References1. A.Falorni, et al,Radioimmunoassays for glutamic acid decarboxylase(<strong>GAD</strong>65) and <strong>GAD</strong>65 auto<strong>anti</strong>bodies using 35S or 3Hrecombinant human ligands.J.Immunol.Methods 186:89-99,19952. C.L.Vandewalle, et al,Belgian Diabetes Registry: High diagnostic sensitivityof glutamate decarboxylase auto<strong>anti</strong>bodies in IDDM<strong>with</strong> clinical onset between age 20 and 40 years.J.Clin.Endocrinol. & Metab. 80:846-851,19953. A.Falorni, et al,Diagnostic sensitivity of immunodominant epitopes ofglutamic acid decarboxylase (<strong>GAD</strong>65) auto<strong>anti</strong>bodiesin childhood IDDM.Diabetologia 39:1091-98,19964. A.Falorni, et al,Auto<strong><strong>anti</strong>body</strong> recognition of COOH-terminal epitopesof <strong>GAD</strong>65 marks <strong>the</strong> risk for insulin requirement inadult-onset diabetes mellitus. J.Clin.Endocrinol.Metab85:309-316,2000.5. L.Avesani, et al,Improved in planta expression of <strong>the</strong> human isletauto<strong>anti</strong>gen glutamic acid decarboxylase (<strong>GAD</strong>65).Transgenic Research 12:203-212,20036. Marcovina et al,Evaluation of a novel radioimmunoassay using 125 I-labelled human recombinant <strong>GAD</strong>65 for <strong>the</strong> determinationof glutamic acid decarboxylase (<strong>GAD</strong>65) auto<strong>anti</strong>bodiesInt J Lab Res (2000) 30: 21-26Alberto Falorni, MD, PhD is AssociateProfessor in Internal Medicine at <strong>the</strong>University of Perugia, Italy. Falorni has specializedin <strong>the</strong> techniques for <strong>the</strong> study ofhumoral autoimmunity and genetics of Type1 diabetes mellitus and o<strong>the</strong>r endocrine autoimmunediseases. Falorni’s clinical activity isfocused on <strong>the</strong> diagnosis and treatment ofendocrine diseases. Falorni’s main scientificinterests are pathogenesis and prevention ofType 1 diabetes mellitus and of autoimmuneprimary adrenal insufficiency.LADA Diagnostics and <strong>GAD</strong>Transgenic PlantsMAlberto Falorniy main research interest ispathogenesis and preventionof Type 1 diabetesmellitus and o<strong>the</strong>r endocrineautoimmune diseases. Ihave initially focused myattention on <strong>the</strong> role of glutamic acid decarboxylase(<strong>GAD</strong>65) as a target molecule of auto<strong>anti</strong>bodies in Type1 diabetes. The development of a semi-automated procedurefor <strong>the</strong> radioimmunological determination of<strong>GAD</strong>65 auto<strong>anti</strong>bodies in human serum (1) has made itpossible to test <strong>the</strong> diagnostic sensitivity (frequency ofType 1 diabetic patients positive) and specificity (frequencyof non-diabetic subjects negative) of this immunemarker for <strong>the</strong> disease. It was shown that <strong>GAD</strong>65 auto<strong>anti</strong>bodiescan be detected in over 80% of recently diagnosedType 1 diabetic patients and occur more frequentlyamong diabetic females than males. Interestingly,<strong>GAD</strong>65Ab have emerged as <strong>the</strong> immune marker athighest diagnostic sensitivity for adult-onset Type 1 diabetes(2) which has paved <strong>the</strong> way to <strong>the</strong> diagnosticuse of this marker in routine clinical practice to discriminateautoimmune from non-autoimmune cases.In <strong>the</strong> attempt of both identifying novel markersat highest diagnostic accuracy for Type 1 diabetesand elucidating <strong>the</strong> molecular mechanisms of auto<strong><strong>anti</strong>body</strong>formation, I have constructed chimeric molecules,generated by substitution of regions of human<strong>GAD</strong>65 <strong>with</strong> homologous regions of <strong>GAD</strong>67 (aLeanType II diabetesLow risk forinsulin requirement-Clinical diagnosis of adult-onset diabetes mellitus28ObeseType II diabetesScreening for o<strong>the</strong>rautoimmune diseases<strong>GAD</strong> isoenzyme which is not a major diabetes-relatedauto<strong>anti</strong>gen), to define <strong>the</strong> epitope regions of <strong>the</strong>auto<strong>anti</strong>gen recognized by human auto<strong>anti</strong>bodies (3).It was shown that human <strong>GAD</strong>65 auto<strong>anti</strong>bodies areprimarily directed against epitopes located in <strong>the</strong>middle and COOH-terminal regions of <strong>the</strong> enzymeand that levels of <strong>GAD</strong>65 <strong>anti</strong>bodies specific for <strong>the</strong>COOH-terminal end of <strong>the</strong> auto<strong>anti</strong>gen discriminateType 1 diabetic children from <strong><strong>anti</strong>body</strong>-positive childrenwho do not progress towards clinical diabetes.In addition, I have constructed a mutant form ofhuman <strong>GAD</strong>65, generated by site-directed mutagenesisof <strong>the</strong> active site of <strong>the</strong> enzyme, which has provenenzymatically inactive but immunologically indistinguishablefrom “wild-type” human <strong>GAD</strong>65.More recently, I have focused my interest on <strong>the</strong>diagnosis and clinical characteristics of <strong>the</strong> so-calledlatent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA). Ihave demonstrated that <strong>GAD</strong>65 <strong>anti</strong>bodies can bedetected in approximately 10% of a hospital-basedpopulation of patients diagnosed <strong>with</strong> Type 2 diabeteson clinical grounds in Italy (4). Among<strong>GAD</strong>65Ab-positive individuals, high <strong><strong>anti</strong>body</strong> levelsand presence of <strong>anti</strong>bodies directed to <strong>the</strong> COOHterminalend of <strong>the</strong> auto<strong>anti</strong>gen predicted an extremelyhigh risk of progression towards insulin-dependencyand of associated organ-specific autoimmunediseases, such as thyroid autoimmune diseases orautoimmune Addison’s disease. In contrast, <strong>the</strong> presenceof low levels of <strong>GAD</strong>65 <strong>anti</strong>bodies directedonly against <strong>the</strong> middle region of <strong>the</strong> enzyme discriminateda sub-population of LADA patients <strong>with</strong>clinical characteristics very similar to that of <strong><strong>anti</strong>body</strong>-negativeType 2 patients.At present, I am testing <strong>the</strong> hypo<strong>the</strong>sis that <strong>the</strong>islet autoimmune process may be modulated and <strong>the</strong>appearance of clinical signs of <strong>the</strong> disease delayed orprevented by <strong>the</strong> oral administration of recombinanthuman <strong>GAD</strong>65. To make this strategy potentiallyapplicable to clinical studies of primary prevention,we have constructed transgenic plants expressinghuman <strong>GAD</strong>65 (5), that can potentially allow us toadminister <strong>the</strong> human auto<strong>anti</strong>gen <strong>with</strong>out <strong>the</strong> needfor costly and time-consuming procedures of proteinpurification. We have demonstrated that, in transgenicplants, <strong>GAD</strong>65 accumulates in chloroplast tylacoidsand mitochondria and that <strong>the</strong> targeting ofhuman <strong>GAD</strong>65 to <strong>the</strong> plant cell cytosol (by substitutionof <strong>the</strong> NH 2 -terminal end of <strong>the</strong> protein <strong>with</strong> ahomologous region of <strong>GAD</strong>67) is associated <strong>with</strong> a 5-fold increase of expression levels. Ongoing studies aretesting <strong>the</strong> effect of <strong>the</strong> oral administration of transgenicplant material containing human <strong>GAD</strong>65 inanimal models of spontaneous autoimmune diabetes.page 38 dmccad june 2003
