29.08.2015 Views

Pre Bid response for supply of Laptops for ... - DOITC Rajasthan

Pre Bid response for supply of Laptops for ... - DOITC Rajasthan

Pre Bid response for supply of Laptops for ... - DOITC Rajasthan

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Selection <strong>of</strong> Vendor <strong>for</strong> <strong>supply</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Laptops</strong> throughout the State <strong>of</strong> <strong>Rajasthan</strong><br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

1 12 3) i Space <strong>for</strong> Help Desk We are expecting that Space provided will at free <strong>of</strong> cost, Please confirm. RISl shall provide necessary working<br />

space, furniture, electricity, internet<br />

connectivity at Free <strong>of</strong> Cost to<br />

facilitate the bidder in setting-up the<br />

Helpdesk<br />

As per amended RFP<br />

2 12 We are expecting that Electricity charges, Internet charges will be borne by<br />

RISL, Please confirm.<br />

3 12 We assume that the security <strong>for</strong> the Help Desk Setup will be provided by RISL,<br />

Please confirm.<br />

4 12 We are expecting that Other than Bench, RISL would also Provide the<br />

Working Bench, Chairs, AC, Furnishings etc. Please confirm.<br />

Yes<br />

Yes<br />

RISL will provide the working<br />

environment<br />

5 12 3) ii INR 10000 Per Seat Please clarify the basis <strong>of</strong> this calculation. To maintain 02 seats <strong>for</strong> 10 hrs. a<br />

day & 6 days a week, we require minimum 04 Persons considering the<br />

recommended Working hours/ week <strong>for</strong> an employee and Leave<br />

entitlements.<br />

As per amended RFP<br />

6 13 4) A Phase-Delivery Schedule<br />

1, B Phase-<br />

2<br />

Whether the delivery <strong>of</strong> lots is planned district wise? If It is so, please share<br />

the details and schedule.<br />

Yes. Schedule is provided in the<br />

section "Delivery Schedule". Other<br />

relevant details shall be provided to<br />

the selected bidder.


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

7 41 35.<br />

Payment<br />

Terms and<br />

Schedule<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

2-Quarterly Helpdesk Reports<br />

(except <strong>for</strong> the last quarter) and 3-<br />

Final Quarter Helpdesk<br />

We have understood from this clause that<br />

First, 0.6% <strong>of</strong> our order value (<strong>for</strong> any single lot) shall be paid in advance<br />

be<strong>for</strong>e the start <strong>of</strong> first quarter.<br />

Second, 0.6% <strong>of</strong> our order value (<strong>for</strong> any single lot) shall be paid in advance<br />

be<strong>for</strong>e the start <strong>of</strong> second quarter.<br />

Third, 0.6% <strong>of</strong> our order value (<strong>for</strong> any single lot) shall be paid in advance<br />

be<strong>for</strong>e the start <strong>of</strong> third quarter.<br />

Fourth, 0.6% <strong>of</strong> our order value (<strong>for</strong> any single lot) shall be paid in advance<br />

be<strong>for</strong>e the start <strong>of</strong> fourth quarter.<br />

Remaining payment equivalent to 2.6% <strong>of</strong> the order value (<strong>for</strong> any single lot)<br />

shall be released after the completion <strong>of</strong> fourth quarter.<br />

We also understand that we shall be paid INR 20K <strong>for</strong> two persons required<br />

<strong>for</strong> helpdesk along with quarterly payment.<br />

Kindly confirm / advise.<br />

No advance payment shall be made.<br />

Read carefully point 35 (h) <strong>of</strong><br />

Payment Terms and Schedule.<br />

0.6% <strong>of</strong> the order value, subject to<br />

the sum <strong>of</strong> this amount already paid<br />

not exceeding 5% <strong>of</strong> the Order Value<br />

+ actual cost <strong>of</strong> helpdesk <strong>for</strong> the<br />

quarter shall be paid after each<br />

quarter<br />

Remaining payment <strong>of</strong> the order<br />

value (not exceeding 5% <strong>of</strong> the order<br />

value) and actual cost <strong>of</strong> the helpdesk<br />

<strong>for</strong> the final quarter shall be made<br />

after completion <strong>of</strong> final quarter<br />

8 58 Annexure<br />

10<br />

Price bid<br />

HCL requests RajCOMP to kindly elaborate on how the cost <strong>for</strong> helpdesk will<br />

be taken into consideration or accounted <strong>for</strong>, as there is no separate section<br />

to mention the helpdesk prices but as per payment terms mentioned on page<br />

35 & 36 <strong>of</strong> the RFP, helpdesk payment to be released separately.<br />

As per amended RFP Please read<br />

Section 2. A. (ii) carefully<br />

9 New Proposed Clause <strong>for</strong> Tax<br />

Change<br />

The basic rates shall REMAIN FIRM during the tenure <strong>of</strong> the contract / As per RFP<br />

extended period <strong>of</strong> contract and NO ESCALATIONS, whatsoever shall either be<br />

claimed or considered. However In case any national or state statute or any<br />

local law or regulation or by-law <strong>of</strong> any duly constituted authority is changed<br />

or comes into <strong>for</strong>ce which results in extra costs/tax in relation to the<br />

provision <strong>of</strong> the goods/ Services, the consequential effect shall be to the<br />

account <strong>of</strong> the Purchaser and the same shall be borne by the Purchaser


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

10 New Proposed Clause <strong>for</strong> Deemed<br />

Acceptance<br />

The basic rates shall REMAIN FIRM during the tenure <strong>of</strong> the contract / As per RFP<br />

extended period <strong>of</strong> contract and NO ESCALATIONS, whatsoever shall either be<br />

claimed or considered. However In case any national or state statute or any<br />

local law or regulation or by-law <strong>of</strong> any duly constituted authority is changed<br />

or comes into <strong>for</strong>ce which results in extra costs/tax in relation to the<br />

provision <strong>of</strong> the goods/ Services, the consequential effect shall be to the<br />

account <strong>of</strong> the Purchaser and the same shall be borne by the Purchaser<br />

11 22 24 Negotiations Sir, we understand the importance and urgency on this project and to<br />

increase the probability <strong>of</strong> successful implementation, may we propose to<br />

allow the interested bidders to quote <strong>for</strong> one or two lots so that chances <strong>of</strong><br />

timely implementation <strong>of</strong> this scheme can be ensured.<br />

As per amended RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

12 38 29 29) Limitation <strong>of</strong> Liability:<br />

b) the aggregate liability <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Supplier to the Purchaser, whether<br />

under the Contract, in tort, or<br />

otherwise, shall not exceed the<br />

amount specified in the Contract,<br />

provided that this limitation shall<br />

not apply to the cost <strong>of</strong> repairing or<br />

replacing defective equipment, or<br />

to any obligation <strong>of</strong> the Supplier to<br />

indemnify the Purchaser with<br />

respect to patent infringement.<br />

We request the clause to be amended. Amended clause is as follows:<br />

29) Limitation <strong>of</strong> Liability:<br />

b) the aggregate liability <strong>of</strong> the Supplier to the Purchaser, whether under the<br />

Contract, in tort, or otherwise, shall be limited to the amount actually paid by<br />

the Purchaser to the <strong>Bid</strong>der in respect <strong>of</strong> the Hardware/ Network Equipment/<br />

Services that are subject matter <strong>of</strong> a claim subject to a maximum <strong>of</strong> 10% <strong>of</strong><br />

the contract value , provided that this limitation shall not apply to the cost <strong>of</strong><br />

repairing or replacing defective equipment, or to any obligation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Supplier to indemnify the Purchaser with respect to patent infringement.<br />

As per RFP<br />

13 40 33 c) Termination <strong>for</strong> Convenience:<br />

i. RISL, by a written Notice <strong>of</strong> at<br />

least 30 days sent to the Supplier,<br />

may terminate the Contract, in<br />

whole or in part, at any time <strong>for</strong> its<br />

convenience.<br />

We request the clause to be amended. Amended clause is as follows:<br />

c) Termination <strong>for</strong> Convenience:<br />

i. RISL, by Ninety days (90) written notice sent to the Supplier, may terminate<br />

the Contract, in whole or in part, at any time <strong>for</strong> its convenience.<br />

As per RFP<br />

14 40 33 iii. The Goods that are complete<br />

and ready <strong>for</strong> shipment within<br />

twenty-eight (28) days after the<br />

Supplier's receipt <strong>of</strong> the Notice <strong>of</strong><br />

termination shall be accepted by<br />

the Purchaser at the Contract terms<br />

and prices. For the remaining<br />

Goods, the Purchaser may elect:<br />

We request the clause to be amended. Amended clause is as follows:<br />

iii. The Goods that are complete and ready <strong>for</strong> shipment within sixty (60) days<br />

after the Supplier's receipt <strong>of</strong> the Notice <strong>of</strong> termination shall be accepted by<br />

the Purchaser at the Contract terms and prices. For the remaining Goods, the<br />

Purchaser may elect:<br />

As per RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

15 40 34) b Standing Committee <strong>for</strong> Settlement<br />

<strong>of</strong> Disputes<br />

We recommend the clause to be deleted as we prefer arbitration proceedings<br />

to be conducted as per Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Proposed<br />

clause is as follows:<br />

RISL and the selected <strong>Bid</strong>der shall make every ef<strong>for</strong>t to resolve amicably by<br />

direct negotiations any disagreement or dispute between them on any matter<br />

connected with the contract or in regard to the interpretation <strong>of</strong> the context<br />

there<strong>of</strong>. If, after seven (7) days from the commencement <strong>of</strong> negotiations,<br />

RISL and the selected <strong>Bid</strong>der have not been able to resolve amicably a<br />

contract dispute, such differences and disputes shall be referred, at the<br />

option <strong>of</strong> either party, to the arbitration <strong>of</strong> one single arbitrator to be<br />

mutually agreed upon and in the event <strong>of</strong> no consensus, the arbitration shall<br />

be done by three arbitrators, one to be nominated by RISL, one to be<br />

nominated by the selected <strong>Bid</strong>der and the third arbitrator shall be nominated<br />

by the two arbitrators nominated as above. The arbitration proceedings shall<br />

be in accordance with the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996.<br />

As per RFP<br />

16 36 26 d) Liquidated damages:<br />

b) Liquidated damages:<br />

Delay up to one fourth period <strong>of</strong> the Delay up to one fourth period <strong>of</strong> the prescribed delivery period, successful<br />

prescribed delivery period, installation & completion <strong>of</strong> work: 2.5 % <strong>of</strong> the value <strong>of</strong> undelivered Goods/<br />

successful installation & completion uninstalled work/ delayed services.<br />

<strong>of</strong> work: 2.5 %<br />

Delay exceeding one fourth but not<br />

exceeding half <strong>of</strong> the prescribed<br />

delivery period, successful<br />

installation & completion <strong>of</strong> work:<br />

5.0 %<br />

Delay exceeding half but not<br />

exceeding three fourth <strong>of</strong> the<br />

prescribed delivery period,<br />

Delay exceeding one fourth but not exceeding half <strong>of</strong> the prescribed delivery<br />

period, successful installation & completion <strong>of</strong> work: 5.0 % <strong>of</strong> the value <strong>of</strong><br />

undelivered Goods/ uninstalled work/ delayed services.<br />

Delay exceeding half but not exceeding three fourth <strong>of</strong> the prescribed<br />

delivery period, successful installation & completion <strong>of</strong> work: 7.5 % <strong>of</strong> the<br />

value <strong>of</strong> undelivered Goods/ uninstalled work/ delayed services.<br />

Delay exceeding three fourth <strong>of</strong> the prescribed delivery period, successful<br />

installation & completion <strong>of</strong> work: 10.0 % <strong>of</strong> the value <strong>of</strong> undelivered Goods/<br />

uninstalled work/ delayed services.<br />

successful installation & completion Kindly amend the LD item wise <strong>for</strong> the items only not delivered in time.<br />

<strong>of</strong> work: 7.5 %<br />

Delay exceeding three fourth <strong>of</strong> the<br />

prescribed delivery period,<br />

successful installation & completion<br />

<strong>of</strong> work: 10.0 %<br />

As per amended RFP<br />

17 18 10. e . V To adjust any dues against the firm<br />

from any other contract with RISL<br />

Kindly amend it to the "same contract only" and not from any other project<br />

as it goes against Contract Law <strong>of</strong> Government <strong>of</strong> India.<br />

As per RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

18 17 9 Validity <strong>of</strong> <strong>Bid</strong>: 120 days Kindly amend the validity <strong>of</strong> <strong>Bid</strong>s to at least 60/90 days. As per RFP<br />

19 41 35 Payment Terms & Schedule As vendor will give PSD <strong>of</strong> 5% amount <strong>for</strong> the period <strong>of</strong> warranty, We request<br />

you to make the payment terms as 100% on Supply & installation in place <strong>of</strong><br />

