<strong>Diamyd</strong>’s Commercial Development of a <strong>GAD</strong> VaccineJohn Robertson<strong>Diamyd</strong> Medical has been pioneering both <strong>the</strong> evaluation of clinical safetyand clinical efficacy of <strong>GAD</strong> – <strong>with</strong> a view to its potential use as a vaccine toprevent autoimmune diabetes. Both <strong>the</strong>se achievements were made possibleby <strong>Diamyd</strong>’s early definition of a manufacturing process – capable ofproviding <strong>the</strong> qu<strong>anti</strong>ty and quality of <strong>GAD</strong> required for different stages ofcommercial drug development.Our manufacturing process relies on <strong>the</strong> expression ofrecombinant human <strong>GAD</strong>65 in an insect cell line -grown under special conditions – after infection <strong>with</strong>an insect specific baculovirus containing <strong>the</strong> <strong>GAD</strong>cDNA (our “baculo<strong>GAD</strong>” recombinant clone). This is referred to as<strong>the</strong> baculovirus/insect cell expression system (or BVES). Both <strong>the</strong>qu<strong>anti</strong>ty and quality of <strong>GAD</strong> manufactured by our BVES processhave proven appropriate up to <strong>the</strong> current stage of development – andseem likely to meet our future requirements up to market introduction.While currently at <strong>the</strong> 50 litre scale (<strong>with</strong> each 50L batch providingsufficient <strong>GAD</strong> for thousands of vaccinations) we have alreadyfound that our process can readily be scaled-up to 500 litres (providingtens of thousands of vaccinations per batch). So, pending <strong>the</strong>successful outcome of our Phase II, our manufacturing process seemscapable of producing sufficient <strong>GAD</strong> for fur<strong>the</strong>r clinical developmentand market introduction.Apart from its suitability for manufacturing active <strong>GAD</strong>, <strong>the</strong>BVES also has inherent safety advantages – as a non-mammalianexpression system modified to avoid contact <strong>with</strong> any mammaliancomponents. This implies <strong>the</strong> low risk of contamination of our vaccineby harmful viruses. Moreover, because <strong>the</strong> vast majority of humanviruses are not able to grow in <strong>the</strong> insect cells used, <strong>the</strong> likelihood of<strong>the</strong>se inadvertently being propagated during manufacture and contaminatingour vaccine is considerably reduced. Similarly, because <strong>the</strong>“baculo<strong>GAD</strong>” recombinant clone is an insect-specific virus (that cannot infect mammalian cells) <strong>the</strong> risk imposed by possible residual tracesof residual virus in our vaccine is greatly reduced.A final attribute of our <strong>GAD</strong> <strong>the</strong>rapeutic strategy has recentlySf9Insectcells<strong>Diamyd</strong> - cGMP manufacturerh<strong>GAD</strong>65 Bulk Drug50LfermenterExtract/PurifyrhGA D65Bulk Drug<strong>Diamyd</strong><strong>GAD</strong>recombinantbaculovirusFormulation<strong>Diamyd</strong>Formulation/FillAlum<strong>Diamyd</strong> Vaccinebecome apparent. Despite only one (or a few) small regions (ca. 12amino acids) of <strong>GAD</strong> being thought as likely to be active, we made<strong>the</strong> decision at <strong>the</strong> outset (now 9 years ago) that we would not riskpage 42 dmccad june 2003
No Impact on Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis DevelopmentClinical Score3.532.521.510.50-70 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18DayPBSALUM-<strong>GAD</strong> 2 µgALUM-<strong>GAD</strong> 20 µgALUM-<strong>GAD</strong> 200 µgCTRL-ALUMMean cpm immunoprecipitated<strong>with</strong> serum dilution 1:1000Immunogeneticity of <strong>GAD</strong> is Increased <strong>with</strong> Use of Adjuvant100009000800070006000500040003000200010000Mean <strong>GAD</strong> bufferMean ALUM-<strong>GAD</strong>Mean IFA-<strong>GAD</strong>Assoc. Prof. Robert Harris CMM, Karolinska Institute, Sweden, 2000• Clinical Course of MBP 63-88 –EAE in Lewis ratsProf. Åke Lenmark, University of Washington, Seattle, USA, 2000• Total rat serum lgG <strong>anti</strong>-<strong>GAD</strong> radioimmunoassaychoosing <strong>the</strong> “wrong” portion - and our vaccine would contain <strong>the</strong>full-length <strong>GAD</strong> protein (consisting of 585 amino acids). So, despite<strong>the</strong> obvious