ReferencesT1DM and LADA Differ in<strong>GAD</strong>A Epitope SpecificityDChristiane Hampe, Rattan Juneja, Åke Lernmark, Jerry Palmeriabetes Mellitus is classifiedinto two major forms, Type1 and Type 2 diabetes. Type1 diabetes is characterizedby an autoimmune-mediateddestruction of betacells,leading to insulin deficiency. The autoimmunereaction involves both T cells and <strong>anti</strong>bodies directedagainst islet cell auto<strong>anti</strong>gens that can be detectedin <strong>the</strong> majority of Type 1 diabetes patients (1, 2).The main auto<strong>anti</strong>gens identified are insulin (3), <strong>the</strong>Mr 65,000 isoform of glutamic acid decarboxylase(<strong>GAD</strong>65) (4), and <strong>the</strong> tyrosine phosphatase-like IA-2<strong>anti</strong>gen (5). These auto<strong>anti</strong>bodies are often detectedlong before <strong>the</strong> clinical onset of Type 1 diabetes andare useful to predict disease risk (5, 6). <strong>GAD</strong>65 andIA-2 auto<strong>anti</strong>bodies (Ab) are readily detected bynow standardized (7), precise and reproducible radioimmunoassays(4, 7, 8) suitable for large scale analysisand population screening (6, 9). In contrast, classicalType 2 diabetes patients do not show evidence ofautoimmune beta cell destruction. Patients <strong>with</strong>Type 1 diabetes usually require insulin treatment at<strong>the</strong> time of diagnosis whereas Type 2 patients can besuccessfully treated by diet and oral agents for manyyears. These patients do not show evidence of autoimmunebeta cell destruction. A third group of patientsis referred to as latent autoimmune diabetes inadults (LADA) (10), Type 1.5 diabetes (11), or slowlyprogressive insulin dependent diabetes mellitus(SPIDDM) (12). These patients lose beta cell function,fail oral agents early and require insulin treatment(13, 14). Evidence for an underlying autoimmmunepathogenesis is provided by <strong>the</strong> observationthat many of <strong>the</strong>se patients have islet cell <strong>anti</strong>bodies(ICA), auto<strong>anti</strong>bodies to <strong>GAD</strong>65 (<strong>GAD</strong>65Ab) (10,15, 16), or both. The presence of <strong>GAD</strong>65Ab alone isa sufficient marker for future insulin requirementin younger patients (44 years or younger) while inolder patients <strong>positivity</strong> for both ICA and<strong>GAD</strong>65Ab is a stronger predictor of insulin requirement(17). The question has been raised whe<strong>the</strong>rType 1.5 diabetes represents a separate clinical diseaseor is a slowly progressive form of Type 1 diabetes(18, 19). Epitope mapping of <strong>GAD</strong>65Ab can assist in<strong>the</strong> classification of <strong>the</strong> underlying autoimmunity.Using both <strong>GAD</strong>65/67 fusion proteins (20, 21) and<strong>GAD</strong>65-specific recombinant Fab we and o<strong>the</strong>rswere able to identify phenotype-specific <strong>GAD</strong>65Abepitopes. <strong>GAD</strong>65Ab in newly diagnosed young Type1 diabetes patients recognize restricted epitopes primarilylocated at <strong>the</strong> combined middle-carboxyterminalconformational epitope of <strong>GAD</strong>65, while bindingto <strong>GAD</strong>67 or <strong>the</strong> N-terminus of <strong>GAD</strong>65 isdetected only at a low level. In contrast, <strong>GAD</strong>65Abpositive Type 1.5 