95%.<br />

As per RFP<br />

20 Nil Nil New Proposed Clause: ERV Clause<br />

(Exchange Rate variation)<br />

We request you to please add Exchange Rate variation Clause or please make<br />

it a international bid where we can quote in Dollar & payment will also be<br />

made in dollar. These is very essential <strong>for</strong> meeting the challenges <strong>of</strong><br />

fluctuating dollar in the current market scenario.<br />

As per RFP<br />

21 48 Annexure<br />

: 2 A<br />

New Proposed Clause: Item No.-A<br />

Laptop : Green Peace rating 3.0 or<br />

Higher<br />

Request you to please add the Green Peace rating certificate <strong>of</strong> 3.0 or higher<br />

in the tender so as to create a healthy competition among the vendors.<br />

As per RFP<br />

22 48 Annexure<br />

: 2 A<br />

Optical Drive : DVD R/W (16X<br />

higher)<br />

This is a non standard item <strong>for</strong> Laptop as generally 8x DVD Writer comes with<br />

Laptop. Kindly amend the same.<br />

As per amended RFP<br />

23 43 37 Exit Management Vendor should not bear any cost or penalty or charge w.r.t Exit management.<br />

Buyer should bear all cost and charges. Also as per the clause number 37 B<br />

(iii) B page number 43, assets will get transferred after 3 years, which means<br />

the revenue will not get recognized <strong>for</strong> bidder <strong>for</strong> 3 years. Request you to<br />

kindly delete this clause. This is very important clause <strong>for</strong> deletion. Request<br />

you to kindly delete.<br />

As per amended RFP<br />

24 43 37 -(b) - iii Title and Risk Transfer Vendor assumes that the title <strong>of</strong> ownership <strong>of</strong> the goods supplied under this<br />

contract is passed on the customer on delivering the material to the<br />

customer. Request your confirmation on this. Without this, revenue will not<br />

get recognized<br />

25 47 Annexure-<br />

1<br />

Period <strong>of</strong> end <strong>of</strong> sale (in months) &<br />

Period <strong>of</strong> end <strong>of</strong> service & Period <strong>of</strong><br />

back to back support, updates and<br />

patches (in months)<br />

We appreciate this clause and would request you to specifically ask <strong>for</strong><br />

Manufacturer Authorization Form (MAF) from the supplier <strong>of</strong> critical<br />

components such as CPU, Mother board, Operating System, Office and<br />

antivirus application. This MAF would be submitted by all OEM.<br />

26 18 EMD Form <strong>of</strong> EMD Please provide the bid bond (BG) <strong>for</strong>mat as bid document only has PBG<br />

<strong>for</strong>mat.<br />

As per amended RFP<br />

As per RFP<br />

As per amended RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

27 48 Operating System (Latest) Please define your requirement. As per amended RFP<br />

28 22 24 (d) Negotiations In our opinion, this clause is not as per industry practices and can put a<br />

question mark on entire tender process.<br />

As per RFP<br />

Kindly reconsider your position on the same and delete the option <strong>of</strong> giving<br />

"written counter <strong>of</strong>fer" to lowest and /or other bidders.<br />

We also request department to specify the basis <strong>of</strong> this "Written Counter<br />

Offer".<br />

29 22 24 (d) Best Value <strong>Bid</strong>der Please provide the definition <strong>of</strong> "best value bidder". "best value bidder" shall be<br />

considered as the responsive and<br />

eligible <strong>Bid</strong>der who has quoted the<br />

lowest price <strong>for</strong> and selected through<br />

this tendering process.<br />

30 Per<strong>for</strong>mance Security Deposit- f(iii)<br />

to adjust any dues against the firm<br />

from any other contract with RISL.<br />

i) …. Such as severing future<br />

business relation or black listing etc.<br />

Please reconsider your position and we propose that black listing should be<br />

purely on corrupt and fraudulent practices as GF&AR.<br />

As per RFP<br />

As per RFP<br />

31 30 (b) Right to<br />

Vary<br />

Changes <strong>of</strong> <strong>Bid</strong> Quantity- If the<br />

work order is placed up to 100% in<br />

<strong>Bid</strong>der should be assigned single PO <strong>for</strong> the Final quantity with decreased or<br />

Increased <strong>of</strong> <strong>Bid</strong> quantity. And additional PO <strong>for</strong> additional quantity shall be<br />

Quantities excess <strong>of</strong> the quantities mentioned supplied subject to prevailing price quoted by the bidder.<br />

: in the bidding document, the bidder<br />

shall be bound to meet the required<br />

<strong>supply</strong><br />

As per RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

32 23 26 (d) If the issuance <strong>of</strong> <strong>for</strong>mal Work<br />

Order is likely to take time, a Letter<br />

<strong>of</strong> Intent (LOI) may be sent<br />

Pursuant to this clause, please specify the start <strong>of</strong> delivery date. Would it be The start <strong>of</strong> the delivery date shall be<br />

from the date <strong>of</strong> issue <strong>of</strong> LoI or Work Order (WO) or acceptance <strong>of</strong> <strong>for</strong>mal WO from the Date <strong>of</strong> Issue <strong>of</strong> Work<br />

by vendor?<br />

Order.<br />

33 30 9 (d) Delivery - Shifting the place <strong>of</strong><br />

delivery destination:<br />

RISL/Department <strong>of</strong> Education shall<br />

be free to shift the place <strong>of</strong> delivery<br />

within the same district. The<br />

successful/ selected bidder shall<br />

provide all assistance including<br />

transportation in shifting <strong>of</strong> the<br />

delivered Items.<br />

34 33 20 ( c) ii Packing and Documents - The above<br />

<strong>Laptops</strong> shall be packed in cartons<br />

as per requirements <strong>of</strong><br />

"distribution to individual District<br />

locations / Institutions / District<br />

Education Officer’s (DEO) <strong>of</strong>fice"<br />

Please specify the number <strong>of</strong> such instances as same would affect the pricing.<br />

In-case it is difficult to specify the same at this stage, we would request<br />

department to reimburse the vendor with actual cost.<br />

Please specify the number <strong>of</strong> locations or institutions / DEO <strong>of</strong>fice be<strong>for</strong>e<br />

hand that is be<strong>for</strong>e submission <strong>of</strong> financial bid.<br />

As per RFP<br />

As per RFP<br />

Final locations shall be provided to<br />

successful bidder.<br />

35 47 Annexure-<br />

1<br />

Details <strong>of</strong> exact location <strong>for</strong> delivery<br />

at the District Headquarter shall be<br />

provided by RISL/ Department<br />

<strong>of</strong> Education, GoR to the successful<br />

bidder be<strong>for</strong>e the time <strong>of</strong> final<br />

delivery.<br />

Please specify the exact location <strong>for</strong> deliveries as this has financial<br />

implications<br />

Final locations shall be provided to<br />

successful bidder.


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

36 48 Operating<br />

System/M<br />

S Office<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

Related to bid estimated price<br />

We understand from bid document that department have provisioned a<br />

budget <strong>of</strong> INR 246.00 Crores <strong>for</strong> 56000 numbers <strong>of</strong> laptops. Based on this<br />

fact, budgeted per unit price stands at INR 21964.00 including all taxes.<br />

Further, we have understood from pre-bid meeting dated 9-Jan, that<br />

Micros<strong>of</strong>t component would be costing INR 2200.00 minimum.<br />

This takes the budgeted prices <strong>for</strong> hardware to INR 19764.00 and it is not in<br />

sync. with prevalent market environment.<br />

We hereby propose department to buy MS component separately directly<br />

from MS.<br />

As per RFP<br />

37 48 Annexure<br />

: 2 A<br />

OS: MS Windows 2007 Home Basic<br />

or Windows 8, whichever is latest<br />

launched and available in India at<br />

the time <strong>of</strong> delivery (National<br />

Academic) on Shape the Future SKU<br />

<strong>of</strong>fered by Micros<strong>of</strong>t to<br />

Government <strong>of</strong> <strong>Rajasthan</strong> under<br />

MoU<br />

Please amend the OS as MS Win 7 Home Basic. Secondly please specify exact<br />

version <strong>of</strong> the OS as per the MOU signed between MS & Govt. <strong>of</strong> <strong>Rajasthan</strong>.<br />

As per amended RFP<br />

38 48 Annexure<br />

: 2 A<br />

……..SKU with MS Visio , <strong>of</strong>fered by<br />

Micros<strong>of</strong>t to Government <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Rajasthan</strong> under MoU<br />

We are opinion that MS Visio is a s<strong>of</strong>tware application meant <strong>for</strong> engineering<br />

students and we do not see any utility <strong>for</strong> students in Class VIII, X & XII.<br />

Further, there is no eco-system existing <strong>for</strong> getting training on this s<strong>of</strong>tware.<br />

Can you reconsider your position on this requirement and do the needful to<br />

modify technical specifications accordingly.<br />

As per RFP<br />

39 61 Annexure-<br />

12<br />

COMPONENTS OFFERED – BoM Please elaborate what is expected out <strong>of</strong> this Annexure-12 from us. Detail as required in the Annexure<br />

indicating make and mode <strong>of</strong> the<br />

laptop and reference and page<br />

number in the datasheet <strong>for</strong><br />

complying the technical<br />

specifications as specified in<br />

Annexure-2.<br />

40 9 CHAPTER<br />

3:<br />

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA<br />

We are assuming that this as per GF&AR and Government's procurement<br />

policy. Kindly confirm.<br />

As per RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

41 16 5 (d) The submitted Laptop Test Report<br />

shall not be dated more than two<br />

months prior to the last date <strong>of</strong><br />

submission <strong>of</strong> <strong>Bid</strong>s.<br />

As discussed during pre-bid meeting, we are expecting that test report dated<br />

four to six months prior to the last date <strong>of</strong> submission <strong>of</strong> bids can also be<br />

accepted. Please confirm.<br />

As per amended RFP<br />

42 48, 50 Processor<br />

& Qualify<br />

Bench<br />

mark<br />

In today's scenario, it is becoming difficult to specify the CPU requirement as<br />

is evident <strong>for</strong>m the discussion at pre-bid meeting.<br />

But we appreciate the ef<strong>for</strong>ts put-in by department to mention the<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance bench marking with a score <strong>of</strong> 115 and latest generation X86<br />

dual core architecture processor. We, being one <strong>of</strong> the leading manufacturer<br />

<strong>of</strong> laptops and having India centric focus, are also <strong>of</strong> opinion that this rating is<br />

more than suitable. Your ask <strong>of</strong> ETDC / STQC certificate <strong>for</strong> the same would<br />

give all bidders a level playing field.<br />

As per RFP<br />

43 48, 50 Processor Further, as discussed during pre-bid meeting, we request you to allow each<br />

bidder to <strong>of</strong>fer two different models with these major CPU manufacturers'<br />

products with a instruction to bidders to quote only one price <strong>for</strong> both<br />

models. Please note that same would help the bidder to <strong>of</strong>fer better pricing<br />

and would also increase the competition and participation. Also note that<br />

many state government / organization / PSUs are allowing the same.<br />

As per RFP<br />

44 50 Education<br />

content<br />

*- The Education content on CD<br />

shall be provided by Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Education to RISL and the same<br />

shall be…<br />

Such educational content have to be loaded be<strong>for</strong>e pre-dispatch inspection.<br />

In case <strong>of</strong> delay by RISL / DoE <strong>of</strong> give the content to the bidder, the bidder<br />

shall not be liable <strong>for</strong> delay. Please confirm.<br />

Agreed.<br />

As per amended RFP<br />

45 41 CHAPTER<br />

6: TERMS<br />

AND<br />

CONDITIO<br />

NS OF<br />

TENDER &<br />

CONTRAC<br />

T<br />

35. c. Due Payments shall be made<br />

promptly by the purchaser,<br />

generally within sixty (60) days after<br />

submission <strong>of</strong> an invoice or request<br />

<strong>for</strong> payment by the supplier/<br />

selected bidder, and the purchaser<br />

has accepted it.<br />

35. c. Due Payments shall be made promptly by the purchaser, generally<br />

within thirty (30) days after submission <strong>of</strong> an invoice or request <strong>for</strong> payment<br />

by the supplier/ selected bidder, and the purchaser has accepted it.<br />

As per RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

46 44 CHAPTER<br />

6: TERMS<br />

AND<br />

CONDITIO<br />

NS OF<br />

TENDER &<br />

CONTRAC<br />

T<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

37. b. iii. That the products and<br />

technology delivered to<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Education or RISL<br />

during the contract term or on<br />

expiry <strong>of</strong> the contract duration<br />

should not be sold or re-used or<br />

copied or transferred by bidder to<br />

other locations apart from the<br />

locations mentioned in the this bid<br />

document without prior written<br />

notice and approval <strong>of</strong> Department<br />

<strong>of</strong> Education or RISL. Supplied<br />

hardware, s<strong>of</strong>tware & documents<br />

etc., used by bidder <strong>for</strong> Department<br />

<strong>of</strong> Education or RISL shall be the<br />

legal properties <strong>of</strong> Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Education or RISL.<br />

