<strong>GAD</strong> in GraphsIL-4 (pg/ml)250100755025Immunization <strong>with</strong> a <strong>GAD</strong>65/IL-4plasmid DNA vaccine preventsdiabetes in NOD miceB *p=.002untreatedHEL<strong>GAD</strong><strong>GAD</strong>/IL-40Medium <strong>GAD</strong>65 HSP60 CPHTisch et al. (2001) Antigen-specific mediatedsuppression of cell autoimmunity by plasmidDNA vaccination.J Immunol 166:2122-2132• Enhanced secretion of IL-4 anddecreased secretion of IFN-γ by Tcells from NOD mice immunized at12 wks old <strong>with</strong> pDNA encoding<strong>GAD</strong>65-IgFc and IL-4 and restimulated<strong>with</strong> <strong>GAD</strong>65.• Vaccination caused a shift in cytokineresponse to <strong>GAD</strong>65 stimulationOur Story of <strong>GAD</strong>– Serendipity in SciencePaul Zimmet and Ian MackayOur involvement <strong>with</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>GAD</strong> story is one of serendipity. One of us (PZ) was attendinga major international pharmaceutical company advisory board meeting inRome in 1991 and heard <strong>the</strong> presentation of one of <strong>the</strong>ir lead scientists, Dr. BillKnowles. He presented work that he was involved in on islet cell <strong>anti</strong>bodies.This wasjust around <strong>the</strong> time that <strong>GAD</strong> had been identified by Baekkeskov as <strong>the</strong> 64kD <strong>anti</strong>genthat she had discovered in <strong>the</strong> 1980’s – a putative key auto<strong>anti</strong>gen in Type 1 diabetes.I told Bill that I was very keen to have access to a method to measure <strong>anti</strong>-<strong>GAD</strong>. Over a quiet glass of Chi<strong>anti</strong>, Bill told me that he had purified <strong>GAD</strong> from pigbrain and was attempting to develop an assay for <strong>anti</strong>bodies but his company was% Islets100β cell-specific expression of <strong>GAD</strong> isrequired for development of autoimmunediabetes806040200H-AS-<strong>GAD</strong>Tg(-)Islets Status4 retracted3 >50%2 25-50%1 >25%0 NormalYoon et al. (1999) Control of autoimmunediabetes in NOD mice by <strong>GAD</strong> expression orsuppression in β cells Science 284:1183-1190• Islet grafts from transgenic miceexpressing high levels of <strong>anti</strong>sense<strong>GAD</strong>65/67 (H-AS-<strong>GAD</strong>) survivewhen grafted into acutely diabeticNOD mice, while grafts expressing<strong>GAD</strong> (Tg-) are infiltrated anddestroyed• <strong>GAD</strong> is <strong>the</strong> target of autoimmuneattack in diabetesnot all that interested as <strong>the</strong>y were more interested in Type 2 diabetes. I asked himwhe<strong>the</strong>r I could have some <strong>GAD</strong> and he agreed. Knowles became a valued advisorSand collaborator in <strong>the</strong> next phase of our work.o <strong>the</strong> <strong>GAD</strong> came to Melbourneand <strong>with</strong>in a few weeks, <strong>the</strong> nimblefingers of Dr. Merrill Rowleyin our laboratory resulted in <strong>the</strong>development of <strong>the</strong> first radioimmmunoassay(<strong>RIA</strong>) for <strong>anti</strong>-<strong>GAD</strong>,based on radioiodine labelling of <strong>the</strong> Knowles’<strong>GAD</strong> preparation. I was involved <strong>with</strong> <strong>the</strong> developmentof a Type 1 Diabetes Register in ourisland state of Tasmania so I was able to quicklyfind samples to test and we demonstrated highlevels in newly diagnosed and long-standing casesof Type 1 diabetes. The results were publishedin Diabetes as <strong>the</strong> first <strong>RIA</strong> for <strong>anti</strong>-<strong>GAD</strong>.Then again, serendipity came into play. Wewere very interested in <strong>the</strong> fact that a numberof adults were identified <strong>with</strong> diabetes that presentedclinically as Type 2 yet <strong>the</strong>ir