diabetes patients exhibit a<strong>GAD</strong>65Ab epitope pattern that is characterized bybinding to both <strong>the</strong> N-terminus of <strong>GAD</strong>65 and to atentative conformational epitope formed of <strong>the</strong>middle and carboxyterminal part of <strong>GAD</strong>65 (22).This <strong>GAD</strong>65Ab epitope profile clearly differs fromthat found in Type 1 diabetes patients and moreresembles <strong>the</strong> broader <strong>GAD</strong>65Ab epitope specificityfound in <strong>GAD</strong>65Ab-positive healthy individuals andfirst-degree relatives (20). This difference in <strong>the</strong> bindingpattern of <strong>GAD</strong>65Ab of Type 1.5 diabetes patientscompared to that of Type 1 diabetes patientssupports <strong>the</strong> notion that <strong>the</strong> disease process maydiffer between <strong>the</strong>se two types of patients. We <strong>the</strong>reforesuggest that Type 1.5 diabetes might be a subtypeof Type 1 diabetes characterized by separateimmunologic features. <strong>GAD</strong>65Ab epitope patternsmay be useful to identify Type 1.5.Christiane Hampe, Ph.D., has a position asjunior faculty at <strong>the</strong> University of Washingtonin Seattle. Her research interests are <strong>the</strong> disssectionof <strong>the</strong> role of <strong>GAD</strong>65 and its auto<strong>anti</strong>bodiesin <strong>the</strong> pathogenesis of Type 1 diabetes.While <strong>the</strong>se auto<strong>anti</strong>bodies are widely acceptedas markers for <strong>the</strong> disease, preliminarydata indicate that disease-specific <strong>GAD</strong>65Abmodulate T cell responses. Hampe’s currentresearch goals are to understand <strong>the</strong> effect of<strong>GAD</strong>65Ab on processing and presentation of<strong>GAD</strong>65.1. Bonifacio E, et al,Islet auto<strong><strong>anti</strong>body</strong> markers in IDDM: risk assessmentstrategies yielding high sensitivity.Diabetologia 38:816-822, 19952. Landin-Olsson M, et al,Islet cell and o<strong>the</strong>r organ-specific auto<strong>anti</strong>bodies in allchildren developing Type 1 (insulin-independent) diabetesmellitus in Sweden during one year and in matchedcontrols.Diabetologia 32:387-395, 19893. Palmer JP, et al,Insulin <strong>anti</strong>bodies in insulin-dependent diabetics beforeinsulin treatment. Science 222:1337-1339, 19834. Grubin CE, et al,A novel radioligand binding assay to determine diagnosticaccuracy of isoform-specific glutamic acid decarboxylase<strong>anti</strong>bodies in childhood IDDM.Diabetologia 37:344-350, 19945. Verge CF, et al,Prediction of Type I diabetes in first-degree relativesusing a combination6. Bingley PJ, et al,Prediction of IDDM in <strong>the</strong> general population:Strategies based on combinations of auto<strong><strong>anti</strong>body</strong>markers.Diabetes 46:1701-1710, 19977. Mire-Sluis AR, et al,The development of a World Health Organisationinternational standard for islet cell <strong>anti</strong>bodies: <strong>the</strong> aimsand design of an international collaborative study.Diabetes Metab Res Rev 15:72-77, 19998. Verge CF, et al,Combined use of auto<strong>anti</strong>bodies (IA-2) auto<strong><strong>anti</strong>body</strong>,<strong>GAD</strong> auto<strong><strong>anti</strong>body</strong>, insulin auto<strong><strong>anti</strong>body</strong>, cytoplasmicislet cell <strong>anti</strong>bodies) in Type 1 diabetes: CombinatorialIslet Auto<strong><strong>anti</strong>body</strong> Workshop.Diabetes 47:1857-1866, 19989. Rolandsson O, et al,Glutamate decarboxylase (<strong>GAD</strong>65) and tyrosine phosphatase-likeprotein (IA-2) auto<strong>anti</strong>bodies index