We are not able to understand the context. Pls. clarify?<br />

Refers to educational content, other<br />

s<strong>of</strong>tware and documents submitted<br />

to RISL/ Department <strong>of</strong> Education as<br />

part <strong>of</strong> this contract.<br />

As per RFP<br />

47 New Proposed clause: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the Agreement, in the<br />

event <strong>of</strong> termination <strong>of</strong> the Agreement by RISL <strong>for</strong> any reason whatsoever,<br />

RISL shall pay the selected <strong>Bid</strong>der the following amounts:<br />

As per RFP<br />

48 Consequences <strong>of</strong> Termination (a) The Agreement Price, attributable to the parts <strong>of</strong> the work(s) executed<br />

including Goods / <strong>Laptops</strong> and Related Services delivered (including also the<br />

Work in Progress) by the selected <strong>Bid</strong>der up to the date <strong>of</strong> termination. In<br />

respect <strong>of</strong> capital items deployed in the project, RISL must purchase at the<br />

Written Down Value (WDV) from the selected <strong>Bid</strong>der all IT & non-IT<br />

infrastructure and the s<strong>of</strong>tware deployed. Written Down Value (WDV) shall<br />

be computed at depreciated value by applying ten per cent (10%)<br />

depreciation per annum on written down value basis, on the value <strong>of</strong> the<br />

infrastructure deployed hereunder. VAT and other taxes as applicable shall be<br />

payable by RISL on such WDV. In case RISL is unable to purchase as<br />

mentioned above, RISL must pay as Liquidated Damages on written down<br />

value <strong>of</strong> all IT & non-IT infrastructure and the s<strong>of</strong>tware deployed by applying<br />

depreciation @ fifteen per cent (15%) per annum.<br />

As per RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

49 (b) The costs reasonably incurred by the Vendor in the ramp down /<br />

disengagement <strong>of</strong> selected <strong>Bid</strong>der’s personnel;<br />

As per RFP<br />

50 (c) Any amount to be paid by the selected <strong>Bid</strong>der to its sub-vendor’s in<br />

connection with the termination <strong>of</strong> any sub-vendor’s, including any<br />

cancellation charges;<br />

As per RFP<br />

51 (d) Costs incurred by the selected <strong>Bid</strong>der in protecting the work(s) and leaving<br />

the site in a clean and safe condition pursuant to this clause; and<br />

As per RFP<br />

52 (e) The cost <strong>of</strong> satisfying all other obligations, commitments, and claims that<br />

the selected <strong>Bid</strong>der may in good faith have undertaken with third parties in<br />

connection with the Agreement Work in progress.<br />

As per RFP<br />

53 The term “work in progress” shall include but not limited to the value <strong>of</strong><br />

Goods / <strong>Laptops</strong> meant <strong>for</strong> delivery to RISL (i) <strong>for</strong> which manufacturing<br />

process was initiated by the selected <strong>Bid</strong>der; or (ii) order was placed by the<br />

selected <strong>Bid</strong>der on its sub-vendor’s, prior to the date <strong>of</strong> termination.<br />

As per RFP<br />

54 New Proposed clause: The selected<br />

<strong>Bid</strong>der’s right to Termination<br />

By the Selected <strong>Bid</strong>der:<br />

As per RFP<br />

55 The Selected <strong>Bid</strong>der may terminate this Agreement, by not less than thirty<br />

(30) days‟ written notice to RISL, in case <strong>of</strong> the occurrence <strong>of</strong> any <strong>of</strong> the<br />

events specified in paragraphs (i) through (iv) <strong>of</strong> this Clause:<br />

As per RFP<br />

56 i. If RISL fails to pay any money due to the Selected <strong>Bid</strong>der pursuant to this<br />

Agreement within thirty (30) days after receiving written notice from the<br />

Selected <strong>Bid</strong>der that such payment is overdue.<br />

57 iii. If RSIL fails to comply with any final decision reached as a result <strong>of</strong><br />

arbitration pursuant to this Agreement.<br />

58 iv. If RSIL is in material breach <strong>of</strong> its obligations pursuant to this Agreement<br />

and has not remedied the same within <strong>for</strong>ty-five (45) days (or such longer<br />

period as the Selected <strong>Bid</strong>der may have subsequently approved in writing)<br />

following the receipt by RSIL <strong>of</strong> the Selected <strong>Bid</strong>der’s notice specifying such<br />

breach.<br />

As per RFP<br />

As per RFP<br />

As per RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

59 New Proposed Clause: Pro-rata<br />

reduction <strong>of</strong> Per<strong>for</strong>mance Bank<br />

Guarantee<br />

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the Agreement, the<br />

Per<strong>for</strong>mance Bank Guarantee shall be reduced pro rata by the portion <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Agreement value payable <strong>for</strong> any Good(s) that have been delivered by the<br />

selected <strong>Bid</strong>der and achieved Acceptance / Deemed Acceptance.<br />

PBG shall be 5% <strong>of</strong> the Order value<br />

60 New Proposed Clause: Change in<br />

tax<br />

61 New Proposed Clause: Interest on<br />

Delayed payment and right to<br />

suspend and terminate<br />

In case any national or state statute or any local law or regulation or by-law <strong>of</strong><br />

any duly constituted authority is changed or comes into <strong>for</strong>ce which results in<br />

extra costs/tax in relation to the provision <strong>of</strong> the Goods / Related Services,<br />

the consequential effect shall be to the account <strong>of</strong> RSIL and the same shall be<br />

borne by RSIL.<br />

RSIL shall release the payment due to the selected <strong>Bid</strong>der on or be<strong>for</strong>e the<br />

due date. Late payments shall automatically bear interest at an annual rate<br />

equal to 18% per annum compounded quarterly <strong>for</strong> the relevant delayed<br />

period, calculated from the date due until date <strong>of</strong> full payment.<br />

As per RFP<br />

As per RFP<br />

62 In the event RSIL fails to pay any amount to the selected <strong>Bid</strong>der on the due<br />

date, then and without prejudice to the exercise <strong>of</strong> any other rights or<br />

remedies which may be available to it and without incurring any penalties or<br />

liabilities, the selected <strong>Bid</strong>der shall be entitled to suspend per<strong>for</strong>mance <strong>of</strong> its<br />

obligations under the Agreement, following written notification to RSIL, until<br />

realization <strong>of</strong> full outstanding amount in respect <strong>of</strong> the Goods/ Related<br />

Services actually delivered and rendered and not paid <strong>for</strong>. In the event <strong>of</strong><br />

suspension by the selected <strong>Bid</strong>der <strong>of</strong> the Agreement, the time schedule shall<br />

be automatically extended <strong>for</strong> the actual duration <strong>of</strong> the suspension and the<br />

selected <strong>Bid</strong>der shall be reimbursed by RSIL <strong>for</strong> any damage or additional cost<br />

incurred as a result <strong>of</strong> such suspension. If suspension period exceeds two<br />

months, the selected <strong>Bid</strong>der shall have the right to terminate the Agreement.<br />

As per RFP<br />

63 24 30 Right to Vary Quantities: Right to Vary Quantities: As per RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

64 a.At the time the Contract is<br />

awarded, the quantity <strong>of</strong> Goods and<br />

Related Services originally specified<br />

in the bidding document may be<br />

increased or decreased but without<br />

any change in the unit prices or<br />

other terms and conditions <strong>of</strong> the<br />

bid and the bidding document.<br />

a.At the time the Contract is awarded, the quantity <strong>of</strong> Goods and Related<br />

Services originally specified in the bidding document may be increased or<br />

decreased but without any change in the unit prices or other terms and<br />

conditions <strong>of</strong> the bid and the bidding document. However, such decrease<br />

cannot exceed more than ten percent <strong>of</strong> the Contract value.<br />

As per RFP<br />

65 30 CHAPTER<br />

6: TERMS<br />

AND<br />

CONDITIO<br />

NS OF<br />

TENDER &<br />

CONTRAC<br />

T<br />

9 d.Shifting the place <strong>of</strong> delivery<br />

destination: RISL/Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Education shall be free to shift the<br />

place <strong>of</strong> delivery within the same<br />

district. The successful/ selected<br />

bidder shall provide all assistance<br />

including transportation in shifting<br />

<strong>of</strong> the delivered Items.<br />

9 d.Shifting the place <strong>of</strong> delivery destination: RISL/Department <strong>of</strong> Education<br />

shall be free to shift the place <strong>of</strong> delivery within the same district. The<br />

successful/ selected bidder shall provide all assistance including<br />

transportation in shifting <strong>of</strong> the delivered Items. The selected bidder shall be<br />

allowed to cost additionally in case RISL / Dept. <strong>of</strong> Education exercises the<br />

option to shift the place <strong>of</strong> delivery within the same district.<br />

As per RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

66 34 CHAPTER<br />

6: TERMS<br />

AND<br />

CONDITIO<br />

NS OF<br />

TENDER &<br />

CONTRAC<br />

T<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

23. c. RISL may conduct inspection<br />

<strong>for</strong> which the cost shall be borne by<br />

the RISL. RISL shall undertake the<br />

pre-delivery inspection <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Laptops</strong> in accordance to the<br />

standard procedures being followed<br />

by RISL in Quality Inspection. The<br />

inspection team shall prepare a<br />

Report specifying satisfactory<br />

operational condition <strong>of</strong> the<br />

inspected laptops, gaps identified<br />

and necessary corrective<br />

measurements required by the<br />

<strong>Bid</strong>der. If RISL takes more than 3<br />

days to conduct the <strong>Pre</strong>- Delivery<br />

Inspection, the delay beyond 3 days<br />

shall not be taken into account <strong>for</strong><br />

the purposes <strong>of</strong> imposing liquidated<br />

damages.<br />

23. c. RISL may conduct inspection <strong>for</strong> which the cost shall be borne by the<br />

RISL. RISL shall undertake the pre-delivery inspection <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Laptops</strong> in<br />

accordance to the standard procedures being followed by RISL in Quality<br />

Inspection. The inspection team shall prepare a Report specifying satisfactory<br />

operational condition <strong>of</strong> the inspected laptops, gaps identified and necessary<br />

corrective measurements required by the <strong>Bid</strong>der. If RISL takes more than 3<br />

days to conduct the <strong>Pre</strong>- Delivery Inspection, the delay beyond 3 days shall<br />

not be taken into account <strong>for</strong> the purposes <strong>of</strong> imposing liquidated damages<br />

and the lot <strong>of</strong> Goods will be considered as deemed accepted and ready <strong>for</strong><br />

delivery.<br />

As per RFP<br />

67 48 Memory Memory Please specify whether you need DDR-3 or DDR-4 RAM. Is the frequency<br />

asked is working frequency <strong>for</strong> the RAM. Kindly confirm<br />

As per RFP<br />

68 24 28 -<br />

Conflict <strong>of</strong><br />

interest<br />

Conflict <strong>of</strong> Interest<br />

We are assuming that definition <strong>of</strong> "party' is the bidding company (bidder)<br />

itself and all its subsidiaries. Kindly confirm.<br />

As per RFP<br />

69 9 Point 1 Eligibility Criteria We request you to please allow channel partner with one <strong>Bid</strong>der one OEM<br />

policy.<br />

As per RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

70<br />

9<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Chapter 3:<br />

Eligibility<br />

Criteria:<br />

Laptop<br />

Sales in<br />

India<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

The <strong>Bid</strong>der should have sold<br />

minimum 50000 (Fifty Thousand<br />

only) <strong>Laptops</strong> in India each year<br />

during the last three financial year<br />

i.e. 2009-2010, 2010-2011 and<br />

2011-2012<br />

Request <strong>for</strong> change the clause to total <strong>of</strong> 1.5 Lakhs unit in last 3 calendar<br />

years instead f existing clause “The <strong>Bid</strong>der should have sold minimum <strong>of</strong> 1.5<br />

Lakh notebooks in India in last 3 calendar years i.e. from 1st January 2010 to<br />

31st December 2012”<br />

As per amended RFP<br />

71<br />

11<br />

Comprehe<br />

nsive<br />

OEM<br />

Warranty<br />

and<br />

support<br />

services<br />

Provide comprehensive OEM<br />

warranty and support services<br />

through the designated Support<br />

Service Centres available at all the<br />

33 Districts<br />

Since the warranty has to be provided onsite, request you to remove clause As per amended RFP<br />

