In the Beginning was Information

“The final result of all my researches and discussions is that thetheory of evolution should be discarded in its entirety, becauseit always leads to extreme contradictions and confusing consequenceswhen tested against the empirical results of research onthe formation of different kinds of living forms and relatedfields. This assertion would agitate many people. Moreover: mynext conclusion is that, far from being a benign natural-philosophicalschool of thought, the theory of evolution is a severeobstacle for biological research. As many examples show, itactually prevents the drawing of logical conclusions from evenone set of experimental material. Because everything mustbe bent to fit this speculative theory, an exact biology cannotdevelop.”Prof. Dr Bruno Vollmert of Karlsruhe, an expert in the field ofmacro-molecular chemistry, has shown that all experiments purportingto support evolution, miss the crux of the matter [V1]:“All hitherto published experiments about the poly-condensationof nucleotides or amino acids are irrelevant to the problem ofevolution at the molecular level, because they were based onsimple monomers, and not on ‘primeval soups’ derived fromMiller experiments. But poly-condensation experiments withprimeval soups or the dissolved mix of substances of them arejust as superfluous as attempts to construct perpetual motionmachines.”A French Nobel laureate, A. Lwoff [L2], pointed out that everyorganism can only function in terms of the complex net of availableinformation:“An organism is a system of interdependent structures and functions.It consists of cells, and the cells are made of moleculeswhich have to cooperate smoothly. Every molecule must knowwhat the others are doing. It must be able to receive messagesand act on them.”When considering the source of this information, we can now formulatethe following theorem which is based on research of manythousands of man-years:106