Åke Lernmark, MD, Ph.D., and his colleagues atHagedorn Research Laboratory in Denmark, firstreported 64K proteins in humans in 1982.Steinunn Baekkeskov, Ph.D., played a primary role indetecting <strong>the</strong> 64K protein in humans and later worked incollaboration <strong>with</strong> Yale researchers to identify <strong>the</strong> proteinas <strong>GAD</strong>.Mark Atkinsson, Ph.D., and colleagues at <strong>the</strong> Universityof Florida in Gainesville, concluded in 1990 that 64Kauto<strong>anti</strong>bodies might be <strong>the</strong> earliest and best marker fordiabetes yet identified.techniques for detecting membrane proteins while studying<strong>the</strong> role of <strong>anti</strong>gens in African sleeping sickness. Usingnewly developed and very sensitive tests such as <strong>the</strong>“immunoprecipitation technique”, Drs. Baekkeskov,Lernmark and colleagues at <strong>the</strong> Hagedorn found 80-90percent of blood serum samples from children <strong>with</strong>newly diagnosed diabetes had <strong>anti</strong>bodies to an unidentifiedICSA <strong>with</strong> molecular weight of approximately 64,000daltons-or 64 kilodaltons. They dubbed <strong>the</strong> mystery protein64K, and reported <strong>the</strong>ir findings in 1982 in Nature.In 1984, <strong>the</strong>y reported that 64K <strong>anti</strong>bodies were oftenfound in diabetic BB rats (a commonly used animalmodel for human diabetes). One intriguing aspect of thisfinding was that <strong>the</strong> <strong>anti</strong>bodies appeared 40 to 70 daysbefore <strong>the</strong> onset of diabetes. This suggested that <strong>the</strong> 64Kprotein was an early and major target of <strong>the</strong> immunesystem. But did this same predictive effect hold true forhumans as well?They next looked at blood serum samples of 14 peoplewho later developed diabetes. Eleven of <strong>the</strong>m had <strong>anti</strong>bodiesto <strong>the</strong> 64K protein - for up to seven years before <strong>the</strong>ybegan to show symptoms of diabetes. This suggested that64K <strong>anti</strong>bodies might be an early warning sign for <strong>the</strong>eventual development of diabetes.In <strong>the</strong> summer of 1986 Dr. Atkinson who had beenstudying environmental influences on diabetes in rats at<strong>the</strong> University of Florida in Gainesville, traveled toHagedorn as a visiting scientist. There Baekkeskov taughthim <strong>the</strong> immunoprecipitation technique for detecting64K <strong>anti</strong>bodies. Armed <strong>with</strong> this new skill, he returned to<strong>the</strong> University of Florida, where he and Dr. NoelMaclaren, detected <strong>the</strong> 64K <strong>anti</strong>bodies in nonobese diabetic(NOD) mice, a newly bred type of animal model fordiabetes. Finding <strong>the</strong> 64K <strong>anti</strong>bodies in animals helpedconfirm that <strong>the</strong> 64K <strong>anti</strong>gen was an important feature indiabetes.Drs. Atkinson, Maclaren, and colleagues also studiedfirst-degree relatives of people <strong>with</strong> diabetes, who were athigher risk for developing diabetes <strong>the</strong>mselves. In 1990, in<strong>the</strong> British Journal The Lancet, <strong>the</strong>y reported finding 64Kauto<strong>anti</strong>bodies in 23 of 28 people who developed diabetesup to seven years later. Based on <strong>the</strong>se findings and thoseof <strong>the</strong> Hagedorn researchers <strong>the</strong>y concluded that 64Kmight be <strong>the</strong> earliest and best marker for diabetes yetidentified and might be especially useful for predictingdiabetes.As diabetes researchers became increasingly aware ofhow important this protein was, <strong>the</strong>y set out to analyzeits chemical characteristics