25.08.2015 Views

In the Beginning was Information

6KezkB

6KezkB

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

It should be clear from <strong>the</strong>se examples that no two languages correspond fullyin respect to word meanings, and <strong>the</strong>y do not at all correspond wheregrammatical and semantic structures are concerned. Every language has itsown unique wealth, its own special complexity, and also its own weaknesses.A2.1.3 The Origin of LanguagesThere is a practically limitless number of speculations and <strong>the</strong>ories about<strong>the</strong> origin of human languages [C1]. According to <strong>the</strong> natural sounds andimitation <strong>the</strong>ory, humans mimicked <strong>the</strong> sounds made by animals.Although human languages contain many imitation words, such mimicryof animal sounds cannot be employed for a systematic analysis, becauseimitations vary quite arbitrarily from nation to nation. When a Germancock crows, it cries “kikeriki”, for example, an English cock crows “cocka-doodle-doo”,while Russians reproduce this sound as “kukuriki”. AnEskimo can convincingly imitate <strong>the</strong> call of a whale, but it does not occurto him to name a whale by this sound.O<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>ories maintain that human languages were derived from emotionalexclamations, or that <strong>the</strong> first words were sounds used to accompanyor emphasise certain gesticulations. The evolutionary idea of anupwards development of grunts and snorts to cultural languages through<strong>the</strong> primitive languages of aboriginal nations has been thoroughly refutedby comparative linguistics. Even <strong>the</strong> different and separated Amerindiantribes in California possessed an extremely complex and subtle language.It <strong>was</strong> practically impossible to unlock this language grammatically andtranslate it adequately. The most complex Amerindian language of all isComanche [C1]. Some sounds are whispered and o<strong>the</strong>rs have to beformed by using only <strong>the</strong> larynx. During <strong>the</strong> first World War this language<strong>was</strong> used as a secret code [U1]. Two Comanche <strong>In</strong>dians were employedfor telephone messages, one at each end; at <strong>the</strong> transmitting end one of<strong>the</strong>m translated <strong>the</strong> English message into Comanche, and <strong>the</strong>se messagescould not be deciphered, because <strong>the</strong> grammar <strong>was</strong> too far removed fromEuropean languages, and it would have taken several years of intensivestudy for <strong>the</strong> opposing side to have learned <strong>the</strong> language.Such “code talkers” were employed during <strong>the</strong> Second World war as well,having been selected from different tribes (e. g. Comanche, Chippewa,Hopi, and Navajo), and <strong>the</strong> American Marine Corps employed 375 Navajos[U1]. The first four verses of <strong>the</strong> Gospel of John might serve to convey<strong>the</strong> complexity of this language:2121 Hodeeyáadi Saad jílí, Saad éí Diyin God bil hojíló, índa Saad éíDiyin God jílí. 2 T’ áá éí hodeeyáadi Diyin God bil hojíló; 3 éí t’áá’alt-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!