06.12.2012 Views

Association for Education and Rehabilitation of the ... - AER Online

Association for Education and Rehabilitation of the ... - AER Online

Association for Education and Rehabilitation of the ... - AER Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Teacher Self-Efficacy <strong>and</strong> Deaf-Blindness<br />

attitudes toward children with deaf-blindness. These<br />

factors appeared to mediate teachers’ sense <strong>of</strong><br />

efficacy. In addition, <strong>the</strong> data showed that teachers,<br />

in <strong>the</strong> absence <strong>of</strong> education <strong>and</strong> experiences<br />

teaching a diverse <strong>and</strong> challenging group <strong>of</strong><br />

students, need specific supports that are varied<br />

<strong>and</strong> particular to <strong>the</strong>ir situations.<br />

Limitations<br />

There were many limitations to this investigation<br />

<strong>of</strong> teacher SE in deaf-blindness. For one, this was a<br />

pilot study <strong>and</strong>, as such, marks <strong>the</strong> first attempt at<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>the</strong> construct <strong>of</strong> SE as it relates to<br />

teaching children with deaf-blindness. In addition,<br />

<strong>the</strong> composition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> group <strong>of</strong> 13 teachers chosen<br />

<strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> study may have contributed to <strong>the</strong>mes that<br />

emerged <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> stated findings. The purposeful<br />

sampling technique used in <strong>the</strong> selection <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

teachers yielded rich data <strong>for</strong> analysis, but it is not<br />

possible to know how <strong>the</strong>se teachers compare or<br />

contrast to o<strong>the</strong>rs that support learners with deafblindness.<br />

Despite <strong>the</strong>se limitations, this study<br />

identified <strong>the</strong>mes that are useful <strong>for</strong> our underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> concept <strong>of</strong> teacher SE <strong>and</strong> provides<br />

a foundation <strong>for</strong> future research on teacher efficacy<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> contextual factors that may mediate it.<br />

Future research could replicate this study using a<br />

different group <strong>of</strong> teachers with varying backgrounds.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Teachers who support children with deafblindness<br />

are a useful population <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> study <strong>of</strong><br />

SE given <strong>the</strong> unique challenges <strong>the</strong>y face in<br />

educating a low-incidence population <strong>of</strong> learners<br />

with unique <strong>and</strong> specialized needs. Perhaps <strong>the</strong><br />

fact that <strong>the</strong>re are so few children with deafblindness<br />

<strong>and</strong> so few teachers trained to teach<br />

<strong>the</strong>se children is one reason why researchers <strong>of</strong> SE<br />

can study factors that mediate varying levels <strong>of</strong><br />

teacher efficacy <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> contextual factors that<br />

affect <strong>the</strong>se levels. Teachers supporting children<br />

with deaf-blindness must go beyond <strong>the</strong> resources<br />

<strong>the</strong>y currently have, including <strong>the</strong>ir education,<br />

training, <strong>and</strong> past teaching experiences, <strong>and</strong> take<br />

a problem-solving approach to instructing <strong>the</strong>se<br />

children. A highly individualized <strong>and</strong> collaborative<br />

approach to support children with deaf-blindness is<br />

warranted.<br />

The <strong>the</strong>oretical implications <strong>of</strong> this study were<br />

limited, but analyses revealed that factors within<br />

teachers’ environments <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir own experiences<br />

affect <strong>the</strong>ir sense <strong>of</strong> efficacy, which is consistent with<br />

<strong>the</strong> model <strong>of</strong> teacher efficacy presented by<br />

Tschannen-Moran et al. (1998). Future research<br />

could investigate how teachers <strong>for</strong>mulate <strong>and</strong> sustain<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir efficacy beliefs across a career (Tschannen-<br />

Moran & Woolfolk Hoy, 2002) or how teachers’<br />

efficacy beliefs vary when supporting certain<br />

subgroups <strong>of</strong> children with deaf-blindness (e.g.,<br />

infants/toddlers or children with CHARGE syndrome).<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>r research on teacher SE beliefs in a variety <strong>of</strong><br />

contexts <strong>and</strong> with a variety <strong>of</strong> students, such as<br />

children with deaf-blindness, may contribute to this<br />

growing corpus <strong>of</strong> work.<br />

Practical Implications<br />

The findings <strong>of</strong> this study may have practical<br />

implications <strong>for</strong> those interested in teacher education,<br />

on a preservice <strong>and</strong> in-service level, in special<br />

education. The issues <strong>and</strong> factors that <strong>the</strong> teachers<br />

discussed in <strong>the</strong>ir interviews appear to affect <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

judgments <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir abilities to teach. Perhaps future<br />

research could study if teachers’ SE is affected by<br />

providing educators resources <strong>and</strong> supports to<br />

effectively teach <strong>the</strong>se children. For example, does<br />

teachers’ SE change when administrators give extra<br />

release time or decrease <strong>the</strong> caseloads <strong>of</strong> individual<br />

education plan (IEP) team members <strong>of</strong> children with<br />

deaf-blindness? What happens to teachers’ SE to<br />

support children with deaf-blindness if <strong>the</strong>y meet more<br />

frequently to collectively solve issues <strong>and</strong> support<br />

each o<strong>the</strong>r? When outside agencies with specific<br />

expertise in deaf-blindness support IEP teams <strong>of</strong><br />

children with deaf-blindness <strong>and</strong> provide <strong>the</strong>m with <strong>the</strong><br />

on-<strong>the</strong>-job support <strong>the</strong>y need, does it affect <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

judgments <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir capacities?<br />

Acknowledgments<br />

This study was funded by <strong>the</strong> Spencer Foundation<br />

<strong>and</strong> presented at <strong>the</strong> annual meeting <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> American<br />

Psychological <strong>Association</strong> in San Francisco, CA,<br />

August 2007.<br />

References<br />

96 | <strong>AER</strong> Journal: Research <strong>and</strong> Practice in Visual Impairment <strong>and</strong> Blindness<br />

Ashton, P. (1984). A motivational paradigm <strong>for</strong> effective<br />

teacher education. Journal <strong>of</strong> Teacher <strong>Education</strong>, 5, 28–32.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!