to compare <strong>with</strong> known proteins.In 1988, Drs. Solimena, Camilli, and <strong>the</strong>ir colleagues atYale University reported in The New England Journal ofMedicine that <strong>the</strong>y had found <strong>the</strong> target <strong>anti</strong>gen in patients<strong>with</strong> an autoimmune disorder called Stiff-ManSyndrome (“SMS”). SMS is a rare disorder of <strong>the</strong> centralnervous system in which a person’s muscles become moreand more rigid, and painful spasms occur. Patients <strong>with</strong><strong>the</strong> disorder were found to have <strong>anti</strong>bodies to an enzymecalled Glutamic acid Decarboxylase, or <strong>GAD</strong>.<strong>GAD</strong> is responsible for converting <strong>the</strong> amino acid glutamateinto a protein called GABA, which <strong>the</strong> brain cells useto communicate. It turned out that many patients <strong>with</strong>page 8 dmccad june 2003
<strong>GAD</strong> <strong>anti</strong>bodies had diabetes – even <strong>the</strong> ones who neverdeveloped SMS. Moreover, <strong>the</strong>y found that <strong>anti</strong>bodies from<strong>the</strong> serum of SMS patients targeted <strong>the</strong> beta cells, and <strong>the</strong>sewere not any of <strong>the</strong> previously known <strong>anti</strong>bodies.This led to an historic collaboration between Dr.Baekkeskov, now at <strong>the</strong> University of California, SanFrancisco, and <strong>the</strong> Yale research team. Dr. Camilli sentBaekkeskov blood serum samples from SMS patients (containing<strong>GAD</strong> <strong>anti</strong>bodies), and she sent him blood serumsamples from diabetes patients (containing 64K <strong>anti</strong>bodies).Then <strong>the</strong>y used various methods to demonstrate that<strong>the</strong> proteins were completely identical. The end result ofthis meeting of <strong>the</strong> minds was <strong>the</strong>ir landmark paper inNature identifying <strong>the</strong> 64K protein as <strong>the</strong> enzyme <strong>GAD</strong>.The discovery set off a flurry of interest in <strong>GAD</strong> by diabetesresearchers.Send in <strong>the</strong> ClonesDr. Kaufman, who had been studying <strong>the</strong> role of <strong>GAD</strong> inneurological diseases such as epilepsy, became interested indiabetes one day in 1990 when his car broke down. Whilewaiting for it to be fixed, he went to <strong>the</strong> library, wherehe stumbled on <strong>the</strong> article by Dr. Atkinson and colleaguesin The Lancet describing <strong>the</strong> 64K <strong>anti</strong>bodies as predictorsof diabetes.According to Kaufman, <strong>the</strong> landmark paper identifying64K as <strong>GAD</strong> had yet to appear in Nature, but he was ableto put <strong>the</strong> two toge<strong>the</strong>r for himself: He knew about <strong>the</strong> roleof <strong>GAD</strong> in SMS and <strong>the</strong> fact that it was found in beta cells,and he also knew that that molecular weight of <strong>GAD</strong> wasapproximately 64kD. He joined forces <strong>with</strong> <strong>the</strong> researchteam at <strong>the</strong> University of Florida, as well as <strong>with</strong> his formermentor at <strong>the</strong> UCLA Dr. Tobin, who was researching <strong>the</strong>role of <strong>GAD</strong> in Huntington’s disease and epilepsy. Therewere known to be slightly different molecules of <strong>GAD</strong>found in <strong>the</strong> brain – one weighing 67kD (<strong>GAD</strong>67) and asmaller one weighing 65kD (<strong>GAD</strong>65). As a graduate studentworking <strong>with</strong> Tobin, Kaufman had worked out <strong>the</strong> geneticsequence for <strong>GAD</strong>67, and ano<strong>the</strong>r graduate student Dr.Erlander, had done <strong>the</strong> same for <strong>GAD</strong>65. Thanks in part tothis work, Dr. Tobin’s laboratory was now able to makeboth forms of <strong>GAD</strong> in qu<strong>anti</strong>ty using genetically alteredbacteria.Spurred by <strong>the</strong> news that 64K was <strong>GAD</strong>, o<strong>the</strong>r researchgroups cloned <strong>GAD</strong>. In 1988, Dr. Lernmark had moved to<strong>the</strong> University of Washington in Seattle <strong>with</strong> some membersof his former Hagedorn research team. One of <strong>the</strong>seDr. Allan Karlsen, cloned <strong>the</strong> gene for human islet<strong>GAD</strong>65. One of Lernmark’s former graduate student’s, Dr.Birgitte Michelsen, cloned <strong>GAD</strong>67. According to Dr.Lernmark, cloning <strong>GAD</strong> enabled researchers to makerecombinant <strong>GAD</strong> in qu<strong>anti</strong>ties <strong>the</strong>y had never dreamedAllan Tobin, Ph.D., and Daniel L. Kaufman, Ph.D., at <strong>the</strong> University of California at Los Angeles published one of two1993 papers in “Nature” confirming that <strong>GAD</strong> is <strong>the</strong> first known target of <strong>the</strong> T cell attack in diabetes.of. Cloning <strong>GAD</strong>65 also enabled researchers to determinewhich molecule was <strong>the</strong> alter ego of 64K.The researchers in Tobin’s lab sought help from aUCLA diabetes expert, Dr. Michael Clare-Salzler, tostudy <strong>GAD</strong>’s role in diabetes. Using blood serum samplesfrom diabetic patients <strong>with</strong> newly diagnosed diabetes providedby Dr. Clare-Salzler, <strong>the</strong> researchers showed that96% of patients <strong>with</strong> newly diagnosed diabetes had <strong>anti</strong>bodiesto one or both forms of <strong>GAD</strong>. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, itappeared that 64K was <strong>GAD</strong>65, <strong>the</strong> smaller of <strong>the</strong> twomolecules that had been identified.Dr. Erlander also used a computer search that uncoveredstructural similarities between both forms of <strong>GAD</strong>and proteins in <strong>the</strong> Coxsackie virus, a virus known toinfect many people who eventually developed diabetes.“That moment was probably <strong>the</strong> most exciting moment inmy whole scientific life!” Dr. Tobin recalled. This findingsupported a <strong>the</strong>ory known as “molecular mimcry”, whichsuggested that infection by <strong>the</strong> Coxsackie virus might setoff <strong>the</strong> immune reaction in diabetes. According to <strong>the</strong>“true identity”pageAs diabetes researchers became increasinglyaware of how important thismystery protein was, <strong>the</strong>y were eager to discover itsdmccad june 20039
- Page 4 and 5: forewordResearch Scientists through
- Page 6 and 7: The Story ofGADRobert Dinsmoor1975R
- Page 10 and 11: theory, the immune system mistakenl
- Page 12 and 13: GAD Back to the Future…Åke Lernm
- Page 14 and 15: 100GAD in GraphsGAD65 DNA vaccinati
- Page 16 and 17: In Nature, Anything that CanHappen
- Page 18 and 19: References1. Baekkeskov, S., et al,
- Page 20 and 21: GAD in GraphsIncidence of diabetes
- Page 22 and 23: References1. Quinn A, et al,MHC cla
- Page 24 and 25: References1. Tisch, R., et al,Induc
- Page 26 and 27: Vaccination with GAD PlasmidSuppres
- Page 28 and 29: GADGAD in GraphsGAD ELISPOT outperf
- Page 30 and 31: GAD in GraphsA1004 wks of age% Inci
- Page 32 and 33: Mark Atkinson, Ph.D.,is an American
- Page 34 and 35: GAD in GraphsIL-4 (pg/ml)2501007550
- Page 36 and 37: References1. Kobayashi T, et al,Isl
- Page 38 and 39: References1. A.Falorni, et al,Radio
- Page 40 and 41: References1. Chattopadhyay, S., et
- Page 42 and 43: Diamyd’s Commercial Development o
- Page 44: T cell GAD65For use of GAD in immun