difficulties imposed in manufacturing a recombinant proteinof this size (which would be avoided by syn<strong>the</strong>sising a peptideinstead) we decided that our vaccine would contain full-length, natural<strong>GAD</strong> protein - leaving <strong>anti</strong>gen processing and presentation of <strong>the</strong>appropriate region (“determinant”) to that individual patients immunesystem. This decision not to pursue <strong>GAD</strong> peptide <strong>the</strong>rapy seems tohave paid off in view of recent scientific reports that repeat injectionsof protein fragments (“peptides”) can confuse <strong>the</strong> immune system andresult in immune over-reaction (anaphylaxis) – that can be life threateningin experimental animals. This response is not shown by <strong>the</strong>respective (intact) proteins. Our use of <strong>the</strong> full-length <strong>GAD</strong>65 proteinin our vaccine avoids this.Our initial manufacturing was conducted to <strong>the</strong> principles of GLP(“Good Laboratory Practice”) and was used successfully for all preclinicalsafety studies and clinical Phase I (in healthy volunteers).These ca. 25 different pre-clinical safety studies used various qu<strong>anti</strong>tiesof ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>GAD</strong> alone, or <strong>the</strong> <strong>GAD</strong> vaccine (alum-<strong>GAD</strong>), in severaldifferent species, and administered by different routes. All <strong>the</strong>sestudies followed international regulatory requirements to establish <strong>the</strong>pre-clinical safety after <strong>GAD</strong> administration, and <strong>the</strong>reby provided<strong>the</strong> basis for Phase II development. In contrast to <strong>the</strong> pre-clinical andPhase I stages, however, <strong>the</strong> <strong>GAD</strong> vaccineused for Phase II is manufactured to <strong>the</strong> highestquality standard available for manufactureof clinical <strong>the</strong>rapeutics. This is “cGMP”(or “current Good Manufacturing Practice”)– that will also be required for all future clinicaldevelopment.<strong>Diamyd</strong>’s development of <strong>the</strong> <strong>GAD</strong> vaccinehas now culminated <strong>with</strong> completion of ourPhase II clinical trial in 47 “Type 2” diabetespatients <strong>with</strong> <strong>GAD</strong>-<strong>anti</strong>bodies (LADA). Thisstudy is truly pioneering – in that this is <strong>the</strong>first time patients have received <strong>the</strong> <strong>GAD</strong>vaccine.Prior to un-blinding, I am highly optimisticregarding <strong>the</strong> outcome of this PhaseII. I think this study will be a resoundingsuccess if <strong>the</strong> study outcome includes <strong>the</strong>following:1. <strong>the</strong>re are no safety concerns of alum-<strong>GAD</strong> vaccination2. <strong>the</strong>re is evidence for responses that areconsistent <strong>with</strong> a positive <strong>the</strong>rapeutic effect.John Robertson, Ph.D., has beenDirector of Research Development in<strong>Diamyd</strong> Medical since 1994.Robertson has experience in biotechnologyand toxicology, both fromindustry (Inveresk ResearchInternational, U.K. and ScheringAgrochemicals, U.K.) and academicinstitutes (Karolinska Institute,Stockholm; The Pasteur Institute,Paris; and <strong>the</strong> NIH in Washington).dmccad june 2003page 43
- Page 4 and 5: forewordResearch Scientists through
- Page 6 and 7: The Story ofGADRobert Dinsmoor1975R
- Page 8 and 9: Åke Lernmark, MD, Ph.D., and his c
- Page 10 and 11: theory, the immune system mistakenl
- Page 12 and 13: GAD Back to the Future…Åke Lernm
- Page 14 and 15: 100GAD in GraphsGAD65 DNA vaccinati
- Page 16 and 17: In Nature, Anything that CanHappen
- Page 18 and 19: References1. Baekkeskov, S., et al,
- Page 20 and 21: GAD in GraphsIncidence of diabetes
- Page 22 and 23: References1. Quinn A, et al,MHC cla
- Page 24 and 25: References1. Tisch, R., et al,Induc
- Page 26 and 27: Vaccination with GAD PlasmidSuppres
- Page 28 and 29: GADGAD in GraphsGAD ELISPOT outperf
- Page 30 and 31: GAD in GraphsA1004 wks of age% Inci
- Page 32 and 33: Mark Atkinson, Ph.D.,is an American
- Page 34 and 35: GAD in GraphsIL-4 (pg/ml)2501007550
- Page 36 and 37: References1. Kobayashi T, et al,Isl
- Page 38 and 39: References1. A.Falorni, et al,Radio
- Page 40 and 41: References1. Chattopadhyay, S., et
- Page 44: T cell GAD65For use of GAD in immun