<strong>of</strong> having service centres at all 33 districts. Vendors cannot have 33 service<br />

centres / franchisees <strong>for</strong> services, since it is impossible to manage these many<br />

franchisees in the state and their are certain criteria <strong>for</strong> selecting a service<br />

franchisee. Vendors can have maximum <strong>of</strong> 2-3 service centres whose<br />

engineers are spread across the state <strong>for</strong> manage services <strong>of</strong> machines. These<br />

engineers does not have <strong>of</strong>fices, but they operate out <strong>of</strong> these regions. Hence<br />

request you to kindly change the clause to have engineers at all locations with<br />

engineer contact details. Vendors can be monitored on SLA, as per RFP.<br />

Current clause is not practically possible. Request honorable committee<br />

members to consider this suggestion.<br />

72<br />

12<br />

Help Desk<br />

Setup:<br />

Pay Rs. 10000/- per seat per month<br />

and the cost <strong>of</strong> taking connection<br />

<strong>for</strong> Toll-Free number as well as the<br />

recurring rent and call charges <strong>for</strong><br />

the Toll-Free numbers<br />

The working hours specified cannot be maintained by 2 help desk executives.<br />

As per working hours, atleast 4 resources has to be deployed to meet. Hence<br />

request to confirm the same.<br />

As per amended RFP<br />

73<br />

18<br />

EMD<br />

To adjust any dues against the firm<br />

from any other contract with RISL.<br />

1. We request honorable committee members <strong>for</strong> deleting this clause. Due<br />

adjustment should be specific to the project, but not to be from some other<br />

security deposit or dues. One project should not be linked to other one.<br />

2. Also pls allow us to submit EMD in the <strong>for</strong>m <strong>of</strong> <strong>Bid</strong> Boud BG. PBG is<br />

specifically <strong>for</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance. Also allow us to submit the bid bound BG in<br />

bank <strong>for</strong>mat.<br />

1. As per RFP<br />

2. As per amended RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

74<br />

18<br />

75<br />

21<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

EMD Refer RFP In case <strong>of</strong> any <strong>for</strong>tfieght, we request you to kindly give atleast 30 days notice<br />

to the vendor.<br />

Taxes<br />

The evaluation shall include all<br />

costs and all taxes and duties<br />

applicable to the bidder as per law<br />

<strong>of</strong><br />

the Central/ State Government/<br />

Local Authorities<br />

We request you to allow us to quote the prices, <strong>for</strong> statutory levies, at extra.<br />

Any increase or decrease in price due to changes in statutory levies like<br />

excise, VAT, customs etc, will be duly passed on to the customer<br />

Request to Insert the below clauses :<br />

Any new levy <strong>of</strong> any tax, duty or cess etc will be passed over to the<br />

department.<br />

As per RFP<br />

As per RFP<br />

Please refer clause "<strong>Bid</strong> Prices" and<br />

"Taxes and duties" as menioned in<br />

the RFP<br />

76<br />

24<br />

Changes<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Bid</strong><br />

Quantity<br />

Refer RFP<br />

Prices are quoted with respect to the quantity, hence request to cap<br />

increase/ decrease <strong>of</strong> qty ordered, max upto 10% and only after the<br />

concurrence <strong>of</strong> the seller. This clause badly impacts the overall commercials.<br />

As per RFP<br />

77<br />

78<br />

79<br />

25<br />

25<br />

29<br />

Reservatio<br />

n <strong>of</strong><br />

Rights<br />

Monitorin<br />

g <strong>of</strong><br />

Contract<br />

Delivery<br />

and<br />

Installatio<br />

n<br />

Refer RFP Pls delete As per RFP<br />

Refer RFP Pls delete As per RFP<br />

The contract <strong>for</strong> the <strong>supply</strong> can be<br />

repudiated at any time by the<br />

purchase <strong>of</strong>ficer, if the supplies<br />

are not made to his satisfaction<br />

after giving an opportunity to the<br />

bidder <strong>of</strong> being heard and<br />

recording the reasons <strong>for</strong><br />

repudiation.<br />

We request honorable committee members <strong>for</strong> change in this clause. Any<br />

repudiation should be done only after providing <strong>for</strong> a notice period <strong>of</strong> 30 days<br />

to cure the default<br />

As per RFP<br />

80<br />

30<br />

Per<strong>for</strong>ma<br />

nce<br />

Security<br />

Deposit<br />

f(iii) to adjust any dues against the<br />

firm from any other contract with<br />

RISL.<br />

i) …. Such as severing future<br />

business relation or black listing etc.<br />

Blacklisting should be purely on corrupt and fraudulent practices, as asked in<br />

this bid. In case <strong>of</strong> default, department can <strong>for</strong>feited the EMD specific to this<br />

project, but not blacklist. Blacklisting impacts the overall company throughout<br />

nationally.<br />

As per RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

81<br />

30<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

PSD Refer RFP We request honorable committee members <strong>for</strong> change <strong>for</strong>1: Pls delete - "To<br />

adjust any dues against the firm from any other contract with RISL."<br />

2: Any <strong>for</strong>feiture should be done only after providing <strong>for</strong> a notice period <strong>of</strong> 30<br />

days to cure the default.<br />

3: Pls delete - "Forfeiture <strong>of</strong> EMD/PSD shall be without prejudice to any other<br />

right <strong>of</strong> RISL to claim any damages as admissible under the law as well as to<br />

take such action against the Supplier/ Selected <strong>Bid</strong>der such as severing future<br />

business relation or black listing, etc".<br />

As per RFP<br />

82<br />

32<br />

Subcontra<br />

ct<br />

Refer RFP<br />

Maintenance <strong>of</strong> services through service franchisee or authorized partner<br />

should not be considered as sub contracting. Please confirm, if our<br />

understanding is correct.<br />

As per RFP<br />

83<br />

32<br />

Insurance a.The Goods supplied under the<br />

Contract shall be fully insured<br />

against loss by theft, destruction or<br />

damage incidental to manufacture<br />

or acquisition, transportation,<br />

storage, fire, flood, under exposure<br />

to weather and delivery at the<br />

designates project locations, in<br />

accordance with the applicable<br />

terms. The insurance charges will<br />

be borne by the supplier and<br />

Purchaser will not be required to<br />

pay such charges if incurred.<br />

Insurance required till when? Pls clarify. We understand that it is till delivery.<br />

Pls confirm.<br />

As per RFP<br />

84<br />

34<br />

Insurance Refer RFP<br />

Pls confirm <strong>for</strong> transit insurance upto delivery. Once the delivery challan is<br />

signed insurance will end and ownership will get transferred to department.<br />

As per RFP<br />

Please read the clause 21 (Insurance )<br />

carefully.


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

85<br />

86<br />

35<br />

38<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

LD Refer RFP 1. We would request the customer to modify this as "LD/ penalty <strong>for</strong> delay<br />

shall be levied at 0.5% per week <strong>for</strong> the late delivery/ undelivered portion <strong>of</strong><br />

the equipment with a maximum <strong>of</strong> 5% <strong>of</strong> the late delivery / undelivered<br />

portion <strong>of</strong> the equipment value.<br />

2. Not withstanding anything contained in this tender the maximum LD/<br />

Penalty should be capped @ 5 % cost <strong>of</strong> the undelivered/delayed delivered<br />

portion <strong>of</strong> the material.<br />

Limitation<br />

<strong>of</strong> Liability<br />

AS per draft<br />

Request <strong>for</strong> change in language to "Vendor shall not be liable <strong>for</strong> any<br />

indirect, punitive, consequential or incidental loss, damage, claims, liabilities,<br />

charges, costs, expense or injury, including, without limitation, loss <strong>of</strong> use,<br />

data, revenue, pr<strong>of</strong>its, business interruption, and loss <strong>of</strong> income or pr<strong>of</strong>its,<br />

that may arise out <strong>of</strong> or result from this Agreement, irrespective <strong>of</strong> whether it<br />

had an advance notice <strong>of</strong> the possibility <strong>of</strong> any such damages. The aggregate<br />

liability <strong>of</strong> Vendor under this Agreement, regardless <strong>of</strong> the <strong>for</strong>m <strong>of</strong> the claim,<br />

shall not exceed the: (i) order value in case <strong>of</strong> products; (ii) fees received by<br />

Vendor under this Agreement during the six months preceding the date <strong>of</strong><br />

such claim, in case <strong>of</strong> services.<br />

As per RFP<br />

As per RFP<br />

Vendor’s failure to per<strong>for</strong>m its contractual responsibilities, to per<strong>for</strong>m the<br />

services, or to meet agreed service levels shall be excused if and to the extent<br />

Vendor’s non-per<strong>for</strong>mance is caused by Customer’s omission to act, delay,<br />

wrongful action, failure to provide inputs, or failure to per<strong>for</strong>m its obligations<br />

under this Agreement."<br />

87<br />

39<br />

Terminati<br />

on <strong>for</strong><br />

Default<br />

AS per draft<br />

The Purchaser, without prejudice to any other remedy <strong>for</strong> breach <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Agreement, by written notice <strong>of</strong> 30 days <strong>of</strong> default sent to the Supplier, may<br />

terminate this Agreement in whole or in part:<br />

As per RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

88<br />

39<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Change<br />

Orders<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

Refer RFP<br />

We request <strong>for</strong> change in clause to 1: Any change order and amendment can<br />

be done only on mutual basis. Further vendor should have the right <strong>of</strong> refusal<br />

without incurring any liability <strong>for</strong> <strong>for</strong>feiture <strong>of</strong> EMD/PBG or incurring any<br />

penalty/charge.<br />

2: Price <strong>for</strong> any change order to be mutually agreed on equitable basis.<br />

3: pls delete - "Prices to be charged by the supplier/ selected bidder <strong>for</strong> any<br />

related services that might be needed<br />

but which were not included in the Contract shall be agreed upon in advance<br />

by the parties and shall not exceed the prevailing rates charged to other<br />

parties by the supplier/ selected bidder <strong>for</strong> similar services."<br />

As per RFP<br />

89<br />

40<br />

Settlemen<br />

t <strong>of</strong><br />

Disputes<br />

AS per draft<br />

Any disputes shall be first resolved amicably by discussion between the As per RFP<br />

Vendor and Customer, failing which the same shall be referred to and shall be<br />

settled by binding arbitration conducted by a sole arbitrator jointly appointed<br />

by both parties and governed by the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.<br />

90<br />

41<br />

Payment<br />

Term<br />

Refer RFP<br />

We request <strong>for</strong> change in payment term. We are anyway submitting security<br />

<strong>for</strong> the purpose <strong>of</strong> SLA monitoring. Pls change the clause to - 90% on delivery<br />

and 10% on installation and submission <strong>of</strong> bank guarantee <strong>for</strong> 10% <strong>of</strong><br />

contract value.<br />

In case where site is not ready or any default because <strong>of</strong> buyer, full 100%<br />

payment has to be released within 30 days <strong>of</strong> delivery <strong>of</strong> goods to site.<br />

Full payment has to be made within 30 days <strong>of</strong> submission <strong>of</strong> invoice., Else<br />

penal charges <strong>of</strong> 1% pm or part there<strong>of</strong> will be levied.<br />

As per RFP<br />

91<br />

SLA and<br />

Penalty<br />

Please confirm that the penalty will be caped to maximum <strong>of</strong> 5% <strong>of</strong> total<br />

contract value.<br />

As per amended RFP<br />

42


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

92<br />

43<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Title and<br />

Risk<br />

Transfer<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

All title <strong>of</strong> the assets to be<br />

transferred to Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Education or RISL or its<br />

nominated agencies pursuant to<br />

clause(s) above shall be transferred<br />

on the last day <strong>of</strong><br />

the exit management period<br />

Vendor assumes that the title <strong>of</strong> ownership <strong>of</strong> the goods supplied under this<br />

contract is passed on the customer on delivering the material to the<br />

customer. Request your confirmation on this. Without this, revenue will not<br />

get recognized.<br />

As per amended RFP<br />

93<br />

43<br />

Exit<br />

Managem<br />

ent<br />

Refer RFP<br />

Vendor should not bear any cost or penalty or charge w.r.t Exit management.<br />

Buyer should bear all cost and charges. Also as per the clause number 37 B<br />

(iii) B page number 43, assets will get transferred after 3 years, which means<br />

the revenue will not get recognized <strong>for</strong> bidder <strong>for</strong> 3 years. Request you to<br />

kindly delete this clause. This is very important clause <strong>for</strong> deletion. Request<br />

you to kindly delete.<br />

As per amended RFP<br />

94<br />

48<br />

Laptop<br />

Processor<br />

Latest generation X86, Dual Core<br />

(Intel Pentium/AMD Processor with<br />

processor Speed <strong>of</strong> 2.0 GHZ or<br />

higher with 2MB cache)<br />

Request you to kindly remove Pentium as a sub brand from the processor<br />

required from Intel, as the per<strong>for</strong>mance is being bench marked by the<br />