naturalhistory over a period of a year or more was indicativeof insulin dependency. We were awarethat a close friend and colleague, Leif Groop,<strong>the</strong>n in Finland, had undertaken a study someyears previously on a group of <strong>the</strong>se patients andhad demonstrated a positive test for islet cell<strong>anti</strong>bodies. Fortuitously, one of his outstandingyoung researchers, Dr. Tiinamaija Tuomi, hadcome to our laboratory as a visiting researcher.She obtained <strong>the</strong> serum samples from Groop’sstudy and we were quickly able to measure <strong>anti</strong>-<strong>GAD</strong> in <strong>the</strong>se subjects: <strong>the</strong> frequency of <strong>anti</strong>-<strong>GAD</strong> in <strong>the</strong>se adult subjects was very high andappeared to be a better predictor of insulindependency than ICA. Indeed, when vigorouslychallenged by a leading authority on ICA at anAmerican Diabetes Association presentation asto our ability to perform <strong>the</strong> measurement ofpage 34 dmccad june 2003
ICA properly, Dr. Tuomi was able to point outthat <strong>the</strong> ICA assays had been performed in hislaboratory!We <strong>the</strong>n had a vigorous debate on what weshould call this slow-onset Type 1 diabetes. LeifGroop favoured <strong>the</strong> term AIDA (autoimmunediabetes in adults) and PZ suggested SODA(slow onset diabetes of adults), but <strong>the</strong> wisdomand status of IM prevailed and we adopted <strong>the</strong>term LADA (latent immune diabetes in adults),not to be confused <strong>with</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mexican telephonecompany or <strong>the</strong> Czech motor car! Tuomi quicklywrote up <strong>the</strong> results and submitted <strong>the</strong> paperto Diabetes – it was accepted <strong>with</strong>in 5 days.With a number of o<strong>the</strong>r studies <strong>with</strong> internationalcollaborators we were able to confirm ourfindings in several different countries and ethnicgroups. The biggest challenge still lay ahead. Wewere battling against <strong>the</strong> ICA “mafia” who stillbelieved that this test was <strong>the</strong> gold standard.Would it be feasible to use <strong>the</strong> <strong>anti</strong>-<strong>GAD</strong> test topredict future diabetes?We <strong>the</strong>n came again through serendipity to astudy we called “Back to <strong>the</strong> Future”.Fortuitously, my colleague in Finland, ProfessorJaakko Tuomilehto, brought to our attentionthat <strong>the</strong> Finnish Women’s Register had takenblood samples from every woman during pregnancysince 1984 and <strong>the</strong>se samples were storedaway at <strong>the</strong> National Finnish Public HealthInstitute. By linking <strong>the</strong>se samples to <strong>the</strong> FinnishType 1 Diabetes Register, and testing <strong>the</strong>m allfor <strong>anti</strong>-<strong>GAD</strong>, we were able to show that up to10 years prior to a woman developing Type 1diabetes, <strong>anti</strong>bodies to <strong>GAD</strong> were present. Thiswas a critical study that confirmed <strong>the</strong> utility of<strong>the</strong> <strong>anti</strong>-<strong>GAD</strong> test as a powerful weapon for <strong>the</strong>prediction of Type 1 diabetes, and establishedthat <strong>the</strong> “latent period” for an autoimmune diseasecould be very long indeed.Later, in a landmark collaboration <strong>with</strong> <strong>the</strong>late Professor Robert Turner on <strong>the</strong> UKPDScohort, we were able to demonstrate that 10% of<strong>the</strong> “pedigree” Type 2 diabetics of this cohortactually had LADA. It is now well demonstratedthat this 10% figure applies in many countriesaround <strong>the</strong> world in terms of <strong>the</strong> number ofsubjects “misclassified” as having Type 2 