department for preventive conservation national ... - WebSajtovi

odnom muzeju, i na osnovu ove posete urađena je analizastanja prostora.Tokom kursa učesnicima je omogućeno da daju svojeviđenje osnovnih potreba na polju zaštite na arheološkomterenu i kažu na koji način kurs može da doprinese njihovomprofesionalnom usavršavanju. Diskusija o potrebamai izazovima u konzervaciji na arheološkom terenu uSrbiji i Crnoj Gori i Sloveniji je pokazala da u oblastizaštite ne postoji adekvatna politika Ministarstva kulture,da je prekinut kontinuitet dugoročnih programa i dasu iskustva u konzervaciji na terenu slaba. Naglašeno jeda dodatne probleme predstavljaju nedostatak razmeneiskustava, obučenih kadrova, uslova, saradnje izmeđukonzervatora i arheologa i finansijske podrške. Postavljenoje pitanje preventivne zaštite i prisustva konzervatorana terenu i pomenuta potreba za stvaranjem interventnihkonzervatorskih ekipa za rad na terenu.Insistiralo se na potrebi za promenama na nacionalnomnivou, definisanjem jasne kulturne politike u zemlji,promenama u zakonu, i ukazalo se na značaj kojimogu da imaju nacionalni komiteti internacionalnih organizacijau tim procesima.Prema učesnicima kurs je dao pregled stanja konzervacijei arheologije u Srbiji i Crnoj Gori, neka praktična,jednostavna i jeftina rešenja i ukazao na osnovne problemeu konzervaciji na terenu. Osnovna zamerka učesnikana sadržaj kursa je nedostatak praktičnih primera i aktivnosti.Organizatori su dali informaciju da je kursuvodni i da će se nastaviti, ali su i konstatovali da je moglodoći do zablude o sadržaju kursa na osnovu naslova,budući da je termin konzervacija identifikovan sa konzervatorskimtretmanom, a ne shvaćen šire kao zaštita.course can contribute to their professional development.Discussion on needs and challenges in archeologicalconservation in Serbia and Montenegro and Sloveniarevealed that in the area of protection the adequatepolicy of Ministry of Culture did not exist, that continuityof long-term programmes was interrupted andthat experiences in archaeological conservation wereinsufficient. It was pointed out that additional problemswere caused by the lack of exchange of experience, ofeducated staff, conditions, cooperation between conservatorsand archaeologists and financial support. Participantsadvocated the need of having conservators onthe field and for creating interventive conservators teamsfor field work.The participants insisted on changes at the nationallevel, formulating explicit cultural policy in the country,changing the current law. They also pointed out that nationalcommittees of international organizations canhave important role in these processes.According to participants course offered a review ofconditions of conservation and archaeology in Serbiaand Montenegro, some practical, simple and cost effectingsolutions and indicated basic problems in archaeologicalconservation. Main participants’ objection to thecourse contents was the lack of practical examples andactivities. The organisators explained that the coursewas an introductory one andthat it would be continued.Finally, it was concluded that one could get wrong impressionabout course content because of its title, beingthat term conservation could be identified with actualconservation treatment and not comprehended in broadersense as protection.