SYSmark rating mentioned in the tender document. Hence pls change the<br />

processor to "X86 dual core architecture " to avoid any confusion in plat<strong>for</strong>m<br />

available."<br />

As per RFP<br />

95<br />

Bill <strong>of</strong><br />

Material<br />

We request department to please clarify what is meant the Period <strong>of</strong> end <strong>of</strong><br />

Service as it is mentioned to be 24 months where as the warranty is 12<br />

months<br />

End <strong>of</strong> service is the period <strong>for</strong> which<br />

the OEM supports the product in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> repair, spare parts etc.<br />

47<br />

Warranty shall be provided by the<br />

bidder <strong>for</strong> 1 year however OEM shall<br />

support the product <strong>for</strong> next 24<br />

months<br />

96<br />

49<br />

Technical<br />

Specificati<br />

on<br />

Optical Drive<br />

Please change the speed <strong>of</strong> the DVRW to 8x as that is the speed that we get in<br />

case <strong>of</strong> Slim DVDRW which are used in notebooks<br />

As per amended RFP<br />

97<br />

49<br />

Technical<br />

Specificati<br />

on<br />

AC Power Adapter<br />

Request you to change the same to 110-240V as that is the industry standard,<br />

however the same would be tested to operate within the given range <strong>of</strong> 110-<br />

250V<br />

As per RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

98<br />

49<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Technical<br />

Specificati<br />

on<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

Battery Type<br />

Request you to change the battery back-up required to 3 hours as that a<br />

47Whr battery given in standard test conditions.<br />

As per RFP<br />

99<br />

50<br />

Technical<br />

Specificati<br />

on<br />

Qualifying Benchmark Please confirm whether the test score has to be given with Windows 7<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essional which is generally the case or Windows 7 Home Basic which is<br />

the OS been given along with the machine, this is currently not clear as the<br />

requirement mentions that the score should be <strong>of</strong> the machine been<br />

supplied.<br />

As per amended RFP<br />

100<br />

24-25<br />

Signing <strong>of</strong><br />

Contract<br />

We request committee member to consider that Contract to be on mutually<br />

accepted terms and conditions. Wipro needs to have an option to accept/<br />

reject applicable T&Cs.<br />

As per RFP<br />

101<br />

31-32<br />

Confidenti<br />

al<br />

In<strong>for</strong>mati<br />

on<br />

Notwithstanding anything contained to the contrary herein, Wipro may share<br />

Contract/engagement/ project details and relevant documentation to its<br />

customers/ prospective customers solely <strong>for</strong> the purpose <strong>of</strong> and with the<br />

intent to evidence and support its experience earned under this Contract.<br />

Confidentiality obligations to survive <strong>for</strong> a period <strong>of</strong> 3 years post disclosure <strong>of</strong><br />

any confidential in<strong>for</strong>mation.<br />

As per RFP<br />

102 Risk<br />

Purchase<br />

If Wipro, having been notified, fails to remedy the defect(s)/delays within<br />

thirty (30) days from date <strong>of</strong> receipt <strong>of</strong> notice <strong>of</strong> breach by Client and the<br />

defect becomes irremediable at Wipro's end, the Client may procure<br />

substitute goods/services from any third party and require Wipro to<br />

reimburse the Client <strong>for</strong> any additional costs incurred in procuring such<br />

goods/services from a third party up to a maximum incremental charges not<br />

exceeding 10% (Ten Percent) <strong>of</strong> the amount paid or payable if the<br />

goods/services are procured from Wipro. Risk Purchase only in case <strong>of</strong> full<br />

partial termination. This claim shall be payable if the Parties have failed to<br />

reach a resolution as per the dispute resolution process as agreed upon.<br />

As per RFP<br />

103 Sample Do we need to submit a sample <strong>of</strong> the machine been supplied to RISL or not,<br />

also clarify if a sample is required then what is the no. to be submitted.<br />

As per amended RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

104 Site Not<br />

Ready<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

Wipro assumes that the sites shall be kept ready <strong>for</strong> installations and<br />

acceptance well be<strong>for</strong>e deliveries. However, in case the installation/<br />

acceptance gets delayed beyond 15 days <strong>of</strong> delivery, due to sites not ready or<br />

any other reason attributable to the customer, the equipment shall be<br />

deemed to have been installed and commissioned <strong>for</strong> the purpose <strong>of</strong><br />

payment, warranty, title transfer or any other related clause.<br />

As per RFP<br />

105 Deemed<br />

Acceptanc<br />

e<br />

Deliverables will be deemed to be fully and finally accepted by Client in the<br />

event Client has not submitted a Acceptance certificate within 15 days from<br />

the date <strong>of</strong> installation/commissioning or when Client uses the Deliverable in<br />

its business, whichever occurs first<br />

As per RFP<br />

106 Pass<br />

Through<br />

Warranty<br />

Since Wipro is acting as a reseller <strong>of</strong> completed goods, Wipro shall “passthrough”<br />

any warranties and indemnities received from the manufacturer or<br />

licensor <strong>of</strong> such goods and, to the extent, granted by such manufacturer or<br />

licensor, Customer shall be the beneficiary <strong>of</strong> such manufacturer’s or<br />

licensor’s warranties and indemnities with respect to the products. Further, it<br />

is clarified that Wipro shall not provide any additional warranties and<br />

indemnities with respect to the products.<br />

As per RFP<br />

107 Saving<br />

clause<br />

Wipro may terminate this Agreement and/or any work order immediately As per RFP<br />

upon written notice to the other party, in the event the other Party commits<br />

a material breach <strong>of</strong> the Agreement and/or Purchase Order and fails to cure<br />

such default within thirty (30) days after receipt <strong>of</strong> such notice. Customer<br />

shall be responsible <strong>for</strong> payment <strong>of</strong> Services, Equipment and S<strong>of</strong>tware already<br />

provided by Wipro but not yet invoiced. There shall be no charges <strong>for</strong><br />

termination <strong>of</strong> orders or <strong>for</strong> Services not yet provided and Wipro shall not be<br />

held liable <strong>for</strong> the same.<br />

108 Dispute<br />

Resolutio<br />

n<br />

This Agreement shall be governed by laws in <strong>for</strong>ce in India. In the event <strong>of</strong><br />

any dispute arising out <strong>of</strong> this Agreement the same shall be settled by binding<br />

arbitration conducted by a sole arbitrator jointly appointed by both parties<br />

and governed by the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The language <strong>of</strong><br />

the arbitration proceedings shall be English.<br />

As per RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

109 Splitting<br />

<strong>of</strong> order<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

Request <strong>for</strong> addition<br />

We highly recommend that the deal should be splitted between 3 bidders i.e.<br />

L1 / L2 and L3 at the ratio 40% to L1, 30 % to L2 and 30% to L3, who ever<br />

matches the L1 prices. Since the quantity is large, this will be beneficial to<br />

department / Government and vendor. In case L2 bidder does not agrees to<br />

match the price, deal can be splitted between L1 & L3 (in case L3 agrees). In<br />

case L2 and L3 does not agree, L1 alone has to <strong>supply</strong>. Request to consider<br />

this clause.<br />

As per amended RFP<br />

110 End <strong>of</strong><br />

Sale / End<br />

<strong>of</strong> Life<br />

Request <strong>for</strong> addition<br />

Similarly as asked by SI to quote <strong>for</strong> models, which are not EOS and EOL, we<br />

request you to kindly specify in bid that the Processor and Motherboard <strong>for</strong><br />

the supplied items also should not be declared EOS / EOL. Since the model<br />

numbers <strong>of</strong> any machine are governed by these 2 items, this will help in<br />

bringing clarity.<br />

As per RFP<br />

111<br />

112<br />

16<br />

16<br />

STQC /<br />

ETDC /<br />

ERTL<br />

testing<br />

Request <strong>for</strong> clarify Request you to kindly confirm the testing to be undertake by ETDC / STQC /<br />

ERTL? Please clarify in detail to avoid ambiguity<br />

It shall be in accordance with the As per our understanding the said ISO certification is not <strong>for</strong> IT. Request you<br />

Indian Standards - 14896:2001 as to kindly look in to the same and confirm.<br />

amended from time to time and<br />

also with the Technical Specification<br />

as specified in Annexure-2 and be<br />

done by any one<br />

<strong>of</strong> the below mentioned Testing<br />

Agencies<br />

Yes. As per RFP<br />

As per amended RFP<br />

113 Page No<br />

9<br />

Laptop<br />

Sales in<br />

India<br />

Certification <strong>of</strong> IDC / Gartner<br />

Laptop OEM will be in Top 5 IDC/Gartner list in the Calendar Year 2012 / last<br />

four quarter put together<br />

As per RFP<br />

114 Page No<br />

14<br />

B) Payments to the bidder, after<br />

Payment successful completion <strong>of</strong> the target<br />

Terms and milestones<br />

Schedule<br />

Payment should be centralized & from RajCOMP on submission <strong>of</strong> complete<br />

documents asked in RFP<br />

As per RFP.<br />

The payments after completing the<br />

required <strong>for</strong>malities shall be made by<br />

RISL.


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

115 Page No<br />

16, point<br />

d<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

ERTL/ETD<br />

C/STQC<br />

Test<br />

Report<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

The <strong>Bid</strong>ders shall submit Laptop test<br />

report <strong>for</strong> the proposed Laptop<br />

model<br />

We request RajCOMP to allow bidders to submit ERTL/ETDC/STQC test report<br />

obtained in last 5 months . This is to avoid duplication <strong>of</strong> work as<br />

ERTL/ETDC/STQC testing is time consuming and takes almost a month to<br />

complete the entire activity.<br />

As per amended RFP<br />

116 Page No<br />

19<br />

15.Selecti<br />

on<br />

method:<br />

The selection method is Least Cost<br />

Based Selection (LCBS or L1).<br />

Because <strong>of</strong> tight delivery schedule we request RajCOMP to allow bidder to<br />

quote <strong>for</strong> one or two slots .This will help RajCOMP <strong>for</strong> smooth execution &<br />

fast delivery <strong>of</strong> entire One lakh twelve thousand laptops required by<br />

Government <strong>of</strong> <strong>Rajasthan</strong>. To ensure smooth and timely execution the order<br />

may be shared among L1,L2, L3 bidder at 40%,30%,30% ratio respectively.<br />

As per amended RFP<br />

117 Page No<br />

48<br />

Operating<br />

System<br />

Win 7 Flavour <strong>of</strong> Windows7/Windows 8 should be allowed <strong>for</strong> <strong>supply</strong> with <strong>Laptops</strong> As per amended RFP<br />

118 Page No<br />

50<br />

Qualifying<br />

benchmar<br />

k with<br />

score<br />

BAPCO SysMark 2007 overall score<br />

<strong>of</strong> 115 or Higher <strong>for</strong> the supplied<br />

system. The bidder has to provide<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance certificate <strong>of</strong> the<br />

system from ETDC / STQC.<br />

Kindly specify Win 7 / Win 8 <strong>for</strong> testing Report<br />

As per amended RFP<br />

119 Annexur<br />

e-2<br />

120 Annexur<br />

e-2<br />

Technical<br />

Specificati<br />

on<br />

Technical<br />

Specificati<br />

on<br />

Qualifying Benchmark with Score<br />

Graphics Card<br />

We would like to request if BAPCO SysMark 2007 score can be replaced by<br />

other third party benchmark like Passmark (64 Bit) CPU score as AMD ceases<br />

to be a part <strong>of</strong> BAPCO Consortium<br />

AMD would like to emphasize the importance <strong>of</strong> graphics in today's era <strong>of</strong><br />

visual computing and processor must support direct X11 or higher<br />

As per RFP<br />

As per RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

121 57<br />

55<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

Annexure- We agree to all the terms &<br />

9 conditions as mentioned in the<br />

Annexure- bidding document and submit that<br />

7 we have not submitted any<br />

deviations in this regard.<br />

1) HP requests that deviations to the tender terms & conditions be allowed.<br />

