Sectioned Convolution SCDWT

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Efficiency Comparison of 1-D DWTFilterLengthDWT <strong>SCDWT</strong> EI<strong>SCDWT</strong>8 - 38.86% 29.03%16 - 46.51% 38.36%32 - 52.37% 45.14%64 - 56.06% 49.56%* DWT level is fixed, Input length is fixed
Page 1 and 2:
Sectioned ConvolutionandSCDWT N.C
Page 4:
i. Abstractii. Sectioned Convolutio
Page 7 and 8:
how to perform the“ convolution
Page 9 and 10: Here is a problem.....
Page 11 and 12: Signal LengthN + M - 1Filter Length
Page 13 and 14: MultsAddsRadix - 2 N/2 log2N N log2
Page 15 and 16: we split the input signal intosecti
Page 17 and 18: x0[n]M-1Lnx1[n]M-1nL
Page 19 and 20: what is the advantage ofoverlap-sav
Page 21 and 22: ii. it does not increase thesystem
Page 23 and 24: The complexity of sectionedconvolut
Page 25 and 26: what is the advantage ofsectioned c
Page 28: ii. Saving Time
Page 32 and 33: The Complexity of Sectioned Convolu
Page 34: i. Saving Energyii.Saving Timeiii.B
Page 38 and 39: * kj is the input length in each le
Page 40 and 41: The Complexity of 1-Dimension DWT1t
Page 44 and 45: 1-Dimension EIDWTLP g0(n)approximat
Page 46 and 47: one of the advantages ofSCDWT is...
Page 49 and 50: 2-Dimension DWTLP g(n)2↓LP g(n)HP
Page 51 and 52: The Complexity of 2-Dimension DWT
Page 53: The Complexity of 2-Dimension SCDWT
Page 58 and 59: Efficiency Comparison of 1-D DWTInp
Page 62 and 63: Conclusion and Future Work
Page 64 and 65: Reference[1] Gerard P. M. Egelmeers
show all

Sectioned Convolution SCDWT

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?