

• Public safety<br />

• Regulated services and industries<br />

Laura Ziegler<br />

Intergovernmental Relations Liaison<br />

(651) 281-1267<br />

lziegler@lmc.org<br />

www.twitter.com/laurahziegler<br />

Legislative issues:<br />

• Broadband<br />

• Elections<br />

• Grassroots member advocacy<br />

• Legislative appointments<br />

• Legislative listservs<br />

• Policy committees<br />

• Policy development process<br />

• Transportation<br />

• Underground locating<br />

<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Summaries</strong> Page 95


<strong>League</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>Cities</strong><br />

145 University Avenue West<br />

St. Paul, MN 55103-2044<br />

TEL: (651) 281-1200<br />

(800) 925-1122<br />

TDD: (651) 281-1290<br />

FAX: (651) 281-1299<br />

WEB: www.lmc.org

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!