Upon down selection <strong>of</strong> vendor, both parties can enter into a definitive and<br />

mutually agreed contract.<br />

As per RFP<br />

Also, I/ we have thoroughly read<br />

the tender/ bidding document and<br />

by signing this certificate, we<br />

hereby submit our token <strong>of</strong><br />

acceptance to all the tender terms<br />

& conditions without any<br />

deviations.<br />

122 10 4 * Testing by STQC / ETDC / ERTL (by<br />

<strong>Bid</strong>der)<br />

* 100% Quality inspection and<br />

testing (Internal by Vendor)<br />

* <strong>Pre</strong>-dispatch Inspection by RSIL - 3<br />

days<br />

* Sample inspection by Third Party<br />

Agency (TPA) - 7 days<br />

* <strong>Pre</strong>loaded educational content -<br />

The s<strong>of</strong>t copy <strong>of</strong> the educational<br />

content shall be provided by RISL /<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Education be<strong>for</strong>e<br />

signing <strong>of</strong> the Agreement.<br />

* Delivery 1,12,000 <strong>Laptops</strong> in 33<br />

Districts in 2 phases<br />

* Post-delivery Inspection - by RISL<br />

with DoIT&C and Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Education<br />

* Warranty - 12 months (including<br />

service center and helpdesk)<br />

1) Will the orders <strong>for</strong> the different lots be released separately or entire<br />

quantity will be released in a single order?<br />

2) Kindly confirm if the Billing will be done to "Govt <strong>of</strong> <strong>Rajasthan</strong>" or to<br />

"RajCOMP Info Services Limited"?<br />

3) The tender specifies three type <strong>of</strong> inspections - a) <strong>Pre</strong>-dispatch inspection<br />

by RSIL, b) <strong>Pre</strong>-dispatch Inspection by Third Party Agency, and c) Post<br />

Dispatch Inspection by RSIL & DOE. Please clarify if all the three inspections<br />

will be applicable to this order.<br />

4) Kindly confirm that the scope <strong>of</strong> vendor will be limited to only delivery and<br />

will not include installation/commissioning.<br />

5) Kindly confirm that the delivery will be done at District Headquarter level<br />

only. Who will be the authority to sign the Delivery Challan at all locations?<br />

6) We assume that signing <strong>of</strong> the "Delivery Challan" (Annexure-14), will<br />

constitute the final acceptance <strong>of</strong> the product. Kindly confirm!<br />

7) The document requirement <strong>for</strong> 95% payments includes the "Post Delivery<br />

Inspection report". Please clarify where and when this inspection will be<br />

done. Who will the the authority to conduct the Inspection? What will be the<br />

report <strong>for</strong>mat? What will be the maximum timelines to complete inspection?<br />

8) Kindly confirm that 'Help Desk' requirement will be <strong>for</strong> Warranty period<br />

only.<br />

9) Also, a Statement <strong>of</strong> Work to be mutually discussed and agreed needs to<br />

be drawn up and executed between the parties which will supersede the RFP.<br />

1. As per amended RFP.<br />

2. Yes billing will be done to RISL<br />

3. Yes . All 3 types <strong>of</strong> inspection shall<br />

be applicable<br />

4. Scope includes installation <strong>of</strong><br />

preloaded S<strong>of</strong>tware including<br />

Operating System, Office Suite,<br />

Antivirus, Education Content given by<br />

RISL/ Department <strong>of</strong> Education and<br />

Other s<strong>of</strong>tware as directed by RISL/<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> education<br />

5. Delivery Location shall be at the 33<br />

District headquarters in the State <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Rajasthan</strong><br />

6. Final acceptance shall be subject to<br />

Delivery <strong>of</strong> laptop, completion <strong>of</strong> post<br />

delivery inspection and submission <strong>of</strong><br />

documents given in Payment terms<br />

and schedule<br />

7. Post Delivery inspection may be<br />

conducted at district headquarter or<br />

at Jaipur.<br />

8.Yes helpdesk shall be <strong>for</strong> warranty<br />

period.<br />

As per amended RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

123 13 4 * Consignee will be concerned<br />

District Education Officer or<br />

Authorized Representative from<br />

DoE, GoR or RISL at District<br />

location. Delivery challan in<br />

customer <strong>for</strong>mat (ANNEXURE-14).<br />

* Details <strong>of</strong> exact location <strong>for</strong><br />

delivery at the District Headquarter<br />

shall be provided by RISL/<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Education, GoR to<br />

the successful bidder be<strong>for</strong>e the<br />

time <strong>of</strong> final delivery.<br />

* Phase - 1 (scheme <strong>for</strong> 2012-13):<br />

- Lot 1: 28000 within 45 Days from<br />

the Date <strong>of</strong> Work Order<br />

- Lot 2: 28000 within 60 Days from<br />

the Date <strong>of</strong> Work Order<br />

* Phase - 1 (scheme <strong>for</strong> 2013-14):<br />

- Lot 3: 36000 within 90 Days from<br />

the Date <strong>of</strong> Work Order<br />

- Lot 4: 20000 within 120 Days from<br />

the Date <strong>of</strong> Work Order<br />

1) Considering the large volume <strong>of</strong> materials involved, we request <strong>for</strong> an<br />

extension <strong>of</strong> delivery period, as mentioned below:<br />

* Phase - 1 (scheme <strong>for</strong> 2012-13):<br />

- Lot 1: 28000 within 75 Days from the Date <strong>of</strong> Work Order acceptance<br />

- Lot 2: 28000 within 105 Days from the Date <strong>of</strong> WO acceptance<br />

* Phase - 1 (scheme <strong>for</strong> 2013-14):<br />

- Lot 3: 36000 within 120 Days from the Date <strong>of</strong> WO acceptance<br />

- Lot 4: 20000 within 150 Days from the Date <strong>of</strong> WO acceptance<br />

2) HP requests that the entire period required <strong>for</strong> pre-dispatch inspections<br />

(7+10 days) should be excluded from Delivery TAT, <strong>for</strong> calculation <strong>of</strong> any LD.<br />

Delivery period will be applicable from date <strong>of</strong> receipt <strong>of</strong> consignee details,<br />

road permit where applicable, and date <strong>of</strong> acceptance <strong>of</strong> Work Order by<br />

Vendor.<br />

5) Customer will need to provide the road permit required <strong>for</strong> delivery <strong>of</strong><br />

materials. If road permit is not provided, customer will need to provide<br />

required declaration and the Entry tax applicable will be charged at actual to<br />

customer on submission <strong>of</strong> pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> payment. Kindly help to give your<br />

acceptance on the same.<br />

As per amended RFP<br />

124 56 Annexure-<br />

8<br />

UNDERTAKING ON AUTHENTICITY<br />

OF COMPUTER EQUIPMENTS<br />

1) Suitable changes to the Undertaking <strong>of</strong> Authenticity is requested to be<br />

made at the time <strong>of</strong> bid submission<br />

As per RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

125 11 Chapter 4 * 12 Months from the date <strong>of</strong><br />

acceptance <strong>of</strong> the delivery<br />

* Comprehensive and Carrying<br />

warranty including battery and<br />

adaptor.<br />

* SLA: T+7 - no penalty; > T+7 - Rs<br />

100/- per day; > T+90 - Remedial<br />

action by RSIL.<br />

* Applicable penalties shall be<br />

calculated on Quarterly basis. The<br />

total Penalty in each phase shall not<br />

exceed 5% <strong>of</strong> the total value <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Order. Default beyond 5% will be<br />

deemed to be an event <strong>for</strong><br />

termination on default.<br />

* Warranty on supplied s<strong>of</strong>tware<br />

media should be atleast 90 days.<br />

* Service centre in 33 Districts <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Rajasthan</strong> - run by <strong>Bid</strong>der /<br />

Franchise / authorized distributors /<br />

dealers / authorized local partner <strong>of</strong><br />

bidder OR undertaking to establish<br />

in all 33 Districts within 30 days<br />

from Date <strong>of</strong> Work Order and<br />

be<strong>for</strong>e signing <strong>of</strong> Agreement.<br />

Details to be provided as per<br />

ANNEXURE-13.<br />

* Helpdesk - to facilitate and<br />

monitor warranty services provided<br />

by the service centres. 2 seater help<br />

desk with toll free number at RSIL<br />

1) We also request you to remove the mandatory requirement <strong>of</strong> a service<br />

center in each District, which will have a significant impact on the cost <strong>of</strong> the<br />

project. HP will ensure to meet the required SLA, through its existing service<br />

setup in the state <strong>of</strong> <strong>Rajasthan</strong>.<br />

2) Warranty shall start from date <strong>of</strong> installation, or 1 month from the date <strong>of</strong><br />

delivery, whichever is earlier.<br />

3) The Warranty will be <strong>for</strong> hardware. For all s<strong>of</strong>tware only L1 diagnosis will<br />

be done by Vendor. HP provides third-party products, s<strong>of</strong>tware, and services<br />

that are not HP Branded “AS IS” without warranties <strong>of</strong> any kind, although the<br />

original manufacturers or third party suppliers <strong>of</strong> such products, s<strong>of</strong>tware and<br />

services may provide their own warranties. Eg. S<strong>of</strong>tware from Micros<strong>of</strong>t etc<br />

will be supported during warranty as per Micros<strong>of</strong>t warranty.<br />

1. As per amended RFP<br />

2. As per RFP<br />

3. As per RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

126 36 26, d Delivery Default:<br />

Penalty as % <strong>of</strong> value <strong>of</strong> goods and/<br />

or service which supplier has failed<br />

to <strong>supply</strong>:<br />

* Delay up to 1/4th <strong>of</strong> period <strong>of</strong><br />

delivery, completion <strong>of</strong> work - 2.5%<br />

* Delay exceeding 1/4th but not<br />

exceeding 1/2lf - 5%<br />

* Delay exceeding 1/2lf but not<br />

exceeding 3/4th - 7.5%<br />

* Delay exceeding 3/4th - 10%<br />

The maximum amount <strong>of</strong> liquidated<br />

damages shall be 10% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

desired Lot. The percentage refers<br />

to the payment due <strong>for</strong> the<br />

associated milestone/lot.<br />

Warranty Default:<br />

* SLA: T+7 - no penalty; > T+7 - Rs<br />

100/- per day; > T+90 - Remedial<br />

action by RSIL.<br />

* Applicable penalties shall be<br />

calculated on Quarterly basis. The<br />

total Penalty in each phase shall not<br />

exceed 5% <strong>of</strong> the total value <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Order. Default beyond 5% will be<br />

deemed to be an event <strong>for</strong><br />

termination on default.<br />

1) Kindly confirm that the aggregate Penalty <strong>for</strong> default in Warranty terms,<br />

during the complete Warranty period, shall not exceed 5% <strong>of</strong> the total value<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Order.<br />

As per amended RFP<br />

127 18 10 * Rs. 4.92 Crore - Bankers<br />

Chq/DD/BG <strong>of</strong> Scheduled<br />

Commercial Bank, valid <strong>for</strong> <strong>Bid</strong><br />

Validity.<br />

* The EMD taken from the bidder<br />

shall be <strong>for</strong>feited in the following<br />

cases:- To adjust any dues against<br />

the firm from any other contract<br />

with RISL.<br />

1) Kindly confirm that Bank Guarantee from a scheduled bank will be<br />

acceptable. Also as per the RBI's norms, Bank may make suitable changes to<br />

the <strong>for</strong>mat <strong>of</strong> the Per<strong>for</strong>mance Bank Guarantee.<br />

As per amended RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

128 31 15 * 20% <strong>of</strong> order value in <strong>for</strong>m <strong>of</strong> BG<br />

* Within 15 days <strong>of</strong> notification <strong>of</strong><br />

contract award<br />

* Refund after 3 months <strong>of</strong> the<br />

successful completion <strong>of</strong> the<br />

contract period i.e. 01 months after<br />

expiry <strong>of</strong> “Warranty and Support<br />

Services” <strong>of</strong> all the <strong>Laptops</strong>.<br />

1) Please specify the validity period (months) <strong>for</strong> the PSD.<br />

2) Also as per the RBI's norms, Bank may make suitable changes to the <strong>for</strong>mat<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Per<strong>for</strong>mance Bank Guarantee.<br />

1. As per amended RFP<br />

2. <strong>Bid</strong>ders shall submit PBG as per<br />

the Template provided in Annexure -<br />

11 <strong>of</strong> the RFP Document<br />

129 41 35 Milestone:<br />

1) We understand that the bill submission to RISL and payment release will be<br />

* Complete Lot-1/2/3/4 <strong>of</strong> <strong>Laptops</strong> - done from a single centralized location. Kindly confirm the details where the<br />

95% (Docs - Inv, Post-DI Report,<br />

Delivery Challan)<br />

* Quarterly Helpdesk Reports -<br />

0.6% + Actual cost <strong>for</strong> Helpdesk<br />

* Final Quarter Helpdesk Report -<br />

Balance <strong>of</strong> PO + Actual cost <strong>for</strong><br />

Helpdesk<br />

Period:<br />

bills need to be submitted and payment will be released.<br />

2) HP requests <strong>for</strong> release <strong>of</strong> balance 5% payment, against submission <strong>of</strong><br />

