department for preventive conservation national ... - WebSajtovi

azlikuju po tehnologiji, konstrukciji, obliku i okruženju.Restoran u Kaunasu (slika 2) ne uklapa se ni na kojinačin u tradicionalnu arhitekturu (on predstavlja kopijuruske arhitekture po formi, konstrukciji, tehnologiji),pa se ne može smatrati dobrim primerom. Druge dvezgrade (slike 3 i 4) podignute su u tradicionalnom okruženju(blizu puta). Forma ili fasada gostionice/restoranau blizini autoputa (sl. 3) preuzeta je od vlastelinskihkuća iz XVIII veka. Tu je došlo je do nesklada saokruženjem, jer su vlastelinske kuće uvek građene u prirodnomambijentu, daleko od puteva. Stari građevinskimaterijal korišćen za ovu gostionicu/restoran (preuzetod starih pomoćnih zgrada) smanjuje nesklad (izmeđuistorijske forme i okruženja) i čini ceo objekat prihvatljivim.Poslednji primer (slika 4) ne predstavlja ni kopijuni repliku. Tehnologija, konstrukcija i forma nastavljajulokalnu tradiciju gradnje, pa se gostionica možesmatrati dobrim primerom novogradnje.ZaključakDvadeset prvi vek zahteva da se kulturni identitet iraznovrsnost očuvaju, a u arhitekturi oni se baziraju nakontinuitetu jedinstvenog karaktera gradnje. Arhitektonskonasleđe treba shvatiti kao potencijal za trenutnii mogući dalji razvoj. Očuvanje ovih kulturnih resursazahteva saradnju da bi se ostvarila interdisplinarnost uistraživanjima i praktičnim iskustvima. Samo saradnjomi razmenom ideja i iskustava možemo da razumemojedinstvenost/distinkciju i da raznovrsnošću obogatimoevropsku kulturu.Ala Staškevič, Šef Laboratorije za muzeologiju imuzejsku delatnost, Beloruski državni institut zakulturna pitanjaStaklene posude beloruskihzamkova krajem XV i u prvojpolovini XVII vekaArheološki predmeti su danas, možda, jedinstven izvorza istraživanje materijalne kulture beloruskihzamkova ranog i kasnog srednjeg veka.Većina poznatihvlastelinskih domova je napuštena i uništena tokombrojnih ratova i građanskih sukoba, koji predstavljajuizrazito obeležje celokupne beloruske istorije. Velikideo, nekada bogatih i zadivljujućih zbirki beloruskearistokratije, preneli su u inostranstvo njihovi vlasniciodmah nakon Ruske oktobarske revolucije (1917.), iz istočnihbeloruskih oblasti, a nakon 1939. 1 i iz zapadnih.Kao rezultat toga, zbirke poljskih i ruskih muzeja suobogaćene velikim kulturnim vrednostima. Tokom Drugogsvetskog rata takođe je veliki broj vrednih predmetaiznet iz Belorusije.Sve ono što danas čuvamo u beloruskim muzejima iprivatnim zbirkama predstavlja samo mali deo beloruskogkulturnog blaga.Zahvaljujući obimnim arheološkim iskopavanjima,1980.-1990. godine, koja su na području starih gradovai zamkova sprovodili beloruski arheolozi O. Trusov, M.Tkačev, I. Černiavski,V. Sobol i drugi, bilo je moguće rekonstruisatipredstavu o domaćoj kulturi plemstva igradskog stanovništva krajem XV i u prvoj poloviniXVII veka.Kakav je bio položaj staklara u materijalnoj kulturi1 Nakon Pakta u Rigi 1921, sklopljenog izme?u Poljske i Rusije,zapadne beloruske oblasti došle su pod poljsku jurisdikciju. Godine1939, 17. septembra, teritorija Belorusije je vra?ena u svoje etni?kegranice.46in this tavern/restaurant (taken from the old outhouses)counterweigh/offset the imbalance (historical form withenvironment) and make it well acceptable. The lastexample (Fig. 4) does not copy/replicate anything. Technology,construction and form continue/keep up localbuilding tradition so tavern, as example of new buildingcould be estimated pretty good.ConslusionsThe 21 st century requires to conserve cultural identityand diversity, which are in architecture based on continuityof a unique character of building. Architecturalheritage should be understood as resources for presentand prospective/further development. The preservationof those cultural resources require/claim to cooperateour endeavour/striving for an interdisciplinary overviewof the actual research and practical experiences. Onlycooperating our knowledge and sharing the ideas andexperience we can perceive our oneness/distinction andto enrich European culture by its diversity.Alla Stashkevich, Head of Laboratory of Museologyand Museum Activity, Belarusian State Instituteof Culture ProblemsGlassware of the BelarusianCastles at the end of 15 th - thefirst half of the 17 th centuriesArcheological materials today are, perhaps, a uniquesource in the research of the material culture of theBelarusian castles of the early and late Middle Ages.Themajority of the known feudal manors was deserted andruined during numerous wars and civil fights which weredistinctive feature of the Belarusian history at all times.The huge part of the former rich and magnificentcollections of the Belarusian aristocracy was takenabroad by the owners of manors right after the RussianOctober revolution (1917) from the east Belarusian territories,and after 1939 1 – from the western ones. As result,many cultural values have enriched collections ofthe Polish and Russian museums. During the SecondWorld War a plenty of values also has been taken out ofthe borders of Belarus.Everything, that we have today in the Belarusianmuseums and private collections is only a small part ofthe Belarusian national heritage.Due to intensive archeological excavations in the1980-1990 in the territory of ancient cities and castlesby the expeditions of the Belarusian archeologistsO.Trusov, M.Tkachev, I.Chernyavsky,V.Sobol, etc., it waspossible to restore a picture of household culture of noblesand townspeople by the end of 15-th and first halfof the 17-th centuries.What was the position of glassmakers in the materialculture of this period? What was the level of popularityof imported glass products and what about the localones? What was the artistic and technological levelof the local glass-making during this period? We shalltry to answer these questions, using the archeologicaldata and some analogies from the published Russianand Polish sources.The mentioned period in the scientific literature is1 After the Riga Pact in 1921 between Poland and Russia thewestern Belarusian lands have departed to Poland. In September,17, 1939 the territory of Belarus has been restored in its ethnic borders.