in aregional population is related to glucose intoleranceand body mass index.Diabetologia 42:555-559, 199910. Tuomi T, et al,Antibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase reveallatent autoimmune diabetes mellitus in adults <strong>with</strong> anon-insulin-dependent onset of disease.Diabetes 42:359-362, 199311. Harris MI, et al,Classification of diabetes mellitus and o<strong>the</strong>r catagoriesof glucose intolerance. In: Keen H, DeFronzo R,Alberti K, Zimmet P, ed.The international textbook of diabetes mellitus.London: Wiley, 1992, 3-18.12. Ludvigsson J, et al,HLA-DR3 is associated <strong>with</strong> amore slowly progressiveform of Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes.Diabetologia 29:207-210, 198613. Temple RC, et al,Insulin deficiency in non-insulin-dependent diabetes.Lancet 1:293-295, 198914. Gjessing HJ, et al,Fasting plasma c-peptide, glucagon stimulated plasmac-peptide, and urinary c-peptide in relation to clinicaltype of diabetes.Diabetologia 32:305-311, 198915. Groop LC, et al,Islet cell <strong>anti</strong>bodies identify latent Type 1 diabetes inpatients aged 35-75 years at diagnosis.Diabetes 35:237-241, 198616. Rowley MJ, et al,Antibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase discriminatemajor types of diabetes mellitus.Diabetes 41:548-551, 199217. Turner R, et al,UKPDS 25: auto<strong>anti</strong>bodies to isle T cell cytoplasm andglutamic acid decarboxylase for prediction of insulinrequirement in Type 2 diabetes.UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group [published erratumappears in Lancet 1998 Jan 31;351 (9099): 376].Lancet 350:1288-1293, 199718. Juneja R, et al,Autoimmunity 29:65-83, 199919. Tuomi T, et al,Clinical and genetic characteristics of Type 2 diabetes<strong>with</strong> and <strong>with</strong>out <strong>GAD</strong> <strong>anti</strong>bodies.Diabetes 48:150-157, 199920. Hampe CS, et al,Recognition of Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase (<strong>GAD</strong>)by Auto<strong>anti</strong>bodies from Different <strong>GAD</strong> Antibody-Positive Phenotypes.J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:4671-4679, 200021. Falorni A, et al,Diagnostic sensitivity of immunodominant epitopes ofglutamic acid decarboxylase (<strong>GAD</strong>65) auto<strong>anti</strong>bodiesepitopes in childhood IDDM.Diabetologia 39:1091-1098, 199622. Hampe CS, et al,<strong>GAD</strong>65 <strong><strong>anti</strong>body</strong> epitope patterns of Type 1.5 diabeticpatients are consistent <strong>with</strong> slow-onset autoimmunediabetes.Diabetes Care 25:1481-1482., 2002dmccad june 2003page 39
- Page 4 and 5: forewordResearch Scientists through
- Page 6 and 7: The Story ofGADRobert Dinsmoor1975R
- Page 8 and 9: Åke Lernmark, MD, Ph.D., and his c
- Page 10 and 11: theory, the immune system mistakenl
- Page 12 and 13: GAD Back to the Future…Åke Lernm
- Page 14 and 15: 100GAD in GraphsGAD65 DNA vaccinati
- Page 16 and 17: In Nature, Anything that CanHappen
- Page 18 and 19: References1. Baekkeskov, S., et al,
- Page 20 and 21: GAD in GraphsIncidence of diabetes
- Page 22 and 23: References1. Quinn A, et al,MHC cla
- Page 24 and 25: References1. Tisch, R., et al,Induc
- Page 26 and 27: Vaccination with GAD PlasmidSuppres
- Page 28 and 29: GADGAD in GraphsGAD ELISPOT outperf
- Page 30 and 31: GAD in GraphsA1004 wks of age% Inci
- Page 32 and 33: Mark Atkinson, Ph.D.,is an American
- Page 34 and 35: GAD in GraphsIL-4 (pg/ml)2501007550
- Page 36 and 37: References1. Kobayashi T, et al,Isl
- Page 40 and 41: References1. Chattopadhyay, S., et
- Page 42 and 43: Diamyd’s Commercial Development o
- Page 44: T cell GAD65For use of GAD in immun