Per<strong>for</strong>mance Bank Guarantee <strong>of</strong> 5% by the Vendor, valid till Warranty period.<br />

3) Kindly confirm that the vendor can raise bills and receive payments<br />

partially. Can vendor submit bills <strong>for</strong> locations where obligation is complete?<br />

4) For SNR (site not ready) cases, we request <strong>for</strong> release <strong>of</strong> 95% payments,<br />

against bidders undertaking to complete the installation when the site is<br />

ready. Balance 5% can be released against submission <strong>of</strong> Per<strong>for</strong>mance Bank<br />

* Payment period - Within sixty (60) Guarantee <strong>of</strong> 5% by the Vendor, valid till completion <strong>of</strong> Warranty period.<br />

days after submission and<br />

acceptance <strong>of</strong> an invoice.<br />

5) We propose that Bank will pay all invoiced amounts within thirty (30) days<br />

<strong>of</strong> HP's invoice date.<br />

As per RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

130 24 30 * At the time the Contract is<br />

awarded, the quantity <strong>of</strong> Goods and<br />

Related Services originally specified<br />

in the bidding document may be<br />

increased or decreased but without<br />

any change in the unit prices or<br />

other terms and conditions <strong>of</strong> the<br />

bid and the bidding document.<br />

* If the work order is placed up to<br />

100% in excess <strong>of</strong> the quantities<br />

mentioned in the bidding<br />

document, the bidder shall be<br />

bound to meet the required <strong>supply</strong>.<br />

* If the tendering authority does<br />

not purchase any <strong>of</strong> the tendered<br />

articles or purchases less than the<br />

quantity indicated in the bidding<br />

document, the bidder shall not be<br />

entitled to claim any compensation.<br />

1) HP proposes to limit any quantity variation to 15% to 20%, <strong>of</strong> the quantity<br />

specified in RFP. Any increase <strong>of</strong> decrease greater than 15% to 20%, will need<br />

to be discussed and agreed with vendor.<br />

As per RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

131 30 13 Recovery <strong>of</strong> liquidated damages,<br />

short <strong>supply</strong>, breakage, rejected<br />

articles shall be made ordinarily<br />

from bills. The Purchase Officer<br />

shall withhold amount to the extent<br />

<strong>of</strong> short <strong>supply</strong>, broken/ damaged<br />

or <strong>for</strong> rejected articles unless these<br />

are replaced satisfactorily. In case<br />

<strong>of</strong> failure to withhold the amount, it<br />

shall be recovered from his dues<br />

and per<strong>for</strong>mance security deposit<br />

available with RISL. The balance, if<br />

any, shall be demanded from the<br />

Supplier/ Selected <strong>Bid</strong>der and when<br />

recovery is not possible, the<br />

Purchase Officer shall take recourse<br />

to law in <strong>for</strong>ce.<br />

1) HP proposes <strong>for</strong> customer to claim any penalty amount separately and HP<br />

will pay any due amount separately. This is proposed in view <strong>of</strong> the<br />

accounting complicacy resulting from any deduction <strong>of</strong> due invoices.<br />

As per RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

132 29<br />

47<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

8, c<br />

Annexure-<br />

1<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

* The bidder shall not quote and<br />

<strong>supply</strong> any hardware/ s<strong>of</strong>tware that<br />

is likely to be declared as End <strong>of</strong><br />

Sale <strong>for</strong> twelve months and End <strong>of</strong><br />

Service/ Support <strong>for</strong> twenty four<br />

months from the date <strong>of</strong> bid<br />

submission. If any <strong>of</strong> the hardware/<br />

s<strong>of</strong>tware is found to be declared as<br />

End <strong>of</strong> Sale/ Service/ Support in the<br />

period mentioned above, then the<br />

bidder shall replace all such<br />

hardware/ s<strong>of</strong>tware with the latest<br />

ones having equivalent or higher<br />

specifications without any financial<br />

obligation to the purchaser.<br />

* Period <strong>of</strong> back to back support,<br />

updates and patches - 12 months.<br />

* Period <strong>of</strong> end <strong>of</strong> sale - 12 months.<br />

* Period <strong>of</strong> end <strong>of</strong> service - 24<br />

months.<br />

1) As IT industry is very dynamic, there may be possibility <strong>of</strong> roll over models<br />

within 12 months. In cases <strong>of</strong> any such roll overs, vendor will make this<br />

available at no additional cost. Request to kindly remove the requirement <strong>of</strong><br />

"replacement" <strong>for</strong> any such product roll overs.<br />

As per RFP<br />

133 30 9, d Shifting the place <strong>of</strong> delivery<br />

destination: RISL/Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Education shall be free to shift the<br />

place <strong>of</strong> delivery within the same<br />

district. The successful/ selected<br />

bidder shall provide all assistance<br />

including transportation in shifting<br />

<strong>of</strong> the delivered Items.<br />

1) We can support <strong>for</strong> any reinstallation, but the cost <strong>of</strong> shifting, freight and<br />

transit documents will be responsibility <strong>of</strong> the customer.<br />

No.<br />

As per RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

134 17 8, b * While tabulating the bids <strong>of</strong> those<br />

firms which are not entitled to price<br />

preference, the element <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Rajasthan</strong> VAT shall be excluded<br />

from the rates quoted by the firms<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Rajasthan</strong> and the element <strong>of</strong><br />

Central VAT shall be included in the<br />

rates <strong>of</strong> firms outside <strong>Rajasthan</strong>. In<br />

such case, if the price <strong>of</strong> any<br />

commodity being <strong>of</strong>fered <strong>for</strong> sale<br />

by firms in <strong>Rajasthan</strong> is the same or<br />

lower (excluding element <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Rajasthan</strong> Sales Tax) than the price<br />

<strong>of</strong> firm outside <strong>Rajasthan</strong> (including<br />

element <strong>of</strong> Central Sales Tax), the<br />

commodity shall be purchased from<br />

the firm in <strong>Rajasthan</strong>.<br />

1) Please help to explain the reason (benefit to customer) <strong>of</strong> different tax<br />

treatment <strong>for</strong> local billing and billing from outside <strong>Rajasthan</strong>.<br />

As per State Policy / law<br />

As per RFP<br />

135 17<br />

30<br />

136 18<br />

31<br />

8, b<br />

14<br />

10<br />

15<br />

Taxes & Duties<br />

Forfeiture terms <strong>of</strong> EMD/PBG also<br />

includes: To adjust any dues against<br />

the firm from any other contract<br />

with RISL.<br />

1) Request your confirmation on below assumptions:<br />

- Taxes (VAT/CST/Service Tax) and Govt levies will be exclusive and to<br />

customers account.<br />

- Taxes and Govt levies will be at actual. Any changes in taxes/got levies will<br />

be to account <strong>of</strong> Customer.<br />

- Any road permit required <strong>for</strong> delivery will be provided by customer.<br />

Alternatively customer will provide the required declaration and the Entry tax<br />

applicable will be charged at actual to customer on submission <strong>of</strong> pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

payment.<br />

1) We request that the adjustment <strong>of</strong> the EMD or PBG is limited to any dues<br />

<strong>of</strong> this contract only.<br />

As per RFP<br />

Regarding road permit and entry tax,<br />

please read the clause "Purchaser’s<br />

Responsibilities" and "Taxes &<br />

Duties" <strong>of</strong> Chapter 6 carefully<br />

As per RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

137 29 8 Unless otherwise stipulated in the<br />

Contract, the scope <strong>of</strong> <strong>supply</strong> shall<br />

include all such items not<br />

specifically mentioned in the<br />

Contract but that can be reasonably<br />

inferred from the Contract as being<br />

required <strong>for</strong> attaining delivery and<br />

completion <strong>of</strong> the goods and<br />

related services as if such items<br />

were expressly mentioned in the<br />

Contract.<br />

1) Scope to be limited to items quoted by Vendor, as per RFP requirement. As per RFP<br />

138 32 18 The bidder shall not assign or sublet<br />

his contract or any substantial<br />

part there<strong>of</strong> to any other agency<br />

without the permission <strong>of</strong><br />

Purchaser/ Tendering Authority,<br />

except <strong>for</strong> the following:<br />

· Setting-up a helpdesk<br />

· Establishment <strong>of</strong> Service Support<br />

Centres<br />

· Transportation <strong>of</strong> the Items<br />

mentioned in the annexure-1 to the<br />

destinations<br />

1) The <strong>Bid</strong>der will have the right to use subcontractors (also referred to as<br />

`<strong>Bid</strong>der's - authorized service providers` herein) to deliver products / provide<br />

services described in this Agreement. Notwithstanding the <strong>for</strong>egoing, the use<br />

<strong>of</strong> the subcontractors will not release HP from per<strong>for</strong>ming its obligations<br />

under this Agreement.<br />

As per RFP<br />

139 NA NA New Query 1) Kindly confirm if the OEM, can authorize its partner in <strong>Rajasthan</strong> <strong>for</strong> the<br />

purpose <strong>of</strong> execution <strong>of</strong> orders. The OEM will do the biding, negotiation and<br />

conclude the contract with customer directly. However, OEM will authorize<br />

its local partner to carry out all commercial activities with Customer - Order<br />

release, Billing, Payment collection etc. OEM will remain responsible to the<br />

customer directly <strong>for</strong> its obligations under the agreement.<br />

As per amended RFP<br />

140 38 29 The aggregate liability <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Supplier shall not exceed the<br />

amount specified in the Contract<br />

HP requests that the aggregate liability <strong>of</strong> Supplier shall be limited to<br />

purchase order value.<br />

As per RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

141 40 34 The existing clause provides <strong>for</strong> a<br />

Committee within the Customer's<br />

organization to decide on the<br />

dispute that arises between the<br />

parties.<br />

HP requests that after exhausting the option <strong>of</strong> settlement <strong>of</strong> disputes be<strong>for</strong>e<br />

the standing committee, it requests <strong>for</strong> an appointment <strong>of</strong> a Sole Arbitrator<br />

to decide the same. In this regard, it proposes the following:- In the event <strong>of</strong><br />

any dispute or differences arising under these conditions or any special<br />

conditions <strong>of</strong> the contract in connection with this contract, or the<br />

construction, meaning, scope or operation or effect there<strong>of</strong>, or the rights,<br />

duties or liabilities or the validity <strong>of</strong> the breach there<strong>of</strong>, such dispute shall be<br />

referred to a sole arbitrator appointed by mutual consent <strong>of</strong> the both the<br />

parties and in the event <strong>of</strong> disagreement between the 2 parties, the<br />

appointment <strong>of</strong> the Arbitrator shall be made in accordance with the<br />

Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.<br />

As per RFP<br />

142 49 Annexure - DVD Writer ( 16X or higher) Standard speed is 8X or higher , request you to pls amend the same As per amended RFP<br />

2<br />

143 49 Annexure - Office Suite<br />

HP requests that Acrobat Pr<strong>of</strong>essional XI shall also be pre-installed in the As per amended RFP<br />

2<br />

laptop to allow the Students to collaborate with Teachers and create<br />

documents in PDF <strong>for</strong>mat, copy textual data from other PDF documents etc.<br />

144 16 STQC testing report validity is <strong>for</strong> 2<br />

months<br />

STQC testing Report validity to be relaxed from 2 months to 4 months<br />

As per amended RFP<br />

145<br />

48 and<br />

50<br />

ANNEXUR<br />

E-2:<br />

TECHNICA<br />

L<br />

SPECIFICA<br />

TIONS<br />

Processor (Minimum): Latest<br />

generation X86, Dual Core (Intel<br />

Pentium / AMD Processor with<br />

processor Speed <strong>of</strong> 2.0 GHZ or<br />

higher with 2MB cache) .<br />

Qualifying benchmark<br />

with Score: BAPCO SysMark 2007<br />

overall score<br />

<strong>of</strong> 115 or Higher <strong>for</strong> the supplied<br />

system. The bidder has to provide<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance certificate <strong>of</strong> the<br />

system from ETDC / STQC.<br />

BAPCO SYSMark2007 overall score <strong>of</strong> 115 is not the correct per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

score <strong>for</strong> latest generation Intel Pentium processor (at 2.0 GHz/2MB ) based<br />

laptops. This score is so low that it is met by other Intel Dual Core Processors.<br />

Any <strong>of</strong> below Options can be chosen by deptt. to match the processor<br />

specifications with qualifying benchmark score:<br />

a. For latest Pentium based laptop, the desired score with qualifying<br />

benchmark BAPCO SYSmark2007 overall needs to be 140 or higher<br />

OR<br />

b. Processor specifications should be changed to: "Latest Generation, x86,<br />

Dual Core Processor". Since the specifications have already asked <strong>for</strong><br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance ratings <strong>of</strong> 115, it will enable the bidders to select the optimal<br />

plat<strong>for</strong>m meeting the requirement.<br />

OR<br />

c. Latest Generation x86, Dual Core (Intel Pentium 2.0GHz / 2MB processor or<br />

equivalent AMD A6 processor as certified by STQC per<strong>for</strong>mance test report.<br />

