A Look at Amazon Basin Seasonal Dynamics with the Biophysical ...
A Look at Amazon Basin Seasonal Dynamics with the Biophysical ... A Look at Amazon Basin Seasonal Dynamics with the Biophysical ...
Rationalizing Burned Carbon with Carbon Monoxide Exported from South AmericaR. Chatfield 1 , S. R. Freitas 2 , M. A. Silva Dias 2, and P. L. Silva Dias 22NASA Ames Research Center, Bldg. 245-5, Moffett Field, CA, 94035, USA, E-mail: chatfield@clio.arc.nasa.gov,2Rua do Matão, 1226, Departamento de Ciências Atmosféricas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, BrazilE-mail: sfreitas@model.iag.usp.br; mafdsdia@model.iag.usp.br; pldsdias@model.iag.usp.br;We present several estimates cross-checking the fluxes of carbon to the atmosphere from burning,comparing models that are based on simple land-surface parameterizations and atmospheric transportdynamics. Both estimates made by NASA Ames and USP modeling techniques are quite highcompared to some detailed satellite/land-use studies of emissions. The flux of carbon liberated to theatmosphere via biomass burning is important for several reasons. This flux is a fundemental statisticfor the parameterization of the large-scale flux of gases controlling the reactive greenhouse gasesmethane and ozone. Similarly, it is central to the estimation of the translocation of nitrogen andpyrodenitrification in the tropics. Thirdly, CO 2 emitted from rainforest clearing contributes directly tocarbon lost from the rainforest system as it contributes to greenhouse gas forcing. While CO 2 frompasturage, agriculture, etc, is considered to be reabsorbed seasonally, and so “off budget” for thecarbon cycle, it must also be accounted. CO 2 anomalies related to daily weather and interannualclimatic variation are strong enough to perturb our scientific perception of long-term carbon storagetrends. We compare fluxes deduced from land-use statistics (originally, W.M. Hao) and from satellitehot pixels (A. Setzer) with atmospheric fluxes determined by the mescoscale/continental scale modelsRAMS and MM5, and point to some new work with highly resolved global models (the NASA DataAssimilation Office’s GEOS4). Our simulations are tied to events, so that measured tracers like COtie the models directly to the burning and meteorology of a specific period. We point out a particularsensitivity in estimates based on CO, and indicate how analysis of CO 2 along with other biomassburningtracers may lead to an improved multi-species estimator of carbon burned.
- Page 558: CHARACTERISTICS OF THE CONVECTIVE C
- Page 562: Igor Trosnikov:Center for Weather F
- Page 566: Soil Temperature and Moisture Varia
- Page 570: CONTINENTAL SQUALL LINE FORMATION O
- Page 574: Towards a South American Land Data
- Page 578: SOME CHARACTERISTICS OF THE TURBULE
- Page 582: THE CONVECTIVE SYSTEM AREA EXPANSIO
- Page 586: Horizontal vorticity budget associa
- Page 590: The distribution of convective syst
- Page 594: Relationship between CAPE and Boliv
- Page 598: Wind, Temperature and Moisture Vert
- Page 602: WET-AMC/LBA campaign sounding data
- Page 606: COMPARISON AMONG TWO SIMPLE MODELS
- Page 612: Statistical Evaluation of the Wet S
- Page 616: Atmospheric Responses to Land and W
- Page 620: Janaina Braga Carmo CENA/ESALQ Post
- Page 624: Co-limitation by nitrogen and phosp
- Page 628: Nutrient dynamics through litterfal
- Page 632: Effects of different pasture manage
- Page 636: Phosphorus fractions in earthworm c
- Page 642: Mechanisms of conservation and cycl
- Page 646: Can traditional agroforestry practi
- Page 650: Nitrogen cycling in termite mounds
- Page 654: ALTERATIONS TO NITRATE AND AMONIUM
R<strong>at</strong>ionalizing Burned Carbon <strong>with</strong> Carbon Monoxide Exported from South AmericaR. Ch<strong>at</strong>field 1 , S. R. Freitas 2 , M. A. Silva Dias 2, and P. L. Silva Dias 22NASA Ames Research Center, Bldg. 245-5, Moffett Field, CA, 94035, USA, E-mail: ch<strong>at</strong>field@clio.arc.nasa.gov,2Rua do M<strong>at</strong>ão, 1226, Departamento de Ciências Atmosféricas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, BrazilE-mail: sfreitas@model.iag.usp.br; mafdsdia@model.iag.usp.br; pldsdias@model.iag.usp.br;We present several estim<strong>at</strong>es cross-checking <strong>the</strong> fluxes of carbon to <strong>the</strong> <strong>at</strong>mosphere from burning,comparing models th<strong>at</strong> are based on simple land-surface parameteriz<strong>at</strong>ions and <strong>at</strong>mospheric transportdynamics. Both estim<strong>at</strong>es made by NASA Ames and USP modeling techniques are quite highcompared to some detailed s<strong>at</strong>ellite/land-use studies of emissions. The flux of carbon liber<strong>at</strong>ed to <strong>the</strong><strong>at</strong>mosphere via biomass burning is important for several reasons. This flux is a fundemental st<strong>at</strong>isticfor <strong>the</strong> parameteriz<strong>at</strong>ion of <strong>the</strong> large-scale flux of gases controlling <strong>the</strong> reactive greenhouse gasesmethane and ozone. Similarly, it is central to <strong>the</strong> estim<strong>at</strong>ion of <strong>the</strong> transloc<strong>at</strong>ion of nitrogen andpyrodenitrific<strong>at</strong>ion in <strong>the</strong> tropics. Thirdly, CO 2 emitted from rainforest clearing contributes directly tocarbon lost from <strong>the</strong> rainforest system as it contributes to greenhouse gas forcing. While CO 2 frompasturage, agriculture, etc, is considered to be reabsorbed seasonally, and so “off budget” for <strong>the</strong>carbon cycle, it must also be accounted. CO 2 anomalies rel<strong>at</strong>ed to daily we<strong>at</strong>her and interannualclim<strong>at</strong>ic vari<strong>at</strong>ion are strong enough to perturb our scientific perception of long-term carbon storagetrends. We compare fluxes deduced from land-use st<strong>at</strong>istics (originally, W.M. Hao) and from s<strong>at</strong>ellitehot pixels (A. Setzer) <strong>with</strong> <strong>at</strong>mospheric fluxes determined by <strong>the</strong> mescoscale/continental scale modelsRAMS and MM5, and point to some new work <strong>with</strong> highly resolved global models (<strong>the</strong> NASA D<strong>at</strong>aAssimil<strong>at</strong>ion Office’s GEOS4). Our simul<strong>at</strong>ions are tied to events, so th<strong>at</strong> measured tracers like COtie <strong>the</strong> models directly to <strong>the</strong> burning and meteorology of a specific period. We point out a particularsensitivity in estim<strong>at</strong>es based on CO, and indic<strong>at</strong>e how analysis of CO 2 along <strong>with</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r biomassburningtracers may lead to an improved multi-species estim<strong>at</strong>or of carbon burned.