diabetes.Of course, early prediction of Type 1 diabetesin its long preclinical phase is not that much of“It is now welldemonstrated that this 10%figure applies in many countriesaround <strong>the</strong> world interms of <strong>the</strong> number of subjects“misclassified” as”having Type 2 diabetesa blessing in <strong>the</strong> absence of an effective preventiveregimen. At <strong>the</strong> time of our studies onLADA referred to above, <strong>the</strong>re was a peaking ofinterest in administration of auto<strong>anti</strong>genic preparationsmucosally (oral tolerance) to abrogateautoimmune disorders diabetes included.Administration of <strong>GAD</strong> to NOD mice to retardonset of diabetes, in our studies and those ofo<strong>the</strong>rs, have given at best “promising” results.While earlier enthusiasm for oral tolerance maybe diminishing, we certainly look forward toseeing results of human trials of <strong>the</strong> preventativeuse of <strong>GAD</strong> in LADA.Paul Zimmet isDirector of <strong>the</strong>InternationalDiabetes Instituteand Professor ofDiabetes, MonashUniversity inMelbourne, Australia.His current research includes Type 1 diabetesetiology and <strong>the</strong> molecular mechanismsof Type 2 diabetes, insulin resistance andobesity and <strong>the</strong> effects of life-style changeleading to diabetes, obesity, coronary heartdisease and hypertension in developingcountries in <strong>the</strong> Asia-Pacific region.Intraperitoneal injection of <strong>GAD</strong>65prevents diabetes in NOD mice100 NaClMBP<strong>GAD</strong>-MBP8060402000 10 20 30<strong>GAD</strong>treatment Age (weeks)Pleau et al. (1995). Prevention of autoimmunediabetes in nonobese diabetic female mice bytreatment <strong>with</strong> recombinant glutamic aciddecarboxylase (<strong>GAD</strong>65). Clin Immunol Pathol76:90-95Diabetic animals %Stimulation index log100101<strong>GAD</strong> in Graphs• 4 wk old NOD mice which hadbeen injected ip 3 times <strong>with</strong> <strong>GAD</strong>65were protected from diabetes developmentcompared to mice injected<strong>with</strong> fusion protein (MBP) or saline(NaCl)• ip administration of <strong>GAD</strong>65prevents diabetes<strong>GAD</strong>65 is a key target <strong>anti</strong>gen in <strong>the</strong>induction of murine IDDM<strong>GAD</strong>hsp65cbphinsulin3 4 6 8 12 15Age of mice (weeks)Kaufman et al. (1993) Spontaneous loss of T celltolerance to glutamic acid in murine insulindependentdiabetes. Nature 366:69-72• Spontaneous T cell proliferativeresponses in NOD micefirst develop to <strong>GAD</strong>65, <strong>the</strong>n tohsp65, carboxypeptidase H andto insulin in a defined order.• <strong>GAD</strong>65 is a key diabetogenicauto<strong>anti</strong>gen in murine IDDMdmccad june 2003page 35
- Page 4 and 5: forewordResearch Scientists through
- Page 6 and 7: The Story ofGADRobert Dinsmoor1975R
- Page 8 and 9: Åke Lernmark, MD, Ph.D., and his c
- Page 10 and 11: theory, the immune system mistakenl
- Page 12 and 13: GAD Back to the Future…Åke Lernm
- Page 14 and 15: 100GAD in GraphsGAD65 DNA vaccinati
- Page 16 and 17: In Nature, Anything that CanHappen
- Page 18 and 19: References1. Baekkeskov, S., et al,
- Page 20 and 21: GAD in GraphsIncidence of diabetes
- Page 22 and 23: References1. Quinn A, et al,MHC cla
- Page 24 and 25: References1. Tisch, R., et al,Induc
- Page 26 and 27: Vaccination with GAD PlasmidSuppres
- Page 28 and 29: GADGAD in GraphsGAD ELISPOT outperf
- Page 30 and 31: GAD in GraphsA1004 wks of age% Inci
- Page 32 and 33: Mark Atkinson, Ph.D.,is an American
- Page 36 and 37: References1. Kobayashi T, et al,Isl
- Page 38 and 39: References1. A.Falorni, et al,Radio
- Page 40 and 41: References1. Chattopadhyay, S., et
- Page 42 and 43: Diamyd’s Commercial Development o
- Page 44: T cell GAD65For use of GAD in immun