25.08.2015 Views

In the Beginning was Information

6KezkB

6KezkB

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

and <strong>the</strong> correct optical rotation, it would still not be <strong>the</strong> start ofevolution. There must be a coding system to store informationabout this protein so that it can be replicated at a later stage. But acoding system can never originate in matter as precluded by Theorem11. The Miller experiments thus does not contribute to anexplanation of <strong>the</strong> origin of life.Q15: SOS signals are periodic; does this not contradict your necessarycondition NC2 (paragraph 4.2)?A15: OTTO is also periodic, but it still is information. It is possiblethat brief sequences of symbols can contain periodic repetitions,but nobody would regard <strong>the</strong> decimal number 12.12 as aperiodic fraction just because of <strong>the</strong> repetition of <strong>the</strong> digits.Q16: Can new information originate through mutations?A16: This idea is central in representations of evolution, but mutationscan only cause changes in existing information. There can beno increase in information, and in general <strong>the</strong> results are injurious.New blueprints for new functions or new organs cannot arise; mutationscannot be <strong>the</strong> source of new (creative) information.Q17: When <strong>the</strong> structure of a crystal is studied by means of amicroscope, much information may be gained. Where and who is<strong>the</strong> sender in this case?A17: No coding system is involved in this example and reality isobserved directly. This case lies outside <strong>the</strong> domain of definition ofinformation as discussed in Chapter 5. The substitutionary functionis absent, so that <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>orems cannot be applied.Q18: Has your definition of information been selected arbitrarily(see chapter 4 and 5)? Could <strong>the</strong>re not be o<strong>the</strong>r possibilities?A18: Of course one could select o<strong>the</strong>r definitions, as often happens.My purpose <strong>was</strong> to demarcate a region where assertions of<strong>the</strong> nature of natural laws can be made. It is only in this way possibleto formulate definitive assertions for unknown cases by meansof known empirical <strong>the</strong>orems. The domain of definition is thus notas arbitrary as it might appear, but it has been dictated in <strong>the</strong> lastinstance by empirical realities.Q19: Biological systems are more complicated than technical systems.So shouldn’t an individual definition be introduced for biologicalinformation?127

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!