As per RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

146<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

In the event <strong>of</strong> you considering processor Brand & model number approach<br />

below are the options:<br />

As per RFP<br />

48<br />

ANNEXUR<br />

E-2:<br />

TECHNICA<br />

L<br />

SPECIFICA<br />

TIONS<br />

Processor (Minimum): Latest<br />

generation X86, Dual Core (Intel<br />

Pentium / AMD Processor with<br />

processor Speed <strong>of</strong> 2.0 GHZ or<br />

higher with 2MB cache)<br />

AMD Dual core A4-3320M Processor OR Intel Dual Core B840 or higher.<br />

OR<br />

Intel Pentium B950 or AMD A6-4400M Processor or higher (where both are<br />

Dual Core Processors).<br />

OR<br />

Latest generation X86, Dual Core (Intel Pentium / AMD A6 Processor with<br />

processor Speed <strong>of</strong> 2.0 GHZ or higher)<br />

147<br />

48<br />

ANNEXUR<br />

E-2:<br />

TECHNICA<br />

L<br />

SPECIFICA<br />

TIONS<br />

Processor (Minimum): Latest<br />

generation X86, Dual Core (Intel<br />

Pentium / AMD Processor with<br />

processor Speed <strong>of</strong> 2.0 GHZ or<br />

higher with 2MB cache)<br />

Since none <strong>of</strong> the clause mentioned in the RFP gives the state got<br />

protection against obsolete products,<br />

<strong>Pre</strong>sent specifications can be qualified by laptop based on even processor<br />

released in 2009.<br />

we suggest to add below in the CPU specifications:<br />

“Processor should not be launched be<strong>for</strong>e year 2012 “<br />

List <strong>of</strong> Old & New Intel Pentium & AMD processors which qualifies the<br />

present specification” enclosed as appendix A<br />

As per RFP<br />

148<br />

As per amended RFP<br />

1<br />

Annexure<br />

II-<br />

Technical<br />

Specificati<br />

ons (OS)<br />

MS Windows 2007 Home Basic or<br />

Windows 8<br />

Request to modify the same to - Micros<strong>of</strong>t Windows 7 Home Basic or<br />

Windows 8<br />

149<br />

2<br />

Annexure<br />

II-<br />

Technical<br />

Specificati<br />

ons<br />

(Antivirus)<br />

MS Security Essentials covers under<br />

MS PIL scheme which exist with<br />

GoR and MS MoU<br />

Request to modify the “MS Security Essentials” with “Micros<strong>of</strong>t Security<br />

Essentials/ Windows Defender”.<br />

As per RFP<br />

150 Legibility<br />

Criteria<br />

151 9<br />

Legibility<br />

Criteria<br />

The <strong>Bid</strong>der shall be an OEM and<br />

Registered in India on or be<strong>for</strong>e 1st<br />

April 2008<br />

Please allow consortium partner<br />

A Laptop OEM or his one authorized Partner are eligible to participate in the<br />

Tender who is registered in India on or be<strong>for</strong>e 1st April 2008.<br />

As per amended RFP<br />

As per amended RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

152 41 35.<br />

Payment<br />

Terms and<br />

Schedule<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

Payment Terms and Schedule<br />

Lenovo requests RajCOMP to kindly elaborate the payment terms as it is not<br />

Transparent in the RFP<br />

As per RFP<br />

153 New Proposed Clause <strong>for</strong> Tax<br />

Change<br />

The basic rates shall REMAIN FIRM during the tenure <strong>of</strong> the contract / As per RFP<br />

extended period <strong>of</strong> contract and NO ESCALATIONS, whatsoever shall either be<br />

claimed or considered. However In case any national or state statute or any<br />

local law or regulation or by-law <strong>of</strong> any duly constituted authority is changed<br />

or comes into <strong>for</strong>ce which results in extra costs/tax in relation to the<br />

provision <strong>of</strong> the goods/ Services, the consequential effect shall be to the<br />

account <strong>of</strong> the Purchaser and the same shall be borne by the Purchaser<br />

154 22 24 Negotiations We also propose to put clause <strong>of</strong> dividing the total quantities between<br />

L1:L2:L3 at 40:30:30 Incase L2 and L3 Matches the L1 Commercials Also<br />

incase L2 and L3 doesn’t match the commercials <strong>of</strong> L1 This has to be Re-<br />

Tendered. Below are some key Advantage to Government and Department<br />

Incase the Splitting is agreed:-<br />

Incase the entire Quantity is awarded to L1 and considering the execution<br />

timelines is 120 Days but Incase this Quantity gets splitted in L1:L2:L3 then<br />

the entire project will be executed in much less time as mentioned the RFP.<br />

Incase the entire Quantity is awarded to L1 and L1 delays the delivery<br />

timeline because <strong>of</strong> any reason then Government's <strong>Pre</strong>stigious project is<br />

impacted badly and Incase this is divided in L1:L2:L3 there is high probability<br />

that out <strong>of</strong> 3 <strong>Bid</strong>ders if 2 has completed the execution then the Project is 70%<br />

Completely executed.<br />

Increases participation thus will Increase Healthy competition and best<br />

competitive commercials will be <strong>of</strong>fered to the Government/Department<br />

Also Please note that Central Government/state governments and State<br />

Nodal Agencies Like ELCOT/UPLC/MPSEDC/AMTRON has implemented the<br />

same clause and are highly benefitted<br />

As per amended RFP<br />

155 16 D ERTL/STQC/ETDC Test Reports Please elaborate the parameters <strong>of</strong> the Testing to be done through<br />

ERTL/STQC/ETDC<br />

Laptop Test Report shall include the<br />

test results <strong>for</strong> Per<strong>for</strong>mance Testing<br />

in complaince to the Technical<br />

Specifications and as per SYSmark<br />

rating mentioned in the RFP<br />

document


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

156 16 D The submitted Laptop Test Report<br />

shall not be dated more than two<br />

months prior to the last date <strong>of</strong><br />

submission <strong>of</strong> <strong>Bid</strong>s.<br />

Request to please amend the same as :-The submitted Laptop Test Report<br />

shall not be dated more than Six months prior to the last date <strong>of</strong> submission<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Bid</strong>s.<br />

As per RFP<br />

157 36 26 LD b) Liquidated damages: Delay up to one fourth period <strong>of</strong> the prescribed<br />

delivery period, successful installation & completion <strong>of</strong> work: 2.5 % <strong>of</strong> the<br />

value <strong>of</strong> undelivered Goods/ uninstalled work/ delayed services. Delay<br />

exceeding one fourth but not exceeding half <strong>of</strong> the prescribed delivery<br />

period, successful installation & completion <strong>of</strong> work: 5.0 % <strong>of</strong> the value <strong>of</strong><br />

undelivered Goods/ uninstalled work/ delayed services. Delay exceeding half<br />

but not exceeding three fourth <strong>of</strong> the prescribed delivery period, successful<br />

installation & completion <strong>of</strong> work: 7.5 % <strong>of</strong> the value <strong>of</strong> undelivered Goods/<br />

uninstalled work/ delayed services. Delay exceeding three fourth <strong>of</strong> the<br />

prescribed delivery period, successful installation & completion <strong>of</strong> work: 10.0<br />

% <strong>of</strong> the value <strong>of</strong> undelivered Goods/ uninstalled work/ delayed services.<br />

Kindly amend the LD item wise <strong>for</strong> the items only not delivered in time<br />

As per RFP<br />

158 17 9 Validity <strong>of</strong> <strong>Bid</strong>: 120 days Kindly amend the validity <strong>of</strong> <strong>Bid</strong>s to at least 90 days. As per RFP<br />

159 New Proposed Clause: ERV Clause<br />

(Exchange Rate variation)<br />

160 48 ANNEXUR<br />

E-2:<br />

TECHNICA<br />

L<br />

SPECIFICA<br />

TIONS<br />

Optical Drive : DVD R/W (16X<br />

higher)<br />

We request you to please add Exchange Rate variation Clause or please make<br />

it a international bid where we can quote in Dollar & payment will also be<br />

made in dollar. NISCI has recently released an RFP which has ERV Clause and<br />

slowly Government Department has understood <strong>of</strong> having the same clause in<br />

the RFP<br />

This is a non standard item <strong>for</strong> Laptop as generally 8x DVD Writer comes with<br />

Laptop. Kindly amend the same.<br />

As per RFP<br />

As per amended RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

161 48 ANNEXUR<br />

E-2:<br />

TECHNICA<br />

L<br />

SPECIFICA<br />

TIONS<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

OS: MS Windows 2007 Home Basic<br />

or Windows 8, whichever is latest<br />

launched and available in India at<br />

the time <strong>of</strong> delivery (National<br />

Academic) on Shape the Future SKU<br />

<strong>of</strong>fered by Micros<strong>of</strong>t to<br />

Government <strong>of</strong> <strong>Rajasthan</strong> under<br />

MoU<br />

Please amend the OS as MS Win 7 Home Basic. Secondly please specify exact<br />

version <strong>of</strong> the OS as per the MOU signed between MS & Govt. <strong>of</strong> <strong>Rajasthan</strong><br />

As per amended RFP<br />

162 47 Annexure-<br />

1<br />

Period <strong>of</strong> end <strong>of</strong> sale (in months) &<br />

Period <strong>of</strong> end <strong>of</strong> service & Period <strong>of</strong><br />

back to back support, updates and<br />

patches (in months)<br />

We appreciate this clause and would request you to specifically ask <strong>for</strong><br />

Manufacturer Authorization Form (MAF) from the supplier <strong>of</strong> critical<br />

components such as CPU, Mother board, Operating System, Office and<br />

antivirus application. This MAF would be submitted by all bidders.<br />

As per RFP<br />

163 Operating System (Latest) Please note that Windows 8 operating system is now available but the<br />

statement mentioned can lead to the confusion at a later stage and<br />

department may not be getting the maximum value, hence and would<br />

request department to be specific on the same.<br />

As per amended RFP<br />

164 14 24d Negotiations In our opinion, this clause is not as per industry practices and can put a<br />

question mark on whole tender process. Kindly reconsider your position on<br />

the same and delete the option <strong>of</strong> giving "written counter <strong>of</strong>fer" to lowest<br />

and /or other bidders.<br />

As per RFP<br />

165 14 24d Best Value <strong>Bid</strong>der Please provide the definition <strong>of</strong> "best value bidder". As per RFP<br />

166 16 30 b Changes <strong>of</strong> <strong>Bid</strong> Quantity- If the<br />

work order is placed up to 100% in<br />

excess <strong>of</strong> the quantities mentioned<br />

in the bidding document, the bidder<br />

shall be bound to meet the required<br />

<strong>supply</strong><br />

<strong>Bid</strong>der should be assigned single PO <strong>for</strong> the Final quantity with decreased or<br />

Increased <strong>of</strong> <strong>Bid</strong> quantity. An additional PO <strong>for</strong> additional quantity shall be<br />

supplied subject to prevailing price quoted by the bidder.<br />

As per RFP<br />

167 17 26 d If the issuance <strong>of</strong> <strong>for</strong>mal Work<br />

Order is likely to take time, a Letter<br />

<strong>of</strong> Intent (LOI) may be sent<br />

Pursuant to this clause, please specify the delivery date<br />

As per RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

168 18 48 Related to bid estimated price We understand from your bid document that department have provisioned a<br />

budget <strong>of</strong> INR 246.00 Crores <strong>for</strong> 112000 numbers <strong>of</strong> laptops. Based on this<br />

fact, per unit price stands at INR 21964.00 including all taxes exactly. Further,<br />

we have understood from today's pre-bid meeting that Micros<strong>of</strong>t component<br />

would be costing INR 2200.00 minimum, taking bare hardware price to INR<br />

19764.00 and this seems to be out <strong>of</strong> sync. with market conditions. We<br />

hereby propose department to buy MS component separately directly from<br />

MS and to provide the same to<br />

As per RFP<br />

169 61 Annexure<br />

12<br />

COMPONENTS OFFERED – BoM Please elaborate what is expected out <strong>of</strong> this Annexure-12 from us. Detail as required in the Annexure<br />

indicating make and mode <strong>of</strong> the<br />

laptop and reference and page<br />

number in the datasheet <strong>for</strong><br />

complying to technical specifications.<br />

170 Additional Points Companies or his subsidiaries who are providing any kind <strong>of</strong> consultancy to<br />

Government/Department on this project may not be allowed to participate<br />

either Directly or Indirectly<br />

As per RFP

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!